The Meadows On University

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.91 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #47) with weight loss. Failure to monitor/document intakes accurately and provide encouragement and assistance with meals and supplements resulted in a significant weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention occurred on 04/09/25. This policy, dated September 2008, stated, . The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents. 3. The Dietitian will review the weight record weekly to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. Provider will be updated with significant weight changes. Analysis . 1. Assessment information shall be analyzed by the multidisciplinary team and conclusions shall be made regarding the: . b. Approximate calorie,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of resident council meeting minutes, review of facility policy, confidential resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and related services are available to meet the residents' need for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Resident E, J, N, and P), and 12 supplemental residents (Resident A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I, K, L, M, and O) who required staff assistance. Failure to provide sufficient staffing does not promote each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and/or provide a safe environment for all residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Call lights: Accessibility and Timely Response occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated 06/15/25, stated, . All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate person should be notified. Review of resident council meeting minutes dated 12/15/25, 02/23/26, 03/20/26, and 04/17/26, identified residents reported long call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #1, #10, #30, and #55) who required assistance with bathing. Failure to provide bathing as scheduled may result in poor personal hygiene and decreased self-esteem. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated May 2025, stated, . A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. - Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The current care plan stated, has impaired physical functioning r/t [related to] fatigue and weakness . Shower/bathe . A [assist] [of] 1 . During an interview on 06/08/26 at 4:20 p.m., Resident #1 stated he/she requested two showers a week, but usually only receives one a week. Review of Resident #1's bathing/shower record identified showers scheduled twice weekly on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping services to prevent accidents on 1 of 4 days of survey (06/07/26). Failure to clean standing water from the floor placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk of falls and injury.Findings include: -Observation on 06/07/26 at 11:05 a.m. showed a trail of water on the floor extending down the central hallway. Observation of staff and residents walking in hallway. The water remained on the floor until 11:48 a.m. (43 minutes). -Observation on 06/07/26 at 11:30 a.m. showed water dripped from the ceiling air-conditioning unit into a bucket near the Dakota Dining Room. Observation showed a puddle of water surrounding the bucket and extended under and into the doorway threshold of the Dakota Dining Room. Staff propped a wet floor sign against the wall. Observation of staff and residents walking in hallway. The water remained on the floor until 1:10 p.m. (One hour and 40 minutes) -Observation on 06/07/26 at 2:28 p.m. showed water continued to drip into a bucket from the ceiling air-conditioning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored and monitored in a safe manner in 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 kitchenette observed. Failure to properly store, label, date, monitor, and discard food items may result in the consumption of unsafe food and place residents at risk for foodborne illness.Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, Monitoring of Cooler/Freezer Temperatures occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated 06/05/25, stated, . Refrigerated food shall be labeled, dated, and monitored so that it is used by the use by date . discarded . Review of facility policy titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors occurred on 06/10/26. This undated policy stated, . Food brought . will be labeled and stored in a manner that is clearly distinguishable . Containers will be labeled with the resident's name, the item and the 'use by' date. The food service staff will discard perishable foods on or before the 'use by' or three (3) days from opening date. will discard any foods . show obvious signs of potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policies, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #2 and #7) observed during cares, 1 of 5 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #19), and one laundry room. Failure to follow infection control standards related to hand hygiene, glove use, medication administration, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and storage of soiled/clean items within the laundry room has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 06/09/26. This policy, dated 04/11/25, stated, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Medicare Part A letters/notices, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or their representative completed the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #43 and #81) reviewed for termination of Medicare Part A services. Failure to ensure the completion of the SNFABN limited the resident/representative's ability to exercise their rights regarding Medicare Part A services.Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notices occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated 06/25/25, stated, . The facility shall inform Medicare beneficiaries of his or her potential liability for payment. the form shall comply with related instructions and regulations regarding the use of the form. The notice shall . obtain beneficiary or representative signature.- Review of Medicare Part A beneficiary notices identified Resident #43 discharged from Medicare Part A on 05/20/26. The SNFABN failed to identify if the resident/resident's representative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 4 of 4 days of survey. Failure to ensure the resident environment and equipment are kept clean and sanitary does not promote a homelike living environment or enhance the residents' quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated May 2025, stated, . In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment. - Observation on all days of survey showed large amounts of food debris on Resident #3's wheelchair and stains on the padded footrests. During an interview on 06/10/26 at 1:40 p.m. an administrative staff member (#1) stated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #30). Failure to update care plans limited the staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated May 2025, stated, . The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team . - Review of Resident #1's medical records occurred on all days of survey. A progress note dated 5/26/26, stated, . The resident informed this writer that, moving forward, he only wishes to see his sister in open areas of the building. and the resident has expressed that no further information is to be shared with her.Resident #1's care plan failed to include choices related to his sister's involvement with his care. - Review of Resident #30's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The care plan stated, . has potential for complications/injury…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident #57) observed with a wound dressing. Failure to follow physician's orders regarding dressing changes may result in delayed treatment, infection, and increased wound complications. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Clean Dressing Change occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated May 2025, stated, . It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection . Physician's orders will specify type of dressing change and frequency of changes. Assure dressing is labeled with initials and date.Review of Resident #57's medical record occurred on June 7, 9 and 10, 2026. A physician's order dated 06/02/26 stated, Skin tear to right lower extremity. Cleanse area, pat dry, keep steri strips intact. Cover with 4x4 gauze and secure with tape QD [every day] and prn [as needed].Observation on 06/07/26 at 4:30 p.m. showed an occlusive dressing to Resident #57's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 25 medications observed during medication administration. Two medication errors occurred during staff administration of 25 medications, which resulted in an eight percent error rate. Failure to follow facility policy and pharmacy instructions may inhibit the effectiveness of the medication, cause subtherapeutic levels, and may have a negative impact on the resident's overall health. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Insulin Pen occurred on 06/10/26. This policy, dated 06/05/25, states, . Prime the insulin pen . With the needle pointing up, push the plunger, watch to see that at least one drop of insulin appears on the tip of the needle.Review of manufacturer instructions for Advair Diskus (dry powder inhaler), occurred on 06/10/26. These instructions, revised March 2026, states, . ADVAIR DISKUS can cause serious side effects, including . fungal infection in your mouth or throat (thrush).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,041 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $41,041 — penalty dated 2025-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $363K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND