The Springs Searcy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 245 beds and averages 130.7 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 114 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #5) of four residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred with the proper equipment, and the number of staff members required, according to the resident's assessed needs, which resulted in a fractured hip. The findings include: Review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #5 with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain, dementia, polyosteoarthritis, disorders of bone density and structure, chronic pain syndrome and anxiety. Review of a five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/19/2025, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #5 was dependent for chair/bed transfers, toileting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store medications at proper temperatures to preserve their integrity.The findings are:Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to store medications at proper temperatures to preserve the integrity of the medications for one of two medication refrigerators observed. The findings include: During an observation of Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], near Hall 8 on 03/24/2026 at 12:40 PM, Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 opened the narcotic fridge door and stated the temperature of the interior of the refrigerator was 32 degrees Fahrenheit according to visual observation of a thermometer secured to the inside of the refrigerator door. This surveyor observed a buildup of ice approximately three inches tall by six inches wide by seven inches deep in the freezer compartment of the dorm sized refrigerator. The refrigerator contained insulins and other medications. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dialysis was coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for the last two quarters for one (Resident #8) of two residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The findings include: Review of Resident #8's Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #8 had diagnoses which included stroke, multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the protective covering surrounding nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord), and end stage renal disease (ESRD) stage 5 (the kidneys have lost nearly all ability to work resulting in dialysis or kidney transplant to live). Review of a quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/19/2026, revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #8 was not on dialysis. Review of a quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/24/2025, also revealed Resident #8 was not on dialysis. Review of Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves when contaminated during wound care for one (Resident #10) of two residents reviewed for wound care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing wound care to Resident #10 who was on Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP). The findings include: Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #10 with diagnoses that included blastomycosis (lung infection) and pressure ulcer of sacral (base of spine) region, stage 4. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/09/2025, revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #10's Care Plan revised on 03/11/2026, revealed the resident required EBP related to a chronic wound (stage 4 Pressure Ulcer to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to update the facility assessment to include staffing levels needed for specific shifts such as days, evenings, weekends, and memory care units. The findings include: A review of the Facility Assessment Tool indicated that it was last updated on 07/04/2024, with a staffing table that stated Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), with 6 to 9 daily average of full time employees (FTEs), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (including restorative) with 22-30 daily average of FTEs, Nursing Administration (Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing) 4 to 5 daily average of FTEs, Social Services with 1 to 2 daily average of FTEs, Dietary Manager with a daily average of 1 FTE, food and nutrition services staff with a daily average of 6 to 8 FTEs, Administration with a daily average of 2 FTEs, Activities with a daily average of 3 FTEs, Environmental services/Maintenance with a daily average of 1 to 2 FTEs, Therapy Staff with a daily average of 2 to 5 FTEs, Infection Preventionist with a daily average of 1 FTE, 24/7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dishware were not exposed to dust, or other contamination; kitchen equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; dietary employees washed their hands or changed gloves before handling food items and clean equipment when contaminated; expired food products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria, and ice machine and ice scoop holder were maintained in clean and sanitary condition. The findings are: 1. On The following observations were made in the kitchen: a. On 9/30/2024 at 10:18 AM, 24 small plates, located on the bottom storage shelf in the kitchen, had food serving side uncovered. b. On 9/30/2024 at 10:21AM, the can opener had an orangish-brown and a white fuzzy unknown substance adhered to the blade. c. On 9/30/2024 at 10:26AM, a trash can was located next to the microwave used to heat residents' food. d. On 9/30/2024 at 10:27AM, 12 drinking cups had brown stains on the inside. 2. On 10/01/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for 01 (Resident #101) of 2 (Resident #101, #9) sample mix residents reviewed for care plan; and to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 (Resident #9) of 2 (Resident #101, #9) sample mix residents reviewed for care plan. The findings include: On 10/1/24 at 9:43 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Resident #101 and they revealed they are a smoker and that they have a smoking apron offered to them during smoke break, but they don't wear it. Review of Resident #101's Care Plan with an initiated date of 2/7/2024 did not note the resident is wear a smoking apron. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/10/2024 revealed Resident #101 scored a 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The MDS also revealed Resident #101 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of cold and hot foods at temperatures that were acceptable to residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 2 of 2 meals observed on the following halls: 8, 10, 11, 200, 300 and 500. The findings are: 1. A Grievance Form dated 7/3/2024, was reviewed and indicated cold food as a concern at the supper meal. 2. On 10/01/24 at 12:46 PM, an unheated food cart that contained 17 lunch trays was delivered to the Hall 8 dining room by the Certified Nursing Assistant #3. At 12:52 PM, immediately after the last resident tray was served in the dining room, the temperatures of the food items on the test tray from the cart were checked by the Dietary Manager with the following results: a. Milk, 48 Degrees Fahrenheit. b. Vegetable blend 114 .6 Degrees Fahrenheit. c. Pureed vegetable 108 Degrees Fahrenheit. d. Pureed carrots 112.9 Degrees Fahrenheit. e. Pureed potatoes 105.5 Degrees Fahrenheit. f. Vegetable blend106.9 Degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who were assessed to wear a smoking apron wore one during the facility allotted smoke break time, and to ensure residents were not in possession of a lighter for 1 (Resident #101) of 1 sample mix residents reviewed for smoking. The findings include: On 10/1/24 at 9:43 AM, Surveyor interviewed Resident #101 who revealed they are a smoker and that they have a smoking apron offered to them during smoke break, but they don't wear it. Review of Resident #101's Care Plan with an initiated date of 2/7/2024 revealed Resident #101 was a smoker, facility was to store all smoking materials and the resident was to be supervised while smoking. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/10/2024 revealed Resident #101 scored a 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The MDS also revealed Resident #101 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves while obtaining a blood sample from a fingerstick for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. The findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/09/2024, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact, and had a diagnosis which included diabetes mellitus during the 7 day look back period. A review of the Care Plan indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus without complications, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and epilepsy. A review of Resident #1's Care Plan, revised 04/18/2023, revealed the resident had Diabetes Mellitus. Interventions included diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor, observe for side effects and effectiveness of insulin, and fasting blood sugar as ordered by doctor. A review of the Physician's Orders, for May 2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; 1 of 2 ice machines and 1 of 2 ice scoop holders were maintained in clean and sanitary condition; floors, ceiling tiles, equipment were free of stain, debris, dirt, rust chipped; tiles were replaced, expired dairy products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, failed to ensure residents were offered hand sanitation before lunch, and staff performed hand hygiene before handling resident's food without gloves for 1 of 1 (Resident #1). The failed practices had the potential to 100 affect residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings are. On 10/23/23 at 9:06 AM, an opened, unsealed bag of hot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-03-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR