Mayfair Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 14.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 193.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/17/2024 and completed on 9/25/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible. This was identified for two (Resident #51 and Resident #165) of ten residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #51 had a history of falls and wandering behavior and the Comprehensive Care Plan directed staff to place the resident in a supervised area when awake. Resident #51 was left unsupervised in the hallway on 7/24/2024 at 1:10 AM and was found on the floor with injuries to the right side of their forehead and mouth. Subsequently, the resident was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage (brain bleed) and a Cervical Fracture (spine). 2) Resident #165, with a history of Suicidal Ideation was observed with an unattended disposable shaving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-03-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00305185) initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident was free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This was identified for one (Resident #140) of two residents reviewed for Resident-to-Resident Abuse. Specifically, on 11/8/2022, Resident #326, with intact cognition, verbalized that they are going to hit Resident #140 if the resident went to their room again. Soon after the verbal threat, Resident #326 went to Resident #140's room and was observed hitting Resident #140 in the head. Subsequently, Resident #140 was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with a left orbital (eye) skull fracture and bruising to the head. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #140 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program/Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol/Abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/17/2024 and completed on 9/25/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for 1) six (Resident #52, Resident #194, Resident #29, Resident # 32, Resident #1, Resident #50) of six residents reviewed for the Medication Storage and Labeling Task and 2) one (Resident #53) of three residents observed for infection Control Task. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #6 did not use an Environmental Protection Agency approved cleaning agent to sanitize the glucometer (a handheld device used to measure the concentration of sugar in the blood) machine after using the glucometer machine for each resident. 2) Resident #53 was on contact precautions for a Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (a multi-drug resident organism) infection to the right lower extremity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/17/2024 and completed on 9/25/2024 the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #75) of ten residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #75 was applying the Biofreeze Professional Pain-Relieving Gel to their knees and the facility staff was aware. A review of the resident's medical records revealed there was no assessment to determine if the resident could safely self-administer the medication. Additionally, Resident #75 did not have a Physician's Order to apply the Biofreeze Professional Pain-Relieving Gel. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Self-Administration of Medications, last revised on 1/2024 documented that as part of a resident's overall evaluation, the staff and the practitioner will assess each resident's mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/17/2024 and completed on 9/25/2024, the facility did not ensure an assessment was completed to accurately reflect the resident's status. This was identified for one (Resident #167) of one resident reviewed for Hospice and End of Life. Specifically, the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] did not reflect that Resident #167 received Hospice care. The finding is: The facility's policy titled MDS Assessment Coordinator, last reviewed on 1/2024 documented a Registered Nurse should be designated the responsibility of conducting and coordinating each resident's Minimum Date Set assessment. Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment must certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment by dating and signing the assessment and identifying each section completed. Resident #167 was admitted with diagnoses including Palliative Care, Cerebrovascular Disease, and Dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0801 — isolated
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure that a qualified Dietician is licensed or certified as a nutrition professional by the state in which the services are performed. This was identified for one (Registered Dietitian #1) of five employees reviewed for the Criminal History Record Check task. Specifically, part-time Registered Dietitian #1 did not have an active license or certification issued by the New York State as a Dietitian or nutrition professional since [DATE]. Registered Dietician #1 was hired by the facility on [DATE] and continued to work directly with the residents without documented evidence of being supervised by a qualified professional. The finding is: A review of Registered Dietitian #1's personnel file revealed that they were hired by the facility on [DATE] and their Dietetics-Nutrition license from New York State had expired on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence that Registered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/17/2024 and completed on 9/25/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident received food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences. This was identified for one (Resident #39) of eighteen residents reviewed during the dining task. Specifically, Resident #39 had a physician's order for a gluten-free diet (gluten is a protein found in grains like wheat, rye, and barley). During observations on 9/17/2024 and 9/19/2024, the resident was served white bread with their meal for lunch. The finding is: Resident #39 was admitted with diagnoses including Hypertension and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The Minimum Date Set assessment documented the resident was on a therapeutic diet. The Comprehensive Care Plan titled Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (NY 00311955) initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident representative was notified timely when there was a change in the resident's condition and a need to commence a new form of treatment was identified. This was identified for one (Resident #276) of two residents reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, Resident #276 was identified with significant weight loss of twenty-nine pounds in last six months and received intravenous fluids due to poor oral intake. The facility staff did not notify the resident's family in a timely manner of the resident's poor oral intake, significant weight loss, and administration of the Intravenous (IV) fluids in response to the poor oral intake. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled; Acute Condition Changes Clinical Protocol last reviewed 1/2023 did not address notification to the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (NY00311955) initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023 the facility did not ensure that a Baseline Care Plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care was developed within 48 hours of admission. This was identified for one (Resident #276) of four residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer (PU). Specifically, Resident #276 was admitted with a Sacral PU on 12/16/2022. A Baseline care plan for the Sacral Pressure Ulcer was not completed within 48 hours as required. The finding is: The facility's Baseline Care Plan policy reviewed 1/2023 documented to assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. The baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023, the facility did not ensure that high protein supplements were provided as ordered by a Physician. This was identified for one (Resident #128) of four residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #128 was assessed by the Registered Dietician (RD) on 10/13/2022 with recommendations to provide LPS (liquid protein supplement) and then again on 12/17/2022 with recommendation to provide LPS and Juven (a powdered protein supplement) to aid in wound healing. A Physician's order first documented on 12/17/2022 indicated to administer both LPS and Juven as per the RD's recommendations. There was no documented evidence in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that the resident received the LPS until 1/22/2023 and the Juven until 2/2/2023. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Enteral (tube) Nutrition last reviewed on 1/2022 documented that the Dietitian will monitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023, the facility did not ensure that the resident maintained, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. This was identified for one (Resident #128) of four residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #128 was not provided the adequate amount of protein via tube feeding that was needed for wound healing, as assessed and recommended by the Registered Dietician (RD). The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Enteral (tube) Nutrition last reviewed on 1/2022 documented that the Dietitian will monitor residents who are receiving enteral feedings and will make appropriate recommendations for interventions to enhance tolerance and nutritional adequacy of enteral feedings. The facility's policy titled, Nutrition and Hydration to Maintain Skin Integrity last reviewed on 1/2023 documented that the healing of acute (e.g., postoperative) and chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023, the facility did not ensure that the medical care of each resident was supervised by the Physician including monitoring changes in the resident's medical status. This was identified for one (Resident #7) of four residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The resident's Physician did not monitor the resident's blood work timely to evaluate the progression of the disease and need for treatment. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Diabetes - Clinical Protocol last reviewed on 2/2023 documented that the Physician will follow up on any acute episodes associated with a significant change in blood sugars or deterioration of previous glucose control and document resident status at subsequent visits until the acute situation is resolved. Resident #7 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,308 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $41,308 — penalty dated 2024-09-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GRAND HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY