The Springs Of Park Ave

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 73.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility did not ensure incontinence care was provided in a manner that was timely and promoted cleanliness, good hygiene, and/or prevented infection for two (Resident #27 and Resident #54) of two sampled residents. The findings include: Resident #27 During an observation on 08/03/2025 at 11:59 AM, this surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 provide incontinence care to Resident #27. CNA #1 had the resident roll to their left side. This surveyor noted Resident #27's incontinence brief was saturated with urine, there were two wet incontinence pads, and the resident's fitted sheet was wet. CNA #1 wiped the resident's buttocks towards their genitals. The direction in which CNA #1 cleaned the resident's genital area could introduce bacteria into the body and cause an infection. This surveyor noted when Resident #27 was rolled to the right side, their gown was wet from just below the waist to above the left knee. CNA #1 did not clean Resident #27's left side, which also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for one of one meal observed. The findings include: During an observation on 08/03/2025 at 12:43 PM, this surveyor observed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #7 use a #20 scoop, which was equal to 1.5 ounces, to serve a single portion of ground roast turkey to the residents who received mechanical soft diets instead of 3 ounces, per the menu. During an observation and interview on 08/03/2025 at 12:48 PM, this surveyor observed DC #7 using a #12 scoop, which was equal to 1/3 cup, to serve a single portion of pureed baked sweet potato, instead of 1/2 cup per the menu. DC #7 also used the #12 scoop (1/3 cup) to serve a single portion of pureed cut green beans, instead of a 3/8 cup per the menu. This surveyor also observed DC #7 use a #16 scoop, which was equal to 1/4 cup, to serve a single portion of pureed ham, instead of a 1/3 cup as per the menu. In addition, this surveyor observed there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food items stored in the freezer were covered or sealed, that dietary staff washed their hands between handling dirty and clean equipment, and hot food items were maintained at the required temperatures for one of one meal observed. The findings include: During a concurrent observation and interview on 08/03/2025 at 10:29 AM, this surveyor observed an open box of fish on a shelf in the freezer. The box was not covered or sealed, which exposed it to freezer burn and cross contamination. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #4 stated leaving the box open would cause the food to have freezer burn or could cause potential cross contamination. During a concurrent observation and interview on 08/03/2025 at 11:08 AM, DC #4 pushed the blender motor to the edge of the counter, contaminating her hands. Without washing her hands, she used her bare hand to pick up a clean blade and attached it to the base of the blender to puree food items for the residents who received pureed diets. This surveyor asked DC #4 what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) by wearing required Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and staff failed to change their gloves during perineal care for a resident on EBP before touching resident ' s lift pad, clean brief, clothing, and linens to prevent cross contamination and the risk for infection for 1 of 1 sampled (Resident #6) resident. Findings include: 1. A review of Medical Diagnoses, revealed Resident #6 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, kidney disease, bipolar, and heart failure. 2. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/30/2024, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 (8-12 suggest moderate cognitive impairment). Section H0300 and H0400 indicated Resident #6 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. 3. On 12/30/2024 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign outside Resident #6's door, and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report to the state survey agency when a resident, that was care planned not to leave the facility without supervision, left the facility without staff knowledge for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 sampled resident identified as an elopement risk. 1. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/05/2024 indicated Resident #8 had a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia, coronary artery disease, malnutrition and scored 12 (8-12 indicates moderate impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. Resident #8 ' s Care Plan with an initiation date of 05/30/2024, indicated, Focus; Risk for elopement/wandering identified, Goal: The resident will not leave the facility unattended b. An Elopement Assessment dated 10/20/24, for Resident #8 indicated, 6. Resistant to nursing home placement a) Yes 7. Expresses desire to go home a) Yes 8. Exit Seeking a) Yes 9. Evidence Sundowning behavior [increase in behaviors at the close of day] a) Yes; scored 9 [7-14 indicates moderate risk];…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Through observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure open food packages were properly closed, ensure walls and floors were in sanitary condition, canned goods were dent free, dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks, chemicals were kept away from serving items, food on the steam table was properly covered, and proper serving sizes were provided. The findings are as follows: 1) On 05/05/24 at 10:45 AM, two trash cans were not covered by the hand washing sink and the reach in refrigerator in the main kitchen prep area. The Registered Dietician stated trash cans should not be opened if not being used to prevent cross-contamination. 2) On 05/05/24 at 10:46 AM, a coffee filter containing coffee and one pitcher container were uncovered and sat next to the hand washing sink. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed the coffee in the coffee filter and pitcher not being covered could cause cross-contamination because something could land on them. 3) On 05/05/24 at 10:47 AM a plate warmer contained plates with serving side face up and uncovered. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. An observation of a medication pass performed on 08/16/23 at 7:53 AM resulted in the identification of 3 errors in 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.00 %. The findings are: 1. Resident #176 had a physician's order for Aspirin Oral Capsule 81 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for blood thinner. a. On 05/06/24 at 08:10 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 gave Aspirin enteric coated 81 MG (Enteric-coated aspirin is designed to resist dissolving and being absorbed in the stomach. the purpose of taking low-dose aspirin is to help prevent the development of harmful artery-blocking blood clots. However, with enteric-coated aspirin, research indicates that bloodstream absorption may be delayed and reduced, compared to regular aspirin absorption). 2. Resident #176 had a physician's order for B Complex-C Oral Tablet (B Complex w/ C) Give 1 tablet by mouth one-time a day for supplement (Vitamin B with vitamin C added). a.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store controlled medications in a permanently affixed container, and to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 01:30 PM, the surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 what the procedure was to dispose of medications if a resident discharges or passes away in the facility. She stated the take the narcotics and the narcotic book to the Director of Nursing's (DON) office, count the medications, and then sign them over for her to send them out of facility. a. On [DATE] at 01:50 PM, LPN #2 was asked what the procedure was to dispose of medications if a resident discharges or passes away in the facility. She stated they take the narcotics and the narcotic book to the DON's office, count, and sign them over for her to send them out of facility. A b. On [DATE] at 01:50 PM, the surveyor observed the container used to store controlled medications in the medication room on Hall C…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an advanced directive was readily accessible in the electronic health record for 1 (Resident #24) of 1 sampled resident whose electronic health record (EHR) was reviewed for an advanced directive. The findings are: 1. Resident #24 had diagnoses of dementia and type 2 diabetes mellitus as documented on an order summary. a. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 (00-07 indicates severely impaired) b. A Care Plan dated [DATE] documented the residents did not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to follow the do not resuscitate (DNR) instructions as detailed inside the Advance Directive and/or Living Will. c. On [DATE] at 11:03 AM, Resident #24's electronic health record (EHR) was reviewed and a resuscitation designation order dated [DATE] documented the resident had an advance directive but this surveyor did not locate it in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care was completed within 48 hours of a residents admission to address activities of daily living, to promote continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff for 1 (Resident #123) of 1 sampled resident whose electronic health record (EHR) was reviewed for a 48 hour baseline care plan. The findings are: 1. Resident #123 had diagnoses of full incontinence of feces (unable to control bowel movements) and adult failure to thrive, as documented on an Order Summary. a. An entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/03/2024 documented Resident #123's most recent admission/entry or reentry to the facility was 05/03/2024. b. A care plan dated 05/05/2024 did not address Resident #123's activities of daily living (ADLs) for bathing, personal hygiene, oral hygiene, mobility, dressing, grooming or toileting for bowel incontinence. c. An admission assessment dated [DATE] on pages 20 through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR