No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mount St Francis Nursing Center

7550 Assisi Hts, Colorado Springs, CO 80919 · Non profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (719) 598-1336 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5731 Silverstone Ter · (719) 636-3333 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6820 Centennial Blvd · (719) 264-1665 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5126 Community Center Dr · (719) 407-8290 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3786 Woodmen Rd · (719) 385-5940 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.3%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.8%8.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.1%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.4%13.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.6%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.2%20.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.8%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%75.6%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.131.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.711.741.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.18
RN hours/ resident / day
0.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.91
RN hoursweekends
55.0%
Total nursing turnover
43.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 95.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-06)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for three of three certified nurse aides (CNA). Specifically, the facility to complete regular in-service education based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews for CNA #8, CNA #9 and CNA #10. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Performance Management Procedure, reviewed 6/1/2020, was provided by the director of quality and safety (DQS) on 3/6/25 at 2:38 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility expects its managers and their direct reports to participate in the annual performance review process and discussions. Job performance is evaluated based on the following: established competencies, established responsibilities/job duties and established goals as determined by the organization, manager and employee. II. Record review The annual performance reviews and the regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#16) of two residents reviewed for abuse out of 46 sample residents was free from abuse. Specially, the facility failed to protect Resident #16 from sexual abuse by Resident #58. Findings include: I. Incident of sexual abuse between Resident #16 and Resident #58 on 11/14/24 A. Facility investigation The facility's investigation documented an incident occurred on 11/14/24 between Resident #16 and Resident #58 in Resident #16's room. Certified nurse aide (CNA) #2 witnessed Resident #58 in Resident #16's room prior to lunch. Resident #58 was patting Resident #16's buttocks with his hand and attempting to kiss her on the mouth. The residents were separated and taken to lunch. CNA #2 alerted registered nurse (RN) #1 of what was witnessed. Resident #16 was interviewed by the unit manager (UM) and stated Resident #58 had come into her room without knocking and uninvited. She said Resident #58 sat and talked with her and then attempted to kiss her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to initiate an appropriate facility-initiated discharge for one (#58) of three residents reviewed for appropriate discharge out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Complete an assessment with attempted interventions prior to giving the resident a discharge notice; and, -Ensure there was a documented basis from the physician that the resident's needs could not be met and discharge was necessary. Findings include: I. Resident #58 A. Resident status Resident #58, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included unspecified dementia and hydrocephalus (build up of liquid on the brain). The 1/14/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. He required maximum staff assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. He required partial staff assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in one of three medication storage rooms and three of three medication storage carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure medications were labeled with the date they were opened; and, -Ensure expired or discontinued medications were removed and discarded from medication carts and storage refrigerators. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline, Highlights of Prescribing Information ([DATE]), retrieved on [DATE] from https://gskpro.com/content/dam/global/hcpportal/en_US/Prescribing_Information/Trelegy_Ellipta/pdf/TRELEGY-ELLIPTA-PI-PIL-IFU.PDF, Discard Trelegy Ellipta six weeks after opening the foil tray or when the counter reads zero (after all blisters have been used), whichever comes first. According to the manufacturer Astra Zeneca, Symbicort Medication Guide, Symbicort Prescribing Information ([DATE]), retrieved on [DATE] from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on one of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for Resident #20, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP); -Ensure proper infection control practices were followed during wound care; and, -Ensure hand hygiene was performed appropriately during wound care. Findings include: I. Failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate PPE for Resident #20, who was on EBP A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), Description of Precautions (4/2/24), retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/PPE.html on 3/12/25, Enhanced barrier precautions:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-30 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ an infection control preventionist (ICP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Specifically, the facility failed to have a qualified ICP involved with the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: I. Professional references The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 5/8/23 and retrieved on 12/11/23, from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html read in pertinent part, Nursing homes should assign one or more individuals with training in infection prevention and control (IPC) to provide on-site management of the IPC program. This should be a full-time role for at least one person in facilities that have more than 100 residents or that provide on-site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection for one of three floors. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized in COVID-19 positive rooms; -Ensure residents were provided with an opportunity to participate in hand hygiene before meals; -Ensure shared equipment was properly disinfected between use; -Ensure staff followed proper hand hygiene procedures when moving from task to task; and, -Provide accurate isolation precautions, including isolation signage and assure the resident doors remained closed. Findings include: I. Ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized in COVID-19 positive rooms. A. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Hand Hygiene updated 2/7/23, retrieved on 12/11/23 from:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent food-borne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Holding temperatures were appropriate; -Moisture was not between stacked pans; -Appropriate sanitation of utensils, lids and thermometers; and, -Appropriate sanitation of food coolers on resident floors. Findings include: I. Holding temperatures A. Professional reference The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code (2019) p. 441, When food is held, cooled, and reheated in a food establishment, there is an increased risk from contamination caused by personnel, equipment, procedures, or other factors. If food is held at improper temperatures for enough time, pathogens have the opportunity to multiply to dangerous numbers. Proper reheating provides a major degree of assurance that pathogens will be eliminated. It is especially effective in reducing the numbers of Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) that may grow in meat, poultry, or gravy if these products were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive at the appropriate temperatures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #45 was interviewed on 8/14/23 at 10:51 a.m. Resident #45 said the rice was always hard. Resident #45 said she had complained but they had not fixed the concern or had offered an alternate food choice. Resident #5 was interviewed on 8/14/23 at 12:09 p.m. Resident #5 said the evening meal was not palatable. For an alternative they always give you peanut butter and jelly, yogurt or ice cream. Resident #50 was interviewed on 8/14/23 at 3:40 p.m. Resident #50 said sometimes the food was served cold, eggs especially. The hot plate worked too well and ended up toasting the bottom piece of bread until it was very hard. Resident #54 was interviewed on 8/14/23 at 3:24 p.m. Resident #54 said the food was horrible and bland. It did not have any spice. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, well balanced diet that meets his or her nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the allegations and preferences of each resident for four (#71, #209, #91 and #53) out of 48 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #71, #209, #91 and #53 were provided food that accommodated their food dislikes and preferences. Findings include: I. Resident interviews, observations and record review A. Resident #71 1. Observation On 8/16/23 at approximately 6:00 p.m., an unidentified certified nurse aide (CNA) approached the kitchen window and said Resident #71 requested an alternate vegetable because she did not like nor could chew the green beans. Dietary aide (DA) #2 said she was unable to give Resident #71 a different vegetable because there was no alternative to the green beans. 2. Record review Resident #71's food selection ticket revealed the resident had no dislikes but had a regular mechanically soft diet. B. Resident #53…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection for two out of three units at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff were following the proper cleaning techniques for cleaning resident rooms and disinfecting high frequency touched areas (call lights, door handles and hand rails); -Ensure surface disinfectant times were followed; and, -Ensure staff engaged in hand hygiene between providing care to two residents. Finding include: I. Housekeeping failures A. Professional reference Assadian O, Harbarth S, Vos M, et al. Practical recommendations for routine cleaning and disinfection procedures in healthcare institutions: a narrative review. The Journal of Hospital Infection. 2021 Jul;113:104-114 was retrieved on 821/23 revealed in pertinent part: High-touch surfaces, on the other hand, are usually close to the patient, are frequently touched by the patient or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#36) out of 48 sample residents had the right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was able to visit with a visitor of her choice. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The Resident Rights policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the director of health information management (DHIM) on 8/17/23 at 4:30 p.m. In pertinent part it read: under federal and state laws you have the following rights and responsibilities. Your rights and responsibilities may be assigned and delegated to your guardian, conservator, or other legal surrogate consistent with state law. To the extent possible, we will encourage and assist you with your exercise of your rights and responsibilities, as long as you do not interfere with the rights of other residents. We will not engage in interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal when you exercise your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure five (#2, #4, #7, #27 and #43) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 48 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #4, #7, #27 and #43 were kept free from abuse by Resident #92. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 6/6/23, was provided by the director of health information management (DHIM) on 8/16/23 at 9:15 a.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation, involuntary seclusion, and physical or chemical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff, residents, volunteers, consultants, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Observations and/or allegations of abuse, neglect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide two (#86 and #45) of two residents out of 48 sample residents with the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident #86 received showers according to her preferences; and, -Ensure resident #45 was provided with a functional system to meet her communication needs. Finding include: I. Activities of daily living-showering and bathing preferences A. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Bath Preference policy and procedure, reviewed 7/30/2020, was provided by the director of health information management (DHIM) on 8/17/23 at 4:35 p.m. It read in pertinent part, (Facility name) ) shall honor the resident's bathing preferences. As new residents move into the Neighborhood, their bath preference will be established and the bath schedule revised to reflect their choice. At the time of each bath the resident will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#158) residents out of two who required respiratory care received the care consistent with professional standards of practice out of 48 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to for Resident #158: -Ensure a physician's order was in place to include the appropriate care of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine; -Follow manufacturer recommendations to maintain, clean, sanitize, and store Resident #158's CPAP; -Accurately complete section O in the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment under respiratory treatments; -Ensure a care plan was in place to include settings, cleaning, disinfecting, and storage of the CPAP; and, -Ensure staff was properly trained to use the CPAP sanitizing chamber. Cross-reference to F726 failure to train nursing staff on the care and use of the CPAP. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The CPAP/BiPAP Non-Invasive Ventilation policy, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were able to demonstrate competence in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents who required the use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine as identified in the resident assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to provide training to the nurses on the cleaning, sanitizing and storage of CPAP machines. Cross-reference to F695 respiratory care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Employee Training policy updated 7/25/19, was provided by the director of health information management (DHIM) on 8/17/23 at 5:43 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part: It is the policy to ensure all staff are well trained and competent employees need to replenish their knowledge and acquire new skills to do their jobs better. This would benefit both the employees and the residents who are served. The staff development coordinator or department managers will develop training checklists…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#92) of six residents reviewed for dementia care of 48 sample residents received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and effectively identify person-centered approaches for dementia care for Resident #92 to prevent resident-to-resident altercations and address repeated behavioral issues which created an environment where abuse persisted. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dementia Care policy, revised 11/2/22, was provided by the the director of health information management (DHIM) on 8/16/23 at 9:15 a.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part: Proving care that is focused on what each resident needs to maintain dignity and a positive sense of self. Tailoring personal care approaches, meal service, and activities to the individual by paying close attention to past life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve residents' ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) for three (#9, #8 and #65) of three residents reviewed out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: - implement a restorative nursing program as recommended by physical therapy for transfers and range of motion for Resident #9, - implement a restorative nursing program as recommended by physical therapy for range of motion, balance and transfers for Resident #8, and - implement a walk to dine program for resident #65. Findings include: Facility policy and procedure The policy dated 9/14/18, titled Referral to Restorative Nursing Services was received from the health information manager (HIM) on 8/14/19 at 12:50 pm.The policy documented in pertinent part, when a resident, who is receiving therapy services is approaching discharge from therapy, the supervising therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Resident #9 A. Resident status Resident #9, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2019 computerized physician's orders (CPO), diagnoses included: diabetes mellitus type II, essential hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease. The 8/2/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented Resident #9 had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 14 out of 15. He was totally dependent on staff for bathing and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. B. Observation On 8/12/19 at approximately 1:45 pm two CNA ' s were observed rolling a mechanical lift into Resident #9's room. C. Record review The 7/26/19 physical therapy discharge summary documented the resident was able to complete two person stand pivot transfer with the nursing staff for all bed and wheelchair transfers but he requires the mechanical lift for toileting and pericare. The comprehensive care plan dated 5/7/19 documented to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for three (# 9, # 74 and #15) of four residents reviewed out of 32 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to: - follow physician's orders to check blood pressure prior to administering Lisinopril (antihypertensive medication) to resident #9, - act on obtaining a physical therapy evaluation timely for Resident #15 as recommended by the medical provider, and - reassess the use of a wander alarm bracelet for Resident #74 Findings include: Professional Reference Kizior, [NAME] J. & [NAME], [NAME] J., (2019) [NAME] Nursing Drug Handbook, pp. 706-709.Lisinopril (antihypertensive). Adverse effects of this medication were excessive hypotension (low blood pressure). Nursing considerations and interventions for this medication included monitoring the blood pressure. Facility policy and procedure The policy titled Administration of Medication in the Electronic Medical Record (eMAR), was received from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/28/2023
BEHRE, ALMAZIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/28/2023
SHEPHERD, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/28/2023
MCGINN, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/28/2023
MELFI, MITCHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/28/2023
MORISSETTE, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/28/2023
DONOHOE, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/28/2023
GAASCH, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/28/2023
COMMONSPIRIT MOUNTAIN REGIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/28/2023
CARPENTER, DEBRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/28/2023

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 1%Other / private 16%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,368per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$358per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065325. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next