The Springs Of Red Oak

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 52.6 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.451 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure transportation provider safely off-loaded a resident in a wheelchair from the facility transportation van to prevent potential injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Residents #1 and #2) sampled residents who required transport in a wheelchair on the transportation provider's van. The failed practice had the potential to affect 46 residents that resided in the facility per census received 2/7/2024. This failed practice resulted past Immediate Jeopardy, which caused or could have caused serious harm, injury, or death to Resident #1, who rolled out of the van in a manual wheelchair and fell on the lift that was ground level resulting in a back injury. The facility was notified of the past Immediate Jeopardy on 2/8/2024 at 2:00 pm. The findings are: 1. Resident #1's was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/28/2023…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food preparation and serving pieces were washed, dried, and stored in sanitary conditions for one of one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food preparation and serving dishware were washed, dried, and stored in sanitary conditions for one of one kitchen that served 35 residents with regular diets, 11 with mechanical soft diets, and two with pureed diets. The findings include: During an observation and concurrent interview on 05/16/2026 at 11:25 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) retrieved pans that were stored on a shelf under the serving table. Five quarter sheet pans were observed. One had particles, described as brown and soft by the DM, in it, and the particles transferred to a white napkin when the pan was wiped by the DM. The DM stated that because they were soft, it was probably breadcrumbs. Three of the other quarter sheet pans were observed by this surveyor and DM to be wet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention measures during a medication administration for 1 resident (Resident #40) out of 4 residents observed to be given medications. Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper infection control during medication administration for one (Resident #40) of four residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: Review of Resident #40's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #40 on 03/02/2026 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, dementia, and hypertension. Review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 03/03/2026, indicated Resident #40 had a score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #40's Order Summary revealed resident received (generic) medication for hypertension, with a start date of 03/03/2026. During an observation and concurrent interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1(Resident #21) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dignity. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/2024, revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a Plan of Care for Resident #21 initiated 08/07/2024, revealed Resident #21 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to (r/t) needing assistance with ADLs. On 1/08/25 at 11:17 AM, this surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 push Resident #21 past the nurse's station in a shower chair. This surveyor noted Resident #21 was not fully covered. On 1/08/25 at 12:54 PM, during an interview CNA #2 stated Resident #21 was not fully covered while being transported through a common area which could be a dignity issue. On 01/09/25 at 8:40 AM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of personal and medical information was protected for 1 (Resident #21) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for personal and medical information confidentiality. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a Plan of Care for Resident #21 initiated [DATE], revealed Resident #21 requested that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures be performed. On [DATE] at 11:50 AM, this surveyor observed an unattended, unlocked tablet which displayed Resident #21 ' s personal and medical information. This surveyor was able to visualize Resident 21's name, date of birth , code status, and physician's order on the unlocked tablet. On [DATE] at 12:00 PM, during an observation and interview the Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to coordinate with state authority to determine if placement in the facility was appropriate or incorporate the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment with if any recommendations from the level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into the resident assessment, care planning, and transition of care for 1 (Resident #46) of 1 sampled resident reviewed. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/2024, revealed Resident #46 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #46 had diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar disorder, and Schizophrenia. A review of a Plan of Care revised 10/28/2024, for Resident #46 revealed Resident #46 received antipsychotic medication related to (r/t) bipolar disorder and behaviors. On 01/07/25 at 2:20 PM, this surveyor requested the level II evaluation report for Resident #46 from the Director of Nursing (DON). On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the necessary monitoring and precautions related to the use of tobacco products to meet the needs of the resident and minimize the potential for complications for 1 (Resident #55) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for tobacco use. The findings are: 1.Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/17/2024, indicated Resident #55 had diagnoses of heart failure, stroke, and tobacco use, scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and was a current tobacco user. a. On 01/07/25 at 1:40 PM, Resident #55 was observed in the facility ' s designated smoking area, sitting in their wheelchair with a smoking apron on, smoking a cigarette. A staff member was present supervising the residents that were smoking. b. A form titled Smoking Safety Screen dated 11/13/2024, indicated Resident #55 was safe to smoke with a smoking apron and staff supervision. c. Resident #55…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a discharge summary which included a recapitalization of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and reconciliation of all pre and post discharge medications for 1 (Resident #111) of 3 sampled residents. The findings include: A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/20/2024, revealed Resident #111 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a Plan of Care for Resident #111 initiated 10/17/2024, revealed Resident #111 or representative wished to be discharged home with home health and durable medical equipment (DME) as needed. A review of the Discharge Note dated 11/01/2024, indicated Resident #111 was discharged home with home health. On 01/09/25 at 8:40 AM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the discharge summary was not completed for Resident #111. A policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan indicated when a resident's discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #39) of 1 sampled resident received wound care according to the physician's order. The findings include: A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/20/2024, revealed Resident #39 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 indicating severely impaired cognition. A review of a Plan of Care for Resident #39, revised 11/20/2024, revealed Resident #39 had a pressure ulcer to left heel. According to the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), Resident #39 had a physician's order for treatment for left heel. The order noted, clean heel with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply collagen and hydrogel, then cover with dry dressing daily until wound is resolved. The TAR noted treatment was completed on 1/01/2025 and 1/05/2025. On 1/08/2025 at 12:53 PM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated treatment to Resident #39 ' s left foot should be done daily, but it was not signed off on the TAR indicating completion. The DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information on a daily basis, to include the facility name, the current date, the number and actual hours worked by staff, and the resident census. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The findings are: a. On 01/07/25 at 8:30 AM, this surveyor noted nursing staffing posted for Monday 1/6 at the beginning of the shift which included facility name, date, and the total number and actual hours worked per shift for RNs, LPN, CNAs who are responsible for resident care. b. On 01/08/25 at 11:30 AM, this surveyor noted nursing staffing posted for Monday 1/6. c. On 01/08/25 at 4:45 PM, this surveyor noted nursing staffing posted remained Monday 1/6. d. During an interview on 01/09/25 at 8:16 AM, with the Administrator regarding nursing staff posting remained Monday 1/6. The Administrator stated Human Resources does that and she was not present, and she forgot. e. During an interview on 01/09/25 at 9:01 AM, with the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure gradual psychotropic (anti-anxiety) dose reductions (GDR) were attempted in the absence of a physician's documented evaluation of the specific risks versus benefits of continuing the as needed (PRN) medication past 14 days and a documented explanation as to why a dose reduction attempt would be contraindicated, in order to ascertain the smallest effective dose and minimize the potential for adverse drug effects for 1(Resident # 43) of 1 sampled resident. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/10/2024, revealed Resident #43 had a Staff Assessment of Mental Status (SAMS) which indicated memory problems. A review of a Plan of Care for Resident #43 initiated 11/05/2024, revealed Resident #43 used anti-anxiety medications related to anxiety disorder. A review of the Pharmacy [ Medication Regimen Review] MRR - Nursing Recommendation dated 06/17/2024, indicated Resident #43 had an order for [name brand anti-anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,935 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,935 — penalty dated 2024-02-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $812K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR