San Antonio North Nursing and Rehabilitation
501 Ogden, San Antonio, TX 78212 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (210) 225-4588 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,268 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-28)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.4% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.2% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.8% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.29 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.7–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 103.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.67 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #1) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan, in that: LVN A failed to follow the plan of care on 05/01/2024 which required Resident #1 to be monitored and a PCP to be notified if Resident demonstrated a fear of being alone. Resident #1 attempted suicide on 05/02/2024. This failure resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 05/26/2024 at 06:00 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 05/28/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility's need to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. This failure could result in residents not receiving the necessary care to prevent a decline in health due to failure to follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-28 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 13 residents reviewed for psychosocial concerns. LVN A failed to put interventions in place or promptly arrange for psychiatric services for Resident #1 after he displayed increased signs of fear on 05/01/2024. Resident #1 attempted suicide on 05/02/2024. This failure resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 05/26/2024 at 06:00 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 05/28/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility's need to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. This failure to ensure interventions were implemented or psychiatric services were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-19 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was safely discharged to a homeless shelter on 8/15/23. Resident #1's whereabouts remained unknown until 8/18/23, when he was found at a local park. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 8/18/23 at 6:32 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 8/19/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm with a scope identified as a isolated until interventions were put in place to ensure residents were discharged safely. These failures could place residents at risk of being discharged without preparation, causing a disruption in their care and services and denying them a voice regarding their treatment plan. The findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering, in that: Resident #1 eloped from the facility, traveled approximately 1.5 miles away from the facility and required medical treatment in emergency room for hypokalemia [low potassium] and hypotension [low blood pressure]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/03/2023 at 4:41 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 08/05/2023 at 6:34 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy and a scope of isolated. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm, serious injury, or death. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/04/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: [Metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for medications. Facility nurses did not update Resident #1's physician order regarding Acetaminophen Capsule 500 mg - Give 2 capsules by mouth three times a day for chronic pain - Give with Tramadol when the resident's primary care physician changed the resident's Tramadol from schedule medication to PRN (as needed for pain) medication on 06/04/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic doses of their medication. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/23/2026, revealed the resident was a 66-years-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic systolic heart failure (specific type of heart failure that occurs in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 (Resident #1 and #2) out of 8 residents reviewed for medical records in that: 1. Facility wound care nurse did not document in Resident #1's treatment administration record and nursing progress note on 06/02/2026 scheduled wound care date. 2. Facility staff did not document details of a facility reported incident that reportedly occurred on 6/8/2026 at 10:10am in Resident #2's electronic health record. Theses failures could place residents at risk for missed treatment and medications which could result in decline in healing and well-being. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/23/2026, revealed the resident was a 66-years-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic systolic heart failure (specific type of heart failure that occurs in the heart's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of and participate in his or her treatment including the right to be fully informed in language that he or she understood of his or her health status, including his or her medical condition for 1 of 1 resident (resident #3) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to have an effective method of communication with Resident #3 who was deaf and mute This failure could place residents at risk of poor communication and a demoralized sense of self-esteem and psychosocial wellbeing. The findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/29/2026, revealed an admission date of 01/27/2025, and a readmission date of 03/27/2026, with diagnoses that included: Paraplegia (impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities.), Type 2 diabetes mellitus ((high level of sugar in the blood), Focal traumatic brain injury (brain trauma in which damage is confined to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure ADON A wore a gown while providing wound care for Resident #3 who was on enhanced barrier precaution. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/29/2026, revealed an admission date of 01/27/2025, and a readmission date of 03/27/2026, with diagnoses that included: Paraplegia (impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities.), Type 2 diabetes mellitus ((high level of sugar in the blood), Focal traumatic brain injury (brain trauma in which damage is confined to a specific area of the brain, rather than affecting multiple regions), Chronic ulcer of right lower leg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse, to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an allegation of Resident #1 being sexually abused by three unknown men in the facility on 4/1/16. This failure could place residents at risk for harm to include sexual abuse, a diminished quality of life, and psychosocial harm.The findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 4/14/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: schizoaffective disorder (chronic mental health condition cauterized by hallucinations and delusions), bi-polar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resolution of grievances. The facility failed to document, address, and attempted to resolve 11 grievances made by Resident #2 on:1/2/2026 at 11:49 AM.1/2/2026 at 12:06 PM.1/2/2026 at 1:33 PM.3/3/2026 at 11:56 AM.3/4/2026 at 9:39 AM.3/5/2026 at 12:31 PM.3/12/2026 at 2:29 PM.3/17/2026 at 5:08 PM.3/19/2026 at 12:01 PM.3/24/2026 at 5:12 PM.3/26/2026 at 8:33 AM. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial and physical decline by not having their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration dates for 2 of the facility's 5 medication carts (1 cart for the 200-hall and 1 cart for the 400-hall) reviewed for medication storage. The Medication Aide 200-hall medication cart had 4 pill form medications stored in a small plastic cup and not in pharmacy labeled containers.The Nurse 400-hall medication cart had 3 pill form medications stored in a small plastic cup and not in pharmacy labeled containers. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medication. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 4/3/2026 at 3:40 PM MA I attended her medication cart on the 200-hall. MA I stated she was in the process of administering medications for residents on the 200-hall. MA I stated she had intended to administer medications for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of and participate in his or her treatment including the right to be fully informed in language that he or she understood of his or her health status, including his or her medical condition for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to have an effective method of communicating with Resident #1 who was deaf and mute. This failure could place residents at risk of poor communication and a demoralized sense of self-esteem and psychosocial wellbeing.The findings include: A record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an admission date of 1/27/2025 with diagnoses which included deaf non-speaking, unspecified focal traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a chronic mental health condition combining psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) with manic and often depressive mood episodes). A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for reporting alleged violations. On 2/22/2026 the facility failed to report to the State Agency an allegation of sexual abuse when a hospice RN alleged Resident #3 was sexually abused.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress, and reported the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate corrective actions were taken for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. On 2/22/2026 the facility failed to investigate and report the results of the investigation to the State Agency an allegation of sexual abuse when a hospice RN alleged Resident #3 was sexually abused. This failure could place residents at risk of harm by ANE and a diminished sense of self-worth.Findings included:A record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 4/3/2026 revealed an admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for 1 of 6 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the care plan included instructions necessary for implementing communication interventions with Resident #1 who was deaf and mute. This failure could place residents at risk of harm due to poor communication.The findings include: A record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an admission date of 1/27/2025 with diagnoses which included deaf non-speaking, unspecified focal traumatic brain injury,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 5 residents medication carts (200-hall medication cart) reviewed for food safety. The facility stored resident's pudding and jelly in the Resident's medication cart without labels and dates to indicate if the foods were safe to serve. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 4/3/2026 at 3:08 PM LVN D was at his medication cart preparing to administer medications for his assigned residents. The medication cart presented with a covered 1-gallon water pitcher filled with water. The water pitcher had no label to identify when the water was poured. LVN D demonstrated the first drawer where he stored a clear plastic cup with a lid which held approximately 2 ounces of pudding and another similar clear plastic cup with jelly. The containers had no labels and dates to indicate what the contents were or when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's room was clean, sanitary and did not have a strong smell of urine. This failure could place residents at risk of living in unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable conditions which could lead to a decline of mental and physical health and decreased social interactions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 02.13.2026, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on 10.03.2024 with diagnoses of Acute Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Muscle Weakness and the Need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's MDS, dated 2.2.2026, revealed Resident #1 has a BIMS of 15. MDS also revealed that Resident #1 sometimes refuses care 1-3 days a week, and substantial assist to the toilet. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, last revision 2.2.2026, revealed Resident #1 suffers from incontinence related to impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike for 3 of 3 residents' rooms observed for electricity and 3 of 3 residents affected (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3).Rooms #10 (Resident #3), #11 (Resident #1), and #12 (Resident #2) had no over the bed lights and electrical issues with other electronics.This failure could place residents at risk a lack of comfort, risk for falls, and a diminished quality of life in the facility. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/7/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses: major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, traumatic brain injury, and PTSD.Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 12/3/2025 revealed he was care planned for PTSD, traumatic brain injury, and risk for falls.Record review of Resident #1's QMDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 14, indicative of cognitively intact.Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the rights of the residents to be from from abuse for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse.Resident # 6 was abused by LVN B.Resident #7 was abused by LVN B.Resident #8 was abused by LVN B.These failures could place residents at risk of more abuse and diminish their quality of life.Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 1.6.2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted on 3.1.2019 with diagnoses: anxiety disorder, hypertensive heart disease without failure (high blood pressure that causes structural changes to the heart), and major depressive disorder.Record review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 12.10.2025 revealed she was care planned for major depressive disorder, anxiety, and fall precautions due to dizziness and giddiness. Record review of Resident #8's AMDS dated 12.16.2025 revealed she had a BIMS score of 13, indicative of no cognitive impairment.Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 1.8.2026 revealed a 66…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1of 1 facilities.The facility failed to ensure Staff Member A had an MA certificate from [DATE] to [DATE] for a total of 88 shifts and passed medications to residents.This failure could place residents at risk of medication errors, inaccurate assessment, and illness.The findings were: Record review of the staff roster provided by the facility on [DATE] revealed Staff Member A's title was LVN. Record review of Staff Member A's employee file revealed a hire date of [DATE] as a MA. Review of the Texas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician must document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to document review and response to irregularities identified in Resident #1's medication regimen in August and September 2025. This failure could result in unintended effects of medications and/or illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/08/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included intentional self-harm by unspecified firearm discharge and other chronic pain. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, submitted 8/5/2025, reflected a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Section N0415 reflected Resident #1 was taking opioid medication. Section N2001 (did a complete drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for two of seven residents (Resident # 41 and Resident #2) reviewed for privacy. 1.The facility failed to ensure MA B locked the computer, after he walked away and left the computer unattended, which exposed Resident #41's morning medication list. 2.The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtains in Resident #2's room were able to completely close around his bed to provide Resident #2 privacy during wound care. These failures could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and of loss of personal privacy, causing residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected. The findings include: 1.Record review of Resident # 41's face sheet dated 07/30/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 41 had diagnoses that included: Schizophrenia (is a severe and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 (Residents #52 and #87) of 30 residents reviewed, in that: 1. The bathroom door facing the interior of the bathroom used by Resident #52 had scrape marks and the lower section of the door was unpainted. 2. The entrance to the bathroom used by Resident #87 had a 3inch rust area on the left door post and the toilet was not secured to the floor base. These failures could result in residents not having a safe, clean, homelike environment which could result in low self esteem and a diminished quality of life. The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #52's face sheet, dated 7/29/25, revealed the [AGE] year resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: expressive language disorder( a condition that affects a person's ability to use language), essential hypertension( a condition characterized by high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facility in that: 1. The facility failed to replace dirty overhead ceiling tiles in the main kitchen area. 2. The facility failed to replace a light bulb fixture in the main kitchen area. 3. The facility failed to clean an overhead ceiling vent in the dish room. 4. The facility failed to repair a wall penetration and broken floor molding in the employee bathroom in the main kitchen area. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 07/28/25 from 9:15am until 9:35am with the Food Service Director revealed the following: a. There were 6 ceiling tiles which each measured approximately 2x2 ft in the main kitchen area that had dirt particles on the surface and were stained.b. There was a missing florescent light bulb in a overhead ceiling light fixture which measured approximately 4x2 ft in length in the main kitchen area.c. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #11) of 25 residents reviewed for clinical records, in that: Resident #11's Medication Administration Record, dated July 2025, had blank spaces on July 5, 2025 rather than documentation. This deficient practice could cause miscommunication among the resident's caregivers and result in improper care.The findings were: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 07/31/2025, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Essential Primary Hypertension, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Record review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition.Record review of Resident #11's care plan, revised 05/17/2024, revealed [Resident #11] receives anti-anxiety medications r/t anxiety. Administer ANTI-ANXIETY medications as ordered by physician. Observe for side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 Maintenance and Housekeeping Office reviewed, in that: The Maintenance and Housekeeping Office, in which were stored tools and cleaning equipment, was observed with the door ajar and no staff in attendance. This deficient practice could result in residents, staff, or the public coming into contact with tools and cleaning equipment that were unsafe. The findings were: Observation on 05/21/2025 at 9:15 a.m. revealed the Maintenance and Housekeeping Office was located on the facility's second floor, was the first room of a hallway with resident room, was adjacent from the nurses' desk, and across the hall from a resident room. Further observation revealed the office door was ajar and no staff were in the office. Further observation revealed Housekeeper E was in the hallway between the Maintenance and Housekeeping Office and a resident's room. During an interview with Housekeeper E on 05/21/2025 at 9:15 a.m., Housekeeper E confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was not left sitting in urine in a chair in the dining room on the evening of 05/18/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown and infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record dated 05/23/2025 revealed she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Moderate Intellectual Disability (a condition that limits intelligence, defined as IQ between 36-51 and disrupts ability necessary for independent living) and Anxiety Disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that our out of proportion to the situation). Record review of Resident #2's admission and baseline care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintaining medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's completion or refusal of prescribed wound care was accurately documented on her Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 4 (4/11/2025, 4/18/2025, 4/29/2025 and 5/2/2025) of 14 treatment days between 04/01/2025 through 05/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 05/20/2025, revealed she was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Chronic Systolic (congestive) Heart Failure (chronic condition where heart does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 4 medication carts (Med Cart 1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Med Cart 1 was locked while unattended on 5/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings included: Observation on 5/11/25 at 10:07 am revealed Med Cart 1 was in front of the nurses', across from the elevator on the second floor. Further observation revealed Med Cart 1 was unlocked and contained OTC medications and supplies in the first draw and resident medications in the second drawer. Further observation revealed one resident sitting in a chair close to the nurses' station, another resident walking past the nurses' station, five residents in the TV room located next to the nurses' station, the housekeeper, and CNA A. At 10:09 am a resident was observed as he wheeled himself in his wheelchair toward Med Cart 1 and placed his right hand on Med Cart 1 as he wheeled by it. During an interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24- hour emergency dental care to meet the needs of 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dental services in that: The facility did not assist Resident #1 with obtaining dental services when her top dentures were reported missing on 9/29/24 . This failure could place residents at risk of not having their oral health care needs met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Cerebral infarction (is a medical condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted), kidney disease (is a condition where the kidneys are damaged and cannot function properly), and Dementia (condition that cause a progressive decline in cognitive function, memory, and behavior). Record review of Resident #1's inventory sheet, 9/10/24 , revealed Resident #1 had a top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 37 residents (Residents #3, #6, and #8) reviewed for reasonable accommodations, in that: 1. Resident #3 had no access to her call light that was observed on the floor approximately four feet away from Resident #3. 2. Resident # 6 had no access to his call light that was observed on the floor behind the headboard of Resident #6's bed. 3. Resident #8 had no access to his call light that was observed on the floor approximately five feet away from Resident #8. This deficient practice could place residents not being able to use call lights for assistance in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (occurs when your brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy during personal care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for privacy, in that: CNA E and CNA J did not maintain privacy while providing incontinent care for Resident #3. This failure could place residents who require assistance with incontinent care at risk of being exposed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (occurs when your brain loses oxygen and could cause serious, permanent brain damage), schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness involving symptoms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, depression, and high-energy mood), bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by alternating periods of elation and depression), and depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of records, in that: The facility failed to ensure the treatment administration records (TAR) for Resident #1 accurately reflected the administration of the bilateral wound treatment on 01/03/2025 and 01/07/2025. This deficient practice could place residents receiving treatments at risk for not receiving appropriate care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), type 2 diabetes (a condition that occurs when the body does not regulate or use sugar properly), bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-29 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's legal guardian was sufficiently prepared and oriented for Resident #1's transfer to hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without preparation, causing a disruption in their care and services and denying them a voice regarding their treatment plan. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 06/29/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills), schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness that causes a person to experience dramatic changes in their thoughts, moods, and behaviors). Record review of Resident #1's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 2 of 3 the residents (Residents #4 and #56) reviewed for oxygen in that: The facility faield to ensure Residents #4 and #56 did not have an empty oxygen humidifier bottle on the oxygen concentrator dated 5/12/24 while in use. This deficient practice could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for an increase in respiratory complications. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 6/10/24, revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included: Acute Kidney Failure (when your kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), Respiratory Failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), and Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to repair a broken electrical outlet in a Resident's room, fix a roof leak in a resident's room, repair a section of broken floor paneling in a resident hallway corridor, replace a damaged section of ceiling tile in a resident hallway corridor. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not living in a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The findings included: During an observation on 06/10/24 from 10:10 a.m. to 10:55 a.m. revealed the following: 1. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken electrical outlet that showed an open electrical connection without an outlet cover. 2. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a roof leaf that involved a 3x3 section of roof panels with an active leak occurring which created a puddle of water on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observations, Interview and record review , the facility failed to residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #46 and #55) reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Residents #46's and #55's call lights were within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #46's face sheet dated 6/11/24 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included: Schizoaffective disorder (is a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of hallucinations and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Unsteady on feet (pattern of walking that is unsteady). Record review of Resident #46 Quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to reside in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 residents (Residents #14 and #33), in that: 1. Barrels of soiled linens and trash were stored in the shower area of Resident #14's restroom. 2. Resident #33's shower chair and the floor of the shower area in her restroom were soiled with a dark brown substance which appeared to be mud or feces. These deficient practices could lead to diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings were: 1. Observation of Resident #14's restroom on 06/10/2024 at 1:00 p.m., revealed the presence of two wheeled barrels, one with soiled linen and the other with trash. During an interview with the Director of Housekeeping on 06/10/2024 at 1:04 p.m., the Director of Housekeeping confirmed the presence of two wheeled barrels, one with soiled linen and the other with trash in Resident #14's restroom and stated, I keep telling them not to do that. 2. Observation of Resident #33's restroom on 06/10/2024 at 1:12 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1of 6 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 did not have access to an electronic cigarette. This failure could place residents at risk of injury or harm, as well as contribute to avoidable accidents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, dated 6/11/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included Muscle weakness (a decrease in muscle strength and the ability to move your body), Insomnia (a sleep disorder in which you have trouble falling and/or staying asleep) and Type II Diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, is too high). Record review of Resident #55 Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was not given a psychotropic drug unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for unnecessary medications, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 was prescribed a psychotropic drug for anxiety no longer than 14 days PRN . This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 6/11/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included: Congestive heart failure (is a long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), Chronic Pain Syndrome (long-standing pain that persists beyond the usual recovery period), and Muscle Weakness (a decrease in muscle strength or a reduced ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 (refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B) of 3 residents' reviewed in that: The facilty failed to ensure the personal refrigerators in one residents' rooms contained food items which were unlabeled and undated. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming spoiled foods. The findings were: Observation on 06/11/24 at 9:02 a.m. revealed the personal refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] B contained open lunch meat undated. Further observation on 06/11/2024 at 10:36 a.m. revealed a container with lunch meat undated . During an interview with CNA A on 06/11/2024 at 10:45 a.m., CNA A confirmed that the personal refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B contained an open package of lunch meat which was unlabeled and undated. During an interview with the DON and ADON on 06/11/2024 at 1:47 p.m., the DON and ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with adequate foot care and access to podiatry services. This failure could place residents at risk of discomfort, poor foot hygiene, or a decline in residents' physical condition. The findings were: Record review of the admission Record, printed 6/04/2024, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted on [DATE]. Record review of the quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS summary score of 4, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1's primary medical condition category that best described the primary reason for admission was coded as medically complex conditions related to a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Other active diagnoses included Huntington's Disease. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to monitor based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who use psychotropic drugs for the efficacy and adverse consequences of prescribed psychotropic medications for 6 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) of 12 residents reviewed for medication management. - The facility failed to monitor Resident #1 for side effects and observe for the behaviors of the antidepressant medication Sertraline HCl and the antianxiety medication Hydroxyzine HCl. - The facility failed to monitor Resident #2 for side effects and observe for the behaviors of the antianxiety medication Ativan, the antidepressant medication Citalopram, and the anticonvulsant medication Trileptal. - The facility failed to monitor Resident #3 for side effects and observe for the behaviors of the antidepressant medication Mirtazapine. - The facility failed to monitor Resident #4 for side effects and observe for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an incident in which Resident #1 attempted suicide. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 05/24/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), depression, and anxiety (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness) disorder. Resident #1 was noted as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 13 residents reviewed. The facility did not have evidence that a thorough investigation was completed for Resident #1 who had attempted suicide. This failure could place residents at risk of incidents not being thoroughly investigated. The findings included: Record review of Resident'#1's admission Record, dated 05/24/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), depression, and anxiety (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness) disorder. Resident #1 was noted as discharged on 05/02/2024 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #1's State Optional MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 8, which indicated the resident was mildly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 44% based on 11 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 1 (Resident #7) of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors. CMA H failed to administer medication as ordered to Resident #7 by administering Amlodipine (a treatment for high blood pressure), Buspirone HCl (a treatment for mood disorder), Calcium-Vitamin D supplement, Clonidine (a treatment for high blood pressure), Docusate Sodium (a treatment for constipation), Divalproex Sodium (a treatment for mood disorder), Furosemide (a treatment for edema or fluid retention), Metoprolol Tartrate (a treatment for high blood pressure), Multivitamin, Sodium Supplement, Spironolactone (a treatment for edema or fluid retention) over 1½ hours after the scheduled time. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #3, #1) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. During wound care of Resident #3, LVN D made several passes in multiple directions with the same gauze to clean the wound; she made several passes in multiple directions to dry the wound, and when applying the ointment to the wound, she made several passes with the tongue depressor with ointment on it without discarding the used tongue depressor and using a new one with each new pass. 2. During incontinent care for Resident #2, CNA C washed her hands before starting care and dried her hands with one soaked paper towel for both hands; after washing her hands, she closed the privacy curtain; she donned gloves without using hand sanitizer. CNA F washed his hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for infection control. CNA A did not change her gloves or sanitize her hands when she finished cleaning Resident #1's feces from his anus and placed a clean brief onto him This deficient practice could place residents at risk of developing a urinary tract infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 09/07/2023 revealed a male resident who was admitted to the facility initially on 12/10/2022 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels to the brain), pressure ulcer to right heel, stage 3 (affects the top two layers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform a resident's physician when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility did not notify Resident #1's physician (Physician F) prior to Resident #1's discharge on [DATE]. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician notified of discharge resulting in a delay in continuity of care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/17/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy [a chemical imbalance in the blood that causes problems in the brain], thrombocytopenia [a low amount of platelets, which are blood cells that cause clotting, in the blood], unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, muscle weakness (generalized), and dysphagia [difficulty swallowing], oral phase. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were permitted to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility and the facility also did not provide written records when a resident was discharged for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to have a valid circumstance to support discharging Resident #1 to the local homeless shelter on 8/15/23. The facility did not provide written records to the local homeless shelter upon discharging Resident #1. This failure could result in residents being discharged without appropriate reasons and documentation communicated to help with the transition of care and could place a medically compromised resident at risk of a decline due to changing clinical environments and care continuity. The findings were: Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, before the facility transferred or discharged a resident, the facility failed to notify the local Ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and failed to issue a notice of discharge to 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge rights in that: The facility did not issue a discharge notice to Resident #1 at least 30 days prior to his discharge to the local homeless shelter on 8/15/23. The facility did not send a copy of the discharge notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This failure could place the residents at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options and appeal process, and being discharged without alternate placement. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/17/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy [a chemical imbalance in the blood that causes problems in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a discharge summary that included a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a discharge summary, medication reconciliation, information on Resident #1's permanent medical necessity (PMN) status, and a post-discharge plan of care at the time of his discharge to the local homeless shelter on 8/15/23. This deficient practice could place discharged residents at risk for a lack of continued care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/17/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy [a chemical imbalance in the blood that causes problems in the brain], thrombocytopenia [a low amount of platelets, which are blood cells that cause clotting, in the blood], unspecified, essential (primary)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 staff (Housekeeper D and Receptionist B) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. Receptionist B was sitting at the entrance desk wearing a facemask inappropriately leaving nose uncovered. 2. Housekeeper D was observed wearing a facemask inappropriately down around her neck. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of illness from communicable diseases. The findings were: 1. During an observation on 08/01/2023 at 9:55 a.m. revealed, Receptionist B in the receptionist's desk Further observation revealed Receptionist B's facemask was not covering her nose. During an interview with Receptionist B on 08/01/2023 at the same time, Receptionist B confirmed she knew she was supposed to always have her facemask on. Receptionist B stated, I sometimes let my face mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure frozen foods were properly labeled and dated. 3. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were not in the pantry, refrigerator, and freezer. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: Observations on 04/12/2023 at 9:40 AM until 10:25 AM revealed 1. A partially used 5 lb. bag of salad mix of red cabbage, romaine lettuce, and shredded carrots in clear plastic manufactures bag with plastic tied at the top to seal the package located in refrigerator 1. The white label on the outside of bag revealed, R 4/10/23, the only date on the package. There was not a use by date on the package the product was wet with moisture and the color of the lettuce was changing darker. 2. Three unopened clear plastic 5 lb.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for one of two ovens (oven #1 and oven #2) reviewed in the facility's only kitchen for essential equipment 1. The facility failed to ensure oven #2 was maintained, and the griddle grease can was properly cleaned in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. 2. The facility failed to ensure that one of the two ovens in the kitchen could be safely operated after the griddle grease can was welded to the oven and can't be removed. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their food send out timely. The findings include: Observation on 04/12/2023 at 9:40 AM revealed a Vulcan brand oven. The oven was one unit with two ovens side by side. The larger unit on the right had a griddle on the top and a grease can that caught grease below the griddle. The grease can was extended approximately 4 -6 inches from the front of the larger oven on the right that had the griddle on top. The grease can was frozen, it could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-14 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — patternHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care for three of eight residents (Residents #8, #54 and #48) reviewed for quality of life. 1. The facility failed to ensure the environment in and around Residents #8 and #54's room was free of unpleasant odors. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was able to spend time outside per his preferences and care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life, indignity, and depression. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #8's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis (bacterial skin infection), cerebral ischemia (brain injury from impaired blood flow) memory deficits,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #6, 8, 9, 14, and 27) reviewed for ADLS. The facility failed to ensure Residents #6, #8, #9, #14, and #27's fingernails were trimmed, smooth, and clean. This failure could place residents at risk of scratches, infection, and indignity. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis (infection of the deeper layers of skin most commonly caused by bacteria that normally live on the skins surface), cerebral ischemia (impaired blood flow to the brain) memory deficits, need for assistance with personal care, type two diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality of records. The facility failed to protect the personal healthcare information of Resident #58 which was visible on a computer screen in the hallway while MA D went into his room to administer medications. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. Findings included: Record review of the Resident #58's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes without complications (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, symptoms and signs involving cognitive (relating to conscious mental activities) functions and awareness, Chronic Kidney Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #8) reviewed for incontinence care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's urinary catheter bag was emptied and not backing up into the catheter tubing. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received timely incontinent care, which led to a strong foul odor about her person. This failure could place residents at risk of urinary tract infections. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #10's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Congenital and Developmental Myasthenia (inherited disorder that usually develops at or near birth and involves muscle weakness and fatigue), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of two medication carts (2nd floor cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the Medication Aide cart for the 2nd floor was locked and supervised. This failure could place residents at risk of ingesting unprescribed and/or expired medications resulting in adverse health consequences. Findings included: Observation on 04/13/2023 at 7:16 AM revealed MA D left the medication cart unlocked while she administered medications to Resident #58. Interview on 04/13/2023 at 7:35 AM, MA D stated she had been a Medication Aide for 9 years but had worked at the facility for 1 ½ months. She stated she should not have left the medication cart unlocked and unattended as it was a safety issue and someone could come along and get into it, ingest the medications, and make them sick, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-07-31 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed in 1 of 2 garbage dumpsters to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The facility failed to ensure the sliding doors on both sides of the dumpster were completely closed. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents.The findings were: Observation on 07/29/25 at 10:30am with the Food Service Director revealed the sliding door which measured approximately 4x4 ft on one of the two standing garbage bins was open. The garbage bin with the open sliding door was full of garbage bags. During an interview on 7/29/25 at 10:35am with the Food Service Director stated that she was aware that the garbage lid should have been closed for pest control prevention. During an interview on 07/29/25 at 11:25am with the Administrator stated he was not aware of the reason for the requirement to keep the garbage lids closed. The Administrator stated he agreed keeping the garbage lids closed would maintain pest control. Record review of facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-06-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the garbage storage area in a manner to prevent the harborage of pests for 1 of 1 facility. The facility failed to close a garbage bin lid on a separate garbage disposal unit on two separate occasions. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not living in a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Findings included: An observation with the Dietary Director on 06/11/24 at 11:15a.m, revealed that one of the two garbage bins used by the facility had a side-lid covering which measured 35x23 inches which was left open exposing bags of garbage. An observation with the Dietary Director on 6/12/24 at 11:00a.m., revealed that one of the two garbage bins used by the facility had a side-lid covering which was left open exposing bags of garbage. During an interview with the Dietary Director on 06/12/24 at 11:00a.m., she stated that she was aware that the garbage bin lids had to stay closed at all times to prevent problems with pests. During an interview with the Administrator on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-04-14 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms for 8 of 59 resident rooms (Rooms 8, 9, 10, 33, 40, 41, 42 and 43) reviewed for square footage. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms 8, 9, 10, 33, 40, 41, 42, and 43 were the required 80 square feet per resident. This failure could place residents at-risk for problems in residents' activities of daily living and could compromise resident's privacy. The findings include: Observation on 04/12/23 at 10:00AM revealed room measurements for the following rooms: - room [ROOM NUMBER] - 20.778 x 11.25 = 77.915 (approximately 77.915 square feet for each resident). - room [ROOM NUMBER] - 20.789 x 11.265 feet = 234.175 (approximately 76.61 square feet for each resident). - room [ROOM NUMBER] - 15.072 x 15.831 = 238.606 (approximately 79.535 square feet for each resident). - room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,268 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $17,268 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATIQUE, RASHID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/12/2024 |
| MEYER, ALYSSIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| APOLINAR, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/23/2015 |
| CONTRERAS, TERRI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2019 |
| TOBIN HILL NURSING AND REHAB CENTER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/26/2025 |
| LARSEN, KEVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/29/2024 |
| BEWSEY, MICHAEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/26/2025 |
| SMV SAN ANTONIO NORTH LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455817. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.