No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rose Mountain Care Center

Route 1 & 18, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 · For profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (732) 828-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (732) 828-2400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Sep 2023
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
137 Livingston Ave · (732) 545-0051 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
92 Remsen Ave · (732) 846-0319 · Call to confirm hours
Park
294 Comstock St · (732) 745-5112 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.3%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.7%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.2%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%8.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.972.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.581.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.4%CMS range 34.0–63.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 5.6–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge80.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.2–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
25.3%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 93.1 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-29)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide qualified interpreter services for a resident identified as having a language barrier. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for language and communication.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 5/13/2026 at 9:32 AM during initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #5 laying in his/her bed speaking a foreign language later identified as Spanish. The surveyor introduced self to the resident who responded in Spanish. A review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 04/30/2026 revealed under section B that Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating Resident #5 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed under section A, that Resident #5's preferred language was Spanish and that an interpreter was needed to communicate. A review of Resident #5's personalized care plan revealed a focus of potential for difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services based upon current standards of practice to document urinary output in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 7) investigated for Urinary Catheter.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 05/14/2026 at 9:35 AM, Resident #7 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the Dining Room reading a magazine. At that time Resident #7 stated that he/she had a urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) but no longer has one. On 05/18/2026 at 12:37 PM during an interview, the Unit Manager (UM) stated that Resident #7 does have a urinary catheter.A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; An assessment tool) dated 04/16/2026 revealed under section, C that Resident #7 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; a brief assessment to determine cognitive status) of 11, indicating the resident had moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 forms) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for 1 of 3 forms provided. The evidence was as follows:On 5/19/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided DEA 222 forms which revealed one of the three provided forms Part 5, had not been completed upon receipt of the medications from the provider pharmacy as instructed on the reverse of the ordering form. The following forms were reviewed:Order form number:260545518-voided260545519- Part 5 was not completed to include number received and date received.260545520- awaiting pharmacy delivery. On 5/19/2026 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor and the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the provided DEA 222 forms in the presence of the survey team. The DON acknowledged she should have completed Part 5 as instructed on the reverse of the DEA 222 form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident # 89) reviewed under the Infection Control task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/13/2026 at 10:20 AM while in the hallway outside of Resident # 89's room. Outside of the room was a sign that revealed, Stop: Enhanced Barrier Precautions Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting . At that time, the surveyor observed a Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) in the room providing care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) carry out activities per a resident's care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #25), and b.) conduct on-going activity assessments to determine resident's interests, hobbies, and cultural preferences to acquire a meaningful life for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #3, #21, #25, #83, #84) reviewed for activities. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/3/2024 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 lying in bed. Resident #25's family member was present and stated that the resident was supposed to be getting a daily newspaper in their preferred language. On 12/5/2024 at 8:27 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 lying in bed and no newspaper was available. On 12/5/2024 at 9:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 lying in bed and no newspaper available. On 12/5/2024 at 9:49 AM, the Activities Director (AD) was interviewed. The AD stated that she had been AD for only a few weeks. The AD stated that when a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility activities program was directed by a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or activity professional. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 12/03/2024 at 9:58 AM, Surveyor #1 observed a family member in resident #25's room. The family member stated they were upset because Resident #25 was supposed to be getting a daily newspaper in their language, but no newspapers were being delivered. On 12/04/24 at 9:19 AM, Surveyor #2 observed a staff assisting residents at mealtime in the main dining room. The staff identified herself as the Staffing Coordinator/ Lead Certified Nursing Aide (SC/LCNA). On 12/05/2024 at 9:49 AM, Surveyor #1 observed activities taking place in the main dining area. Surveyor #1 interviewed a staff member who introduced herself as the Activities Director (AD). The AD stated she had been the AD for two weeks and prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0712 — widespread
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents a.) conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least every thirty days for the first ninety days of admission, b.) were seen by the physician or nurse practitioner every thirty days with a physician visit at least every sixty days, and c.) documented an admission History and Physical (H&P) within 72 hours of a resident's admission to the facility. This deficient practice was observed for 4 of 18 residents and 1 closed record (Resident #13, #33, #81, #83 and #85) reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/05/24 at 09:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #33 sitting in the wheelchair, in their room. The resident informed the surveyor that he/she did not see a doctor regularly. The resident stated I saw a doctor about 2 weeks ago and I did not know who he was, and he stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were explicitly informed of and understanding was assessed prior to having the residents enter into a arbitration agreement which was identified as a mandatory part of the admission Agreement for 9 of 9 Residents who attended a resident council meeting (Resident #6, #11, #20, #21, #24, #27, #40, #71, #78) and was evidenced by the following: On 12/03/24 at 10:07 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Liscensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services Registered Nurse (VPRN). The surveyor asked if the facility utilized arbitration agreements. The LNHA stated absolutely, we offer arbitration and it is in their admission agreement. The LNHA then stated, but it is a separate area, and it is overseen by legal. The surveyor requested a list of all the residents that had signed the arbitration agreements. The VPRN stated there is no one in an active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure a process was in place to identify residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention used to reduce the transmission of resistant organisms in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), by posting clear signage outside of resident rooms indicating the type of Protective Personal Equipment (PPE) to be worn and defining the high risk resident care activities associated with EBP for 8 of 8 EBP rooms, b.) provide residents with hand hygiene (hh) and ensure staff performed hh in between serving and setting up residents with meals, c.) remove contaminated gloves prior to walking around in a non-clinical area, the dining room and making contact with multiple residents, d.) ensure the ice containers on 2 of 2 units were dated and had self-draining holders, and e.) use hh after touching a cell phone and prior to assisting to feed a resident who was dependent on staff for eating for 1 resident (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) meals were consistently provided in a dignified and homelike manner, and b) provide resident meal assistance in a dignified manner. The deficient practice was observed in the main dining room, for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #33 & #48) and on 2 of 2 units (East and West). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a) On 12/03/24 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor #1 observed the meal service in the main dining room. A staff member brought a tray over to Resident #33, who had just returned from the smoking area. The staff did not offer Resident #33 hand hygiene upon re-entering from the smoking area. The staff then proceeded to set up the resident's meal, without removing the food items from tray, then she dropped a peanut butter and jelly sandwich on the floor. The staff then proceeded to pick the sandwich up from the floor and placed the soiled sandwich in the tray lid that was face up, along with the other trash, which was directly in front of the resident meal tray. Surveyor #1 continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure a cognitively impaired resident was provided with adequate supervision to prevent falls with injury and reassess, reevaluate, and implement appropriate fall interventions to the Care Plan (CP) for a resident who was at high risk for falls, and sustained multiple falls. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #39), and b) ensure the facility, developed and implemented a consistent smoking process to prevent potential injury or fire. The deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents (#11, #33, #54, #63 and #388) reviewed for smoking and was evidenced by the following: a) On 12/04/24 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #39 seated at a table by themselves in the main dining room, was drinking a beverage, and was observed wearing slippers on their feet and no leg rests were observed on the wheelchair. On 12/04/24 at 11:14 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment included a) an assessment of the needs of the population of residents who smoked and included policy, services, and staff competencies for those residents, and b.) for the Asian American populations which identified ethnic, cultural, religious preferences and staff competencies. The deficient practice affected residents who resided on both the East and [NAME] wing of the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F679 and F689 On 12/03/2024 at 8:50 AM, two surveyors were present in the conference room and requested the surveyor information from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding residents who smoked, the smoking policy, and smoking times. On 12/03/2024 at 9:34 AM, in the presence of the two surveyors, the LNHA provided smoking hours, a list of 14 residents who smoke, and a document Smoking Rules and Agreement. When asked about the smoking policy, the LNHA explained that the Smoking Rules and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview on 12/4/2024 in the presence of the Maintenance Director (MD), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure corner guards were free from sharp edges and failed to provide protective endcaps to corner guards. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents on the east wing and was evidenced by the following: An observation at 2:27 PM with the MD, revealed two metal corner guards by the handrails in the main dining room had a sharp edge and no protective endcaps installed to prevent an injury. In an interview at the time, the MD confirmed the findings. The facility's Administrator was notified of the deficient practice at Life Safety Code survey exit conference on 12/5/2024 at 2:45 PM. NJAC 8:39-31.4(a)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by administering medications to a resident who was in the dining room for the breakfast meal. This deficient practice was identified for 1 resident (Resident #83) during the meal observation and was evidenced by the following: On 12/06/2024 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed a Registered Nurse (RN) #1 approach Resident #83 sitting alone at a table in the main dining area preparing to eat breakfast which was on the table. RN #1 administered Resident #83 medications and exited the area. The surveyor observed there were multiple other residents throughout the main dining area as well. On 12/06/2024 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor inquired about administering medications in the dining area in front of other residents during breakfast. RN #1 stated Resident #83 was already in the dining room and that the resident needed to take the medications. The RN further stated the purpose of not administering medications in the dining area was because the resident could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care to residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #19 and #33) reviewed for nail care and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/3/24 at 10:19 AM, during an initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #19 sitting in their bed. The surveyor observed the resident's fingernails to be long, jagged with a brown colored substance underneath the nails. On 12/4/24 at 9:14 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #19 lying in their bed. Resident #19 had long, jagged nails with brown colored substance underneath the fingernails. When asked by the surveyor, the resident stated staff did not cut their nails. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #19 which revealed: A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; glaucoma (an eye disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored and dated in accordance with professional standards when not in use for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #36) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to store foods, maintain sanitation in a safe, and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/18/23 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following: 1. In the freezer the surveyor found one opened box of breaded eggplant without an open and use by date. The interior bag holding the eggplant strips were opened and unlabeled. The FSD stated, that the exterior of the box should be labeled with the open and used by date. She also stated, the interior bag once opened should be label and dated. 2. In the freezer the surveyor found one opened box of pancakes. The exterior of the box was labeled with 8/31 (no year was indicated). The FSD could not explain if 8/31 was a received on, used by, or open date. The interior bag holding 24 pancakes was opened and unlabeled. The FSD stated, that the exterior of the box should be labeled with the open and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to treat all residents in a dignified manner. This deficient practice occurred for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #14 and #67) and was evidenced by the following: On 9/20/23 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor met with Residents #8, #14, #27, and #67 for the Resident Council meeting (RCm) in a closed-door meeting. During the RCm, the surveyor followed the probes (the process of asking questions and examining facts in a situation) in the survey process, in question #18 for if resident rights were being respected in a dignified manner, Residents #14 and #67 both claimed they were not. On that same date and time, both residents informed the surveyor that staff at times do not knock before entering their room. Resident #14 stated that he/she was unable to remember the name of the staff and that it happened a few times on both morning and afternoon shifts. At that time, a staff wearing a green scrub (the sanitary clothing worn by physicians,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint# NJ00166296 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was identified that the facility failed to provide the residents with a safe, comfortable, clean, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified in a) one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #142) reviewed for environment concerns, b) the dining, and c) the laundry area observed and reviewed for a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment of residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed Resident #142's medical records. The admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic multifocal osteomyelitis (a disease that causes pain and damage in bones due to inflammation) right femur (right thigh bone), muscle weakness, anemia unspecified (when blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells), other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 9/20/23 at 02:45 PM, the surveyor reviewed the reportable event record/report AAS-45 (FRE; Facility Reported Event) dated 7/10/23 that was provided by the facility which included the following: Today's Date: 7/10/2023 Date of Event: 7/06/2023 Time of Event: unk [unknown] Was This a Significant Event? Yes Was Significant Event Called in? Yes Date: 7/10/2023 Time: 5:15 PM Type of Incident: Staff-to-Resident Abuse Narrative: 1) Describe the event . Resident #56 allegedly told Responsible Party (RP) that while changing his/her diaper the individual described as [redacted] slapped resident's forearm. He/she said that since the alleged incident, he/she has not seeing [seen] the person again . 3) What interventions were implemented after the incident/event? . Skin assessment reveals with no redness or bruising noted and Resident #56 was assessed and does not report any pain or discomfort. Resident #56 alleged incident happened in the evening to RP but upon his/her interviewed told the nurse it happened in the day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints: #NJ00164042, # NJ00166566, NJ#165848 Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of staff to resident abuse in accordance with federal and state requirements for the timing of reporting such allegations of abuse to the state agency. The deficient practice was identified for four (4) of six (6) investigations of reportable incidents reviewed (Residents #10, #13, #56 and #82). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/19/23 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing home administrator (LNHA) for a copy of Resident #10, #13 and #82 Incident/Accident and Reportable (I/A&R) reports for the last five (5) months, and the LNHA stated that he will get back to the surveyor. A review of the provided I/A&R reflected that Complaint #NJ00164042 and # NJ00166566 were both reported beyond the required timeframe as follows: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for five (5) of five (5) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for mandatory education. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor requested five (5) random CNA education files within a year according to their date of hire. A review of the facility form, Continuing Education Record for 2022 to 2023 revealed the log did not include the mandated QAPI education training for CNA#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5. On 9/27/23 at 12:06 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Practical Nurse / Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Infection Preventionist /Education Co-Ordinator (EC) stated she received an informal training from the previous ADON. At that time, the EC stated the QAPI education training was for the director and managers. We have not done it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire. This deficient practice was identified for six (6) of ten (10) newly hired staff reviewed, (Staff #1, #2, #6, #7 #8, and #9). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/28/23 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed nine randomly selected new employee files for license verification which revealed the following: Staff #1, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), hired 10/24/21, had a New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) online Public Registry license verification printout (used to verify the status of a CNA's license and to check the nurse aide registry) which did not include the date that the verification was done. Staff #2, a Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA), hired 12/20/21, had a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs license verification printout (used to verify the status of a licensed professional other than a CNA) which had accurate as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan to address the discharge plan for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for closed record, (Resident #90) reviewed for a comprehensive person-centered care plan. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #90's medical records. The admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diffuse traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness (following trauma, secondary diffuse brain injury), major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified (COPD; a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), other seizures (caused by rapid and uncoordinated electrical firing in the brain), and anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). The admission Minimum Data Set (aMDS), an assessment tool used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order for one (1) of nineteen (19) residents reviewed (Resident #5). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey stated, The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey stated, The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that: a) a physician order for discharge (d/c) was obtained for two (2) of two (2) residents (Resident #84 and #142) and b) d/c summary was completed by the physician for one (1) of two (2) residents who were transferred to another facility (Resident #142) reviewed for d/c. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #84. The admission Record (or AR; face sheet; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses that were not limited to malignant neoplasm of the pancreatic duct (most common malignant tumor of the pancreas), type two diabetes mellitus without complications (a chronic disease affecting blood glucose regulation), unspecified lack of coordination, and muscle weakness. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (aMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a communication device for a resident identified as having language barrier. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #39) reviewed for language and communication deficits and was evidenced by the following: On 9/18/23 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed the resident lying in bed, who waived to the surveyor. The surveyor observed the menu in the Resident's room was written in both English and Chinese. The English Activities Communication Calendar in Resident #39's room was dated September 2023, and the Chinese Activities Communication Calendar was dated June 2023. On 9/18/23 at 12:08 PM, the surveyor called the family for interview and did not receive a response. On 9/19/23 at 10:40 AM, the resident was observed lying in bed, waived to the surveyor and pulled the blanket over his/her shoulders. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #39. The resident's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #39 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interviews, review of the facility closed record, and the review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) follow the physicians' orders for consultation for two (2) of 22 residents (Residents# 12 and #89) and b) ensure that the physician documented a recapitulation (a summary) of resident's stay at the facility and visit progress notes in accordance with the resident's care and professional standards of clinical practice for two (2) of 22 residents, (Residents#12 and #89) reviewed for quality of care and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to implement and document in the resident's care plan a new intervention after each fall in order to prevent any additional falls for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for falls (Resident #2). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/18/23 at 11:09 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 seated in a wheelchair in the dayroom. Resident #2 did not speak English. The surveyor interviewed the resident via an interpreter that was an employee of the facility and the resident stated that he/she was very good. The surveyor reviewed Resident #2's medical record. The admission Record (or face sheet; admission summary) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to; cerebrovascular disease (a term for conditions that affect blood flow to your brain), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) monitor residents returning from the dialysis center for hemodialysis access site and vital signs (clinical measurements, specifically pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure, that indicate the state of a patient's essential body functions) and b) complete the Hemodialysis Communication Record (HCR), post dialysis treatment according to standard of practice, policy, and facility practice. The deficient practice was observed for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #7) reviewed for hemodialysis. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents' highest practical wellbeing by failing to: a.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey (NJ) and b.) ensure that 7 AM-3 PM, 3-11 PM, and 11-7 shifts were staffed to provide the ADLs (activities of daily living) for three (3) of 16 residents, (Residents#2, #35, and #67) according to facility practice, required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of NJ, and facility assessment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted Resident Care Staffing Report (24-hour staffing report) was up to date and provided accurate information. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/18/23 at 9:18 AM, the surveyors entered the facility and observed the posted 24-hour staffing report which was dated 9/15/23. The census listed was 90. The staffing report was not up to date and it was three days late. On 9/23/23 at 11:26 AM, the surveyors observed the posted 24-hour staffing report which was dated 9/19/23. The census listed was 91. The staffing report was not up to date and it was four days late. On 9/25/23 at 8:35 AM, the surveyor observed the posted 24- hour staffing report which was dated 9/22/23. The census listed was 90. The staffing report was not up to date and it was three days late. On 9/25/23 at 10:36 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided copies of the facility daily census report from 9/15/23 to 9/25/23 and reflected as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's dietary preferences were consistently identified and implemented including the approprite hours of sleep snacks (HS snacks) for one (1) of 19 residents, (Resident #7) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 9/19/23 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #7 seated on the edge of their bed with breakfast tray on the bedside table. There were no visible menus in the room for the resident to review. The residents breakfast meal was on his/her bedside table, the ticket only read, scrambled eggs, double portion. The preference and the dislike columns were blank. On 9/19/23 at 10:24 AM, during the interview the surveyor asked the resident about how he/she like their breakfast tray? The resident stated, not really, I don't get to choose my meals. I get to talk to the dietician but no I do not fill out a menu for what I want. I have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for a resident. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice and End of Life services (Resident #51) and was evidenced by the following: On 9/18/23 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #51 sleeping on their right-hand side and was covered with a thin blanket. The surveyor reviewed Resident #51's medical record. Resident # 51 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (decline in memory), lack of coordination, hypothyroidism, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, malnutrition, muscle weakness, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids), difficulty walking, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Alzheimer's disease ((A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior. This is a gradually progressive condition) and urinary tract infection. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent provided facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) identify a resident and offer a subsequent pneumococcal vaccine and b) revise the facility pneumococcal vaccine policy to reflect the current Pneumococcal vaccination guidelines in accordance with the CDC's (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines for one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #14) reviewed for immunization. This deficient and was evidenced by the following: Reference: A review of the CDC guidelines for Pneumococcal vaccination included: For adults who only received the Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax/PPSV 23) regardless of risk and condition, should received one (1) dose of Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV 15 or PCV20) at least one year after the most recent PPSV23. On 9/21/23 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #14 in the patio, light his/her cigarette and began smoking. The surveyor reviewed the medical records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility staff had the mandatory behavioral health training for two (2) of the five (5) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA #3 and CNA #5) reviewed for mandatory education. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor requested five (5) random CNA education files within a year according to their date of hire. A review of the facility form, Continuing Education Record for 2022 to 2023 revealed the log did not include the mandated behavioral health education training for CNA#3 and #5. On 9/27/23 at 12:06 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Practical Nurse / Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Infection Preventionist /Education Co-Ordinator (EC) stated she received an informal training from the previous ADON. At that time, the surveyor and the EC reviewed the Continuing Education Record for the five (5) random CNAs. The EC opened a binder an showed the surveyor an In-Service (continuing education) attendance sign-in sheet for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROSENBERG, ESTHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/01/1988
ROSENBERG, JONATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/01/1988
ROSE MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATESOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1988
STERN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
ABBOUD, WALIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
POLLAK, SOLOMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 6%Other / private 10%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$312per resident / day
operating cost
$9,479per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315384. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next