No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC

27100 Cedar Rd, Beachwood, OH 44122 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 355 certified beds · (216) 831-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation$10,221 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,221 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
26900 Cedar Rd · (216) 839-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy0.5 mi
25105 Cedar Road
Grocery
25105 Cedar Road
Park
Cedar Rd · (216) 635-3200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
26300 Cedar Rd · (216) 704-2073

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.2%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.4%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.2%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.1%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%12.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.721.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 581 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
82.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 82.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.8%CMS range 56.8–65.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 9.4–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge82.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.3–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
1.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
63.5%
Total nursing turnover
45.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 355 beds and averages 265.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 90 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.30 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-22)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of a facility fall investigation, hospice staff interview, review of a hospice electronic mail (e-mail) correspondence, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered fall interventions were implemented and further failed to accurately report assessment findings and timely notify the attending physician and resident representative following a fall. Actual harm occurred on 09/15/24 at 11:00 P.M. when Resident #280, who was assessed to be at high risk for falls, sustained a fall from bed onto the floor without a physician ordered fall mat in place sustaining a fractured right clavicle (collarbone) and fracture at the sixth and seventh ribs. At the time of the fall, nursing staff assessed the resident and identified Resident #280 had limited range of motion (ROM) to her upper extremities and pain. The facility failed to accurately report Resident #280's injuries to the hospice provider, and did not immediately notify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe physical environment by using unapproved electric coiled space heaters for heating. This had the potential to affect an unidentified number of residents residing on eight resident units who utilized the exit corridors, dining areas and nurses' workstations. The facility census was 267.Findings include:Observation on 01/20/26 from 5:15 P.M. until 7:15 P.M. during a tour of the facility with Maintenance Director (MD) #501 and Nursing Supervisor (NS) #500 revealed a total of 18 unapproved coiled portable electric space heaters located within eight of the facility's resident units in the exit corridors, nurses' workstations and dining areas. Interview at the time of the observation with MD #501 and NS #500 verified the electric coiled space heaters were placed throughout the facility due to the building heating system not maintaining required temperatures of 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2725672 and Complaint Number 2721209.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, drug package insert review, prescribing information review and review of the facility policy, the facility did not ensure residents were administered medications free of medication error rate of five percent or less. This affected two (Residents #171 and #173) out of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 243.Findings include:Observation on 12/03/25 from 8:11 A.M. to 11:03 A.M. and 12/04/25 at 10:56 A.M. of medication administration completed by Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN)s #606, #611, #612, #614, and #615 revealed there were two medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in an eight percent medication error rate. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #173 revealed an admission date of 07/15/21 with diagnoses including dysphagia, hypokalemia (low potassium), dementia, and atherosclerotic heart disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #173 had cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-15 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run report, review of a facility incident report, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility to ensure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated immediately and performed appropriately following Resident #271, a resident with a Full code status (indication for healthcare providers to perform all possible life saving measures in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest) was found unresponsive. This affected one resident (#271) of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility identified 178 residents who had an advance directive of a full code. The facility census was 270.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #271 revealed an admission date of 09/25/25 and a date of death of [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified convulsion, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, end stage renal disease, dependence upon renal dialysis, adult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, test tray and interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a safe and palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the facility except for six residents (#1, #2, #101, #212, #240, and #261) identified by the facility as having orders for nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 259. Findings include:Interview on 09/08/25 at 11:17 A.M. Resident #58 stated there was no good help in the kitchen. The food in the kitchen is strictly kosher, and she is not getting enough food. She stated sometimes the food is cold because there were not enough staff. By the time she gets her food, it's cold. She also stated the food comes from the kitchen late and it's not good. Interview on 09/08/25 at 12:28 P.M. Resident #192 stated the food is bad, and she cannot eat it. Interview on 09/08/25 at 3:54 P.M. Resident #272 stated the food is gross, cold, and not cooked properly. Interview on 09/09/25 at 8:29 A.M. Resident #54 stated the food was okay, but not seasoned. Interview on 09/11/25 at 8:32 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #173. This affected one resident (#173) of 15 residents on the 200-hall of the Beachwood unit and had the potential to affect all 259 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #173 revealed an admission date of 12/11/24. Diagnoses included dementia, arthritis of the knee, depression, diabetes and high cholesterol. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #173 was severely cognitively impaired. She was independent with eating, required partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene, dressing, showering and personal hygiene and substantial to maximum assistance for toileting. Observation 09/09/25 at 7:45 A.M. revealed Resident #173 was lying in bed asleep. Her call light was hanging over the partition next to the bed, out of reach. Interview on 09/09/25 at 7:47…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #286 was free from physical abuse by Residents #259 and #201 and failed to ensure Resident #106 was free from physical abuse by Resident #275. This affected two (Residents #286 and #106) of eight residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 259. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 07/03/25. Diagnoses included encephalopathy (a disturbance in brain function that causes changes in mental state, behavior, and cognitive abilities), muscle weakness, kidney failure, communication deficit and dementia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 was severely cognitively impaired. He required partial to moderate assistance for eating, personal and oral hygiene and substantial to maximum assistance for toileting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident physical abuse were reported to the State Agency within two hours as required. This affected four (Residents #106, #259, #275 and #286) of eight reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 259. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 07/03/25. Diagnoses included encephalopathy (a disturbance in brain function that causes changes in mental state, behavior, and cognitive abilities), muscle weakness, kidney failure, communication deficit and dementia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 was severely cognitively impaired. He required partial to moderate assistance for eating, personal and oral hygiene and substantial to maximum assistance for toileting, showering and dressing. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure incidents of resident-to-resident incident physical abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected four (Residents #106, #259, #275 and #286) of eight residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 259. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 07/03/25. Diagnoses included encephalopathy (a disturbance in brain function that causes changes in mental state, behavior, and cognitive abilities), muscle weakness, kidney failure, communication deficit and dementia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 was severely cognitively impaired. He required partial to moderate assistance for eating, personal and oral hygiene and substantial to maximum assistance for toileting, showering and dressing. Review of the care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) received assistance for feeding and showers as ordered, recommended per therapy and/or per preference. This affected two residents (#8 and #195) out of four residents reviewed for resident's dependent on ADL care on the [NAME] unit. This had the potential to affect four residents (#91, #107, #185, and #195) that required feeding assistance, and all 31 residents (#8, #33, #45, #61, #89, #91, #93, #102, #104, #107, #143, #146, #155, #181, #185, #187, #192, #194, #195, #198, #199, #200, #203, #213, #229, #231, #233, #249, #252, #267, and #292) that the facility identified requiring assistance with showers on the [NAME] unit. The facility census was 259. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #195 revealed an admission date of 02/01/10 with diagnoses including hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, dysphagia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #201 was offered activities to meet her preferences. This affected one resident (#201) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 259. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #201 revealed an admission date of 07/19/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, congestive heart failure, glaucoma, kidney disease and anxiety. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #201 was severely cognitively impaired. She required setup help for eating, and supervision for oral hygiene, toileting dressing, showering and hygiene. It was very important to her to have books, newspapers and magazines to read, listen to music that she liked, be around animals, keep up with the news, do things with groups of people, get fresh air outside and participate in religious services or practices. Review of the care plan dated 07/25/25 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a change in condition was thoroughly addressed and vital signs were obtained as ordered. This affected two residents (#93 and #278) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 259. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #278 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and expired on [DATE] (. Diagnoses included malnutrition, diabetes, spinal stenosis, high cholesterol and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #278 was severely cognitively impaired. She required setup help for eating, substantial or maximum assistance for oral care and was dependent on staff for toileting, showering and personal hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for [DATE] revealed an order for a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Only Arrest (DNRCCA) (order that allows patients to receive all standard medical treatments, including resuscitation, until a cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place and falls were thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (Resident #259) of three reviewed for falls and orders. The facility census was 259. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #259 revealed an admission date of 09/27/24. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, artificial hip joints, dementia, depression and glaucoma. Review of the care plan initiated 10/09/24 revealed Resident #259 was at risk for falls. Interventions included anticipating the resident's needs, anticipating safety needs and potential hazards, assessing proper footwear and suggesting change if needed, ensuring the resident's call light is within reach and encouraging the resident to use it to call for assistance. A new intervention was added on 11/11/24 to lay the resident down after meals. Review of the care plan dated 10/16/24 revealed Resident #259 had an actual fall.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated when changed and proper signage on the entrance to a resident's rooms indicating oxygen was in use. This affected two residents (#45 and #93) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory needs. This had the potential to affect 16 additional residents (#2, #13, #27, #60, #79, #85, #101, #105, #122, #170, #177, #185, #193, #231, #242, and #272) identified by the facility as using oxygen. The facility census was 259. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 11/27/23 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen in body tissues), hypertension, and congestive heart failure (CHF). There was nothing in the medical record to indicate when Resident #93's oxygen tubing was changed. Review of the physician order dated 07/25/25 revealed Resident #93 had an order for oxygen at two liters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was provided with reliable transportation to and from dialysis. This affected one resident (#7) of two residents reviewed for transportation. The facility census was 295. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/27/24. Diagnoses included fracture of the left fibula, acute pain due to trauma, diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of physician order dated 12/28/24 revealed Resident #7 received dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. The resident must be in the lobby at 9:00 A.M. for pick-up. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #7 dated 01/08/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #7 used a walker and a wheelchair. Transfers were not attempted due to medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately provide trauma-informed care to Residents #8 and #74. This affected two residents (#8 and #74) out of two residents reviewed for trauma-informed care. This had the potential to affect four residents (#8, #74, #81, and #157) identified by the facility with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The facility census was 259. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 03/12/25 with diagnoses including PTSD (on admission), diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and major depression. Review of the Social Service Initial Evaluation dated 03/14/25 and completed Social Service Designee (SSD) #844 revealed on Resident #8's evaluation under trauma informed care, it asked if the resident reported or if the medical record reflected any history of trauma, and it stated it was unable to be determined.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and/or legible. This affected two residents (#8 and #91) out of 44 resident records reviewed for accuracy and/or identifiable information. The facility census was 259. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #91 revealed an admission date of 05/15/25 with diagnoses including dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #91 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for eating. She held food in her mouth and cheeks and received nutrition through parenteral feedings (a medical treatment that provides essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream through an intravenous (IV) line). Review of the After Visit Summary revealed Resident #91 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 09/02/25 as she was admitted to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #284 was permitted to return to the facility after being transferred to the emergency room due to an acute change in condition. This affected one resident (#284) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 283. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #284 revealed an admission date of 02/03/22 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease, amputation, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #284 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #284 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 02/04/22 revealed Resident #284 was expected to remain in the facility for long-term care placement. Review of the physician's orders dated November 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the label directions on the cleaning wipes and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of a blood glucose meter while checking resident blood sugar levels. This affected two residents (Resident #127 and #271) and had the potential to affect an additional 28 residents (Resident #5, #31, #36, #46, #49, #51, #58, #61, #81, #85, #92, #116, #124, #145, #148, #152, #163, #186, #195, #230, #242, #245, #254, #261, #272, #273, #275, and #276) who received blood glucose level checks via a glucometer. The facility census was 277. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #127 revealed an admission date of 11/13/24. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician orders for Resident #127 revealed an order dated 11/15/24 for Humalog solution 100 units/milliliter (ml) (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale before meals for diabetes. Observation on 01/14/25 at 8:44 A.M. of a blood sugar assessment via glucometer revealed Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #138's physician and responsible party was notified of a change in condition. This affected one resident (Resident #138) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 277. Findings include: Record review for Resident #138 revealed an admission date of 12/02/21. Diagnosis included need for assistants with personal care, stress incontinence, and morbid severe obesity. Observation on 01/13/25 at 11:26 A.M. of incontinent care for Resident #138 provided by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #748 revealed Resident #138 had an open area to the right anterior/medial thigh. The open area was actively bleeding a small amount serosanguinous drainage. No treatment was observed to the area. CNA #748 revealed she worked on Saturday, 01/11/25, and the same open area was there then. CNA #748 wiped off the wound during incontinent care while Resident #138 revealed the area was painful. Observation on 01/13/25 between 11:48 A.M. and 12:29 P.M. of the wound on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess and provide wound care for Resident #138. This affected one resident (Resident #138) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 277. Findings include: Record review for Resident #138 revealed an admission date of 12/02/21. Diagnosis included need for assistants with personal care, stress incontinence, and morbid severe obesity. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #138 was cognitively intact. Resident #138 used a wheelchair for mobility, required partial/moderate assistants for toileting hygiene, and dependent for personal hygiene. Resident #138 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #138 was at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. Record review of the care plan dated 06/10/24 revealed Resident #138 had potential for impaired skin integrity. Interventions included to provide skin care per facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, review of a video recording, review of the facility investigation report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer Resident #85 and Resident #155's medications per physician orders. This affected two residents (Resident #155 and #85) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility census was 277. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #155 revealed an admission of 02/03/22. Diagnosis included unspecified convulsions, atherosclerotic heart disease, and constipation. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #155 was cognitively intact. Resident #155 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Review of the physician orders for Resident #155 revealed orders for Atorvastatin calcium tablet 40 milligrams (mg) give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening related to atherosclerotic heart disease ordered 11/26/23; scheduled to be given from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M., Polyethylene Glycol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed physician orders were followed and the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had four medication errors of 30 opportunities for an error rate of 13.33%. This affected three residents (Resident #8, Resident #127, and Resident #271) of nine residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 277 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/08/25. Diagnosis included Parkinson's, cerebral infarction, and muscle weakness. Review of the Clinical admission assessment completed 01/08/25 revealed Resident #8 was verbal, oriented to person, place, and required cues. Review of the physician orders for Resident #8 revealed Resident #8 had an order dated 01/10/25 for Aspirin 81 milligram (mg) oral tablet give one tablet by mouth in the morning for Parkinson's; scheduled to be given between 8:00 A.M. and 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable. This had the potential to affect 261 of 261 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen with the exception of three residents (#99, #182, #204) who the facility identified as receiving no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 264. Findings include: Interview on 10/16/24 at 10:15 A.M. with Resident #7 revealed the resident had concerns the food was not good and was not hot when served. Interview on 10/17/24 at 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Director (DD) #858 during tour of the kitchen and kitchenettes revealed the dishwasher was currently not being utilized for the cleaning and sanitizing of dishware for residents. DD #858 revealed all residents were served on disposable dishware and plastic silverware. DD #858 stated the facility was currently waiting for additional parts (timeframe for parts to arrive was not provided) to fix the dishwasher after it had not reached the required temperatures of at least 180 degrees Fahrenheit. DD #858 revealed the dishwasher was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the job descriptions, review of the employee handbook, and interviews, the facility failed to have systems in place to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Administrative staff failed to ensure staff did not sleep while on duty, failed to ensure staff did not have and/or utilize phones for personal use in resident care areas of the facility and failed to ensure the kitchen dishwasher was utilized timely after repairs to ensure meals were not served on disposable plates resulting in food being served from the kitchen that was not palatable. This affected 15 residents (#95, #7, #87, #36, #103, #199, #205, #126, #54, #243, #118, #89, #226, #190 and #188) and had the potential to affect all 264 facility residents residing in the facility which included 35 residents who resided on the Beachwood Pavilion unit and 55 residents who resided on the Euclid Pavilion unit. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the employee handbook, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from potential neglect when staff were sleeping while on duty. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents (#17, #27, #35, #47, #56, #62, #70, #76, #83, #92, #98, #102, #109, #120, #129, #131, #142, #143, #147, #150, #151, #161, #163, #165, #198, #213, #219, #221, #229, #231, #232, #233, #236, #246, #250) residing on the Beachwood Pavilion unit and the potential to affect all 55 residents (#3, #4, #11, #13, #18, #19, #20, #34, #36, #37, #42, #46, #54 #63, #66, #84, #86, #91, #94, #95, #99, #101, #103, #110, #113, #119, #123, #124, #126, #128, #133, #154, #156, #158, #160, #166, #168, #169, #172, #179, #181, #185, #187, #194, #199, #201, #202, #205, #210, #218, #227, #234, #238, #252, #262) residing on the Euclid Pavilion Unit. The facility census was 264. Findings include: Observation on 10/20/24 at 6:21 A.M. of the Beachwood Pavilion unit nursing station revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1001 was seated at the nursing station desk. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of the facility policy, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) directive related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective infection control program to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained while wound care was performed for Resident #67. This affected one resident (#67) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 264. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 06/21/24. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, cognitive communication deficit, Crohn's disease, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 10/01/24 revealed Resident #67 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Resident #67 had an indwelling urinary catheter, and two unhealed Stage II pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the nursing unit kitchenettes were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except two (#105 and #193) who received nothing by mouth and 34 residents (#2, #8, #24, #30, #40, #46, #54, #64, #76, #78, #111, #116, #131, #132, #136, #138, #140, #150, #154, #155, #159, #177, #185, #195, #216, #221, #222, #225, #226, #232, #249, #255, #265 and #269) who resided on the [NAME] nursing unit. The facility census was 276. Findings include: Observations on 09/24/25 from 10:49 A.M. to 11:36 P.M. of the nursing unit kitchenettes with Dietary Manager (DM) #597 revealed the following: • Euclid pavilion 1 nursing unit kitchenette had food spillage on the bottom shelf of the refrigerator. The meat and dairy microwaves were dirty with various dried food splatter inside. Further observation revealed food crumbs on the counters and on the two toasters. • Euclid pavilion 2 nursing unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the dishwasher temperature log, service manager interview, and review of the manufacturer's brochure for the facility's dishwasher, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher reached the minimum required temperature for proper dish sanitization. This had the potential to affect all but three residents (Residents #113, #203, and #293) who received meals prepared and served by the facility. The facility census was 288. Findings include: Observation on 09/11/24 from 2:04 P.M. to 2:15 P.M. of kitchen staff washing dishes using the M-iQ Flight-type Conveyor Warewasher revealed the dishwasher exhibited two error codes throughout the observation: 1) Rinse 1 Warning 701, low temperature, and 2) Warning 710, air gap tank under-run minimum. Further random observations revealed the final rinse temperature reading did not rise above 150 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F), averaging 144 °F. At 2:15 P.M., Director of Dietary Services #500 removed the facility's thermometer from the dish conveyor belt, which displayed a temperature reading of 157.7 °F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the employee handbook, the facility failed to ensure staff did have personal conversations, which included yelling into their phones, in resident rooms. not talk on their phone in resident care areas of the facility. This affected one (#294) out of four residents observed for staff -to-resident interactions. The facility census was 288. Findings include: An observation on 09/09/24 at 3:50 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 entered Resident #294's room to check on him and provide care as needed. LPN #301 was standing next to Resident #294's bed yelling in a very loud voice while talking on her personal cellular phone. After a few minutes LPN #301 exited Resident #294's room without speaking to Resident #294. LPN #301 continued to talk/yell loudly on her phone directly outside of Resident #294's room for a few more minutes. An interview with Resident #294 on 09/09/24 at 4:05 P.M. revealed he was startled by the way LPN #301 was yelling on the phone and wasn't sure why she was upset. Resident #294…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain wheelchairs and durable medical equipment in a clean and sanitary manner one (#120) out of three residents who used a wheelchair for mobility. The facility census was 288. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #120 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, cerebral infarction (stroke) with right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit with dementia, brain cancer, hydrocephalus with cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, seizures, congestive heart failure, depression, hypothyroidism, and pulmonary eosinophilia. An observation on 09/12/24 at 7:45 A.M. revealed Resident #120 was assisted up to his wheelchair by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #303. Resident #120's wheelchair had dried liquid substances and dried food/debris coating both the lower foot rest and leg rests of the wheelchair. STNA #120 applied both of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were provided as ordered for one (#105) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 288. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #105 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic osteomyelitis with draining sinus of the left femur, pain, depression, vitamin deficiency, chronic kidney disease, prostate cancer, anorexia, and monoclonal gammopathy. A review of Resident #105's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had intact cognition and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #105's wound assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed a left heel stage III pressure ulcer currently measuring 0.3 centimeters (cm) long by 0.3 cm wide by 0.2 cm. deep. Resident #105's physician order dated 08/27/24 revealed to clean the left heel ulcer with normal saline, pat dry, pack the wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff treated Residents #68 and #126 with respect and dignity. This affected two residents (#68 and #24) of ten residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 276. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, suprapubic cystostomy, a surgical connection between the bladder and abdomen to drain urine, Crohn's disease, malnutrition, Parkinson Disease, fracture of the right patella, (the knee bone) and tibia (shin bone), and neuromuscular bladder, disfunction of the bladder due to nerve injury. Review of Resident #68's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for eating, toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #68's care plan dated 07/02/24 revealed the resident had impaired functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify Resident #281 or the resident's representative before a transfer to another room. This affected one resident (#281) of three residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 276. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #281 revealed an admission date of 05/07/25. Diagnoses included multiple fractures of the pelvis, difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, diabetes, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident was discharged to an assisted living facility on 05/28/24. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #281 had impaired cognition. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #281 was transferred from Heights Pavilion Second Floor H133 to Heights Pavilion Second Floor H230 as of 05/15/24. (The resident's room was changed after dinner on 05/14/24). Review of the communication with family/power of attorney (POA) note on 05/15/24 at 9:21 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to provide wound care according to physician's orders for Resident #68. This affected one resident (#68) of three residents reviewed for wound management. The facility census was 276. Finding include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, suprapubic cystostomy, a surgical connection between the bladder and abdomen to drain urine, Crohn's disease, malnutrition, Parkinson disease, fracture of the right patella (the knee bone) and tibia (shin bone), and neuromuscular bladder, disfunction of the bladder due to nerve injury. Review of Resident #68's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact and had two stage IV pressure ulcers. (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often include undermining and tunneling). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide routine indwelling urinary catheter care and failed to have indwelling urinary catheter care orders in place for Resident #68. This affected one resident (#68) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 276. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, suprapubic cystostomy, a surgical connection between the bladder and abdomen to drain urine, Crohn's disease, malnutrition, Parkinson's disease, fracture of the right patella (the knee bone) and tibia (shin bone), and neuromuscular bladder, and dysfunction of the bladder due to nerve injury. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 06/21/24 to record output from the suprapubic catheter every shift. This order was discontinued on 07/30/24. An order dated 06/22/24 stated to change and date the indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed prevent a significant medication error when Resident #38, who was being treated for chronic pain, did not receive pain medication as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#38) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 276. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/22/23 with diagnoses including multiple myeloma, anxiety, dementia, type II diabetes, and depression. The record revealed the resident was receiving hospice services. Review of the facility's pain documentation tab revealed the following: • On 06/01/24, Resident #38 had a pain score of zero, on a scale of zero to ten, indicating no pain. • On 06/20/24, Resident #38 had a pain score of one, indicating mild pain. • On 07/01/24, Resident #38 had a pain score of zero, indicating no pain. • There was no documented evidence of pain monitoring for Resident #38 from 07/01/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were always secure form unauthorized access. This affected one resident (#162) of 29 residents identified to receive medications on the involved nurse's assignment. The facility census was 276. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #162 revealed an admission date of 06/26/22 with diagnoses including hypertension, heart failure, vertigo, anxiety, syncope, seizures, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #162 had intact cognition and received and antibiotics and an opioid. Review of the physicians' orders for August 2024 revealed afternoon medication orders for Depakote 250 milligrams (mg) (anti-seizure medication) for seizures, Tramadol 50 mg (opioid pain medication), Tylenol 1000 mg (analgesic), gabapentin 10 mg (anticonvulsant and nerve pain medication), and a probiotic capsule (supplement). Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received clean silverware with meals. This affected five (Residents #42, #183, #215, #261, and #261) of five residents observed for meal service. The facility census was 266 residents. Findings include: Observation on 07/15/24 at 8:25 A.M. of the dietary cart on the [NAME] unit revealed it contained breakfast trays which had not yet been served to residents. The trays for Residents #42, #183, #215, #261, and #261 revealed the silverware on each of the trays had a translucent yellowish color with occasional small bumps solidified onto the surface. Interview on 07/15/24 at 8:33 A.M with Dietary Manager (DM) #401 confirmed the silverware on the breakfast trays for Residents #42, #183, #215, #261, and #261 was dirty. DM #410 confirmed the dietary staff had been handwashing some dishes due to problems with their dishwasher. Interviews on 07/15/24 at 11:22 A.M. with Resident #75 and at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner and failed to ensure staff was not taking personal phone calls while a resident was waiting for assistance. This affected three residents (#285, #116, and #139) out of five residents reviewed for call light response and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 285. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #285 revealed an admission date of 03/18/14 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, diabetes, morbid obesity, urinary incontinence, and heart failure. Review of the care plan dated 06/19/19 revealed Resident #285 was at risk for falls due to anxiety disorder, depression, and decline in functional status. Interventions included be sure the call light was within reach, encourage resident to use it, and promptly respond to all requests for assistance. Review of the care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure to obtain Pedialyte (oral electrolytes) ordered by the physician for Resident #226's resulting in nursing staff having to pay for the product with their own money. In addition, the facility failed to notify the physician when Pedialyte was unavailable, and staff were substituting it with Powerade. This affected one resident (#226) of five residents reviewed for dietary services. The facility census was 285. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #226 revealed an admission date of 06/13/22. Diagnoses included non-infective gastroenteritis and colitis, malignant lung cancer, and autistic disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #226 had intact cognition, no behaviors, and required set-up/clean up help with eating. The assessment also indicated the resident weighed 174 pounds, had no significant weight changes, and did not receive a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review, review of manufacture guidelines, facility policy review, and review of the facility Caregiver Safety Tips for use of a mechanical lift (device used to move a resident from one place to another)/ sling revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #280's mechanical lift sling was properly examined prior to transferring resulting in the sling strap breaking and Resident #280 falling to the floor. The facility also failed to complete a thorough nursing assessment prior to Resident #280 being transferred back to bed, the mechanical lift slings were properly laundered, and a thorough investigation was completed of the incident. This affected one resident (#280) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 285. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #280 revealed an admission date of 06/28/23 with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, and hemiplegia affecting her right dominate side. Review of the care plan dated 08/23/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #285's incontinence care was completed in a timely manner, did not place soiled linen and incontinence briefs (a product that holds urine or bowel movement) on the floor and that Resident #285 did not have two incontinence briefs applied at once. This affected one resident (#285) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. This had the potential to affect 50 residents (#20, #23, #26, #37, #38, #47, #48, #57, #60, #67, #72, #89, #91, #95, #119, #133, #135, #136 #138, #143, #150, #151, #155, #160, #169, #171, #189, #193, #195, #210, #213, #216, #217, #219, #221, #222, #233, #238, #246, #247, #248, #254, #257, #264, #274, #275, #278, #280, #282, and #285) on the Fairmount Unit that were identified as incontinent. The facility census was 285. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #285 revealed an admission date of 03/18/14 with and her diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure oxygen cylinders was secured safely and failed to ensure residents had oxygen signs indicating oxygen was in use upon entrance to their rooms. This affected three residents (#51, #193, and #262) out of four residents reviewed for oxygen use. This had the potential to affect 38 residents (#1, #6, #10, #17, #19, #25, #35, #38, #44, #71, #83, #99, #105, #115, #117, #130, #140, #148, #150, #155, #193, #194, #195, #199, #200, #205, #210, #211, #213, #219, #225, #241, #242, #243, #258, #261, #262, and #283) with orders for oxygen. The facility census was 285. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/19/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the care plan dated 04/02/24 revealed Resident #51 was on a respiratory program including cough and deep breathing per protocol. Interventions included assess respiratory status, cough and deep breathing exercises, and medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy and clinical pharmacology guidelines and manufacture insulin pen guidelines, the facility failed to ensure Resident #264's insulin by route of insulin pen (an injection device that can use to deliver a preloaded insulin subcutaneously (under the skin)) was administered in a safe manner according to the guidelines. This affected one resident (#264) out of three residents observed for insulin administration. This had the potential to affect 47 Residents (#4, #5, #14, #17, #34, #55, #57, #65, #66, #68, #75, #87, #89, #91, #93, #101, #102, #107, #117, #122, #123, #128, #136, #138, #144, #147, #156, #160, #177, #183, #187, #188, #189, #203, #206, #212, #224, #228, #234, #253, #255, #264, #274, #277, #279, #284, and #285) that had physician orders for insulin. The facility census was 285. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #264 revealed an admission date of 11/14/22 with diagnoses including hypertension, seizures,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed. This affected four (Residents #77, #110, #217 and #281) of 42 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The facility census was 318. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 04/07/22 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had clear speech, understood staff and was able to be understood by staff. Review of section C (assessment for cognition) under sections C0100, C0200, C0300, and C0400 revealed the questions were answered as not assessed which resulted in a dash for the cognitive score for Resident #77. The staff interview section for Resident #77 for cognition was also not assessed. Review of section D (assessment for mood) revealed interview with the resident was not performed and the questions were answered not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This affected four residents (#28, #43, #179 and #317) of 42 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 318. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 04/30/24. Medical diagnoses for Resident #28 included unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, essential primary hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage four, anemia in chronic kidney disease and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively impaired. Resident #28 was dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, upper body and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #28 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 07/29/22 revealed Resident #28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #764's call light was within reach and Resident #666's bed was of a comfortable length. This affected two of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, Residents #764 and #666. The facility census was 318. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #764 revealed an admission date of 02/06/24 with diagnoses including difficulty walking, muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus. Resident #764 was discharged from the facility on 05/03/24. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #764 had intact cognition, was dependent on staff for chair to bed transfer, and ambulation was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns during the assessment period. Observation and interview on 05/01/24 at 11:36 A.M. of Resident #764 revealed her call light was attached the handrail of her bed and the cord was wrapped around the handrail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the state survey agency in a timely manner. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of three residents investigated for concerns related to abuse (Resident #21, Resident #110 and Resident #217) The facility census was 318. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and major depressive disorder. During interview on 04/30/24, Resident #21 revealed that both she and her niece had discovered unauthorized charges on her bank credit card. Resident #21 indicated she had not initiated the charges. Resident #21 confirmed that her niece had reported the suspicious charges to Unit Manager (UM) #1339. Resident #21 was alert, oriented and able to respond to interview questions appropriately. During interview on 05/07/24 at 2:30 P.M., UM #1339 verified that Resident #21's niece…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of three residents investigated for concerns related to abuse (Resident #21, Resident #110 and Resident #217) The facility census was 318. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and major depressive disorder. During interview on 04/30/24, Resident #21 revealed that both she and her niece had discovered unauthorized charges on Resident #21's bank credit card. Resident #21 indicated she had not initiated the charges. Resident #21 confirmed that her niece reported the suspicious charges to the Unit Manager (UM) #1339. Resident #21 was alert, oriented and able to respond to interview questions appropriately. During interview on 05/07/24 at 2:30 P.M., UM #1339 verified that Resident #21's niece had reported an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were maintained throughout a wound care dressing change to promote healing of the wound. This affected one resident (Resident #296) out of eight residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 306. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #296 revealed an admission date of 03/21/24 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, acute kidney failure, prostate cancer, and pneumonia. Review of Resident #296's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required substantial assistance by two staff members for bed mobility toileting, and transfers. Review of Resident #296's physician's orders dated for March 2024 revealed orders to cleanse abrasion to right buttock with normal saline, pat dry and cover with foam dressing daily and as needed. Review of Resident #296's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents performed hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination of germs during Resident #16's and Resident #17's medication administration, Resident #23's perineal care and Resident #31's mechanical lift transfer. This affected two residents (Resident #16 and #17) out of six residents observed for medication administration, one resident (Resident #23) out of two residents observed for perineal care and one resident (Resident #31) out of one resident observed for mechanical lift transfer. The facility census was 317. Findings include: 1a. Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, dementia with cognitive communication deficit, heart block and arrhythmia, osteoarthritis, fractured radius, humerus and femur, iron deficiency anemia, mood disorder, anxiety, psychosis, hypothyroidism, and high blood pressure. Resident #16's physician order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's skin treatment was applied to prevent development of skin breakdown. This affected one resident (Resident #34) out of two residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 317. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection/inflammation of cardiac implant device, aortic aneurysm, leakage of aortic graft replacement, dementia, hypokalemia, defibrination syndrome (coagulation disorder), major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, adult failure to thrive, heart failure, acute kidney failure, diabetes mellitus, stage 2 sacral region pressure ulcer, and hyperosmolality. A review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for determining risk of skin breakdown revealed she had a risk of developing skin breakdown. Resident #34's physician order dated 12/08/23 to apply Chamosyn ointment 0.45-20 percent (menthol-zinc oxide) topically every shift for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff secured Resident #24's, Resident #29's, and Resident #33's medications. This affected three residents (Resident #24, Resident #29, Resident #33) out of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage with right sided paralysis, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and chronic gastritis. Resident #29's physician order dated 01/11/22 indicated to administer Omeprazole 20 milligram (mg) tablet orally once a day for gastritis and on 01/22/24 indicated to administer 10 milliliters (ml) of cough/chest congestion Dextromethorphan oral syrup 10/100 mg in 5 ml (dextromethorphan-guaifenesin) every 6 hours as needed for cough. An observation on 01/31/24 at 7:00 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was in the process of administering medications to Resident #29. The medication cart LPN #400 was using was located at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary, food items were dated when opened, there were internal thermometers for reach in freezers and refrigerators, microwaves in the kitchenettes were clean, and cross contamination did not occur when taking the temperatures of food items or when placing lids over the plates of food. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. The facility identified five residents (#111, #142, #209, #657, and #663) that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 309. Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 04/10/23 between 8:45 A.M. and 9:21 A.M. with Assistant Dietary Manager #1408 revealed the following concerns: In the kitchen area the following was observed: • An accumulation of black dust observed blowing from the metal cage of the fan on the wall next to the dairy warmer. • The six ANSUL nozzles above the soup kettle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This affected one resident (#33) of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 309. Findings include: Record review for Resident #33 revealed and admission date of 04/13/18. Diagnoses included heart failure, stage IV pressure ulcer of sacral region (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often include undermining and tunneling.), acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, diverticulosis, history of blood clots, breast cancer, and osteoarthritis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition. She required two-person extensive physical assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure fluid restrictions were being monitored for four residents (#98, #232, #233, and #270) out of four residents reviewed for fluid restriction. The facility identified eleven residents (#98, #161, #232, #233, #256, #259, #266, #270, #307, #631, and #651) on a fluid restriction. The facility census was 309. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #270 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #270 was cognitively intact, required supervision with set up for all activities of daily living (ADL) except required supervision of one person assist for bed mobility and toilet use, and received dialysis. Review of the physician orders for Resident #270 revealed an order dated 12/18/22 for a 1000…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the appropriate state agency (The Ohio Department of Mental Health) of a significant change in a resident's mental health condition as required. This affected one resident (#91) of one resident reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR). The facility census was 309. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension (high blood pressure), and major depressive disorder. Review of the psychiatric consult note for Resident #74, dated 11/02/22, revealed Resident #91 was given a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. This diagnosis was reflected and dated as such throughout Resident #91's medical record. Review of the medical record for Resident #91 revealed no evidence the appropriate state agency (The Ohio Department of Mental Health) was notified of the new diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to date or change oxygen tubing for Residents #188 and #255 and failed to have a physician order for oxygen administration for Resident #188. This affected two residents (#188 and #255) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 309. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #188's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/18 with diagnoses including disease of spinal cord, abnormalities of breathing, obstructive sleep apnea, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #188 was cognitively intact, required limited assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #188's April 2023 physician orders revealed no orders for oxygen administration. Observation on 04/10/23 at 11:08 A.M. of Resident #188 in the room with oxygen administered at four- and one-half liters per minute (LPM) via nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #270 was assessed and monitored for complications after hemodialysis treatments and failed to provide proof of ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. This affected one resident (#270) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis. The facility census was 309. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #270 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #270 was cognitively intact, required supervision with set up for all activities of daily living (ADL) except required supervision of one person assist for bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #270 received dialysis. Review of Resident #270's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/16/22 for dialysis treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This affected one resident (#278) of three reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 309. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #278 revealed an admission date of 03/08/23 with diagnoses including left femur fracture, reduced mobility, hypertension, and edema. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #278 was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, and hygiene, extensive assistance of two people for transfers and toileting, and limited assistance of one person for eating. Review of the physician's orders for March 2023 revealed Resident #278 was admitted to hospice services on 03/21/23 with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Interview on 04/18/23 at 1:13 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there was no record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control practices, including hand washing and use of gloves during wound care for Resident #61 and intravenous medication administration for Resident #641. This affected one resident (#61) of six residents reviewed for wounds, and one resident (#641) of two residents reviewed for intravenous medication administration. The census was 309. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic osteomyelitis with draining sinus of left femur, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left thigh with necrosis of bone and non-pressure ulcer of left thigh with necrosis of muscle. Review of the physician orders for Resident #61 revealed an order dated 04/04/23 to instill chlorhexidine (antiseptic) into canals with twelve-inch catheter attached to a normal saline syringe for five minutes; remove catheter; wipe skin with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,221 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,221 — penalty dated 2025-02-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROSENBERG, AVRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/03/2025
ROSENBERG, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 12/19/2023
LILIESTEDT, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2023
TAMASKAR, RANJITIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2023
ROSENBERG, JONATHANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2025
ROSENBERG, MOSHEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$43.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-50.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$467per resident / day
operating cost
$14,195per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$310per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365094. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next