The Springs Of Waldron

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 66.8 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to ensure that nutritionally balanced meals were provided for the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 12/09/2024, the menu for the noon meal documented residents on pureed regular diets and on mechanical soft diets were to receive 4 ounces (oz) of meat balls in sauce. 2. On 12/9/24 at 12:11 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 placed 16 meatballs into a blender and ground. DC #1 poured the ground meatballs into a pan and placed it on the steam table to be served to 17 residents who required mechanical soft diets. 3. On 12/9/24 at 12:30 PM, during the noon meal service, DC #1 used a 2-ounce spoon to serve a single portion of ground meatballs to eight (8) residents on mechanical soft diets instead of 4 ounces. At 12:51 PM, the 16 meatballs prepared to be served to 17 residents ran out after serving 8 residents 2 ounces instead of 4 ounces. 4. On 12/9/24 at 12:53 PM, DC #1 placed 21 meat balls into a pan and handed it to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the dry storage areas, refrigerator, and freezer were covered and sealed, expired food items were promptly removed, and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 12/9/24 at 11:13 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen areas: a. An opened box of baking soda was in the cabinet above the food preparation counter. The box had an expiration date of 11/27/2024. The Dietary Manager (DM) was interviewed and was asked what she use baking soda for. The DM stated the staff used it when a recipe calls for it, but they had not used it to bake anything in a long time. b. Five (5) boxes of baking soda were in a cabinet above the food preparation counter. The boxes had an expiration date of 11/27/2024. c. An opened box of brown sugar was on a shelf above the food preparation counter. The bag was not sealed. d. An opened bag of grits was on the shelf above the food preparation counter. The bag was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene when providing care for 2 (Residents #5, #6) of 3 (Residents #4, #5, #6) sampled residents. The finding include: 1. A review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with the Assessment Reference Date of 9/15/2024, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate impaired cognition. Resident #5 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. a. A plan of care for Resident #5, revision date 8/15/2023, revealed Resident #5 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit related to impaired mobility, weakness, and fluctuation in mental status. b. On 12/10/2024 at 1:45 PM, this surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 and CNA #3 did not use proper hand hygiene while providing care to Resident #5. This surveyor observed CNA #2 apply a clean brief and place a pillow under the resident's knees with dirty gloves. c. On 12/10/2024 at 2:00PM, CNA #3 stated hand hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided to 1 (Resident #5) of 3 (Residents #4, #5, #6) sampled residents in a manner to promote cleanliness and/or prevent skin breakdown. The findings include: A review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with the Assessment Reference Date of 9/15/2024, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate impaired cognition. Resident #5 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. A plan of care for Resident #5, revision date 8/15/2023, revealed Resident #5 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit related to impaired mobility, weakness, and fluctuation in mental status. On 12/10/2024 at 1:45 PM, this surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 and CNA #3 provide incontinence care to Resident #5, who had been incontinent of bladder. CNA #2 and CNA #3 did not clean all areas of the perineal and buttock areas that had been exposed to urine. On 12/10/2024 at 2:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have measures in place to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne diseases in building water system. The facility failed to have staff use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing care to a resident on droplet precautions for 1 (Resident # 2) sampled resident. The findings include: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Water Management Program dated 02/12/2024, indicated the following: a. The control measures, locations, and frequency-controlled measures shall be implemented at the location of risk areas on a weekly basis by the maintenance director or designee. Common control measures include but are not limited to the following: i. Visual inspection ii. Disinfection levels iii. Temperature checks. b. Monitor and respond- when it is determined that the control limits are not usually met, the maintenance director shall report to the water management team and corrective actions shall occur. Control measures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Administrator was responsible for the overall operation of the facility. The findings are: 1. Resident #04 expired in the facility on [DATE]. a. A Nursing Progress Note dated [DATE] at 3:54 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #01 documented, This nurse went into residents room to check on her and no vitals were obtained. No respirations noted. No heart beat auscultated. Time of death was pronounced by this nurse at 1449 [2:49 PM]. Family at beside. Administrator, DON [Director of Nursing], ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing], Dr. [Name], and [Nurse Consultant Name] all notified of time of death. [Name] Funeral Home was called at 1500 [3:00 PM]. Body picked up . b. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:27 PM, the County Coroner confirmed no one from the nursing home or the Medical Director had called her office to report Resident #04 had expired and time of death needed to be called. c. During an interview on [DATE] at 04:05 PM, the Funeral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0836 — isolated
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes by failing to ensure a death was reported to the Coroner's office. The findings are: 1. Resident #04 expired in the facility on [DATE]. a. A Nursing Progress Note dated [DATE] at 3:54 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #01 documented, This nurse went into residents room to check on her and no vitals were obtained. No respirations noted. No heart beat auscultated. Time of death was pronounced by this nurse at 1449 [2:49 PM]. Family at beside. Administrator, DON [Director of Nursing], ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing], Dr. [Name], and [Nurse Consultant Name] all notified of time of death. [Name] Funeral Home was called at 1500 [3:00 PM]. Body picked up . b. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:27 PM, the County Coroner confirmed no one from the nursing home or the Medical Director had called her office to report Resident #04 had expired and time of death…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0841 — isolated
  Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director fulfilled his/her responsibility for the implementation of resident care policies and/or the coordination of medical care in the facility. The findings are: 1. Resident #04 expired in the facility on [DATE]. a. A Nursing Progress note dated [DATE] at 3:54 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #01 documented, This nurse went into residents room to check on her and no vitals were obtained. No respirations noted. No heart beat auscultated. Time of death was pronounced by this nurse at 1449 [2:49 PM]. Family at beside. Administrator, DON [Director of Nursing], ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing], Dr. [Name], and [Nurse Consultant Name] all notified of time of death. [Name] Funeral Home was called at 1500 [3:00 PM]. Body picked up . b. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:27 PM, the County Coroner confirmed no one from the nursing home or the Medical Director had called her office to report Resident #04 had expired and time of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened packages of food were sealed and dated in the dry storage room to maintain food freshness and prevent the potential for infestation, and the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. The failed practices had the potential to affect 50 residents who received a meal tray from the kitchen, as documented on a list provided by the Business Office Manager on 8/22/23 at 12:43 PM. The findings included: On 08/21/2023 with Dietary Employee #1, the following was observed: a. At 9:56 AM, there was one bag of cookie wafers unsealed and undated. b. Dietary Employee #1 at 10:07 AM, wiped the area of the ice machine where the ice is dispensed with a white napkin. Observation of the white napkin after Dietary Employee #1 completed wiping the ice machine showed dark brownish black particles on the napkin. The Surveyor asked Dietary Employee #1 to describe what is on the napkin? Dietary Employee #1 stated, I would say it's mold. During interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve residents in a manner that promoted dignity for 3 (Residents #2, #22, #26) of 9 (Residents #2, #22, #25, #26, #29, #31, #36, #42, #43 ) sampled residents that eat their meals in the dining room. The findings included: On 08/21/2023 at 12:06 PM the Surveyor observed Resident #2 seated at a table in the dining room with another resident. The second resident received a lunch tray at 12:08 PM, while Resident #2 did not receive a lunch tray until 12:17 PM. The second resident had completed eating their lunch before Resident #2's tray arrived. On 08/21/2023 at 12:08 PM the Surveyor observed Resident #22 seated at a table in the dining room with another resident. A lunch tray was delivered to each resident at 12:08 PM, but Resident #22 did not receive assistance with eating until 12:16 PM. On 08/21/2023 at 12:10 PM the Surveyor observed Resident #26 seated at a table in the dining room with two other residents. A lunch tray was delivered to the other two residents at 12:14 PM. Resident #26 did not receive a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR