Franciscan Care Ctr Sylvania
4111 Holland Sylvania Rd, Toledo, OH 43623 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (419) 882-6582 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $337,580 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 76.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 29.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.9%CMS range 43.0–71.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.2–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 83.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.7–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 67.9 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.49 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
91 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 78 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, hospital record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were properly stored in a secured area and outside the reach of residents. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious physical harm, injuries, and/or negative health outcomes on 09/02/25 when Resident #77 applied a mixture of cleaning chemicals to the top of both feet resulting in second degree chemical burns, followed by a repeat incident 30 days later on 10/01/25 when Resident #77 applied an assortment of chemicals to his peri-area and a verbal order was obtained on 10/02/25 to send Resident #77 out to the hospital for evaluation due to altered mental status. On 10/02/25 at 1:18 P.M., Resident #77 was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at 8:03 P.M. with a concern for sepsis (a body's extreme reaction to an infection). Resident #77 had a body temperature of 93.3, and a white creamy discharge from the gastrostomy tube site. Intravenous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate and timely wound assessments were completed, physician notifications were made promptly, and treatments were completed as ordered for newly discovered pressure ulcers. This resulted in actual harm when a resident (#514) was discovered to have an open wound to the skin on [DATE] with no notification to the physician made or adequate assessment of the area completed. The resident continued with no treatment orders or notification of the wound to the physician until [DATE] when the wound was assessed to be larger in size, and on [DATE], was determined to be a stage IV pressure ulcer. Subsequently, following implementation of wound treatment orders, the facility failed to complete Resident #514's wound treatments timely which inhibited the resident's wound healing progression. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure wounds were timely assessed and treatments were provided as ordered for an additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow their policy to for skin assessments, failed to assess the presence of a new pressure ulcer, failed to provide pressure relief interventions as ordered, and failed to ensure the resident was kept dry without a saturated dressing. Actual harm occurred when Resident #1 was discovered with irritant dermatitis to the left buttock with no initial treatment ordered and no additional pressure relieving interventions were implemented. On 10/16/23 the resident was discovered with a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx identified to be of five days duration. Ordered pressure reduction was not implemented as ordered following the identification of the pressure ulcer and the resident was discovered in bed with a saturated brief and dressing to the pressure ulcer. This affected one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for skin breakdown prevention management. The facility identified five current residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of a fall investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to make proper notifications after a fall. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/25/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adult failure to thrive, repeated falls, and scoliosis.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/24/26, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition, required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting, moving from a sitting to standing position, transfers, and bed mobility. Further review revealed Resident #27 did not have a fall since the previous assessment.Review of a nursing progress note dated 04/08/26 revealed Resident #27's daughter came to the facility inquiring about the specifics of a fall Resident #27 sustained that neither she nor hospice were notified of. Review of the undated fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for fall risk and were properly assessed following a fall. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/25/24 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adult failure to thrive, repeated falls, and scoliosis. Review of the annual MDS assessment, dated 03/24/26, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition, required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting, moving from a sitting to standing position, transfers, and bed mobility. Further review revealed Resident #27 did not have a fall since the previous assessment. Review of the fall risk evaluation, dated 06/02/25, revealed Resident #27 was at risk for falls. Review of a nursing progress note dated 04/08/26 revealed Resident #27's daughter came to the facility inquiring about the specifics of a fall Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had accurate orders for and received pertinent medications to provide effective pain management. This affected two (#18 and #27) of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 66.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney injury, adjustment disorder, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety, irritable bowel syndrome, cerebral infarction, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18 revealed she was cognitively intact, did not display any behaviors, and did not refuse care. She required supervision to maximal assistance with activities of daily living. She indicated her worst pain was eight on a scale of one to 10 and her pain occasionally interfered with her daily activities and sleep. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of facility call light logs, review of facility staffing tool, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident needs. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility also failed to timely respond to resident call lights. This affected 42 residents who's call lights alarmed for greater than 30 minutes on 02/15/26 through 02/18/26. The facility census was 71.Findings Include:Review of facility call light logs from 02/15/2026 through 02/18/2026 revealed that 42 residents had call lights that remained activated and unanswered for 30 minutes or longer prior to staff response.Review of the Facility Staffing Tool for 02/12/26 through 02/18/26 revealed facility staffing fell below the Minimum Staffing Requirement on 02/13/25, 02/14/26, and 02/15/26. Interview on 02/18/26 at 11:25 A.M. with Resident #20 revealed call lights are not responded to timely, and she often has to wait for her call light to be answered for greater than 30 minutes. Interview on 02/18/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, by failing to ensure there was adequate staff per their facility assessment. This affected all facility residents. The facility census was 71.Findings Include:Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 11/15/25, revealed the facility would staff Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) at a ratio of one CNA to every 15 to 18 residents.Review of the facility census report for 02/15/26 revealed the facility had a census of 69 residents. Review of overnight staffing records for 02/15/26 revealed that two CNAs were assigned to the facility. Based on a census of 69 residents the two CNAs on duty were responsible for the care of 34.5 residents each. The ratio of residents to CNAs was 1 to 34.5.Review of the facility census report for 02/16/26 revealed that the facility had a census of 70 residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, physician interview, medical record review, review of resident skin assessments, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely physician notification of a change in condition for a resident. This affected one(#7) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 71.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/24/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiac arrythmia, other signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphedema, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension (HTN), morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #7's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #7's cognition was relatively intact. Further review of this MDS assessment revealed she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received grooming and feeding assistance. This affected two (#7 and #55) of three residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 71.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/24/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiac arrythmia, other signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system, need for assistance with personal care, generalized muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphedema, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension (HTN), morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #7's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers treatments were implemented per physician order and further failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention interventions were implemented. This affected two (#27 and #7) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/29/25 with diagnoses including acute onset osteomyelitis, stage four pressure ulcer of other site, need for assistance with personal care, cellulitis of right lower limb, lymphedema, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right ankle, stage four pressure ulcer of right heel, and hypertension (HTN).Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/03/26, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #27's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #27 required supervision to moderate assistance for all functional abilities including,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the mechanical lift manufactures user manual, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lifts were maintained in a safe working condition. This affected one (#24) of one resident reviewed for mechanical lifts. The facility identified 22 residents who utilized mechanical lifts for transfers. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 03/04/23 with a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24, dated 12/11/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #24's cognition was relatively intact. Further review of this MDS assessment revealed Resident #24's upper and lower extremities were impaired on both sides, and she was dependent for all functional abilities including, but not limited to, toileting, showering/bathing self, dressing, hygiene, turning and repositioning, and transferring.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to obtain Resident #48's weight in January 2026, resulting in an unrecognized, significant unplanned weight loss. This had the potential to affect two residents who the facility identified as having unplanned weight loss. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified systolic congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, and unspecified intestinal obstruction.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #48 required use of a wheelchair for mobility and required supervision or touching assistance with eating. Resident #48 required substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's).Review of the care plan dated 02/18/25 revealed Resident #48 had self-care performance deficit related to limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 78 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed by a licensed nurse. This affected one (#20) of four residents reviewed for administration of treatments. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the Medical Record for Resident #20 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, osteoarthritis, and morbid obesity.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact. Resident #20 was dependent on staff for transfers using a mechanical lift.Review of the care plan dated 06/25/25 revealed Resident #20 had a break in skin integrity. Interventions included treatments as ordered, and weekly skin checks. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #20 was at risk for skin breakdown. Interventions included clean and dry skin after each incontinent episode and treatments as ordered. Additional review of the care plan revealed Resident #20 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received meals to meet the resident's nutrition needs. This affected one (Resident #55) of three reviewed for feeding assistance The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, adult failure to thrive, and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight. Resident #55 was assessed to require assistance with meals and was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care.Review of the care plan dated 06/20/24 revealed Resident #55 had ADL self-care performance deficit related to impaired vision, and arthritis. Staff were to help Resident #55 eat and encourage to feed self if possible. Resident #55 was blind and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility investigation, review of a police report, review of the facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect by a nurse to the State Survey Agency, Ohio Department of Health. This had the potential to affect 13 residents (#3, #5, #16, #18, #25, #32, #34, #47, #56, #60, #65, #66, and #67) in which the nurse was responsible for the night of the allegation of neglect. The facility census was 64.Findings include: Review of the facility provided timeline for 12/12/25 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 punched in for work on 12/12/25 at 10:20 P.M. and received report from the off-going LPN, LPN #152, at approximately 11:00 P.M. At approximately 11:12 P.M. on 12/12/25 LPN #152 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #144 drove LPN #200 to the gas station and he did not return to the facility until 11:27 P.M. on 12/12/25. Review of the police report revealed on 12/12/25, a resident of the nursing home called emergency 9-1-1 and reported her nurse was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of the police report, review of facility policy, and review of the facility's investigation, the facility failed to complete and thorough investigation of possible resident neglect by a nurse. This had the potential to affect 13 residents (#3, #5, #16, #18, #25, #32, #34, #47, #56, #60, #65, #66, and #67) which the nurse was responsible for the night of the allegation of neglect. The facility census was 64.Findings include: Review of the police report revealed on 12/12/25, a resident of the nursing home called emergency 9-1-1 and reported her nurse was intoxicated and smelled like alcohol. Upon police arrival, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 had glossy eyes, slurred and abnormal speech. Due to LPN #200's impairment, policy began an investigation to determine if resident neglect had occurred, was occurring, or was going to occur. LPN #200 was walking around the facility speaking in a loud voice and using vulgar language in front of residents. On 12/13/25 at 12:45 A.M., LPN #200 was arrested for disorderly conduct: public intoxication; offensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely bathing. This affected two (#515 and #569) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 70.Findings included:1. Review of Resident #569's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/25/24. Diagnoses included dementia, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #569's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of Resident #569's care plan revealed the resident had an ADLs self-care deficit due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, depression, and obesity. Interventions include staff assistance was required to provide a bath or shower, and a sponge bath was to be completed when a full bath or shower could not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the National Library of Medicine webpage, the facility failed to ensure resident bowel movements were monitored to provide interventions to prevent constipation. This affected two (#523 and #552) of two residents reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 70.Findings included:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #523 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), fracture of the sacrum, type two diabetes mellitus, heart disease, osteoarthritis, depression, and anxiety.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #523 revealed was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment, did not refuse care, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was dependent for activities of daily living.Review of the active physician orders as of 11/19/25 for Resident #523 revealed medication orders Colace 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility protocol, the facility failed to ensure staff received a physician's order prior to removing an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (#572) of six residents reviewed with urinary catheters. The facility census was 70. Findings included: Review of Resident #572's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included bacteremia, chronic kidney disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The resident expired under hospice care on [DATE]. Review of Resident #572's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognitive function. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #572's care plan dated [DATE] revealed she had an indwelling Foley catheter due to a neurogenic bladder. Interventions were to monitor for pain or discomfort due to the catheter. Review of Resident #572's nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, staff interviews, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure resident concerns and grievances were addressed timely. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 70. Review of the grievance logs and reports for April 2025 through September 2025 revealed 30 of 75 grievances filed had not been followed up on. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for June 2025 revealed resident concerns related to untimely medication administration and undercooked food. The concerns were not addressed or followed up on.Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for July 2025 revealed resident concerns related to staffing, staff approach, and showers were not addressed or followed up on.Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for August 2025 revealed a report Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #522 had been counseled for being untimely with medication administration.Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for October 2025 revealed resident concerns related to staffing, medication times, and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records, staff interviews, resident interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide timely and adequate care to residents. The affected three (#37, #86, and #97) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living with the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 70. Review of the medical record for Specified Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 10/02/24, diagnoses included obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left bundle branch block, cervical disc degeneration, solitary pulmonary nodule, depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident did not refuse care, was occasionally incontinent, required set-up assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, and required supervision assistance with bathing. Review of task sheets for Residents #37 for the month of April 2025 revealed the absence of documentation to support daily living cares had been provided during the hours of 3:00 P.M. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foul odors were maintained on A, B and C halls. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents on halls A, B, and C. The facility census was 70. Observation on 10/06/25 between 11:45 A.M. and 12:30 P.M. on A, B, and C halls revealed an intermittent foul urine odor throughout each hallway not associated with a resident, resident rooms, or soiled utility room.Observation on 10/07/25 at 11:15 A.M. on A hall revealed an intermittent foul urine odor throughout the hallway and into the adjacent dining room. The odor was not associated with a resident, adjacent resident rooms or soiled utility rooms.Observation on 10/08/25 at 9:10 A.M. at B hall nurse station revealed a foul urine odor in the hallway not associated with a resident, adjacent resident rooms or soiled utility rooms. Observation on 10/14/25 at 2:25 P.M. on A hall revealed an intermittent foul urine odor throughout the hallway and into the adjacent dining room. The odor was not associated with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility self-reported incidents (SRI), staff interviews, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to complete thorough investigations for five of five SRIs reviewed. This affected six (#39, #46, #54, #85, #105, and #108) residents reviewed for facility self-reported incidents. The facility census was 70. Review of the five facility reported self-reported incidents (SRI)'s: 259637 dated 04/23/25, 259639 dated 04/23/25, 259788 dated 04/28/25, 260722 dated 05/22/25, and 262712 dated 07/12/25 revealed thorough investigations were not completed to include any or all of the following: staff interviews and/or statements, resident statements, assessments of like residents, and/or staff education. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 09/20/24 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, staff interviews, resident interviews, review of the facility investigation file, review of personnel files, and review of facility policies the facility failed to ensure accurate orders and documentation were in resident medical records. This affected three (Residents #37, #86, and #97) of three residents reviewed for accurate and complete documentation, one (Resident #37) of one resident reviewed for medication administration, and one (Resident #106) of one resident reviewed for treatment administration. The facility census was 70.1.Review of the medical record for Specified Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 10/02/24, diagnoses included obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left bundle branch block, cervical disc degeneration, solitary pulmonary nodule, depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, did not refuse care, was occasionally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure meal trays were served in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected eight (#34, #48, #51, #53, #54, #58, #65, and #81) of eight residents observed during meal tray service. The facility census was 70. Observation on 10/06/25 between 12:25 and 12:45 revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #525 delivering meal trays to residents. CNA #525 did not perform hand hygiene before she retrieved a meal tray from the cart in the hallway and delivered it to Resident #81's bedside table. CNA #525 touched the bedside table and set up the meal tray for Resident #81; she opened silverware, removed lids from bowls and plates, and inserted a straw into a cup. CNA #525 did not perform hand hygiene before leaving Resident #81's room. CNA #525 returned to the meal tray cart in the hallway, did not perform hand hygiene, and retrieved another meal tray for Resident #51. CNA #525 delivered the meal tray to Resident #51's bedside table. CNA #525 touched the bedside table and did not perform hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and review of the facility policy the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse. This affected one (#105) of one resident reviewed for timely reporting. The facility census was 70. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #105 had an admission date of 08/21/24 with a diagnosis of dementia. Resident #105 was discharged on 06/23/25. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/04/25, revealed Resident #105 was cognitively impaired. Interview on 10/16/25 at 11:10 A.M. with the Administrator stated on 05/19/25 the Former DON #610 met with Resident #105's daughter and the incident of alleged abuse was reported to Former DON #610. The Administrator further stated she was notified on 05/22/25 of the incident by Former DON #610 and she immediately suspended the alleged perpetrator Former Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #601 pending an investigation. Former DON #610 was also suspended pending the investigation for not timely reporting. Further interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the appropriate state agency (The Ohio Department of Mental Health) of a significant change in a resident's mental health condition as required. This affected one Resident (#77) of one resident reviewed for pre admission screening and resident review (PASRR) assessment. The facility census was 70. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, sarcopenia, and epilepsy. Review of the significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had intact cognition. Resident #77 had moderately impaired vision and required supervision for mobility and received antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant medications. Review of medical record for Resident #77 revealed a new diagnosis of disorganized schizophrenia in March 2025. In April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were accurate and completed as ordered. This affected one (#60) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 70. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 07/01/25, diagnoses included disruption of wound healing, infection following procedure, dehiscence of amputated stump, gangrene, acidosis, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was cognitively intact, did not refuse care, and required assistance with activities of daily living. Review of physician orders for Resident #60 revealed right leg above the knee amputation (RAKA) wound care order dated 09/09/25 for betadine to be applied to the surgical incision and wrapped with fluff gauze once daily. Review of Resident #60's after visit summary with the vascular surgeon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by a provider during the duration of the admission from 05/07/25 through discharge on [DATE]. This affected one resident (#104) reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 70. Review of the medical record for Former Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 05/07/25 and a discharge date of 08/21/25. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #104 revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for Resident #104 for physician notes revealed there were no physician progress notes for the resident from admission to discharge. Review of the Facility assessment dated stated residents should expect a standard of care from medical practitioners and other healthcare professionals necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely address psychosocial needs and failed to implement individualized interventions in a timely manner to maintain the highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning and well-being. The resident had a history of paranoia, hoarding behaviors, and the resident was identified to have a history of acquiring items from the facility including hazardous chemicals. This affected one (#77) of one resident reviewed for mood/behavior/emotional status. The census was 70.Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 08/08/22. Diagnoses included unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, sarcopenia, paranoia, and epilepsy. A diagnosis of schizophrenia with disorganized thoughts was added in April 2025. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition, but was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, Power of Attorney (POA) interview, staff interview, medical record review, review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Report and review of the facility's staffing schedule, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet resident needs. This affected four (#9, #1, #4 and #10) of 14 residents reviewed for staffing and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/01/23. Diagnoses included fracture of lower end right humerus subsequent encounter (02/21/25), cerebral infarction, Type II diabetes, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, seizures, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/18/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating Resident #9 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #9 was dependent on staff for toilet use, transfers, and bathing. Resident #9 received a mechanically altered therapeutic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to submit required staffing information. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter Four of 2024 (July 1 - September 30) revealed the facility triggered for failure to submit data for the quarter. Interview on 04/03/25 at 11:48 A.M. with the Administrator verified the PBJ data was not submitted for Quarter Four of 2024 (July 1- September 30). The Administrator reported Human Resources (HR) was responsible for submitting the data and it was not done. The Administrator stated she did not know why the data was not submitted as required. The Administrator provided a copy of the updated policy and reported she submitted the data for the quarter including the months of October, November, and December 2024. Review of the facility policy titled, PBJ Protocol, revised 11/19/24, revealed staffing data was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, Power of Attorney (POA) interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received feeding assistance and scheduled showers. This affected four (#1, #6, #10, and #9) of 14 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, stage III chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, and chronic embolism and thrombosis deep veins of lower extremity. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/25, revealed Resident #1 was assessed with intact cognition and was dependent on staff for the completion of ADLs. Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, received scheduled pain medication, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure discharge instructions were provided at the time of discharge from the facility. This affected one (#3) of five residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/16/24. Diagnoses included acute cystitis, Type II diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, cerebral infarction, dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, hypertension, depression, chronic ischemic heart disease, and non-pressure chronic ulcer to the right heel. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/22/24, revealed Resident #3 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), utilized a wheelchair for mobility and was propelled by staff, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely repositioning and offloading was provided to dependent residents to assist in the prevention of pressure ulcers. This affected three (#1, #4, #10) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, stage III chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, and chronic embolism and thrombosis deep veins of lower extremity. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/25, revealed Resident #1 was assessed with intact cognition and was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living (ADLs), including transfer and bed mobility. Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, received scheduled pain medication, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided. This affected three (#1, #4, and #10) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure sufficient catheter care or physician orders regarding the maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #1. This affected one (#1) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified six residents with indwelling catheters. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, stage III chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, and chronic embolism and thrombosis deep veins of lower extremity. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/25, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration per physician order. This affected one (#1) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, stage III chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, and chronic embolism and thrombosis deep veins of lower extremity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/25, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of bowel and bladder, received scheduled pain medication, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown. Review of the plan of care, dated 12/21/24, revealed Resident #1 had chronic pain related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the pharmacy delivery manifest, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained and administered as ordered by the prescribing physician, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#7) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/24. Diagnoses included anemia, cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, Type II diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic viral hepatitis C, facial weakness, and vitamin d deficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/23/25, revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, required partial to moderate staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no fall history, no known weight loss, received a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered meal textures were served to residents. This affected one (#5) of four residents reviewed for meal textures. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/18/21. Diagnoses included psychosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD), major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hallucinations, morbid obesity, and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/02/25, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #5 was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers, required set up assistance for eating and received a mechanically altered therapeutic diet. Review of the care plan, revised 03/04/25, revealed Resident #5 had a self-care deficit, had impaired cognitive function, was at risk for pain, and was at nutrition and hydration risk. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff applied personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing high contact care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (#1) of one resident reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, stage III chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, and chronic embolism and thrombosis deep veins of lower extremity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/25, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of bowel and bladder, received scheduled pain medication, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown. Review of a physician order dated 03/18/25 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were prepared a safe and orderly discharge. This affected Residents #8 and #9 reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of Former Resident (FR) #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/11/24 and was discharged to home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included left femur fracture, atrial fibrillation, and dementia. Review of FR #8's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. The resident required moderate assistance with toileting, shower/bathing, lower body dressing, chair to bed transfers, toilet transfer, and walking up to 50 feet. Review of FR #8's care plan revealed she required assistance with discharge planning for a home goal and to arrange outside services and equipment needs prior to discharge. Review of FR #8's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revealed an end of service date of 12/29/24. The resident denied an appeal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of shower schedules, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with scheduled bathing. This affected three (#9, #50, and #68) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 01/06/23. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, oral dysphagia, stage three chronic kidney disease, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, anorexia, anxiety disorder, dementia, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/05/24, revealed Resident #9 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent for showering and bathing, and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Review of a facility shower schedule revealed Resident #9 was scheduled for showers every Wednesday and Saturday on second shift. Review of Resident #9's shower documentation for 07/10/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a sanitary manner. This affected four residents (#50, #54, #19, #11) and had the potential to affect all residents who were receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 67. Findings include Observation on 06/11/24 at 11:35 A.M., of meal plating revealed [NAME] #446 was wearing gloves and directly touched the hamburger buns, lettuce, and tomatoes then touched the plates, counter, scoop handles, tongs and bag containing hamburger buns. The cook then again directly touched the hamburger buns, lettuce, and tomato with the same gloved hands. [NAME] #446 repeated this process four times while plating meals for four residents (#50, #54, #19, #11). After surveyor intervention, [NAME] #446 changed his gloves but completed no hand washing, then used tongs for the hamburger buns, lettuce, and tomato. Interview on 06/11/14 at 11:35 A.M., [NAME] #446 verified he was touching the serving handles, plates, and counter then touching the food directly with the same gloved hands.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place and chemicals with a precautionary label were secured. This affected two (#23 and #42) of two residents reviewed for accidents. This had the potential to affect three facility-identified independently ambulatory but cognitively impaired residents (#18, #56, and #60) who resided in the building. The facility census was 67 Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/06/19. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction right dominate side, need for assistance with personal care, abnormal posture, vascular dementia, hypertension. hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, and right elbow contracture. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed [NAME] resident was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS data revealed Resident #23 was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were properly labeled and expired medications were not available for use past the expiration date. This affected two medication rooms (C-Hall and B-Hall) and one medication cart (C-Hall). The facility census was 67. Findings include: Observation of the C-Hall medication storage room on 06/12/24 at 8:01 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed two expired blister cards of benzonate 100 milligram (mg) capsules. The first blister card contained three benzonate 100 mg capsules and was marked with an expiration date of 03/28/23. The second blister card contained twenty-nine benzonate 100 mg capsules and was marked with an expiration date of 05/12/24. Further observation of the C-Hall medication storage room revealed ipratropium 0.03% nasal solution with an expiration date of 02/28/23. Interview with the DON at the time of observation verified both blister cards of benzonate and the ipratropium 0.03% nasal solution were expired. Observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity/respect when staff failed to cover the drainage bag of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (Resident #13) of five residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 12/13/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), need for assistance with personal care, hypertension (HTN), obstructive and reflux uropathy, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), chronic kidney disease (CKD), major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/21/24, revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and was always incontinent of bowel. Observation on 06/11/24 at 7:41 A.M. revealed Resident #13 had an uncovered indwelling catheter drainage bag hanging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure access to the call light for one dependent resident (Resident #27) reviewed for call lights in reach. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 03/24/24. Diagnoses included of metabolic encephalopathy, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and hydrocephalus. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was dependent for shower/bathing, personal hygiene, and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 06/10/24 at 11:47 A.M. revealed Resident #27 was laying in bed on their back with their call light tied to the right bedrail and hanging down from the bedrail toward the floor, inaccessible to the resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Pre admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) forms were completed for a change of condition in mental health diagnosis. This affected one(#34) of two residents reviewed for PASARR compliance. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/15/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, hallucinations, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Resident #34's schizoaffective disorder diagnosis was added 07/07/23. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/24, revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Resident #34 was taking a scheduled antipsychotic at the time of the review. Resident #34 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #34's care plan, revised 03/21/24, revealed supports and interventions for impaired cognitive function,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to include the use of a psychotropic medication for depression in the resident's comprehensive care plan. This affected one (#67) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 67. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 05/15/24. Diagnoses included systolic depressive disorder and anxiety. Review of a physician order dated 05/16/24 revealed the resident had an order for Zoloft 100 milligrams (mg) daily for depression. Review of the care plan for Resident #67 revealed there was no care plan in place for the use of a psychotropic medication for depression. Interview on 06/11/24 at 8:02 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #495 verified there was no plan of care in place for Resident #67's use of the psychotropic medication Zoloft for depression. Review of the policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 10/24/22, revealed the comprehensive care plan would include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were included in the development for their plan of care and failed to have care planning meetings to periodically review the care plan. This affected two (#39 and #67) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 02/09/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, heart failure, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/24, revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Resident #39 required set up assistance with eating and was dependent on staff for toilet use, bathing and dressing. Resident #39 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #39's current care plan, revised 01/29/24, revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with scheduled grooming and bathing. This affected three (#7, #23, and #273) of seventeen residents observed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following subarachnoid hemorrhage, cirrhosis of liver, anxiety disorder, major depression, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, and non-pressure chronic ulcer to right and left foot. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/25/24, revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition. Resident #7 required assistance with activities of daily living, was incontinent of urine and continent of bowel. Review of the plan of care revealed on 06/26/23 the care plan was revised to address Resident #7's activity of daily living self care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored for bowel movements and interventions for constipation were implemented as ordered. This affected three (#52, #23 and #30) of four residents reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 67. Finding include: 1. Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, polyneuropathy, and insomnia. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 05/20/24, revealed Resident #52 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #52 was dependent on staff for toilet use and bathing. Resident #52 had hallucinations, delusions, and displayed rejection of care behaviors one to three days during the review period. Review of Resident #52's care plan, revised 05/20/24, revealed supports and interventions for use of psychoactive medications with risk for constipation, urinary and bowel incontinence and risk for constipation due to decreased mobility. Interventions for constipation included encourage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the audiologist and optometrist were followed. This affected one (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for vision and/or hearing. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 05/18/21. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, cognitive communication deficit, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and hallucinations. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/27/24, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS data revealed Resident #30's vision was adequate with corrective lenses and the hearing was not evaluated. Review of the care plan for Resident #30 revealed the facility will arrange consultation with eye care practitioner as required. Review of the optometry visit dated 10/19/22 revealed the resident complained of blurred vision to both eyes. The resident was identified with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer guidelines, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough wound assessment was completed and failed to provide appropriate pressure reducing devices. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 67. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 had an admission date of 06/09/24. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, hypertension, dementia, and a pressure ulcer of the left buttock stage four. Review of the admission physician orders dated 06/09/24 revealed there were no orders for pressure reducing devices Review of the admission assessment completed on 06/09/24 at 5:16 P.M. noted the resident had a stage four pressure ulcer. There were no wound measurements or description of the wound documented. Review of a skin one-time observation tool, dated 06/10/24 at 4:02 P.M., revealed the resident had a stage four pressure ulcer to the left buttock measuring one centimeter (cm) in length by one cm in width by 1.6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain orders for the use and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to provide proper urinary catheter cleansing. This affected one (#64) of one sampled residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in a facility census of 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included left radius fracture, arthrodesis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, age related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, chronic kidney disease, anemia, hypertension, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, colostomy, and stenosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #64 with intact cognition and utilized an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the care plan dated 12/11/23 addressed Resident #64's indwelling urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder. Goals included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sliding scale insulin was provided as ordered for one (#34) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67. Finding include: 1. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/15/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, hallucinations, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Review the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/24, revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Resident #34 received insulin injections seven days during the review period. Resident #34 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Resident #34 required extensive assistance with bed mobility. Resident #34 was dependent on staff for toileting, and parts of dressing. Resident #34 required maximum assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #34's physician orders revealed an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory (lab) testing was completed as indicated. This affected one resident (#35) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/18. Diagnoses included dementia, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, psychosis, seizures, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of Resident #35's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/12/21 for divalproex sodium (Depakote) tablet delayed release 250 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to seizures. An order dated 08/22/22 instructed to obtain valproic acid levels every six months due to Depakote drug therapy starting on 22nd. Review of Resident #35's laboratory (lab) results found no lab results for Resident #35's valproic acid levels. Review of Resident #35's 05/10/24 psychiatric note revealed Resident #35's labs were reviewed. There was no indication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide dental services to meet the residents needs. This affected one resident (#30) of one resident reviewed for dental. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 05/18/21. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), hallucinations, osteoporosis, insomnia, intervertebral disc degeneration, spondylosis, spinal stenosis, hypertension (HTN), low back pain, cellulitis of right lower limb, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan for Resident #30 revealed they are at risk for oral/dental health problems related to many missing teeth. The facility will coordinate arrangements for dental care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food provided to residents was palatable and attractive. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 02/09/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, heart failure, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Resident #39 required set up assistance with eating. Review of Resident #39's care plan, revised 01/29/24, revealed supports and interventions for nutritional risk. Interview on 06/10/24 at 9:29 A.M. with Resident #39 reported her bacon was undercooked this morning and her food items were often not cooked well enough and cold. Observation on 06/10/24 at 12:34 P.M. of Resident #39's lunch tray found her to have been provided pizza with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility medical records, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents received influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. This affected two (#13 and #43) of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations in a facility with a census of 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 12/13/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs, generalized muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Review of facility immunization consent records revealed the facility obtained verbal consent from Resident #13 on 11/29/23 for the pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility medical records, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received COVID-19 immunizations. This affected one (Resident #13) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations in a facility with a census of 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 12/13/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs, generalized muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Review of facility immunization consent records revealed the facility obtained verbal consent from Resident #13 on 11/29/23 for the COVID-19 immunization, but there was no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of maintenance repair records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all portions of resident call devices were functioning properly. This affected one resident (#58) of eight residents reviewed on the C Hall. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/01/23. Diagnoses included heart failure, cirrhosis of the liver, severe protein calories malnutrition, edema, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #58 was dependent on staff for toilet use, bathing, and transfer. Resident #58 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #58's care plan revised 03/14/24 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit, risk for pain, risk for falls, and bowel and bladder incontinence. Interview on 06/10/24 at 9:54 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical resident interview, staff interview, review of shower schedules and shower documentation, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were showered as scheduled. This affected one (#70) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 03/03/24 with diagnoses of subarachnoid hemorrhage and assistance needed for personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 required moderate assistance with showering. Review of the care plan dated 03/08/24 for Resident #70 revealed she had an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit related to subarachnoid hemorrhage and required staff assistance with showering. Review of the shower schedule for Resident #70 revealed she was to have a shower on first shift on Wednesdays and Sundays. Review of the shower sheets for Resident #70 revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, family and resident interviews, medical record review, review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, review of the facility assessment, and review of the staffing schedules, the facility failed to maintain staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents. This affected three residents (#8, #23 and #72) of four residents reviewed for showers and had the potential to affect all 74 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 08/10/23 revealed an average daily census of 72 to 78 residents. Staffing to ensure resident care included one nurse to twenty-six residents and one state tested nursing aide (STNA) for every twelve residents for the night shift. Review of the staffing on 03/03/24 from 10:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. on 03/04/24 revealed three nurses and two STNA for a census of 74. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes from 12/04/23 and 01/03/24 revealed there were resident concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living were provided showers as scheduled. This affected three (#8, #23 and #72) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 74. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 02/22/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia and diabetes mellitus type II. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had moderate cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance from staff for showers and bathing. Review of the care plan dated 03/03/24 revealed Resident #8 had an activities of daily living self care deficit and required assistance with bathing. The identified goal for Resident #8 was to improve in all areas of activities of daily living self performance. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care to residents. This affected two (Residents #16 and #69) of three residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 02/10/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and periprosthetic fracture around other internal prosthetic joint. Review of the care plan dated 02/02/24 revealed Resident #16 experienced a performance deficit related to activities of daily living, and was incontinent of urine and bowel. Interventions included assistance with personal care as needed, the use of disposable briefs and cleansing of the perineum after each episode of incontinence. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had moderate cognitive impairment, required substantial assistance for toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate which exceeded five percent. 25 opportunities were observed with two medication errors, resulting in 8.0 percent error rate. This affected one (Resident #51) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type II, and vascular dementia. Review of the care plan dated 04/27/21 and last revised on 07/25/23 revealed Resident #51 had diabetes and interventions included for diabetes medication to be administered as ordered. Resident #51 also had a care plan dated 10/27/20 with a revision date of 07/25/23 for congestive heart failure. Interventions included for cardiac medications to be administered as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for residents. This affected two residents (#11 and #17) of ten residents reviewed for call light placement. The Facility census was 76. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/12/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, hypertension, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/16/23, revealed Resident #11 had cognitive impairment, was total dependence of two staff for bed mobility and personal hygiene and had no functional limitations of the upper extremities. Observation on 12/11/23 at 9:00 A.M. of Resident #11 revealed the call light cord was hanging from the reset box in the room at the foot of the resident's bed and outside the reach of the resident. Concurrent interview with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided feeding assistance with meals. This affected two Residents (#17 and #21) of three residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility identified eleven residents that required feeding assistance. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 03/09/23. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy. mild protein calorie malnutrition, end stage renal disease, dysphagia, dementia, and impaired visual loss. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/03/23, revealed Resident #17 was moderately cognitively impaired, was highly impaired visually with object identification in question, required set up with meals to ensure awareness of what food was served, the location on the plate and to provide eating utensils. Review of the care plan dated 03/09/23 revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of a community referral form, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete assessments on new admission to timely meet residents needs. This affected one (#87) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 11/16/23 at 5:02 P.M. and a discharge date of 11/16/23 with a time of 7:03 P.M. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis of right hip, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux, and obesity. Resident #87 had a right hip replacement on 11/15/23 and was being admitted to the facility for therapy to improve balance, strength, and endurance prior to returning home. Plan for services were needed for less than 30 days. Review of the community referral form dated 11/16/23 and timed 1:03 P.M. revealed Resident #87 was ordered to receive aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) once a day, extra strength Tylenol 1000 mg every eight hours as needed for pain for 14 days, celecoxib 200 mg once daily for 14 days, vitamin D3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the manufacturer's recommendations and review of the facility policy on insulin administration, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered as ordered. This affected one (#7) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/06/20. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #7 revealed an order dated 10/05/22 for 26 units of insulin glargine to be injected subcutaneously one time a day using a Basaglar Kwik pen Solution Pen-Injector 100 units per milliliter (ml). Observation on 12/11/23 at 9:10 A.M. of insulin administration for Resident #7 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #558 revealed LPN #558 removed an insulin pen from the top drawer of the medication cart, followed by pen needle and alcohol wipes. LPN #558 closed the drawer, removed the cap from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a functional call light system. This affected one (#11) of ten residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, hypertension, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 had cognitive impairment, required total dependence of two staff for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and had no functional limitations of the upper extremities. Observations on [DATE] at 8:00 A.M. and from 10:20 A.M. to 10:45 A.M., when care was being provided by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #587, revealed the call light alert outside Resident #11's room was lit. Interview on [DATE] at 10:45 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living received showers/bed baths as scheduled. This affected two (#10 and #13) of three residents reviewed for hygiene. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spinal stenosis, and age related osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/08/23, revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Resident #13 required staff assistance with bathing. Review of the care plan, revised 02/14/23, revealed Resident #13 had activities of self care performance deficit and interventions included the resident was dependent on staff for showers. Review of the shower sheets, dated 09/04/23 to 10/04/23, revealed Resident #13 had three documented bed baths in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected of thee (#10, #13, and #21) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation on 10/04/23 at 8:55 A.M. of Resident #10's room revealed the bathroom floor was stained and dirty, the blinds covering the large window near the bed had splatters of possibly food or drink and were covered with a thick dust, the valance above the window had a think layer of dust, and the wall vent had a thick layer of dust. Interview on 10/04/23 at 8:59 P.M. with Resident #10 revealed his room was not cleaned well and pointed to the window blinds. Resident #10 stated the bathroom floor was always dirty. Interview on 10/04/23 at 9:11 A.M. with Housekeeping #201 verified Resident #10's bathroom floor, blinds, window valance, and vent were not appropriately clean. Interview on 10/04/23 at 10:38 A.M. with Resident #13 revealed the carpet in her room was stained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-16 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, the facility failed to verify residents with a trust fund account received quarterly bank statements. This affected 37 (#6, #8, #9, #10, #12, #15, #16, #17, #18, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #39, #40, #43, #44, #50, #51, #53, #57, #64, #65, #66, #67, #69, and #71) of 37 residents with a resident trust fund account. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Interview on 06/16/22 at 11:05 A.M., with the Business Office Manager #438 revealed she could not verify the facility had provided quarterly statements to residents or their representatives who had trust fund accounts with the facility. Further interview revealed the facility had 37 (#6, #8, #9, #10, #12, #15, #16, #17, #18, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #39, #40, #43, #44, #50, #51, #53, #57, #64, #65, #66, #67, #69, and #71) residents with a trust fund account. Review of the undated facility documented titled, Authorization to Manage Resident Trust Fund revealed residents with an account…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper care and treatment to improve maintain hearing abilities. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for communication. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 03/07/19, with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 04/11/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of MDS assessments dated 06/11/19, 09/04/19, 11/07/19, 02/14/20, 04/10/20, 07/03/20, 10/02/20, 04/08/21, 07/08/21, 08/27/21, 10/15/21, 01/12/22, and 04/11/22 revealed the resident had moderate difficulty with hearing and did not have hearing aids. MDS assessments dated 12/13/20 and 01/18/21 indicated the resident's hearing was highly impaired and the resident had no hearing aids. Review of hospital documentation with a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was turned and repositioned every two hours per the plan of care to prevent skin breakdown. This affected one (#6) of one resident reviewed for turning/repositioning to prevent skin breakdown. The facility identified three current residents with pressure sores and 61 residents receiving preventive skin care. Facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record reviewed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, anxiety, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required the extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility. The resident was noted to be cooperative with care. Review of the pressure sore risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at high risk for development of pressure sores. Review of Resident #6's plan of care dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, family and staff interview, review of safety data sheets, and review of the safety manual, the facility failed to securely store hazardous materials. This affected one (Resident #46) of two facility identified independently mobile, cognitively impaired residents. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 10/06/21, with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of colon, dementia, and intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one person for transfers and walking. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 06/17/21, with diagnoses of cardiomegaly, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. Observation on 06/13/22 at 11:05 A.M., revealed bottles of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the proper psychiatric diagnoses was in the medical record for a resident receiving anti-psychotic medications. This affected one (#75) of five residents reviewed for anti-psychotic medications. The facility identified 13 residents utilizing antipsychotic. The current census is 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses include: dementia, encephalopathy, muscle weakness, falls, anxiety and depression. Review of Resident #75's comprehensive Minimum Data Set, (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident impaired cognition, was a 1-2 person assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and was receiving antipsychotics. Per the MDS assessment the resident has non-Alzheimer's dementia. No psychosis diagnoses was noted in the assessment. Per the MDS dated [DATE], the resident was not diagnosed with bipolar, psychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medications were secured during medications administration for residents. This affected two (#5 and #18) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The current census is 70. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/13/19, with diagnoses including: heart failure, hypertension, depression, and ischemic heart failure. Review of Resident #18's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was a set up for ADLs. Review of Resident #18's care plans dated 05/2019 revealed a focus for an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance related to heart failure and receiving hospice services. Interventions include praise efforts for self-care, provide care for ADLs and monitor for changes. Review of Resident #18's physician prescribed medications revealed all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-07-25 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee personnel files, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure state tested nursing assistants (STNA) had performance evaluations completed every 12 months. This affected five STNA's (#112, #122, #139, #150 and #151) of 10 nurse aide employee files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #150's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 04/11/18. STNA #150's annual evaluation had not been completed in April 2019. 2. Review of STNA #151's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 04/05/18. STNA #151's annual evaluation had not been completed in April 2019. 3. Review of STNA #139's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 04/03/78. STNA #139's annual evaluation had not been completed in April 2019. 4. Review of STNA #122's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 05/31/17. STNA #122's annual evaluation had not been completed in May 2019. 5. Review of STNA #112's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 02/25/15. STNA #112's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility infection control data log and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure urinary and colostomy collection devices were properly stored. This affected five (#31, #190, #44, #88, #53) of six residents who had urinary/colostomy collection devices in their rooms and not covered. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents who reside in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a proper infection control monitoring system was in place. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/24/19 between 10:45 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. of Residents (#31, #44, #53, #88, #190) bathrooms revealed urinary catheter collection devices were on the back of the toilets uncovered with no barrier on the bottom of the collection devices. In addition, Resident #31 also had a colostomy collection device sitting on the back of the toilet uncovered with no barrier in place. Interview on 07/24/19 at 11:00 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #300 verified Residents #31, #44, #53, #88 and #190's collection devices were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a dignified manner. This affected 16 (#9, #70, #5, #90, #86, #29, #85, #4, #3, #46, #64, #32, #16, #42, #2 and #25) of 16 residents who received meals in the main dining room. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Observation of the lunch meal on 07/22/19 between 12:15 P.M. and 12:45 P.M. revealed 16 (#9, #70, #5, #90, #86, #29, #85, #4, #3, #46, #64, #32, #16, #42, #2 and #25) residents were seated at 12 tables. On 07/22/19 at 12:30 P.M. the first resident meal was served in the dining room, Resident #42 was served first. There was one other resident (#16) at his table at that time who was not offered their lunch tray. Staff were then observed to serve Resident #32 who was seated at another table. Staff were then observed to skip the second resident at that table (Resident #64) and went to Resident #46 who was at another table with three additional residents (#3, #85, #4). These three residents were skipped and staff served Resident #70 at another table. Two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when they were opened. This affected four resident's (#7, #40, #64, #390) of 30 resident's whom resided on the B hall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff observed residents during medication administration to ensure the resident took/consumed their medication. This affected two residents' (#15 and #190) of six residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed the resident had an active order, dated 06/04/19, for Advair Diskus (bronchodilator used to treat asthma and chronic bronchitis, including COPD associated with chronic bronchitis) one puff by inhalation twice a day for COPD. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as desired. This affected one (#11) out of four residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, muscle weakness, lymphedema, hypertension, dizziness and giddiness, anxiety disorder, obesity, insomnia, radiculopathy of cervical region, anemia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Resident #11 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #11 required limited assistance with walking, and locomotion. Resident #11 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, resident, family and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and responsible parties were provided a written notice of transfer upon discharge from the facility to a hospital. This affected two (#37 and #53) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility identified six residents discharged from the facility to acute care facilities. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hemiplegia affecting left side, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, lymphedema, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis and epidermal cyst. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of progress notes dated 03/27/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, family and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and responsible parties were provided a bed hold policy upon discharge from the facility to a hospital. This affected two (#37 and #53) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility identified six residents discharged from the facility to acute care facilities. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hemiplegia affecting left side, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, lymphedema, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis and epidermal cyst. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of progress notes dated 03/27/19 at 4:45 A.M. revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident and family interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide oral care to a resident. This affected one resident (#37) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified 24 residents who required assistance with oral care. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hemiplegia affecting left side, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, lymphedema, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis and epidermal cyst. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. The resident did not refuse care. Review of the resident's plan of care revealed the resident required assistance with personal hygiene. Review of State Tested Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a resident's skin treatment. This affected one (#15) of five residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included neoplasm of unspecified bone, soft tissue and skin, malignant neoplasm of the prostate and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/13/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident did not have any wounds. Review of a Skin Observation Tool, dated 07/08/19, revealed the resident had a tumor on the front of his left lower leg that measures approximately one centimeter long by one centimeter wide. The wound was not open. The resident had his own bandage on the tumor site. The nurse removed the dressing, cleaned the site and covered it with a foam bandage.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering as needed psychotropic medications. Additionally, the failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days. This affected two residents (#52 and #87) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #52 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Diabetes mellitus, heart failure and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 06/14/19, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the the resident's physician orders revealed the resident had an active order dated 12/10/18 for Alprazolam 0.5 milligrams (anti-anxiety medication) to be administered as needed (PRN) up to three times a day. The record review revealed no documentation was found regarding if the Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$337,580 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $337,580 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-01 for 26 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI LIVING COMMUNITIES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2000 |
| COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2014 |
| IFFLAND, ALISA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2017 |
| LIPSEY, PRENTICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| MBANU, TERIKA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/05/2024 |
| MELFI, MITCH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/23/2016 |
| REHMER, HEATHER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2024 |
| CECIL, CAITLIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/18/2012 |
| FINN, CHRISTINA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| GRUBBS, STACEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2012 |
| HAZARD, TED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2017 |
| MUNROE, KYLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2015 |
| MURRIEL, SHELLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| NAGEL, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/12/2015 |
| SNODGRASS, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2016 |
| WINE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| BOEHME, LAURIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/02/2021 |
| HACKETT, DIONNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| HOWARD, CASEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| LONGHIN-HOWARD, JOAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2007 |
| MCFARLAND, DIANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2023 |
| MCKINNEY, MARISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/20/2021 |
| TYLER, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/28/1977 |
| CONCEPT REHAB, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2015 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2019 |
| ICP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| SYLVANIA FRANCISCAN HEALTH | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2014 |
| ULRICHPINCIOTTI DESIGN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2011 |
| HUFDHI, RAIED | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/25/2025 |
| LUCAS, GINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2024 |
| STEVENSON, CASSIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $539K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365907. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.