The Springs Broadway

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

24.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 79.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform ADLs to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal care for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform ADLs to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal care for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed. The findings include:A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #2 on 02/16/2026 with diagnoses that included type-2 diabetes, malnutrition, depression, and unsteadiness on feet.A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2026, revealed that Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed, Resident #2 needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, chair/bed transfer, toilet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADL) were performed, and nail care was completed for 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #49) residents of 8 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The findings are: A review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living, Supporting revised in March 2025, indicated that Policy Statement: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 4. If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or at a different time or having another staff member speak with the resident may be appropriate. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #9 with diagnoses that included: stroke, type 2 diabetes, unsteadiness on feet, anxiety disorder, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that limited range of motion did not worsen for 2 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #49) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for range of motion. The findings include: A review of the facility policy Resident Mobility and Range of Motion revised in July 2024, 1. Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in the range of motion (ROM). 2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. 3. Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable. A review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living, supporting revised in March 2025 indicated, If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or at a different time or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was in the proper form for the residents, affecting six residents with orders for pureed diets in the facility. The findings include: A review of the facility policy QRT Food Palatability issued on 9/1/2021 indicated that Food and liquids are prepared and served in a manner, form, and texture to meet resident's needs. A review of the Recipe Pureed Chicken Pot Pie indicated Blend until smooth adding liquid/thickener needed to obtain a pudding like consistency. On 03/25/2025 at 10:35 AM, this surveyor observed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #2 add 8 four-ounce scoops of chicken pot pie to the food processor. When the chicken pot pie was placed in the stainless-steel bin after being pureed, this surveyor observed chunks of carrots, chicken, and peas in the puree. DC #2 stated that consistency should be pudding like for pureed diets. On 03/25/2025 at 10:45 AM, this surveyor observed DC #2 add 9 four-ounce scoops of broccoli and cauliflower in the food processor. DC #2 added approximately 1 and 1/2 cups…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that cross contamination did not occur during lunch service for one out of one kitchen. The findings include: A review of the facility policy Quick Resource Tool: Safe Food Handling issued on 9/1/2021, indicated 1. Dining Services staff will be responsible for food preparation procedures that avoid contamination by potentially harmful physical, biological, and chemical contamination. On 3/24/2025 at 11:06 AM, the 4-ounce scoop for the cream of corn fell into the pan. DC #1 pulled it out, using ungloved hands and touching the food in the process. DC #1 then took the scoop to the dishwasher. This surveyor observed pieces of cream of corn on tips of fingers on both hands. On 3/24/2025 at 11:15 AM, while observing lunch service, DC #2 touched the inside of the bowl before adding baked beans. On 3/24/2025 at 11:20 AM, while observing lunch service, DC #3 touched the middle of the plate before adding food. On 3/24/2025 at 11:22 AM, while observing lunch service, DC #2 touched the inside of the bowl…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to serve a palatable meal for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for meal service. The findings include: The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/25/2024 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the Care Plan, indicated Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Functional quadriplegia, Hemiplegia, unspecified, affecting the left nondominant side, Adult failure to thrive, and Legal blindness. A review of Resident #1's Care Plan, with an initiated date of 11/20/2020, and a revised date of 01/19/2024, revealed the resident had ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) left hemiplegia, generalized weakness, blindness, poor activity tolerance, pain due to compression fracture. Interventions included eating: dependent on staff. A review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and homelike environment for the residents to promote dignity and prevent the potential injury for 15 (Rooms 210, 216, 222, 303, 304, 306, 309, 310, 313, 319, 320, 321, 322, 405, and 401) in the facility. The findings are: On 01/30/24 at 09:20 AM, the following observations were made during environmental rounds: a. room [ROOM NUMBER]: In the left-corner the wooden chair rail was coming off the wall about three inches in length with paint chipped, and the left closet was missing a door. b. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The right wall had a large indentation in the exposed sheet rock, eight inches long and four inches wide, by the resident's bed. In addition, above and around the indentation the paint was chipped, exposing more sheet rock. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The wall between the closets had a 2 foot long by 4 inch wide discolored brown area with chipped paint. The wall on the right side next to the air…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the janitor closet, the treatment nurse office, and the door to the dirty side of the laundry which contained chemicals were locked to prevent accidental ingestion by the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 18 mobile residents per a list provided by Administrator on 2/1/24. The findings are: 1. On 01/30/24 at 9:43 AM, the Janitors Closet on the right side of East Hall 2 was unlocked. In the left-hand corner of the closet was a wall mounted manual chemical dispenser containing four 80 ounce chemical containers, that were connected to the sink faucet by hoses and flowed into a basin on the floor to be used by housekeeping. From left to the right the chemicals were a no rinse cleaner, containing 40 ounces, an organic acid restroom cleaner, containing 80 ounces, a one-step disinfectant cleaner, containing 80 ounces and a glass cleaner, containing 40 ounces. On the top shelf were two boxes of glass cleaner, three individual plastic containers two were half full and one was full of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) mask, a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mask and oxygen tubing were properly stored in a closed bag or container when not in use to prevent potential cross contamination for 3 (Residents #27, #30, and #32) of 7 (Residents #7, #27, #30, #32, #46, #48 and #258) sampled residents who had a physician's order for BiPAP, CPAP and/or Oxygen use. The findings are: 1. Resident #27 had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Unspecified. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/02/2023 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively impaired). a. On 01/29/24 at 12:39 pm, during initial rounds, a nightstand to the right of Resident #27's bed had a black BiPAP machine with a hose attached to a facial mask. The mask was not properly stored in a bag. A plastic storage bag or container for the mask was not on the top or around the table. b. On 01/30/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted profession principles, as evidenced by the Treatments Nurses office being unlocked and accessible to residents. The findings are: a. On 01/30/24 at 9:58 AM, the Treatment Nurses office was left unlocked. On the top of the two filing cabinets were 3 sixteen ounce plastic bottles of Dakins Solution. In a lower wooden alcove there were various wound care materials with two bottles of Body Bath Oil and a half filled bottle of isopropyl alcohol. b. The Pharmacy Insert for the Dakin's Solution provided by the Nurse Consultant on 01/31/24 at 12:40 PM stated, .Drug Facts . Warnings for external use only .Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away . c. On 01/30/24 at 09:58 AM, the Surveyor asked the Treatment Nurse if her office door was supposed to be locked at all times. The Treatment Nurse said yes. The Surveyor asked what could happen if it was unlocked and left unattended.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR