Bridge View Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

19.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 196.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.91 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 10% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00348590), the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involved abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility of the facility and to other officials including to the State Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for judications in long term care facilities) . This was evident for one (1) out of seven (7) residents (Resident #5) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 07/18/2024 at 4:06 PM the hospital Social Worker reported to the Department of Health that Resident #5 reported that they were physically and sexually abused at the facility. Resident #5 also refused to be discharged back to the facility. The facility Director of Social Services was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00348590), the facility failed to initiate an investigation of an alleged violation of abuse. This was evident for one (1) out of seven (7) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 07/18/2024 at 4:06 PM the hospital Social Worker notified the facility's Director of Social Service that Resident #5 reported that they were physically and sexually abused while in the facility. Resident #5 also refused to be discharged back to the facility. The facility Director of Social Services did not immediately initiate an investigation to rule out abuse. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Abuse, neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating dated 01/2025 document that all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and to be thoroughly investigated by facility management.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 4/27/23 to 5/04/23, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for 4 (Units 3, Unit 4, Unit 5, Unit 6) of 5 Units. Specifically, 1) Unit 3 was observed with walls with mismatching paint, plaster, broken tiles, and holes throughout multiple rooms, loose cable wires, a shower room in disrepair, and radiators that were dirty and in disrepair, 2) Unit 4 was observed with missing window blind blades, torn wallpaper, and holes in the wall, and 3) Unit 6 was observed with white spackled paint in multiple rooms and radiator covers in disrepair. The findings are: 1.) On 04/27/23 at 10:10 AM, Unit 3 was observed with the following: a) Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] had a sink not firmly affixed to the wall, broken wall tiles, missing borders inside the shower stall, and a Hoyer lifter wrapped with surgical tape stored in the room. b) Shower Room # 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 04/27/23 to 05/04/23, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional environment for residents, staff, and the public. This was evident during observations of the facility Elevators #1 and #2 and for 1 (Unit 3) of 5 Units. 1) Specifically, Elevators #1 and #2 were observed with loose metal handrails that were easily moved when touched and 2) the Unit 3 Nursing Station was observed with multiple loose cable wires, a broken desk, heavily faded and discolored chairs, and a loose staff sink. The findings are: 1) On 05/02 23 at 9:14 AM and 05/04/23 at 11:35 AM, Elevator #1 and #2 were observed with handrails that were not securely affixed to the elevator side wall. The handrails were loose and could be easily moved up and down when touched. The Director of Maintenance was interviewed on 05/04/23 at 10:44 AM and stated that Elevators #1 and #2 are inspected daily to ensure it is operating safely and appropriately. The handrails in the elevators are checked by maintenance once a week. 2) On 04/27/23 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 04/27/23 - 05/04/23, the facility did not ensure separately locked, permanently affixed compartments were provided for storage of controlled drugs and other drugs subject to abuse. This was evident for 1 (Unit 5) of 5 Medication Rooms reviewed for Medication Storage. Specifically, the Unit 5 Medication Room was observed with a broken narcotics box lock preventing the door from being locked with a key. The findings are: The facility policy titled Controlled Substance/Narcotic Management Protocol dated 01/2023 documented all controlled substance blister packs/medications will be stored in a double locked cabinet affixed to the wall in the medication rooms. On 04/28/23 at 11:15 AM, the narcotics box in the Unit 5 Medication Room was observed with an outer door that was closed and locked. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was present during the observation and used 1 key to open the outer lock of the narcotics box. The 2nd inner door of the narcotics box was observed with a broken lock and was opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0914 — isolated
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 4/27/23 to 5/4/23, the facility did not ensure full visual privacy for each resident. This was evident for 1 (Unit 5) of 5 Units. Specifically, there were multiple resident rooms without privacy curtains. The findings are: On 4/27/2023 at 11:00 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed changing Resident #47's incontinent brief on the far side of the room at the B bed. The A bed was empty. There were no privacy curtains in the room and the door to the room was left ajar. On 4/27/2023, 4/28/2023 and 5/1/2023 Unit 5 was observed with the following: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 2-bedded room, with no privacy curtain or shade for 506A and 506B 2. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bedded room, with no privacy curtain or shade for bed 506C 3. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 2-bedded room with no privacy curtain for bed 506A The Unit 5 Maintenance Logbook dated 4/1/23 to 5/4/23 documented no staff reports of missing privacy curtains. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-09-27 · tag F0813 — widespread
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that they had a policy regarding the use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. Specifically, the facility did not provide accommodations for heating and storage of food brought to residents from outside the facility. This was evident for all residents in the facility. The finding is: The facility admission Packet contains a welcome document containing information about the services provided by the facility. The Welcome to Bridge View Nursing Home packet documented the following under the topic of Food: The facility is a Kosher facility. The facility recognizes that the involvement of a resident family member can be very beneficial to the resident's nutritional status. Therefore where appropriate and possible, staff will encourage family members to participate in the resident's dining experience. Family members are allowed within the confines of the facility policy to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that personnel transported linens so as to prevent the spread of infection. Specifically, housekeeping staff was observed transporting linens in uncovered carts throughout the basement and in elevators used by the public. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the entire facility. The Policy and Procedures on Laundry and linens dated on January 2018 documents, Policy: An adequate supply of clean linen shall be maintained for the facility through safe and sanitary laundry procedures. The laundry service processes soiled linen so that the risk of disease to residents and to employees who handle these linens is minimal. Procedures: The Director of laundry services will work closely with the infection control committee to establish and maintain consistently high standards. All laundry employees will be expected to attend inservice programs pertaining to infection control. All clean linen will be covered during transportation to mitigate the risk of contamination. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-09-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure care plans were reviewed and revised after each assessment. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that a resident's care plan was updated on the resident's readmission to include a new diagnosis of pneumonia. This was evident for 1 resident out of a total investigation sample of 36 residents. (Resident #113) The finding is: Resident #113 is a resident, readmitted [DATE], with a diagnosis of Pneumonia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 7/03/18 documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further documented that resident is able to express wants and needs and has the ability to understand others. The readmission record dated 9/10/2018 documented the resident was readmitted from the hospital with a new diagnosis of pneumonia and a new order for continuous oxygen use of 4 L/min (Liters per minute) via nasal canula. The Physician's Order Form dated 9/10/2018 documented that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain, grooming, and personal hygiene. Specifically, Resident #25 was not provided assistance with cleaning and maintenance of prosthetic eye as recommended by consultant Optometrist. This was evident for one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of a sample of 35 residents. The facility's Policy, Procedures and Information entitled: Medical Consultation was reviewed. It documented: Purpose: To ensure continuity of medical needs. Procedure: 9. The Primary Physician will review and document findings and recommendations by the Consulting Physician including follow-up visit. 10. The Primary Physician will give a telephone order or write an order of the findings and recommendations by the consulting physician. The finding is: Resident #25 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE GRAND HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY