Jourdanton Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 44.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.95 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 90% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 196) reviewed for accidents and hazards. On 9/19/2024, Resident # 196 was not properly secured in the facility transport van and sustained a head laceration and a fractur to her right clavicle. The non-compliance was identified as past noncompliance. The IJ began on 9/19/2024 and ended on 9/19/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of harm, serious injury, or death. Findings include: Record review of Resident # 196's face sheet revealed she was admitted [DATE] with an initial admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, transient ischemic attack (mini stroke), depression and alcohol abuse. Record review of Resident # 196's MDS indicated a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Record review of the Facility Incident Report, dated 9/23/2024, reflected the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a full code resident with AED use during CPR as per facility policy for 1 (Resident #4) of 7 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility failed to provide a full code(full support which includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), if the patient has no heartbeat and is not breathing.) for Resident#4 with AED use during CPR as per facility policy. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The PNC IJ began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE] . The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the state's investigation began on [DATE] at 9:30 AM. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving correct CPR as per facility policy. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated [DATE] reflected Resident #4 was admitted initially on [DATE] with a readmission of [DATE] with diagnoses of DM2, s/p left above knee amputation, congestive heart failure, COPD, hypertension, anxiety,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: A bag of broccoli in the freezer was opened.A tub of peanut butter had peanut butter around the rim of the bucket.A bin of flour was opened.A box with oranges had mold. These failures could place residents who received food and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.Observation on 1/13/2026 at 9:41AM the freezer revealed a box folded close with the corners of the four flaps tucked under one another that allowed a gap in the center that revealed an open bag of broccoli, exposing it to air in the freezer. Observation on 1/13/2026 at 9:46AM the dry food storage was used as an office. Ther was a closed tub of peanut butter with peanut butter around the rim of the tub. There was a bin of flour with the top not secured and opened. There was a box with that had been used with the remainder of the oranges in the bottom that had mold on 5 of the oranges. Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 dumpsters (dumpster #1) on the premises. Three doors on dumpster #1 were opened. This failure could place the facility at risk of pests and rodents that could cause contamination of the foods stored in the kitchen and place the residents at risk of infection and illness. Observations and interview on 1/13/2026 at 10:00AM revealed dumpster #1 had 2 sliding doors opened on the sides and one of the black doors that closed on the top of the dumpster was opened. The [NAME] said she knew the doors should be closed so animals could not get into the dumpsters and garbage pickup was every Monday. Interview on 12/14/2026 at 12:03 PM the DM said it was important to keep the doors of the dumpsters closed because it could bring rats and roaches to the facility that could get into the food and cause food borne illness to the residents. Interview on 1/15/2026 at 2:28 PM the RD said it was important to keep the dumpsters closed to prevent rodents and pest contamination that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #23) who was reviewed for call light placement. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #23's call light was within reach. Resident #23 asked for water and was not able to locate his call light because it was under the fall mat. This deficient practice could result in residents not being able to ask for assistance as needed. The findings were: Review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 1/16/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia (characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities). Review of Resident #23's quarterly assessment, dated 12/26/25, revealed his BIMS score was 99 indicating staff was unable to interview him. Further review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to manage and account for the personal funds of the resident deposited with the facility for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #41) reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to disburse Resident #41's personal funds so that she could purchase incontinent supplies. This could contribute to feelings of frustration and helplessness for the residents. The findings were:Review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 1/16/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, and hemiparesis (paralysis) following cerebral infarction (an ischemic stroke, occurs when blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted, leading to tissue death due to lack of oxygen and nutrients) affecting left non-dominant side and borderline personality disorder (is a mental health condition that affects the way people feel about themselves and others, making it hard to function in everyday life.) Review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for confidentiality: in that: The facility staff left the laptop open, unlocked, and unattended on the MA cart with the screen turned on and the EMAR visible to resident records and medications. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for having their medical information being unnecessarily exposed and their personal privacy violated.The findings included: In an observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 9:15 a.m. the MA cart was at the nurse's station facing outward toward people passing through the area. There was a laptop computer on the MA cart facing away from the nurses station, and the screen was on and open to resident EMARs. The computer was unattended. There was a resident standing to the right of the cart talking on the phone at the nurse's station, another resident standing to the left of the cart talking to LVN A who was seated behind the nurse's station. LVN A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #11, and #49), reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's nebulizer mask and mouthpiece attachment was enclosed in a container or bag when it was not in use.The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's oxygen concentrator filter was clean. This failure could place residents at risk of illness, allergies, and worsening of respiratory symptoms. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 1/15/26 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. Resident #11's diagnoses included 3. COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - lung disease restricting airways, making breathing difficult), and Vitamin B12 deficiency (the level of vitamin B12 in the blood is insufficient to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use to maintain accurate medical records for 1 of 4 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for change in condition The facility failed to document the of change of condition and transfer to the hospital for Resident #2. These failures could place the residents at risk of inadequate care and a diminished quality of life.The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 01.14.2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female was re-admitted to the facility on 1.13.2026 with diagnoses: depression, traumatic brain injury, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (difficulty breathing due to progressive lung disease), and anxiety. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated 11.03.2025 revealed she had a BIMS score of 15, indicative of cognitively intact. Record review of Care Plan dated 12.10.2025 revealed she was care planned for heightened perception of events,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents or obtain them under an agreement for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.Nursing staff failed to contact the pharmacy to ask about the status of the pending order for Lyrica and consult with Resident #1's PCP to obtain a one-time order for Lyrica (pain medication) pending pharmacy delivery of the medication from 10/10/25 until 10/15/25. 2.LVN A failed to contact and consult with Resident #1's PCP and the pharmacy when Lyrica (pain medication) was not available for administration for Resident #1 per physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk of a decline in health status. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/15/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses including unspecified cirrhosis of the liver (permanent scarring that damages your liver and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical records for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure CNAs H and I completely closed Resident #11's privacy curtain while providing perineal care for the resident. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of loss of dignity.The findings were: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 11/21/2025, revealed an admission date of 12/03/2014, and a readmission date of 10/19/2020. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included: Vascular dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), Schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder characterized by abnormal thought processes and an unstable mood), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), and Irritable bowel syndrome (chronic disorder affecting the large intestine, causing symptoms like…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded for a fall with injury that occurred on 09/04/2025, on his admission MDS assessment, signed as completed on 9/11/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 11/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Diagnosis Report, dated 11/18/2025, reflected diagnoses included encephalopathy (a disease in which the function or structure of the brain is affected, typically caused by infection, tumor, or stroke), intracranial injury (an injury to the brain caused by an external force) with loss of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,334 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,707 — penalty dated 2024-10-04
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-06-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX