The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing At Rome
801 North James Street, Rome, NY 13440 · For profit - Individual · 160 certified beds · (315) 337-0550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $76,542 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-05)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.8% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.8% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.7% | 19.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.5% | 13.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.2% | 13.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.7% | 78.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.2% | 20.6% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.9% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.70 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.02 | 1.36 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 24.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.3%CMS range 24.2–43.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.5–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 24.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 21.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 79.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 17.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.4–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 151.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Complaint ID# 2613592), the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfers or discharges from the facility for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2). Specifically, Resident #2 was discharged on 05/19/2025 to the Department of Social Services via family transportation without consulting the Department of Social Services to ensure the plan met the resident's health and safety needs, and preferences. The resident had no identification, and no supportive services in place, and was discharged without proper education and supplies to manage their diabetes and diabetic wounds. This resulted in the likelihood of serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment or death that was Immediate Jeopardy to Resident #2. Findings include:The facility policy Discharge Planning, last reviewed 01/2025, documented the discharge planning program maintained a coordinated program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00304388), the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of aspiration (inhalation of foods/fluids into the lungs) risk, was on an altered consistency diet (chopped solids) and required supervision and assistance with eating. On 4/26/2023, the resident was provided a sandwich and was not supervised while eating. Subsequently, approximately 30 minutes later, the resident was found without signs of life (no pulse or respirations), with food in their mouth, and was pronounced deceased . The resident had an autopsy that concluded their airway was completely obstructed by a food bolus (soft mass of chewed food). The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision placed 45 residents in the facility who were on altered consistency diets at risk. This resulted in actual harm and Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to resident health and safety for Resident #1. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews (iQIES Intake 2740528), the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for three (3) of four (4) residents (Residents #11, #21, and #37) reviewed. Specifically, it was reported Certified Nurse Aide #31 was heard calling Resident #21 a liar and there was no documented evidence the facility investigated the allegation to rule out abuse; Resident #11 reported to several staff members that Licensed Practical Nurse #36 intentionally did not provide them with their pain medication and the allegation was not reported to administration to ensure an investigation was completed to rule out neglect or mistreatment; and Resident #37 used a broken plate to threaten another resident and there was no documented evidence the incident was investigated to determine root cause and prevent reoccurrence. Findings include: The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriate-Reporting and Investigating, revised 01/2026, documented all reports of resident abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #3 and #16) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #3 and #16 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have consistent on-going assessments or oversight before and after dialysis treatments and there was no documented evidence the resident's Tesio catheter (access site for dialysis treatment) was routinely assessed. Findings include:The facility policy Dialysis, revised 01/2026, documented the facility had a written agreement with all dialysis center providers and the facility maintained a communication log with the respective centers for all residents that went to dialysis. The communication log was used to communicate the resident's needs and responses to dialysis treatment. 1)Resident #16 had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease with dialysis and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews (iQIES intake 2620687), the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for three (3) of four (4) medication carts (Wing Three front and back and Wing Four back medication carts) reviewed. Specifically, Wing Three front medication cart was unlocked and unattended with two (2) medicine cups containing pre-poured medications; Wing Three back medication cart had an undated, unlabeled, open vile of lidocaine (anesthetic), an opened and undated inhaler, one (1) expired insulin pen and one (1) expired insulin vial, and one (1) insulin pen and one (1) insulin vial that were opened and undated; and Wing Four had two (2) opened undated eyes drops, and five (5) opened undated inhalers. Findings included:The facility policy Storage of Medications, last reviewed 01/2026, documented nursing staff were responsible for maintaining medication storage. The facility did not use outdated drugs or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews (iQIES Intake 2620687), the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one (1) of one (1) main kitchen and 1 (one) of 4 (four) unit pantries (Unit 2 pantry). Specifically, a black substance was observed on the main kitchen cold production reach in cooler door gasket; in the main kitchen walk-in milk cooler along the rim of the ceiling; and on the Unit 2 snack refrigerator door gasket; the cold production reach in cooler did not maintain a safe temperature, the food inside tested at unsafe temperatures; and Food Service Worker #19 attempted to serve Resident #108 a meal tray removed from a food cart with dirty trays. Findings include:The facility policy General Sanitation of Kitchen, revised 01/2026, documented cleaning and sanitation tasks for the kitchen would be recorded, and staff would be trained on the cleaning schedule and how to perform the cleaning tasks.The facility policy Foodborne Safety, revised 01/2026, documented cold food would be stored below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intakes 2626225, 2712590, and 2740528), the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for two (2) of seven (7) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 was not toileted as planned; and Resident #1 was not provided with oral care as planned.Findings include: The facility policy Resident Care with Activities of Daily Living, last reviewed 01/2026, documented the facility would accurately assist with the residents need for basic activities of daily living functions; would provide adequate toileting maintaining maximum level of toileting and continence; would offer toileting assistance every two (2) to four (4) hours to those on a toileting program; would assist residents to cleanse and freshen the resident's mouth; and the supervisor would be notified of any refusals. 1)Resident #1 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with nutritional and hydration care services consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 was on a renal diet (specialized diet for kidney failure that limits specific minerals) and a fluid restriction. Resident #3's actual fluid intake was not monitored and the resident received extra fluids beyond the allotted restrictions at meals; and was provided with extra food which was limited on their prescribed renal diet. Findings include:The facility diet manual, approved on 9/25/2025, documented the renal diet assured sodium, potassium, and phosphorus were limited to prevent further burden on the kidneys. The diet description documented milk was limited to 4 (four) ounces daily and chocolate was excluded.Resident #3 had diagnoses including end stage kidney disease. The 01/11/2026 Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) documented the resident had intact cognition, was on a therapeutic diet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #47) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #47 had an individualized care plan with interventions in place that included person-centered approaches or steps to assist in guiding staff in managing the resident's care. Findings include: The facility policy Care Plans/Comprehensive Person Centered, last reviewed 01/2026, documented the comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed for each resident to include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. The comprehensive care plan should reflect person- centered care with resident specific interventions and should be reviewed and revised as appropriate upon readmission to the facility, quarterly, annually and with any significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intake 2620687) the facility failed to ensure a system of records and accounts of all controlled drugs was maintained for one (1) of five (5) residents (Residents #28, #40, #57, #99, and #106) reviewed. Specifically, on Unit 1 a controlled substance reconciliation (a system of recordkeeping that ensures an accurate inventory of controlled medications) was not performed between the oncoming and outgoing nurse, narcotic keys were not transferred between nurses in a secured manner, a narcotic medication was signed out as administered, but was not, and a poured controlled substance was insecurely stored in the medication cart; Resident #28's, Resident #40's, Resident #57's, and Resident #99's controlled substance records did not accurately reflect the level of medications on hand; and Resident #106 did not receive an as needed dose of lorazepam that was signed out on the reconciliation sheet. Findings include:The facility policy Controlled Substance/Narcotic Management Protocol, last reviewed 01/2026, documented with each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #14) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #14 received Ativan (a medication for anxiety) twice a day and the medication was not administered within the prescribed time frame causing discomfort to the resident. Findings include: The facility policy Administering Medications, last revised 1/2026, documented medications were administered in a safe and timely manner as prescribed. Medications were administered within (1) one hour of the prescribed time unless otherwise specified. If a medication was not administered at the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication should document that in the electronic medication administration record and notify the attending/covering physician. The undated facility medication pass schedule documented the following times: 7:00AM-10:00 AM; 11:00 AM; 1:00 PM; 2:00 PM; 4:00 PM; 7:00 PM-10:00 PM; 10:00 PM; 12:00 AM; and 6:00 AM. Resident #14 had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly for one (1) of one (1) dumpster area located near the loading dock. Specifically, there were several used gloves, empty food containers, and vegetable scraps on the ground around the dumpster.Findings include:The facility policy Dumpster and Waste Disposal, dated 01/2026, documented dumpsters would be maintained in a clean, secure, and sanitary condition. Dumpsters would be cleaned and sanitized on a routine basis and waste would not be placed outside dumpsters.During an observation and interview on 04/14/2026 at 8:20 AM, there were several used gloves, empty food containers, and vegetable scraps on the ground around the dumpsters near the loading dock. The ground near the dumpsters was mostly loose gravel in poor repair. Food Service Director #16 stated maintenance was responsible for keeping the area clean.During an interview on 04/17/2026 at 8:54 AM, Maintenance Director #18 stated the maintenance staff checked the dumpster area and was responsible for cleaning it to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #61 and #146) reviewed. Specifically, staff did not wear the required personal protection equipment while caring for Residents #61 and #146 who were on contact precautions.Findings include: The 04/03/2024 Centers for Disease Control recommendations documented transmission-based precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are used in addition to standard precautions for patients who may be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission. Use contact precautions for patients with known or suspected infections that represent an increased risk for contact transmission. Use personal protective equipment appropriately. Wear a gown and gloves for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated (NY00339441) survey the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing and promote wound healing for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #293) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #293 developed a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss) facility-acquired pressure ulcer when incontinence care was not provided routinely or as planned and treatments to the area were not consistently administered. Subsequently, the pressure injury progressed to an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the wound is covered with dead tissue). Findings include: The facility policy, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, revised 1/2024, documented residents' skin was to be inspected daily when staff were performing or assisting with personal care or activities of daily living. Any signs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 4 of 4 Units (Units 100, 200, 300, and 400) reviewed. Specifically, floors, walls, ceilings, and resident chairs were damaged or unclean on Units 100, 200, 300, and 400; drain flies were observed in the Unit 200 shower room; and there was no negative air pressure in Units 200, 300, and 400 soiled utility rooms (negative pressure rooms have a lower air pressure, created by ventilation, to reduce the flow of potentially contaminated air or odors from leaking into the surrounding areas). Findings include: The facility policy, Housekeeping Responsibilities, reviewed 1/2022, documented the facility would maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for the residents. Routine cleaning included daily cleaning of all horizontal surfaces with an acceptable grade disinfectant/germicide. A schedule of cleaning tasks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340701, NY00330066, NY00333069, and NY00328237) surveys conducted 6/24/2024 - 6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 11 residents (Residents #56, #80, #90, and #127) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #127 had untrimmed fingernails and was not wearing their glasses; and Residents #56, #80, and #90 had unclean and untrimmed fingernails. Findings include: The facility policy, Resident Care with Activities of Daily Living, reviewed 1/2022, documented the facility was to accurately assist with residents' needs to support basic activities of daily living function. The supervisor was to be notified if the resident refused care and to report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. The facility policy, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, reviewed 1/2024, documented nail care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340613, NY00328237, and NY0330066) surveys conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals (6/26/2024 breakfast meal and 6/26/2024 lunch meal) reviewed. Specifically, the breakfast and lunch meals were not served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility policy, Policy and Procedure Food Temperatures, reviewed 01/2023, documented the temperatures of all food items would be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal. All hot food would be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held, and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Hot food items would not fall below 135 degrees Fahrenheit after cooking, unless it was an item which would be rapidly cooled to below 41 degrees Fahrenheit and reheated to at least 165 degrees Fahrenheit (for a minimum of 15 seconds) prior to serving.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0920 — patternProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00330066 and NY00331744) surveys conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility did not provide one or more rooms designated for resident dining and activities that were adequately furnished and had sufficient space to accommodate all activities for 2 of 4 dining rooms (Units 100 and 400). Specifically, Units 100's and 400's dining rooms had tables that did not accommodate residents' social and physical needs with inadequate space for dining or activities, and residents were lined up in the hallways during meals. Findings include: The facility policy, Preparing the Resident for a Meal, reviewed 1/2024, documented residents should be encouraged, not forced, to eat in the dining room to provide each resident the opportunity to socialize and make friends. Be sure the room was comfortable (i.e., not too warm, or cold) and had a relaxing environment (free of odors, loud noises, and bright lights). The following observations were made on Unit 100. The unit census was 36 residents. - During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00330066) surveys conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #28 and #44) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #28 and #44 were referred to with undignified labels (feeders); and Resident #44 was assisted with eating while staff stood over them. Findings include: The facility policy, Quality of Life-Dignity, reviewed 1/2024, documented residents would be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Ttreated with dignity meant the resident would be assisted in maintaining and enhancing their self-esteem and self-worth and staff should speak respectfully to residents at all times, including addressing the resident by their name of choice and not labeling or referring to the resident by their room number, diagnosis, or care needs. 1) Resident #28 had diagnoses including dementia, cerebral infarction (stroke), and bipolar depression. The 4/26/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, or a related conditions were referred for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care and a Level II PASARR identifies the specialized services required by the resident) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #101) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documentation Resident #101 was referred for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review when the resident was newly diagnosed with a serious mental health disorder. Findings include: The New York State Department of Health Instruction Manual for DOH-695 (2/2009) documented if a Residential Health Care Facility resident is newly diagnosed with a mental illness, a new SCREEN and Level II referral must be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00330066) surveys conducted 6242024-6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #111) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #111 had a physician order for a chopped consistency diet and was served a whole sandwich. Findings include: The facility policy, Food Consistencies and Definitions, reviewed 1/2024, documented diets with a chopped consistency were nearly regular textures with exception of very hard, sticky, or crunchy foods. Foods should be tender and easy to break into pieces with a fork. Lunch/Dinner foods such as meatballs, thinly sliced deli meat, and grilled cheese sandwiches should be chopped. The policy did not include definitions for a mechanical soft diet. The facility policy, Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line, revised 1/2024 documented all meals would be checked for accuracy by the Food and Nutrition staff, and by the service staff prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #59) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #59 did not receive ordered fluids on their meal tray and was not offered a substitution when they requested a sandwich. Findings include: The facility's Always Available Menu documented lunch and dinner entree alternates included the following sandwiches; ham, egg salad, tuna salad, turkey, bologna, sliced cheese, peanut butter and jelly, and chicken salad. Resident #59 was had diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and chronic kidney disease. The 5/19/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact, had a poor appetite most days, required supervision or touching assistance for eating, did not have a swallowing disorder, had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth, and did not require a mechanically altered diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2024-6/28/2024, the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility received a letter from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services dated 2/09/2024, prohibiting the provision of a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program, conducting onsite nurse aide competency exams, or utilizing onsite clinical training by an off-site nurse aide training program, effective through 10/2025, and the facility was observed conducting an off-site nurse aide training program. Findings include: The facility contract with a local community college effective for the period of March 1, 2023, through December 31, 2024, documented the parties proposed to collaborate to provide for the certified nurse aide students at the college the In-Agency learning experiences necessary for them to become responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00304388), the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated; did not ensure residents were protected while the investigation was in process; did not implement plans to prevent reoccurrence; and did not ensure incidents were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) when required for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and 2). Specifically, - Resident #1, whose cognition was severely impaired, had a sexual encounter with a cognitively intact resident (Resident #2) and a plan was not implemented to protect Resident #1 from further potential abuse. Additionally, recommendations from the psychiatric nurse practitioner (NP) for 15-minute checks were not implemented. - Residents #1 and 2 had 2 more documented episodes of inappropriate touching that were not reported to the NYS DOH as required. - Resident #1 was found deceased with food in their mouth and the incident was not thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse/neglect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00304388), the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, facility Administration, including the Director of Nursing (DON) did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents (choking), did not complete a thorough investigation into resident choking, and did not report neglect as required to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH). Findings include: Refer to F689 - Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Assistance Devices On 10/18/2023 at 3:38 PM, Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified during an abbreviated complaint survey. Concerns rising to the level of immediate risk to resident health and safety included the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to Resident #1 while eating. Approximately 30 minutes after being provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00271335, NY00276204, NY00290644, NY00293364, and NY00297551) conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 4 resident units (Units 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed. Specifically, there were sticky/unclean floors, scrapped/damaged walls, exposed electrical wires, water dripping from a ceiling vent, resident clothing left on the ground in a clean utility closet, a loose/unsecured toilet bowl, and a loose/unsecured resident room doorknob. Additionally, Resident #48's room was not personalized and/or homelike. Findings include: 1)Unclean Floors/Scraped Walls The Maintenance Schedule for Floors, revised 1/28/21, documented that two resident room floors would be stripped and waxed each day. The following observations of floors and walls were made: - on 8/8/22 at 10:18 AM, and 8/9/22 at 9:31 AM, the floor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was sticky and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality for 23 of 39 residents (Residents #2, 4, 13, 19, 32, 34, 36, 37, 39, 43, 44, 57, 66, 81, 82, 87, 89, 100, 102, 104, 111, 146, and 155) reviewed. Specifically, during a medication storage review of the Unit 1 medication cart, 23 residents had pre-poured medications in cups, stored in the top drawer of the Unit 1 medication cart. Findings include: The facility policy Administering Medications reviewed 1/2022 documented medications must be administered within 1 hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's medication administration record (MAR) after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. Medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident. The facility policy Storage of Medications reviewed 1/2022 documented drugs shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 7 medication carts (Units 1and 4) and 3 of 4 medication storage rooms (Units 1, 3, and 4) observed. Specifically, Units 1 and 4 had expired stock medications in the medication rooms and medication carts and the Unit 3 medication storage room refrigerator had an expired biological multi-dose vial. Findings include: The facility policy Storage of Medications reviewed 1/2022 documented the facility should not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs should be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications should have access to the medication room. During an observation on 8/9/22 at 4:11 PM, the Unit 1 medication storage was observed with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #32. The following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00271335) surveys conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's main kitchen and emergency food supply room. Specifically in the main kitchen: - the hand-washing sink, near the dishwasher area, had a faucet that was leaking water. - The metal vent system, over the dishwasher, was rusty and soiled. - The metal support pieces for the ceiling tiles in the dishwasher area were unclean/rusty. - The wall behind the dishwasher was soiled with food and unclean. - The floor behind the 3 bay sink area was unclean with debris on it. - A section of floor between the 3 bay sink and a food heating oven had standing water and was unclean. - The walk-in milk cooler contained undated sliced cheese. - The dishwasher clean storage rack had two 8 quart measuring cups with orange colored debris on them. - The storage room contained two dented 62 ounce (oz.) mushroom cans and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not provide Resident #55, whose primary language was not English, with a plan for communication of needs and preferences. The findings are: The facility policy Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services reviewed 1/2022 documented the facility's language access program would ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) would have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility. Resident #55 had diagnoses including dizziness and anxiety. The 5/3/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident needed or wanted an interpretor to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22 the facility failed to determine the clinical appropriateness of self-administration of medications for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #124) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #124 had a physician order documenting the resident was not capable of self-administering medications and multiple creams and Melatonin (a hormone that promotes sleep) were observed in the resident's locked bedside table. Findings include: The facility policy Administering Medications reviewed 1/2022, documented residents may self-administer medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, determined they had the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Resident #124 had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, and history of intentional self-harm poisoning by medications. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22 to 8/15/22, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while an investigation was in process for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #99) reviewed. Specifically, certified nurse aide (CNA) #10 was not removed from having contact with residents immediately following an alleged incident of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment involving Resident #99. Findings include: The facility policy Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol revised 1/2022 documented abuse was the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also included the deprivation by an individual including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Neglect was defined as the failure of the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00276204, NY00294053, NY00297551, NY00264591, NY00293364, NY00300052, and NY00290644) surveys conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #17, 37 and 48) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #17's hair was unclean, Resident #37 was not dressed daily, and Resident #48's nails were unclean, and their clothing was not changed daily. Findings include: The facility policy Brushing and Combing Hair dated 1/2022 documented the resident's hair should be brushed and combed every morning before breakfast and whenever necessary throughout the day. Staff were to comb and style the resident's hair according to their preferences. The facility policy Dressing and Undressing the Resident dated 1/2022 documented staff were to encourage the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00300052 and NY00264591) surveys conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #73) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #73 did not have Prevalon boots (a boot that floats the heels to reduce pressure) applied to their bilateral heels while in bed or in their wheelchair as planned. Findings include: The facility policy Care plans- Baseline revised 1/2022 documented a baseline care plan was to be developed for the resident within 48 hours to assure the resident's immediate care needs were met and maintained, including initial goals and physician's orders. The facility policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown Clinical Protocol reviewed 4/2022 documented the physician would help the staff review and modify the care plan as appropriate, especially when wounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00268090) conducted on 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as possible and residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #108) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #108 had smoking materials in their room which were not secured per facility policy and the resident's plan of care and other care planned interventions to promote smoking safety were to implemented as planned. Findings include: The facility policy Smoke Free Policy, revised 1/2022, documented it was the policy of the facility to maintain a smoke free facility. The facility was to possess all smoking and lighting materials at all times. The resident would be evaluated on admission, quarterly, and upon a significant change to determine if the resident was a smoker or non-smoker. If a smoker, the evaluation would include current level and frequency of tobacco consumption; ability to smoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental care for 1 of 3 (Resident #96) residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not obtain the services of a dentist for Resident #96 when their lower dentures were missing and not recovered. Findings include: The facility policy Dental Services reviewed 1/2022 documented routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the residents' oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Social services representatives would assist residents with appointments and transportation arrangements. Direct care staff would assist residents with denture care, including removing, cleaning, and storing dentures. Dentures would be protected from loss or damage to the extent practicable, while being stored. If dentures were damaged or lost, residents would be referred for dental services within 3 days. If the referral was not made within 3 days, documentation would be provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to ensure the menus reflect, based on a facility's reasonable efforts, the religious, cultural, and ethnic needs of the resident population for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #48). Specifically, Resident #48 had limited intake due to cultural and ethnic food preferences and there was no documented evidence the facility attempted to obtain foods that would meet the resident's preferences. Findings include: The facility Resident Food Preferences Policy and Procedure dated 1/2022 documented that upon the resident's admission the dietitian or nursing staff would identify a resident's food preferences. Nursing staff would document the resident's food and eating preferences in the care plan. If the resident refused or was not happy with their diet, the staff would create a care plan that the resident was satisfied with. The Food Service Department would offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal. Resident #48 had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00294053) surveys conducted 8/8/22-8/15/22, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 certified nurse aides (CNAs #20 and 45) and activity aide #51 observed for appropriate mask wearing. Specifically, CNAs #20 and 45 and activity aide #51 were observed not wearing face masks appropriately in resident care areas. Findings include: The facility policy Personal Protective Equipment - Using Face Masks reviewed 1/2022 documented an objective of using face masks was to prevent transmission of some infections that were spread by direct contact with mucous membranes. Be sure that face masks covered the nose and mouth while performing treatment or services for the patient. The facility policy Updated Guidance on COVID-19 revised 1/10/22 documented all staff and contractors must wear a face mask in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$76,542 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $45,257 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
- $31,285 — penalty dated 2023-10-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE GRAND HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRAUSS, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 98% | since 04/01/2010 |
| ROGERS, ERIC | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| STRAUSS, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $818K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335589. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.