Shore Pointe Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 145.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and a review of medical records and pertinent facility documents on 11/12/25, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2) with a known history of wandering behaviors, who eloped from the facility on 10/29/25. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #2). During the survey, a finding which constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified under 42 CFR 483.25 (d)(2) F 689, as the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2) with a known history of wandering behaviors who eloped from the facility on 10/29/2025. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 who was assigned to Resident #2 last observed the resident at approximately 4:45 p.m. on 10/29/2025. At approximately 5:05 p.m. Resident #2's assigned Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA) #1 went to the resident's room and observed the resident was not in there. CNA #1 then initiated a search for the resident in the dining room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent unintended insidious (gradual but with harmful effects) weight loss of 31.5 pounds (lbs.) in one year from 1/3/24 through 1/1/25, and significant weight losses to include a 14 lb./10.5% loss in 6 months from 4/2/24 through 9/2/24; a 15 lb./11.2% loss in 6 months from 5/5/24 through 10/1/24; a 6.5 lb./5.6% loss in 1 month from 11/1/24 through 12/3/24; and an additional 4 lb. loss from 12/3/24 through 1/1/25; which was also a 16.5 lb./13.4% loss in 6 months from 8/1/24 through 1/1/25. The facility failed to prevent and address these weight losses in a timely manner, which included the failure to a.) ascertain (to find out) food preferences, b.) implement fortified foods (foods that are nutrient dense in calories and protein), c.) provide culturally appropriate alternate meal options d.) implement and monitor weekly weights, and e.) consistently monitor intake and record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) reviewed and approved the menus (American and Korean) for nutritional adequacy and in accordance with nationally accredited standards, and b.) residents received care planned and physician ordered fortified foods for 3 of 3 residents (Resident's #41, 71 and 118) reviewed for food. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/2/25 at 9:46 AM, two surveyors toured the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), the Regional RD and the Assistant Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (ALNHA). At that time, the FSD stated that the facility followed a three-week cycle menu (a menu prepared in advance which was repeated after three weeks). On 1/2/25 at 10:38 AM, the surveyor met with the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant DON (ADON). At that time, the LNHA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2025-01-09 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) was dedicated solely to the infection prevention and control program (IPCP) from 8/9/24 and ongoing. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: State of New Jersey Department of Health Executive Directive No 20-026-1 dated October 20, 2020, revealed the following: ii. Required Core Practices for Infection Prevention and Control: Facilities are required to have one or more individuals with training in infection prevention and control employed or contracted on a full-time basis or part-time basis to provide on-site management of the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) program. The requirements of this Directive may be fulfilled by: a. An individual certified by the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology or meets the requirements under N.J.A.C. 8:39-20.2; or b. A Physician who has completed an infectious disease fellowship; or c. A healthcare professional licensed and in good…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' environment and living areas in a sanitary and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #90 and Resident #125) having lunch in the East Unit Sunshine Room in wheelchairs or recliners and 1 of 2 residents (Resident #124) utilizing overbed tables. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 1/02/25 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #90 out of bed, in a recliner in the Sunshine Room. A bead [NAME] activity center was noted on an overbed table in front of the resident. The resident was noted with closed eyes. No distress was noted. On 1/06/25 at 12:07 PM, the surveyor observed facility staff sitting next to Resident #90 in the Sunshine Room providing verbal cues/assisting as needed with lunch. The surveyor observed Resident #90's recliner with dried brown substances on sides of recliner. A review of the admission record reflected that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report and initiate an investigation for an injury of unknown origin in accordance with their abuse and neglect policy until surveyor inquiry. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/2/25 at 10:44 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #47 in bed. The resident had a line down the bridge of their nose with a reddish/brown colored marking and a dried scab. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident but the resident was not responding to the surveyor. On 1/3/25 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the surveyor with two investigations for Resident #47 from August 2024 and October 2024. The DON verified that there were two investigations in the past six (6) months and no other investigations. A review of the two investigations for Resident #47 revealed that there was no investigation regarding a marking on the resident's nose. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REFER to F759 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable professional standards of clinical practice by borrowing a medication (Lidocaine 4% patch) from another resident's supply. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) nurses observed during medication administration for one (1) of six (6) residents, (Resident #122). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REFER to F658 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the morning medication administration observation on 1/3/25, the surveyor observed three (3) nurses administer medications to six (6) residents. There were 27 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 7.4%. The deficient practices were identified for one (1) of six (6) residents, (Resident #122), that were administered medications by one (1) of three (3) nurses that were observed. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: On 1/3/25 at 8:59 AM, during the morning medication administration pass, the surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN#1) at the door of Resident #122's room with the medication cart. RN#1 stated that she was about to administer the resident's eye drops and patches. RN#1 showed the surveyor the container of eye drops, and two (2) packages labeled Max Strength Aspercreme with 4% Lidocaine pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP)(designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) to address the risk for infection transmission, in accordance with the facility policy and acceptable standards of infection control practice. This was observed for 2 of 3 unsampled residents (Resident #99 and #Resident #106) reviewed for EBP on 2 of 2 units (North Unit and East Unit) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/03/25 at 07:58 AM, during incontinence rounds with the Acting Unit Manager / Infection Preventionist (UM/IP) on the North Unit, the surveyor observed the UM/IP approach unsampled Resident #99 who was lying in bed. The UM/IP donned gloves, asked permission to check the resident's brief, the resident granted permission. The UM/IP pulled down Resident #99's pants, opened the brief, pulled down the front of the brief, and allowed the surveyor to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #165453; 159439; 156933; 164687 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for the residents. This deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 nursing units, (the 100, 200, and 300 units) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/23 at 12:54 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor observed that the window in the resident's room had a portable air conditioning unit which had a piece of cardboard surrounding the cylinder that was positioned outside of the window. The cardboard was observed to be bent, exposing outside air. On 09/22/23 at 8:50 AM, on the 300 unit, the surveyor was standing in Resident #104 and Resident #149's room and observed a small black bug flying around the room. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was also in the room at the time of the surveyor's observation. The surveyor asked the CNA if she saw the bug and the CNA did not respond to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ#: 159439; 165453 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 3 nursing units, (the 200 and the 300 unit), for 4 of 29 residents, (Resident #17, #64, #104 and #149), reviewed for concerns related to pests, and by 5 out of 6 alert and oriented residents during the Resident Council meeting. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/23, the surveyor toured the 200 unit and observed dead insects on the floors in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. At 11:16 AM, on the 200 unit, the surveyor observed a fly on Resident #17's forehead. At that time, the resident stated that the facility had, quite a few flies. Resident #64, the roommate, told the surveyor that the facility supposedly fumigated a couple of days ago. The surveyor asked if the residents had seen bugs in their rooms since. Both residents told the surveyor that they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and review of medical record it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident's personal preference to wear a specific urinary collection device (leg bag) during the day while the resident was out of bed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 29 residents reviewed, (Resident #25) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/23 at 11:19 AM, during tour the surveyor observed the resident sitting up in his/her wheelchair in their room. The resident was interviewed at this time and stated that he/she had an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident stated that he/she wore a leg bag (urine collection storage bag) during the day and a urinary drainage storage bag at night that hung on the resident's bedframe. According to the admission Record, Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to: heart failure, history of urinary tract infections (UTI), benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate), and obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$135,795 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $108,154 — penalty dated 2025-11-17
• $27,641 — penalty dated 2025-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ