No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bruceville Terrace - D/P SNF Of Methodist Hospital

8151 Bruceville Road, Sacramento, CA 95823 · Non profit - Corporation · 171 certified beds · (916) 423-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (18% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7601 Hospital Dr · (916) 689-1966 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Foods Co.0.5 mi
7421 W Stockton Blvd · (916) 688-3343 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wood Park0.3 mi
6755 Bodine Cir · (916) 808-5011 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8355 Arroyo Vista Dr · (916) 912-9185

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers12.6%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.3%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.372.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.191.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 352 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.8%CMS range 55.6–65.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 9.4–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified54.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 4.1–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.31
RN hoursweekends
18.3%
Total nursing turnover
25.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 164.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.84 to 1.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-27)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse, when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 multiple times.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including depression (a serious mood disorder that causes persistent sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest in activities), failure to thrive (a complex syndrome of progressive physical, cognitive, and functional decline), and muscle weakness (lack of physical strength where your muscles cannot generate required force for normal movement). A review of an admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including sequelae of cerebral infarct (the residual neurological and functional deficits that persist after the brain's blood supply is blocked) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food serve safety when:Staff did not clean two ice machines located in the hospital's main kitchen and the skilled nursing facility.Staff did not maintain several pieces of cookware in usable condition.Staff left opened packaged and prepared food items in the walk in refrigerator and dry storage area without required labels and dates.The metal coating of the can opener blade was worn off.Dietary staff did not follow proper refrigerator thawing procedures that allowed identification of when food was pulled from the freezer and when it should be used.Two cooks used masks instead of proper beard restraints and did not fully cover facial hair.One Nutrition Assistant (NA) could not verbalize the correct process for manual dishwashing using the 3 compartment sink.These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness and placed 155 of 163…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person centered care plan for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 163 and 106), when:The facility placed Resident 163 on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control intervention used to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms through targeted gown and glove use) and not initiate a care plan.Resident 106's care plan for EBP and for the use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line- a long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein, typically in the upper arm, and threaded to a central vein above the heart, and is used for long-term intravenous treatments such as antibiotics) were not developed.These failures had the risks for Resident 163 and Resident 106 not to receive appropriate and needed care and have the potential for Resident 163 and 106 not to achieve their highest practicable well-being.Findings: During a review of Resident 163's clinical record, Resident 163 was admitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure biologicals were stored in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P), and accepted professional principles for a census of 163 when 11 packets of expired food thickeners (specialized powders or gels that instantly increase the viscosity of hot or cold liquids and foods primarily designed to achieve safe, consistent textures for individuals with difficulty swallowing) were found stored in D station medication cart 1.This failure created the potential for residents to receive biologicals that were expired or with unsafe or reduced potency which could have caused unwanted effects to the residents. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview that began on 5/5/26 at 1:15 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, of the D station medication cart 1, 11 packets of expired food thickeners were found stored in the medication cart. LN 2 confirmed the finding and stated that expired food thickeners should not be stored in medication carts. LN 2 also stated they use food thickeners to thicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 163 when;1.A facility staff did not wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) when accessing and using the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line- a type of central line which is inserted into a large vein, typically in the upper arm, and threaded to a central vein above the heart, and is used for long-term intravenous treatments such as antibiotics) of Resident 130 who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- also known as enhanced standard precaution/ESP, infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs- bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic] that employs targeted gown and glove use);2.The facility did not communicate which residents were on EBP to all staff, and there was no EBP order for Resident 163; and,3. One glucometer (blood sugar monitor device…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff delivered intravenous (IV) therapy (administration of fluids or medications into the vein) was consistent with standards of practice and the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for one out of 35 sampled residents (Resident 106) when Resident 106's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line- a long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein, typically in the upper arm, and threaded to a vein above the heart, and is used for long-term intravenous treatments such as antibiotics) hub (the external plastic junction connecting the catheter to extension tubes) was not scrubbed with antiseptic pad before use.This failure created the potential for unsafe IV therapy delivery, possible infection, and prevented Resident 106 from achieving the highest practicable well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 106's clinical record indicated Resident 106 was previously admitted in June of 2020 and had diagnoses that included neutropenia (condition characterized by an abnormally low count of white blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices were followed when the facility's medication error rate was more than 5% (percentage- number or ratio that expressed as a fraction of 100) for a resident census of 163. Medication administration observations were conducted over multiple days, at varied times, in random locations throughout the facility. The facility had a total of two errors out of 30 opportunities which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 6.67% in one out of 9 residents (Resident 125) observed for medication administration.These failures had the potential for unsafe and ineffective medication therapy of Resident 125 and had the potential to negatively affect the residents' medical conditions.Findings:During a medication administration observation which started on 5/5/26 at 10:41 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 5, LN 5 administered a total of five pills to Resident 125 which included 1 capsule of docusate sodium (a medication utilized for managing and treating infrequent or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report the results of an abuse investigation to the state survey agency (California Department of Public Health, CDPH) within 5 working days of the incident (allegation of abuse dated 2/1/26). This failure resulted in CDPH being unaware of the outcome of the abuse investigation, and had the potential for the abuse investigation to not be investigated thoroughly.A review of the facility's admission documents indicated Resident 1 and Resident 2 were admitted in February 2026.During a review of document titled Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (a California mandated reporter document used to report suspected abuse or neglect of seniors (65+) or dependent adults (18-64 with disabilities)) dated 2/1/26, indicated an allegation of abuse was reported to CDPH. Form indicated, alleged victim was Resident 1, and the alleged abuser was Resident 2. Form indicated, Reported types of abuse (Check all that apply): Physical.During an interview on 2/20/26, at 10:15 a.m., with Nursing Manager (NM), NM stated, we did not send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) Responsible Party (RP) of Resident 1's fall in the facility.This deficient practice resulted in RP 1 being unaware of Resident 1's fall and actual condition that may impact RP 1's ability to ensure appropriate care and support following discharge. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's facesheet (a page of the chart that contains a summary of resident's basic information), the facesheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure).During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note (NPN), dated 11/23/25 at 2:51 a.m., the NPN indicated, Resident 1 had lost his balance while returning to bed, and a certified nursing assistant (CNA) assisted him to sit on the floor. At 1 a.m., Resident 1 was noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to be notified of room change, when the facility did not provide written notice for room change including reasons for the room change for Resident 1.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving a written explanation of why the move was required, resulting in Resident 1 expressing sadness and frustration.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (condition in which the kidneys no longer function normally), septic shock (life-threatening condition that occurs when sepsis, a body's extreme response to an infection, leads to dangerously low blood pressure and organ damage), and bilateral lower extremity (both legs) cellulitis (serious deep infection of the skin). Resident 1's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/12/25, indicated moderate cognitive impairment.During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect and dignity when Resident 1's request to have family present during direct care was not acknowledged by Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not to receive care based on her needs and preferences. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in Middle 2025 with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition where your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't properly use the insulin it produces, leading to high blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/22/25 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tests cognition) score of 13 out of 15 indicating Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's care plan, titled .Alteration in Communication r/t [sic, related to] language barrier. dated 7/16/25, indicated, . Language(s) spoken: Spanish . The box next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of four sampled residents (Resident 1's) skin for stageable pressure injuries (damage to the skin and underlying tissues caused by prolonged pressure on the body). This failure had the potential to result in worsening of Resident 1's skin breakdown.A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in Middle 2025 with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition where your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't properly use the insulin it produces, leading to high blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/22/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tests cognition) score of 13 out of 15 indicating Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During a review of Resident 1's initial skin assessment dated [DATE], the skin assessment indicated excoriation (skin damage) on sacral coccyx…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during wound care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when licensed staff did not perform hand hygiene between changing gloves when performing wound care. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination of the wound and spread of infection for Resident 2. A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated resident 2 was admitted in July 2025 with diagnoses which included pressure injury (pressure sore, ulcer, or bedsore) of sacral (a triangular bone at the base of the spine) region. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 5/27/25 indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tests cognition) score of 0 out of 15 indicating Resident 2 had severely impaired cognition. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record, the physician treatment order dated 7/11/25 indicated, . Pressure injury Stage 4 [severe, deep wound that extends through the skin, fat, and muscle,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when he was pushed by Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling backward and striking the back of his head and right elbow on the floor. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/1/25, indicated Resident 2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a brief screening that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score was 14 which indicated he was cognitively intact and as having no delirium or behavioral symptoms. Review of the facility's investigation report indicated Resident 2 was interviewed by the facility's Medical Social Worker (MSW) on 7/3/25. The investigation report indicated, According to the patient (Resident 2), an argument began because he believed his roommate had taken his grabber, which the roommate denies. The patient (Resident 2) acknowledged that, while his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy and confidentiality for 3 of 48 sampled residents (Resident 133, Resident 141, and Resident 314) when the Licensed Nurse (LN) left worksheets containing residents' identifiable health care information exposed to view during medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 133, Resident 141, and Resident 314's confidential information to be viewed by unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: A review of Resident 133's Facesheet indicated Resident 133 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular and very rapid heart rhythm) and cellulitis (skin infection). A review of Resident 141's Facesheet indicated Resident 141 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis of alcohol induced neuropathy (chronic alcohol abuse damages the nerves leading to sensory and motor dysfunction). A review of Resident 314's Facesheet indicated Resident 314 was admitted to the facility in February 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to conserve nutritive value and palatability for residents receiving a pureed diet when the pureed carrots were prepared without using a recipe. This failure had the potential of leading to poor intake and malnutrition for the residents receiving pureed meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview, and recipe review on 2/25/25 at 9:45 a.m., in the food preparation area, with the Nutrition Service Worker 1-Cook (NSW 1-C), Lead [NAME] for the day, and Nutrition Service Worker 2- Trainee [NAME] (NSW 2-TC) 2), NSW 1-C was showing the puree recipes and discussed the options used for adjusting the texture of pureed dishes. NSW 1-C had stated using water is seldom used as well as thickener ingredients. NSW 2-TC was observed liberally pouring an unmeasured amount of hot water into both the carrot puree and sweet potato puree. Observed NSW 1-C attempting to remedy the very watery and runny textured purees by adding an unmeasured volume of puree thickening ingredient.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Food items in refrigerator, freezer, and dry food storage had food items that were not securely closed, did not have expiration date labels, or no label with opened date and use by date labels; 2. Clean stainless steel table pans were found stacked and stored wet on storage shelves; and 3. Two red cutting boards for meat and 1 green cutting board for vegetables had deep grooves. Theses failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness for 159 residents who are eating facility prepared foods. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 2/24/2025, at 9 a.m., with the Nutrition Service Manager (NSM), the following was observed: The South walk-in Veg Box #2 refrigerator contained an open bag of spinach that had cellophane loosely wrapped around the spinach bag. An opened bag of shredded cheddar cheese with cellophane…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 32) was administered pain medication before providing wound care. This failure resulted in Resident 32 having unnecessary pain during wound care. Findings: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in mid-2024 with diagnoses which included stroke, hypertension (uncontrolled blood pressure), dementia (memory loss) and a stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone). A review of Resident 32's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/29/24, indicated Resident 32's memory was severely impaired. During an observation on 2/27/25 at 8:41 a.m., in Resident 32's room, Resident 32 wound dressing change was being provided by the Wound Care Registered Nurse (WCRN). Resident 32 stated, this is painful. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 8:42 a.m., with Resident 32, Resident 32 stated, She [WCRN] never asked about pain. Yes, I have pain, this does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained for one (Resident 32) of 48 sampled Residents when: 1. Resident 32's room, with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (wearing gowns and gloves during close-contact care activities with residents with open wounds or medical devices to stop the spread of tough-to-treat infections), trash bin did not have a lid and was overflowing with used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - items, such as gowns and gloves, worn to minimize exposure that can cause serious illnesses and healthcare workers wear to prevent contact with infectious agents or body fluids), and 2. Wound Care RN (WCRN) did not perform hand hygiene during Resident 32's wound care. These failures had the potential to spread harmful germs to patients, leading to increased risk of infections, including those resistant to antibiotics (medicines to treat bacterial infections), and potentially causing serious illness to Resident 32. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/25 at 10:55 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3/1Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 of 48 sampled residents (Resident 143) for 2 consecutive days, This failure decreased the potential for the residents to get assistance from staff in a timely manner when needed and increased potential safety risk. Findings: Resident 143 was admitted to facility in 2025 with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently) and Myocardial Infarction (a heart attack -heart muscle begins to die due to lack of sufficient blood supply and oxygen). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized evaluation tool used to assess health and functional status of a resident) indicated Resident 143 was dependent with bathing, toileting, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident 143 was incontinent with bowel and bladder functions and had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin wound). The MDS assessment triggered care plan risk areas for care providers to monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for one (Resident 1) of four sampled residents when staff did not perform hand hygiene (the process of washing or sanitizing one's hands to prevent the spread of disease) during wound care for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to impede the wound healing process for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses that included enterococcus (a type of bacteria) infection. During a review of Resident 1's Ordering Information ([NAME]), with the start date of 7/3/24, the [NAME] indicated, Special Instructions: Coccyx pressure injury [damage to the skin and the underlying tissue caused by constant pressure or friction]-cleanse with wound cleanser. apply (sic) foam dressing daily. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/24 at 10:40 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 performed wound care for Resident 1. LN 1 removed Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure injury prevention and treatment consistent with the professional standards of practice were promoted for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 1's care plan for turning and repositioning every two hours was not implemented; and 2. Resident 2's low air loss (LAL) mattress (specialty bed designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a surface to prevent skin breakdown) bed pump was turned off. These failures had the potential risk to result in delayed healing and deterioration of the pressure ulcers (PUs). Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (a brain condition that causes a rapid decline in brain function), and cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to conduct an initial skin assessment upon admission for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's admission skin assessment was not completed until the day after admission. This failure had the potential for a DTPI (Deep Tissue Pressure Injury- an injury that occurs when pressure damages the soft tissue beneath the skin surface, but there is no open wound) on the sacrum (base of the spine) to not be identified upon admission causing a delay in intervention and treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission History LTC [Long Term Care], dated 4/2/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:30 p.m. for right femur fracture [broken thigh bone] with surgical repair and had other multiple diagnoses including protein calorie malnutrition (deficiency of protein and other nutrients), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% (five percent) for one of 38 sampled residents (Resident 68). When a Licensed Nurse (LN) administered Resident 68's medications which included: 1. Insulin lispro (medication used to lower blood sugar level) not in accordance with Physician Orders. 2. Polyethylene glycol 3350 (medication used for constipation) not in accordance with Physician Orders. As a result, two errors were identified out of 30 opportunities for error during the observation of medication administration resulted in facility's medication error rate being 6.67%. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 2/5/24 at 8:08 a.m., LN 4 was observed to prepare Resident 68's medications including 11 units of insulin lispro. On 2/5/24 at 8:22 a.m., LN 4 administered 11 units of insulin lispro and there was no breakfast tray for Resident 68. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 8:30 a.m. with LN 4, LN 4 stated, Breakfast was served between 7 to 7:30 a.m. and Resident 68's breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and secured correctly, when: 1. An expired menthol tube (a medication used for wound treatment) was found in the medication room B. 2. Eleven expired acetaminophen suppositories (medication to be inserted in rectum for fever and pain) were found in medication room C inside the medication refrigerator. 3. An incineration/sharps bin (a box with one way locking mechanism for discarding used needles) was not secured/locked to the medication cart 1 at station A. It contained pharmaceutical products being accessible to residents or unauthorized individuals. These failures had the potential for medication ineffectiveness, medication diversion, and medication misuse. Findings: 1. During a concurrent inspection and interview on [DATE] at 8:52 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 3 in the medication rooms B, a tube of menthol 1% (one percent - a medication for wound treatment use) was found in a tray with expiration date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record record, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when canned food was found in the dry storage area without a received date or use-by date. This failure had the potential to result in food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation of the dry storage area and interview on 2/7/24 at 9:05 a.m. with the Nutrition Services Manager (NSM), the NSM verified six 6 lb (lb: pound, a unit of measurement) 9 oz (oz: ounce, a unit of measurement) cans of beets, six 6 lb 15 oz cans of chickpeas, six 6 lb 8 oz cans of mixed vegetables, and six 6 lb 10 oz cans of pineapple chunks had only a manufacturer's date, and no received or use by date. NSM was asked his expectations for the labeling of canned foods and stated, It should have a received date and a use by date. During an interview on 2/7/24 at 10:52 a.m. in the kitchen office with Registered Dietician (RD), RD was asked her expectations for the labeling of canned goods and stated, We follow standard operating procedures with food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for census of 164 residents when: 1. Restorative Nurses Assistant 1 (RNA) touched Resident 5's roll/bread with bare hands, 2. RNA 2 did not sanitize hands before touching Resident 46's eating utensils, 3. Uncovered and partially covered green linen carts contained clean linens, 4. Laundry worker's uniform (LW) touched the clean white linen while transporting it. 5. Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, long thin flexible tube inserted through a vein) dressing was not changed for Resident 458 and Resident 469, 6. Resident 465's isolation trash can was overflowing and without a cover, 7. Urinals were unlabeled for Resident, Resident 114, Resident 52, and Resident 103, 8. Resident 50 and Resident 93's respiratory equipment were unlabeled, 9. Resident 29's wheelchair and Resident 14's geri chair (a lounge chair) arm rest pads were in disrepair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated when one of 38 sampled resident's (Resident 41) low air loss mattress (LAL, designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) was off and the resident had a Stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) pressure ulcer. This failure had the potential for the pressure ulcer to worsen and for the resident not to reach her highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2019 with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (a nervous system disease that affects the brain and spinal cord). During a review of Resident 41's Physician Order (PO), dated 5/3/17, the PO indicated, Specialty Bed Type: Low Air Loss .Special Instructions: For wound healing. During a review of Resident 41's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/28/23, the H&P indicated, .bed bound .pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4 . During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the communication needs were met for one of 38 sampled residents (Resident 151) when there was no communication sheet or device accessible for the staff to communicate with the resident. This failure had the potential for Resident 151 to have unmet care needs. Findings: Resident 151 was admitted early 2024 with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and dialysis (ESRD, kidney failure that required procedure to removes excess waste producs from the blood). During a review of Resident 151's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/17/24, the MDS indicated moderate memory loss. During a review of Resident 151's care plan (CP) titled, Communication, dated 1/17/23, the CP indicated, Alteration in communication r/t [related to] language barrier .Language(s) spoken: Telugu .Resident will: Be able to communicate his/her basic needs utilizing the communication devices provided .Communication Board Provided . During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/12/24 at 9:20 a.m. with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and a secure environment were provided to four of 38 sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 44, Resident 87 and Resident 133) when the floor was found to be in disrepair. This failure had the potential to result in accidents and injuries. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in mid-2023 with diagnoses which included glaucoma (eye condition that causes blindness), hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal) and asthma (difficult to breathe with inflamed airways). During a review of Resident 10's restorative nursing care plan, dated 3/24, the care plan indicated, .walks with a front wheel walker short distance. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility in late 2013 with diagnoses which included transient ischemic attack (TIA, brief stroke causing weakness), hemiplegia or hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), and osteoporosis (bone loss). During a review of Resident 44's restorative nursing care plan, dated 1/24, the nursing care plan indicated, .ambulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for one of 38 sampled residents when Resident 125 was not able to receive pain medication patch according to the Physician's Order. This failure had the potential for Resident 125 to have unwanted adverse effects or inadequate pain relief from the medication patch. Findings: During an observation on 2/5/24 at 8:40 a.m. in Resident 125's room, Licensed Nurse (LN) 5 was observed to provide a lidocaine transdermal patch (a medication patch to relief localized pain) to Resident 125. Resident refused to get the patch since an older patch was still in place on the right lower leg (RLL) which was applied previously with no documentation. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 8:45 a.m. with LN 5, LN 5 stated, Resident 125 showers during the evening shift after 3 p.m. and the old patch will be removed along with ACE wrap (a bandage) prior to shower. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 2:22 p.m. with LN 5, LN 5 stated that lidocaine patch had been rescheduled for 3 p.m. to be removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure that one of 38 sampled residents (Resident 49) was free of an unnecessary psychotropic medications (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions, or behavior) when Resident 49 was receiving quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication, indicated for bipolar disorder (a mental illness causes shift in mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration) for an inadequate indication and dosage while Resident 49 was not a physical threat to self or others. This failure resulted in Resident 49 being extremely sleepy, tired, and weak during morning hours and declining to participate in the morning care, treatment, and activities. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/7/24 at 8:34 a.m. with the facility's Pharmacist (PHARM), the PHARM stated, Resident 49 was admitted to the facility from the acute care hospital in April of 2022, with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, hypertension [a condition when pressure of blood is too…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 38 sampled residents (Resident 68), was free from significant medication errors when Resident 68's insulin lispro (medication used to lower blood sugar level) was administered after breakfast and not in accordance with the Physician's Order. This failure resulted in Resident 68 experiencing lightheadedness and having abnormally low blood sugar levels that needed immediate medical interventions. Findings: During an observation of medication administration on 2/5/24 at 8:22 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 was observed to administer Resident 68's medications which included 11 units of insulin lispro. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 8:30 a.m. with LN 4, LN 4 stated, Breakfast was served between 7 to 7:30 a.m. and Resident 68's breakfast tray was already removed from the room. Reconciliation of the observation of medication administration with Resident 68's current Physician Orders indicated, Insulin lispro [Brand name of insulin] 100 u/ml [units/milliliter, unit of measure] give 8 [eight] units,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.1+1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIGNITY COMMUNITY CAREOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/01/2019
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/01/2019
PETERSDORF, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2019
SCHARMANN, STEVENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2019
CARSWELL, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
MELFI, MITCHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
O'QUINN, MARVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
MORISSETTE, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555344. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next