No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Clare Commons

12469 Five Point Road, Perrysburg, OH 43551 · Non profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (419) 931-0050 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 931-0050 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)1 actual-harm citation$40,433 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $40,433 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7045 Lighthouse Way · (419) 873-6836 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
580 Craig Dr Ste 12 · (419) 873-9100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13003 Eckel Junctio Rd · (567) 331-8002 · Call to confirm hours
Park
26350 Fort Meigs Rd · (419) 872-8020 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
24250 N Dixie Hwy · (419) 874-6502

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.8%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.0%12.9%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.7%CMS range 43.0–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.9–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.2–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
1.35
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
50.8%
Total nursing turnover
73.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to determine potential hazards and resident-specific interventions to reduce and/or eliminate falls with injury. Additionally, the facility failed to update a resident's care plan with person centered fall interventions to potentially prevent future falls. This resulted in Actual Harm for one resident when Resident #34 experienced a fall on 07/12/23 which was not investigated to implement effective interventions to potentially prevent future falls. As a result of the fall, Resident #34 sustained a fracture of the nasal bones and a spleen laceration Grade 3 from this fall. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a fall investigation for Residents #43 and #42 to potentially prevent future falls. This affected three (Residents #34, #43, and #42) of three residents reviewed for falls. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable of a resident's transfer requirements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, facility policy review and review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident #273370, the facility failed to ensure two staff were present during resident transfers using a mechanical lift. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 09/17/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, congestive heart failure, epilepsy, anxiety, dementia, and Bell's Palsy.Review of the comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/13/26, revealed Resident #16 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the care plan initiated 03/19/25 and revised 08/24/25 revealed Resident #16 had an activities of daily life self care performance deficit related to dementia and limited mobility. Interventions included: transfer, I require a mechanical lift and two assist for transferring.Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #273370 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of meal order ticket, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide meals per resident preferences. This affected one (#11) of one resident reviewed for food preferences and had the ability to affect all residents that receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified all 51 residents receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/17/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, congestive heart failure, anxiety, and seizures.Review of Resident #11's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a cognitive deficit. The resident was dependent on staff for all care.Review of Resident #11's most recent care plan revealed the resident required supervision and sometimes feeding assistance. Observation of breakfast service on 03/25/26 at 7:35 A.M. revealed Resident #11 was served pureed sausage, scrambled eggs, pureed toast, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued narcotics were properly disposed of in a timely manner. This affected eight (#28, #30, #38, #62, #63, #65, #70, and #71) of eight residents reviewed for narcotic medications and who had the narcotic medication discontinued. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. The resident expired on [DATE].Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed a physician's order dated [DATE] for Tramadol oral tablet 50 milligrams (mg) to be administered by mouth twice daily for pain.Observation of the 100-hall medication cart on [DATE] at 7:02 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #251 verified 15 Tramadol tablets remained in the medication cart for Resident #71. LPN #251 verified Resident #71 had passed away in the facility on [DATE].2. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received feeding assistance in a dignified manner. This affected one (#56) of three residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 09/27/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, stroke, anorexia, dysphagia, and dementia with agitation.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 01/01/26, revealed Resident #56 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision/touching assistance for eating.Review of the care plan initiated 02/22/24, and revised 08/28/25, revealed Resident #56 had an activity of daily life self-care performance deficit related to dementia. Interventions stated the resident requires maximum assistance and may need to be fed by staff. Observation on 03/25/26 at 7:22 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #300 taking Resident #56's breakfast tray into the room and walking out to continue to pass other resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of a personnel file, review of camera footage, policy review, and review of Self-Reported Incident #272120 the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse. This affected two (#11 and #65) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/17/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, congestive heart failure, anxiety, and seizures. Review of Resident #11's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a cognitive deficit. The resident was dependent on staff for all care. Review of Resident #11's most recent care plan revealed she had pain related to osteoarthritis in multiple sites. The resident had an activity of daily living care performance deficit related to confusion, dementia, and limited mobility. Interventions included two staff members to reposition and turn in bed, and the resident required a mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, personnel file review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the state agency as required. This affected one (#65) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 07/23/25 and a discharge date of 03/02/26 with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, obesity, tremor, need for assistance with personal care, and Parkinsonism.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/28/26, revealed Resident #65 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #65's care plan, initiated 07/29/25, and revised 08/12/25, revealed Resident #65 elected to have video monitoring in his room.Review of Resident #65's progress notes, dated 12/01/25 through 12/22/25, revealed no evidence of verbal abuse by staff.Review of the personnel file, on 03/26/26 at approximately 11:45 A.M., for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #221 revealed a Corrective Action Report (CAR), signed 01/01/26. Review of the CAR revealed LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, personnel file review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse. This affected one (#65) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 07/23/25 and a discharge date of 03/02/26 with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, obesity, tremor, need for assistance with personal care, and Parkinsonism.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/28/26, revealed Resident #65 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #65's care plan, initiated 07/29/25, and revised 08/12/25, revealed Resident #65 elected to have video monitoring in his room.Review of Resident #65's progress notes, dated 12/01/25 through 12/22/25, revealed no evidence of verbal abuse by staff.Review of the personnel file, on 03/26/26 at approximately 11:45 A.M., for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #221 revealed a Corrective Action Report (CAR), signed 01/01/26. Review of the CAR revealed LPN #221 received written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering as needed psychotropic medications to residents. This affected three (#11, #30, and #60) of four residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/08/25. Diagnoses included hip fracture, dementia, anxiety, and bipolar. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 02/11/26 for non-pharmacological interventions to be documented for monitoring as needed. Non pharmacological interventions included relaxation, quiet room, massage, food, fluids, music, repositioning, involve in activity, medication for pain, other to be documented in the progress nursing notes. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 03/10/26 for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) to be administered every four hours as needed for anxiety for 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the daily menu, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received the planned menu. This affected three (#11, #15, and #56) of three residents identified on a pureed diet. The facility census was 51. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 02/08/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restlessness and agitation, anxiety, dementia, and dysphagia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for eating, activities of daily living and mobility.Review of the current physician orders revealed an order dated 03/20/26 for a regular diet with pureed texture, nectar consistency, with liquids provided via straw, and an order dated 02/26/26 for med pass 2.0, 120 milliliters (ml) twice daily for weight loss, give before lunch and before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained on the use of mechanical lifts. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift use. The facility identified 28 residents who were dependent on a mechanical lift for transfers. The facility census was 54.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 05/01/25. Diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, and depression.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/05/25, revealed Resident #25 was cognitively impaired and was assessed to require partial assistance from sitting to standing.Review of the care plan dated 05/01/25 revealed Resident #25 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, dementia, fatigue, and impaired balance. Interventions included maximum assistance of one to two staff to transfer.Observation on 11/25/25 at 9:18 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #300 attempted to transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent for care received showers as scheduled. This affected three (#1, #25, and #31) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 54.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/23/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, weakness, and parkinsonism (causes movement problems such as tremors, stiffness and slow movements and balance issues).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/28/25, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required maximal (staff) assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan, revised on 08/12/25, revealed Resident #1 had and ADL self-care performance deficit related to parkinsonism. Interventions included providing a sponge bath when a full bath or shower could not be tolerated, and the resident required maximum (staff) assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/23/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, weakness, and parkinsonism (causes movement problems such as tremors, stiffness and slow movements and balance issues).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/28/25, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required maximal (staff) assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan, dated 07/23/25, revealed Resident #1 had bowel incontinence related to mobility. Interventions included to assist with toileting as needed.Review of a wound care progress note dated 11/20/25 revealed Resident #1 was seen for an area on his buttocks, with a new diagnosis of irritant dermatitis due to body fluid.Interview on 11/25/25 at 8:30 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0774 — isolated
    Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on family, provider, and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure transportation to medical appointments. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for outside medical appointments. The facility census was 54. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/13/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, retention of urine, and anxiety.Review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/25, revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition. Resident #31 was (staff) dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note date 05/05/25 revealed Resident #31 was seen for a follow-up evaluation of diabetes with neuropathy (damage to nerves outside the brain that causes pain, tingling and numbness in hands and feet), and left hemiparesis. Further review revealed Resident #31 had left shoulder pain likely due to osteoarthritis and stiffness. The NP referred Resident #31 to Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the dietary spreadsheets (DS), medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure correct portion sizes for meals. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for portion sizes. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 09/17/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, and epilepsy.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/25, revealed Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment.Review of the care plan dated 09/18/24 revealed Resident #3 had nutritional problems or a potential nutritional problem related to Alzheimer's and received a mechanically altered diet related to dysphagia. Interventions included providing diet as ordered, and monitoring intakes.Review of the DS for 11/25/25 revealed the lunch meal for a pureed diet was six ounces of pureed baked potato soup, six ounces of pureed [NAME] Marzetti (pasta dish), four ounces of pureed home fried potatoes, four ounces of pureed seasoned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute diastolic heart failure, essential hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 05/16/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance with toileting, showering, lower and upper body dressing, personal hygiene, and applying footwear. Observation on 06/23/25 at 9:27 A.M. revealed Resident #42 in the recliner chair in the resident room and the call light on the floor near the bed. The call light was not within reach. Interview on 06/23/25 at 9:29 A.M. with Resident #42 verified she utilizes her call light. Interview on 06/23/25 at 9:30 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #284 verified the call light was on the floor and not within reach of the resident. Interview on 06/25/25 at 2:09 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #207 verified Resident #42 does utilize her call light. Review of policy, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of medication error. This affected one resident (#54) reviewed for notification to provider of a change. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/14/25. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes mellitus type II, cirrhosis of the liver, chronic kidney disease, peptic ulcer (ulcer in the lining of the stomach) and prostate cancer. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #54 revealed he was cognitively intact. Interview on 06/24/25 at 9:09 A.M. with Resident #54 stated he does not recall receiving his bedtime medication on 06/23/25. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #54 revealed no documentation of physician notification of the missed medication. Interview on 06/24/25 at 4:29 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure podiatry care services. This affected one (#22) of one resident reviewed for podiatry. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced transverse fracture of shaft of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unilateral primary osteoarthritis, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, adult failure to thrive, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/09/25, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation on 06/25/25 at 1:58 P.M. revealed Resident #22's left foot toes were long, thick, and curling under the toes. Interview on 06/25/25 at 2:50 P.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #299 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (#54) resident reviewed for medication error. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/14/25. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes mellitus type II, cirrhosis of the liver, chronic kidney disease, peptic ulcer (ulcer in the lining of the stomach) and hypotension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #54 revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician orders from 06/25 for Resident #54 revealed he was ordered the following medication for bedtime: lantus insulin 12 units subcutaneously (subQ) (used to control diabetes mellitus), patoprazole sodium delayed release 40 milligrams (mg) (used for stomach ulcers), rifaximin 550mg (used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure significant medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (#54) resident reviewed for significant medication error. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/14/25. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes mellitus type II, cirrhosis of the liver with ascites (fluid build up in the abdomen from a failing liver), chronic kidney disease, and hypotension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #54 revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician orders from 06/25 for Resident #54 revealed he was ordered the following medication for bedtime: lantus insulin 12 units subcutaneously (subQ) (used to control diabetes mellitus), rifaximin 550mg (used for cirrhosis of the liver), lactulose oral solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of late medication report, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a timely manner. This affected four (#2, #33, #36, and #54) of four residents reviewed for late medications. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/30/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, congenital malformation of the heart, hypertension, and fibrothorax. Review of current physician orders revealed furosemide 40 milligrams (mg) daily at 7:00 A.M. (water pill), Jardiance 10 mg daily at 8:00 A.M. (diabetes), metoprolol tartrate 25 mg twice daily at 9:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. (blood pressure), amiodarone 200 mg daily at 9:00 A.M. (heart), and apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily at 9:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. Review of late medication report dated 03/31/25 revealed the above listed medications were administered at 11:38 A.M. 2. Review of medical record for Resident #33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had call light within reach while up in wheelchair. This affected one resident (#1) of nine residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 05/08/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, unspecified psychosis, hypertension, anxiety, alcohol use with withdrawal delirium, depression, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toileting. Observation on 04/02/25 at 1:35 P.M. revealed Resident #1 was sitting up in wheelchair in room. Call light was observed lying on the bed out of reach for the resident. Interview on 04/02/25 at 1:37 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #174) verified Resident #1 call light was not within reach of the resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely orders were in implemented to address the care and needs of a stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) affecting Resident #5, failed to ensure accurate and ongoing skin monitoring for Resident #39, and failed to ensure wound care recommendations were implemented for Residents #5 and #39. This affected two (#5 and #39) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/28/24. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and a urinary tract infection. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact, independent for toilet and personal hygiene, was occasionally incontinent of urine, and had one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and treatment of a resident's urinary catheter. This affected one (#13) resident of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 52. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 04/24/24. Diagnoses included acute cystitis with hematuria, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and paraplegia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact, required maximal assistance from staff for toilet hygiene. Review of a nurse progress note dated 06/18/24 revealed Resident #13 was sent to the Emergency Department for evaluation of blood in urine. On 06/21/24 at 9:13 A.M., Resident #13 returned from hospital with an indwelling urinary catheter in place to gravity with yellow colored urine with sediment. The nurse progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident funds. This affected one (#40) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and major depressive disorder recurrent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/24, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #242873, created 01/08/24 and completed on 01/12/24, revealed the Administrator was notified by Resident #40's financial administrator the resident's credit card was taken and used to make in person purchases at three stores (grocery and gas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate misappropriation of resident funds. This affected one (#40) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and major depressive disorder recurrent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/24, revealed Resident #40 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #242873, created 01/08/24 and completed on 01/12/24, revealed the Administrator was notified by Resident #40's financial administrator the resident's credit card was taken and used to make in person purchases at three stores (grocery and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident representative and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for two (#21 and #47) of three residents reviewed for falls. In addition, the facility failed to ensure one (#28) of three residents reviewed for transfers were assisted by two staff for transfer with a mechanical hoyer lift. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of neck, unspecified fracture of shaft of humerus left arm, malignant neoplasm of unspecified breast, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/12/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #21 was at risk for falls, with an actual fall on 3/9/24. Fall interventions, updated 03/13/24, included to keep the bed in the lowest position when in it to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner and failed to serve meals in a sanitary manner to potentially prevent foodborne illnesses. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Observations and interview during an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/02/23 at 8:22 A.M. along with Director of Dietary (DD) #235 revealed the following concerns: • Two rolling large trash receptacles were observed to have no lid. DD #235 obtained one lid from behind a rolling metal cart. The lid was noted to have a large amount of oily looking grease on both sides and black substances on the rim. DD #235 placed the lid in the sink. • The smaller, reach-in refrigerator had a moderate amount of food particles laying on the floor, and a large amount of dried food smeared on the door, the door handles, and the inner frame. Small dessert dishes were stored on an open shelf with the inside facing up. • A small chest-type freezer, holding ice cream, had a small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This affected eight (#7, #17, #18, #22, #30, #36, #38, and #41) of 14 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 50. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/30/21. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/25/23, revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition. Observation on 10/02/23 at 10:39 A.M. in Resident #36's room revealed there were several stains on the carpet as well as large wrinkles in the carpet. Interview on 10/02/23 at 10:39 A.M., with Resident #36 revealed the carpet had been in bad shape for around the past year. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 04/04/23. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/08/23, revealed Resident #41 had impaired cognition. Observation on 10/02/23 at 10:35 A.M. in Resident #41's room revealed there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated medications were stored at an appropriate temperature. This affected one (Resident #37) and had the potential to affect 12 residents with refrigerated medications. The facility identified 12 (Residents #1, #2, #5, #11, #14, #15, #22, #29, #30, #35, #37 and #41) who had refrigerated medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/07/22 and a readmission date of 04/21/23 with a diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus. Review of a physician order dated 09/21/23 revealed Resident #37 received Novolog FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 units per milliliter (ml) (insulin aspart), inject 18 units subcutaneously one time a day related to type two diabetes mellitus. Observation and interview on 10/04/23 at 10:45 A.M. with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) revealed the locked medication room had one small and one large refrigerator for storing residents' medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to provide a pureed meal as approved by the dietitian for four (Residents #11, #21, #28, and #42) of four reviewed for pureed diets. The facility was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/30/21. Review of the physician orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 08/06/21 for a regular diet, pureed texture. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 06/23/20. Review of the physician orders for Resident #21 revealed an order dated 07/14/22 for a regular diet, pureed texture. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 07/04/22. Review of the physician orders for Resident #28 revealed an order dated 07/30/22 for a regular diet, pureed texture. 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 03/23/23. Review of the physician orders for Resident #42 revealed an order dated 05/01/23 for a regular diet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure gloves were worn when obtaining a blood glucose level and injecting insulin to one resident (#35) of two observed for receiving insulin and having blood glucose level monitored. The facility further failed to ensure the glucometer was disinfected after use. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately completed hand hygiene following the completion of incontinence care. This affected one resident (#28) of six reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/02/23. Diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the physician order dated 09/07/23 for insulin Glargine inject 23 units subcutaneously daily for diabetes mellitus. Observation on 11/03/23 at 7:40 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #256 obtained a glucometer from the medication cart and used it to monitor the blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or booster vaccine. This affected four (Residents #22, #33, #41, and #47) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/19/23 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. Review of the immunizations for Resident #22 revealed he received a COVID-19 booster vaccine on 10/22/21. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 01/02/21. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had impaired cognition. Review of the immunizations for Resident #33 revealed she received a COVID-19 vaccine on 01/04/21 and 01/25/21. Additionally, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to issue notifications to residents who receive Medicaid benefits when their funds accounts were 200 dollars ($) less than the resource limit. This affected three (#14, #16, and #33) of five residents reviewed for resident trust accounts. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/27/19 and a payor source of Medicaid. The facility identified Resident #14 had a Resident Trust Account with the facility. Review of the quarterly statements for Resident #14's Trust Account from 07/19/22 through 09/30/23 revealed a month-end balance on 12/31/22 of $1,826.87, on 04/30/23 of $1,815.18, on 05/31/23 of $1,870.78, on 06/30/23 of $1,926.88, on 07/31/23 of $1,982.93, on 08/31/23 of $2,014.55, and on 09/30/23 of $2,070.39. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/20/18 and a payor source of Medicaid. The facility identified Resident #16 had a Resident Trust Account with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident advance directives for code status were accurate. This affected one (#33) of 12 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 had an admission date of 05/19/20 and a readmission date of 01/02/21. Resident #33's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, dementia, chronic pain, and chronic obstruction pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/26/23, revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition. Review of a physician order, dated 11/10/21, revealed Resident #33 had elected a full code status. Review of the electronic medical record code status line for Resident #33 revealed Resident #33's code status was a full code. Review of a physician order, dated 09/12/23, revealed Resident #33 had elected for a Do Not Rescuscitate (DNR) comfort care arrest (DNRCC-A) code status (the provider would treat Resident #33 as any other resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person centered care plan adequately addressed resident activity preferences/interests and activities of daily living. This affected two residents (#31 and #42) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The faciity census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 09/11/23 with a diagnosis of depression. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/15/23, revealed Resident #31 had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one person for transfers and locomotion. Resident #31 did not exhibit rejection of care. Resident #31 was not interviewed for her activity preferences. Review of the active care plan for Resident #31 revealed the care plan did not address activities and/or Resident #31's activity preferences. Interview on 10/11/23 at 8:40 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed Resident #31's care plan did not address Resident #31's interests or desired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed/showered as scheduled and requested. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 50. Finding include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed Resident #7 had an admission date of 02/21/23. Resident #7's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, depression, and fibromyalgia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/21/23, revealed Resident #7 had impaired cognition. Resident #7 required extensive assistance of two staff for personal hygiene. The assessment indicated the bathing activity had not occurred in the look back period for Resident #7. Review of Resident #7's care plan, dated 03/19/23, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self care performance deficit related to limited mobility. There were no interventions specific to bathing or showering. Review of Resident #7's care plan, dated 09/01/23, revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide resident-centered activities for two (Residents #31 and #34) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 09/11/23 with a diagnosis of depression. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one person for transfers and locomotion. Resident #31 did not exhibit rejection of care. Further review of Resident #31's MDS assessment revealed a section for addressing her preferences for customary routine and activities with the following instructions: Attempt to interview all residents able to communicate. If resident is unable to complete, attempt to complete interview with family member or significant other. The assessment was marked no indicating the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected one (Resident #49) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Further, the facility failed to separate and dispose of medications for discharged residents and expired residents. This affected three (Residents #306, #307, and #308) of three discharged residents and one (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for expired medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 08/09/23 with a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus. Review of a physician order dated 08/09/23 revealed Resident #49 should receive insulin glargine (to lower blood sugar) subcutaneous (below the skin) solution pen-injector 100 units per milliliter (ml); inject 20 units subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes mellitus. Review of the October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #49 revealed a 9 documented on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely respond to pharmacist recommendations. This affected two (Residents #41 and #43) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 01/10/23 with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, restless legs, and mood disorder due to known physiological condition with major depressive-like episode. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was rarely/never understood and received an antidepressant seven times during the previous seven days. Review of a current physician order dated 03/06/23 revealed Resident #41 received Zoloft (an anti-depressant) 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily for anxiety. Review of the progress notes for Resident #41 revealed she was seen by Psych Group #500 to manage her psychotropic (mood altering) medications on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication pass, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#35) of one observed to receive insulin. The facility identified four residents who receive insulin in the 100 hall. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/02/23 with a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the physician order dated 09/07/23 for insulin Glargine inject 23 units subcutaneously daily for diabetes mellitus. Observation on 10/04/23 at 7:30 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #256 obtained a blood glucose on Resident #35 of 123 millimeters of mercury. LPN #256 obtained a pen of Insulin Glargine from the medication cart, verified the resident's name and expiration date and dialed the pen to 23. LPN #256 proceeded to and inject the 23 units in the resident's left arm. LPN #256 did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. Interview at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine. This affected three (Residents #22, #41, and #47) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccination. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/19/23 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. Review of the immunizations for Resident #22 revealed no information regarding a pneumococcal vaccination. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 04/04/23. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had impaired cognition. Review of the immunizations for Resident #41 revealed no information regarding a pneumococcal vaccination. 3. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and sanitary. This affected two (#4 and #34) of 56 resident rooms reviewed for the environment. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #4 revealed an admission date 03/28/18. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/18/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Observation on 04/26/21 at 11:44 A.M. of Resident #4's bathroom shower wall revealed it had a large area of plaster and had not been painted. In the resident's room, the carpet had a large stain area located in front of the resident's bed. Interview on 04/29/21 at 11:42 A.M., with Resident #4 reported the bathroom wall had been that way for two years. It was fixed with plaster and never painted. The plaster fell out and was plastered again and had not been painted. 2. Medical record review for Resident #34 admission date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI), medical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency as required. This affected two residents (#3 and #8) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 10/09/19. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed the Adderall 30 milligrams (mg.) was scheduled for before lunch and before dinner. The Xanax was scheduled daily at HS (hours of sleep/bedtime). Review of a Customer Concern Form, dated 03/01/21, revealed Resident #3 reported Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 tried to administer Adderall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide proper wound care to residents as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#19) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified five residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 56. Findings included: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/11/14. Diagnosis included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuromuscular bladder, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and malignant neoplasm of the palate. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 02/22/21, revealed the resident had a high cognitive function. The resident was at a high risk for developing a pressure ulcer and did have one stage two pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough), and two stage four pressure ulcers (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed). Review of the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were available as ordered by the physician. This affected two (#3 and #8) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 56. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 10/09/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, asthma, fibromyalgia, pain in right shoulder, pain in left shoulder, and low back pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #3 was prescribed Lyrica (pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg.) orally three times a day, Incruse Ellipta Aerosol (used to treat respiratory ailments) 62.5 microgram per inhalation one puff once daily and Remeron (used to treat depression) 15 mg. orally once daily. Review of the medication administration records (MARs) for 02/2021 and 04/2021 revealed Lyrica, Incruse Ellipta Aerosol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician acted timely to address pharmacy recommendations. This affected three (Resident #2, #3 and #13) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 05/10/19 and a readmission date of 05/13/20. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the pharmacy recommendations, dated 02/26/21, revealed Resident #2 was on Sertraline (antidepressant) 50 milligrams (mg.) by mouth daily. The pharmacist requested the physician consider a gradual dosage reduction for the medication. The physician declined and signed the recommendations on 04/27/21, which was 60 days after the medication review by the pharmacist. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 10/09/19. Diagnoses included anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-11 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report, review of staffing schedule, review of an employee time card, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information submitted for the PBJ report was accurate. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the PBJ staffing data report for 01/01/23 through 03/31/23 revealed the facility had no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 03/04/23. Review of the facility schedule dated 03/04/23 revealed agency Registered Nurse (RN) #312 was scheduled from 2:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. Review of the employee timecard for RN #312 revealed the nurse worked from 2:00 P.M. to 10:03 P.M. Interview on 10/04/23 at 5:30 P.M., the Project Manager (PM) #300 revealed the facility incorrectly submitted data to the PBJ for RN #312. PM #300 stated the nurse was entered into the PBJ as a licensed practical nurse and should have been entered as a registered nurse. Review of the policy, Staffing, revised 10/2017, revealed direct care staffing information per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$40,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $40,433 — penalty dated 2023-10-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHI LIVING COMMUNITIESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2008
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 11/01/2014
CECIL, CAITLINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2012
FINN, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2017
GRUBBS, STACEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2012
HAZARD, TEDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/08/2017
MBANU, TERIKAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/05/2024
MELFI, MITCHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/23/2016
MUNROE, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2015
MURRIEL, SHELLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2024
NAGEL, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/12/2015
SNODGRASS, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2016
WINE, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
IFFLAND, ALISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2017
LIPSEY, PRENTICEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2021
REHMER, HEATHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2024
CONCEPT REHAB, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2015
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2025
ICP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
OHIO NEWSPAPERS, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2025
ULRICHPINCIOTTI DESIGN GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2011
CECIL, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/06/2024
GRAY, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/30/2022
GRIME, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/02/2020
HOWARD, CASEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
LONGHIN-HOWARD, JOANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2007
MARSH, SARAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
MCFARLAND, DIANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2023
MOSCIONI, MARIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/30/2024
PETERNEL, VICTORIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/10/2024
POLISETTY, SUDHEERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
RIZZO, KARINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/12/2024
TAFELSKI, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/08/2023
SYLVANIA FRANCISCAN HEALTHOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
LUCAS, GINAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2024
NORMENT, RACHELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 70 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-62.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$631K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 17%Medicare 4%Other / private 79%

This home reported $631K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$550per resident / day
operating cost
$16,733per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next