The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 178.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2604348) the facility did not ensure that investigation and investigation results of all alleged violations involving abuse were reported within a timely manner to the New York State Department of Health. This was evident in 01(one) out of 05 (five) residents sampled (Residents #1). Specifically, the facility received a report on 08/05/2025 that Resident #1 alleged Licensed Practical Nurse #1 twisted their arm while redirecting Resident #1 to leave the room of another Resident. The facility did not report the allegations to the State Agency.The findings include:The Review of the facility policy, entitled Abuse dated 01/2025 documented all reports of resident abuse, shall be promptly reported to state agencies and investigated by the facility. Findings of abuse will also be reported.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, asthma and diabetes mellitus. The review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for two (Resident #16 and #158) two residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, 1) Registered Nurse #1 was observed pulling Resident #16 in the Geri chair backward through the hallway to the dining room; and 2) Resident #158 was observed in their room sitting in a wheelchair and performing colostomy care in the presence of Certified Nursing Assistant #3. The privacy curtains were not drawn and the resident's exposed abdomen was visible from the hallway. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Dignity, dated 1/2024, documented that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00372615) initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident's right to receive written notices, including the reason for the changes, before the resident's room in the facility was changed. This was identified for one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for Notification of Change. Specifically, on 1/29/2025 Resident #61 was relocated to a new room on the same floor. The resident's representative was not informed and was not provided an explanation in writing of why the room change was required. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Room Change, last reviewed 1/2025 documented the Social Worker shall give the resident and their designated representative a minimum of 30 days (when possible) of written notice of the pending room change. All residents affected by a room change will receive a written and verbal notification of the change. Resident #61…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #65 was assessed to have a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (which involves full-thickness skin loss, exposing the subcutaneous tissue but not bone, tendon, or muscle) to the sacrum (the triangular bone at the lower back). The resident's last recorded weight was 78.9 pounds; however, the air mattress provided to assist with wound healing and to prevent new ulcers from developing was set at 450 pounds. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Use of Low Air Loss Mattress, dated 1/2025 documented the purpose of a low air loss mattress is to prevent and treat pressure wounds. The mattress is composed of multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025 the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible on one (Doric Unit) of five resident units. Specifically, on 6/1/2025 the Doric Unit (dementia unit) nursing station's two entries were observed with nylon belts secured below the knee height on each side of the nursing station desk (attached from the desk to the wall) to deter the wandering residents from entering the nursing station. There were multiple residents observed wandering in the hallway. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Hazardous Areas, Devices and Equipment, dated 1/2025 documented all hazardous areas, devices, and equipment in the facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure resident safety and mitigate accident hazards to the extent possible. A hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness, including equipment and devices that are left unattended or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment, care, and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was identified for one (Resident #108) of one resident reviewed for Tube Feeding. Specifically, Resident #108 with a diagnosis of Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and had a physician's order for aspiration precautions, was observed in bed receiving enteral (tube) feeding while lying flat on their back. The finding is: The facility policy titled, Enteral Nutrition last reviewed in January 2025 documented that the nurse must confirm enteral nutrition orders are completed. The [medical] provider may consider the need for supplemental orders including head of bed elevation. Staff caring for residents with feeding tubes are trained on how to recognize and report complications associated with the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure the nursing staffing data, including resident census, was posted daily at the beginning of each shift in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This was identified during the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing Task. Specifically, the Daily Nursing Staffing data was observed posted outside a conference room, which was not readily accessible to visitors or residents. Additionally, the Daily Nursing Staffing data sheet posted on 6/1/2025 had an inaccurate resident census for the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, last reviewed on 1/2025, documented that the facility will post, daily for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. The policy documented that within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed Nurses (Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not provide each resident behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This was identified for one (Resident #100) of four residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #100 was sent to the hospital on 3/24/2025 secondary to suicidal ideation, and returned to the facility on 3/25/2025. The resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was not updated to include individualized interventions to address and monitor the resident's behavior related to suicidal ideation. The finding is: The policy titled Suicide Threats last revised on 1/2025 documented that staff shall report any resident threats of suicide immediately to the Nurse Supervisor or Charge Nurse. A staff member shall remain with the resident until the Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in a locked compartment. This was identified for one (Resident #134) of three residents reviewed for Accident Hazards. Specifically, Resident #134's room was observed with a bottle of Lidocaine Aspercreme Pain Relief Cream (numbing pain relief cream for minor pain) on the overbed table, and there was no nursing staff in the vicinity. , Resident #134 did not have a Physician's order for the Lidocaine Aspercreme Pain Relief and was not assessed to self-administer their medication. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, last reviewed on 1/2025, documented that the facility stores all drugs and biologicals safely, securely, and orderly. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Compartments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/1/2025 and completed on 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, during the wound treatment observation for Resident #65's Stage 3 pressure ulcer (involves full-thickness skin loss, exposing the subcutaneous tissue but not bone, tendon, or muscle) to the sacrum (the triangular bone at the lower back), Registered Nurse #1 set up the clean wound care supplies on the resident's over bed table on a barrier without cleaning or sanitizing the table. The resident rolled on their back and the wound came in direct contact with the bed after the wound was cleansed. Registered Nurse #1 did not perform appropriate hand hygiene and changed their gloves while administering wound care treatment. The finding is: The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GRAND HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $965K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY