No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Keystone Post-Acute

3672 North First Street, Fresno, CA 93726 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 65 certified beds · (559) 227-5383 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 227-5383 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$42,764 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $42,764 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-15)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3727 N 1st St Ste 106 · (559) 457-6900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3636 N 1st St Ste 134 · (559) 229-6000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3263 E Shields Ave · (559) 224-1443 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.5%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.0%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.612.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.171.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.66U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.9%CMS range 34.1–51.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.6–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge75.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.6–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 60.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-30)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) was free from accidents, when Resident 7, who was identified as being at-risk for falls with a history of multiple falls in the facility, fell and was injured when left unattended in her unlocked wheelchair on 8/31/23. This failure resulted in Resident 7 being sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation. Resident 7 was diagnosed with an odontoid fracture (break of the second bone in the neck) and was hospitalized from [DATE] to 9/8/23. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease with memory loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to prevent falls, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 27), when Resident 27 had known behavior of getting up unassisted from bed, was assessed as being a high fall risk, had a history of falls (2/6/22, 2/27/22, 4/2/22 and 4/11/22) in the facility, and the facility did not develop and implement interventions that were person-specific in the comprehensive care plan to prevent Resident 27 from falling. This failure resulted in Resident 27 getting out of bed unassisted on 4/11/22. Resident 27 fell and sustained a displaced right intertrochanteric fracture (broken hip bone that have moved out of their normal position) and right anterolateral (in front and to the side) second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh rib fractures and experienced pain. Resident 27 required surgical intervention and required hospitalization at the acute care hospital from [DATE] to 4/16/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 45), when Resident 45 was identified as being at risk for falls with a history of multiple falls in the facility and the care plan intervention to place the bed in the low position was not implemented on 12/27/21. This failure resulted in Resident 45 experiencing an unwitnessed fall from the bed on 12/27/21 onto the floor. After the fall, Resident 45 experienced left side pain and was sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation. Resident 45 was diagnosed with a left femur fracture (broken thighbone) and required surgical repair and was hospitalized from [DATE] to 1/4/22 (eight days). After the fall, Resident 45 experienced a decline in mobility and pain due to the fall and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 1/5/22, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not assessed for safe transfer, seating, and supervision needs prior to being transferred and Resident 1 was left unattended in wheelchair despite documented weakness and limited mobility on 4/17/26This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing an unwitnessed fall from a wheelchair on 4/21/26 onto the floor. After the fall Resident 1 experienced facial abrasions and busing and was sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 5/8/26, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a five-day respite (temporary, short-term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accept one of four resident's (Resident 1) back after hospitalization when Resident 1 required the services provided by the skilled nursing facility (SNF) and was sent to the hospital for an urgent transfer due to a critically low hemoglobin (protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to the rest of the body) level of 4.5 (normal hemoglobin levels for men range from 13.5-17.5). After being stabilized at the hospital, Resident 1 was denied readmission to the SNF.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being readmitted to the skilled nursing facility. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 2/4/26, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Resident 1 had the following diagnoses upon admission: muscle wasting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when one three-compartment sink in the kitchen did not contain air gaps (unobstructed vertical space between the water outlet and the flood level of a fixture) to prevent backflow of sewage (waste) water on 5/27/25 for 58 of 59 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk for foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or drink) and food contamination. Findings: During an observation and interview on 5/27/25 at 9:15 a.m., with Kitchen Staff (KS) 1, during a tour of the kitchen, three-compartment sink did not have a visible air gap (unobstructed vertical space between the water outlet and the flood level of a fixture) to prevent backflow of sewage (waste) water. KS 1 stated the three-compartment sink was utilized by the cooks to clean their dishes. At the time of the observation, compartment 1 of the sink was filled with hot water and sanitizer. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services met the needs of two out of three sampled resident's (Resident 54 and Resident 166) when three controlled medication (medication with a high potential for physical and mental dependence) entries for Resident 54 and four controlled medication entries for Resident 166 did not have received by dates in the controlled drug disposition log. This failure resulted in inadequate record keeping of controlled medication which had the potential to lead to inaccurate controlled medication inventory, delayed medication destruction, diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally) of controlled medications and delayed identification of controlled medication diversion. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/25 at 2:27 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) the facility's Controlled Drug Disposition Log, dated 5/2025, was reviewed. The disposition log indicated, Resident 54 had three controlled medication entries listed on the log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for three of 15 residents (Residents 3, 16, and 31) when Residents 3, 16 and 31 failed to receive insulin (a short-acting insulin [a hormone that lowers the levels of sugar in the blood] used to treat diabetes [a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing]) prior to eating their meal per physician's orders and manufacturer's recommendations. This failure had the potential to place the Residents 3, 16, and 31 at risk of not receiving the desired amount of insulin which could result in hypoglycemia (low blood glucose [b/s - a simple sugar] the body's primary source of energy from food) and potentially lead to negative medical outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/28/25 at 7:48 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 in Resident 3's room, observed meal carts in the hallway outside Resident 3's room while RN 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label medication in the medication room and in two of three medication carts when: 1. Resident 25's inhaler was stored in the medication room and not labeled. 2. Resident 11's, Resident 19's and Resident 28's eye drops, as well as Resident 167's liquid morphine sulfate (controlled medication used to treat pain) was stored in medication cart A and not labeled. 3. Resident 39's and Resident 216's eye drops was stored in medication cart B and not labeled. These failures had the potential to result in misidentification of a medication, for Residents 25, 11, 19, 28, 167, 39 and 216 and had the potential for needed medication to not be available for resident use. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/28/25 at 2:27 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the medication room, Resident 25's albuterol sulfate (powder medication that is inhaled and used to treat shortness of breath) inhaler was observed with no resident or pharmacy label on the inhaler. The DON stated Resident 25's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promote quality of life for two of 11 sampled residents (Resident 59 and Resident 30) when Resident 59 did not receive a shower on 5/8, 5/12, 5/15, 5/19, and 5/26 and Resident 30 did not receive a shower on 5/9, 5/13, 5/16, and 5/20. This failure resulted in nine missed opportunities for personal hygiene care and resulted in Resident 59 to feel dirty, neglected and isolated and Resident 30 to feel dirty and gross. Findings: During interview on 5/27/25 at 10:23 a.m. with Resident 59 in her room, Resident 59 stated she had not received a shower in three weeks and expressed a desire to have one. Resident 59 stated staff were not providing her scheduled showers and had not provided a reason for why she was not receiving them. Resident 59 stated she is supposed to be showered on Monday and Thursday. Resident 59 stated she had not refused any showers. Resident 59 stated this made her feel dirty and neglected, and as a result she mostly stayed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eleven sampled residents (Resident 38) was provided the opportunity to participate in his care process when the facility did not attempt to contact Resident 38's family or friends to act as a representative or decision maker on or throughout admission and did not involve Resident 38's, family, friends or a patient care representative prior to obtaining informed consents. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 38's wishes and preferences not being upheld by the acting facility representative which had the potential to lead to decreased autonomy (ability to make own decisions and control own actions) or participation in his care planning process. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to ensure one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 16) was provided with safe, clean, comfortable furniture that is in good working condition when the over-the-bed table had an approximate 2-inch by 1.5-inch chip out of the corner of the table with exposed sharp edges and a visible area that would be considered a porous surface leaving the area a potential for injury and unable to be cleaned. This failure had a potential to result in Resident 16 sustaining serious injuries, including skin tears and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR, a document containing resident personal information), dated 5/29/25, the AR indicated, Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which in included Cerebral Infarction (when part of the brain and brain cells does not get enough blood and oxygen because a blood vessel is blocked and those brain cells can die), Type 2 Diabetes (a disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive individualized care plan was developed and implemented for one of 15 residents (Resident 57) when Resident 57 ' s care plan was not developed and implemented for monitoring and care of his central venous catheter port (a thin tube that goes into a vein in your arm or chest and ends at the right side of your heart and is attached to a device [port] under the skin) and surgical incision wound. This failure had the potential to put Resident 50 at increased risk for wound infection, pain, discomfort and medical complications of his indwelling central line due to improper care and monitoring of his device and surgical incision wound. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/27/25 at 10:51 a.m. with Resident 57 in Resident 57 ' s room, Resident 57 was observed dressed sitting in a wheelchair with a dressing on his right upper chest. Resident 57 stated he had been at the facility for a couple of weeks.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 216) when Resident 216 did not have his urinary catheter(a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain and collect urine) changed per physician order, the physician was not notified that the catheter was not changed and Resident 216 had signs that included mucus and sediment in the catheter tubing, amber-colored foul-smelling urine. This failure resulted in a missed urinary catheter change, and the lack of notification regarding Resident 216 ' s catheter tubing had the potential of delayed diagnosis and treatment of a urinary tract infection, increasing risk of worsening infection. Findings: During an observation on 5/27/25 at 10:38 a.m. in Resident 216 ' s room, Resident 216 ' s urinary catheter bag contained dark-colored urine and there was visible sediment and mucus in the catheter tubing. The room had a strong odor of urine. During a review of Resident 216 ' s admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eleven sampled residents (Resident 38) was effectively and efficiently cared for by the administrator to maintain Resident 38's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when the Administrator (ADM) was the acting decision maker for Resident 38. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 38 to not maintain his highest well-being, wishes and preferences not being upheld which had the potential to lead to decreased autonomy (ability to make own decisions and control own actions) or participation in his care planning process. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive functioning that interfere with daily life), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for two of 26 sampled residents (Resident 57 and Resident 216) when: 1. When Resident 57 was not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms [bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics] that requires gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) for his central venous catheter port (a thin tube that goes into a vein in your arm or chest and ends at the right side of your heart and is attached to a device [port] under the skin) incision wound. This failure placed Resident 57 at risk for cross-contamination (the process when germs are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, which causes a harmful effect) and infection (an invasion of the body by germs that cause disease). 2. When Resident 216 ' s urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 46) had access to a call light when Call light cord was found strung over the head of the bed and the call light was tucked between the mattress and the bed frame. This failure resulted in Resident 46 not being able to directly call for assistance and had the potential to place Resident 46 at risk for accidents and injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR, a document containing resident personal information), dated 5/29/25, the AR indicated, Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which in included wedge compression lumbar fracture of the first vertebra (the first bone in the lower back has been squished or crushed in a way that makes it look like a wedge - narrower in the front than the back) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Alzheimer's (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and Cognitive Communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and an accident-free environment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 eloped (a resident who departs from a facility unsupervised and undetected) on 3/10/25 from the facility through the front entrance door and was found on 3/14/25 when resident returned back to her apartment. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility on 3/10/25, which placed Resident 1 at risk for harm, injury and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis history that includes but not limited to epilepsy (A disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Resident 1 and Resident 2 were involved in a resident to resident verbal altercation on 9/20/24, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together to establish goals for residents) met on 9/23/24 and implemented Social Services Director (SSD) and Activities Director (AD) daily visits from 9/23/24 to 9/25/24 and Resident 1 and Resident 2's care plans were not updated to reflect these interventions. Resident 1 and Resident were not seen by the SSD and the AD on 9/24/24 and 9/25/24. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 at risk of not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized care interventions to ensure their safety and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/3/24, the AR indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurately documented and readily accessible medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for three of six sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 4) when: 1.Resident 1 had care plan interventions for 15 Minute Checks (staff member is checking on resident every 15 minutes) documentation from 9/20/24 to 9/23/24 (72 hours) and facility staff was unable to locate 15 Minute Checks documentation for 9/20/24 to 9/21/24. 2.Resident 2 ' s care plan had goals documented for Resident 1. 3.Resident 4 had care plan intervention for 15 Minute Checks documentation from 9/15/24 to 9/18/24 (72 hours) and facility staff was unable to locate 15 Minute Checks documentation for 9/17/24 and 9/18/24. This failure resulted in incomplete medical records for Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 4, inaccurate medical record for Resident 1 or 2 and the facility not following their policy and procedure titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for six of 61 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6) when an unknown visitor entered the building on two occasions, and on the second occasion, entered three resident rooms and stole a cellular telephone from Resident 1. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 experiencing fear and a theft of a cellular telephone from Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled Facility Reported Event (FRE), dated 7/27/24, the FRE indicated, Around 6:45 am on 7.27.24, a visitor entered the facility. It was unknown who the visitor was there to visit or his purpose there. The visitor followed closely behind an employee and entered the building where he was seen walking through the building and entered and exited 3 Resident rooms. [Resident 1] reported that her phone is missing and that the visitor took it from her room. The visitor has come in the building the night before and was asked to leave. The visitor was escorted out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when large pantry storage room temperatures were 96 degrees Fahrenheit (F- a unit used for measuring temperature) in the large pantry where dry goods (sugar, flour, oatmeal, cream of wheat, canned fruit, pancake mix, cornbread mix, chicken and beef flavored base, bottled lemon juice, packaged Jello, cooking oil, and packaged condiments) were stored. This failure had the potential for the dry goods to spoil and cause food-borne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) for residents that ate from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/13/24 at 6:22 p.m., with the Dietary [NAME] (DC), in the kitchen, an observation was made in the large pantry (room temperature was 96 degrees F. Dietary [NAME] confirmed both the temperature from a temperature gun (a device that provides temperature measurement) in addition to the thermometer on the wall of the large pantry storage room were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0700 — widespread
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 16 of 16 Residents (Residents 6, 8, 25, 27, 29, 32, 35, 37, 38, 41, 43 44, 45, 48, 53, 270) were assessed for the risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard [raised] or lowered position) and bed assist rails (a bed rail used to assist the resident with repositioning or getting in and out of bed) prior to installation, had consent (form signed by resident or family explaining the risks of bed rail use), used appropriate alternatives, and followed the manufacturers' recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining bed rails prior to the use of the bed (side) rails when: 1. Resident 6, 8, 27, 38 had bed assist rails (U-Rail) up on one side of the bed and did not have a bed rail risk assessment, consent, physician orders, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was designated as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis when the facility did not have a designated DON from 3/13/24 to 4/16/24. This failure resulted in the lack of guidance, direction and leadership to all nursing staff, and had the potential to impact the quality of care, quality of life and medical treatment and services for all facility residents. Findings: During an interview on 4/16/24 at 9:27 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the Director of Nursing (DON) was out on medical leave. The ADM stated the facility has an Interim DON (IDON) filling in full-time as the DON. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 4:16 p.m. with the IDON, the IDON stated he was hired with the facility on 1/31/24 as the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator. The IDON stated he started as on-call (available by phone) IDON on 3/18/24. The IDON stated he transferred to the full-time DON on 4/16/24. During an interview on 4/24/24 at 4:45 p.m. with the ADM, the ADM stated the DON went on leave of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — widespread
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure ten out of .residents (Residents 37, 17, 7, 50, 41, 34, 16, 11, 26, 2) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Resident 37 was administered fluoxetine (an antidepressant medication) and did not implement adequate behavior monitoring and side effect monitoring for the use of fluoxetine. 2. Resident 17 was administered buspirone and trazodone (antidepressant medications) and did not implement resident specific non-pharmacological (behavioral) interventions and adequate behavior monitoring for the use of buspirone and trazodone. 3. Resident 7 was administered duloxetine (antidepressant medication), alprazolam (antianxiety medication), and olanzapine (antipsychotic medication that alters brain chemistry to help reduce symptoms of the mind where there has been some loss of contact with reality) and did not implement resident specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure food and ice were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for all residents eating and drinking at the facility when: 1. The ice machine was not sanitized according to the manufacturer's directions 2. The dishes in dish machine were not sanitized according to the manufacturer's directions and the facility policy and procedure These failures had the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms and could lead to foodborne illnesses for the 63 residents eating food and drinking in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/16/21 at 11:21 a.m., Kitchen Aid 1 (KA) as filling up a tray of cups of punch with ice from the kitchen ice machine and 35 cups water with ice. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/16/24 at 4:16 p.m. with the Environmental Services Director (ESD) in the kitchen, MS stated he had responsibility for cleaning and sanitizing the ice machine. MS stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician obtained Informed Consents (a process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of the use of psychoactive medications) for the use of psychotropic medications (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions, and behavior) was completed for four of ten sampled residents (Residents 2, 34, 41, and 50) when: 1. Resident 2 received Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication that can treat several mental health conditions like schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions) and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that affects your moods) without an informed consent. 2. Resident 34 received Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication that treats several kinds of mental health conditions including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) without an informed consent. 3. Resident 41 received Trazodone HCl (an antidepressant medication used to treat major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 10 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 1, 7, 26, 29, 35, 39, 45, 48, 53, and 271) when: 1. Residents 1, 7, 26 and 271's shared bathroom had blackened floor tiles with dirt on the floor, a loose doorknob with the doorknob plate hanging on the doorknob, missing paint and chipped areas on the lower bathroom door frame, and scattered black areas measuring one-half to two inches on the bathroom ceiling and a hole on the bathroom ceiling measuring two and one-half by two inches. Residents 1,7,26 and 271 2. Resident 29 and 53's joint bathroom had a discolored bathroom ceiling with bubbling and peeling paint. 3. Resident 35's wall guard protector (devices installed into walls made to stop beds and equipment from touching walls) was found to have peeling paint, and a large hole. 4. Resident 39's room had an exposed floor with missing tiles and visible dirt. 5. Resident 45's bathroom was observed to have dirt and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP-a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for four of 62 sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 41, Resident 44, and Resident 45) ) when: 1. Resident 45 did not have an individualized care plan developed and implemented for unintentional severe weight loss until 41 days after admission. This failure placed Resident 45 at risk for complications from not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing interventions needed to be added, changed, or completed. 2. Resident 11 did not have a person-centered CP to address his dental needs. This failure resulted in resident 11's dental and nutrition needs to go unmet. 3. Residents 41 and 44 did not have a person-centered CP to address the use of oxygen (O2) therapy. This failure resulted in Resident 41's oxygen needs to go unmet and caused Resident 44 to receive unnecessary oxygen therapy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 11, 41, and 44) when: 1. Licensed Nurses (LNs) did not have physician orders for oxygen therapy (treatment intended to relieve or heal a disorder) administration for Resident 41 and Resident 44. 2. Oxygen tubing was not labeled with date/time and stored in a protective covering (such as a bag) when not in use to prevent contamination for Residents 11, 41, and 44. These failures resulted in residents receiving unnecessary oxygen treatment and the potential for infection from contaminated oxygen tubing. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes) dated 4/16/2024, the AR indicated, admission Date 1/23/2020 . Diagnosis Information . Personal History of Covid-19, Personal History of Nicotine Dependence . During a review of Resident 41's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services and ensure residents receive services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when: 1. One of seven Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN)s did not receive a blood glucometer (a small portable device used to check sugar levels in the blood) competency skills check off after being hired. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk of being exposed to the spread of infections. 2. Four of seven LVNs did not complete their required mandatory annual competency trainings. 3. One of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)s did not receive a competency skills check off after being hired. 4. Two of five CNAs did not complete their required mandatory annual competency trainings. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for care not provided in a safe and competent manner. Findings: 1. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 2:29 p.m. with the DSD, the DSD stated all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 23 and 31) when Resident 23 and 31's copy of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a medical order signed by both the patient and medical provider that specifies the types of medical treatment a patient wishes to receive toward the end of life) were incomplete. This failure had the potential for Resident 23 and 31's decisions regarding treatment options and end of life wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), dated [DATE], the AR indicated Resident 23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of kidney failure (a condition when the kidneys are unable to filter waste products from the blood), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (when the blood sugar levels in the body are too high), and major depressive disorder (a mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, and sanitary environment to help prevent diseases and infections when: 1. One of four residents sampled (Resident 32's) oxygen (O2) nasal cannula (NC-a tube that directs oxygen into the nose) was found on the floor and part of the tube was laying on top of a garbage can. 2. Three of four oxygen concentrators (a medical device that gives you extra oxygen) and filters sampled, were visibly soiled with dust and debris, and not cleaned according to manufacturer's recommendation. 3. One of one (central) nurses' station countertop was peeling, cracked and/or missing veneer (a thin decorative covering of fine wood applied to a coarser wood or other material) which exposed the porous, non-wipe-able countertop. 4. The facility did not have a Legionella (a microscopic organism that can cause disease) when there's an outbreak (sudden occurrence of disease) water testing protocol, nor did they perform Legionella water testing. 5. One of two medication (med) carts sampled were visibly soiled with drip marks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for new and existing Licensed Nurses (LN's), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), and ancillary (additional) support staff for demonstrated competency consistent with their expected roles in the areas of abuse, neglect and exploitation (the action of using someone or something unfairly for your own benefit) training, dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) training, communication training, resident rights training, infection control training, and falls training, for six of 13 direct care staff. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for care not provided in a safe and competent manner. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/24 at 11:16 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4's Personnel File (PF), dated (undated) was reviewed. The PF indicated LVN 4 completed dementia training on 1/27/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systemic approach to ensure effective monitoring and systems to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of five sampled Residents (Resident 45) reviewed for nutrition care when Resident 45 experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 22 pounds (lbs-measurement of weight) or 11.2 % of admitting weight in 41 days from 3/6/24 to 4/16/24 when the Nutrition Assessment was not completed in a timely manner. As a result of these failures, Resident 45's compromised nutritional status was not addressed timely by the Registered Dietitian which could lead to further medical complications including but not limited to dehydration, loss of muscle mass with decreased mobility and negatively affect the diagnoses for Resident 45 and the reasons for admission to the facility. Findings: During an observation, on 4/16/24 10:35 a.m., Resident 45 stated food is good, but no appetite. Resident 45 stated she is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 16) was offered or administered the pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lung) vaccine (a substance injected into the body to protect it against diseases). This failure placed Resident 16 at risk to develop pneumonia. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 04/17/24 at 5:09 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 16 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated April 2024 was reviewed. The IP stated, there were no records the pneumonia vaccine being given since admission. The IP stated, there were no past records of the resident receiving or refusing a pneumonia vaccine. The IP stated a declination form the refusal of the Pneumonia Vaccine should have been signed if it was offered and refused. During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive [mental processes] and physical functional level assessment) Section C, dated 3/24/24, the MDS Section C indicated Resident 16 had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review), the facility failed to ensure physical environmental maintenance were maintained when: 1. There were multiple areas of the floor throughout the kitchen that had missing sections of epoxy (a type of synthetic resin floor system that is laid on top of concrete substrates as a form of protection and decoration). resulting in a build-up of food particles. This failure had the potential to result in the growth of pathogenic (an organism which can cause diseases in a host [person)] organisms and create an environment for pest harborage for the 62 residents eating food in the facility. 2. The heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) unit (an appliance or system used to control the humidity, ventilation, and temperature in a building) was not maintained to prevent water damage for four of eight Residents (Residents 1, 7, 26, and 271) that access the restroom. This failure had the potential for Residents 1, 7, 26, and 271's shared bathroom ceiling to develop mold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three hallways, handrail was firmly secured to the wall. This failure had the potential to result in injury to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/16/24 at 3:49 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 12, in the Hollywood BLVD hallway, the side handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was loose and moved back and forth. CNA 12 stated, the handrail is lose and moved back and forth an inch. CNA 12 stated, the handrail is probably not safe for the residents to hold on to. During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/18/24 at 11:40 a.m. with the Environmental Service Director (ESD), in the hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], the ESD stated, the handrails are loose and needed to be tightened. The ESD stated, the loose handrails had the potential to cause injury if the rails come off while the residents were using it. During an interview on 04/24/24 at 11:42 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a fall intervention was not implemented for Resident 1. This failure resulted in an unwitnessed fall for Resident 1 on 8/23/23. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis) dated 8/10/23, the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Senile Degeneration of Brain (a progressive disease with memory loss), Encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function), Dementia (forgetfulness, limited social skills and thinking that interferes with daily functioning) and Bipolar Disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and serve ice in accordance with professional standards for food safety service for 51 out of 52 sampled residents, when the ice machine was not properly cleaned and sanitized according to the manufacturer's guidelines. This failure had the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms (organisms that can only be seen through a microscope). Findings: During an observation on 8/2/22, at 9:22 a.m., in the kitchen, the Dietary Services Manager (DSM) filled cups with ice from the ice machine and placed them on a tray. During an observation on 8/2/22, at 11:03 a.m., in the kitchen, the DSM filled cups with ice from the facility's ice machine for tray line beverages. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/2/22, at 3:04 p.m., with the Plant Manager (PM), in the kitchen, the facility's ice machine was observed. The shield and chute of the ice machine contained a yellow and brown substance. The PM stated he cleaned the ice machine every other month. The PM stated he removed the ice from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included antibiotic stewardship (program designed to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics and to limit the spread of antibiotic resistance [happens when germs like bacteria and fungi develop the ability to defeat the drugs designed to kill them] in bacteria) when seven of seven sampled months (January 2022, February 2022, March 2022, April 2022, May 2022, June 2022 and July 2022) did not have evidence surveillance was completed to accurately monitor the use of antibiotics for residents. This failure had the potential for residents to be placed at risk for an adverse effect of antibiotics and/or develop an antibiotic-resistant (not effective to treat infection) organisms (living thing made up of one or more cells and able to carry on the activities of life) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/5/22, at 2:24 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist/MDS Coordinator (IP/MDS), the IP/MDS reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-05 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a dedicated Infection Preventionist (IP- professional who ensures healthcare workers and patients are doing all the things they should to prevent infections) who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention control program when one of one staff (IP/Minimum Data Set [MDS- nurse that is responsible to provide a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities]) worked in both roles as the MDS nurse and the facility IP. This failure resulted in the facility to have an IP responsible for two roles (Infection Preventionist and MDS Coordinator) in the facility and had the potential for the IP duties and tasks to not be completed, ultimately affecting resident care. Findings: During an interview on 8/4/22, at 2:47 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist/MDS Coordinator (IP/MDS), the IP/MDS stated, he was the IP and the MDS Coordinator. The IP/MDS stated, he does not document how his time was split between both roles. During an observation 8/5/22, at 7:59 a.m., in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 and LVN 7 signed the Electronic Medical Administration Record (EMAR), which indicated administration of medications, prior to administering medications to two of six sampled residents (Resident 15 and Resident 4). This failure had the potential for Resident 15 and Resident 4's EMAR to have inaccurate documentation. 2. LVN 6 administered one of one sampled residents' (Resident 24) medications via G-tube (gastrostomy tube- tube inserted through the belly to the stomach) by administering the crushed tablets prior to administering the liquid medications first, against the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for Resident 24's liquid medication to not be absorbed effectively and had the potential for blockage of the G-tube. 3. One of six sampled residents (Resident 24) had two medications with a direction order change, and the medications did not have a change of direction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities when the facility failed to provide individual activities and independent activities designed to meet the interest of four of seven sampled residents (Residents 19, 21, 28, and 248). This failure had the potential to result in Residents 19, 21, 28, and 248 to be bored, which could affect their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's clinical record titled, admission Record, (document containing resident personal information) dated 8/5/22, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included, .subdural hemorrhage (bleeding between the brain and the skull), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe ) and muscle weakness. During an observation on 8/1/22, at 10:14 a.m., in Resident 19's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed when the incorrect scoop size for the pureed (a thick liquid suspension made from cooked food ground finely) diet was used when serving the pureed green beans during the lunch meal service on August 2, 2022, for eight of eight sampled residents (Residents 5, 9, 14, 19, 21 23, 35 and 43). This failure had the potential for Residents 5, 9, 14, 19, 21 23, 35, and 43 to receive the wrong caloric intake (the number of calories consumed), which could further compromise their medical status. Findings: During a review of the facility's document titled, [Name of Vendor] Menus Lunch Daily Spreadsheet dated 8/2/22, the document indicated for the puree menu, the skillet green beans #10 (number of the scoop) scoop (2.75 ounces [units of measurement]). During an observation of the lunch meal service on 8/2/22, at 11:53 a.m., the steam table had a container of pureed green beans with a #8 scoop (4 ounces). The Dietary [NAME] (DC) served eight residents (Residents 5, 9, 14, 19, 21, 23, 35, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent infections for four of five sampled residents (Residents 4, 5, 24 and 26) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 failed to sanitize (disinfect) the blood pressure cuff (device used to measure the pressure of blood in the circulatory system) in between use for Residents 4, 5, and 26; and 2. LVN 7 did not properly sanitize the glucometer (device used to measure and display the amount of sugar in the blood) according to the facility policy. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect) and transmission of infection between residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/3/22, at 7:04 a.m., with LVN 6 during medication pass, LVN 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical procedures were followed on two of two occasions (6/17/22 and 7/25/22), when unused medications were disposed of (wasted) and a witness signature was not present per the facility's policy and procedure titled, Disposal of Medications. This failure resulted in the facility to waste medications that were not in accordance with the facility's practice and had a potential for diversion (involving the transfer of any legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use). Findings: During a review of the facility's Method of Disposition log, dated 6/17/22 and 7/25/22, the log had one licensed staff signature. The witness signature was blank. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/3/22, at 8:57 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's Method of Disposition log dated 6/17/22 and 7/25/22 was reviewed. The DON stated, two licensed staff were required to count, record, and destroy any unused medications. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, when one of one Tuberculin (combination of proteins that are used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis [potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs]) vial (small container) was opened, and there was no indication of a used-by-date or when the vial was opened. This failure had the potential to yield inaccurate purified protein derivative (PPD- skin test is a test that determines if you have tuberculosis) results and or cause harm to a vulnerable population if administered beyond the manufacturer's used-by date. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 8:57 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's medication refrigerator was observed. An opened vial of Tuberculin was found in the medication refrigerator, with no opened or used-by date label. The DON stated, all opened vials of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$42,764 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $42,764 — penalty dated 2023-11-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-15 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bear Creek Nursing And RehabilitationGrapevine, TX 1 of 5Cooney Healthcare And RehabilitationHelena, MT 1 of 5Deer Creek Nursing and RehabilitationWimberley, TX 1 of 5Ennis Care CenterEnnis, TX 1 of 5Greenview Nursing and RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Lakeshore Village Nursing And RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Memorial Medical Nursing And RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Pleasanton North Nursing And RehabilitationPleasanton, TX 1 of 5Richardson Nursing and RehabilitationRichardson, TX 1 of 5Rolling Hills HealthcareBelle Fourche, SD 1 of 5San Antonio North Nursing and RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Skyline Heights Nursing And RehabilitationBillings, MT 1 of 5The Meadows On UniversityFargo, ND 1 of 5The Suites PasadenaPasadena, TX 1 of 5Yellowstone River Nursing And RehabilitationBillings, MT 2 of 5Elkhorn Healthcare And RehabilitationClancy, MT 2 of 5Jourdanton Nursing and RehabilitationJourdanton, TX 2 of 5Parkview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLockhart, TX 2 of 5Spearfish Canyon HealthcareSpearfish, SD 2 of 5The Suites Rio VistaRio Rancho, NM 3 of 5Cypress Woods Care CenterAngleton, TX 3 of 5Eastern Montana Veterans HomeGlendive, MT 3 of 5Silver Creek Nursing And RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 4 of 5Copper Ridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterButte, MT 4 of 5Hacienda Oaks At BeevilleBeeville, TX 4 of 5Heritage Trails Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCleburne, TX 4 of 5Pleasanton South Nursing and RehabilitationPleasanton, TX 4 of 5Prairie Heights HealthcareAberdeen, SD 5 of 5Bangs Nursing And RehabilitationBangs, TX 5 of 5Golden Years Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterMarlin, TX 5 of 5Highland Care CenterHolladay, UT 5 of 5Hurst Plaza Nursing and RehabHurst, TX 5 of 5Southwest Montana Veterans HomeButte, MT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRESNO NURSING AND REHAB CENTER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 06/01/2019
EDURO HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2019
CARTER, BRAEDENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2024
BEWSEY, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2019
MONROE, DUSTINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/19/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$442K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 24%Other / private 5%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $442K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$408per resident / day
operating cost
$12,408per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$385per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056266. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next