No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Garrison Mem Hosp Nsg Fac

407 3rd Ave SE, Garrison, ND 58540 · Non profit - Church related · 26 certified beds · (701) 463-2275 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (701) 463-2275 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Apr 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
437 3rd Ave SE · (701) 463-2245 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
21 Main St N · (701) 463-2242 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
339 4th Ave SE · (701) 463-2215 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(701) 463-2600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
307 2nd Ave SE · (701) 463-2049

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%19.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.2%4.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%5.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.2%17.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.2%17.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%24.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%22.7%17.1%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.02U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.08
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
68.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 26 beds and averages 19.8 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.42 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.56 to 2.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-08)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to fully inform the resident or resident representative regarding treatment with psychotropic medications for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#2, #4, #5, #9, and #16) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to fully inform the resident or the resident's representative of the risks, benefits, alternatives and obtain consent for psychotropic medications does not allow the right to choose treatment options. Findings include: - Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Physician's orders included Buspirone (antianxiety), Duloxetine (antidepressant), Lorazepam (antianxiety), Mirtazapine (antidepressant), and Risperidone (antipsychotic). The medical record lacked documentation the facility informed the resident and/or their representatives of treatment risks, benefits, options, or obtain their consent to the treatment prescribed. - Review of Resident #4's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Physician's orders included Citalopram (antidepressant) and Quetiapine (antipsychotic). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the resident's current status for 6 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, #8, #16, and #21). Failure to update care plans limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care for each resident.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Conference and Resident Centered Care Plan occurred on 04/08/26. This undated policy stated, . A comprehensive resident-centered care plan will be developed and implemented for each resident, consistent with their resident rights, that include measurable goals and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs, and will contain the following: Services to be furnished to the resident to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Care plans will then be reviewed a minimum of quarterly, as the resident/representative requests, or as needed. Care plans will be reviewed by the team at regularly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the dishwasher temperature and chemical concentration logs, review of the manufacturers' guidelines, and vendor and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dishwasher provided adequate heat and sanitization for dishes and utensils washed in 1 of 1 kitchen (main kitchen). Failure to ensure the appropriate wash temperature for the dishwash cycle may result in inadequate cleaning and sanitation of dishware. Findings include:Review of manufacturer specifications for Energy Series 'Green' Machine American Dish Service, Edwardsville, Kansas identified Water Temperature - 120 degrees [Fahrenheit] F.Product specifications for Ultra San Liquid Sanitizer, Ecolab, 2023 Ecolab USA, stated, For Sanitizing Tableware in low-temperature warewashing machines, inject Ultra San into the final rinse water at concentration of 100 ppm available chlorine. Do not exceed 200 ppm .Observation in the main kitchen on 04/08/26 at 8:15 a.m. showed a low temperature chemical sanitizing dishwasher in use. A dietary aide checked the temperature of the wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a change in condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) reviewed for a fall with injury. Failure to notify the physician of the fall, potential fracture, and pain prevented the physician from altering the treatment and care for the resident. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Fall Protocol occurred on April 7, 2026. This policy dated June 2023 stated, . Post-Fall Management . Immediately perform and document complete head-to-toe assessment. including assessment for possible injuries. Notification. 1. Notify the LP [Licensed Practitioner] immediately at the time of the fall; provide the following: . b. Injury or complaint of pain . d. Obtain order for medical interventions/diagnostic procedures . 3. Patient's representative, as appropriate. Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included a right femur fracture. The current care plan stated, . Resident is at risk for falls due to cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of chemical restraints for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to document an assessment and appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication does not allow the resident to attain and/or maintain his/her highest level of practicable well-being.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Antipsychotic Drugs occurred on 04/08/26. This policy, dated September 2022 stated, . Based on a comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that: A. Residents who have not used antipsychotic drugs are not given these drugs unless antipsychotic drug therapy is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety. Medications included Risperidone (antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #5) observed to self-administer medications (SAM). Failure to assist/observe residents who are not SAM take their medications may result in adverse health consequences.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medication occurred on 04/08/26. This policy, dated January 2024, stated, . Drugs can be left at the bedside and self-administered by the resident only if ordered by the physician. nursing will assess resident/patient for appropriateness of self-administering, this form will be kept in the MAR [medication administration record] . Observation on 04/06/26 at 5:00 p.m. showed Resident #5 seated in the dining room and a medication cup containing several pills on the meal tray in front of the resident. The nurse (#2) administered medications to other residents in the dining room. Resident #5 picked up the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) with an indwelling urinary catheter. Failure to obtain a physician's order for an indwelling catheter and catheter cares may result in urinary tract infections (UTIs), discomfort, skin issues, and sepsis.Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified an indwelling urinary catheter since admission on [DATE]. The physician's orders failed to include an order for an indwelling urinary catheter or how often to replace the catheter. The record showed facility staff changed the catheter 01/18/26, 15 weeks after admission. Review of Resident #8's progress note, dated 01/18/26 at 5:19 p.m., stated . resident reported severe pain to his catheter insertion site. Urine in tubing noted to be puss [sic] like with some blood noted. Catheter was irrigated with approx [sic] 40 cc [cubic centimeter a unit of measure] of normal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, professional reference review, and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain an order for oxygen for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #12) observed with oxygen. Failure to obtain a physician's order for oxygen use may result in complications and compromise the residents' respiratory status.Findings include: Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing, Concepts, Process and Practice, 11th Edition eText, 2021, Pearson, Boston, Massachusetts, page 1292, stated, . Oxygen Therapy . The medical administration of supplemental oxygen is considered to be a process similar to that of administering medications and requires similar nursing actions. Oxygen therapy is prescribed by the healthcare provider, who orders the concentration, method of delivery, and depending on the method, liter flow per minute .Review of Resident #12's medical record occurred on April 7-8, 2026, and identified the resident returned to the facility the afternoon of 04/06/26 following an acute hospital stay for pneumonia and exacerbation (flare up) of congestive heart failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #5, #6, and #8) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), personal protective equipment (PPE), hand hygiene, and surface disinfection has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 04/08/26. This policy, revised March 2026, stated, . Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions include: Dressing .Transferring, Providing hygiene, Changing linens, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting . Wound care: any skin opening requiring a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policies, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Residents #1, #4, #5, and #7). Failure to update care plans limited the staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Plan and Care Plan Meeting occurred on 02/26/25. This policy, dated December 2023, stated, . C. Develop a care plan based upon information from the Interdisciplinary Team. Review of the facility policy titled Care Conference and Resident Centered Care Plan occurred on 02/26/25. This policy, dated June 1985, stated, . 2. The care plan will include . b) Physician orders . c) Dietary orders . 3. The . care plan will be . b. Developed by an interdisciplinary team, that includes . i. the attending physician . iv. dietary staff member . c. Reviewed and revised . by each member . 5. A comprehensive resident-centered care plan will be developed and implemented for . a) Services .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 14 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the State Agency (SA) facility files, survey findings, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to evaluate and identify problems and opportunities to improve services/outcomes, decrease or prevent likelihood of problems or occurrence of adverse events, and ensure compliance with federal requirements. Findings include: Review of the state agency files indicated the facility failed to maintain compliance at F658 as indicated by a deficiency cited during the last standard survey on 12/20/23. Refer to F658. During an interview on 02/27/25 at 11:53 a.m., an administrative staff member (#1) stated, We work with quality on the hospital side, we do QA [quality assurance] audits here [for the nursing home] and bring those results to the hospital meeting. When asked what the facility did to develop the plan of correction and conduct audits following the federal survey, an administrative nurse (#2) stated she thought staff completed audits for a year. The administrative staff members (#1 and #2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 2 of 13 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #15) and one supplemental resident (Resident #14). Failure to follow a physician's order, document medications after administration, properly prime insulin pens, and provide privacy during insulin administration, may impede the therapeutic effectiveness of the medications, cause adverse events such as medication errors and low blood sugar, and infringes upon the residents right to privacy. Findings include: Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, Process, and Practice, 11th Edition eText, 2021, Pearson, Boston, Massachusetts, page 63, stated, . Carrying Out a Physician's Orders . Nurses are expected to analyze procedures and medications ordered by the physician or primary care provider. It is the nurse's responsibility to seek clarification of ambiguous or seemingly erroneous orders from the prescriber. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration occurred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #13) observed without wheelchair foot pedals. Failure to use wheelchair foot pedals while transporting residents, places all residents at risk for falls and/or injury. Findings include: The facility failed to provide a policy for foot pedal use upon request. - Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified functional limitations in range of motion with lower extremity impairment on both sides and dependance on staff for wheelchair transfers. The current care plan stated, . Self-Care Deficit R/T [related to] old hip fracture . Locomotion is total assistance of one staff once in wheelchair. During an observation on 02/24/25 at 1:04 p.m., a certified nurse aide (CNA) (#7) wheeled Resident #1 to the activity room. The resident's left foot dragged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #5) with documented weight variances. Failure to obtain weights and reassess weight variances may delay needed treatment for weight loss/gain and alter the resident's ability to maintain a sufficient health/nutritional status. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weighing Residents occurred on 02/27/25. This policy, reviewed February 2023, stated, . It is important to maintain adequate nutritional status . The early identification of residents with, or at risk for, impaired nutrition or hydration status may allow the interdisciplinary team to develop and implement interventions to stabilize or improve nutritional status before complications arise. Monthly weights will be completed by the second week of the month. Weights will be recorded in the EMR [electronic medical record]. Residents will have a consistent method for being weighed . Nurses are responsible for making sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of 3 of 3 insulin pens observed during review of medication storage. Failure to obtain a label for an insulin pen and identify the resident's name and date opened may result in a resident receiving another resident's insulin or outdated insulin. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Insulin pen use occurred on 02/27/25. This policy, revised in 2010, stated, . All Insulin pens must have patient identification label and date opened . Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Insulin occurred on 02/27/25. This policy, revised May 2015 stated, . Insulin pens, stored in cart, once they are used, must have [resident's] name and date on the pen . - Observation on 02/26/25 at 10:00 a.m. showed an administrative nurse (#2) obtained three insulin pens from the medication cart. All three pens lacked a resident's name and an opened date. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 10:14 a.m., an administrative nurse (#2) confirmed she expected staff to follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #13) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #6) requiring stand lift transfers. Failure to practice infection control standards related to disinfection of equipment has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Patient Multi-Use Devices, occurred on 02/27/25. This policy, dated February 2011, stated, . As part of the infection control prevention program, all patient/resident multi-use medical devices must be disinfected between patient/resident uses. These include but are not limited to . Mechanical lift devices . - Observation on 02/24/25 at 1:40 p.m. showed a certified nurse aide (CNA) (#8) transferred Resident #6 from the toilet to a wheelchair using a stand lift. After completing the transfer, the CNA failed to sanitize the lift. When asked if there was a policy for sanitizing the lifts, the CNA (#8) replied,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of nurse staffing schedules, staff time sheets, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for 2 of 91 days reviewed (05/14/23 and 05/26/23). Failure to ensure sufficient, qualified nursing staff are available eight consecutive hours a day has the potential to affect the health and safety of all the residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/18/23, the facility provided a copy of the nurse staffing schedules, and nurse time sheets for the period of April 1 - June 30, 2023. A review of the schedules showed the facility failed to have the required RN coverage on 05/14/23 and 05/26/23. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 2:05 p.m., an administrative staff member (#2) confirmed the facility lacked RN coverage on the above dates.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-20 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dietary manager (#1) maintained the proper qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Failure to ensure staff have the qualifications to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services has the potential to result in foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: During an interview on 12/19/23 at 9:15 a.m., a dietary manager (#1) stated she failed to complete the required number of continuing education hours to maintain certified dietary manager (CDM) certification, and it expired on 11/30/23. The facility failed to ensure the dietary manager (#1) maintained CDM certification.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to remove medication from the bed side for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #6) assessed as not able to self-administer medications (SAM). Failure to remove medication from the resident's room for a resident assessed as not able to self-administer medications may result in medication errors and/or harm to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medication occurred on 12/20/23. This policy, dated 1990, stated, . Each resident has the right to self-administer medications only if an interdisciplinary team determines that it is clinically appropriate. Nursing staff is responsible for safe and adequate drug storage on the Units of all drugs unless physician orders for bedside use. Review of Resident #6's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The record contained a staff assessment for self-administration of medications completed on 11/27/23. The SAM evaluation stated, . Is it appropriate for resident to self -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to promote privacy and confidentiality of the medication administration records for 1 of 3 days of survey. Failure to promote resident privacy may result in viewing of resident records by other residents, visitors, or unlicensed staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration occurred on 12/20/23. This policy, dated February 2008, stated, . 10. Procedure For Passing Medications: . B. Keep the electronic MAR [EMAR] closed while not in use . - Observation on 12/18/23 at 4:53 p.m. showed the medication cart A unattended with the EMAR opened to resident's information. The nurse (#4) returned to the medication cart at 4:59 p.m. - Observation on 12/18/23 at 4:59 p.m. showed a nurse (#4) documented a blood sugar for a resident on the EMAR, prepared an insulin for administration, gathered supplies, took the resident to her room, and failed to secure the EMAR, leaving the resident's information in view. The nurse returned to the medication cart at 5:06 p.m. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident's representative a written bed hold notice for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #3, #5, and #17) reviewed for hospital transfers. Failure to provide a written copy of the bed hold notice and include the reserve bed amount does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding their rights. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Discharge or Transfer of Residents occurred on 12/20/23. This policy, dated October 2017, stated, . To improve care coordination by providing information to the resident/family if going home or the receiving health care organization and provider that can help them provide quality care to our residents. Forms Used: . Bedhold Notice Form. - Review of Resident #3's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Hospital transfers occurred on 04/28/23, 05/23/23, 06/16/23, 10/28/23 and 11/09/23. The record lacked documentation the facility provided the resident and/or their representative with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #17) who received insulin and 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #13) who received eye drops. Failure to document medication administrations after administration, prime insulin pens, and follow the physician's orders when administering medications may impede the therapeutic effectiveness of the medications, cause adverse events such as medication errors and low blood sugar. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration occurred on 12/20/23. This policy, dated February 2008, stated, . Medications are administered only pursuant to a Provider's Orders. 2. Medication Administration Record: A. All medications administered . must be recorded on the electronic MAR . All medications should be charted immediately after they are given . 3. Responsibilities: A. The professional nurse is responsible for the correct administration of medications as ordered by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #13 and #17) observed during medication pass. Three medication errors occurred during staff administration of 28 medications, resulting in a 10% error rate. Failure to administer medications correctly and per physician's orders may result in residents receiving an ineffective dose and experiencing adverse side effects such as low blood sugars. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration occurred on 12/20/23. This policy, dated February 2008, stated, . Medications are administered only pursuant to a Provider's Orders. 3. Responsibilities: A. The professional nurse is responsible for the correct administration of medications as ordered by the doctor. Review of the facility policy titled Insulin Pen Use occurred on 12/20/23. This policy, dated 2010, stated, . prime safety needle with 2 units prior to each administration . Review of Resident #17's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents records contained the hospice election form for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) and the certification of a terminal illness for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #9 and #12) receiving hospice services. Failure to obtain these documents limits staff's ability to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the hospice. Findings include: - Review of Resident #9's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified Resident #9 elected Hospice services on 02/10/23. The medical record lacked the physician's certification of the terminal illness. - Review of Resident #12's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified Resident #12 elected Hospice services on 09/14/23. The medical record lacked the hospice election form and the physician's certification of the terminal illness. During an interview on 12/20/23 at 10:45 a.m., an administrative nurse (#7) confirmed the medical records for Resident #9 lacked the certification of the terminal illness and Resident #12 lacked both the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2019
GARRISON MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/22/1998
ST ALEXIUS MEDICAL CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/22/1998
BOPP, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2018
DAHMEN, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2018
GIESE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2007
HYDER, SYED SHIRAZIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2019
KUIPER, EVERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/17/2022
KUNZE, NICOLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
MILLER, NANCYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2008
MONGEON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2018
PRESZLER, TODDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/26/2016
WEISBECK, MIKEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2019
LEFOR, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/20/2016
REYMAN, REEDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/19/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in ND

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Dakota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Dakota
$11,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,304/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,729/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 355115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next