Yellowstone River Nursing And Rehabilitation
2115 Central Ave, Billings, MT 59102 · For profit - Individual · 160 certified beds · (406) 656-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $142,698 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.5% | 18.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.2% | 5.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 4.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.1% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 15.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 93.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 6.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.8% | 24.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.5% | 20.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.8% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.3% | 19.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 14.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 1.38 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 2.16 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 285 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.6%CMS range 54.3–66.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.1%CMS range 7.0–12.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.5%CMS range 3.4–7.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 116.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent Immediate Jeopardy level accidents and hazards resulting in a resident with a traumatic brain injury eloping from the facility through unsecured doors, accessing a public road and leaving the facility property, without staff supervision, for 1 (#1) of 9 sampled residents. This failure placed other residents at risk for elopement if they successfully exited out the unsecured doors not equipped with a wander guard alarm system, for 5 (#s 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14) of 9 sampled residents. The facility's failure increased the risk of serious bodily harm, injury, impairment, or death, due to the facility's failure to sufficiently address the doors the resident eloped from. On 6/3/25 at 1:18 p.m., the facility Administrator, previous Interim Administrator, Administrator in-training, Director of Nursing, and Clinical Nurse Unit Manager were notified of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation, which involved resident #1. The IJ pertained to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member provided safe transportation of a resident being transferred to the facility for admission for 1 (#10) of 10 sampled residents. The deficient practice caused resident #10 injury, resulting in a left ankle fracture, requiring hospitalization and surgery, which prolonged the resident's stay at the facility. The facility identified that the resident was not transported safely and immediately addressed and corrected the deficient practice before the survey, resulting in the findings of past non-compliance. Findings include:Review of a facility-reported incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 3/5/26, showed resident #10 was being transported from a local hospital to the facility for admission. Resident #10 was in a wheelchair in the facility van and was injured when the transportation staff member had to brake abruptly. The transportation staff member immediately called for emergency services assessment, and resident #10 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-05-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were transcribed into a resident's electronic medical record accurately, and failed to identify a high-risk medication ordered for a resident with end-stage renal disease for 1 (#6) of 4 residents sampled for dialysis. This deficient practice resulted in resident #6's altered mental status, requiring hospitalization and treatment. Findings include:During an interview on 5/6/26 at 3:20 p.m., staff member B stated residents were reviewed by the interdisciplinary team as new admissions, and nursing management would enter admission orders. Staff member B stated there were two staff members to check the admission orders that were entered, so they would not miss something with an order. Staff member B stated that if a resident was transferred from a hospital as a new admit, discharge orders were entered by nurse management. Staff member B stated it must have been a mistake that a couple of orders were entered differently from discharge orders for resident #6. Staff member B stated that providers entered orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer to the coccyx for 1 (#5) of 26 sampled residents. The resident's medical record failed to include consistent and accurate documentation to reflect if the wound was avoidable, although the resident was at risk for malnutrition and had a severe weight loss over recent months; and the facility implemented some interventions for prevention, but failed to thoroughly and consistently assess the wound and document the status of the pressure ulcer, such as the size, measurements, severity, characteristics and detail, and at one point, the wound was documented as a Stage IV with no defining characteristics as to why this was determined. Findings include: During an interview on 8/27/25 at 3:41 p.m., staff member P stated resident #5 has had consistent weight loss starting after his stroke (on 7/1/25).During an interview on 8/28/25 at 8:01 a.m., staff member U stated there could be a concern with resident pressure ulcers at the facility, as staff member U felt residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow interventions related to resident assistance, evaluate current abilities, and implement additional interventions and monitoring for a severe weight loss of 7.65% in one month, and the resident had a new diagnosis of Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, for 1 (#94) of 26 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation on 8/27/25 at 9:13 a.m., resident #94 was asleep in bed with his breakfast tray dropped off on his bedside table, untouched.During an observation on 8/27/25 at 9:35 a.m., resident #94's full breakfast tray was dumped into the cart for dirty dishes. Staff member S stated the resident was drowsy and did not want any of the breakfast.Review of resident #94's documented weights showed:-7/22/25 132 lbs.,-8/17/25 121.9 lbs. This represented a 7.65% weight loss over one month.Review of resident #94's medication administration record, on 8/27/25, showed the resident was to be weighed weekly, but there was no documented weight for 8/26/25. Review of resident #94's care plan, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 (#s 21 and 32) of 10 sampled residents, resulting in falls with fractures, and the potential for a fall related to the safe and appropriate use, by a staff member, for the sit-to-stand mechanical lift. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/20/23 at 8:14 a.m., resident #21 was sitting on the side of her bed. Staff member W placed the sit-to-stand mechanical lift against the bed, and placed the mid back strap on the resident, attaching the lift to resident #21. The lift's legs did not fit under the bed, and staff member W was not able to get the lift close enough to get resident #21 to a standing position. Staff member W began moving the sit-to-stand lift in various directions, in attempts to get the lift's legs to move under the bed. Resident #21 was sliding side to side and was attempting to stay on the bed. Resident #21 was lifted into a standing position. Staff member W failed to use the knee straps…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for a resident's change in condition, for 1 (#9) of 10 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of resident #9 not receiving services for his care to prevent further decline. Findings include:During an observation on 4/28/26 at 1:33 p.m., resident #9 was walking in a hallway on the secure care unit, following a housekeeper pushing her cart to his room. Staff member I stated resident #9 wanted to help the housekeeper with work, and he was usually interactive with staff. During an observation on 4/30/26 at 7:05 a.m., resident #9 walked in a hallway on the secure care unit outside of the activities room and stopped to talk with staff member J. Resident #9 asked her about what he could do now. Resident #9 gave staff member J a hug and a kiss on the side of her cheek and continued to talk with staff member J while walking down the hallway. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete and maintain resident documentation for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) assessment prior to admission for 1 (#9) of 3 residents sampled for PASARRs. The deficient practice increased the risk of resident #9 not receiving services for mental disorder or intellectual disability. Findings include:During an observation on 5/4/26 at 8:03 a.m., resident #9 was standing near the nursing station on the secure care unit. Resident #9 walked over to the surveyor standing by the medication cart. Resident #9 smiled and asked what he could do. Resident #9 patted the surveyor's shoulder after talking to the surveyor and walked over to staff member D near the medication cart. Resident #9 lifted his shirt and pointed to the right side of his abdomen, and stated to staff member D, Ouch, this hurts. Resident #9 walked away from the medication cart and followed staff member D as she left the medication cart to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a resident at risk for nutritional deficits was provided a therapeutic diet and had fluids limited as ordered by a provider for 1 (#6) of 4 residents sampled for dialysis. This deficient practice increased resident #6's risk of experiencing hyperkalemia and fluid imbalance as related to end-stage renal (kidney) disease, when she required treatment for hyperkalemia (high level of potassium) and altered mental status resulting in hospitalization. Findings include:Review of resident #6's electronic medical record showed she was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of end-stage renal disease, and pertinent diagnoses including: dependence on renal dialysis, heart failure, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hyperkalemia. During an interview on 5/6/26 at 12:53 p.m., staff member C stated she would review resident records and complete nutritional assessments each week at the facility, spending about eight to ten hours on the work. Staff member C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete an assessment of a resident's health status prior to and after returning from the dialysis center for 2 (#s 2 and 6) of 4 sampled residents receiving dialysis treatments. This deficient practice increased the risk of residents #2 and #6 to experience adverse outcomes related to complications from end-stage renal disease. Findings include:1. Review of resident #2's electronic medical record, dated February 2026, showed an admission date of 2/10/26, with pertinent diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of resident #2's medication administration record, dated February 2026, showed orders initiated on 2/11/26 for weights and pre and post dialysis assessments to be completed every day shift on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.Review of resident #2's electronic medical record showed facility staff failed to obtain resident #2's weight on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff responded to resident needs timely for a resident requiring assistance with activities of daily living for 1 (#4) of 7 sampled residents. The deficient practice increased the risk for adverse psychosocial outcomes and skin integrity issues. The facility identified the failure of staff to respond timely, addressed and corrected the deficient practice before the survey, resulting in the findings of past non-compliance. Findings include:Review of a facility-reported incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 11/5/25, showed resident #4 contacted a family member over a concern about having to wait for staff to assist with personal care. Resident #4's family member attempted to call the facility. The facility did not respond. The family member contacted the local police, who arrived at the facility to do a welfare check on resident #4, due to the facility's lack of response.Review of the facility reported incident's investigative findings, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 11/12/25, showed resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hire and employ a full-time social worker who met the regulatory requirements and to meet the mood, behavioral, emotional, and psychosocial needs of residents. The facility was licensed for 160 beds. Findings include:During an interview on 11/18/25 at 2:35 p.m., staff member A stated that staff member F had been in the social services director position for about three months and held a degree in psychology. Staff member A stated the social services staff member prior to staff member F did not have a degree. Staff member A stated the other staff member who worked in a social services role (staff member E) did not have a degree.During an interview on 11/19/25 at 11:46 a.m., staff member A stated the facility's census had never reached 120 residents. Staff member A stated that since the census had never reached or went over 120, the facility met the social worker regulation with the two staff members in their social services roles. Staff member A stated the facility's census was currently 115, so they were getting a little…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include person-centered information in the resident comprehensive care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs for 2 (#s 1 and 4) of 8 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of resident #4 not having psychosocial needs met, and for staff assisting with resident #1's care to not follow enhanced barrier precautions to prevent infection. Findings include:During an interview on 11/19/25 at 9:50 a.m., staff member I stated nurses who admitted residents would begin a care plan for them. Staff member I stated charge nurses would add information and nursing supervisors as part of the IDT team would add information into resident care plans. Staff member I stated residents admitted to the facility with a foley catheter would have been started on enhanced barrier precautions. Staff member I stated that information would be added to a resident's care plan, to go along with TAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a provider reviewed a resident's total program of care during a single visit with the resident, when the resident fired the physician who left not finalizing the visit, but then no other physicians attempted to finish the assessment, for 1 (#4) of 8 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #4 to be at risk of not receiving medications, treatments, and services for maintaining physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include:During an interview on 11/17/25 at 1:32 p.m., NF1 stated resident #4 fired the male provider who saw her for her initial visit, due to his bedside manner. NF1 stated resident #4 was concerned the provider did not listen to her, and things should have been straightforward to treat her GI issues. NF1 stated resident #4 was concerned that staff member D was dismissive towards her and did not fully hear her out. During an interview on 11/18/25 at 10:16 a.m., staff member D stated he visited residents in the facility who received services through [Hospital Name], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident who requested mental health counseling to receive behavioral health services; when the resident had consistent documentation of emotional behaviors and concerns with her care staff that occurred since the date of admission, for 1 (#4) of 8 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of resident #4's electronic medical record showed resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcohol abuse (in remission). There were no other behavioral health diagnoses listed.During an interview on 11/18/25 at 12:58 p.m., resident #4 stated she went to the facility for rehab services after a hospital stay, due to different medical conditions. Resident #4 stated she saved notes and papers with information she kept from her time in the facility. Resident #4 stated she did not review them since her discharge because it would be retraumatizing. Resident #4 stated she had concerns with how staff treated her from the time she got to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized medically related social services, and accurately and thoroughly assess a resident, for her mood, behavior, and psychosocial status, and the resident displayed mood symptoms and took an antidepressant, displayed anxiety, paranoia, would often refused care, and act out toward others; and the facility failed to ensure her care plan included individualized interventions for care staff to use when the resident did display symptoms or concerns of the mood, behavior, or psychosocial concerns; and she was not referred for mental health services, although this was identified as necessary, for 1 (#4) of 8 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 11/18/25 at 2:35 p.m., staff member F stated she tried to build rapport with resident #4, but resident #4 had a lot of emotional behaviors, and each day could be different. Staff member F stated her past work experience helped her recognize resident #4's mental health behaviors and cycling of emotions. Staff member F stated she notified a staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a wheelchair-accessible grievance box, so residents could submit a grievance independently or anonymously, and the box was not within reach for all the facility residents who used wheelchairs for mobility; and this failure affected 1 (#112) of 26 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 8/26/25 at 4:19 p.m., a grievance box was observed on top of a counter, next to the receptionist's desk, in the main lobby. There was a trash can on the floor in front of the counter, creating a barrier for someone wishing to reach the grievance box. The grievance box had a lid that needed to be pulled down for a resident or person to deposit a grievance form. Staff member G stated she sometimes had to help residents put their grievance forms into the grievance box when they were unable to reach the box themselves, especially if they were in a wheelchair.During an interview on 8/27/25 at 7:52 a.m., staff member A stated he felt any resident in a wheelchair could access the grievance box easily.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident meal trays were served to the residents' rooms in a timely manner and according to the posted mealtimes for 3 (#s 19, 42, and 97) of 26 sampled residents, and it was reported the meals could be lukewarm and residents felt hungry due to having to wait so long for the room trays to be served. Findings include:Review of a facility document, titled Meal Times, not dated, showed: Breakfast 7:30 a.m. through 8:30 a.m.; Lunch 12:00 p.m. through 1:00 p.m.1.During an interview on 8/25/25 at 1:59 p.m., resident #97 stated the food was consistently served thirty minutes late in the resident's rooms. Resident #97 stated he always ate in his room, and his food was often late and was usually lukewarm, which he did not like.During an observation and interview on 8/27/25 at 12:27 p.m., there was no lunch served in resident #97's room, and resident #97 stated, Apparently they're running late. Resident #97 stated he thought lunch was served in the dining room at 12:00 p.m., with the room trays being delivered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect a resident's personal items. The staff cleaned the resident's room, disposing of personal resident items without the resident being present or aware of what was disposed. The lack of respect for the resident's belongings and environment caused the resident frustration, for 1 (#53) of 26 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 8/26/25 at 10:01 a.m., resident #53 was proudly showing off personal items he had collected. There were rocks, some painted and arranged along the windowsill, and a small plant [NAME] he had made from tree branches. Various papers were scattered around the room. The sink was full of apples. There was no smell, and the walkways were clear, therefore, the items in the room did not appear to create a safety hazard at the time.Review of resident #53's care plan, with an initiation date of 7/31/25, showed, Focus: I enjoy spending time in nature-based activities such as picking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the doctor's orders for edema treatment for 2 (#s 12 and 80) of 26 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk for serious complications related to the edema, especially due to their mobility issues. Findings include:1.Resident #12 During an observation on 8/25/25 at 1:22 p.m., resident #12 was sitting in her wheelchair with noticeable swelling in both of her lower legs and feet. Resident #12 was not wearing elastic bandages or compression stockings. Resident #12 stated the swelling in her legs and feet started months ago, and said, The staff do nothing about it since I got here. During an observation on 8/26/25 at 8:48 a.m., resident #12 was in bed, her legs were not elevated, and there were no pillows at the foot of her bed. There were no items available to be used to assist with the resident elevating her leg(s). During an observation on 8/26/25 at 4:36 p.m., resident #12 was sitting in the dining room, and the resident was not wearing elastic bandages or compression stockings.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow doctor's orders for oxygen treatment related to CPAP administration for 1 (#80) and nasal canula administration for 1 (#12); and failed to post an oxygen sign on the door or have full oxygen tanks for 1 (#12) of 26 sampled residents. Findings include:1.Resident #12During an observation and interview on 8/25/25 at 1:22 p.m., the doorway to resident #12's room did not have an oxygen sign posted. Resident #12 was sitting in her wheelchair with a nasal cannula in her nostrils which was connected to an oxygen tank on the back of her wheelchair. The oxygen tank was empty. Resident #12 stated, I think I am supposed to have oxygen on all of the time. There were 11 other oxygen tanks noted in her room. During an interview on 8/25/25 at 1:28 p.m., staff member O stated, Oh, the oxygen tank shouldn't be empty, that's why we have so many tanks in her [resident #12's] room. During an observation on 8/26/25 at 8:48 a.m., resident #12 was resting in bed with no nasal cannula in her nostrils supplying oxygen. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the necessary education to monitor the functionality of the facility's wander guard alarm system for 6 (#s 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14) of 6 residents sampled for wandering and elopement risk. This failure increased the risk for the resident's attempting to elope. Findings include: During an interview on 6/2/25 at 5:00 p.m., staff member I stated she did not know who checked the wander guard alarm system, but she believed it worked because when a resident with a wander guard alarm device would get close to an exit door, the alarm would start to beep. During an interview on 6/3/25 at 9:00 a.m., staff member L stated she had one resident who was an elopement risk and wore a wander guard device. Staff member L stated the facility doors exiting outside to a public area have a wander guard alarm system installed on the door. Staff member L stated it was a facility policy for the system to be installed on all doors exiting the facility. Staff member L stated she was not aware some exit doors in the facility were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation involving a resident who had access to, and went out of, a door which was not alarmed with a wander guard alarm system. The resident left the facility property, accessing a public road, traveling 0.2 miles on foot without staff supervision. The facility failed to identify exit doors not equipped with a wander guard alarm system which would alert staff to redirect a resident prior to exiting an emergency egress door as a hazard for 1 (#1) of 9 sampled residents for wandering and elopement risk. The facility's failure to address these concerns placed this resident, and any others at risk of eloping, at continued risk of imminent harm. Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident, dated 3/28/25, was submitted to the State Survey Agency for an incident involving resident #1 who eloped from the facility. Review of the facility's report of findings, dated 4/2/25, included the following information: Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 3/28/25 at 7:30 p.m. Facility staff identified an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a resident care plan with a new fall intervention identified by the IDT, for 1 (#7) of 9 sampled residents. The failure placed the resident at risk for recurrent falls and injuries. Findings include: Review of resident #7's nursing progress note, dated 5/31/25, showed the resident had an unwitnessed fall. The progress note showed resident #7 was sitting in a chair in the dining room. Resident #7 attempted to scoot forward in the chair, but she slid out, landing on her buttocks. Review of resident #7's current care plan, undated, failed to show a new fall intervention to address why or how the resident slid from her wheelchair, for the resident's fall on 5/31/25, as identified by the IDT. A review of resident #7's IDT event review note, dated 6/4/25, showed, New Interventions suggested following current IDT review: Intervention is redirect resident to the couch to sit in instead of the chairs as she is able to get up off the couch without any difficulty, care plan reviewed and updated. [sic] The intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure meals were served at an appetizing temperature to ensure resident satisfaction for 4 (#s 15, 16, 17 and 18) of 4 sampled residents for food satisfaction. Findings include: During an interview on 3/26/25 at 3:58 p.m., resident #18 stated when meals are served, they are not hot. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 8:33 a.m., staff member I stated she receives complaints from residents that room trays are cold all the time. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 8:47 a.m., resident #15 had just received her breakfast tray and reported her food was cold. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 12:51 p.m., resident #16 had just received her lunch meal in her room and stated she was disappointed because her food was not warm. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 1:25 p.m., resident #17 stated the food which is delivered to resident rooms is mostly cold. Resident #17 reported she often eats yogurt at lunch and more often than not, her yogurt is served warm, and she prefers yogurt to be served cold. A review of resident council minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide equal access to quality care for 1 (#7) of 18 sampled residents. The resident was placed in a room without a sink, bathroom, or call light. The resident slept on a mattress placed on the floor. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 12:05 p.m., NF3 stated she was at the facility on the morning of 3/5/25. NF3 stated she was unable to locate resident #7 in his assigned room. An unknown staff member directed NF3 to the Country Store, located in the secure memory care unit. NF3 stated she found resident #7 lying on a mattress, on the floor, in the Country Store. NF3 stated the lights were turned off and the door was partially closed. NF3 stated the room looked like a storage room of sorts, with no bathroom or call light seen. NF3 stated the staff on the unit told her resident #7 had been sleeping there for a couple of nights because there was not an empty, available, room on the secure unit. NF3 stated she was told the facility had tried to place resident #7 on a regular unit, rather than the secure memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice for a room change, including the reason for the change, for 2 (#s 7 and 8) of 3 residents sampled for room changes. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #7's Census tab in the EHR, viewed on 3/24/25, showed the following room changes for the resident: - 2/25/25, moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER], - 3/5/25, moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]; and, - 3/12/25, moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of resident #7's Assessment tab, viewed on 3/24/25, failed to show a Notification of Room/Roommate Change forms for the 3/5/25 and 3/12/25 room changes. Review of resident #7's Progress Notes tab, viewed on 3/25/25, failed to show any of the room or unit changes which occurred on 2/25/25, 3/5/25, and 3/12/25. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 8:50 a.m., NF1 stated he had been made aware of the room change from the secure memory unit to a regular unit. NF1 stated he was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative when a change in condition necessitating a transfer to a higher level of care for 1 (#1) of 4 residents sampled for appropriate transfer. Findings Include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 11:05 a.m., NF5 stated she was not notified when resident #1 was admitted to an acute care hospital on 2/16/25. NF5 stated she was notified when resident #1 attempted to elope and became very agitated. But was not notified when the decision was made to transfer resident #1 to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. NF5 stated she did not know about the transfer or the admission until another family member arrived at the facility to visit and was told he was in the hospital. Review of resident #1's documents received from the acute care hospital, dated between 2/16/25 and 2/24/25, showed the following: - 2/16/25, History and Physical, increased confusion and agitation, unclear etiology, - 2/17/25, Hospital Progress Note, worsening confusion secondary to steroids, baseline dementia, and dehydration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0918 — isolatedProvide a bathroom in or located near each resident’s room.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident room was equipped with a sink and toilet for 1 (#7) of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 12:05 p.m., NF3 stated she was at the facility on the morning of 3/5/25. NF3 stated she was unable to locate resident #7 in his assigned room. An unknown staff member directed NF3 to the Country Store. located in the secure memory care unit. NF3 stated the room looked like a storage room of sorts, with no sink or bathroom seen. NF3 was told the resident was placed in the Country Store temporarily, and she was not sure how long resident #7 was in the Country Store. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 8:45 a.m., staff member G stated resident #7 did not have a bed or room on the secure unit as they were all occupied. Staff member G stated, on 3/4/25, a message from facility management was relayed to her by the day staff to figure it out and the room situation would be resolved in the morning (3/5/25). Staff member G stated she knew there was no sink or bathroom in the Country…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's sleeping area had functioning call light for 1 (#7) of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 12:05 p.m., NF3 stated she was at the facility on the morning of 3/5/25 and was unable to locate resident #7 in his assigned room. An unknown staff member directed NF3 to the Country Store. located in the secure memory care unit. NF3 stated the Country Store looked like a storage room of sorts. NF3 stated she noted there was no call light for the resident, who was lying on a mattress on the floor. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 8:45 a.m., staff member G stated resident #7 was in the secure memory unit during the day on 3/4/25 and 3/5/25. Staff member G stated resident #7 did not have a bed or room on the unit as they were all occupied. Staff member G stated, on 3/4/25, a message from facility management was relayed to her by the day staff to figure it out and the room situation would be resolved in the morning (3/5/25). Staff member G stated she knew there was no call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication was limited to 14 days for 1 (#49) of one sampled resident and failed to ensure an adequate indication of use for an antipsychotic for 1 (#99) of 1 sampled resident. Findings include: Review of resident #49's March 2024 Medication Administration Report, showed resident #49 was started on routine Diazepam 2 mg (milligram) oral tablet one time a day for anxiety. In addition, resident #49 could also receive Diazepam 1 mg by mouth every twenty-four hours as needed for six hours after the scheduled dose. This psychotropic medication was ordered approximately every fourteen days for more than eight months. Review of resident #49's Treatment Administration Record dated 10/2024, showed the resident was assessed as a zero or no signs of anxiety during shifts when resident #49 received the as needed dose of diazepam. Review of resident #49's pharmacy drug regimen review dated 8/21/24, showed the pharmacy had identified the resident was receiving, Diazepam 2 mg every day since 3/2024 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to employ a Certified Dietary Manager, to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services, for the facility. This failure increased the risk of negative outcomes for all residents residing at the facility and receive nutritional services. Findings include: During the initial observation of the kitchen, on 7/15/24 at 12:25 p.m., concerns with employee hygiene supplies (beard covers and soap), soiled kitchen equipment, improper food storage, cleanliness of the dietary department, and pest control, were identified (refer to F812, F908, and F925 for more information). During an interview on 7/16/24 at 3:00 p.m., staff member E stated, We (the facility) have a contract dietician that comes every other week. I have never met her. She is available for me to call if I have questions. I have only been in this position for about three months. I am currently enrolled in a Certified Food Manager program, but I haven't had the time to complete it, due to my working in the kitchen so much. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 3:21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained throughout the kitchen, and the dietary storage areas. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff wore beard coverings while serving food, failed to label and date food items in the walk-in cooler, failed to maintain a clean (dietary/kitchen) environment, and failed to have appropriate pest control. This deficient practice had the potential to cause foodborne illness to all who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 7/15/24 at 12:25 p.m., the following observations were made: - There were no paper towels or soap in the soap dispensers, located near the two sinks, used for washing hands prior to entering the kitchen. - A wall vent in the dry storage area had black drip marks running from it. - There was grease and dirt buildup on the handles to the gas stove. - Grease and grime was built up under the grill and around the table it was on. - Mouse droppings were observed in the dry storage area, and the chemical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, correct, and monitor quality-deficient practices effectively related to the kitchen cleanliness and pest control using the QAPI program. This failure increased the risk of negative outcomes for any resident who received food and or services from the dietary department. Findings include: Observations during the initial brief tour of the kitchen on 7/15/24 at 12:25 p.m. showed: - Grease and dust buildup were observed on the handles of the stove burners. - Grease was built up under the grill and around the area of the stove. - The oven that was nonfunctional had a box of gloves and a long lighter stored in them. - The microwave had debris and dirt in and underneath it. - There was a puddle of water on the kitchen floor, and no wet floor sign was present. - Mouse droppings were observed on the floor in the food storage area and the chemical storage area. - A thick layer of black dirt and mouse droppings went all the way around the storage areas along the floor at the bottom of the walls. - A bag of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure pest control in the kitchen, 200 and 300 halls, and a resident room for 1 (#65) of 43 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents served food from the kitchen, and all residents residing on the 200 and 300 halls. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/15/24 at 12:48 p.m., an ant was observed crawling on the floor to the right of resident #65's recliner, among crumbs. During an observation on 7/16/24 at 8:02 a.m., dead insects were scattered in multiple places on the floor in the 300 hallway. During an observation on 7/16/24 at 4:20 p.m., a beetle was crawling to the right of room [ROOM NUMBER] in the hallway, and a beetle was crawling near the exit doors in the 200 unit. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 9:02 a.m., staff member K stated he had observed ants in the facility. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 9:25 a.m., staff member L said bugs flew through the residents' screenless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to invite residents to care plan meetings for 4 (#s 21, 63, 89, and 91) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 11:19 a.m., resident #89 stated, The staff come and tell me they are going to have a care meeting, but they either never have one or something, because I haven't gone to the meetings. Review of resident #89's EHR showed there was no evidence the resident had been invited to the care plan meetings. 2. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 9:51 a.m., resident #63 said he was not invited to any care plan meetings. Resident #63 stated he would like to go to the meetings to provide input into his care. Review of resident #63's social services care plan invitation information showed the last documented care plan invitation was on 12/12/23. 3. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 8:49 a.m., resident #21 said she had not gone to a care plan meeting in eight or nine months. Resident #21 said she would like to go to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for 3 (#s 32, 63, and 89); and failed to consistently clean the 300 hallway and resident rooms for 2 (#s 39 and 65) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 7/15/24 at 2:55 p.m., resident #89 stated she had told the facility staff there were bugs in her room. Resident #89 said the management gave her bug spray to kill the bugs when she saw them. During an observation and interview on 7/16/24 at 10:26 a.m., a large spider was seen on the floor by the sitting room on unit one. Staff member O stepped on and killed the spider. Staff member O said she just saw small bugs on the floor in the sitting room on unit one. 2. During an observation on 7/15/24 at 2:15 p.m., resident #63 stated his bathroom was dirty and told the surveyor not to walk in there because the floor was so dirty. Observation of the bathroom showed a brown build-up stain around the edges of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications were properly disposed of or destroyed for 2 (#s 6 and 318) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation of medications in the medication cart, on 7/17/24 at 10:20 a.m., an Insulin Aspart FlexPen was found with a label for resident #6 on it. Resident #6 was discharged from the facility on 7/11/24. During an observation of medications in the medication cart, on 7/17/24 at 10:40 a.m., three (3) Insulin Lispro KwikPens, labeled for resident #318, were found. Resident #318 was discharged from the facility on 7/1/24. The following medications were found stored in the medication cart for the TCU, with either partially removed, illegible labels, or no labels: - Four (4) Insulin Lispro KwikPens, - One (1) Victoza injector pen, - Four (4) Levemir FlexPens, - One (1) Humalog KwikPen, - Five (5) Admelog SoloStar insulin pens, - One (1) Insulin Aspart FlexPen, and - One (1) Lantus Solostar pen. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 10:42 a.m., staff member Q was asked what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent, for 2 (#s 37 and 309) of 43 sampled residents. The medication error rate calculated to 11.54 percent, and there were multiple errors made for each resident, increasing the risk of a negative outcome. Findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation, on 7/17/24 at 8:12 a.m., staff member G prepared medications for administration to resident #37. Staff member G gave the resident one tablet of calcium 600 mg with vitamin D 10 mcg, one half tablet of vitamin D 10 mcg, and one tablet of a multivitamin with minerals. Review of resident #37's MAR, dated 7/17/24, showed the following medication orders: - order date 4/24/21, calcium carbonate 600 mg tablet once a day, - order date 4/24/21, vitamin D3 1000 IU (25 mcg) tablet once a day, and - order date 4/24/21, multiple vitamin one tablet once a day. When the medications administered were compared to the medications documented as given, the medication observation showed the resident received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to enable the residents to maintain their highest practicable level of functioning for 1 (#16) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 7/16/24 at 9:34 a.m., resident #16 was sitting in his electric wheelchair. Resident #16 was observed to attempt to reposition himself using his hands and forearms. During the 10-minute conversation, resident #16 was observed attempting to reposition himself four times, using both hands and forearms. Review of resident #16's nurse progress notes, dated 6/10/24, showed resident #16 was, . having pain in his left wrist, was favoring his wrist, and not using it as much. The nurse progress note showed the medical provider would be notified. Review of a facility document titled, Billings Clinic Outreach Services, dated 6/11/24, showed the provider identified resident #16's motorized wheelchair armrest did not accommodate the length of his left forearm. The provider note showed resident #16 had to make frequent position…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by a staff member, for 2 (#s 304 and 305) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a Facility-Reported Incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency, dated 3/22/24, showed resident #s 304 and 305 reported NF4 was rough with them during a transfer and when providing ADL assistance. The report showed NF4 was immediately suspended pending the completion of the investigation. Review of resident #304's investigative file, dated 3/22/24, showed the resident reported NF4 came in to provide care and asked her to move her right leg. When resident #304 told NF4 she could not move it, he grabbed her leg to turn her to her side. Resident #304 also reported NF4 used the word diaper when assisting with incontinence care. Resident #304 reported she felt the use of that word was degrading. Later on 3/22/24, resident #304 reported she was having right knee and leg pain. Resident #304 stated she did not want NF4 caring for her anymore. Review of resident #305's investigative file, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a concave mattress as a potential restraint and did not complete a risk assessment, consent, or monitoring for 1 (#88) of 2 residents sampled for restraints. Findings include: During an observation on 7/15/24 at 3:15 p.m., a concave mattress was observed on resident #88's bed. Resident #88 was not in the room at the time of observation. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 8:12 a.m., staff member B reported resident #88 had a concave mattress on his bed, . to keep him from falling out of bed. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 9:50 a.m., staff member U stated the concave mattress was on resident #88's bed, . because I think he kept getting up and would fall. Review of resident #88's care plan, showed the following entry on 11/29/23: I am at risk for falls/injuries r/t fracture from fall at home, medication use, change in BP . Scoop (concave) mattress is to be provided. [sic] Review of resident #88's medical record failed to show documentation of a restraint risk assessment, written consent, or monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an effective process for providing foot care to diabetic residents for 1 (#91) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 7/15/24 at 3:33 p.m., resident #91 stated her toenails were very long and starting to curl over. Resident #91's toenails were observed to be long and curling at the top. Resident #91 stated she did not recall them being cut since she came to the facility on 3/11/24. During an interview on 7/15/24 at 3:55 p.m., NF1 stated, I wish [#91] could be seen by a podiatrist. The staff won't touch her nails due to her health conditions. I don't feel comfortable doing it myself either. I know that her nails are bothering her. I'm not sure if it's my responsibility to set up those appointments or if it is the facility's responsibility. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:42 p.m., staff member I stated Social Services coordinated with the facility scheduler to schedule appointments for the residents. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 2:00 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to identify the risk of a trip hazard by using a twin-size scoop mattress as a bedside fall mat for 1 (#91); and failed to protect a resident from hazardous materials for 1 (#89) of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 7/15/24 at 3:33 p.m., a twin-size scoop mattress was observed next to resident #91's roommate's bed. Resident #91 stated, That mat over there (pointing across the room) is so big and (staff) often put on my side of the room. I have seen a housekeeping staff member trip over it; luckily, she didn't get hurt. I have almost tripped over it myself. The staff put it on my side of the room when they were helping my roommate, and then I couldn't get to the restroom. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 3:07 p.m., staff member U stated, I think they use the mattresses for falls. It does make it hard to perform cares because it is so big and hard to move. There really isn't anywhere to put it when we do have to get the residents up. I do think it could cause an accident. It's just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was found facility administration failed to hire and employ a Dietary Manager with appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the necessary functions of the food and nutritional services; and the facility dietitian did not schedule regular consultations and go onsite to work with the dietary manager and assist with oversight of nutritional services. This failure resulted in numerous concerns being identified in the dietary department (Refer fo F825. Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen, on 7/15/24 at 12:25 p.m., showed: - A staff member was observed serving the lunch meal and not wearing a covering over their beard. - Grease and dust buildup was observed on the handles of the stove burners. - Grease was built up under the grill and around the area of the stove. - The ovens that were nonfunctional had a box of gloves and a long lighter stored in them. - The microwave had debris and dirt in it and underneath it. - There was a puddle of water on the kitchen floor and no wet floor sign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed when performing wound care and medication administration through a feeding tube, for 1 (#86) of 1 sampled resident; and failed to repair a worn recliner, resulting in an uncleanable surface, for 1 (#65) of 43 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the transmission of infectious agents for the residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 7/17/24 at 11:16 a.m., staff member H was observed providing a wound treatment to resident #86's sacral pressure ulcer. Staff member H did not wear a gown when performing care on this wound. Staff member H said gowns would only need to be worn for tube feedings and catheters. When asked directly, staff member H said she would not need a gown with pressure ulcers because there would not be a splash onto the nurse. During an observation and interview on 7/17/24 at 1:20 p.m., staff member H said staff would wear a gown for tube feeding and catheter care. Staff member H…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and proper operation of the kitchen equipment (the oven, dessert refrigerator, cooks' refrigerator, and ice machine). This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident receiving food from the kitchen when the equipment is used for the preparation or storage of food. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 7/15/24 at 12:25 p.m., there were no paper towels in the dispensers, located near the two sinks, outside of the kitchen, in the serving area. The ice machine was warm, and there was no ice present. Kitchen staff stated the ice machine did not work. The dessert refrigerator was warm, and there were several cans of unopened V8 juice in it. During an observation and interview on 7/16/24 at 2:12 p.m., there were still no paper towels in the dispensers near the two sinks in the serving area. The ice machine was still not working. The dessert refrigerator was still warm and not working. The ovens below the gas stove were not working and were being used for storage.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices for transmission-based precautions during a COVID-19 outbreak for 1 (#11) of 15 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the increased potential to spread COVID -19 in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 10/25/23 at 7:40 a.m., a room off of the main entrance, and close to the dining room, had the doors open, and a printed sign which showed, employees only. Five used BINAX COVID-19 test swabs were on the counter. A trash can had a red biohazard liner and testing materials, gloves, and paper towels had overflowed on to the floor. During an observation on 10/25/23 at 9:10 a.m., the five BINAX COVID-19 swabs remained on the countertop, and used testing materials remained on the floor, overflowing the trash can. During an observation and interview on 10/25/23 at 10:45 a.m., staff member J was standing in the doorway of resident #11's room. The door was open to the hallway and staff member J was talking to the staff member inside resident #11's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, nursing staff failed to respect a resident's dignity by drawing a smiley face on a resident's buttocks when providing care for 1 (#10) of 15 sampled residents; failed to speak to a resident with respect while assisting with care for 1 (#12) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility reported incident, dated 9/3/23, showed a smiley face was discovered on resident #10's left buttock/hip area, when providing cares. Resident #10 was not upset about the incident and could not provide information on the incident. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 10:26 a.m., staff member N said she had checked resident #10's brief at 7:45 a.m. and it did not need to be changed, it was dry. Staff member N said she did not remove the brief to check, she just checked to see if the line on the brief had changed colors to indicate the brief was wet. Staff member N said residents were checked every two hours, and she had not checked resident #10 until she was asked to assist staff member O with resident #10, when the smiley face was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain verbal or written consent, or complete an explanation of risks versus benefits with a resident's POA prior to giving an anti-psychotic medication, for 1 (#12) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of resident #12's physician's order showed an order had been placed on 10/25/23 at 7:11 p.m., for haloperidol 1 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation and Give 2 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation. Resident #12's medication administration record showed, resident #12 received haloperidol (Haldol) on 10/26/23 at 1:37 a.m. A review of resident #12's electronic medical record showed, no documentation was present for the risks versus benefits or documentation of a consent for the administration of an anti-psychotic medication was received from resident #12's POA prior to the medication administration. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:00 a.m., staff member B stated the interdisciplinary team does the risks and benefits for psychotropic medications. Staff member B stated nurses have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had her call light with in reach for 1 (#10) of 15 sampled resident. This deficient practice caused the resident to yell out for help instead of using the call light. Findings include: A review of a facility reported incident to the State Survey Agency, dated 10/2/23, showed resident #10 was concerned about her cares, and having access to her call light and bedside table which contained her personal items. The report showed staff had been educated by staff members A and C on ensuring the resident's call light was accessible and with in reach. A review of a written staff statement in regard to the Facility Reported Incident on 10/2/23, showed: [Staff Name] and I went into [Resident #10's] room to check on her .call light was on the floor. During an observation and interview on 10/25/23 at 2:45 p.m., resident #10 was lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. Her head was positioned by the upper left corner of the bed and her feet were positioned by the lower right corner of the bed. Resident #10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a facility reported incident thoroughly for a resident found, during cares, to have a smiley face on her buttock, and implement protective measures for the resident, for 1 (#10) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility reported incident, dated 9/3/23, showed a smiley face was discovered on resident #10's left buttock/hip area, when providing cares. Resident #10 was not upset and laughed about the incident. Resident #10 was not aware of the smiley face and did not know how it had happened. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 10:26 a.m., staff member N said she had checked resident #10's brief at 7:45 a.m. and it had not needed to be changed, it was dry. Staff member N said she had not removed the brief to check, she just checked to see if the line on the brief had changed colors to indicate the brief was wet. Staff member N said residents were checked every two hours and she had not checked resident #10 until she was asked to assist staff member O. The smiley face was found at that time on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to limit an as needed anti-psychotic medication order to 14 days for 1 (#12) of 15 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of resident #12's electronic medical record showed a physician's order, dated 10/25/23, for Haloperidol tablet 1 mg. Give 1 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation and Give 2 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation. No stop date was identified on the medication order. Haloperidol is the generic name for Haldol, an antipsychotic. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:00 a.m., staff member B stated, PRN psychotropic medications were tracked by the interdisciplinary team every day to make sure there were proper diagnosis and time frames in place. A review of resident #12's medication administration record, dated 10/26/23, showed resident #12 had received haloperidol 2 mg by mouth at 1:37 a.m. A review of a facility document titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, showed: .12. Psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on a PRN basis unless that medication is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a clean homelike environment, and clean bugs out of light fixtures, for 2 (#s 44 and 85), and the soiled light fixtures were noticed by the two residents; one specifically felt the bugs were creepy. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/20/23 at 7:40 a.m., the dome shaped lighting fixtures in the Sapphire unit hallway had numerous dead insects in them. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 8:05 a.m., resident #44 said the hallway lighting fixtures were, full of dead bugs and it is kind of creepy. During an interview on 6/21/23 at 10:26 a.m., resident #85 said the lighting fixtures in the Sapphire hallway needed to be cleaned out because there was a ton of dead bugs in them. During an observation on 6/21/23 at 12:00 p.m., the lighting fixtures in the Sapphire unit hallway continued to have numerous dead insects in them. During an interview on 6/21/23 at 12:04 p.m., staff member G said the maintenance department was responsible for cleaning the lighting fixtures in the hallways of the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to assist with resident care needs, with respect to answering call lights in a timely manner, for 8 (#s 26, 29, 60, 89, 93, 98, 158, and 159) of 20 sampled residents; and, failed to provide showers as scheduled for 10 (#s 6, 25, 26, 29, 44, 45, 60, 89, 93, and 98) of 20 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 8:15 a.m., resident #60 stated, There isn't enough help at night. I take insulin between 9:00 p.m. and 9:30 p.m., and sometimes it's pretty late if they don't have enough help. Sometimes we don't get showers because there isn't enough help, or they pull the scheduled help to work somewhere else. During the interview, staff member O walked in to greet the resident. Resident #60 stated, Where have you been? Staff member O responded, I have been pulled to another wing again, but hopefully I will be back soon. As she left, resident #60 stated, She (staff member O) is our bath aide, and this is exactly why people don't get showers on a regular basis here. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain proper hand hygiene practices for 3 (#s 20, 21 & 70) of 5 sampled residents; clean and disinfect sit-to-stand lifts after use for 2 (# 20 and 21) of 2 sampled residents; failed to maintain a documented infection prevention surveillance program; failed to maintain a water management program to minimize the growth and spread of waterborne pathogens; and, failed to address unsanitary conditions in resident bathrooms, for 3 (#s 35, 45, and 89) of 7 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/20/23 at 8:14 a.m., resident #21's call light was on, and she was loudly asking to get up. Staff member V stated she still could not find her CNA. Resident #21 stated she had to meet someone in less than an hour. Resident #21 stated, I need help to get up. Staff member V told resident #21, I'll go find your CNA, your lights on, right? Resident #21 stated, I need to meet physical therapy at 9, I'm not worried about breakfast. At 8:20 a.m., staff member W arrived in resident #21's room. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS Assessment, for 1 (#105) of 2 sampled residents, who received hospice services. Findings include: Review of resident #105's medical record showed a physician order, dated [DATE], ordering hospice services for resident #105. Review of resident #105's medical record showed no MDS updates from [DATE] through [DATE]. Review of resident #105's medical record showed an MDS entry on [DATE] with coding reflecting the resident was deceased . During an interview on [DATE] at 12:45 p.m., staff member N stated a Significant Change MDS Assessment was not completed for resident #105. Staff member N also stated she did not recall why the Significant Change MDS was not completed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent in providing care and services for 1 (#108) of 2 sampled residents to prevent the worsening of facility aquired pressure ulcers; and failed to ensure direct care staff had the education to address cleanliness of resident bathrooms and for necessary cleaning, for 1 (#35) if 2 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #108's EMR, dated 4/10/23 to 5/18/23, showed staff member H was in charge of pressure ulcer care and treatment for the resident during his stay in the facility. Resident #108 developed seven pressure ulcers after he was admitted on [DATE]. The pressure ulcers worsened, and the resident's overall condition deteriorated. Resident #108 passed away on 5/18/23. During an interview on 6/21/23 at 4:30 p.m., staff member A stated [staff member H] had been suspended and removed from the position. Staff member A stated the facility had made attempts to address staff member H's wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$142,698 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $19,635 — penalty dated 2026-05-06
- $23,600 — penalty dated 2026-05-06
- $87,019 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
- $12,444 — penalty dated 2025-06-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-02 for 47 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALDWELL, SARAH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 06/01/2023 |
| BEWSEY, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/01/2023 |
| MONROE, DUSTIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/01/2023 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275029. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.