No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pleasanton North Nursing And Rehabilitation

404 W. Goodwin St, Pleasanton, TX 78064 · For profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (830) 569-2138 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0604, F0607) — most recent Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$167,869 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604, F0607) — most recent Jun 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $167,869 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
310 W Oaklawn Rd · (830) 569-2388 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
105 N Smith St · (830) 569-2512 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
H-E-B0.2 mi
219 W Oaklawn Rd · (830) 281-8172 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 River Park Rd · (830) 569-3867 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.0%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.8%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.5%9.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.992.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.852.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.69U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
42.3%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.68 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.85 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-18)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #5) reviewed for abuse, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse when RN A and NA H restrained the resident using a gait belt wrapped around the resident's abdomen from 10/08/2023 to 3/01/2024 and secured to his wheelchair behind the resident to prevent the resident from standing, used furniture to prevent movement by Resident #1 in his wheelchair and emotional abuse from RN A. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #1 and #5 were free from verbal abuse when RN A used derogatory language and profanity directed at the residents. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 4/18/2024 at 5:27 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4/18/2024 at 5:31 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 4/21/2024 the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-04-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purpose of discipline or convenience and that are required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 8 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for restraint, in that; The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was free from restraint when RN A and NA H tied Resident #1 to a wheelchair with a gait belt wrapped around his abdomen and secured behind the resident out of reach and by using furniture to block his movement while in the wheelchair on multiple occasions from 10/082023-03/01/2024. This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 4/18/2023 at 5:27 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4/18/2024 at 5:31 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 4/21/2024 the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential harm with a scope identified as pattern until interventions were put in place to ensure staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for restraint and abuse, in that; The facility failed to develop and implement and abuse policy that clearly defines restraint as abuse and ensure staff had the knowledge of how and where to report allegations of restraint and abuse. This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 4/18/2023 at 5:27 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4/18/2024 at 5:31 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 4/21/2024 the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential harm with a scope identified as isolated until interventions were put in place to ensure staff members were in compliance with identifying and reporting abuse. This failure could place all residents at risk for potential abuse due to restraint due to unreported restraint and abuse and result in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA A was suspended pending an allegation of abuse or neglect when Resident #11 became combative with care. CNA A did not discontinue care or call for help when Resident #11 became combative. Resident #11 sustained skin tears to his hands, bruising to hands, skin tears to his forearms, and a left-hand fracture. On 6/5/24 at 7:15 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 6/7/24 at 09:15 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy and a scope of Isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. This failure could place residents at risk of continued victimization,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation for of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect and abuse, in that; The facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedures when Resident #11 obtained skin tears, brusising to hands, skin tears to his forearms, and a left-hand fracture after peri-care with CNA A. On 6/5/24 at 7:15 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed prior to exit on 6/7/24, While the IJ was removed on 6/7/24 at 09:15 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy and a scope of Isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. This failure could place residents at risk of continued victimization, abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for assessments: Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] did not indicate she had a fall since her last MDS assessment. These failures could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/24/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances (cognitive decline), unsteadiness on feet and other abnormalities of the gait and mobility (impaired patterns of walking and movement that deviate from normal coordination, balance or rhythm). Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 0 out of 15 indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS under Section J - Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 residents (Resident #1 and #2) of 10 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #1's fall prevention interventions, including low bed, anti-skid socks (socks with rubber on soles to stop slipping), and anti-skid tape on the floor (tape with a gritty type substance to reduce slipping), but did reflect hipsters (which she did not wear) in her comprehensive person-centered care plan. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #2's fall prevention interventions, including low bed, anti-skid socks, anti-tip devices on wheelchair, and anti-skid tape on the floor in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans.Facility staff failed to follow the fall interventions in Resident #1's care plan that included keeping Resident #1's bed in the lowest position. Resident #1's was observed lying in bed and the bed was not at the lowest position on 11/06/2025. This deficient practice could place residents with the potential for falls at risk for injury to themselves or others. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (a general term for impaired ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #14) of 8 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #14 was referred to as a feeder in the assisted dining room. This deficient practice could cause psychosocial harm due to feelings of embarrassment and loss of dignity. The findings were: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 07/16/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: altered mental status, dysphagia oral phase (difficulty swallowing), and unspecified dementia (difficulty with memory). Record review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/21/2025, revealed a BIMS score of 00 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #14 required assistance to complete activities of daily living, including eating. Record review of Resident #14's care plan, edited 06/09/2025, revealed, [Resident #14] is at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observations, Interviews, and Record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #12 & Resident # 31) reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 and # 31's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident # 12's face sheet dated 7/15/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 12 had a diagnosis that included: Hemiparesis on the left side (refers to weakness on the left side of the body), anxiety disorder (group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread) and Muscle weakness (refers to a reduced ability of one or more muscles to generate force). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for accuracy of records as evidenced by: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's MDS assessment accurately recorded the number of days that insulin injections were received during the last 7 days prior to the assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of missing treatments or medications leading to a decline in health or overall well-being.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for accuracy of records as evidenced by: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's MDS assessment accurately recorded the number of days that insulin injections were received during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program for residents with newly evident or possible severe mental illness for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #15) reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to identify Resident #4 and Resident #15 as having diagnoses of mental illness including Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) on the PASRR Level I screening which would require a PASRR Level II assessment. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life related to not receiving or benefiting from specialized PASRR services.The findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet for Resident #4, dated 7/15/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest in activities) , Diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards and provide assistive devices to each president to prevent avoidable accidents 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12), reviewed for accidents and hazards: The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had fall mats in place These failures could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 12's face sheet dated 7/15/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 12 had a diagnosis that included: Hemiparesis on the left side (refers to weakness on the left side of the body), anxiety disorder (group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread) and Muscle weakness (refers to a reduced ability of one or more muscles to generate force). Record review of Resident # 12's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 9, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system of record of the disposition of all controlled drugs to enable accurate reconciliation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's medication reconciliation log for the Schedule II medication (substances with a high potential for abuse, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence) Norco 5/325 accurately reflected the number of doses administered.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications, experiencing untreated pain, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included:Record review of Resident #31's admission sheet dated 11/28/24 documented a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), recurrent depressive disorders, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of two medication carts (nurse medication cart) and one of one medication rooms observed for drug storage and labeling, as evidenced by:1. The facility failed to ensure the medication room contained no unexpired supplies.2. The facility failed to ensure all insulin pens located inside the nurse medication cart were properly labeled with opened dates.These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate treatments or false results. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of two medication carts (nurse medication cart) and one of one medication rooms observed for drug storage and labeling, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plan revision/timing. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's care plan was revised in a timely manner to reflect falls on (4) occasions. This deficient practice could affect residents' care/services and may cause a delay in treatment and/or decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 5/30/25, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: Unsteadiness on Feet and Dementia (General term for memory loss,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources are reported not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Abuse, in that: The facility did not report an allegation of Abuse to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) within 24 hours of Resident #1 falling off the bed. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to further neglect. The findings were: Review of Resident's # 1 face sheet dated 4/16/ 2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: schizoaffective disorder ( mental disorder that changes how people think, feel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility; the safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident; and the health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered for 1 of 3 (Resident #4) reviewed for discharge. Resident #4 was transferred to the hospital for a psychological evaluation on 3/25/2025 and was not allowed to return to the facility. The facility failed to document the bases of Resident #4's discharge. This could affect all residents and could result in residents not having the opportunity to appeal the discharge from the facility. The Finding were: Record review of Resident #4's admission record dated 4/15/2025 was documented he was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights and includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 10 ( Resident #3) residents in that: Resident #3's care plan for his pacemaker was not complete with name, serial number and when he last seen the cardiac physician. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving necessary services and care. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 4/15/2025 indicated an admission date of 10/18/24 and readmission date of 3/25/2025. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of cardiac pacemaker. Record review of Resident #3's significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15/15 (cognitively intact) and had a cardiac pacemaker. Record review of Resident #3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 (Resident #3) resident in that: Resident #3's care plan for his pacemaker was not his last cardiac physician appointment. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment and/or a decline in their health. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 4/15/2025 with admission date of 10/18/24 and readmission date of 3/25/2025. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of cardiac pacemaker. Record review of Resident #3's consolidated physicians orders for April 2024 was documented in his diagnosis was a pacemaker, but not as an order for cardiac pacemaker serial # and how to care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 12 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medication errors was free of any significant medication errors. The facility failed to administer medication (Glargine, a drug to lower blood sugar) as prescribed for Resident #2. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased adverse side effects, and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of admission face sheet, dated 4/16/2005, revealed Resident # 2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included vascular dementia ( occurs when there is damage to regions in the brain, affecting memory ), Type two diabetes ( condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel), and major depressive disorder ( persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/3/2025, revealed Resident # 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. Meat products were stored above other food items in the facility kitchen freezer. These deficient practices could place 34 residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings were: During an observation of the facility kitchen, on 04/03/2025 at 9:45 a.m., the freezer was observed to have the following items, slabbed bacon 18/2 count box, 2-2 lb bags of diced turkey, 2-3 lb honey hams, 10 lb box of chicken, 50 portion box of beef fritters, 10 lb box of chicken sausage, stored above a box of 300 count bread rolls, a box of cookie dough, package of sweet potato fries, and a box of individual size pizzas. During an interview with the Dietary Manager, on 04/03/2025 at 10:00 a.m., the Dietary Manager stated she was responsible for storing the food in the freezer and ensuring the food was stored safely. The Dietary Manager stated meat should be stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for environment. Resident #4's footrest on the electric bed was in an elevated position and reported to Maintenance on 03/29/2025. Resident #4's bed was not repaired until 04/03/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being uncomfortable and at risk of injury from equipment that was not functioning properly. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of fat in the artery walls), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower leg (high blood pressure in the legs), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. Resident #4 had a physician's order and care plan for hospice services on his medical record after he was discharged from hospice services. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of fat in the artery walls), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower leg (high blood pressure in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for infection control. Resident #4 had an order for enhanced barrier precautions related to a wound and did not have a sign on his door identifying a need for enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #4. This deficient practice could affect residents on enhanced barrier precautions and place them at risk for infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of fat in the artery walls), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan was revised to reflect a fall sustained on 7/19/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's care plan was revised to reflect falls sustained on 8/17/24 and 8/18/24. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan was revised to reflect a fall sustained on 8/30/24. These failures could place residents at risk of current needs not being met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 9/16/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensue that staff conducted (4 of 14 neuro checks done) neurological assessments for 72 hours per facility protocol after an unwitnessed fall with laceration to above right eye on 08/18/2024 for Resident #3. These failures could result with residents not receiving the necessary interventions in a timely manner, by not recognizing a change of condition that could result in a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 9/16/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) , hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's neurological assessments were accurately documented in the resident's record following a fall on 8/30/24. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated 9/16/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's Disease (disease affecting memory and other important mental functions) , Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) , Type 2 diabetes (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) , Major Depressive Disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safely for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. Failed to ensure food was not expired in dry storage. 2. Failed to ensure food was maintained at freezing temperatures in the freezer. 3. Failed to ensure that the icemaker was sufficiently cleaned. 4. Failed to ensure all food storage items were labeled and dated. 5. Failed to ensure dry grains storage bins remained closed when not in use. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: Observation on 06/02/2024 at 10:15 AM revealed the following: 1 unit of Hershey's cocoa mix dated best by 2023. Freezer internal temperature gauge of 52 degrees with boxes of unfrozen, thawed food. 2 open bins containing rice and white flour in the dry storage area of the kitchen. Interview on 06/02/2024 at 10:28 AM, the DM stated she was not aware of the expired Hershey's cocoa mix and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 21 residents (Resident #23, Resident #27, and Resident #39) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's code status was reflected within the care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's code status was reflected within the care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's psychotropic used was reflected within the care plan. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate or incomplete care plan interventions. The findings included: Resident #23 Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 3 of 16 residents (Resident #12, Resident #14, and Resident #20) reviewed for resident rights, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had a documented psychiatric diagnosis for a psychotropic drug, Quetiapine, he was receiving daily. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had orders for no longer than 14 days for lorazepam PRN (as needed). The orders were written for 90 days or no end date. 3. The facility failed to obtain an updated and signed consent for antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine fumarate that was administered to Resident #12. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 had a documented psychiatric diagnosis for a psychotropic drug, Mirtazapine (a medication primarily used to treat depression), he was receiving daily. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 had a documented psychiatric diagnosis for a psychotropic drug,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 9 Residents (Resident #11) whose records were reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that; The facility failed to report to the state reporting agency (HHSC) in a timely manner possible neglect or abuse of Resident #11 when he sustained injuries after care from CNA A. This deficient practice could affect residents by contributing to further abuse and neglect. The findings were: Record Review of Resident #11's admission record revealed an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include neurogenerative disorder with Lewy bodies (It is characterized by the presence of Lewy bodies-abnormal protein deposits-in the brain. These deposits affect brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Screening for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #29). The facility failed to ensure Residents #29 had an accurate PASARR Level 1 Screenings indicating diagnoses of mental illness and refer the residents to the state designated authority. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #29's admission record, dated 6/3/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include anorexia, depression, PTSD, and insomnia. Record Review of Resident #29's care plan, last updated 3/26/24, stated he verbalized or demonstrates sadness at times and had depression, and would get nervous and anxious at times. Resident #29 had a diagnosis of PTSD.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #34 and Resident #11) 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed facility policy while providing wound care to a resident by not dating and initialing the dressing. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C completed treatment orders for Resident #11. LVN C documented she completed wound care orders and did not complete them. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for injury, infection, and harm. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 6/4/24 at 3:39 p.m. LVN C provided wound care to Resident #34. LVN C covered the residents wounds on her feet with a wound dressing and covered the bandage with an ace wrap. LVN C did not date or initial the bandage when she was done. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 3:52 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for oxygen therapy in that: Residents #6 oxygen tubing was dated as 4/15/24 and had not been changed weekly as ordered. These deficient practices could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for an increase in respiratory complications and or infections. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 6's face sheet dated 6/2/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included Chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (is also called heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and other seasonal allergic rhinitis. Record review of Resident # 6's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was severely impaired for daily decision making and indicated she received oxygen therapy. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed facility policy while administering insulin to a resident in a muscle instead of subcutaneous tissue (uses a short needle to inject a medication into the fatty tissue layer between your skin and muscle. Typically, medication delivered this way is absorbed by your body slowly) as ordered for Resident #26. These deficient practices could affect residents who received medication and place them at risk of an adverse reaction or a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's admission record, dated 6/4/24, revealed at [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 1 of 1 medication cart reviewed for labeling and storage, in that: The facility failed to ensure the medication cart was clean, free of unknown debris, loose pills, a dirty pill cutter, a sticky pill [NAME], and a bottle of medication without label with an expiration date. These deficient practices could affect residents prescribed medications in the facility and place them at risk for not receiving the correct medications. The findings were: During an observation on 6/4/24 at 2:19 p.m. revealed the facility's one medication cart had a loose pill in the bottom drawer of the cart, a loose pill in the top left drawer with shreds of paper, foil, other pieces of broken pills, an earring, and other unknown debris. There was a pill [NAME] with white powder on it and an unknown brown sticky substance. The pill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 of 2 staff (LVN C) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN C washed her hands properly prior to wound care on a resident. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infections. The findings included: During an observation on 6/4/24 at 3:48 p.m. LVN C washed her hands in the residents restroom prior to wound care. LVN C turned on the water, washed her hand with soap, rinsed them, and then touched the paper towel dispenser with her bare hand to dispense a paper towel. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 3:59 p.m. LVN C stated she contaminated her hands after she washed them by touching the handle on the paper towel dispenser to get a paper towel. LVN C stated someone told her if she dispensed the paper towel prior to washing her hands she would not be able to use the paper towel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 dishwasher and 1 of 1 vent hood observed for safely functioning equipment. -The chemical dishwasher was not operating at the manufacturer's minimum requirements for rinsing and sanitization. -The vent hood was not inspected and cleaned on the appropriate timeframe. This deficient practice could result in residents not having access to hygienically clean dishes creating a potential for foodborne illness and create a risk of fire exposure in the kitchen. The findings included: Observation and Interview on 06/03/2024 at 10:38 AM revealed a singular over-head kitchen vent hood which contained an inspection sticker that reflected the last service on 02/2024 and the next service on 05/2024. The DM stated the vent hood was inspected by a contracted vendor who was coordinated to visit by the MS. The DM stated she has not had a vent hood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly in the cart for 1 (Licensed Nurse Medication Cart) of 2 medication carts, in that: The facility failed to ensure controlled medications for Resident's #1, #5, #8, and #19 were kept in their original packaging, appropriately labeled and secured with two locks when LVN J pre-dispersed DEA controlled substances which included: 1. One dosage of clonazepam for Resident #1 2. One dosage of Lyrica and one dosage Ativan for Resident #5 3. One dosage of Lyrica for Resident #8 4. Two dosages of liquid morphine for Resident #19. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and drug diversions. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/15/2024 revealed an admission date of 1/21/2021 with readmission date of 4/15/2024 with diagnoses which included: dementia moderate with behavioral disturbance, unsteadiness on feet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority the resident representative when there was a change in condition status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for restraint and abuse, in that:. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician and RP were notified when it was discovered on 3/01/2024 Resident #1 had been restrained by facility staff including RN A. This failure could place all residents at risk of a delay in medical treatment and could result in not receiving appropriate care and interventions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/15/2024 revealed an admission date of 1/21/2021 with readmission date of 4/15/2024 with diagnoses which included: dementia moderate with behavioral disturbance, unsteadiness on feet and generalized muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for ADL care, in that; The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was provided incontinent care when he pressed the call light and requested assistance from NA H. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 4/15/2024 revealed an admission date of 6/02/2023 with diagnoses which included: progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia [Steele-[NAME]-[NAME] disease} (a rare disease that gradually destroys nerve cells in the parts of the brain that control eye movements, breathing, and muscle coordination) depression, and aphasia (the loss of ability to use and comprehend language). Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 Nurses' Aides (NA H) were not working in the facility longer than four months without having completed a competency evaluation program. The facility failed to ensure NA H was certified within four months of hire as full-time staff. This deficient practice place residents at risk for receiving care from an individual whose skill level was unproven. The findings included: Record review of the facility staff roster (undated) provided upon entrance revealed NA H was listed as a Nursing Assistant with a hire date of 10/11/2022. Record review of employee personnel files revealed NA H had a completed and notarized LTCR Form 3767 dated 6/01/2023 which indicated the DON (former ADON) was the instructor and had provided training from 11/01/2022 through 12/31/2022 to NA H. The personnel file indicated NA H was still listed as non-certified. During an observation/interview on 4/15/2024 at 10:15 p.m., NA H was observed working in the facility during evening/night shift providing resident care. NA H stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 2 of 4 Residents (Resident #14 and Resident #35) and 1 of 2 staff (LVN A) reviewed for medication administration in that: 1. Resident #14's liquid lorazepam (A medication used to decreased anxiety) narcotic log was inaccurate. The bottle of liquid lorazepam was stored in the medication storage room and did not have a pharmacy label on the bottle. 2. LVN A administered regular insulin to Resident #35 without priming the insulin pen (removing air bubbles from the needle) prior to administering. These deficient practices could affect residents who received medication and place them at risk of not receiving the appropriate amount of medication and could result in an adverse reaction or a decline in health. The findings were: 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for care plans in that: Resident #22's comprehensive person-centered care plan did not reflect their bowel or bladder incontinence. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet, dated 4/17/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease, unspecified (A circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs.) Record review of Resident #22's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/8/23 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1) and 1 of 4 staff (LVN A) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. LVN A used her barehand to turn off the sink faucet after washing her hands prior to wound care for Resident #1 and again after wound care. These deficient practices could place residents who receive wound care at-risk for infections. The findings included: During an observation on 04/17/23 at 2:18 p.m. LVN A prepared wound care supplies to treat Resident #1's stage III pressure ulcer wound (bedsores or wound that affects the top two layers of skin, as well as fatty tissue) on her back. LVN A went to wash her hands in the Residents bathroom. LVN A turned on the water, wet her hands, dispensed soap, and lathered her hands. LVN A then rinsed her hands off, turned the sink off with her barehand, grabbed paper towels, dried hers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-07 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 20 of 46 resident rooms as required for (Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #11, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, and #25) reviewed for the 80 square feet per resident requirement. The facility failed to ensure all resident rooms met the minimum size requirements. This deficient practice could affect residents who may reside in these rooms and not allow sufficient room to carry out activities of daily living care, or have the room furnished as they would like and place them at risk for decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of HHSC Form-3740, dated 06/02/2024, reflected rooms #1-23 and #25 were indicated as Title 18/19 beds with a total facility occupancy of 46 beds. Record review of HHSC Form-3763, dated 06/05/2024, reflected rooms #1-23 and #25 as rooms that did not meet the justification criteria on the basis that they did not meet the 72 square feet per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-04-20 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the facility's Binding Arbitration Agreement provided for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties for three of three residents (Residents #1, #14, & #22) reviewed for facility compliance with requirements for binding arbitration agreements. The facility failed to ensure that it's Arbitration Agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties for Residents #1, #14, and #22. These failures put residents and their representatives at risk of being uninformed about their rights regarding binding arbitration and less able to defend their rights related to disputes, controversy or claims arising out of or related to the services to be performed by the nursing facility. The findings included: During the entrance conference on 4/17/23 at 10:13 AM with the ADON, a blank copy of the facility's admission packet and of the facility's binding arbitration agreement were requested and these were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$167,869 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $65,000 — penalty dated 2024-06-07
  • $102,869 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-09 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bear Creek Nursing And RehabilitationGrapevine, TX 1 of 5Cooney Healthcare And RehabilitationHelena, MT 1 of 5Deer Creek Nursing and RehabilitationWimberley, TX 1 of 5Ennis Care CenterEnnis, TX 1 of 5Greenview Nursing and RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Lakeshore Village Nursing And RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Memorial Medical Nursing And RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Richardson Nursing and RehabilitationRichardson, TX 1 of 5Rolling Hills HealthcareBelle Fourche, SD 1 of 5San Antonio North Nursing and RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Skyline Heights Nursing And RehabilitationBillings, MT 1 of 5The Meadows On UniversityFargo, ND 1 of 5The Suites PasadenaPasadena, TX 1 of 5Yellowstone River Nursing And RehabilitationBillings, MT 2 of 5Elkhorn Healthcare And RehabilitationClancy, MT 2 of 5Jourdanton Nursing and RehabilitationJourdanton, TX 2 of 5Keystone Post-AcuteFresno, CA 2 of 5Parkview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLockhart, TX 2 of 5Spearfish Canyon HealthcareSpearfish, SD 2 of 5The Suites Rio VistaRio Rancho, NM 3 of 5Cypress Woods Care CenterAngleton, TX 3 of 5Eastern Montana Veterans HomeGlendive, MT 3 of 5Silver Creek Nursing And RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 4 of 5Copper Ridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterButte, MT 4 of 5Hacienda Oaks At BeevilleBeeville, TX 4 of 5Heritage Trails Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCleburne, TX 4 of 5Pleasanton South Nursing and RehabilitationPleasanton, TX 4 of 5Prairie Heights HealthcareAberdeen, SD 5 of 5Bangs Nursing And RehabilitationBangs, TX 5 of 5Golden Years Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterMarlin, TX 5 of 5Highland Care CenterHolladay, UT 5 of 5Hurst Plaza Nursing and RehabHurst, TX 5 of 5Southwest Montana Veterans HomeButte, MT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MAVERICK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2023
MARTINEZ, ALMAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2023
PLEASANTON NURSING AND REHAB CENTER, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2023
BEWSEY, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2023

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 5%Other / private 30%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$251per resident / day
operating cost
$7,633per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$237per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675502. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next