The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Great Neck

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 311 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 205 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 214 beds and averages 210.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-04-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during a Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey initiated on 3/23/2022 and completed on 4/1/2022, the facility failed to Maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise; the facility failed to reassess the resident after the weight loss was identified and failed to notify the Physician and the Dietician to implement interventions to address and monitor the unplanned weight loss. The facility's failure to implement an existing weight monitoring policy and failure to monitor each residents' nutritional intake was identified for two (Resident #45 and Resident #80) of seven residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, 1) Resident #45 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Legal blindness, and a recent history of COVID-19 infection was identified as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Resident #71 was observed with tissues and rubber bands wrapped around two fingers on multiple occasions and Nursing staff did not revise the comprehensive care plan to address the resident's behavior. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, last reviewed in January 2024, documented behavior symptoms will be identified using a facility-approved behavior screening tool and a comprehensive assessment. The care plan will incorporate findings from the comprehensive assessment and be consistent with current standards of practice. The facility's policy titled Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #260) of three residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #260 was admitted on [DATE] after a Micra Leadless Pacemaker Implantation (electronic device that is implanted in the body to monitor heart rate and rhythm) and required pacemaker remote monitoring. The facility did not initiate the pacemaker remote monitoring until 7/11/2024 and there was no documented Physician Order for the monitoring until 7/15/2024, seven days after Resident #260 was admitted to the facility. The finding is: The facility's admission Notes policy dated 1/2022 documented preliminary resident information shall be documented upon a resident's admission to the facility including a brief description of any disabilities, prosthesis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility. This was identified for one (Resident #135) of two residents reviewed for Rehabilitation Services. Specifically, the Rehabilitation Department recommended a floor ambulation program for Resident #135, however, the floor ambulation program was not completed. The finding is: The facility's Restorative Nursing Rehab Program Floor Ambulation policy, last reviewed on 1/2023, documented each resident will receive the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care including but not limited to restorative services. The ambulation program refers to the activity of walking that provides weight-bearing that promotes bone health and joint mobility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who are incontinent of bowel and bladder received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent Urinary Tract Infection. This was evident for one (Resident #117) of three residents reviewed for Activities for Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #117 required total assistance from one caregiver for toileting and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #117 was observed wearing a urine-soaked brief and had wet linens underneath them on 7/11/2024 at 11:11 AM. The resident was last changed on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift before the observation. The findings is: The facility Resident Care with Activities of Daily Living policy and procedure, last updated on 1/2024, documented the resident will be offered toileting assistance or incontinent care twice per shift and as needed. The policy documented that staff must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #57) of four residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #57 had a Physician's Order to receive 4 liters of oxygen therapy per minute via mist collar to a tracheostomy continuously. However, on multiple occasions, Resident #57 was observed receiving 6 liters of oxygen per minute via mist collar to their tracheostomy. The finding is: The facility's Assessing Oxygen Saturation Policy, last revised in January 2024, documented to assess the resident for the following signs and symptoms of impaired oxygen saturation: altered respirations, difficulty breathing, and abnormal breath sounds. The policy further documented to notify the Physician if the oxygen saturation level…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not ensure it obtained laboratory services to meet the needs of each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions. Specifically, Resident #41 was receiving the antibiotic Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (a bacteria that causes serious infection) in the urine and mastoid bone (the bone behind the ear) and the Physician ordered a Vancomycin trough level (a laboratory test used to determine therapeutic dosage) to be drawn on 7/9/2024. There was no documented evidence in the resident's medical record that the laboratory order was completed. The finding is: The facility's Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results Clinical Protocol, last reviewed 1/2024, documented the Physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on diagnostic and monitoring needs. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/11/2024 and completed on 7/18/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #112) of six residents reviewed in the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, Resident #112 had a physician's order for Strict Contact Precautions for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (a type of bacteria) in the urine which required the use of Personal Protective Equipment including a gown and gloves. The Licensed Practical Nurse (Medication Nurse) #1 was observed on 7/12/2024 entering the room without wearing a gown and gloves and administered medications to Resident #112. The finding is: The facility's Initiation of Transmission-Based Precautions policy, last revised on 1/2024, documented it is the policy of the facility to prevent the spread of infection within…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/23/2022 and completed on 4/1/2022, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident as determined by resident assessment and individual plans of care. This was identified through staff interviews, resident council task, review of facility assessment and staffing assignments. Specifically, 1) The facility nursing staffing assignments did not reflect the staffing needs as indicated in the facility assessment; 2) Resident #136 did not receive wound care treatment as prescribed by the Physician on multiple occasions 3) Resident #358 received 6 medications and 1 supplement 3 hours later than the prescribed time to be administered; 4) Resident #99 did not have a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assigned on the 7-3 shift to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/23/2022 and completed on 4/1/2022 the facility did not ensure that pharmaceutical services including administration of all medications was provided to meet the needs of all residents. This was identified for one (Resident #358) of one resident reviewed for Pharmacy Services. Specifically, on 3/25/2022 Registered Nurse (RN) #3 did not administer 9 AM Physician-ordered medications to Resident #358 timely. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised on 1/2022, documented medications must be administered in accordance with the [Physician's] orders, including any required time frame, and medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. As per the Physician's History and Physical dated 3/21/2022, Resident #358 was admitted with diagnoses including Asthma, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, and Hypertension. As per the Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/23/2022 and completed on 4/1/2022, the facility did not ensure resident rights to be free from neglect. This was identified for one (Resident #99) of five residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL). Specifically, Resident #99 required staff assistance for ADL and incontinence care. The resident did not receive ADL and incontinence care on 3/25/2022 from 6:14 AM until 12:15 PM. The resident was observed in bed with a strong urine odor in their room. Resident #99 was visibly upset, clenching their lips and stated with an elevated loud tone that no one took care of them today. The resident stated they were wet and had been asking for staff assistance all morning; however, no staff came to assist. The finding is: The Abuse Prohibition policy last updated January 2022 documented Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility and its employees and service providers to provide goods and services to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GRAND HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY