The Grand Rehabilitation And Nursing At Utica
1657 Sunset Ave, Utica, NY 13502 · For profit - Corporation · 220 certified beds · (315) 797-7392 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $132,759 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-05)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.7% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.8% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 19.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.4% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.9% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.7% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.2% | 19.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.9% | 13.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.7% | 78.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.9% | 20.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.0% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.87 | 1.36 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 190 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.6%CMS range 36.4–51.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.5–12.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.9–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 220 beds and averages 213.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025 - 6/05/2025, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, following a wastewater back up from the grease trap and drains flooding the main kitchen on 5/27/2025, the facility failed to adequately address wastewater cleanup including monitoring, evaluating, and sanitizing as necessary, cooking equipment and appliances in the main kitchen. Additionally, there was no detectable level of sanitizer in the 3-bay sink and dishwasher to adequately sanitize dishware. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety for all 215 residents of the facility. Findings include: The facility policy Food Receiving and Storage, last reviewed 1/2025, documented the facility would maintain clean food storage areas at all times. The undated facility policy Sanitization, documented the food service area should be maintained in a clean and sanitary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00343878), the facility failed to provide residents with treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #5, and #6). Specifically, - Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall, the medical provider was not notified timely of the fall or outcome of the assessment, and there was no evidence neurological checks were implemented. Subsequently, the resident experienced a significant change in condition, the medical provider ordered the resident to be sent to the hospital, and Emergency Medical Services was not notified immediately for transportation. The resident was transferred to the hospital where they expired from asphyxiation (loss of oxygen) due to choking on their dentures. - Resident #5 had unwitnessed falls and neurological assessments were not initiated or completed. - Resident #6 sustained a fall with a head injury and neurological assessments were not continued after the initial assessment. The facility's failure to complete timely assessments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted on 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety affecting the entire facility. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain a walk-in cooler in operating condition and was found to have an ambient air temperature above 45 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Milk from that walk-in cooler was found to be at 59.5 degrees F and was to be served to residents (required temperature: 45 F or less per New York State, NYS, code and 41 F or less per Food and Drug Administration, FDA, food code). Additional food product in a stand-up cooler that came from the improperly functioning walk-in cooler contained cottage cheese which was measured at 52 degrees F. The milk from the line was pulled at 12:45 PM. Unit 3 was called at 12:52 PM and the dairy products were not removed from the resident trays. Fifty-seven residents (Residents #6, 22, 24, 34, 38, 41, 49, 50, 54, 69, 71, 75, 76, 79, 86, 89, 96, 98, 100, 101,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025 -6/5/2025 the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one (1) of one (1) main kitchen, and two (2) of seven (7) resident unit refrigerators (Units 3 and 6). Specifically, the main kitchen had multiple unclean surfaces, broken tiles and wall strips, food items were not labeled or dated, and the walk-in freezer had ice buildup; Units 3 and 6 refrigerators were outside acceptable temperatures for food safety; and the Unit 6 ice machine had white build up. Findings include: The undated facility policy Sanitization, documented the food service area would be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas shall be kept clean and free from litter and rubbish. All utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment were to be kept clean, maintained in good repair, and were to be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks, and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Ice machines would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025-6/6/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of (2) two meals reviewed (Lunch meals on 6/3/2025 and 6/4/2025). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal on 6/3/2025 and 6/4/2025. Additionally, six residents (Resident #64, #103, #138, #152, #161, and #173) stated the food did not taste good and was cold. Findings include: Resident interviews included the following: - on 5/27/2025 at 10:59 AM Resident #103 stated the food was not good. - on 5/27/2025 at 11:44 AM, Resident #161 stated the food was not good and was warm. - on 5/27/2025 at 12:11 PM, Resident #173 stated the food was normally cold. - on 5/27/2025 at 12:17 PM, Resident #138 stated the food was not good and sometimes it was half cooked and sometimes it was raw. - on 5/27/2025 at 12:32 PM, Resident #152 stated they did not like the food except for the pudding. - on 5/28/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and extended surveys conducted 5/27/2025- 6/5/2025 the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, administration failed to ensure that residents received appropriate quality of care by allowing the following deficient practices to exist, placing residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death, F 812 Food and Nutrition Services. The facility failed to adequately address wastewater cleanup including monitoring, evaluating, and sanitizing cooking equipment and appliances in the main kitchen. Additionally, there was no detectable level of sanitizer in the 3-bay sink and dishwasher to adequately sanitize dishware. Findings include: The facility Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Plan reviewed 1/2025, documented the program's purpose was to evaluate the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/28/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's ability to safely self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #20 and #144) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #20 had medications left in their room and Resident #144 had an inhaler (used for breathing difficulty) at their bedside, without physician orders to self-administer medications or documented evidence they were assessed to determine their ability to safely self-administer medications. Findings include: The facility policy Medications Brought to the Facility by the Resident/Family, revised 1/2025, documented the facility would not permit residents and families to bring medications into the facility. If the medication was not otherwise available and was determined to be essential, and brought in from the outside, the Director of Nursing with the support of the attending physician and consultant pharmacist shall check to ensure the medication was ordered by the attending physician,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure resident advance directives (instructions relating to the provision of health care when an individual is incapacitated) were accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #55 did not have physician orders for advance directives and advance directives documented throughout the medical record did not reflect the resident's wishes to receive cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in the event of an emergency. Findings include: The facility policy Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, revised 1/2025, documented adequate information would be given to residents concerning resident rights, medical situations for decision making, and explanation of forms and procedures for making advance medical directives. Do not resuscitate (allow natural death) and do not intubate (placing a breathing tube) orders were reviewed every 30 days for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00358322) surveys conducted 5/27/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not allow one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #185) to return to the facility to their previous room or immediately upon the first availability of a bed. Specifically, Resident #185 was not accepted back to the facility in a timely manner once cleared by the hospital for discharge Findings included: The facility policy Bed Reservation (Bed Hold), dated 5/29/2019, documented if a resident left the facility due to hospitalization, the facility was not obligated to hold the bed until the resident's return unless prior arrangements had been made for a bed hold. In the absence of a bed hold, the resident may be placed in any appropriate semi-private bed at the facility at the time of return from the hospital, provided a bed was available. The facility policy Discharging of the Resident, revised 1/2025, documented discharge planning involved the interdisciplinary team working with the resident. The facility must permit the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00370441) surveys conducted 5/27/2025 -6/5/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to include services provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for two (2) of five (5) residents (Residents #56 and #11) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #56 did not have a care plan for managing their peripherally inserted central catheter (intravenous line); and Resident #11's care plan did not reflect their current dialysis schedule or correct dialysis access site location. Findings include: The facility policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, revised 1/2025, documented a comprehensive care plan was developed for each resident and included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Assessments of the resident were ongoing, and care plans were revised when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00352395) conducted 5/27/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident and/or resident representative participated in the development of the comprehensive care plan for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #214) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #214 participated in the development of their Comprehensive Care Plan or was invited to attend their initial comprehensive care plan meeting. The facility policy Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, revised 1/2025, documented the resident care plan was developed by the Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and the resident was encouraged to participate in development and revisions. The facility policy Discharging of the Resident, revised 1/2025, documented discharge planning began at admission; was based on the resident's assessment; and goals for care would involve direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00370441) surveys conducted 5/27/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #123) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #123 was not assisted with washing their hair or genital care as planned. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Care with Activities of Daily Living, last reviewed 1/2025, documented the facility was to accurately assist with residents' needs to support basic activities of daily living function. The supervisor was to be notified if the resident refused care and to report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Resident #123 had diagnoses including urinary tract infection and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (impairment of nerves and muscles that control the bladder). The 4/26/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025 - 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents reviewed (Resident #96). Specifically, Resident #96 had pressure ulcers that were not monitored or have treatment/management interventions in place. The facility policy Repositioning, revised 1/2025, documented the purpose was to provide guidelines for the evaluation of resident repositioning needs, to aid in the development of an individualized care plan for repositioning, to promote comfort for all bed- or chair-bound residents and to prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation and provide pressure relief for residents; repositioning was critical for a resident who was immobile or dependent upon staff for repositioning; and repositioning was a common, effective intervention for preventing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #91) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #91 who resided on the Dementia Care Unit had cough drops at their bedside not ordered by the medical provider. Findings include: The facility policy Medications Brought to the Facility by the Resident/Family, revised 1/2025, documented the facility would not permit residents and families to bring medications into the facility. Residents and families had to report to the nursing staff any medications they wanted to bring or have brought into the facility. If the medication was not otherwise available and was determined to be essential to the resident's life, health, safety, or well-being, the Director of Nursing, nursing staff, the attending physician, and the consultant pharmacist checked to ensure state law and regulations allow the use, the medications had been ordered by the resident's attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025 - 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were evaluated for hydration care consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents (Resident #144) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #144's hydration needs were not reassessed or reviewed for adequacy by clinical nutrition staff after they were diagnosed with urinary tract infections. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, last reviewed 1/2025, documented the dietitian would assess all residents for hydration adequacy at least quarterly, and more often as necessary per resident need; the dietitian, nursing staff, and the physician would assess factors that may contribute to inadequate fluid intake; nursing would monitor and document fluid intake and the dietitian would be kept informed of status; and the interdisciplinary team would update the care plan and document resident response to interventions until team agrees that fluid intake and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00372942) surveys conducted 5/27/2025-6/6/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #57) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #57 did not receive bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP/a device to assist with breathing) as ordered. Findings include: The facility policy Continuous Positive Airway Pressure /Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure, last reviewed 1/2025, documented, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure /Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure, was provided for support of spontaneous breathing for residents with continuous positive airway pressure with or without supplemental oxygen. Resident #57 had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea (stops breathing while sleeping), obstructive pulmonary disease (restricted airway). The 4/16/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognition, was dependent for most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025-6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for one (1) of five (5) medication carts (4th floor cart) and one (1) of four (4) medication storage rooms (4th floor medication room). Specifically, the 4th floor medication cart and medication room had expired stock medications and biologicals. Findings include: The facility policy Storage of Medications, last reviewed 1/2025, documented the facility would not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs would be returned to the pharmacy or destroyed. During a 4th floor medication room storage observation on 5/29/2025 at 1:43 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse #49, the following were observed: - 1 unopened 12-ounce bottle of antacid with a manufacturer's expiration date of 2/2025. - 1 unopened 12-ounce bottle of antacid with a manufacturer's expiration date of 3/2025. - the medication refrigerator had 1 opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 5/27/2025 - 6/5/2025, the facility did not ensure they established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #33, #118, and #211) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #118's urinary drainage bag was observed uncovered and lying directly on the floor; and Residents #33 and #211 were administered eye drops by Licensed Practical Nurse #49 who did not perform hand hygiene or don gloves. Additionally, the facility did not conduct legionella (a bacteria that causes Legionnaire's disease, a type of pneumonia) testing as required. Findings include: The facility policy Administering Medications, last reviewed 1/2025, documented staff should follow established facility infection control procedures (handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespreadProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00332276) conducted [DATE]-[DATE], the facility failed to ensure resident preferences and physician orders related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (perform chest compressions in the event of a cardiac arrest), and other advance directive issues were communicated throughout the facility so that staff knew immediately what action to take or not to take when an emergency arose. Specifically, staff were unable to consistently identify resident code status indicators in the event of cardiac arrest. On [DATE], Resident #400 was found without a pulse in a non-residential area of the facility. Staff did not know the resident's code status and initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (chest compressions). The resident had a physician order documenting do not attempt resuscitation (allow natural death). In addition, resident code status identification bracelets were documented as being in place and were observed not in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00299391, NY00325885, and NY00331016) surveys conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 18 isolated areas (resident rooms 263, 266, 270, and 273; second floor south hallway; second floor south dining room; second floor activities room kitchenette; second floor west shower room; second floor west lounge bathroom; second floor west soiled utility room; second floor south telephone room; second floor south closet near social workers office; resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; third floor shower room; fifth floor hallway near resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; sixth floor hallways near elevator; and, resident room [ROOM NUMBER]). Specifically: - On multiple floors the halls, walls, and ceilings were in disrepair. - The hot water in second floor south dining room did not work. - The second floor activities room kitchenette had a broken paper towel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00328424) surveys conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 5 medication carts (4th floor, 6th floor and 7th floor) and 7 of 7 medication refrigerators (2 South, 2 West, 3rd floor, 4th floor, 5th floor, 6th floor and 7th floor) reviewed. Specifically, the 4th floor medication cart had eye drops for Resident #61 and Resident #136 without labeled open dates or discard dates; the 6th floor medication cart had eye drops for Resident #9 without labeled open or discard dates, and opened house stock cough syrup without labeled open date or discard date; and the 7th floor medication cart had eye drops for Resident #74 and Resident #94, and two insulin pens for Resident #105 that were not labeled with open or discard dates. Additionally, medication refrigerators on 2 South, 2 West, 3rd floor, 4th floor, 5th floor, 6th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00323751) surveys conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals reviewed (1/25/2024 breakfast and 1/26/2024 lunch meals). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy Dining Experience, revised 1/2024, documented the kitchen would provide nourishing, palatable, and attractive meals that met the individuals' daily nutritional needs and food and beverage preference. During an interview on 1/24/2024 at 10:01 AM, Resident #98 stated they did not eat breakfast because the eggs were always cold. During an interview on 1/24/2024 at 10:10 AM, Resident #31 stated the food was always cold. During an interview on 1/24/2024 at 12:53 PM, Resident #185 stated that the food was cold most of the time. During an observation on 1/25/2024 at 8:30 AM, a breakfast tray was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024 the facility did not ensure each resident received at least three meals daily at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests and plans of care for 4 of 6 nursing floors (2 [NAME] and 2 South floors, 3rd floor, 5th floor, and 6th floor) observed. Specifically, resident meal trays were delivered to nursing floors up to 43 minutes after the scheduled mealtimes. Findings include: The facility policy Frequency of Meals revised 1/2024 documented each resident would receive at least three meals daily, at times comparable to typical mealtimes in the community, or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and the plan of care. The 2 South meal delivery times documented Breakfast at 8:30 AM, Lunch at 12:30 PM, Dinner at 5:30 PM. The following observations were made on 2 South: - on 1/24/2024 at 12:57 PM the lunch meal cart arrived on the floor. At 12:58 PM the first lunch tray was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00325885) surveys conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure the facility stored, prepared, distributed, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchens (the main kitchen) reviewed. Specifically, multiple areas of the main kitchen were unclean; the steamer, a hand wash sink, and the high temperature were in disrepair; there was a an expired package of hot dog rolls and an expired jar of peanut butter; there was an unlabeled package of bread crumbs; there was an undated bag of chocolate mix and two opened containers of chicken paste with no opened date; there was a dented can of pears and a dented can of an unknown product; and there was three sections of sheet cake that were not covered. Findings include: A facility policy Cleaning & Sanitation of Dining and Food Service Areas, last reviewed 1/2024, documented: - Cleaned after each use - all appliances, all small equipment, counters, stove tops (range and griddle),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the required quarterly Legionella (type of bacteria that causes Legionnaire's disease) water testing was not completed after 30% of the annual water samples detected Legionella. Findings include: The facility's Legionella Management Plan, Potable Water System, dated December 2022, documented if detected levels of Legionella was greater than 30% it would require immediate implementation of short-term control measures and the water system should be re-sampled no later than 4 weeks after disinfection to determine the efficacy of the treatment. Documentation included procedures to be followed, directives issued, testing performed and procedures for disinfection that prevented exposure to contaminated water. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024 the facility did not ensure they were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member for 2 of 6 units (Unit 2 and Unit 3) reviewed. Specifically, non-functioning call lights were observed on Unit 2 in resident rooms 266, 274, 269, 263, 261, 250, 248, 245, 241, the second floor south shower room, and the second floor dining room; and, on Unit 3 resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings include: The facility policy Answering the Call Light reviewed by the facility 1/2024 documented: - Be sure the call light was plugged in at all times. - Be sure the call light was within easy reach of the resident. - Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. On 1/24/2024 the following observations were made on Unit 2: - At 10:02 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom had no call light cord. - At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00300181, NY00323751, and NY00325885) surveys conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure the residents' rights to a private space for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #3 and #44) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #3 and #44 did not have keys to access a privately locked space. Findings include: The facility policy Locked Drawers and Keys revised 1/2024 documented residents were informed of their right to a locked drawer in which they could store their belongings. Nursing and social work was responsible for ensuring residents were notified upon admission that a key for the locked drawer could be obtained from the maintenance department. If a key was lost or no longer worked, staff informed the maintenance department to repair or replace the key and in the interim the facility offered an alternate space for belongings to be locked. Maintenance was responsible to keep track of room changes and switched keys…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure the results of the most recent Federal/State survey were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. Specifically, the most recent survey results and plan of correction were in a binder in a file bin on the wall, approximately 4-feet off the ground, around the corner from the main front lobby desk, and not easily accessible. There were no notices posted advising the residents, family members and legal representatives of the survey results location. Findings Include: During the Resident Council Meeting on 1/24/2024 at 1:53 PM, 10 anonymous residents stated they did not know where the binder of previous survey results was located. During an observation 1/24/2024 at 3:53 PM, a binder with 3 years of past surveys/complaints was around the corner of the lobby in a plastic file bin on the wall. There were no signs posted throughout the facility identifying the location of survey results. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00299391 and NY320041) surveys conducted 1/24/2023-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #134 and 400) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #135 had injuries of unknown origin that were not thoroughly investigated, and Resident #400 was provided a regular consistency sandwich on a ground consistency diet and was later found unresponsive on the floor and the incident was not investigated. Findings included: The facility policy Accident and Incident Investigation and Reporting reviewed 1/2023 documented all accidents or incidents involving residents should be investigated and reported to the Administrator. The Nurse Supervisor, charge nurse, or Department Director should promptly initiate the investigation and include all pertinent information. Witness statements should be obtained. The Report of Incident/Accident form was to be submitted to the Director of Nursing within 24 hours.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00325885, NY00328424 and NY00331016) conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #38, #64, #80) reviewed. Specifically, - Resident #38 received rapid-acting insulin (starts to lower glucose levels 15 minutes after injection) greater than one hour before meals. - Resident #64 was observed with a vacuum assisted wound closure device (a type of therapy used for wound healing) that was not functioning. - Resident #80 was found on the floor, was not assessed by a qualified professional timely, did not receive a physician ordered X-ray immediately as ordered, and was diagnosed with a right hip fracture. Findings include: The facility policy Lab and Diagnostic Test Results Protocol revised 1/2022 documented the physician would identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00322708 and NY00325885) surveys conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #24) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #24 was observed in their bed with their air mattress (a specialty mattress that provides air flow to relieve pressure) not functioning. Findings include: The facility policy Use of Low Air Loss Mattress revised 1/2022, documented residents would be assessed for the appropriateness of an air mattress based on risk factors and/or the existence of actual or history of pressure injuries. An air mattress would be provided to prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation, and provide pressure relief and reduction. Staff would check at least daily that the air mattress was on, was set appropriately, and functioning. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00299391, NY00322708, and NY00331016) surveys conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and the environment remained free of accident hazards for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #128 and #400) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #400 was given food not consistent with their physician ordered diet, and Resident #128 had an unidentified medication on the floor of their room. Findings include: The facility policy Administering Medications revised 1/2024, documented for residents unavailable to receive medication on the medication pass, the nurse was to return to the missed resident to administer the medication. If a drug was withheld or refused, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the medication administration record space for that specific medication. The individual administering the medications must sign for them in the medication administration record prior to giving the next ones.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00299391 and NY00322708) surveys conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #184) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #184 had a significant weight loss, their nutritional interventions were not reassessed, and the resident had additional weight loss. Additionally, there was no documented evidence medical was made aware of the resident's significant weight loss. Findings include: The facility policy Nutritional Assessment revised 1/2024 documented a nutritional assessment, including current nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition, would be conducted for each resident. The registered dietitian along with the interdisciplinary team would conduct nutritional assessments for each resident upon admission and as indicated by a change in condition that places the resident at risk for impaired nutrition. The nutritional assessment would be a systemic multidisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident being fed by enteral means (tube placed in the stomach for feedings) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #2, #24, and #134) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #2, #24, and #134 did not have their tube feeding formula labeled with a date and time. Findings include: The facility policy Enteral tube feeding via gravity effective 10/1997 and revised 1/2024, documented when administering a tube feeding on the formula label document initials, date, and time the formula was hung/administered, and initial that the label was checked against the order. 1) Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including alcohol induced dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The 10/17/2023 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, was totally dependent on staff for eating, did not have swallowing disorder, had a feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, or obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bedrails for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #88, #160 and #192) reviewed. Specifically, for Residents #88, #160 and #192, there was no documented evidence there were bed rail assessments prior to bed rail installation, the risks and benefits of bed rails were explained to the residents or their representatives, or that consents were obtained prior to bed rail installation. Findings include: The facility policy Proper Use of Side Rails effective 10/2018 with a review date of 1/2024, included: - Side rails were used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or to assist with mobility and transfer. - An assessment would be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for using side rails. - Consent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024-2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with facility assessment for 3 of 8 staff personnel records (Licensed practical nurse #67, licensed practical nurse #68, and registered nurse #69) reviewed. Specifically, licensed practical nurse #67, licensed practical nurse #68 and registered nurse #69 did not receive annual competencies that covered key skill-set areas as outlined in the 2023 facility assessment and per regulations. Findings include: The Facility Assessment Year 2023 received during the survey entrance conference, documented nurse competencies in the facility included: resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during recertification and abbreviated (NY00323751) surveys conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure menus were followed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #64) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #64 had missing menu items from their meal trays and did not receive double entrees as care planned. Findings include: The facility policy Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line Service dated 1/2024 documented tray line positions and set-up procedures would be planned for efficient and orderly delivery. All meals would be checked for accuracy by the food/nutrition staff and the service staff prior to serving of meals. The meal would be checked to ensure that foods were served as listed on the menu. The director of food and nutritional services or designee would be responsible for assuring that all foods needed for meal assembly were present at the appropriate time. Each meal would be checked for proper portion sizes. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys post survey revisit conducted 4/4/2024-4/9/2024, the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use it resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the call bell system for Unit 2 was not functioning properly (see F 919); foods were not maintained at palatable and safe temperatures (see F 804); medication refrigerator temperatures were not consistently logged to ensure maintenance of safe temperatures for medications and education regarding medication refrigerator temperatures and logbooks was not completed as planned (see F 761); and resident areas had fruit flies and floors in disrepair (see F 584). Findings include: The 1/2024 facility policy and procedure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program documented the objective was to provide means to establish and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/24/2024 - 2/1/2024, the facility did not ensure facility equipment was maintained in proper operating condition for 1 of 7 resident floors (5th floor). Specifically, the fifth floor ice machine was not functional. Findings include: The facility could not provide any work orders that documented the fifth floor ice machine was not working. During an observation on 1/24/2024 at 1:00 PM, the fifth floor ice machine dispensed water but not ice. During an observation on 1/26/2024 at 12:25 PM and during a follow-up observation on 1/30/2024 at 1:24 PM, the fifth floor ice machine had been removed from the unit dining room, and there was no ice on the unit. During an interview on 1/30/2024 at 1:26 PM, the Corporate Director of Facilities stated the ice machine was removed from the fifth floor dining room on 1/26/2024 and was not returned to the floor because the facility was awaiting parts. They were not sure how ice was currently being brought to the fifth floor. It was important that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during an abbreviated survey (NY00321085) the facility did not maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 7 nursing units (Unit 2 [NAME] and Unit 7). Specifically, there were active and old roof leaks that caused water damage and water infiltration into two resident areas on Units 2 [NAME] and Unit 7 (corridor adjacent to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], clean linen room on Unit 2 West, and Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings include: Review of the roof vendor quote dated 3/23/2023, documented the need for roof repairs and clean up as well as replacement of materials. Observations made on 8/9/2023 at 12:26 PM on Unit 2 [NAME] included: - an active roof leak within the corridor adjacent to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and the cross-corridor fire doors. - A 33 gallon trash can under a cut out section of ceiling (approximately 1 foot x 3 feet) to catch leaking roof water. There was also water on the floor around the trash can. - A small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00269688 and NY00273974) surveys conducted on 12/13-12/21/21, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 13 residents (Residents #184, and 224) reviewed received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents and/or their environments remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, - Resident #184 exited the secure unit (2S) undetected and made it to a non-resident area, and the incident was not thoroughly investigated, nor was a plan implemented to prevent further unsafe wandering. Resident #184 subsequently eloped from the facility and was found walking in the roadway by the local police after certified nurse aide (CNA) #24 did not appropriately respond when the wander guard system (to alert staff of resident wandering) alarmed. - Resident #224 had a fall in their bathroom on a wet floor. The accident hazard was not addressed timely to prevent falls and the incident was not investigated to ensure a plan was implemented to prevent reoccurrence. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident #31) reviewed was free from physical restraints. Specifically, Resident #31's restraint was not released at least every 2 hours and at meals as care planned. Findings include: The 3/2020 Use of Restraints policy documented restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used upon written order of a physician. Care plans for residents in restraints will reflect interventions that not only address the immediate medical symptom(s), but the underlying problems that may be causing the symptom(s). Care plans shall also include the measures taken to systemically reduce or eliminate the need for restraint use. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, restlessness, and anxiety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00281850, NY00270904, NY00269162 and NY00281169) conducted on 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition. Specifically, Resident #2 was not assisted with meals timely. Findings include: Resident #2 had a diagnosis including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The 11/26/21 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired; required extensive assistance with eating; had a 5% weight loss in the last month; and was not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen. The 11/22/21 physician's orders documented the resident was on a regular diet with pureed texture and nectar thickened liquids. The 12/7/21 comprehensive care plan (CCP) documented the resident was at risk for malnutrition, needed an altered consistency diet, and required extensive assistance with eating. The care instructions, active 12/20/21, documented the resident required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 12/13-12/21/21, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #145) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically, Resident #145 had a significant weight loss which was not reassessed timely by clinical nutrition staff. Findings include: The facility's revised 1/2021, Weight Assessment and Intervention policy documented: - Nursing staff will weigh residents. - Weights will be recorded in each unit's weight book and in the resident's medical record. - Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be taken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the registered dietitian (RD) in writing. Verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. - The RD will review the unit's weights by the 15th of the month. - Negative weight trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether criteria for significant weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted on 12/13/21- 12/21/21, the facility failed to ensure the menu was prepared in advance, followed, and reflect, based on reasonable efforts, input from the residents for 4 of 35 residents reviewed (Residents #28, 91, 111, and 215). Specifically, Residents #28, 91, and 111 received a substitution of peas instead of spinach at the 12/13/21 lunch without documented rationale for the substitution. Resident #28 received incorrect items at 2 meals and Resident #215's meal preferences were not honored, and they received foods they did not like. Finding included: The 1/2021 Food Services policy and procedure documented individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Upon the resident's admission (or within 24) hours after his/her admission the dietitian or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. MENU NOT FOLLOWED: 1) The 2021 Fall/Winter Menu Week 2 Menu documented the vegetable served for lunch meal on 12/13/21 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted on 12/13/21 through 12/21/21, the facility failed to provide food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 2 test trays reviewed. Specifically, a breakfast tray was served at unpalatable temperatures to Resident #2 and Residents #6, 28, #103, 111, and 133 reported receiving food at unpalatable temperatures. Findings include: The undated Test Tray Audit form documents acceptable temperatures of hot foods including entrees and hot cereals should be 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above; and cold foods including beverages should be 40 degrees. Resident interviews included: - On 12/13/21 at 2:24 PM on Unit 2 West, Resident #28 stated the hot food was not served hot. - On 12/13/21 at 2:32 PM on Unit 2 West, Resident #111 stated the food did not arrive on time and was cold at times. - On 12/14/21 at 8:48 AM on Unit 7, Resident #133 stated the food was unbelievably bad, the hot food was not hot, and the cold foods were semi-warm. Ice cream was often melted by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations and codes affecting 1 of 7 units (Unit 2S) reviewed. Specifically, the Unit 2S dining room's heat was not working, residents were displaced to their rooms and hallways for meals, and the facility did not report the heat outage to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) as required. Findings include: On 12/13/21 at 10:38 AM, the Unit 2S dining room was observed to be locked. On 12/13/21 at 10:40 AM, licensed practical nurse (LPN) Manager #2 stated the dining room was closed because the heat was not working. Residents were to eat in their rooms or the hallways. At 12:25 PM, LPN Manager #2 stated there were 16 residents who typically ate in the dining room that were currently eating in the hallway due to the closed dining room. LPN #2 stated the dining room had been closed for 2 to 3 weeks. When observed on 12/13/21 at 4:10 PM, the Unit 2S dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to furnish services by a person or agency outside the facility if the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a specific service for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #6 and 175) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 missed a virtual medical appointment; and Resident #175's outpatient nephrology appointment was canceled, the cancellation was not communicated, and the resident went to the canceled appointment with a family member. Findings include: The 1/2021 Consultations policy documents the facility is responsible to provide consultation services for any resident as needed. The facility assumes responsibility for obtaining services that meet professional standards. The attending physician will write an order for a consult and the reason in the medical record. Designated staff will schedule the consult; if using outside consultant, the employee will arrange the appointment, transportation, and notification of resident designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00272513) conducted 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #83) reviewed. Specifically, registered nurse (RN) #30 did not change gloves after removing an old dressing and cleansing a wound and did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care for Resident #83. Findings include: The facility policy Wound Care reviewed 1/2021, documented the following procedural steps; arrange supplies, wash, and dry hands thoroughly, put on exam gloves, remove dressing, pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle, wash, and dry hands thoroughly, put on gloves, apply treatment as indicated, discard all soiled laundry in soiled laundry container, remove disposable gloves and discard into designated container,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to conduct testing based on parameters set forth by the Secretary for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #76, 132, and 156) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #76, 132 and 156 were identified as having a close contact with a COVID-19 positive staff member (certified nurse aide, CNA, #54) and were not tested per the outbreak testing guidelines on Day 2. Findings include: The 9/10/21 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes documents residents with close contact with someone with SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of vaccination status, should have a series of two viral tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In these situations, testing is recommended immediately (but not earlier than 2 days after the exposure) and, if negative, again 5-7 days after the exposure. During an interview on 12/16/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00273974) conducted from12/13/21-12/21/21, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 7 resident units (2S Unit). Specifically, the 2S Unit (secured dementia unit) elevator was not disabled by the presence of a wander alert bracelet (used to alert staff of resident wandering). Subsequently, Resident #184 was able to take the elevator to the first floor, unsupervised, while wearing a wander alert bracelet. Findings include: The facility policy Wander Guard System revised 1/2021 documented: - The facility would provide and maintain a secure environment to prevent negative outcomes for residents who exhibit unsafe wandering and or elopement behaviors. - The Wander Alert system will alarm when a wanderer or potential eloper attempts to leave the facility unaccompanied. - Alarms are placed on all exits on the first floor,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$132,759 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $110,801 — penalty dated 2025-06-05
- $21,958 — penalty dated 2024-07-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE GRAND HEALTHCARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HERITAGE ACQUISITION HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 95% | since 02/15/2019 |
| STRAUSS, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 90% | since 02/15/2019 |
| STRAUSS, MERYL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 02/15/2019 |
| ROGERS, ERIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/15/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335600. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.