St Leonard Hcc
8100 Clyo Road, Centerville, OH 45458 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (937) 436-6340 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $89,700 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-18)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 16.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 296 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 139 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.7%CMS range 45.5–56.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 8.0–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.8–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 124.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, review of the information from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely treatments and interventions were done for a resident's pressure ulcer. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #95's pressure ulcer to his left heel deteriorated in condition and developed osteomyelitis from the delay in treatment. This affected one (Resident #95) of two residents reviewed for pressure wounds. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 08/31/23. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, peripheral vascular disease, and pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #95 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #95 was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing and transfers and required substantial assistance from staff for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions and treatment orders were in place for a resident admitted to the facility with a stage three pressure ulcer to the coccyx. This resulted in the Actual Harm when Resident #10's stage three pressure ulcer, present upon admission, did not receive timely treatment and there was deterioration of the pressure ulcer to a stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) pressure ulcer. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure skin assessments were completed as ordered for Resident #14 who was at risk for pressure ulcer development and who developed an unavoidable pressure ulcer, this placed the resident at potential risk for more than minimal harm for Resident #14. This affected two (#10 and #14) of four residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 113. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-01-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility pain policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an unstageable pressure ulcer received pain medication prior to or during a treatment. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #89 who complained of pain during a pressure ulcer treatment. This affected one Resident (#89) of two reviewed for pain. The census was 145. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, history of falls, and renal insufficiency. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 01/15/19 revealed the resident was at risk for developing pain. Interventions included to monitor non-verbal gestures and or facial expressions related to pain. Further review of the care plan for unstageable pressure ulcer to left proximal buttock revealed to manage the pain associated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received bathing services as scheduled. This affected four (Residents #7, #56, #114, and #130) of five residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 124 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/19/25 with diagnoses including myelodysplastic syndrome, hypokalemia, and iron deficiency anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7 dated 02/10/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including bathing and dressing. Review of the care plan for Resident #7 dated 02/11/26 revealed the staff would meet the resident's ADL needs and the resident was fully dependent on staff to provide baths. Review of the shower documentation for Resident #7 revealed she had scheduled showers on Monday and Thursday evenings. Further review of the shower documentation dated 01/01/26 to 04/01/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility (self-reported incident), observations, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was assessed as being at risk for elopements did not elope from the facility. This affected one (#205) out of three residents reviewed for elopement risk. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of Resident #205's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's disease, dementia and traumatic brain injury. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #205 was severely cognitively impaired, required moderate assistance with dressing, toileting and bathing. Review of Resident #205's care plan dated 06/29/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls, self-care performance deficit and elopement. Interventions included Resident #205 to be one on one with someone. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered to be free from errors not five (5) percent (%) or greater. There were two medication errors observed out of 27 opportunities for a medication error rate of 7.41%, This affected two (#66 and #71) of two residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 110. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact. Review of a physician order dated 04/25/25 revealed Resident #71 was ordered supplemental calcium 600 milligrams (mg) to be given once daily. Observation on 05/28/25 at 6:40 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #270 revealed the nurse was administering medication to Resident #71. At the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of electronic mail (email) documents, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected two (#112 and #113) of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 110. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #112's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/25. Diagnoses included depression, hyperkalemia, fluid overload, thrombocytopenia, peripheral vascular disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute diastolic heart failure, and congestive heart failure. The resident was discharged on 04/24/25. Review of Resident #112's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/20/25 for the diuretic furosemide 20 milligrams (mg) with instructions to take two tablets by mouth once a day for hypertension. This order was discontinued on 04/24/25. Review of Resident #112's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/21/25 for furosemide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of laboratory results, review of a facsimile (fax) document, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of critical laboratory values in a timely manner. This affected one (#112) of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 110. Findings Included: Review of Resident #112's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included depression, hyperkalemia, fluid overload, thrombocytopenia, peripheral vascular disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute diastolic heart failure, and congestive heart failure. The resident was discharged on 04/24/25. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #112 had intact cognition, required setup for meals, and required substantial maximal assistance for bathing, personal hygiene, dressing the lower body, and placing shoes on and off the feet. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify family/Power of Attorney (POA) of an appointment scheduled for the resident and the facility sent the resident, who has Alzheimer's disease, to the appointment alone. This affected one (Resident #110) of three residents reviewed for appointments. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance and Alzheimer's disease with early onset. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #110 had severe cognition impairment. Resident #110 required supervision assistance from with ambulation. Resident #110 required substantial assistance from staff with toileting and transfers. Review of the hospital's Discharge Instructions dated 07/22/24 revealed an order stating: Follow-up with spine surgery in the clinic. Call to make an appointment. Resident #110 needs to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan included a vision and hearing plan for Resident #107 and a indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #95. This affected two (Resident #95 and #107) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #107 revealed admission date of 04/03/24. Diagnoses included macular degeneration of the right eye and hearing loss, unspecified ear. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #107 had impaired cognition. His vision was documented as impaired, and his hearing was documented as adequate. Review of Resident #107's care plan revealed there was no documentation of a hearing or vision concern. Interview on 07/15/24 at 11:44 A.M. with Resident #107 revealed he did have an issue with his hearing, and he was blind in his right eye. Interview on 07/18/24 at 2:08 P.M. with MDS Nurse #214…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were timely added to the care plan. This affected one (#66) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 01/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, congestive heart failure, anxiety disease, chronic kidney disease, delusional disorders, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) note dated 07/10/24 revealed Resident #66 had a fall on 06/17/24 in her room and was found in front of her wheelchair. The new intervention was to place Dycem in the wheelchair. The IDT note dated 07/11/24 revealed Resident #66 had a fall on 06/21/24 in her room and was found near her bed. The new intervention was a fall mat to the side of the bed. Review of the plan of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician treatment orders were followed and implemented timely for the residents. This affected two (Residents #60 and #108) of two residents reviewed for un-pressure related skin conditions. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed admission date of 06/12/24. Diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis and vascular dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had significantly impaired cognition. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #60 had skin breakdown due to right hip surgical incision. Interventions included to administer treatments as ordered and for enhanced barrier precautions. Review of the physician orders dated 06/18/24 revealed an order to cleanse the right hip surgical site with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen administration were followed. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/15/15. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living, and utilized oxygen therapy. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #7 has oxygen therapy related to COPD, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea, congestive heart failure, and morbid obesity. Intervention included providing oxygen as ordered. Review of Resident #7's physician order dated 07/18/23 revealed an order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to schedule dental services for teeth extractions per physician orders for a resident. This affected one (Resident# 54) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 09/17/17 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with oral hygiene. Resident #7 did not have broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures and did not have mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. Review of the physician orders dated 12/14/23 revealed an order for Resident #54 to have order to extract broken teeth and root tips. The resident was planned for upper complete denture and lower partial. Resident #54 would like to keep tooth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/27/22 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Artificial Tears one drop in each eye daily. Observation on 07/17/24 at 8:46 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #110 administered Resident #26's Artificial Tears one drop in each eye without wearing gloves. Interview on 07/17/24 at 8:54 A.M. with LPN #110 confirmed she did not use gloves to administer Resident #26's Artificial Tears one drop in each eye. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for Resident #60 and the facility failed to ensure gloves were worn when administering eye drops for Resident #26. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumococcal immunizations were offered to residents. This affected four (#19, #51, #66, and #74) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/27/24. Diagnoses included other sequela of cerebral infarction and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence that the facility offered the pneumococcal immunization or provided education to the resident or resident representative. Interview on 07/18/24 at 1:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified the lack of immunization documentation for Resident #19. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 09/15/21. Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 immunizations were offered to residents. This affected three (#19, #66, and #74) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/27/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence that the facility offered the COVID-19 vaccine or provided education to the resident or resident representative. Interview on 07/18/24 at 1:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified the lack of immunization documentation for Resident #19. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 01/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to act in a timely manner to protect residents from abuse. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/31/24. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, dysphagia, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the progress note dated 02/24/24 at 6:23 P.M. revealed staff heard screaming from the hallway. Upon entering Resident #10's room, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #122 and State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #103 observed the resident's daughter forcing food into Resident #10's mouth. The daughter stated she was wiping blood from the resident's mouth. The nurse assessed, but could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/31/24. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, dysphagia, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the progress note dated 02/24/24 at 6:23 P.M. revealed staff heard screaming from the hallway. Upon entering Resident #10's room, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #122 and State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #103 observed the resident's daughter forcing food into Resident #10's mouth. The daughter stated she was wiping blood from the resident's mouth. The nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/31/24. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, dysphagia, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the progress note dated 02/24/24 at 6:23 P.M. revealed staff heard screaming from the hallway. Upon entering Resident #10's room, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #122 and State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #103 observed the resident's daughter forcing food into Resident #10's mouth. The daughter stated she was wiping blood from the resident's mouth. The nurse assessed, but could not locate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents colostomy care was completed as ordered. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 09/28/23. Diagnoses include right tibia fracture, diabetes mellitus type two, colostomy, reflux, depression, anxiety and alcohol induced pancreatitis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #10 was independent for eating, dependent for toileting, transfers were not attempted. Documentation revealed Resident #10 had an indwelling catheter and ostomy present. Record review of the physician orders revealed orders to apply skin barrier to surrounding skin as a protectant with no start date. A second order to gently clean the stoma with soap and water and to change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received written documentation explaining the reason for transfers to hospital at the time of transfer. This affected two residents (#112 and #119) of two residents reviewed for hospital transfer requirements. The facility census was 123. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #112 revealed an admission on [DATE] with a discharge on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses that include high blood pressure, stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, epilepsy, kidney failure, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, anxiety, obesity, and history of falls. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was assessed as rarely or never understood. Verbal behaviors were coded one to three days for verbal behaviors directed at others and behaviors not directed at others. Resident #112 requires extensive assist for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to provide written notification to the resident or resident's representative of their bed hold policy. This affected one (#119) of four reviewed for bed holds. The census was 123. Findings include: Review of the closed record review for Resident #119 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 05/02/21. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, history of falling, osteoarthritis, pulmonary fibrosis, disorientation, anxiety, anemia, cataract extraction status right eye, acquired absence of both cervix and uterus, and hypertension. Review of the nursing note, dated 05/01/21 at 9:30 P.M., revealed the resident was transferred to the emergency department of the hospital. Further review of the record revealed there were no notices of the bed hold policy in the resident's charts and the resident was responsible for herself. Interview on 06/02/21 at 11:53 A.M., revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and review of the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessments were accurate. This affected two (#48 and #16) of 24 residents assessments reviewed for accuracy. The facility census was 123. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date on 02/17/21 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemaplegia, hemaparesis, cerebral infarction affecting the right side, weakness, dysphagia, mixed receptive expressive language disorder, aphasia, facial weakness, umbilical hernia, ventral hernia, hypertensive heart disease, falls, history of urinary tract infections, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic bronchitis, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, atrial septal defect, cardiac murmur, depressive disorder, osteoporosis, knee joint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This affected two (#33, and #119) of four residents reviewed for new admission. The census was 123. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dizziness and giddiness, age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, Alzheimer's Disease and muscle weakness. Further review revealed Resident #33 did not have a baseline care plan implemented. 2. Review closed record review for Resident #119 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, history of falling, osteoarthritis, pulmonary fibrosis, disorientation, anxiety, anemia, cataract extraction status right eye, acquired absence of both cervix and uterus, and hypertension. Further review revealed Resident #119 did not have a baseline care plan implemented. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/02/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to initiate comprehensive care plans for residents. This affected two (#48 and #66) of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 123. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date on 02/17/21 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemaplegia, hemaparesis, cerebral infarction affecting the right side, weakness, dysphagia, mixed receptive expressive language disorder, aphasia, facial weakness, umbilical hernia, ventral hernia, hypertensive heart disease, falls, history of urinary tract infections, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic bronchitis, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, atrial septal defect, cardiac murmur, depressive disorder, osteoporosis, knee joint replacement, atrial septal defect, heart valve replacement, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and hyperglycemia. Review of the 5-day Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed no diagnoses for and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff, resident family member and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to include residents in initial and quarterly care conferences when planning the residents care. This affected three (#55, #66, and #75) of five sampled residents for care planning. The facility census was 123. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/31/21 and a re-admission date of 04/27/21, with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the prostate with malignant neoplasm of the bone, difficulty walking, pathological fractures of the right humrerous and left femur, weakness, bacterial pneumonia, pain, type two diabetes, obesity, anemia, disorders of the adrenal gland, acute kidney failure, hyperlipidemia, and a history of polymyelitis. Review of the Medicare -5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was assessment as cognitive intact with no cognitive issues and no mood or behavior issues. Resident #66…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the use of an indwelling Foley catheter and a supporting diagnosis. This affected one (#48) of 24 sampled residents. The facility identified seven residents with indwelling Foley catheters. The facility census was 123. Findings included: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date on 02/17/21 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemaplegia, hemaparesis, cerebral infarction affecting the right side, weakness, dysphagia, mixed receptive expressive language disorder, aphasia, facial weakness, umbilical hernia, ventral hernia, hypertensive heart disease, falls, history of urinary tract infections, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic bronchitis, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, atrial septal defect, cardiac murmur, depressive disorder, osteoporosis, knee joint replacement, atrial septal defect, heart valve replacement, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychoactive medications were being adequately monitored for adverse side effects. This affected two (#16 and #75) of five reviewed for psychoactive medication usage. The facility census was 123. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #16 revealed an admission date on 06/12/15 with diagnoses including unspecified intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy, high blood pressure, anxiety, hypotension, dental caries, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, hearing loss, repeated falls, long term drug therapy and personal history of infectious and parasitic disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #16 revealed resident was coded as rarely or never understood. No behaviors were assessed during the look back period. Resident #16 requires supervision for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Eating was coded as extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-01-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and sampling of a food test tray, review of resident council minutes and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure the food was palatable and was served at the correct temperature. This affected 143 residents out of 145. The facility identified two Residents (#34 and #128) who ate nothing by mouth. The census was 145. Findings include: Observation of a lunch test tray on 01/30/19 at 12:32 P.M. revealed a grilled ham and cheese, a mix of zucchini and squash, beef and noodle soup, orange juice and 2% milk were being served. The temperatures taken by Dietary Supervisor (DS) #397, with his thermometer, the revealed orange juice was 57 degrees, the 2% milk was 48 degrees. When DS #397 took the temperature of the grilled cheese he lifted the sandwich with his left ungloved hand. Sampling of the above test tray on 01/30/19 at 12:34 P.M. revealed the orange juice and milk were warm. The grilled ham and cheese was limp and soggy. Interview with DS #397 on 01/30/19 at 12:40 P.M. agreed the grilled ham and cheese was limp and soggy. He also agreed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen had expiration dates on them, failed to date items that were opened, failed to discard items that were opened and out of date, failed to change gloves in between handling food and dirty surfaces and failed to wash hands between change of gloves. This had the potential to affect 143 resident of a census of 145. The facility identified two Resident's (#34 and #128) who could have nothing by mouth. Findings include: 1. An observation of the servery kitchen conducted in the facility on 01/28/19 at 9:18 A.M. revealed the following items did not have an expiration date on them: two cases of sugar free syrup 1.1 ounce one case of regular syrup 2.1 ounce one case of peanut butter two cases of assorted jelly one case of sugar free jelly half a case of ketchup 1.0 ounce packets one case of ranch packets 1.1 ounce one case of tarter sauce 1 ounce packets one case mayonnaise 1 ounce packets one case of seafood sauce 2.1 ounce packets one half case parmesan cheese 1.5 ounce packets one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-31 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and review of facility policy the facility failed to encode the Minimum Data Set (MDS) within the correct time frames. This affected four Residents (#27, #98, #107 and #345) of six reviewed for correct completion timing. The facility census was 145. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included infection of right arm, need for assistance with personal care, heart failure, lung cancer, enlarged lymph nodes, diabetes, kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, pain syndrome. depression, cancer of the breast, and history of falls. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any cognitive impairment. Resident #27 required limited assist with bed mobility, transfers, bathing and personal hygiene. She required supervision with eating. Review of Section K of the MDS, revealed the signed completion date was 01/30/19 at 5:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview the facility failed to complete and implement person-centered comprehensive plans of care. This affected four Residents (#27, #52, #98, and #345) of six reviewed for patient centered care plans. The facility was 145. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included cellulitis of right arm, difficulty in walking, need for assist with personal care, hypertensive heart disease, kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, depression, hypothyroid disorder, overactive bladder, constipation, history of breast cancer, and diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated of 01/21/19, revealed Resident #27 was not cognitively impaired. Review of Section F (interview for activity preferences) revealed Resident #27 indicated it was very important that she have music to listen to, participate in religious services and to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure activities were provided according to resident interest for three (#27, #98 and #345) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 145. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included cellulitis of right arm, difficulty in walking, need for assist with personal care, hypertensive heart disease, kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, depression, hypothyroid disorder, overactive bladder, constipation, history of breast cancer, and diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated of 01/21/19, revealed Resident #27 was not cognitively impaired. Review of Section F (interview for activity preferences) revealed Resident #27 indicated it was very important that she have music to listen to, participate in religious service and to do her favorite activities while in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident's family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician order to document urinary output from an indwelling catheter was followed. This affected one Resident (#35) of two reviewed for urinary catheter. The census was 145. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included heart failure and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was severely cognitively impaired. Functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and eating. She was coded for an indwelling catheter. Review of physician order dated 11/01/18 revealed to measure urine output every shift. Review of care plan for Resident #35 revealed the resident had an indwelling Foley catheter related to comfort care and the intervention was to record Foley output every shift. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) from 11/01/18 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for residents who sustained falls with injuries. This affected two Residents (#17 and #71) of six reviewed for accidents. The census was 145. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, cerebral palsy, and aphasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact. Functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. Review of care plan dated 07/14/17 revealed Resident #17's was at risk for falls. Interventions were to place a fall mat to bedside and have call light within reach. Review of progress notes dated on 12/29/18 revealed the resident had a fall and sustained a questionable fracture to the right medial malleolus and was sent out to the hospital. Observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted before an as needed pain medication was administered. This affected one Resident (#71) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 145. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #71 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis, and pain in left hip. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively impaired. He was coded for an extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and for toilet use. He was also coded for impairment on one side for lower extremity. Review of care plan for Resident #71 revealed he was at risk for experiencing pain in the left hip. The interventions were to provide non medication interventions for pain like hot packs, cold packs, soothing touch, rest periods and re-positioning. Review of physician orders (PO) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure to document an assessment for pain and a treatment for a pressure ulcer. This affected one Resident (#89) of two reviewed for pain. The census was 145. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, history of falls, and renal insufficiency. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact. Functional status was an extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, toileting and supervision for eating. Observation of wound care on 01/30/19 at 11:35 P.M. was completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #321. Interview with LPN #321 on 01/30/19 at 11:50 A.M. revealed she asked Resident #89 if he needed any pain medication 30 minutes before the treatment and she said he refused. Review of the pain assessment on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), wound care in the progress notes and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-06-10 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and review of the local post office business hours, the facility failed to ensure residents would receive mail on Saturdays, that was delivered to the facility by the post office. This affected 10 (#317, #28, #53, #15, #35, #77, #55, #3, #39 #57) of 10 residents interviewed during resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 123 residents in the facility. Facility census was 123. Findings include: Interview, during resident council meeting, on 05/27/21 at 3:00 P.M., revealed Residents (#317, #28, #53, #15, #35, #77, #55, #3, #39 #57) stated that no mail is delivered on Saturdays due to staff that retrieved the mail from the main building is not here on Saturdays. Interview with the Activity Director #10 on 06/01/21 at 12:04 P.M., stated her staff will deliver the mail on Saturdays, if it is brought down from the main building. The staff member responsible for that is not here on Saturday's, so it is usually not delivered until Monday. Interview with Maintenance Staff #501 on 06/03/21 at 10:45 A.M., stated he does deliver the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$89,700 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $46,780 — penalty dated 2024-07-18
- $42,920 — penalty dated 2023-10-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-15 for 27 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-09 for 33 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI LIVING COMMUNITIES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2014 |
| COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2014 |
| SYLVANIA FRANCISCAN HEALTH | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2014 |
| LIPSEY, PRENTICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| MBANU, TERIKA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/05/2024 |
| MELFI, MITCH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/23/2016 |
| CECIL, CAITLIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/18/2012 |
| FINN, CHRISTINA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| GRUBBS, STACEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2012 |
| HAZARD, TED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2017 |
| MUNROE, KYLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2015 |
| MURRIEL, SHELLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| NAGEL, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/12/2015 |
| SNODGRASS, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2016 |
| WINE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| IFFLAND, ALISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2017 |
| REHMER, HEATHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/25/2024 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| OHIO NEWSPAPERS, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| PRELUDE SYSTEMS, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| RICHTER AND ASSOCIATES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| SKILLED CARE PHARMACY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| ULRICHPINCIOTTI DESIGN GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| ANGELO, FRANCES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/29/2018 |
| BARNEY, KELSEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/06/2023 |
| CRUM, RICKEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/18/2011 |
| DRESSMAN, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/15/2025 |
| HOUSTON, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/14/2016 |
| HOWARD, CASEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| JOST, ANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/02/2024 |
| LANCE, KELLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/29/2011 |
| LONGHIN-HOWARD, JOAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2007 |
| MATTHEWS, ROCKY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/10/2024 |
| MCFARLAND, DIANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2023 |
| OVERMAN, IRINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| ROCK, SEBASTIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2024 |
| ROSE, MIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/18/2016 |
| VAN DOREN, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/06/2024 |
| VASILIU, ANTON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2024 |
| CONCEPT REHAB, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2015 |
| BARTA, ELIZABETH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2018 |
| LUCAS, GINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2024 |
| VOELKER, JENNIFER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 84 rows in the source record cover these 44 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365714. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.