No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Richardson Nursing and Rehabilitation

1111 Rockingham Drive, Richardson, TX 75080 · For profit - Individual · 280 certified beds · (972) 231-8833 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0567)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$8,977 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,977 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
670 W Arapaho, Suite 6 Richardson · (972) 235-6311 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1112 N Floyd Rd · (214) 501-4615 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
525 W Arapaho Rd · (214) 954-6371 · Call to confirm hours
Park
525 Malden Dr · (972) 235-8344 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
575 W Arapaho Rd · (972) 926-9322

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.9%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.9%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%9.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.1%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.242.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.852.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.72U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.5%CMS range 26.0–60.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.0–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 280 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 186 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.60 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.74 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Residents #1) of four residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans. The facility failed to devise and implement any Comprehensive Care Plan goals and/or interventions for Resident #1's documented wandering, exit seeking, and/or elopement behavior on 07/16/2024 to prevent an incident of elopement by Resident #1 on 08/27/2024. Additionally, Resident #1 had a documented history of physical aggression on 07/16/2024 at 9:20 PM that necessitated the relocation of his roommate but was not updated on his Comprehensive Care Plan. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator on 08/28/2024 at 4:10 PM. While the POR was accepted on 08/29/2024 at 12:04 PM and the IJ lifted at 08/29/2024 at 3:45 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and/or hazards for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for elopement behavior. Resident #1 had a documented history of wandering and/or exit seeking behavior on 07/16/2024. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #1 who had a history of exit seeking behavior. The facility did not accurately re-assess his elopment risk assessment, monitor, or update the residents care plan after the incident. On 08/27/2024 around approximately 6:00 AM the resident was located by the facility's SLP outside the facility beyond the Therapy Services door. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator on 08/28/2024 at 4:10 PM. While the POR was accepted on 08/29/2024 at 12:04 PM and the IJ lifted at 08/29/2024 at 3:45 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of potential for minimum harm and scope of isolated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure receiving services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 4 of 9 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4 and #5) reviewed for the resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #3's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #4's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #5's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 8 residents (Resident s#5 and #6) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's nasal cannula connected to the oxygen concentrator (medical device that extracts oxygen from room air by filtering out or separating the nitrogen from the oxygen) was properly stored. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's nasal cannula connected to the oxygen concentrator was properly stored. These failures could place the residents at risk of respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated 04/23/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included Chronic Obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #1 and #7) reviewed for dignity. Resident #1 was observed lying in bed and his catheter bag could be observed hanging from his bed without a privacy cover. Resident #7 was observed sitting on his bed and his catheter bag could be observed laying on the floor without a privacy cover. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not feeling as if they were being treated with dignity, privacy, and respect.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 04/23/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis included Neuromuscular Dysfubction of Bladder (a condition where the nerves that carry messages between the brain and the bladder are damaged, causing a loss of bladder control) . Record review of Resident #1's active physician's order as of revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 8 (Residents #8) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #8 did not have zinc oxide in his room. The failure could place residents at risk of accidental overdose, misuse of medications, and possible adverse reactions. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's Face Sheet, dated 04/23/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE]. The resident has diagnosed that included Allergic Rhinitis commonly known as hay fever or allergies, is a reaction that causes sneezing, a runny or stuffed-up nose, and itchy eyes or throat), and Hypertension (high blood pressure) Record review of Resident #8's physician's order, dated 02/20/2026, revealed an order for: Zinc Oxide External…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have complete and accurately documented medical records for one of eight Resident (Resident #9) whose clinical record was reviewed for accuracy. The facility failed to record on the TAR wound care provided to the resident on 04/17/26, 04/18/26, 04/19/26, 04/20/26, and 04/21/26. This failure could affect all residents at risk for inaccurate or incomplete clinical records and place residents at risk for her wound care not being done as ordered.Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's Face Sheet, dated 04/23/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. The resident has diagnosed that included Diabetes ((high blood sugar levels) and Peripheral vascular disease (a slow, progressive circulation disorder that occurs when blood vessels outside of the heart and brain become narrowed, blocked, or spasm). Record review of Resident #9's physician's order, dated 04/21/2026, revealed an order for: Povidone-Iodine Solution 10 % Apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of eight (resident #7) residing on two of four halls (Hall 100 and 200) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure personal items were not stored on the medication carts located on hall 100 The facility failed to ensure that CNA M had on PPE when providing high contact care for Resident #7. This failure could place the residents at risk of an infection during medication administration and care. Findings included: During an interview and observation on 04/23/26 at 9:20 a.m., MA B was observed with a personal phone, 2 portable fans and deodorant spray on top of the medication cart on 100 hall. She stated the phone was her personal phone for her to see who was calling. She stated the fans were to keep her cool as she passes medications and that the deodorant spray was for when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with the Hospice agency, specific to each patient, for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for hospice services. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] after her g-tube was dislodged and needed to be replaced. The facility failed to report this hospital transfer to the hospice agency. This failure could affect residents who received Hospice services by placing them at risk for services and treatments not being coordinated. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 12/13/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1 did not have a BIMS score calculated, but was noted to have short and long-term memory problems along with severely impaired cognitive skills. Resident #1's active diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior), aphasia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for five of eighteen residents (Residents #3, #5, #61, #73, and #79) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA G secured Residents #3, #61, #73, and #79's medical information before leaving her cart on 03/11/2026. 2. The facility failed to provide privacy during Resident #5's transfer via mechanical lift on 03/10/2026.These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy maintained while treatment and care were provided, which could result in the residents feeling uncomfortable during treatment and having their personal and medical record exposed to unauthorized individuals.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 03/12/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 11 of 20 Resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11), and two of the six carpeted floor halls (2100 and 2500) observed for cleanliness. The facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft for 1 of 7 (Resident #15) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized.The facility failed to ensure the carpeted floor halls on 2100 and 2500 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized.The facility failed to protect Resident #15's property (Stainless steel bedpan) from loss. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of eight residents (Residents #2, #5, and Resident #19) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that the resident was admitted to hospice. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that the resident was on oxygen therapy. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that the resident was using an AVAPS. These failures could place the resident at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regression in their overall health.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 03/11/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for four of twelve residents (Residents #14, #15, #19, and #29) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 was care planned for oxygen therapy. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 was care planned for congestive heart failure. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was care planned for her AVAPS. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's care plan reflected an intervention for her bed to be in the lowest position for fall prevention and a plan of care for Enteral feeding. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of hazards as was possible for ten of eleven residents (Residents #4, #7, #10, #11, #24, #31, #34, #74, #91, and #96) and for two of four LVNs (LVN B and LVN I) reviewed for accident hazards.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 had her fall prevention interventions which included a fall mat to each side of bed every shift for safety. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #4, #10, #11, #24, #34, #74, #91, and #96 were properly supervised while smoking in the smoking area of the facility and that Resident #4, #10, #24, #34, #74, #91, and #96 had quarterly smoking assessments completed.3. The facility failed to ensure that LVN B did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of her cart unattended on 03/10/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN I did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of his cart unattended on 03/10/2026.These failures placed residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three of twelve residents (Residents #5, #6 and #15) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 03/10/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 03/10/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's breathing mask was stored properly when not in use on 03/10/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 03/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with chronic pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to assess the resident for appropriateness and review the risks and benefits of grab/assist bars (smaller bars used by the person in bed to reposition themselves), with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #13, Resident #76, Resident #91) of 7 resident rooms observed and reviewed for grab/assist bars. The facility failed to have evidence of informed consents for Resident #1, Resident #13, Resident #76, and Resident #91 for grab/enabler bars to be placed on the bed. The facility failed to have evidence of assessments for Resident #1, Resident #13, Resident #76 and Resident #91, for risk of entrapment and ability to safely use the grab/enabler bars. These failures could affect residents who used grab/assist bars at risk of the resident/responsible party not being aware of the risks, informed consent not being obtained from the resident or responsible party, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were dated, labeled, and sealed appropriately. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure the ice scoop holder was thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure the ice chest on the 2500-hall was thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure the tea dispenser was covered with a lid. The facility failed to ensure the rinse temperature on the dishwasher was at the manufacturers required operating temperature of 180 degrees. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: During Observation on 03/10/26 at 8:57 am, a tea dispenser in the facility kitchen was observed with tea in it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of fifteen residents (Residents #5, #29, and Resident #38) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and CNA E performed hand hygiene before transferring Resident #5 on 03/10/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B wore a gown while administering Resident #29's medication via g-tube on 03/10/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA F performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves after touching the soiled draw sheet during Resident #38's incontinent care on 03/10/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 03/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that the transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record for one (Resident #105) of three residents reviewed for transfers and discharges.The facility failed to accurately document Resident #105's discharge on [DATE].This failure could prevent the resident or their caregivers from receiving necessary information about the resident's support needed for further care.Findings included:Review of Resident #105's Face Sheet, dated 03/11/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with heart failure and Type 2 Diabetes (high blood sugar levels). Record review of Resident #105's 's MDS Assessment, dated 02/17/26, reflected the resident's BIMS indicated an intact cognitive response. The MDS Assessment reflected the resident had active diagnoses of heart failure and Type 2 Diabetes.Record review of Resident #105's progress notes on 02/19/26 revealed Resident left AMA.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 2 of 11 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #65) reviewed for MDS transmission. Residents #1 and #65 Quarterly MDS assessments were completed but not transmitted within 14 days of completion. This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 3/11/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy (syndrome of brain dysfunction caused by systemic illness, organ failure, or toxin accumulation affecting consciousness, cognition and motor function) and other diagnoses including Adult Failure to Thrive, Acute Kidney Failure, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Bipolar II Disorder (chronic mental health condition characterized by a pattern of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #14). The facility failed to follow the facility's wound cleaning protocol for Resident #14's right heel dressing change. This failure put Resident #14 at risk of not receiving necessary treatments and a worsening of their wound.Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility initially on 10/23/2025 and again on 02/16/2026 with the following diagnoses: Pressure ulcer of sacral region (The sacral region refers to the area at the very base of the spine, located just above the buttocks and directly between the two hip bone), Cognitive communication deficit, Lack of coordination, Weakness. Record review of Resident #14's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that the resident had a BIMS score of 6 ( indicates severe cognitive impairment).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent development of pressure injuries for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident #31) The facility failed to apply foam boots to bilateral heel to prevent pressure ulcer for Resident #31. This failure can place the residents at risk for new development pressure injuries and could result in a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 03/10/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility initially on 12/13/2010 with the following diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes ((high blood sugar levels), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Convulsions (sudden, uncontrollable shaking or jerking of the muscles), Epilepsy (recurrent, unprovoked seizures caused by temporary, abnormal electrical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of five residents (Resident #44) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 had orders for her catheter. This failure could place residents with catheter at risk for urinary tract infection and other catheter- associated complications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's Face Sheet, dated 03/10/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder (the muscles and nerves that control the bladder do not work properly due to illness). Record review of Resident #14's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/29/2026, reflected that the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 06. The Comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complication of enteral feeding for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for enteral feeding. Resident #31 was not provided with an abdominal binder for G-tube site protection as ordered. This failure could place residents with a G-tube at risk of increased risk for infection and complications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 03/10/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility initially on 12/13/2010 with the following diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes ((high blood sugar levels), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Convulsions (sudden, uncontrollable shaking or jerking of the muscles), Epilepsy (recurrent, unprovoked seizures caused by temporary, abnormal electrical activity in the brain). Record review of Resident #31's MDS dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for administration of all drugs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's morning medications were recorded on the resident's MAR once administered to the resident on 03/03/26. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving duplicate medication and being overly medicated.Findings included: Record review of Resident #39's Face Sheet, dated 03/11/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39 had a diagnosis of heart disease. Record review of Resident #39's MDS Assessment, dated 01/08/26, reflected the resident's BIMS indicating an intact cognitive response. The MDS Assessment reflected the resident had active diagnoses of hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of twelve residents (Resident #90) and one (Medication Aide's Cart) of three carts reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #90 did not have any medications inside her room on 03/10/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure probiotics were refrigerated as per instruction of the manufacturer on 03/11/2026. These failures could place the residents at risk of accidental overdose, misuse of medications, not receiving the medication's full therapeutic benefits, and possible adverse reactions.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #90's Face Sheet, dated 03/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with dementia (a condition characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #3) of ten residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #3's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 06/17/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower part of the body) and weakness. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS (assessment used to determine functional capabilities and health needs) Assessment, dated 05/14/2025, reflected the resident had a severe impairment in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential and personal medical records for one (Residents #4) of one resident reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure LVN A closed, locked, or minimized her laptop's monitor when she left her cart on 06/17/2025 and Resident #4's medical information was visible. This failure could place the residents at risk of exposure of their personal and medical information to unauthorized individuals. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles and nerves that control the bladder do not work properly due to illness). Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 03/14/2025, reflected the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 00 (requires significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for feeding tube (a way of providing nutrition directly to the stomach). The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's, who had a g-tube (gastrostomy tube: a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), head of the bed was raised on 06/17/2025. This failure could place residents with g-tubes at risk for reflux and aspiration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 06/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 05/14/2025, reflected the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 03. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for six (Residents #1 and #2) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's breathing mask (used to receive medications by breathing in mist through nose and mouth) was properly stored when not in use on 06/17/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure an Oxygen in Use sign was placed outside of Resident #2's room when she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with respiratory failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored properly in locked compartments for one medication (wound cleanser solution) of one medication reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure that the wound cleanser solution was not left inside Resident #3's bedside. This failure could place the residents at risk of accidental consumption or misuse of medications. Findings included: Observation on 06/17/2025 at 9:46 AM revealed Resident #3 was in her bed with her eyes closed. It was observed that there was a bottle of wound cleanser solution on the resident's bedside table. Observation and interview on 06/17/2025 at 9:53 AM, LVN A said the wound cleanser was not supposed to be inside any resident's room. She said she did not notice the wound cleanser inside Resident #3's room when she did her morning rounds. She said she did not know who left the wound cleanser and if it was used for the resident because as far as she knew the resident did not have any wounds that needed cleansing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) to the maximum extent practicable for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to follow up with more information request after receiving notification from PASRR between 11/25/2024 and 12/01/2024, which led to a denial of physical therapy services for Resident #1. This failure could place all residents identified as mentally, intellectually and/or developmentally disabled at risk of not receiving specialized services and equipment to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 03/25/2025 at 2:24 PM revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included quadriplegia (loss of function of all four limbs,) unspecified intellectual disabilities, paranoid personality disorder, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 4 of 6 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, and #4) and all the facility hall floors reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms #1, #2, #3, and #4 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. 2. The facility failed to ensure the facility hallway floors were cleaned and sanitized. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings include: An observation on 02/18/25 at 08:19 AM of the facility hallways revealed large dark stains on the carpet areas and dark brown and black stains on the tiles, especially along the edges of the floor, near the walls. An observation on 02/18/25 at 08:20 AM of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure staff properly fed Resident #1 breakfast, while she was lying in bed. This deficient practice could place the resident at risk of not feeling as if they were being treated with dignity and respect while being fed. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/19/25, revealed a 62 -year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's relevant diagnoses included Cerebrovascular Disease (cognitive impairment), and contracture of muscle (shorten muscles). Record review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated cognitively intact and for ADL care it stated, For feeding, the resident required a one-person physical assist. Record review of Resident #1's Care plan, dated 01/25/25, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not stand over Resident #1 while assisting the resident with her meal in the dining room on 01/15/25. This failure could affect residents who require assistance with activities of daily living and place them at risk of feeling rushed to eat or not interested in eating, which could result in weight loss and decreased psycho-social well-being of anguish or frustration. The findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted [DATE] with a staff assessment BIMS score of 03 (Severely impaired). She had partial to moderate assist with eating and active diagnosis of other neurological conditions. She was diagnosed with anemia, hypertension, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorder, malnutrition, and anxiety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of eight residents (Resident #77 and Resident #199) reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA E changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #77 on 12/10/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #199 on 12/10/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure that RN B would not bring the whole container of test strips used for checking blood sugar inside Resident #77's room on 12/11/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings include: 1.Observation on 12/10/2024 at 10:01 AM revealed CNA E was about to do incontinent care for Resident #77. She prepared the things…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #49 and Resident #77) reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 had an order for oxygen administration. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #77's BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure - normalizes breathing by delivering pressurized air into the upper airway leading into the lungs) mask was properly stored. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's Face Sheet, dated 12/10/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted on [DATE] and the most recent admission date was 08/06/2023. Resident #49 admitted with chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two (Resident #86) residents were provided medications and/or biologicals and pharmaceutical services to meet their needs. The facility failed to ensure LPN C flushed the g-tube (a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) before and after each medication on 12/10/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Record review of Resident #86's Face Sheet, dated 12/11/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #86 was diagnosed with gastrostomy (medical procedure where a tube is inserted into the stomach) status. Record review of Resident #86's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/22/2024, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The resident was on tube feeding (delivery of nutrition through a tube inserted in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain all patient care equipment in the laundry room in safe operating condition. The facility failed to ensure one (the washer located near the back wall) of two washing machines in the laundry room was maintained. These failures could place residents at risk of contamination and improper laundering of items. Findings Included: An observation and interview 12/11/24 at 08:22 AM revealed sudsy water running from the door of a front-loading washer in the laundry room onto the floor below. The drain was directly in front of the washer. A trash bag was twisted and looped through the handle of the washer door and tied to a handle on the washer panel, just above the door. There was lime buildup along the front of the washer below the door and on the side of the washer. The laundry employee stated they had used the trash bag for 2 days to secure the washer door. Review of the maintenance log on 12/11/24 revealed there was no pending work order for the washer. During observation and interview 12/12/24 at 09:20, the Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to HHSC for 1 (Resident #1) of 6residents reviewed for reporting. The facility's Abuse Coordinator failed to report to HHSC Resident #1's elopement incident that occurred on 08/27/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of continued neglect. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 08/27/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 11/03/2019. Relevant diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, blindness in one eye, and macular degeneration (vision impairments.) Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS,) dated 06/21/2024 revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08. He was wheelchair bound and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect were investigated following reporting any alleged allegations to HHSC for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for investigation. The facility's Abuse Coordinator failed to investigate to HHSC Resident #1's elopement incident that occurred on 08/27/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 08/27/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 11/03/2019. Relevant diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, blindness in one eye, and macular degeneration (vision impairments.) Record review of Resident #1's Progress Note by LPN Y, dated 08/27/2024, revealed: Resident eloped from facility, found in parking lot in the front of the building. no s/s of distress noted, V/S are normal, noted resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that Resident #1 visual impairments. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 08/27/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 11/03/2019. Relevant diagnoses included blindness in one eye, and macular degeneration (vision impairments.) Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS,) dated 06/21/2024 revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08. Resident #1 was assessed as having adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of one facility reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure the foundation, walls, and ceiling were in good repair in the hallway to the right of the secretary's desk. 2. The facility failed to ensure the carpets were clean and stain free throughout the facility. These failures could affect all residents, resulting in falls and cross contamination which could lead to a decline in the resident's health and physical functioning. Findings included: Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #1, dated 04/23/24, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His cognitive status was moderately impaired. His diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease and heart failure. An observation on 05/21/24 at 9:25 AM revealed on the right side of the facility, close to the receptionist desk there were foundation problems. There was a downward slope…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #50) of one resident reviewed for respiratory/tracheostomy care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's tracheostomy shield was changed per week per physician order. This failure could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #50's Face Sheet dated 05/21/2024 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (condition where lungs cannot provide enough oxygen or remove enough carbon dioxide from the blood,) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (persistent, progressive breathlessness and cough,) tracheostomy (surgical opening made through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 15 of 30 resident rooms (Resident # 2, #3, #9, #12, #14, #16, #20, #21, #26 #28, #29, #38, #55, #94, and #200) , the handrails and the carpet throughout the facility observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that resident rooms on multiple halls (100 & 200 halls) were free of diirt and stains on the floors, walls, mini friidges and air-condition units. The facility failed to ensure handrails on all resident halls were free of dirt particles, stains, and dust. These failures could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Observation of Resident # 2 & #3 Room (on [DATE] at 10:40 AM revealed, the floor had a red circle stain near an Intravenous (IV) pole. The bottom of the (IV) pole had fluid stains all over it. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #35, #38, and #84) reviewed for ADLs care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Residents #35, #38, and #84 received baths or showers consistently based on records reviewed from 9/1/2023 - 10/18/2023 referencing resident showers. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #35's Face Sheet, dated 10/19/23, revealed she was a 75 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Muscle Weakness, Urinary Tract Infection, and Muscle Wasting. Record review of Resident #35's MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) and for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 (Resident #7, Resident 18, Resident 28, and Resident 31) of 10 residents were provided medications and/or biologicals and pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents. The facility failed to ensure CMA Y re-ordered medications on a timely manner for Resident #7 (Eliquis 2.5 mg). The facility failed to ensure CMA Y re-ordered medications on a timely manner for Resident #18 (Sertraline HCL 50 mg). The facility failed to ensure CMA Y re-ordered medications on a timely manner for Resident #28 (Tramadol 50 mg). The facility failed to ensure CMA Y re-ordered medications on a timely manner for Resident #31 (Metoprolol Tartrate 50 mg, Buspirone HCL 10 mg, Gabapentin 100 mg, Finasteride 5 mg, and Amlodipine Besylate 5 mg). These failures placed the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Resident #7 Review of 's Face Sheet dated 10/18/2023 reflected the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerators, and freezer were stored, labeled, and dated. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment were clean and sanitary. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other illnesses. Findings included: Findings observed on 10/17/23 from 09:10 AM to 09:35 AM in the facility's only kitchen include: Ice Scoop for Ice Machine had greenish gray stains on the back side of the scoop. One large tray that contained of sliced onions, tomatoes, and lettuce.s. Also on the tray was a large piece of cucumber and a block of sliced cheese not properly sealed in the walk-in refrigerator. One small white container containing a white creamy substance was unlabeled and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat 1 of 6 (Resident #38) residents reviewed with dignity and respect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's room was clean and sanitized, the facility failed to ensure the resident received activities of daily living care, and the facility failed to ensure the resident was free of any hazards. This failure could prevent residents from attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #38's Face Sheet, dated 10/19/23, revealed he was a 41 -year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer Disease (memory loss), Dysfunction of Bladder, Urinary Tract Infection, and Schizophrenia (hallucinations and delusions). Record review of Resident #38's MDS on dated 09/01/23 revealed he had a BIMS score of 13 (cognitively intact) and for ADL care it stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to manage the resident's funds for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #196) reviewed for Protection and Management of Personal Funds. The facility failed to manage the transfer of the Resident 196's Trust fund from the resident's prior living facility and the failed to manage the transfer of his Social Security funds from his prior living facility. This failure could place resident at risk of not being able or allowed to handle their personal affairs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #196's Face Sheet, dated 10/19/23, revealed he was a 72 -year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Record review of Resident #196's MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). Interview with Resident #196 on 10/19/23 at 10:00 AM revealed he had been at the facility since July 10, 2023. He advised that he had been trying to get his $60 spending since he arrived at the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had physician's orders for the resident's immediate care for two (Resident #41 and Resident #53) of six residents reviewed for admission orders. The facility failed to provide physician's orders for heel protectors as preventive measure for Resident #41 at the time of admission. The facility failed to provide physician's orders for oxygen supplement for Resident #53 at the time of admission. These failures could place the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care and services upon admission that could result to worsen condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #41's Face Sheet dated 10/17/2023 reflected that Resident #41was a 74 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified lack of coordination, urinary tract infection, major depressive depression, and unspecified pain. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #83's MDS accurately reflected Section I-Active diagnosis included I1700. Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO). The resident had candida auris (highly contagious illness). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Resident #83 Record review of Resident #83's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/22/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive status was severely impaired. Her diagnoses included seizure disorder, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, respiratory failure. She had a tracheostomy. Record review of Resident #83's Face Sheet, dated 10/19/23, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 4 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #41, Resident #50, Resident #53, and Resident #83) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's was care planned for heel protectors as a preventive measure. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's was care planned for Hospice care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's was care planned for oxygen. The facility failed to ensure Resident #83's Care Plan reflected she was on contact precautions for candida auris (highly contagious infection). These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings include: 1 .Review of Resident #41's Face Sheet dated 10/17/2023 reflected that Resident #41was a 74 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for 1 (Resident #53) of 6 residents reviewed for revised Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's care plan was revised to reflect discontinued use of CPAP/BiPAP. This failure could place the resident at risk of needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #53's Face Sheet dated 10/17/2023 reflected that resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute (sudden onset) and chronic (an illness persisting for a long time or constantly recurring), respiratory failure, unspecified cardiac arrythmia (abnormal heart rhythm), chronic pulmonary edema, and hypoxemia (low blood oxygen). Review of Resident #53's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, including but not limited to standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #43 and #45) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to record Residents #43 and #45's weekly weight on a as scheduled, utilizing a consistent method, for residents diagnosed with excessive weight loss. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing unobserved and untreated excessive weight loss. Findings included: Record review of Resident #43's Face Sheet, dated 10/19/23, revealed she was a 90 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included, Anorexia (eating disorder), Abnormal Weight loss, and Weakness. Record review of Resident #43's MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #5. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was admitted on [DATE], and was a [AGE] year-old female and her cognitive status was moderately impaired. Her diagnoses included heart failure and seizure disorder. She was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan, dated 01/11/23, reflected: The resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's prescribed Clotrimazole-Betamethasone was stored in a secured place. This failure could place all residents on the 2200 Hall at risk of drug diversion or misuse of medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/04/23, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: depression, type II diabetes, psychotic disorder, and orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 09/29/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function with an intervention to cue, reorient, and supervise resident as needed. The care plan did not address self-administration of medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for four (Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, and Resident #14) of ten residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure the call light systems in Resident #11's, #12's, #13's, and #14's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. Findings Included: Review of Resident #11's Face Sheet dated 09/25/2023 reflected that resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified dementia, major depressive order, epileptic seizures related to external causes, and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #11 had a severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 00. Resident #11 was totally dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of three (2600 Hall Treatment Cart) treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the 2600 Hall Treatment Cart was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings include: Observation on 09/14/23 at 10:20 AM, the 2600 Hall Treatment Cart unlocked which was determined by the lock not being pushed in. The 2600 Hall Treatment Cart was unattended in the hall and was not completely facing the resident room. LPN A exited a resident's room and took the soiled linens to the soiled linen closet and left the treatment cart unlocked. The Nurse Practitioner was near the cart and stated LPN A was working from the cart. Interview on 09/14/23 at 10:27 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for personal privacy. The Nurse practitoner and LPN A failed to provide privacy for Resident #1 during wound care and incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life due to a lack of privacy during their care . Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hyperlipidemia (elevated level of lipids) and esophageal reflux disorder (when your stomach contents come back up into your esophagus). Record review of Resident #1's initial MDS assessment, dated 09/11/23, revealed Resident #1's BIMS score was 14, which indicated his cognition was intact. The initial MDS had not been completed regarding toileting. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 11 of 6 (Resident #2) residents' bathrooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's bathroom was clear of soiled linens This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe or uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet undated, revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility initially on 12/14/20 and re admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of epilepsy (a chronic noncommunicable disease of the brain), Angina pectoris (chest pain or discomfort that keeps coming back), and metabolic encephalopathy (is caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood). Review of Resident #2 quarterly MDS assessment completed 06/27/23 revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Section G…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility (carpet throughout facility and rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) observed for a clean environment. The facility failed to ensure that the facility carpet and resident rooms were cleaned daily, and in accordance with the facility's Housekeeping Checklist. This deficient practice could negatively impact the facility's ability in preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms in residents' living areas and does not present a Clean Homelike Environment. Findings include: Observation on 08/29/23 at 09:00 AM revealed, the carpeted portion of the floors throughout the entire facility was heavily stained with dark dirt and grime. Observation on 08/29/23 at 11:14 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the corners of the resident room floor had old dried-up dirt along the edges of the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the Iced Tea dispenser, prepared for residents, was covered, and sealed from air-borne diseases. The facility failed to ensure the Ice machine, Ice Scooper, and Ice Scooper Holder was clean and sanitary. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings include: Observations on 08/29/23 at 12:30 PM in the kitchen include: Ice Machine was dirty on the inside of the ice machine and the machine was filled with ice. The top portion, over the ice, had dirt on the inner white plastic part of the machine that was over the ice and the Ice Machine door had a lot of old dirt particles in the springs of the door hinge. The Ice Machine Scoop was dirty, as it sat in the Ice Machine Scoop Holder, which was dirty on the inside and had a dark wet mud…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,977 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,977 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-17 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bear Creek Nursing And RehabilitationGrapevine, TX 1 of 5Cooney Healthcare And RehabilitationHelena, MT 1 of 5Deer Creek Nursing and RehabilitationWimberley, TX 1 of 5Ennis Care CenterEnnis, TX 1 of 5Greenview Nursing and RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Lakeshore Village Nursing And RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Memorial Medical Nursing And RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Pleasanton North Nursing And RehabilitationPleasanton, TX 1 of 5Rolling Hills HealthcareBelle Fourche, SD 1 of 5San Antonio North Nursing and RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Skyline Heights Nursing And RehabilitationBillings, MT 1 of 5The Meadows On UniversityFargo, ND 1 of 5The Suites PasadenaPasadena, TX 1 of 5Yellowstone River Nursing And RehabilitationBillings, MT 2 of 5Elkhorn Healthcare And RehabilitationClancy, MT 2 of 5Jourdanton Nursing and RehabilitationJourdanton, TX 2 of 5Keystone Post-AcuteFresno, CA 2 of 5Parkview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLockhart, TX 2 of 5Spearfish Canyon HealthcareSpearfish, SD 2 of 5The Suites Rio VistaRio Rancho, NM 3 of 5Cypress Woods Care CenterAngleton, TX 3 of 5Eastern Montana Veterans HomeGlendive, MT 3 of 5Silver Creek Nursing And RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 4 of 5Copper Ridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterButte, MT 4 of 5Hacienda Oaks At BeevilleBeeville, TX 4 of 5Heritage Trails Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCleburne, TX 4 of 5Pleasanton South Nursing and RehabilitationPleasanton, TX 4 of 5Prairie Heights HealthcareAberdeen, SD 5 of 5Bangs Nursing And RehabilitationBangs, TX 5 of 5Golden Years Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterMarlin, TX 5 of 5Highland Care CenterHolladay, UT 5 of 5Hurst Plaza Nursing and RehabHurst, TX 5 of 5Southwest Montana Veterans HomeButte, MT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2024
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2024
RICHARDSON NURSING AND REHAB CENTER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
CHEEKS, DONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
HERNANDEZ, MIGUELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$235K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 5%Other / private 8%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $235K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,707per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675109. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next