Providence Care Center
2025 Hayes Avenue, Sandusky, OH 44870 · Non profit - Church related · 138 certified beds · (419) 627-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 43.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 77.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 43.1–55.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 9.1–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 77.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 77.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 72.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.6–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 93.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, hospital record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately and timely assess an acute change in condition (lack of assessments), failed to collaborate with the surgeon and failed to timely recognize significant changes in condition for a post-surgical resident resulting in delayed interventions. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious physical harm, injuries, and/or negative health outcomes on 06/04/26 at 12:02 P.M. when Resident #100 was seen by Vascular Surgeon #250 and the left lower extremity was assessed to have palpable femoral pulses bilaterally with no appreciable flow detected in the distal left lower extremity with no distal pulses palpable, absent sensation over the left foot with preserved sensation at a more proximal level, and clammy skin with mottled discoloration. Resident #100 was diagnosed with a distal superficial femoral artery occlusion (a blockage in the lower third of the thigh's main artery) requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, hospital record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Eliquis (an oral anticoagulant medication used to prevent and treat blood clots) was administered as ordered by the physician. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious physical harm, injuries, and/or negative health outcomes on 06/04/26 at 12:02 P.M. when Resident #100 was seen by Vascular Surgeon #250 and the left lower extremity was assessed to have palpable femoral pulses bilaterally with no appreciable flow detected in the distal left lower extremity with no distal pulses palpable, absent sensation over the left foot with preserved sensation at a more proximal level, and clammy skin with mottled discoloration. Resident #100 was diagnosed with a distal superficial femoral artery occlusion (a blockage in the lower third of the thigh's main artery) requiring an urgent hospital admission for intravenous (IV) heparin therapy (a fast-acting blood thinner used to treat and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure therapy ordered positioning equipment was utilized. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed for positioning and position equipment. The facility census was 97.Findings include:Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/24. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, bladder cancer, and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a mild cognition decline. The resident had no rejection of care and required substantial assistance for all activities of daily living except eating.Review of Resident #39's most recent care plan revealed it was silent regarding positioning.Review of Resident #39's physician orders found no order pertaining to positioning equipment.Review of Resident #39's Physical Therapy Treatment encounter note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure required respiratory treatments were implemented as ordered. This affected one (#39) of two residents identified for requiring continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices. The facility census was 97.Findings include:Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/24. Diagnoses included obstructive sleep apnea, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, bladder cancer, and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a mild cognition decline. The resident had no rejection of care and required substantial assistance for all activities of daily living except eating. The resident was documented as not requiring a non-invasive mechanical ventilator.Review of Resident #39's most recent care plan revealed it was silent regarding the need for a CPAP.Review of Resident #39's physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, review of staff schedules and timekeeping records, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into a resident's allegation of verbal and physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 93. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 11/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, restless leg syndrome, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/20/26, revealed Resident #53's cognition was moderately impaired.Review of SRI 271580, submitted on 03/02/26, revealed Resident #53 revealed an allegation of a staff member speaking unkindly to him to an Ohio Department of Health (ODH) surveyor, who subsequently reported it to Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #231. Resident #53 would not share the staff member's name to the ODH surveyor. LSW #231 spoke to Resident #53…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was accurate when documenting incontinence care being provided to the residents. This affected three (#33, #52, and #90) of three residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 93.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 07/20/22. Diagnoses included stage three chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, polyneuropathy, and adult failure to thrive. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/20/26, revealed Resident #33's cognition was intact. Resident #33 was dependent on staff for toileting, and was frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder.Review of incontinence care documentation for Resident #33 for March 2026 revealed there was no documentation of incontinence care was provided on 03/03/26, 03/07/26, 03/13/26, 03/14/26, 03/21/26, 03/26/26, and 03/31/26.The incontinence care documentation for Resident #33 for April 2026 revealed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to complete wound treatments and failed to complete wound treatments as prescribed by the provider. This affected one resident (#84) of three for wound care completion. The facility census was 98.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 03/23/18. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus, acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (fast bacterial infection of the bone usually caused by a blood stream bacteria lasting less than four weeks), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and need for assistance for personal care. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #84 revealed he was cognitively impaired and had unhealed pressure ulcers. Review of the current physician orders from 02/26 for Resident #84 revealed wound to right ischium, cleanse with vashe cleanser, pat dry, apply honey gel or sheet, alginate, apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing wound care. This affected one resident (#84) observed for wound care. The facility census was 98.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 03/23/18. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus, acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (fast bacterial infection of the bone usually caused by a blood stream bacteria lasting less than four weeks), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and need for assistance for personal care. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #84 revealed he was cognitively impaired and had unhealed pressure ulcers. Observation on 03/02/26 at 10:01 A.M. revealed a sign on the outside of the door of Resident #84's room that alerted all staff to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The signage indicated for all staff and providers that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, review of staff schedules and timekeeping records, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse during the investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse when the alleged perpetrator was allowed to continue to work on the same unit while an investigation was in progress. This had the potential to affect 36 residents (#75, #27, #88, #15, #11, #95, #63, #9, #82, #16, #47, #64, #53, #42, #39, #61, #74, #23, #46, #85, #24, #68, #69, #89, #87, #41, #20, #19, #10, #66, #58, #8, #31, #67, #96, #36) residing the Cedarview unit. The facility census was 97. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 06/07/21. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, osteoarthritis, depression, anxiety, visual hallucinations, and bilateral hearing loss. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, policy review, and review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident change in condition. This affected one (#69) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 97. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 06/07/21. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, osteoarthritis, depression, anxiety, visual hallucinations, and bilateral hearing loss. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had severe cognitive impairment.Review of the SRI submitted on 07/08/25 at 8:41 A.M. revealed on 07/04/25 at 6:00 A.M., Resident #68 indicated Resident #69 stated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 had touched her chest while trying to wake her up to give her medications. Resident #68 stated he had not seen LPN #202 touch Resident #69's chest but he wanted to believe her so he had. Resident #68…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (#69) of three residents reviewed for abuse and one of one SRIs submitted since the annual comprehensive survey. The facility census was 97. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 06/07/21. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, osteoarthritis, depression, anxiety, visual hallucinations, and bilateral hearing loss. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had severe cognitive impairment.Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 02/23/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and type two diabetes mellitus.Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had intact cognition. Review of an SRI submitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and maintenance record review, the facility failed to ensure ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Observation on 05/19/25 at 10:05 A.M. of the large industrial ice machine on the Rosewood unit, with Director of Maintenance (DOM) #600, revealed the inside of the machine had noticeable mold-like built up on the bottom of the machine and other areas throughout the machine. Multiple areas of the machine had large orange, rust-like areas. Concurrent interview with DOM #600 confirmed the findings and stated the ice machine was often used by staff and residents for various uses, such as filling water pitchers. Review of the ice machine maintenance records revealed the machine was last serviced on 02/14/24 and had no upcoming maintenance scheduled.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the dumpster area in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Observation on 05/20/25 at 8:30 A.M. of the outside dumpster area revealed numerous cardboard boxes, gloves, food scraps and six alcoholic beverage cans on the ground, outside of the dumpster. Interview on 05/18/25 at 8:45 A.M. with [NAME] (CK) #257 verified the debris located on the ground, around the dumpster.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain complete documentation of care provided for residents. This affected four (#14, #95, #301, and #35) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/05/18. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), unspecified thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral intervertebral disc disorder, spinal stenosis, hypertension (HTN), major depressive disorder, anxiety, history of falling, unsteadiness on feet, generalized muscle weakness, and respiratory disorder. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident required assistance with hygiene. Review of the facility shower schedule revealed Resident #14 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility infection tracking records, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents met infection criteria prior to the initiation of antibiotics. This affected 27 (#10, #11, #12, #18, #19, #24, #25, #26, #27, #30, #37, #40, #48, #50, #56, #62, #63, #64, #66, #69, #71, #75, #82, #88, #89, #102, and #301) of 27 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the facility infection tracking records from 12/01/25 through 01/31/25 revealed the facility utilized McGeer's (set of clinical and laboratory findings used to assist in identifying infections requiring antibiotic treatment) criteria to determine appropriate antibiotic usage. Further review revealed the following residents were ordered antibiotics without being reviewed to determine whether the McGeer's criteria for antibiotic use was met: • Resident #66, with an admission date of 09/12/23, was ordered ceftriaxone for a bladder infection on 12/02/24. • Resident #10, with an admission date of 10/10/24, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a medication was unavailable for administration. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for physician notification. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/07/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, anemia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/27/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Review of a physician order, dated 10/07/24, revealed Resident #57 had an order for trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (HCl) (used to treat movement problems caused by Parkinson's disease), two milligrams (mg) to be administered orally (PO) two times per day. Observation on 05/19/25 at 7:00 A.M. of medication administration with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure bedding was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one (#16) resident reviewed for soiled bedding. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/01/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/21/25, revealed Resident #16 was mildly cognitively impaired and required supervision for bathing. Observation on 05/18/25 at 10:30 A.M. of Resident #16's bedding revealed several light brown streaks on the fitted sheet of the bed and a dark brown spot on the bed pad. Concurrent interview with Resident #16 revealed her sheets had not been changed in a while and stated they were dirty. Observation on 05/19/25 at 9:40 A.M. of Resident #16's bedding revealed the sheets remained with the same brown streaks on the fitted sheet. Concurrent interview with Resident #16 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure valid indications for the use of mobility restricting devices. This affected two (#3 and #56) of two residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypothyroidism and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/04/25, revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision for completing activities of daily living (ADLs) and exhibited no wandering behaviors. Further review of the MDS assessments since Resident #3's admission to the facility revealed the resident was never identified as having any wandering behaviors. Review of the Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 04/04/25, revealed Resident #3 had no history of elopement in the last six months and was identified as not being an elopement risk. Review of the care plan, dated 06/01/22, revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for behaviors, adverse effects, and efficacy. This affected one (#15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/21/25, revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care, revised 03/08/24, revealed Resident #15 used psychotropic medications. Interventions included administering medications as ordered and monitoring for side effects and effectiveness, and monitoring and reporting as needed side effects and adverse reactions of medication. Review of Resident #15's active physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order for buspirone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete timely Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments following a significant change. This affected one (#91) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility identified five residents receiving hospice services. The facility census was 96 Findings include: Review of Resident #91's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included dementia, insomnia and neck fracture. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/13/25, revealed Resident #91 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS did not indicate Resident #91 received hospice services. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 04/29/25 to consult a local hospice provider for potential admission for Resident #91. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 elected hospice services on 05/01/25, with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. Additional review of the MDS assessments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents care plans were an accurate representation of current resident conditions This affected two (#3 and #56) of two residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypothyroidism and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/04/25, revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision for completing activities of daily living (ADLs) and exhibited no wandering behaviors. Further review of the MDS assessments since Resident #3's admission to the facility revealed the resident was never identified as having any wandering behaviors. Review of the Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 04/04/25, revealed Resident #3 had no history of elopement in the last six months and was identified as not being an elopement risk. Review of the care plan dated 06/01/22 revealed Resident #3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistance with oral hygiene. This affected one (#89) of one resident reviewed for oral hygiene. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, hypertension (TN), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), glaucoma, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact. The resident required supervision/touching assistance for oral hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 10/21/24 revealed Resident #89 had an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit. Interventions included providing all necessary equipment to complete oral care and setting up and assisting as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/21/25, revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care, dated 08/28/18, revealed Resident #15 was at risk for constipation related to decreased mobility and medication side effects. Interventions included following the facility bowel protocol for bowel management and recording bowel movement pattern. Review of Resident #15's active physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order dated 04/17/25 for Oxycodone (opioid medication) five milligram (mg) oral capsule, give one capsule by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record from 04/17/25 through 05/19/25 revealed Resident #15 received Oxycodone on 11 occasions. Review of Resident #15's bowel tracking record from 04/21/25 through 05/19/25 revealed there were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of optometry (vision) notes, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine eye care timely. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for vision care. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/13/23. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus (DM2), hepatic encephalopathy, dysphagia, need for assistance with personal care, respiratory disorders, hypertension (HTN), depression, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/09/25, revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of an optometry note, dated 11/13/23, revealed Resident #35 was seen by the optometrist for an examination (exam). The resident had complaints of blurred vision in both eyes, which was getting worse. New eyeglasses were ordered. Further review revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents identified to smoke were assessed for safety. This affected one (#68) of one resident resident identified by the facility as a smoker. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, depression, hypertension, and difficulty in walking. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/01/25, revealed Resident #68 was cognitively intact. The resident required partial/moderate assistance from staff when wheeling 50 or 150 feet once seated in their wheelchair. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/11/24, revealed Resident #68 was a daily smoker, had been informed of the facility non-smoking status, and would abide by smoking off of facility property at all times. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, panic disorder, seizures, schizophrenia, anxiety, migraine, low back pain, pain in the right leg, and pain in the right hip. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 03/31/25, revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact. Review of the active physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order dated 05/14/25 for Vancomycin (antibiotic medication) intravenous (IV) solution 1250 milligrams/250 milliliters (mg/ml), use 1250 ml IV one time per day for cellulitis for 10 days. The scheduled time for the medication to be administered was 9:00 A.M. Observation on 05/20/25 at 12:12 P.M. revealed Resident #30 was sitting up on the side of their bed. The resident was receiving Vancomycin IV via a midline catheter at the time of observation. A pole located next to the resident's bed contained a pump with medication administration settings. A bag containing fluid/medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or family regarding need to discontinue a seizure medication. This affected one (#107) of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Review of Resident #107's medical record for Resident #107 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 and a discharge date of 08/31/24. Diagnoses for Resident #107 included hypertensive urgency, urinary tract infection (UTI), schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, osteoarthritis, heart failure, seizures, pneumonia, vascular dementia, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), and seizures. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #107 is cognitively intact. Review of the August 2024 monthly physician orders revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of medical record, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies and procedures were followed for maintaining urinary catheter bags. This affected two (#50 and #87) of three residents reviewed for urinary incontinence. The facility census was 106. Findings include: 1.) Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/11/24, with diagnoses of multiple subsegmental thrombotic pulmonary emboli without acute cor pulmonale, depressive disorder, failure to thrive, hypokalemia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness, need for assistance with personal care, obstructive and reflux uropathy, anemia, syncope and collapse, other specified disorders of the male genital organs, Vitamin D deficiency, Vitamin B12 deficiency, and Barrett's esophagus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 08/13/24, for Resident #50 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident #50 is cognitively intact. Observation on 09/25/24 at 11:27 A.M., revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, review of the policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when performing high-risk resident care activities for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). In addition, the facility failed to implement EBP per physician order for Resident #87. This affected four (#37, #77, #87, and #95) of 25 residents identified on EBP. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy, respiratory disorders, lack of coordination, asthma, hyperlipidemia, retention of urine, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/10/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's request to have a positioning side rail on her bed, to promote the resident's ability to assist with bed mobility. This affected one (#87) of 23 sampled residents for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/20/22, with medical diagnoses including: breast cancer with bone metastasis, muscle weakness, anxiety, and pain. Review of the most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #87 is cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility. Review of Resident #87's written plan of care for activities of daily living (ADL's) identified under the section of bed mobility encourage me and assist with repositioning in bed. The plan identified I use rails to reposition and turn in bed. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) when a resident received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. This affected one (#71) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of PASARR results dated 08/02/23, revealed Resident #71 had no indications of serious mental illness. Record review revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and dementia. Review of physician notes dated 08/10/23 revealed Resident #71 had a family history of schizoaffective disorder. Further review of the medical record revealed a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder was added for Resident #71 on 08/14/21. Review of the electronic and paper medical records revealed no evidence a new PASARR was completed when Resident #71 had a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Interview on 10/04/23 at 11:57 A.M., with Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a daily dressing was completed for a diabetic ulcer. This affected one (#95) of two residents reviewed for skin ulcers. The facility census 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/22, with medical diagnoses including: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with foot ulcers, severe peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and hypertension. Review of the most recent [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #95 was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. The assessment revealed Resident #95 is identified with one diabetic ulcer to the outer right foot. Review of physician orders dated 09/01/23 revealed an order for the right outer foot wound to clean ulcer with Vashe (wound solution), apply Santyl and a dry dressing daily on day shift. Interview on 10/02/23 at 9:49 A.M., with Resident #95 stated the staff did not change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a daily dressing was completed for a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#95) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/22, with medical diagnoses including: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with foot ulcers, severe peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and hypertension. Review of the most recent [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #95 was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. The assessment revealed Resident #95 is identified with one stage 4 (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone in the ulcer) wound to the left heel. Review of physician orders dated 09/01/23 revealed an order for the left heel pressure ulcer wound to clean ulcer with Vashe (wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a suprapubic catheter was positioned to allow urine to freely flow. This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, hyperlipidemia, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, bladder-neck obstruction, urethral diverticulum, contracture of left hand, and hemiplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/08/23, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #77's current plan of care, dated 03/06/23, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected three (#31, #48, and #87) of 21 residents on the Cederview hallway. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/17, with medical diagnoses including: chronic kidney disease (CKD), major depression, anemia, delusional disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, chronic pain, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #31's Medication Administration records (MAR) dated 10/02/23, for medications scheduled upon rising, included Cymbalta 60 milligram (mg), Gabapentin 400 mg and Oxcarbazepine 600 mg, contained no evidence of initials listed to indicate Resident #31's medications were administered. Interview on 10/02/23 at 8:11 A.M., with Resident #31 stated she did not receive any of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of facility self-reported incidents, review of controlled substances signs out sheets, review of policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent diversion of residents narcotic medications. This potentially affected 31 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #9, #10, #12, #16, #20, #22, #25, #32, #35, #37, #41, #44, #50, #52, #57, #58, #66, #67, #83, #85, #90, #93, #101, #105, #110, #111 and #112) who resided on the Rosewood unit. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI) #237089, #237081, #237080, and #237077, were all dated [DATE], the reports indicated the facility identified concerns regarding potential diversion of narcotic medications. During the facility investigation, additional concerns were identified. Review of the controlled drug administration records for 31 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #9, #10, #12,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to wear hairnets in the kitchen, serve residents lunch in a sanitary manner and use proper hand hygiene when preparing foods. This had the potential to affect 109 of 109 residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen. Resident #62, identified by facility, had an order for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/21/20 at 8:50 A.M., during the initial tour of the kitchen, revealed three staff in the kitchen, including Dietary Manger #136. None of the staff were observed wearing hairnets. Observation on 06/21/21 at 8:55 A.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #129 revealed DA #129 was not wearing a hairnet. DA #129 had her hair pulled up, with loose strands of hair hanging. DA #129 was scooping butterscotch pudding into serving dishes. Interview at the time of the observation with the DM #136, verified the staff, including herself, were not wearing hairnets. DM #136 stated the air conditioning was out in the kitchen and she had told staff they did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and effective manner. This had the potential to affect 31 (#14, #37, #40, #41, #43, #44, #50, #67, #68, #69, #72, #73, #74, #88, #91, #94, #99, #100, #101, #104, #109, #262, #362, #363, #364, #365, #366, #367, #368, #400 and #401) residents who receive medications in a total facility census of 110. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 8:17 A.M., of the medication cart in the Rosewood Lane hallway revealed medications that were expired included Tylenol liquid (pain reliever/fever reducer) 160 milligram (mg) per five milliliter (ml) expired 06/2020, and Melatonin (sleep aide) three mg tablets expired 01/2021. Interview on [DATE] at 8:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #176, verified one bottle of Tylenol liquid 160 milligram (mg) per five milliliter (ml) expired 06/2020, and one bottle of Melatonin three mg tablets expired 01/2021. Observation on [DATE] at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for donning and doffing personal protective equipment (PPE). This affected 30 (#14, #37, #40, #41, #43, #44, #67, #68, #69, #72, #73, #74, #88, #91, #94, #99, #100, #101, #104, #109, #262, #362, #363, #364, #365, #366, #367, #368, #400 and #401) of 30 residents who reside on the Rosewood Lane hallway. In addition, the facility failed to properly disinfect a glucometer. This affected four (#67, #100, #262 and #365) residents who utilize the glucometer machine on the Rosewood Lane hallway. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an admission date of 06/06/21, with an original admission date of 05/18/21. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diastolic heart failure, chronic gout and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to apply Thrombo-Embolus Deterrent (TED) hose/compression stockings as ordered by the physician for a resident with edema. This affected one (#56) of one resident reviewed for edema. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; contracture, right hand; dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified (COPD); contracture, right ankle; and Type II diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired and required total dependence, two-person assistance with bed mobility and transfers and extensive two-person assistance with dressing. Review of a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide treatments for a Stage IV pressure ulcer as ordered by the physician for one resident. This affected one (#62) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/20/20 and a readmission date of 02/03/21. Diagnoses included other specified disorders of brain; pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage IV; hypertensive heart disease with heart failure; mixed receptive-expressive language disorder; contracture of left hand; and bladder-neck obstruction. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive two-person physical assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and had a Stage IV pressure ulcer. Review of the plan of care revealed Resident #62 was at risk for skin breakdown due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to apply a Prafo boot as care planned for one resident to prevent a decline of the contracture. This affected one (#56) of three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; contracture, right hand; dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified (COPD); contracture, right ankle; and Type II diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired and required total dependence, two-person assistance with bed mobility and transfers and extensive two-person assistance with dressing. Review of the plan of care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of hospital discharge documents, review of the fall investigation and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of two assist to prevent a fall. This affected one (#56) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; contracture, right hand; dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified (COPD); contracture, right ankle; and Type II diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired and required total dependence, two-person assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Additional review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI LIVING COMMUNITIES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/10/2017 |
| COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2014 |
| LIPSEY, PRENTICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| MBANU, TERIKA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/05/2024 |
| MELFI, MITCH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/23/2016 |
| CECIL, CAITLIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/18/2012 |
| FINN, CHRISTINA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| GRUBBS, STACEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/06/2012 |
| HAZARD, TED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2017 |
| MUNROE, KYLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2015 |
| MURRIEL, SHELLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| NAGEL, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/12/2015 |
| SNODGRASS, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2016 |
| WINE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| IFFLAND, ALISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2017 |
| REHMER, HEATHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2024 |
| CONCEPT REHAB, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2015 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| ICP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| OHIO NEWSPAPERS, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| PRELUDE SYSTEMS, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| ULRICHPINCIOTTI DESIGN GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2011 |
| BASINGER, PAULINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/07/2024 |
| BUNTING, DARRIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| DAY, DENICE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| FELDER, SHIRLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/18/2006 |
| FOX, AMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/08/2000 |
| HOWARD, CASEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| LIND, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/29/2014 |
| LONGHIN-HOWARD, JOAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2007 |
| MCFARLAND, DIANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2023 |
| RIFFLE, RAMONDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/05/2022 |
| VALLIANT, MARCELINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/23/2024 |
| VOELKER, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| WALLEN, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/08/2020 |
| RICHTER AND ASSOCIATES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| SYLVANIA FRANCISCAN HEALTH | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2014 |
| LUCAS, GINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2024 |
| STIDHAM, KATHRYN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 78 rows in the source record cover these 40 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $823K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365976. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.