No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Monica Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare

2509 South Fourth Street, Philadelphia, PA 19148 · For profit - Individual · 180 certified beds · (215) 271-1080 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 271-1080 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Dec 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2314 S 3rd St · (215) 467-2205 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2501 S 7th St · (215) 465-3081 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
153 W Porter St · (215) 465-6650 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6 W Ritner St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.5%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.0%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.5%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.3%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.4%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine57.9%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.5%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.571.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.101.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 255 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 43.4–56.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 7.6–12.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 6.5–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
44.6%
Total nursing turnover
32.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 175.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of facility policy, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), oxygen use and Anxiety/ Dementia Care for three of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R22, Resident R143 and Resident 163). Findings Include: Review of facility policy on Interdisciplinary Care Planning Protocol revealed section All Admissions - Day of admission #2. Nursing Initiates Interim Care Plan – the interim care plan must address all immediate care needs. Under section Skilled Subacute Care Admissions #2. Interim care plan initiated on the day of admission must be reviewed by the IDCP team and modified by 8th day of admission. Under section Long Term Care Admissions -Within Fourteen Days #3. CAA Summary Sheet – CAA assessment is to be completed and documented in Section V and also in a CAA assessment note - triggered areas will be discussed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include: A tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on July 21, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. January 28, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. with Employee E7, Food Service Director (FSD), revealed the following concerns:Observation in the dry storage area revealed no designated area for dented cans.Observation in the walk-in freezer revealed an open box of chocolate chip cookie dough with the inner plastic bag open, and a box of pizza shells with the inner plastic bag open and a box of bacon with the inner plastic bag open to the circulating air.Interview with the FSD on July 21, 2025, at 9:40 a.m. confirmed the above findings and that he had slipped and fallen in the dish room getting bleach on his clothing.Observation during a follow up visit to the kitchen on July 23, 2025, at 9:40 a.m. revealed that when the dish machine drained between the wash and rinse cycle the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to enhance residents' dignity related to serving meals on disposable paperware and plasticware for one of three units (3rd Floor) and for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R8) Findings include: A review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Resident Rights, revised March 2025, states that it is the facility's policy that employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Observations during a follow up visit to the kitchen on July 23, 2025, at 12:05 p.m. revealed that on the tray line all the desserts consisting of mixed tropical fruit and vanilla pudding were prepared in a 4-ounce portion control disposable plastic cup with a plastic lid were being placed on all the trays going to all resident floors. Observations in the third-floor dining room on July 23, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that all residents' trays had the disposable plastic cups of fruit and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly assessed for the self-administration of a medication that was located in the resident's room for 1 out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R160) Findings include:Review of the July 2025 physician orders for Resident R160 included the diagnoses of transient ischemic attack (TIA- a mini stroke); seizures (a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings and levels of consciousness); kidney failure (a condition in which one or both of your kidneys no longer work on their own); diabetes (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar glucose), and xerosis cutis(excessive dry skin)Review of the July 2025 physician orders included an order dated February 13, 2025 and monthly thereafter, for the resident to have a medicated lotion Ammonium Lactate External Lotion 12% applied to her legs in the evening: Apply B/L LE (bilaterally legs) topically in the evenings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one out of 35 residents sampled (Residents R60).Findings include:A review of Resident R60's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (is the final stage of chronic kidney disease, where the kidneys can no longer function adequately, requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant for survival) and dependance on dialysis. Review of July 2025 physician order revealed that Resident R60 was receiving dialysis on Tue, Thu, Sat at 10:30 a.m. at a local dialysis center.Review of Resident R60's admission Minimum Data Set did not identified the resident has receiving dialysis services.Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on July 23, 2025, at 1:45 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that that the facility failed to ensure that a physician was notified of a rapid and significant weight gain, and failed to clarify a physician's order for 1 out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R160) Findings include:Review of the facility policy Weight Assessment, Management and Intervention Procedure, with a date of 3/25, indicated that nursing staff will measure resident weight on admission and monthly or as ordered by physician and that any weight change of 5% or more since the last monthly weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation, and if the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian. The policy also indicated that the Dietitian will respond within 24-72 hours of receipt of notification.Continued review of the policy indicated that resident assessment information shall be analyzed by the interdisciplinary team and conclusions shall be made regarding: Resident's target weight range (including rationale if different from ideal/usual body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement interventions such as turning and repositioning or offloading of heels for resident with total dependence to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R17).Review of Resident R17's clinical record revealed Resident R17 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, Dementia (progressive degenerative disease of the brain) and Chronic Kidney Disease.Review of Resident R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated June 13, 2025, revealed Resident R17 required extensive assistance and 2- person physical assist for bed mobility (how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture).Review of Resident R17'S care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident significant weight gain was assessed in a timely manner for one resident (Resident R160), and failed to ensure that the nutrition and hydration status were properly assessed related to the use of a PEG tube (feeding tube inserted into stomach) for another resident (Resident R10) for 2 out of 35 residents reviewed.Review of the facility policy Weight Assessment, Management and Intervention Procedure, with a date of 3/25, indicated that nursing staff will measure resident weight on admission and monthly or as ordered by physician and that any weight change of 5% or more since the last monthly weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation, and if the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian. The policy also indicated that the Dietitian will respond within 24-72 hours of receipt of notification.Continued review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident was administered oxygen according to physician's order for one resident of one resident reviewed on oxygen therapy. (Resident R158) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Oxygen Therapy revealed that under section POLICY: Oxygen is administered appropriately to resident to improve oxygenation and provide comfort to residents experiencing respiratory difficulties. Oxygen is administered by licensed staff and with a physician's order. Under section PROCEDURE: #12. To use oxygen with a resident: a. Turn on the Oxygen. Start the flow of Oxygen s ordered by the physician. Review of Resident R158's clinical record revealed that Resident R158 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow and swell, and produce extra mucus, which makes it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled and dated for two of three units reviewed (Second floor unit, First floor St. [NAME] unit) and properly stored for one of one resident observed with medication in the room. (Resident R160) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Storage of Medication section Policy Statement revealed that The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation #4. The faciality shall not use discontinued, outdated or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.Observation of the Second-floor medication room conducted with licensed nurse Employee E14 and Unit Manager, Employee E13 conducted on July 21, 2025, at 11:46AM reveled that two opened vials of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative vials (PPD-a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of employee credentials, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services (Employees E7). Findings include: An interview on July 21, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. with Employee E7, Food Service Director (FSD), revealed that his responsibilities included oversight of ordering, receiving, storing, preparation and service of food. Further interview with the FSD confirmed that he was not currently a certified dietary manager (CDM); or a certified food manager (CFM); or had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body; and that he had not received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian. A review of Employee E3's credentials revealed that Employee E7 did not meet the statutory qualifications of a director of food and nutrition services. During an interview on July 24, 2025, at 11:15 a.m. with Employee E1, Administrator, the FSD's personnel file and his qualifications were discussed which revealed he had been working at the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R18, R22, R60, R104, and R187). Findings include: A review of the undated Room Test Tray Evaluation form from Nutrition Services, Inc., revealed that the Standard for cold food is 40-55 degrees and for hot food 135-160 degrees.Interview with Resident R60 on July 21, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that he did not like that the hot food was often cold and the milk could be colder.Interview with Resident R187 on July 21, 2025, at 10:35 a.m. revealed that he is at the end of the hallway and his food is always cold, and that the French fries the other day were not even cooked, and that the eggs are terrible when they are cold. Interviews were held on July 23, 2024 with 12 alert, and oriented residents during resident council. Residents had complaints about the food served at the facility. Resident R18 stated, the food is cold,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that terms of a binding arbitration agreement included required language to protect the rights of the resident or resident representative.Findings include: Review of Binding Arbitration Agreement, enclosed in the admission Agreement revealed that the agreement did not contain language that would allow the resident or anyone else (e.g., resident's representative) to communicate with federal, state, or local officials such as federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees and representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman.Interview on July 24, 2025, at 11:45 a.m. with Employee E1, Nursing Home Administrator and Employee E8, Regional Operations Director confirmed that the arbitration agreement did not contain the required language as state above.28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a)(b) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of hospice documentation and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a recommendation from the contracted hospice agency related to a resident's medication management was addressed and/or implemented for 1 out of 1 hospice record reviewed (Resident R90). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Hospice Program dated 3/25, indicated that when a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the facility, hospice agency and resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. The care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status.Review of Resident R90's July 2025 physician orders included the following diagnosis: multiple sclerosis (a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves and can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a term for lung and airway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly where food and laundry is received. Findings Include: On September 27, 2024, 11:27 a.m., reviewed the dumpster area in the presence of the Director of Environmental Services, Employee E16 (dumpster is a large trash receptacle designed to be hoisted and emptied into a truck). The dumpster was leaking and oozing creamy colored, foul odorous liquid, through the sides of the dumpster, over the floor, around the dumpster, where the floor was irregularly covered with dark greasy appeared substances. At the time of the finding, E16 confirmed the observation. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure two residents were free from significant medication errors for two of three residents reviewed. (Resident R24, and Resident R101) Findings include: Review of resident R 24's annual [NAME] Datra Set (MDS- a federal mandated process for clinical assessments for all residents) dated August 4, 2024, revealed that Resident R24 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of seizure disorder and dementia. Resident R 4 was assessed as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental States) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident R24's care plan revealed that Resident R 24 had seizure disorder with a plan to give medications as ordered, monitor and document for effectiveness and side effects. Review of Resident R24's physician orders revealed that Resident 24 had an order for Vimpat (Lacosamide, medication used to treat seizures) oral solution 10 milligram per mill give 15ML…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to address the potential for developing a pressure ulcer and develop/implement a plan of care to prevent pressure ulcers for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R145). Findings Include: Review of undated facility policy Care Planning Protocol revealed nursing provides an overview of medical and nurse care regimes. Nursing provides input especially related to activities of daily living, skin, weights, and safety needs. Care Are Assessment Summary triggers are reviewed by the team to decide whether to proceed with care planning for each triggered area. Review of Resident R145's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated January 25, 2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was cognitively intact, and had a diagnoses of muscle weakness and malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards relating to medication found at bedside for one of seven residents observed. (Resident R 153) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration Policy revealed licensed nursing professionals will administer medications according to time of administration determined by the facility. Medications administered outside the prescribed time frame requires physician notification and documentation in a medical record. Review of facility policy titled titled Self-Medication Administration Policy revealed that this policy applies to all residents who have been assessed and deemed capable of safely managing their own medications, in accordance with state regulations and nursing home protocols. Documentation of resident's eligibility, training, and ongoing monitoring will be maintained in the resident's medical records. Review of resident physician orders revealed no order or indication that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency supplies for one out of three sampled residents receiving hemodialysis (Resident 141). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Dependance on Renal Dialysis. Review of physician order for Resident R141, dated September 25, 2024, indicated a modification of the previous orders for Dialysis as follows: Resident receives dialysis on Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday, one time a day. (Dialysis is a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). Physician order dated September 19, 2024, for Resident R141, indicated to check Permacath at right chest wall, and to ensure caps are secure and that clamps are closed, Emergency Clamp at bedside. (A Permacath is a special catheter used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interview. it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications to meet resident needs for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R117). Findings Include: Review of Resident R117's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 22, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Review of Resident R117's comprehensive care plan dated October 5, 2022, revealed the resident used anti-anxiety medications related to anxiety disorder. Intervention dated December 8, 2020, included to give anti-anxiety medications as ordered. Review of Resident R117's physician order summary revealed a physician order dated June 17, 2024, to administer two milligrams (mg) of diazepam two times per day for anxiety. Review of Resident R117's medication administration record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the attending physician timely reviewed identified irregularities and failed to document the action taken to address the irregularities for two of five residents reviewed (Resident 117 and 144). Findings Include: Review of undated facility policy Consultant Pharmacist revealed the consultant pharmacist will establish a system whereby the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations regarding the resident's drug therapy are communicated to the appropriate designee to implement and/or respond to the recommendations in an appropriate and timely fashion. Further review of facility policy revealed the timing of these recommendations should enable a response prior to the next drug regimen review. Review of Resident R117's Consultant Pharmacist Review Physician Report dated February 9, 2024, by consultant pharmacist, Employee E10, revealed the resident's medication olanzapine with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) diagnosis will trigger for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure documentation for the need for a medication to treat a specific diagnosed condition with use of a psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R117). Findings Include: Review of Resident R117's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated January 4, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of anxiety and depression. During the monthly medication regimen review, the pharmacist evaluates resident-related information for dose, duration, continued need, and the emergence of adverse consequences for all medications. Review of Resident R117's monthly medication regimen review, dated February 9, 2024, revealed recommendations by the Consultant Pharmacist, Employee E10, that olanzapine (also known as Zyprexa - antipsychotic medication used to treat severe agitation associated with certain mental/mood conditions) with major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for two of six residents observed during medication administration (Resident R29, and R151). Findings include: On September 26, 2024, at 9:39 a.m., observed that Employee E13, a Licensed Nurse, administered to Resident R 29, Vitamin D3 10 MCG 400 IU tablet. Review of physician order for Resident R29, revealed an order to administer Vitamin D3 Tablet 25 MCG (1000 UT) (Cholecalciferol), one tablet by mouth in the morning. At the time of the observation, interview with Licensed Nurse, E13, confirmed the above findings. On September 26, 2024, at 9:54 a.m., observed that Employee E14, a Licensed Nurse, administered to Resident R151, the medicine, Metoprolol Succinate ER (Extended Release) Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG (Metoprolol Succinate), one tablet by mouth. Employee E14 was going to crush the Extended-Release Tablet, but was timely prevented from crushing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet resident needs for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R10). Findings Include: Review of Resident R10's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated April 2, 2024, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior). Review of Resident R10's comprehensive care plan dated July 18, 2024, revealed the resident had potential for episodes of anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease) related to disease process, schizophrenia. Intervention included psychological consultation and treatment as needed. Review of Resident R10's physician order history revealed an order dated April 2, 2024, for Divalproex (also known as Depakote - a medication that contains valproic acid, used to treat manic episodes associated with mood disorder) 500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records and interview with staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to provide dental services in a timely manner for one of eight residents reviewed.(resident R 97) Finding include: Review of facility policy titled Dental Services revealed that the facility will assist residents in obtaining routine care, 24-hour emergency dental care and denture replacement in the case of loss, damage, or ill-fitting dentures. This dental care may be provided in-facility or by scheduling and transporting to a dental provider. In case of an emergency the resident will be transported to a facility that provides emergency dental services. Further review of this policy indicates that any resident identified needing dental services will be referred to the dental provider within 3 days of the identification, and the resident care plan and [NAME] will be updated as needed. Interview with Resident R97's family member on September 24, 2024, at 12:20 p.m. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to hand hygiene, appropriate cleaning techniques for medical equipment, for four of the six residents observed during medication administration pass. (Resident 8, Resident 24, Resident 46 and Resident 155) Findings include: Review of Facility policy on Hand Hygiene, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), effective date April 1, 2024, indicated that the staff will follow established infection control procedures such as hand washing, antiseptic technique, gloves, and isolation precautions for administration of medications, as applicable. It also indicated that all reusable equipment will be decontaminated and/or sterilized between residents at the point-of-care. On September 25, 2024, 9:24 a.m., during medication administration, to Resident R 155, Employee E15, a Licensed Nurse, used the sphygmomanometer (an instrument for measuring blood pressure), and the pulse oximeter (an electronic device…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of one incident of resident injury sustained during a resident incontinence care for one of 34 residents reviewed . (Resident R67). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents/Patient Rights-Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Misappropriation of Resident/Patent's Property not dated reveals, procedure are in place to prevent any incidence of abuse; neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident/patient's property. Review of Resident R67's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction, occlusion, and stenosis of left middle cerebral artery hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, aphasia, heart failure. Review of the Resident R67's quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for three of 34 sampled residents. (Residents 107, R86, R121). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning Protocol undated revealed Nursing admission Assessment completed on day of admission but in no event later than 24 hours of admission. Nursing initiates interim Care Plan - the interim care plan must address all immediate care needs. Review of Resident R107's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic pulmonary edema, heart failure. Observation conducted on December 5, 2023, at 11:10 a.m. revealed resident having a oxygen concentrator near bedside and a portable oxygen tank behind his wheelchair. Oxygen was turned off during the interview. When questioned the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews of resident clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one resident (R46) out of eight residents' medication administration reviewed and failed to follow physician orders for one of 34 sampled residents reviewed (Resdient R85). Findings include: Review of the clinical records of Resident R46 revealed; the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (COPD refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and Hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles-lipids- in the blood). Review of physician order dated April 26, 2023, for Resident R46, revealed an order for Aspirin Oral Tablet Chewable 81 MG, give one tablet by mouth, one time a day, to prevent stroke. On December 5, 2023, at 9:37 a.m., it was observed that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for one resident needing continuous oxygen therapy for two of 34 resident records reviewed (Resident R2 and R107). Findings Include: Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, dependence on supplement oxygen. Review of Resident R2 physician orders dated July 3, 2023, revealed 4 liters of oxygen was to be continuously administered via nasal cannula. Review of Resident R2's care plan dated January 4, 2023, revealed give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. Observation conducted on December 5, 2023, at 12:07 p.m. revealed that the oxygen concentrator was set at 3 Liter. This observation was confirmed by the license nurse, unit manager, Employee E14. Observation conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and resident's goals and preferences for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R88) Findings include: Review of R88's clinical records revealed past medical history of presence of right artificial knee joint, fracture of surgical neck of left humerus, history of falls, depression, chronic pain, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies. During interview with Resident R88 on December 4, 2023 at 11:45am, resident complained of being roughly handled during morning hygiene care. R88 stated the aide came in room asked if I needed to be changed, I said yes and she said to turn over on your side - when she turned she pulled my right leg backwards causing excruciating pain. I initially told woman to be careful with left arm because it was painful and it's in process of healing and is sensitive but she grabbed my left shoulder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, interviews with staff and residents and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess each resident for the use of bed rails and obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails for one of three residents who had experienced falls. (Resident R86) Findings include: Observations of the bed used by Resident R86 at 10:30 a.m., on December 5, 2023 revealed that this resident had bed rails attached on either side near the head of the bed. Interview with the licensed nurse, Employee E9, at 9:30 a.m., on December 6, 2023 revealed that this nurse was familiar with the care of Resident R86. The nurse reported that there were no bedrail on the resident's bed at the time of the fall on September 8, 2023. The bed rails were added to Resident R86's bed post fall to assist with turning during incontinence care . Clinical record review for Resident R86 revealed a quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] indicating that this resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with residents, residents' family members and staff, as well as review of facility's documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs and individual needs as required by the resident's diagnoses, medical condition, and plan of care for three of 34 residents reviewed. (Residents R69, R56) Findings include: Review of 'St. [NAME] Facility Assessment Tool' revealed Individual staff assignments are reviewed and determined daily by the charge nurse(s) with input from the interdisciplinary team based upon resident needs. Staff assignments are modified, as applicable, regarding resident care needs in order to provide optimal care for each resident. Interview with licensed nurse, employee E18, on December 4, 2023, at 11:18 am, on St. [NAME] unit, revealed that she was assigned to 30 residents and last thing I heard there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address residents' dementia care needs for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R143). Findings Include: A review of the clinical record of Resident R143, revealed; admission to the facility on July 6, 2022, with diagnoses that included Dementia (Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), and Anxiety Disorder (Severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), which is a Resident Assessment and Care Screening Item Set, dated May 1, 2023, also indicated that, R143 had the diagnosis of Dementia. On December 4, 2023, at 12:31 p.m., review of R143's interdisciplinary plan of care revealed no care plan pertaining to dementia care. During an interview on December 4, 2023, at 12:35 p.m., the Unit Manager, a Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident council interview, staff interviews, review of facility policy and reviews of the established meal time schedule, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a nourishing snack was provided when 14 hours are between a substantial evening meal and breakfast in two of two nursing units. (3rd floor and 2nd floor unit). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Nutrition Services (between meal and bedtime), serving undated revealed Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. A review of the established meal schedule for the residents revealed that the supper meal was scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on St. [NAME] nursing unit. The breakfast meal the following morning was scheduled for 8:45 a.m., on the St. [NAME] nursing unit. The times indicated on the meal time schedule were over fourteen hours, until the breakfast meal the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the garbage and refuse area was maintained in a manner to prevent common household pests from entering the building. Findings include: Observations at 1:00 p.m., on December 4, 2023 revealed two sets of doors leading directly outside the building and into the driveway where garbage and refuse was being stored. The driveway contained an uncovered dumpster unit and a trash compactor, broken furniture, plastic crates and wooden pallets. This area was also used as a loading and receiving area for outside vendors to bring goods and services into the facility. The outdoor garbage and refuse holding area was located on the first floor of the facility. The St. [NAME], St. [NAME] and St. [NAME] nursing units were also located on the first floor of the facility. Further observations of the two sets of doors opening to the outside, revealed that the doors were not sealing securely. It was noted that the threshold of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents and resident clinical record and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R169). Findings include: Review of admission record indicated Resident R169 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis Post laminectomy syndrome (condition which patient continues to feel pain after undergoing a correctional laminectomy or another form of back surgery), muscle weakness, post cholecystectomy syndrome (the presence of abdominal symptoms after a cholecystectomy), post thrombotic syndrome (also called post phlebitis syndrome and venous stress disorder). Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary and home like environment for residents in two of two nursing units. (St. [NAME] 1st Floor unit and St. [NAME] 2nd floor,) Findings include: On December 4, 2023, at approximately 10:30 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident R138 who reported that housekeeping staff do not remove trash out of her room on daily bases. On December 4, 2023, at 1:34 p.m. Resident R107 observed wheeling out in his room [ROOM NUMBER] in the wheelchair with a large and full garbage bag and wanted to throw away his trash into the housekeeping large trash can which was standing in the hallway. During the interview it revealed that housekeeping staff do not daily empty the personal trash can and R107 will not let his trash overflow. R107 restroom also was observed dirty with brown substance on the floor, restroom trash had no trash bag and had brown substance in the trash, used and unsanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program related to flying insects on one of four nursing units reviewed (third floor) and in the main kitchen. Findings include: Observations on December 4, 2023, at 10:21 a.m., of St. [NAME], the third floor, revealed there were flying insects that resembled house flies in the room of Resident R117, room [ROOM NUMBER] B. Observations on December 6, 2023, at 12:09 p.m., of St. [NAME], the third floor, revealed there were flying insects that resembled house flies in the room of Resident R117, room [ROOM NUMBER] B. On December 5, 2023, at 1:11 p.m. observation were made in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A and flies were observed by Resident R23's bedside. On the top of Resident R23'sbedside dresser there was a white pest trap. When questioned why there was a pest trap on the top of the dresser, R23 stated pest control exterminator placed it there. Observation was confirmed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with showers for three of five residents reviewed (Residents R1, R4 and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Activites of Daily Living (ADLs) dated July, 1, 2021 stated based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident/patient (herein after patient) and consistent with the patient's needs and choices, the Center must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a patient's activities of daily living (ADL) activities are maintained or improved and do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that a change was unavoidable. During observation on October 5, 2023, at 10:48 a.m. Resident R1 stated that her shower days are Saturdays and Wednesdays. Yesterday October 4, 2023, was a Wednesday and she did not get a shower. No one offered her a shower and she prefer a shower. During a follow up interview at 11:18 a.m. on this same day Resident R1 reported the last time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with residents and staff, review of facility policy, and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that call bells were available and working for five of five units observed. (St. [NAME], St. [NAME], St. [NAME], St. [NAME] , and St. [NAME] De [NAME]). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Call Bell Policy and Procedure dated 2/20 stated Resident will have functioning call bells to alert staff of their needs. Interview with Resident R2 on September 11, 2023 at 10:15 a.m. revealed the resident's call bell has not been working. The resident stated that the call bell has not been working for a few days now. Resident R2 stated that a nurse came in and gave him a call bell this morning but that other people have had their bells for a few days now. The call bell was tested at 10:21 a.m. and the call bell did not light at the base of the wall in Resident R2's room. At 10:31 a.m. the light was checked outside of the resident's room and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BASCH, JOELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/28/2023
BASCH, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/28/2023
BASCH, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/28/2023
BASCH, YITZIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/28/2023
ROSENBERG, AVRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 11/28/2023
ROSENBERG, ESTHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF16%since 11/28/2023
ROSENBERG, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST27%since 11/28/2023
ROSENBERG, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 11/28/2023
2509 SOUTH FOURTH REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/28/2023
STERN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
COX, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
HONIG, PETERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/28/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 13%Other / private 15%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$323per resident / day
operating cost
$9,808per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395558. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next