Copper Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 186 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 118 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, a licensed staff member failed to properly administer enteral tube feedings, for 1 (#1) of 2 sampled residents; and the facility nursing staff failed to have the enteral tube feeding order clarified further on receipt. The failure resulted in the resident being given the incorrect amount of tube feeding formula and the resident had a decline in status. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, sent to the State Survey Agency, dated 7/13/23, At 20:00 (8:00 p.m.) [Resident #1] was receiving her bedtime bolus via her feeding tube. [Resident #1] requested her feeding be stopped. This was done per her request. [Resident #1] was left sitting up in her recliner. At 21:30 (9:30 p.m.) [Resident #1] had audible congestion and an oxygen saturation of 46. Oxy mask was placed bringing her O2 sat to 77. At this time son requested transfer to ER for evaluation. This was done and [Resident #1] was transported via ambulance to ER. At 21:50 (9:50 p.m.) son called facility to report [Resident #1] has passed away. Investigation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, a licensed staff member failed to seek out necessary education or guidance to ensure competency for the skills and knowledge necessary for the administration of enteral tube feedings for a resident who was new to the unit, and who had complications with tube feedings, for 1 (#1) of 7 sampled residents. This deficiency resulted in the resident having a decline in status, and the resident was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation. Findings include: During an interview on 9/20/23 at 1:22 p.m., staff member A stated resident #1 was transferred from the 200 hall of the facility to the 400 hall on 7/13/23. Staff member A relayed staff member C had not cared for resident #1 before. Staff member A stated she got a call around 9:00 p.m., that night, that resident #1 was being sent to the ED for emesis and her O2 saturation was in the 40's. Staff member A stated staff member C administered four cartons of formula to resident #1 during his shift on 7/13/23. He (staff member C) put four cartons of formula into a graduate (cylinder)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a policy, but failed to implement a process to ensure food safety, including checking food expiration dates and monitoring refrigerator temperatures of resident personal refrigerators for 3 (#s 4, 14, and 51) of 34 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include:During an observation on 4/20/26 at 2:48 p.m., resident #4's personal refrigerator did not have a temperature gauge on the inside of the refrigerator or a temperature log to record the temperature. On the inside of the refrigerator, there was a cup of cauliflower and carrots wrapped in a bag in the back of the refrigerator that had a noticeable odor when the refrigerator door was opened. There was no date on the vegetables. There was also no date on the [NAME] syrup. During a follow up interview on 4/20/26 at 4:12 p.m., resident #4 stated she checked her own fridge for spoiled food. She stated staff did check the temperature, but would not use a thermometer.During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification to a physician regarding a resident's severe weight loss, resulting in a lack of physician assessment and involvement, which did not allow the physician the opportunity to recommend or implement interventions for 1 (#3) of 16 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of resident #3's weight record showed a severe weight loss of 9.73% from the resident's admission date of 3/10/26 to 4/21/26. The resident's weight on admission was 182 pounds and declined to 164.3 pounds.During an interview on 4/21/26 at 3:56 p.m., staff member G stated she had been following resident #3 closely since admission. Staff member G stated she had been making ongoing changes to accommodate the resident's nutritional needs and did not notify the medical provider of the resident's weight loss but would do so today (4/21/26).During an interview on 4/23/26 at 10:28 a.m., staff member B stated the dietician is responsible for reporting a resident's weight loss to the medical provider. Staff member B stated resident #3's weight loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete an Annual and Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident's pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR), for 2 (#s 7 and 11) of 34 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include:During an interview on 4/23/26 at 8:54 a.m., staff member F stated resident #7's PASARR Level One was completed on 1/15/24, and PASARR Level Two was completed on 1/22/24. Staff member F stated that when she completed section A of resident #7's MDS submission on 12/29/25, she did not think to look at the resident's PASARR information because the system pre-populated the resident's demographic information. Staff member F stated the same thing occurred with resident #11's Significant Change in Status assessment, which was completed on 3/18/26. Staff member F stated, I will need to start double-checking section A of the MDS assessment. Staff member F stated resident #7 and #11 did not have any disruption in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly obtain a new PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level One screen, upon re-admission from the hospital for a resident who had a significant change in mental status, for 1 (#68) of 16 sampled residents. Findings include:A review of a facility document in resident #68's EHR showed a request for a PASARR Level One review, dated 11/4/22.A review of a progress note for resident #68 in the facility's EHR, dated 4/8/26 at 10:35 a.m., showed, [Resident #68] reported to charge nurse and to myself that she had awakened hearing voices and that she was frightened. She reported that the voices were repeating 'Knife, knife, and kill, kill, kill.' [Resident #68] verbalized being afraid that she may act on the hallucinations . [sic]A review of a progress note for resident #68 in the facility's EHR, dated 4/8/26 at 10:45 a.m., showed, . This writer sat with [Resident #68] until EMS arrived to transport [Resident #68] to the Emergency Department…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise resident care plans to reflect the Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status for 2 (#s 50 and 74) of 34 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include:During an interview on [DATE] at 8:21 a.m., staff member J stated resident care plans were updated weekly by the interdisciplinary team. Staff member J stated the nurse can also update the resident's care plan if an immediate update was necessary. Staff member J stated she was not sure why resident #50 and #74's care plan did not reflect their code status.1. Review of resident #50's POLST dated [DATE] showed, section A No CPR.During a review of resident #50's care plan on [DATE], the following entries were documented: Focus: [Resident #50] has an advance Directive as evidenced by: Full codeGoal [Resident #50's] wishes will be honoredIntervention: Will review POLST every 3 months, and upon [Resident #50's] request, to ensure wishes are being followed .2. Review of resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician personally conducted an initial comprehensive visit within the first 30 days after admission for 1 (#3) of 16 sampled residents. The failure increased the risk of missed resident care needs. Findings include:During an interview on 4/22/26 at 3:00 p.m., staff member A stated resident #3 was seen by a physician assistant at the facility on 4/21/26. Staff member A stated there was 10-day slippage for provider visits and the visit on 4/21/26 would meet the deadline for resident #3's 30-day physician visit. Staff member A stated the facility had contracted with a new physician; however, the physician's state license was still pending.During an interview on 4/23/26 at 10:28 a.m., staff member B stated she thought resident #3 was seen by the provider the week of 4/8/26. Staff member B stated she would look for the physician's note.Review of resident #3's hospital discharge noted dated 3/10/26, showed resident #3 had several chronic medical conditions which would require monitoring and medical management,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was not a 5% or greater medication error rate. The observed medication error rate was 10.34% for 2 (#s 13 and 38) of 34 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 4/21/26 at 8:15 a.m., staff member K prepared the medications for resident #38 (amlodipine, clopidogrel, aspirin, multivitamin, norco, Senna Plus, and pantoprazole). The pantoprazole administration time shown on the MAR was 7:00 a.m. and was shown to be late. Staff member K stated the pantoprazole should have been given before resident #38 ate breakfast for the medication to have the best efficacy. Staff member K stated they often had to give this medication at the same time as the other medications (at 8:00 a.m.) if staff member K was running late on morning tasks. Staff member K stated resident #38 was currently in the dining room. Staff member K also put one tablet of Senna Plus in the medication cup and then continued to prepare the norco (hydrocodone/acetaminophen). The surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure each resident had access to call lights for 4 (#s 16, 24, 49, and 54); and failed to prevent elopements for 1 (#54) of 22 sampled residents. These deficient practices placed residents at risk of falls, injuries, elopements, or a negative outcome if a medical crisis occurred, and the resident could not call for assistance. Findings include: 1. Call lights not in reach a. During an observation on 4/7/25 at 10:00 a.m., resident #16 was attempting to access his call light. Resident #16 had left-sided weakness from a stroke and was unable to maneuver his wheelchair to the call light hanging off the wall tied to his bed. Resident #16 continued to attempt to reach his call light for three minutes and then called for help by yelling at a staff member walking by. b. During an observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 2:29 p.m., resident #24 stated he needed help, and no one would help him. Resident #24 stated, I can't breathe. Resident #24's call light was not within reach. This surveyor pushed the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were educated on policies and procedures for the use of personal protective equipment, for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions, for 1 (#57) of 16 sampled residents for enhanced barrier precautions. This deficient practice increased the risk of infection for all residents related to staff not adhering to proper EBPs. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 10:22 a.m., staff member P was exiting a resident's room with trash. A sign was on the door reflecting the resident was on EBP precautions. Staff member P stated she did not know what EBP stood for or what the precautions were for the resident. Staff member P stated she was in orientation, but she was currently working the floor by herself. Staff member P stated her trainer went to lunch. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 11:24 a.m., staff member Q stated, I don't know what EBP is . I think Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used when someone has an infection or C-Diff; we (staff) would then wear a gown and gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain areas of the building in need of repair for 3 (#s 11, 19, and 27) of 22 sampled residents; and, failed to maintain a clean environment related to housekeeping services, for 1 (#57) of 22 sampled residents. Residents were concerned about lack of repairs and unclean areas identified. Findings include: 1. Wall repairs a. During an observation and interview, on 4/7/25 at 12:30 p.m., resident #19's room had 13 circular shaped holes, approximately one centimeter each in diameter, in the wall next to a grab bar. Resident #19 stated she told staff member M a while ago, I guess he just forgot, it would be nice if he fixed it soon, someday I guess he will. b. During an observation and interview on 4/8/25 at 10:08 a.m., in resident #11's room, there was long vertical jagged gouges, in the wall and above the head of her bed, all approximately twelve to twenty inches in length and one inch in width. Resident #11 stated, My wall has been really banged up for a while. I'm not sure if there are plans to fix it. c.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,311 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-09-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDURO HEALTHCARE — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $443K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT