West Gardena Post Acute
16530 S Broadway Street, Gardena, CA 90248 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (310) 329-9929 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $43,004 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 48.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.91 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
30.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 30.1%CMS range 21.4–42.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.1–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 5.8–14.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.58 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 44.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was notified when the resident had a change of condition (COC) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) and LVN 2 promptly notified Resident 1's physician when Resident 1 had loose/watery stools for five days as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status. 2. Ensure nursing staff implemented Resident 1's Care Plan titled, Resident at Risk for Constipation, by monitoring the amount, consistency, and frequency of Resident 1's bowel movements. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in care and treatment for Resident 1, who was eventually transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 7/6/24 where she underwent an emergent total colectomy (a surgical procedure to remove the entire colon), a gastric wedge resection (a surgical procedure in which a wedge shaped portion of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a certified nursing assistant (CNA 1) did not turn and reposition a resident (Resident 1), who required a two-person physical assist with bed mobility, by himself, without the assistance of another staff for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 falling from bed and sustaining a left parietal (near the back and top of head) scalp hematoma (an injury that causes blood to collect and pool under the skin resulting in a spongy, rubbery, lumpy feel) and laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin or flesh) with a potential for Resident 1 to sustain more serious consequences such has a brain injury, fractures (a partial or complete break in the bone) and death. On 10/14/2023 Resident 1 was transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for evaluation and treatment of her head wound. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prescribers of psychotropic medications (drugs that affect mood, behavior, or mental processes and are used to treat certain mental health conditions) personally provided information and obtained informed consent from the residents and/or their responsible parties for two of five sampled residents (Residents 17 and 45).This failure had the potential to result in miscommunication or misunderstanding between the prescribers and the residents or their representatives regarding the purpose, risks, and benefits of the prescribed medications.Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 45 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a condition where there is a decline in cognitive function that affects memory, thinking, and social abilities), psychosis (mental health condition characterized by a disconnection from reality,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Residents 10 and 32) received their scheduled 9:00 a.m. medications within the required one-hour administration window.This failure had the potential to result in delays in treatment, which may affect the residents' health conditions. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/2025 at 10:16 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 was observed in the hallway of Station 1 with a medication cart. LVN 1 stated that she still had two residents waiting to receive their morning medications and pointed to a nearby resident room, which roomed Residents 10 and 32. During an interview on 9/30/2025 at 10:21 a.m., LVN 1 stated she would begin preparing medications for Resident 10. During an observation on 9/30/2025 at 10:34 a.m., LVN 1 was observed obtaining a blood pressure reading for Resident 32 During an interview on 9/30/2025 at 10:35 a.m., LVN 1 stated that Resident 32 would be the last resident to receive medications during the morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to improve or maintain range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for three of six sampled residents (Residents 7, 9, and 39) with ROM concerns by failing to: 1.Objectively measure Resident 7's limited ROM in both hips and both knees during the Physical Therapy (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) Evaluation, dated 11/24/2024. 2.Objectively measure Resident 39's limited finger ROM of the right hand during the Occupational Therapy (OT, profession that provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) Evaluation, dated 5/14/2025. 3.Provide ROM exercises to Resident 9's right hand and right wrist during a Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) session in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an organized medication storage system in the medication room. Medications were found stored in buckets labeled for different medications, and the overall storage lacked a systematic organization (example: alphabetical or by drug class). This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication errors and/or delays in administration if licensed staff were unable to locate the correct medication promptly.Findings: During an interview on 11/18/2025 at 11:05 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the facility had two (2) nursing stations and 1 medication room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/2025 at 11:30 a.m., with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) in the medication (med) room located between the two nursing stations, observed to contain two walls of shelving with gallon sized buckets. A posted sign read Charge nurses please make sure to maintain organization and cleanliness of this med room. LVN 2 stated the buckets contained over the counter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner by failing to:Ensure the freezer's temperature was not greater than zero degrees Fahrenheit (F-unit of measurement) while frozen items were stored.Ensure an open bag of popsicles was dated and labeled with open date and use by date.Ensure an open bag of frozen burritos was dated with open date and stored in a sealed bag.Ensure the cook performed hand hygiene after the removal of used gloves and before removing the baked burritos from the oven.These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites).Findings:1. During an initial tour of kitchen observation and interview on 9/30/2025 at 8:30 a.m. with [NAME] (CK)1, the reach in freezer had a temperature of 39 degrees F. CK 1 stated the kitchen staff were restocking frozen items in the freezer that was why the freezer's temperature was high.During a concurrent observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nursing Aides (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) accurately documented RNA services provided for two of six sampled residents (Residents 7 and 9) in 5/2025, 6/2025, and 7/2025. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the provision of necessary care and services due to the inaccurate reflection of services provided. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 7 on 12/7/2020 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), contractures of both knees, both elbows, and both hands, and chronic a chronic diabetic ulcer (persistent open wound that fails to show significant healing) of the left foot. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and observe infection control measures for two of six sampled residents (Residents 6 and 7) by failing to:1.Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 wore an isolation gown (protective apparel used to protect the wearer from the transfer of microorganisms and body fluids) while assisting with range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) exercises to Resident 6's both knees and both ankles which required direct contact with Resident 6 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [microorganisms, predominantly bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents]). 2.Ensure CNA 2 wore an isolation gown while assisting with range of motion to Resident 7's both hands and repositioning Resident 7's both legs which required direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the reach in freezer for frozen vegetables and frozen meat products in the kitchen were maintained and kept in a safe and operating condition by failing to:1. Follow their policy and procedure titled Freezer Storage which indicated to maintain a temperature of zero-degree Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement) or lower.This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses or parasites).Findings:During an initial tour of kitchen observation and interview on 9/30/2025 at 8:30 a.m. with [NAME] (CK)1, the reach in freezer had a temperature of 39 degrees F. CK 1 stated the kitchen staff was restocking frozen items in the freezer that was why the freezer's temperature was high.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/2025 at 10:52 with the Dietary Manager (DM), the reach in freezer had a temperature of 12 degrees F. The DM stated the temperature of freezer should be -10 degrees to 0 degrees F…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a change of condition (COC, major decline or improvement in a resident's status that will not resolve itself without intervention) to the physician for one of six sampled residents (Resident 39) when a decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) of Resident 39's both hands were identified on the Joint Mobility Assessment (JMA, a brief assessment of a resident's ROM in both arms and both legs), dated 3/20/2025. This failure resulted in Resident 39 not receiving the appropriate services and interventions to address and improve ROM, prevent contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to joint stiffness), and improve overall mobility and physical functioning.Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 39 on 5/5/2021 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and annual review of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurately documented for two of four residents (Residents 17 and 45).This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inappropriate placement and delay of needed services for Resident's 17 and 45.Findings: A. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for the assessment and application of splints (a device used to restrict, protect, or immobilize a part of the body to support function and increase ROM) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 27). The facility failed to: 1.Ensure the Director of Rehab (DOR) who was a Physical Therapist (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) performed an assessment to determine the appropriateness, fit, and splint wear time tolerance (length of time and frequency a person can tolerate wearing the splint for safety, comfort, and maximal benefits) of Resident 27's right knee splint. 2.Ensure the Occupational Therapist (OT, profession that provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) performed an assessment to determine the appropriateness, fit, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 7) who was assessed as being at risk for pressure ulcer ( localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) development was provided a pressure relieving barrier to be placed between Resident 7's overlapping, contracted (loss of motion of a joint associated with stiffness and joint deformity) toes of the right foot per facility's policy and procedure titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to develop pressure ulcers on the right foot. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 7 on 12/7/2020 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 31) humidifier bottle (a medical device used with oxygen therapy to add moisture to dry oxygen) was dated with the last change date.This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to receive oxygen through equipment that may not have been maintained according to infection control standards.Findings:During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (any disorder that affects the brain's function or structure), muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), and dependence on supplemental oxygen.During a review of Resident 31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool) dated 9/5/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 31 needed oxygen therapy.During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 diluted potassium chloride oral solution (a medication used to treat and prevent low potassium levels) prior to administration per physician order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 22).This failure had the potential to cause adverse effects, which may impact the resident's health condition.Findings: During an observation on 9/30/2025 at 9:24 a.m., LVN 5) was preparing medications for Resident 22. LVN 5 poured 30 milliliters (ml, unit to measure volume) of potassium chloride 20 milliequivalents (mEq, unit to measure mass) per 15 ml into a medication cup to a line marked 30 ml. During a medication administration observation on 9/30/2025 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 22 was observed having difficulty taking 30 ml of potassium chloride oral solution directly from a medicine cup. Observed Resident 22 displayed an unpleasant facial expression. During an observation on 9/30/2025 at 10:03 a.m., Resident 22 was observed consuming 30 ml of potassium chloride oral solution.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one of two sample residents (Resident 62) in a timely manner by failing to:1. Refer Resident 62 to the dentist for recurrent toothache.2. follow up Resident 62 dental x-rays (a special camera that takes pictures of the inside of the mouth, teeth and jaw) result.These failures had the potential to put Resident 62 for unnecessary pain and increased risk of gum disease.Findings:During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses including myocardial infarction (MI- heart attack), angina pectoris (chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart muscle), heart failure (heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen) and hyperlipidemia (high level of fats in the blood).During a review of Resident 62's History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/8/2025, the H&P indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lunch meal for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) was fortified (foods have protein, carbohydrates, and/or fats added to increase the total nutritional value of the food) as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to result in inadequate caloric and nutritional intake which could lead to unplanned weight loss, decreased strength, and a decline in overall health status.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (any disorder that affects the brain's function or structure), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (poor nutrition).During a review of Resident 3's quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship (refers to a set commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 64). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 64 to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use.Findings:During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility 10/14/2025 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 10/21/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 64's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was moderately impaired and was dependent (helper does all the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0907 — isolatedProvide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the therapy mat (a padded surface used for therapeutic treatment) in the Rehabilitation Gym (Rehab Gym) was maintained in a clean and unobstructed condition. The mat was observed to be cluttered with various miscellaneous items, including multiple cardboard boxes, a cushion pad, inflatable balls, a large paper towel roll, bags, splints (rigid devices used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint), a wooden device with plastic rings, folded linen, and personal belongings of staff. This failure had the potential to limit the availability and use of therapeutic equipment, reduce usable treatment space for residents during rehab therapy. Findings: During an observation of the Rehab gym on 9/30/2025 at 4:10 p.m., observed four cardboard boxes, a blue cushion pad, two inflatable balls, a large paper towel roll, a large bag containing splints, two sets of leg splints, a wooden device with plastic rings, folded linen, a personal carrying bag, cell phone, eye glasses, and an eyeglass case…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained when cockroaches were observed in the kitchen. This deficient practice resulted in the facility's kitchen being closed for use to the residents and had the potential to spread bacteria and viruses that cause illness, affecting the population of residents in the facility (44) who resided in there and who received food from the facility's kitchen by consuming potentially contaminated food.Findings: During an observation on 7/11/2025, at 2:19 p.m., of the facility's dry food storage area in their kitchen, in the presence of the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), a medium sized dark brown cockroach was seen running out of a box of white powdered thickener that was inside an open plastic bag. During an observation on 7/11/2025, at 2:26 p.m., of the facility's dry food storage area in their kitchen, in the presence of the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), a medium sized dark brown cockroach was seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 4 and 19) was provided their activities of choice (preference). This failure had the potential for Resident 4 and 19 to have no mental and emotional interaction that could negatively impact their quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy (diseases of the heart muscle, where the walls of the heart chambers have become stretched, thickened, or stiff), depression (a common mental health condition that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and changes in how you think, sleep, eat and act), and atrial fibrillation (an irregular or abnormal heart beat and often very rapid heart rhythm). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/13/2024, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 12 sampled resident (Resident 25) advance directive (a legal document that specifies what actions should be taken for your health if you are no longer able to make decisions for yourself) had a signature of a witness when it was signed by Resident 25. This failure had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care in the event residents became incapacitated (unable to participate in a meaningful way in medical decisions) or unable to make medical decisions that would not be identified and/or carried out by the facility staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record. the admission Record indicated, Resident 25 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter the blood properly), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate safety precautions to residents at risk for fall and seizures (involuntary muscle movement) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 246, 4). Facility failed to ensure: a. Resident 246, who was on fall risk precaution with one floor mat placed on the left corner of the bed had no foot metal bedside table on top of the floor mat. b. Resident 4, who was placed on fall precautions and seizure precaution with a floor mat by the left corner of the bed had no big sized wheelchair placed on top of the floor mat. This deficient practice had the potential for injury when Residents 246 and 4 would fall out of bed and hit their head on the metal equipment placed on top of the floor mat. Findings: During a review of Resident 246's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 246 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosed including muscle weakness, lack of coordination (impairment in movement), fracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess for pain before wound care treatment on one of three sampled residents (Resident 246) who had a skin tear on right upper knee. This failure had the potential for Resident 246 to experience unrelieved pain during wound care treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 246's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 246 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness, lack of coordination (impairment in movement), fracture (broken bone) of other part of pelvis (hip bones). During a review of Resident 246's Minimum Data Set (MDS, ([MDS] a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/23/24, indicated Resident 246 had severe cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) impairment. During a review of Resident 246's Physician Order dated 9/16/24, the Physician Order indicated to clean the wound with normal saline (NS-cleaning solution for the wound), pat dry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Clarify physician order for Combivent (generic name - ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate Inhalation Aerosol [a medication in form of inhalation spray to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease {COPD} - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) in accordance with manufacturer's specifications for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 14) during medication administration. 2. Ensure availability of Combivent as ordered by the prescriber for one of ten residents (Resident 14). These failures had the potential to cause duplication of therapy and/or result in worsening of COPD symptoms such as difficulty breathing, and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, dated [DATE], the admission Record indicated, Resident 14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD and sleep apnea (a sleep disorder that causes people to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two facility exit doors, the lobby door (Door 1) and front door (Door 2), were secured to prevent the elopement (an unauthorized departure of a resident without the facility's knowledge and supervision) of one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), a resident who had a history of elopement and assessed as high risk for elopement. As a result of these deficient practices, Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 7/3/2024 and was without his medications including olanzapine (medication to treat schizophrenia) 15 milligrams twice a day for ten days. Resident 1 was located by facility staff on 7/13/2024 and subsequently transferred to a general acute care facility (GACH) for further evaluation. At the GACH, Resident 1 was admitted with a diagnosis including acute psychosis (collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), severe anemia (not enough red blood cells in the body), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement one of four sampled resident ' s (Resident 1) care plan to ensure Resident 1 was wearing his Wander guard (bracelets that residents wear, sensors that monitor doors and a technology platform that sends safety alerts in real time), and that Resident 1 was not going to leave the premises unassisted. As a result of these deficient practices, Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 7/3/2024 and was without his medications including olanzapine (medication to treat schizophrenia) 15 milligrams twice a day for ten days. Resident 1 was located by facility staff on 7/13/2024 and subsequently transferred to a general acute care facility (GACH) for further evaluation. At the GACH, Resident 1 was admitted with a diagnosis including acute psychosis (collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), severe anemia (not enough red blood cells in the body), and Resident 1 received a blood transfusion (process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement one of four sampled resident ' s (Resident 1) care plan to ensure Resident 1 was wearing his Wander guard (bracelets that residents wear, sensors that monitor doors and a technology platform that sends safety alerts in real time), and that Resident 1 was not going to leave the premises unassisted. As a result of these deficient practices, Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 7/3/2024 and was without his medications including olanzapine (medication to treat schizophrenia) 15 milligrams twice a day for ten days. Resident 1 was located by facility staff on 7/13/2024 and subsequently transferred to a general acute care facility (GACH) for further evaluation. At the GACH, Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including acute psychosis (collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), severe anemia (not enough red blood cells in the body), and Resident 1 received a blood transfusion (process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed and implemented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) addressing Resident 1's laceration (a wound that occur when skin or muscle is torn or cut open) on the forehead. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an infected laceration that could pose as a threat to Resident 1's overall health and wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted at the facility on 7/12/2024 with a diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), hypertension (a blood pressure [force it takes for blood to circulate in the body] higher than normal) and dementia (a condition when the loss of cognitive function such as thinking, remembering and reasoning interferes with a person's daily life and activities). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled resident's (Resident 1) laceration (a wound that occur when soft tissue such as skin or muscle is torn or cut open) on the forehead had documented monitoring for signs and symptoms of infection and complications after the resident sustained a fall on 2/29/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an infected laceration that could pose as a threat to Resident 1's overall health and wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted at the facility on 7/12/2024 with a diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), hypertension (a blood pressure [force it takes for blood to circulate in the body] higher than normal) and dementia (a condition when the loss of cognitive function such as thinking, remembering and reasoning interferes with a person's daily life and activities). During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served food in a sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness (also called food poisoning caused by eating contaminated food or eating food not kept at appropriate temperatures) by failing to: 1.Ensure dishes were washed and rinsed at the correct temperature of 120-140 degrees Fahrenheit ([ °F] a scale of temperature) on a low temperature dishwasher. 2.Ensure frozen health shakes have been thawed by immersing under running water 3.Ensure cream pies and pastries were properly sealed, stored in the freezer and labeled with an open date. These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea (feeling of sickness with an inclination to vomit), vomiting (eject matter from the stomach through the mouth), diarrhea (loose stool), and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization for 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed obtain recommended Level II preadmission screening and resident review evaluation ([PASARR]-a mental health evaluation done to determine if an individual can benefit from specialized mental health services) for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 38) This deficient practice placed Resident 4 and Resident 38 at risk of inappropriate placement, not receiving necessary care, and unidentified specialized services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves), dementia (a decline in memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking skills that affect a person's ability to perform everyday activities), and epilepsy (a brain disorder that cause recurring seizures (a sudden uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 24) received proper assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities by not assisting in arranging for audiologist (diagnose, manage, and treat patients who have hearing, balance, or related problems) referral consults to replace missing hearing aids. This deficient practice resulted in delay of services and Resident 24 not able to hear adequately during a conversation, and provision of care. Findings: During an observation on 9/29/2023 at 9:45 a.m. in Resident 24's room, observed Resident 24 lying in bed with no hearing aids in both ears. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (Face Sheet) dated 10/24/2021, indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including blindness of the left eye, hypertension (high blood pressure) and stage 4 pressure ulcer (damage to the skin and tissue loss, reaching into muscle and bone). During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 5) who was admitted to the facility with an indwelling suprapubic urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder through the stomach to drain urine) received appropriate care, services and followed physician orders to send a urine specimen for urinalysis (UA -urine test) and urine culture and sensitivity (urine C/S- used to diagnose a urinary tract infection [UTI] an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra) when Resident 5 complained of burning sensation on urination. This deficient practice resulted in continued discomfort to Resident 5 and had the potential for Resident 5 to experience continued signs and symptoms of UTI and the potential to have a kidney or prostate (a gland in the male reproductive system) infection that could lead to sepsis (blood stream infection). Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Check residents' identification band (wrist band) prior to medication administration for four of five sampled residents (Resident 17, 21, 23 and 37). This deficient practice had the potential for medication error including administering medication to the wrong resident. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 3 signed narcotics reconciliation record ( a record of narcotic or controlled substance inventory) after taking the controlled (a medication with a high abuse potential) medication for one of one sampled residents (Resident 99) according to facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential for loss of accountability, which affected the controls against drug loss, diversion, or theft. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 24 residents' rooms met 80 square feet (sq. ft- a unit of area measurement) per residents in multibed resident rooms. Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, and 26 were occupied with at least two residents. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were occupied with three residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: During an observation on 9/30/2025 at 10:17 a.m. an initial tour of the facility was done. Residents' rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15,16,17, 18, 19, 20, 21,22. 23, 25, and 26, did not meet the requirement of 80 sq. ft per resident. During an observation on 11/19/2025 at 2:31 p.m., some residents were in their rooms, able to move freely, and open drawers on their nightstand. Nurses were able to perform patient care, and the resident size of room did not affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 21 of 25 residents rooms met of 80 square feet ([sq. ft] a unit of area measurement) per residents in multi-bed resident rooms. Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, and 26 were occupied with two residents and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied with three residents per room, and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied with four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: On 10/01/24 at 1:57 p.m., during the initial tour of the facility, residents' rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, and 26, did not meet the requirement of 80 sq. ft per resident. A review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provided by the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12 ,14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23, 25, and 26 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 21 of 25 residents rooms met of 80 square feet ([sq. ft] a unit of area measurement) per residents in multi-bed resident rooms. Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, and 26 were occupied with two residents and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied with three residents per room, and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied with four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: On 9/29/23 at 9:23 am, during the initial tour of the facility, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, and 26, residents' rooms did not meet the requirement of 80 sq. ft per resident. A review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provided by the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12 ,14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23, 25, and 26 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$43,004 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $34,660 — penalty dated 2024-07-05
- $8,344 — penalty dated 2023-10-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEHMANN, KENNETH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | 32% | since 09/06/2019 |
| BAK, ABRAHAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/13/2016 |
| GASTWIRTH, MENACHEM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/19/2020 |
| OFOEGBU, KINGSLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/13/2022 |
| PANGILINAN, VIOLETA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| BAK, RACHEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/13/2016 |
| 16530 SOUTH BROADWAY STREET,LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/06/2019 |
| ABAK CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2021 |
| ABE AND RACHEL BAK FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/10/2021 |
| BAGZ HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/10/2021 |
| MGAZ CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2021 |
| BAK, JUDA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/06/2019 |
| GASTWIRTH, HENRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/06/2019 |
| GEWIRTZ, CHONOCH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/07/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.