Chi Franciscan Villa
3601 S Chicago Ave, South Milwaukee, WI 53172 · Non profit - Other · 90 certified beds · (414) 764-4100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $257,227 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.4% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.6% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.9% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.0% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.7% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.8% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.4% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.8% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.13 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.85 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.2%CMS range 27.9–46.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.7%CMS range 11.4–19.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.5–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for elopement (R16.)Facility elopement assessment upon R16's admission indicated R16 was an elopement risk. The facility did not pick up on this conclusion and did not put measures in place to prevent elopement. On 06/09/2025, R16 eloped from the facility, fell on the railroad tracks approximately 0.4 miles from the facility, and was brought to R16's family members house/R16's former home by persons who found R16. The facility was not aware of R16's elopement until R16's family member notified the facility that R16 had eloped to R16's family members house and sustained a fall. R16's family member brought R16 to the Emergency Room, where R16 was diagnosed with abrasions to R16's forehead, right knee, and right hand.The failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent R16 from eloping from the facility created a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 4 residents (R1) was free from verbal and mental abuse. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D intentionally moved R1's call light out of his reach and closed his door, thereby taking away R1's ability to summon assistance in the event of an emergency or need. CNA D reported her actions to RN E (Registered Nurse); however, RN E did not report the incident to the Administrator. This allowed CNA D to work 3 shifts at the facility following the incident before she was suspended. The facility's failure to ensure residents were free from abuse created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 10/19/24. Surveyor notified the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) of the immediate jeopardy on 11/8/24 at 11:10 a.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 11/8/24, however continues at a scope/severity of D (potential for more than minimal harm/isolated) as the facility continues to implement its action plan. Findings include: Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Examples 3 and 4. Falls: The facility policy, entitled Falls - Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018, states: Assessment and Recognition . 2. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following: a. Vital signs b. Recent injury, especially fracture or head injury c. Musculoskeletal function . d. Change in condition or level of consciousness e. Neurological status f. Pain g. Frequency and number of falls since last physician visit h. Precipitating factors- details of how fall occurred. i. All current medications, especially those associated with dizziness or lethargy. j. all active diagnoses 3. The staff and practitioner will review each resident's risk factors for falling and document in the medical record. 5. The staff will evaluate, and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility. 6. Falls should be categorized as: a. Those that occur while trying to rise from a sitting or lying to an upright position. b. Those that occur while upright and attempting to ambulate. c. Other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility 1.) failed to attach wheelchair footrests during transport for one of six residents (Resident (R) 46) who was transported by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1 which resulted in the resident's right foot being dragged under her wheelchair, requiring hospitalization, further medical treatment and harm. 2.) The facility also failed to reassess the safety of R4's slide board transfers after implementing an air mattress with inflated bilateral bolster which altered the transfer surface and had the potential to cause a fall and injury. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of accidents with the potential for injury. A total of 32 residents were included in the sample. Findings include: 1. Review of R46's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 09/16/24 with a diagnosis of muscle weakness. Review of R46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/05/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and does not develop pressure injuries unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure injuries receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing for 1 of 2 (R4) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R4 developed a facility acquired stage 3 pressure injury on her left buttock and an unstageable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) on her right lateral ankle. Surveyors had observations of care plan interventions not in place and R4's feet were observed not to be offloaded during survey. Findings include:R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include anoxic brain damage, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R6 and R5) of 4 received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent and be free of accidents. R6 did not have a low bed in place and experienced a fall that resulted in sutures and a closed face fracture. R5 was not provided with supervision per R5's care plan to ensure safety while eating and to prevent choking. Findings include: 1.) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, Adult Failure to Thrive, Right Orbital Fracture and Cognitive Communication Deficit. R6's admission MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5, indicating R6 is severely cognitively impaired. Section E0900 Wandering documents wandering behavior occurred 1 to 3 days during the assessment period. Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documents that R6 require supervision or touching assistance to sit to stand and requires partial/moderate assistance for chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents remained free of accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (R1 and R2) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. *R1 rolled out of bed while receiving cares on 10/15/2025 that resulted in a closed displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur. *R2 did not have reminder signs placed in R2's room or trip hazards removed from R2's room per care plan, and did not have an accurate fall risk assessment completed on 10/9/2025. Findings include: The facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing last approved 5/2025 documents: Based of previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try and prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Fall Risk Factors:1. Environmental factors that contribute to the risk of falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents remain free of accident hazards and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (R10 and R41) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents. * R10 had a fall on 12/5/2024 that was not thoroughly investigated. R10 had a fall on 12/12/2024 that resulted in a left subdural hemorrhage and laceration to left upper forehead requiring 3 (three) sutures. * R41 had a fall on 10/21/2024 that was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility policy titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting revised July 2017 documents: Policy Statement: All accidents or incidents involving residents, . occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 2. The following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident/Accident form: . c. The circumstances surrounding the accident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation methods for the prevention of foodborne illnesses when staff did not wear hair restraints while working in the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary condition. Specifically, the facility failed to label, date, and store food properly. Finally, the facility failed to ensure [NAME] 2's personal drink was not left in the kitchen refrigerator. This failure increased the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 82 of 84 residents who ate food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen and interview on 05/26/26 9:20 AM, the following was noted: -Cook2 was observed preparing chicken for lunch meal without wearing a beard restraint.-Cook3 was in the food prep area, and he did not have a beard restraint on. [NAME] 2 confirmed that he did not have a beard restraint on and that he typically did. -The first refrigerator on the right side of the kitchen contained a transparent plastic container of chopped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly contained which would affect 86 census residents and staff in the facility. This had the potential to attract pests. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 05/26/26 at 9:20 AM, Cook2 accompanied the surveyor and went outside of the facility where there was one dumpster. The dumpster was open and contained three quarters of trash. Cook2 stated that there was typically a pole to pull the dumpster lid down but was unable to locate this device during the observation. Cook2 stated it was important to keep the dumpster lid closed to prevent pests, such as racoons, from entering the dumpster. During an interview on 05/28/26 at 1:38 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that the dumpsters were to remain closed, so pests did not enter. Review of a facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated 05/27/26 indicated .The facility shall properly dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse.Refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility and designed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: 1.) ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE), was donned (put on) by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 prior to entering into (Resident (R) 33's room who was under contact precaution; 2.) failed to post proper Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) signage for neutropenic isolation for R58; and 3.) failed to ensure Housekeeping Aide (HA)1 transported soiled linens without placing these items in a plastic bag. This increased the likelihood that infectious organisms could be transmitted from residents to staff, other residents, or the environment. Findings include: 1. Review of R33's admission Record, located under the Profile tab electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 04/24/26. Review of R33's Physician Orders, dated 04/27/26 and located under the Orders tab in the EMR, revealed the resident was placed on contact isolation due to multi-drug-resistant organisms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure injuries and injuries of unknown origin were reported timely for two of three residents (Resident (R) 21 and R46 out of a total sample of 32 residents. This deficient practice had the potential for harm from unrecognized abuse by not identifying injuries of unknown origin. (Cross reference F689) Findings include: 1. Review of R21's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed an admission date of 04/16/26 with medical diagnoses that included unspecified dementia and adult failure to thrive. Review of R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/21/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. During an interview on 05/26/26 at 11:25 AM, Family Member (FM) 1 expressed concern about the big red sore on R21's breast that was observed earlier that morning while R21 was being dressed for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) to maintain appropriate hygiene for two residents (Resident (R) 81 and R25) reviewed for ADLs out of a total sample of 32 residents. This failure had the potential for the residents to have unmet hygiene needs and affect resident care. Findings include: Review of R81's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident (R) 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, chronic respiratory failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of R81's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/17/26, and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that her cognitive function was intact. The MDS indicated R81 required partial to moderate assistance for oral care. Review of R81's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate tube feeding management for one resident (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for tube feedings out of a total sample of 32 residents. This failure had the potential for the resident and others receiving liquid nourishment via tube feedings to receive outdated nourishment and created the risk for infection. Findings include: Review of R10's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] and under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of zero out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of R10's Care Plan, focus initiated on [DATE] and located under the Care Plan tab in the EMR, revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an opened vial of Tuberculin (TB) Purified Protein Derivative was labeled when opened with an expiration date in one of two medication rooms reviewed for storage and labeling. This deficient practice had the potential for inaccurate TB testing due to the vial potentially being expired and ineffective. Findings include: An observation on [DATE] at 11:40 AM, the refrigerator in the med room on the Heritage North Hallway, contained a vial of TB derivative was stored in a box on the shelf in the door. The vial was opened without a date to reflect when the vial was opened. The manufacturer expiration date was 09/27. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 verified the opened vial of TB derivative should have been dated when opened and marked for expiration 28 days after being opened, and it was not labeled. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:52 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1, confirmed when a vial of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility policy, resident-specific meal service documents, and menu records, the facility failed to provide meals consistent with neutropenic precautions for one out of one resident (Resident (R) 58), out of a survey sample of 32, by serving fresh fruits and vegetables despite the resident's need to avoid those foods. The facility's failure to provide meals consistent with neutropenic isolation precautions placed the resident at increased risk for exposure to foodborne pathogens. (Cross Reference F880) Findings include: Review of R58's admission Record located under the Profile tab in electronic medical record (EMR), indicated the facility admitted the resident on 04/05/25. Review of R58's Physician Orders, dated 01/16/25 and located under the Orders tab in the EMR, indicated the physician ordered the resident to be placed on reverse (neutropenic) isolation since the resident received chemotherapy. Review of a document referred to as a Meal Ticket, provided by the facility, for R58 failed to indicate that the resident was not to be served fresh fruit and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were complete for two of five residents (Resident (R) 73 and R76) reviewed for vaccination status out of a total sample of 32 residents. This had the potential for the residents not to receive accurate care. (Cross Reference F883) Findings include: 1. Review of R73's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 07/29/25. A review was conducted of R73's clinical record and there was no evidence that the resident was offered, received, or declined the 2025 influenza vaccine. 2. Review of R76's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the EMR, indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 08/05/21. A review was conducted of R76's clinical record and there was no evidence that the resident was offered, received, or declined the 2025 influenza vaccine. Review of a document titled, Status, provided by the facility, indicated Registered Nurse (RN) 4 was hired on 06/11/25 as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, document review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer two of five residents (Residents (R) 73 and R76) reviewed for flu/pneumonia vaccinations and/or their representatives, the opportunity for the residents to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for residents to contract pneumonia. Findings include: 1. Review of R73's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 07/29/25. Review of R73's Immunization, located under the Immun (Immunization) tab of the EMR, indicated that R73 received the Pneumovax 23 (PPSV23) vaccine on 04/29/11. The resident received the Prevnar 13 (PCV13) vaccine on 10/05/16. Finally, the resident received her annual influenza vaccine on 10/04/24. There was no evidence that showed the resident was offered, consented, or declined the 2025 influenza vaccine. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident potentially affecting 86 of 86 residents in the Facility. * The Facility had documented low staffing ratios in the month of October. Findings include: Due to a complaint received alleging October 2025 the facility was constantly understaffed Surveyor reviewed the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) report for July 1 to September 30, 2025, and the facility triggered for one star staffing and excessively low weekend staffing. Surveyor reviewed PBJ report for October 1 to December 31, 2025, provided by the facility, and the facility again triggered for low weekend staffing. On 02/17/26, at 8:25 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-H and was told staffing is no different here than anywhere else, they are short because of the call ins. When asked about doing transfers with the mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 1 (R7) of 7 residents reviewed was treated with respect and dignity.On 2/17/26, at 9:58 AM, Surveyor observed R7 being wheeled down the hallway in a shower chair to the shower room wearing a hospital gown with R7's left hip and side of buttocks exposed.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Dignity, not dated, documents the following:Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem.Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times.Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures.R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Congestive Heart Failure (weakened heart muscle), lymphedema (chronic buildup of fluid in the arms or legs causing swelling), morbid obesity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not establish a grievance policy to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights, ensuring that all written grievance decisions include the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, and any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance for 1 of 2 (R4) residents reviewed for grievances.R4's family filed a grievance on 8/14/25. There was no evidence of follow-up or resolution of the grievance with R4's family.Findings include:R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include anoxic brain damage, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy and gastrostomy status, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder and anxiety.R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act, the facility did not report 1 of 1 allegations of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency during the required timeframe.R1's spouse reported to the facility on [DATE] that R1's wedding ring was missing. The wife contacted the police department 12/3/25. This was delayed in being reported to the State Survey Agency until 12/9/25.Findings include:The Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, effective 5/22/25, documents (in part):IV. Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation.B. Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to4. Resident reports of theft of property, or missing property.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, neurodegenerative brain disorder and the most common cause of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 9 (R5) residents reviewed. R5 has been sent to the hospital repeatedly for behavior of pulling out her own tracheostomy tube. A care plan with interventions for this behavior was not developed or implemented. In addition, tracheostomy care and treatment are not included in the Facility Assessment.Findings include:R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy (trach) status, laryngeal hypoplasia, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, obesity, functional quadriplegia, dysphagia and type 2 diabetes mellitus.The facility policy titled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change dated 5/22/25 documents (in part):The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance received the necessary services to maintain ability to practice good grooming and personal hygiene.R3 is scheduled for showers twice a week and did not receive showers on 7/26/25, 8/9/25, 8/13/25, 8/23/25, 8/27/25, 8/30/25, 9/6/25, 9/10/25, 9/17/25, 9/20/25, 10/4/25, 10/8/25, 10/11/25, and 10/15/25.Findings include:The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated 3/6/22, last approved 5/22/25, documents the following:Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their own ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs).Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. R1 pulled out their catheter prior to a fall on 11/30/25. The catheter was reinserted and hematuria was noted. R1 was on an antiplatelet and an anticoagulant. There is lack of documentation that R1 was being monitored for bleeding due to being on blood thinning medications. R1 was sent to the hospital later for hematuria.Findings include:R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, neurodegenerative brain disorder and the most common cause of dementia, characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes), delirium (an acute, fluctuating disturbance in attention, awareness, and cognition that develops rapidly (hours to days), often caused by underlying medical conditions, infections, or medication side effects),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident representative written request for a medical record was granted. This was observed with 1 (R3) of 1 resident record requests reviewed. * R3's Representative requested, in writing, a copy of R3's medical record. When initially requested, R3 was responsible for themself and decisions and R3's Representative was not eligible to receive the records. In the day's following the request and denial, R3's Power of Attorney for Health Care (POAHC) status was reviewed and activated naming R3's Represebtative as the POAHC. The facility did not address the request for records given the change in R3's POAHC status. Findings include:The facility policy and procedure (Name of facility) administrative standards for medical record release dated 5/22/2025. Under 4.) Information from a medical record is released to individuals only upon receipt of a properly executed authorization from the resident for their legal representative.Findings include:R3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative (RR) of a newly developed pressure ulcer injury for one (Resident (R)1) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer review in the sample of five.Findings include:Review of R1's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anoxic brain damage, and congestive heart failure. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment reference Date (ARD) of 07/28/25 indicated R1 was coded to be in a persistent vegetative state with no discernable consciousness. Review of R1's N ADV – Skin Check – V 18 located under the Assessments tab in the EMR and dated 08/19/25 indicted R1 did not have a wound to her left posterior ankle. Review of the hospital Discharge documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one (Resident (R)1) of five sample residents. Findings include:Review of R1's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anoxic brain damage, and congestive heart failure. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment reference Date (ARD) of 07/28/25 indicated R1 was coded to be in a persistent vegetative state with no discernable consciousness. The MDS indicated that R1 was coded as having a tracheostomy. Review of R1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) located under the Orders tab in the EMR and dated for the months of August through October 2025 indicated missing documentation to reflect the care was performed and completed for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during tracheostomy care for one resident (Resident (R)1) out of five residents that were reviewed.Findings include:Review of R1's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anoxic brain damage, and congestive heart failure. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment reference Date (ARD) of 07/28/25 indicated R1 was coded to be in a persistent vegetative state with no discernable consciousness. R1's MDS was coded as having a tracheostomy. Review of R1's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab in the EMR indicated, Focus dated 08/01/25 indicated, I have a Tracheostomy r/t [related to] Impaired [sic] breathing mechanics/prolonged cardiac arrest,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure resident was free from misappropriation of property for 14 of 14 residents reviewed for misappropriation.*The Facility identified multiple medication discrepancies involving Registered Nurse (RN)-D. The Facility did not ensure misappropriation of resident's narcotic medications did not occur and did not ensure resident's narcotic medications were accounted for appropriately.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Incident submitted to the State Agency on 06/02/2025 regarding medication diversions. Surveyor noted the Facility documented on 05/30/2025, multiple controlled medication errors were brought to the Facility's attention.The Facility documented that Registered Nurse (RN)-D was identified as the nurse responsible for the multiple discrepancies with the controlled medications. Surveyor reviewed the Facility provided document titled, CONTROLLED DRUG PROCESS AUDIT, completed on 06/05/2025 through 06/06/2025. Surveyor noted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of Narcotic Medication Misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 Facility Self Reports to the State Agency.* 9 (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of 14 residents were not interviewed by the Facility for pain outcomes after the Facility identified narcotic medication discrepancies.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Incident submitted to the State Agency on 06/02/2025 regarding medication diversions. Surveyor noted the Facility documented on 05/30/2025, multiple controlled medication errors were brought to the Facility's attention. The Facility documented that Registered Nurse (RN)-D was identified as the nurse responsible for the multiple discrepancies with the controlled medications. Surveyor reviewed the Facility provided document titled, CONTROLLED DRUG PROCESS AUDIT, completed on 06/05/2025 through 06/06/2025. Surveyor noted the following residents had controlled medication signed out in the control log but was not documented in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 2 Facility Reported Incidents was submitted to the State survey agency timely. *On 05/30/2025, The Facility was made aware of a possible diversion of narcotic medications. The facility did not report this to the State Survey Agency until 06/02/2025.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Incident submitted to the State Agency on 06/02/2025 regarding medication diversions. Surveyor noted the Facility documented on 05/30/2025, multiple controlled medication errors were brought to the Facility's attention. The Facility documented that Registered Nurse (RN)-D was identified as the nurse responsible for the multiple discrepancies with the controlled medications. On 07/14/2025, at 3:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A regarding the late reporting of medication misappropriation to the State Agency. NHA-A indicated that NHA-A spoke with corporate and was told not to report and indicated that the Facility was still investigating if it was truly a misappropriation at that time. NHA-A indicated that NHA-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-30 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Scope of Practice for Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered (NDTR), the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Technician (DT) had oversight/supervision by the Registered Dietician (RD) to meet the assessment and ongoing needs of the residents for two residents (Residents (R)3 and R6) out of a total sample of 13 residents. This failure placed all residents at risk of unidentified nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the 2024 Scope and Standards of Practice for the Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered by the Commission on Dietetic Registration; pages 15-16 revealed, .NDTRs work under the clinical supervision of an RDN .NDTRs may work independently in providing general nutrition education to healthy populations .Conducting nutrient analysis, collecting data and conducting research, and managing food and nutrition services in a variety of settings .As a member of the NDTR/RDN team, the NDTR supports the RDN by providing key oversight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility policy, and the resident assessment instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for one (Resident (R3) in a total sample of 13. The facility failed to accurately code the correct weight on the quarterly assessment and the correct documentation of the number of wounds on the discharge return anticipated assessment. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled MDS 3.0 Completion, dated 03/04/23 revealed, .Correction of Error on the Assessment .A Modification Request is used when an MDS record (assessment, entry tracking record or death in facility tracking record) .(already transmitted and accepted by CMS [Center for Medicaid and Medicare Service], but the information in the record contains clinical or demographic errors. It must be corrected within 14 days after identifying the errors . Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy , the facility failed to ensure showers were provided for two residents dependent on staff for care (Residents (R1, R3) out of a total sample of 13 residents. This failure placed the residents at risk of skin breakdown and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of facility procedure titled, Bath, Tub/Shower, dated February 2018 revealed, .Documentation .The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed .The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath .All assessment data (e.g., any reddened areas, sores, etc., on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower/tub bath .If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the interventions taken .How the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath .The signature and title of the person recording the data .Reporting .Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the shower/tub bath .Notify the physician of any skin areas that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was oversight/supervision from the Registered Dietician (RD) of the Dietary Technician (DT) for one resident (Resident (R)6) of three residents reviewed in a total sample of 13 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk of further weight loss and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nutritional Assessment, dated 11/28/22 revealed, The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall condition. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a stroke with left side paralysis, difficulty swallowing and dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during wound care for one resident (Resident (R)8) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 13. This failure placed the residents at risk of developing complications from an infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 02/13/25 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms .Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO [multidrug-resistant organism] as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) .Wounds generally include chronic wounds, not shorter-lasting wounds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) R4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes new pressure injuries, an unstageable to left plantar foot, a stage 4 pressure injury right dorsal first toe, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, urogenital implants dysphagia, resistance to multiple antibiotics. R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/22/2024, documents a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating that R4 has severe cognitive impairment R4's Urinary Catheter care plan, dated 10/29/2022 (revision on: 9/23/2024) with a target date of: 3/29/2025, documents: I have a 16 F (French) cubic centimeter suprapubic catheter: neurologic bladder, retention. Under the Interventions section in the urinary catheter care plan, it documents: Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Surveyor had multiple observations of R4's catheter facing the entrance of R4's room door. R4's urinary catheter care plan above stated that the catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 2 (R33 & R45) of 18 residents reviewed for bathing. * R33 was observed to have dirty fingernails, facial hair, uncombed hair and had not had a shower or bed bath in 30 days. * R33 was not offered or assisted with repositioning. * R33 was not assisted with cutting up R33's food per R33's plan of care. * R45 was observed to have long dirty fingernails, poor oral hygiene and only had 3 bed baths or showers in the last 30 days. Findings: 1.) R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes cerebral palsy, hemiplegia affecting left side, dysphagia, and mild cognitive impairment. R33 has a activated Power of Attorney (POA). R33's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents that R33 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating R33 is cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R22) of 18 reviewed for change of condition. On 10/21/2024 R22 had blood noted in R22's brief. No assessment was completed, and R22's physician was not notified. On 10/23/2025 R22 had another episode of blood in R22's brief. No assessment was completed, and R22's physician was not notified. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Notification of Changes, with a last revision date of 08/10/2022documents: Policy: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Compliance Guidelines: The Facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 3 (R45, R41, R73) of 5 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. *R45's wound treatments were not consistently being marked as completed in R45's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) or documented in R45's Electronic Health Record (EHR) as being completed. * R41 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and was assessed to have a pressure injury to the sacrum area. A treatment was not initiated until 12/18/2024 and the facility did not document wound treatments as being completed per physician orders. R41 did not have refusals documented or a revised care plan to indicate R41 refused wound treatments. * R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple pressure injuries. The facility did not complete comprehensive wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure the necessary services to provide respiratory care were consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R10) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. * R10 had continuous oxygen via nasal canula set at 3 L (liters)/min (minute) during the survey. R10's oxygen tubing was not labeled and did not have humidification attached. There was no respiratory/oxygen care plan for R10, despite R10 having an order for oxygen 2-5 L via face mask as needed. Findings include: The facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revised October 2010 documents: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Preparation: 1. Verify the physician order . 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Equipment and Supplies: . 2. Nasal canula, ., mas (as ordered) 3. Humidifier bottle. 1.) R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately to the Administrator. Failure to report an allegation placed all residents at risk as the accused staff person was allowed to work throughout the building. CNA D refused to provide cares to R1, removed R1's puff activated call light, and shut R1's room door. CNA D reported her actions to RN E. RN E did not report the allegation of abuse to NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator). CNA D was allowed to continue to work with residents for an additional 3 shifts before it was reported to administration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, dated 10/24/22, revealed, .The facility will have written procedures that include .Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure only licensed nursing staff administered medications to residents who resided on one of two units (Heritage). This failure placed the residents on the Heritage unit at risk for negative outcomes due to the potential for medication errors. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 05/03/22 revealed, Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. During an interview on 06/18/24 at 12:03 PM, CNA G (Certified Nursing Aide) stated she had been a CNA for the last 17 years and has been working at the facility since October of 2023. CNA G was asked if she had been asked to pass medication in the facility. CNA G stated, One time I was asked to pass medication. It was a holiday and several nurses called in that day. The DON (Director of Nursing) came in and asked me to. She did push and pass. The DON pushed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for three of seven sampled residents (Resident (R) 3, R4, and R5). All three residents sustained verbal abuse from two different staff members. These failures placed the residents at risk of psychosocial harm. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, implemented on 10/24/22 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and tights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Policy Explanation and compliance Guidelines: The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: a. Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property; .3. The facility will provide ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-05 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they provided consistent staff to meet the resident needs for the 76 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. During review of the payroll-based-journal (PBJ) staffing data for the facility, the facility was triggered in the fiscal year quarter 3, 2023 (April-June) for low weekend staffing. Findings include: Review of the facility PBJ data, as part of the survey offsite process, indicates during the 3rd quarter of the federal fiscal year (April 1-June 30) the facility was triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. On 11/30/23 at 1:05 p.m., Surveyor interviewed Director of Human Resources (DHR)-D and Administrator-A regarding the PBJ entries for Fiscal Year 2023 quarter 3 (April 1- June 30). DHR- D stated that the company called (name of) is where they import the information from. The hourly staff are automatically uploaded from the time sheets. Staff that are not hourly (for example Administrative staff), their time is added manually. Additional hours that are added manually include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 (R70, R48, R68 and R56) of 7 residents reviewed for pressure injuries received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and promote healing. ~ R56 had a pressure injury to her coccyx that healed 4/27/23. The facility documented the treatment continued until 7/23/23 when R56 was admitted to the hospital, except for many refusals documented. When R56 was readmitted on [DATE], the coccyx wound was not assessed until 8/3/23. During survey, wound care to multiple wounds and pressure injury to coccyx was observed. The nurse never completed the wound care to the coccyx wound. Also, Pressure Reducing Mattress was not set to the correct settings making pressure reduction ineffective. ~ R70's air mattress was set to 180 pounds on several observations during the survey and R70's most recent weight is 201.5 pounds. ~ R48's air mattress was set to 350 pounds on several observations during the survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that all medications were labeled in accordance with standard of practice for 3 of 3 medication carts (Skylight East, South, North) and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Skylight South) with the potential to affect 35 of 76 residents residing in those units. Findings include: On 11/30/23 the facility's policy titled Storage of Medication dated 8/20 was reviewed and read: When the original seal of the manufacturers container or vial is broken, the container or vial will be dated. 1. On 11/29/23 at 8:30 AM the medication cart on the Skylight East wing was observed and the following was found: * a bottle of partially used saline nasal spray was not dated when open and had no resident name. * a bottle of lubricant eye drops partially used with no resident name or date open. * a bottle of [NAME] tears eye drops partially used with no resident name or date open. * a bottle of refresh eye eye drops partially used with no resident name or date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 (R29) of 1 residents reviewed for self administration of medications was assessed prior to staff leaving medications at bedside for a resident. Facility nursing staff were observed preparing R29's medications and leaving them with R29 when R29 stated they wanted to take the medications when they had breakfast. R29 was not assessed to self administer their medications. Findings include: R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Dementia. R29 Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 11/29/23 at 8:06 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-Q was observed administering medication to R29. LPN-Q placed a B Complex vitamin, Aspirin 81 milligrams (MG), Cinacalcet 60 MG, Renvela 1,600 MG, Venlafaxine 25 MG. Carvedilol 25 MG, and Hydralazine 25 MG in a medication cup and placed it on R29's over bed table. R29 indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R70) of 18 residents sampled were reasonably accommodated to provide access to a call light. R70's call light was not accessible to R70 on 5 observations during the survey. Findings include: On 11/27/2023 at 10:06 AM Surveyor observed R70's call light clipped to the call light cord by the call light device on the wall out of R70's reach. Surveyor asked R70 if R70 was able to reach the call light that was pinned to the call light cord. R70 replied no, R70 is unable to reach the call light. Surveyor asked how R70 how R70 asks for help. R70 replied R70 usually calls out for someone. On 11/27/2023 at 3:15 PM Surveyor observed R70's call light clipped to the call light cord by the call light device on the wall out of reach of R70's reach. R70's activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance, pain, obesity, history of falls and weakness, impaired mobility and gait care plan initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure advanced directives were in the residents medical record for 1 (R68) out of 18 sampled residents. * R68's Do not resuscitate consent form was not placed in her medical record after it was signed. It was found in a pile waiting to be scanned into the computer in medical records which are not always accessible to nursing staff. Findings include: R68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Hemiplegia and right below the knee amputation. R68's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R68 had a Brief interview for mental status score of 14 (Fully intact memory.) R68 was able to make decisions for herself. On 11/28/23 R68's medical record was reviewed and no advance directives could be found. On 11/28/23 at 12:36 PM Administrator-A was interviewed and indicated R68's code status should have been in the computer on admission and was not. Administrator-A indicated R68's advanced directives were found in a pile of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R9) of 4 residents with allegations of abuse or injuries of unknown origin had these allegations reported to the state agency. On 10/4/23 R9 was discovered to have a bruise to the left breast and left forearm. R9 wasn't able to tell staff how the bruise occurred. R9's bruises meet the definition of an injury of unknown origin and the facility did not report this to the state agency. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy with date of 10/24/22 indicate: vii. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframe's: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R9) of 4 residents with allegations of abuse or injuries of unknown origin had a thorough investigation completed. On 10/4/23 R9 was discovered to have a bruise to the left breast and left forearm. R9 wasn't able to tell staff how the bruise occurred. R9's bruises meet the definition of an injury of unknown origin and the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation into R9 bruise. Findings include: The facility's Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy dated 10/24/22 indicate: . d. Injuries of unknown source: include circumstances when both the following conditions are met; i. The source of the injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident. ii. The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, location of the injury, the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time, or the incidence of injuries over time. 6. Investigation: The facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R56) of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure injuries received care based upon acceptable standards of practice. R56 had 2 areas of Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) to her Left Buttocks and Upper Left Thigh. When R56 was readmitted from the hospital, the wounds were not assessed timely. R56 refused to see the Wound MD for assessments but agreed to weekly head to toe assessments by staff. The staff did not measure or assess the wounds during these weekly assessments and the wound team did not reapproach R56 for the weekly assessments, leading to missing multiple weeks of measurements. During survey, observations of infection control breaks during wound care were observed. 2 new wounds were noted during wound care that were not reported to Wound MD or Wound Team. The wounds were treated with a dressing. The Wound Team discovered the 2 wounds two days later. Findings include: R56 was admitted to the facility 3/26/20 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the Facility did not ensure 3 (R2, R56 and R68) of 3 Residents reviewed received appropriate treatment and services related to catheter care. *R2 has a suprapubic (SP) catheter. R2's collection bag was observed multiple times laying directly on the floor by R2's bed and without an anchor device to hold the tubing in place. R2's catheter tubing was observed stretched with tension in the tubing line and R2 was pulling at tubing. R2 has MD orders for a dry dressing to suprapubic site. R2's suprapubic site observed multiple times with no dressing on it. *R56 has an indwelling urinary foley catheter. R56's catheter bag was observed being emptied with multiple breaks in infection control. *R68 has an indwelling urinary foley catheter. R68's collection bag was observed laying directly on the floor. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Catheter Care policy with a date of 5/10/23. Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that resident with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that it maintained a medication error rate below 5 percent during observations of medication administration affecting 2 (R8 and R29) of 2 residents observed. Three medication errors were observed out of twenty-six opportunities, for a total error rate of 11.54 %. * R8 was administered Cetirizine 10 milligrams (MG) from a bottle where the expiration date rubbed off bottle in addition R8's order was for 5 MG and she was given 10 MG. R8 was also not given her Flonase as ordered. R29 was given Monifloxacin eye drops after the discontinue date of 11/25/23. Findings include: On 11/30/23 the facility's policy titled General Guidelines for Medication Administration dated 8/20 was reviewed and read: Medications are administered in accordance with the written orders of the prescriber. On 11/29/23 at 8:20 AM Medication Aide (MA)-Z was observed administering medication to R8. MA-Z poured the medication Cetirizine 10 milligrams (MG) from a stock bottle. The expiration date on the bottles label was rubbed off and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that staff performed proper hand hygiene and infection control for 2 (R8, R70) of 3 residents observed during the medication pass observation. * A Medication Aide was observed not wearing gloves to administer eye drops to R8 and did not wash her hands after the administration. The Medication Aide then went and preformed a blood glucose check for R70 without washing her hands between residents Findings include: On 11/29/23 at 8:20 AM Medication Aide (MA)-Z was observed administering medication to R8. After Administering R8's nasal spray and oral medication MA-Z did not wash her hands or apply gloves and administered R8's Sustaine eye drops to both eyes. MA-Z did not wash her hands and completed a blood glucose check for R70. MA-Z did apply gloves before completing the blood glucose check but did not wash her hands before applying the gloves. On 11/30/23 the facility's policy titled eye drop administration dated 08/20 which read: put on examination gloves. After administration remove and dispose of gloves,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement its policy and procedure to inhibit abuse, neglect, and mistreatment of residents which had a potential to affect all 11 residents residing on the unit. The facility did not implement its policy and procedures to safeguard residents by removing the certified nursing assistant (CNA)-H from patient care when R1 accused CNA-H of abuse on 8/12/2023. R1 did not have monitoring or care plan revision to monitor psychosocial or long term effects from the accusation of abuse. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation implemented 10/24/2022 states: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will implement develop and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility did not always ensure that they posted the nurse staffing data, to include the date, resident census, and the total actual hours worked by Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Certified Nurses Aides, on a daily basis. This has the capability to affect all 76 residents which is the total census upon survey entrance. This is evidenced by: On 11/30/23 01:00 PM Surveyor made observations of the front entrance near reception area. It was noted the nurse staff posting was dated for Tuesday 11/28/23 and noted the census to be 93 resident census. Surveyor conducted a review of the facility's schedules and coinciding nurse staff posting hours for April 1, 2023 through June 30,2023. It was noted that the census was documented at 93 residents for each day. The facility is only licensed for 90 beds. Surveyor made observations at 7:30 a.m. on 12/4/23 of the nurse staff hours posted near the reception desk. The posting is dated 11/28/23 and noted the census to be 93 residents. On 12/4/23 at 10:45 a.m., Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$257,227 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $48,620 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-07-16
- $44,532 — penalty dated 2025-02-20
- $121,797 — penalty dated 2024-11-08
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-03 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYLVANIA FRANCISCAN HEALTH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2017 |
| COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 07/01/2017 |
| LIPSEY, PRENTICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/17/2021 |
| MBANU, TERIKA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/05/2024 |
| MELFI, MITCH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| CECIL, CAITLIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/18/2012 |
| FINN, CHRISTINA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| GRUBBS, STACEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2012 |
| HAZARD, TED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2017 |
| MUNROE, KYLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2015 |
| MURRIEL, SHELLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| NAGEL, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/12/2015 |
| SNODGRASS, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2016 |
| WINE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| IFFLAND, ALISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| REHMER, HEATHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2024 |
| CONCEPT REHAB, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2015 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2025 |
| THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2025 |
| ULRICHPINCIOTTI DESIGN GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2011 |
| ALCARAZ, NATALIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/03/2020 |
| FILLER, DIANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/15/2024 |
| GOYAL, ALOK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| GULOCK, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/02/2017 |
| HERBERT, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2020 |
| HOWARD, CASEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| KENDRICKS, DERREL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/24/2024 |
| LONGHIN-HOWARD, JOAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2007 |
| MCFARLAND, DIANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2023 |
| MCINERNEY, NANETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| PENKWITZ, CODY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2025 |
| REIHBRANDT, LARRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/15/2024 |
| SCHOLL, WANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| TOPIC, ZELIBORKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| UTESCH, PATTI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| ARCHON, ANGELA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| BLACK, PAUL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| DAUWER, ELLEN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| GEMMA, ANN MARIE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| HANELT, PETER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| HARDY-WALLER, ANTOINETTE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| KAPLAN, GARY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| LASSITER, WRIGHT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| MCKENNA, MICHELLE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| MEDLER, LINDA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| REYES, CAROLYN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| STEELE, PATRICK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| YANG, PHOEBE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| YATES, GARY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| BARTA, ELIZABETH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2018 |
| LUCAS, GINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 84 rows in the source record cover these 51 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $714K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525526. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.