St. John's Hospital Camarillo D/P SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 73.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 7.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 9.19 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.98 to 1.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a Weight variance of five pounds or more for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 25's) when the weight record was examined and noted that the resident experienced a significant 14 percent weight loss in less than two months. This failure resulted in a delay in the need to alter treatment significantly to Resident 25. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), dated 4/7/25, the AR indicated, Resident 25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (progressive disease that causes muscle weakness and paralysis), Quadriplegia ( paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the neck down), and Ileus (intestine can't push food and waste out of your body). During a review of Resident 25's Weight Record, the weight record indicated, on 2/24/25, Resident 25's weight was recorded as 69 kilograms. The resident refused to be weighed in March, and on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 25 needs not being met. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan, dated 3/2025, the P&P indicated, Discipline providing care, treatment or services to the residents are required to review and contribute to the resident's care plan . the comprehensive person centered care plan will address: the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), dated 4/7/25, the AR indicated, Resident 25 was admitted in Long Term Care (LTC) on 2/24/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (progressive disease that causes muscle weakness and paralysis), quadriplegia ( paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to ensure medication is correctly labelled according to the physician's order and was sent to the pharmacy when medication discrepancy is found for 1 of 3 unsampled residents (Resident 64). This failure had the potential to result in a medication administration error. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's Physician Progress Notes (PPN), dated 4/7/25, the PPN indicated, Resident 64 had a diagnosis of Diabetes (a condition where the body cannot regulate blood sugar properly). Complicated by Retinoplathy (any disease of the retina, the light-sensitive tissue at the back of the eye). During a review of Resident 64's Active Order Profile (AOP), dated 4/4/25, the AOP indicated, Resident 64 is to receive 25 Units (unit of measurement) subcutaneously injection BID. During the medication observation on 4/4/25, at 8:00 a.m. with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 picked up the bottle of Insulin (a medication that helps to process sugar from food to energy) inside the medication cart, and then read the eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating condition when a residue build up was found inside of the ice machine panels. This failure had the potential for residents to Waterborne diseases (illnesses caused by consuming contaminated water). Findings: During a concurrent observation on 04/08/25 at 11:20 a.m. with the kitchen manager (KM), inspection of the ice machine was done and a pink residue and dark streaks of residue was observed in the panels of the ice machine using the white paper towel. The KM acknowledged and stated that there should be no residue found on panels. During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/08/25 at 02:25 p.m. with the Facility Maintenance Director ([NAME]), [NAME] acknowledged residue and stated that the filter needed to be changed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Ice Machine Preventative Maintenance Procedure, undated, the policy and procedure indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for 1 out of 23 sampled residents (Resident 36). When an extension cord with six sockets was mounted on the right upper side rail, approximately 12 inches from Resident 36's head while lying in bed. This failure creates an unsafe environment for the resident. Findings: During an observation on 4/7/26 at 10:09 a.m., in room W222-01, Resident was seen lying in bed with a blue extension cord with six sockets mounted on the right upper side rail, approximately 12 inches from Resident 36's head. Four bulky adapter devices were plugged into the extension cord, and the cord's power indicator light was lit, indicating that it was active. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 11:00 a.m. with Maintenance (MT) in Residents 36's room, MT stated that the blue extension cord is used for medical equipment and not intended for the resident's personal use. MT further stated that no extension cord should be mounted on the side rail, as it poses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) was not exposed to pathogens carried by flies resulting to formation of maggots (the larvae of flies that are typically found in decaying organic matter). Maggots were found in the tracheostomy (an opening in the neck and into the windpipe to help a person breathe) site of the resident . This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for parasitic infection (Myiasis). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s history and Physical (H/P) dated 09/22/21 indicated, an admission date of 09/22/21, with diagnosis that included past medical history (PMH) of coronary artery disease (CAD), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMII) and Depression (symptoms that affect how a person feels, thinks, and handles daily activities) who was initially admitted to Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) Status Post S/P left (Middle Cerebral Artery) (MCA) infarct with resultant expressive Aphasia (Loss of ability to understand or express speech) and Right Hemiplegia (paralysis of the right side of the body after injury to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for further abuse to occur to residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated June 29, 2024, the H&P indicated the following diagnoses: atrial fibrillation (irregular and fast heart rhythm), cancer at base of tongue, metastatic (spreads to other areas) squamous cell carcinoma (cancer that starts on skin surface) to head and neck, palliative care (specialized medical care for people with incurable illness), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (a tube to allow a person to get nutrition through the stomach), trismus (mouth remains tightly closed). During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note (NPN), dated 7/12/24 at 11:00 p.m., the NPN indicated, in part, Patient reported to nurse during rounds that (Resident 1) feels everyone here hates (Resident 1), and (Resident 1) feels (Resident 1) does not deserve to be treated that way, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions within the food service operation when: 1. A nutrition assistant (NA 1) removed dirty gloves after handling dirty dishes, and put on a new pair of gloves, without washing her hands. 2. The high temperature dish machine manufacturer's guidelines were not followed. 3. Posted manufacturer's guidelines for contact time of food service equipment immersed in the sanitizer solution at the three (3) compartment sink was not followed. Failure to ensure proper hand washing and implementing manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning and sanitizing of the dishes had the potential to place five of 70 residents (Residents 52, 58, 61, 1, and 3) who received food from the kitchen at an increased risk of a foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/05/24 at 2:31 p.m. with Nutrition Assistant (NA) 2 in the kitchen, in the presence of the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), NA 2 was wearing gloves while scraping dirty dishes and to move a large garbage bin closer to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) a bruise on the forearm of unknown origin and allegation of abuse for one of one resident (Resident 22).within 2 hours of discovery. This failure had the potential to delay investigation and affect physical and psychosocial well-being of the resident. Findings: On 2/27/24 at 5:30 p.m., CDPH received a facsimile (FAX) letter from Quality Assurance (QA). The letter was to inform CDPH of bruising identified on Resident 22's forearm noted on 2/26/24 at 11:20 p.m. Initial interviews were completed, unable to identify contributing cause to bruising. During a review of Resident 22's Nursing Progress Note, dated 2/26/24, the Nursing Progress Note indicated, . discoloration on her left forearm just below left AC (Antecubital, the space inside the crook of the elbow), . asked her if somebody hit her and she nod yes. During an interview on 3/6/24 at 3:48 p.m. with QA, QA confirmed the mandated report of injury/allegation of abuse was not reported to CDPH within 2 hours of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 72) had an accurate Minimum Data Set ((MDS) a standardized assessment tool designed to identify potential problems). This failure resulted in Resident 72 not having a care plan ((CP) a tool that outlines the interventions (actions) to be taken to meet the resident's needs) developed for their discharge goal of returning home. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission MDS, Section Q, dated 11/14/23, the MDS indicated, neither Resident 72 nor his spouse participated in the assessment and Resident 72's goal was to remain in the facility. During a review of Resident 72's Resident Care Team Meeting, Social Work Review (CTM), dated 11/16/23 at 11:30 a.m., the CTM indicated, Patient is a [AGE] year old, English speaking married male. Patient was transferred from [hospital name] on 11/08/2023 for deconditioning [decreased strength and/or balance] due to sepsis [the body's extreme response to an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA