Gem TCU
716 South Fair Oaks Ave, Pasadena, CA 91105 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (626) 737-0560 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (87) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,808 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-16)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 5.42 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.44 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 41.1–56.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 15.6%CMS range 12.0–19.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 20.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 20.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 13.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 5.5–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.41 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
87 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 75 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-16 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to provide treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well- being of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who was diagnosed with depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops you doing your normal activities) anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and borderline personality disorder (a mental health condition that affects the way people feel about themselves and others, making it hard to function in everyday life) and who was identified as being danger to self and others (DTSO- the probability that a person will inflict serious physical injury upon the person or another person in the near future) on 4/28/2025 by failing to: 1. Ensure 1:1 sitter (provide one to one nursing or observation care to an individual patient for a period of time) intervention were put in place for Resident 1 who refused to be sent to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 4/28/2025 due to DTSO. 2. Monitor and document Resident 1 behavior of verbalizing possibly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one (1) of three (3) sample residents by failing to ensure Resident 1 did not possess one bottle of alcoholic beverage and eight (8) medication bottles from Pharmacy 2 (outside pharmacy) labeled with Resident 1's name while the resident is residing in the facility in accordance with the facility's policy titled Restricted Item /Contraband. As a result of noncompliance, on 5/12/2025 at 5:20 AM, Resident 1 was found unresponsive by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) with two (2) opened prescription plastic containers of doxepin (medication to treat anxiety or depression - unknown dosage) and 1 bottle of ondansetron (medication used to prevent nausea and vomiting- unknown dosage). Resident 1 was sent to GACH via 911 (the telephone number used to reach emergency medical, fire, and police services) and was assessed in GACH' ER with Glascow Coma Scale (GCS- neurological assessment tool used to evaluate a patient's level of consciousness. The score ranges from 3 [deep comatose {state of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functional call light for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Call System (an emergency, nurse, or service-oriented communication setup that allows users to push a button to alert staff or caregivers), Resident. These failures had the potential to put Residents 2 and 3 at risk of experiencing delays in receiving assistance from facility staff, which could lead to an accident or injury.Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 2 's admission Record, it indicated, the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when there is a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel), muscle weakness , and urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection of the bladder and urinary system) and urinary retention (a condition that makes it difficult to empty the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to revise the care plan (a dynamic, written document outlining a patient's health needs, goals, and customized interventions, formulated through assessment) for the use of mechanical lift (a device used to safely transfer individuals with limited mobility between beds, wheelchairs, and chairs, reducing physical strain on caregivers) for one of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated on the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive resident specific interventions to ensure safety.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hemiplegia (a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a mild loss of strength in a leg, arm, or face) following cerebral infarction (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a care plan for proper safety precautions for one (1) of two (2) sampled Residents (Resident 1) by failing to identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks which included behavior of kicking his legs while in bed. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 1 sliding off from the bed on 3/24/2026 and potential for further falls which could cause injury and harm to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hemiplegia (a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a mild loss of strength in a leg, arm, or face) following cerebral infarction (a damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area) affecting right dominant side, hydrocephalus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to change the enteral (nutrition taken through the mouth or through a tube that goes directly to the stomach or small intestine) feeding bag every shift/every 24 hours for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) in accordance with the physician 's order and facility policy.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 not to get adequate nutrients via enteral feeding which could lead to malnutrition (serious condition that occurs when a resident's diet does not contain the right amount of nutrients) and results in hospitalization and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), encounter for attention to gastrostomy (a surgically created opening from the abdomen to the stomach for feeding or medication.) and adult failure to thrive (not a specific disease, for inadequate physical growth or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete/and follow through with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR; a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4) under the PASARR care area by not: Completing a PASARR level 1 screening for Resident 3 upon admission on [DATE]. 2. Conducting a follow up to obtain a PASARR level II (a resident-centered evaluation that is completed for anyone identified by the Level 1 Screening as having, or suspected of having, a PASRR condition, such as serious mental illness [SMI], intellectual disability [ID], developmental disability (DD), or related condition [RC]) evaluation for Resident 4 in accordance with the facility policy. This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling pas practiced and was provided in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure an open bag with eight (8) chicken patties and a cheesecake in the kitchen's walk-in freezer was labeled with open date and best by (expiration) date. The deficient practice of failing to ensure unlabeled foods are disposed accordingly had the potential to result in growth of bacteria and transmission of foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea (the frequent passing of loose, watery stools), and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization.Findings:During a concurrent observation in the facility kitchen and interview on 9/29/2025 at 7:47 AM with the Dietary Supervisor 1 (DS 1), walk-in freezer was observed. There were eight (8) chicken patties in an open bag, with no label of open date, expiration date, and no best by date. In addition, there was a cheesecake with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for food brought by family/visitors for five of seven sampled residents (Residents 4, 9, 25, 37 and 32) by failing to ensure:1. A container of rice and noodles for Resident 4 was labeled with use by date.2. Food was removed and discarded from the resident's refrigerator for Resident 9 who was discharged from the facility on 9/26/2025.3. A container of pozole (a kind of soup) and bag of cabbage for Resident 25 was labeled with use by date.4. A box of pizza for Resident 37, dated 9/6/2025 was disposed. 5. Multiple containers of food containing rice fish, bitter melon and beef for Resident 32 was labeled with use by date.6. Food brought by Resident 32's visitor was not left in resident's room for more than 2 hours. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (food poisoning) for Residents 4, 9, 25, 37 and 32, with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control policies & procedures for five (5) of six (6) sampled residents (Residents 10, 18, 40, 61, and 77) by not ensuring:1-4. The availability of environmental Protection Agency (EPA; a United States federal agency that protects human health and safeguards the environment by creating and enforcing environment laws and regulations) registered sanitizing wipes or bleach wipes effective against Clostridium Difficile (C. diff; a highly contagious bacterial infection that causes an infection of the colon [the longest part of the long intestine]) for Residents 10, 18, 61 and 77 on contact isolation (a transmission based precautions to stop germs from spreading through direct touch with a patient or indirect touch with contaminated objects in their environment) for C. diff infection. 5. Used disposable tray, disposable food containers and disposable utensils (single use eating tools, such as forks, knives, and spoons,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 49) under the Dignity Care Area, when Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) was observed standing above Resident 49's eye level while assisting the resident during mealtime. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 49's self-esteem and self-worth.During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase (a difficulty in the first stage of swallowing, where food is transferred from the mouth to the esophagus [muscular tube that connects the throat to the stomach]). During a review of Resident 49'S Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 11/5/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents 6, 10 and 43) had their call light (a signaling device, typically a button, used by patients or residents in a healthcare setting to request assistance from staff) placed within reach under the Environment care area. This failure resulted in Residents 6, 10 and 43 not being able to call for help when they were attempting to reach for their call lights and placed them at risk for experiencing a delay in receiving assistance from facility staff which could have potentially led to a fall or accident. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Colles' Fracture (a break in the distal radius [the larger of the two bones in the forearm] near the write, most often caused by a fall onto an outstretched hand) of right radius and osteoarthritis (a degenerative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 75 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0571 — isolatedLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a charge against one (1) of 24 sampled residents (Resident 79) personal funds was not imposed during the resident's stay at the facility from 4/3/2025 to 6/14/2025. This deficient practice had a potential to result in emotional distress brought about by a financial loss due to Resident 79 not receiving the required reimbursement from the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by a chemical imbalance in the body) and sepsis (a life threatening medical emergency where the body has an overwhelming and extreme inflammatory [body's response to infection] response to an infection which can cause damage to its own tissues and organs). During a review of Resident 79'S Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 4/9/2025, the MDS indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for one (1) of 24 sampled residents (Resident 25) by failing to ensure that Resident 25's room has no pool of water beside the resident's bed and the resident's electric fan by the resident's room was not dusty. These deficient practices caused an unsanitary environment and had potential for Resident 25 to be placed at risk for infection and injuryFindings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body), and paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs). During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss mattress (LAL mattress, designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer [localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue caused by prolonged pressure]) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 38) under pressure ulcer care area was set at the correct settings in accordance with the resident's weight. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident to develop new pressure injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 38 on 10/11/2024. Resident 38's diagnoses included pressure ulcer of unspecified site , lack of coordination, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when there is a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel). During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 10/17/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 38 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on toileting and needed substantial /maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the environment for potential hazard for one of two sample residents (Resident 12) under accidents care area by failing to ensure the floor was dry. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 12 to sustain injury in an event of a fall due to the wet floor. Findings:During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD, is a chronic condition characterized by excessive, persistent worry about everyday things that is difficult to control). During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 8/15/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 12's cognitive (ability to think and reason) skills for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body) care and services by failing to assess the resident's left upper arm dialysis access site (surgical or medical creations that allow for blood to be cleaned by a dialysis machine and returned to the body) on 11/11/2025, 11/12/2025, and 11/18/2025 for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25) under dialysis care area, in accordance with the facility policy and physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for complications such as bleeding or infection on Resident 25's left upper arm arteriovenous (AV) fistula (shunt, a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein, most commonly in the arm, that provides access for hemodialysis when kidneys fail) dialysis access. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 17), under food care area, was provided with a meal tray that did not contain a food the resident was allergic to. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 17 experiencing an allergic reaction such as anaphylaxis (a severe, whole-body allergic reaction that happens quickly and is life-threatening).Findings:During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of morbid (severe) obesity (a chronic condition characterized by an excessive accumulation of body fat that poses a risk to health) due to excess calories (the energy content of food and drink) and lack of coordination (the inability to control and organize the movement of different parts of the body, resulting in movements that are awkward, unsteady and clumsy). Resident 17's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse (disposable material, which includes both recyclable and non-recyclable material) from the kitchen properly when the designated green kitchen dumpster (a movable waste container designed to be brought and taken away by a special collection vehicle) was observed overfilled with a lid covering it halfway. This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and spread of vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, or that carry diseases, e.g., rodent's parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially infiltrate the facility, affect the resident care areas and pose a threat to residents of the facility.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/2025 at 10:49 AM with dietary aide 1 (DA 1), a kitchen green dumpster was observed at the back of the facility. The kitchen green dumpster was observed to be overflowing, and the dumpster lid cover was halfway open. DA 1 stated the dumpster's lid was not and should be closed. DA 1 stated, The dumpster is full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine drainage has an air gap (a vertical, unobstructed space between the ice machine's drain and the building's drainage system that prevents contaminated drain water from flowing back into the machine's clean water supply. It is a safety feature, often a simple pipe fitting or a dedicated device, that acts as a barrier, with the most common requirement being a 1-2 inch gap to comply with health and plumbing codes) to ensure no contact with outside contaminated (unfit for use, or unsafe) source as indicated in facility's policy and procedures (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential to result in backflow of contaminated water back to the ice machine and had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness ([food poisoning] with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food service area was maintained clean, sanitary, and in a functional manner while providing proper food handling in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure:1. Walk in freezer's temperature was checked on 8/4/2025 and 8/5/2025, Walk in refrigerator's (Refrigerator 1) temperature was checked on 8/4/2025 and 8/5/2025 and Standing refrigerator's (Refrigerator 2) temperature was checked on 8/2/2025, 8/3/2025, 8/4/2025 and 8/5/2025.2. Dishwasher machine's top surface was clean, without dust and crumbs. 3. [NAME] crispies were disposed after 6/30/2025 as labeled in the use by date sticker and flour with prepared date of 6/14/2025 was labeled with correct use by date.4. The dry food storage room's temperature was checked daily from 7/20/2025 to 8/5/2025. 5. 208 nutritional supplement drinks (designed to help individuals gain or maintain weight and used as meal replacements) were not stored in a room with temperature of 90 Fahrenheit (F, unit of measurement). 6. 52…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to readmit one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) back to the facility on 5/17/2025 after Resident 1 was discharged from General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) back to the facility in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Bed Holds and Returns. This deficient practice had the potential to violate the rights of Resident 1 and lengthen unnecessary stay in GACH. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that including but not limit to spondylosis (gradual breakdown of the spine and related structures), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), depression (a common mental health condition characterized by a persistent low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in activities, and other symptoms that can significantly interfere with daily life) and borderline personality disorder (a personality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship to reduce inappropriate antibiotic (medication used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) use by not administering antibiotic drug if the antibiotic drug use criteria (McGeer criteria, a set of standardized definitions used to identify healthcare-associated infections in long-term care facilities for surveillance, tracking outbreaks, and making informed decisions about antibiotic use) was not met for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 1 and 2 to develop antibiotic resistance (when bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites no longer respond to antimicrobial medicine and become ineffective making infections difficult or impossible to treat increasing the risk of disease spread, severe illness, disability, and death) and suffer adverse side effects from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: 1. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility employed a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) with specialized training. This failure had the potential to result in the prevention and control of infections among the residents and staff. Findings: During an interview on 5/6/2025 at 3:55 PM with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), RN 1 stated the facility had been without a designated IP for almost a month now. RN 1 stated RN 1 and the licensed nurses were covering the IP position. RN 1 stated RN 1 and licensed nurses were doing the IP job duties such as antibiotic stewardship for the residents. During an interview on 5/7/2025 at 5:20 PM with RN 1, RN 1 stated the staff covering the IP position did not and should have an IP certification. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/7/2025 at 5:35 PM with Medical Records (MR) of the previous IP nurse's Notice to Employee as to Change in Relationship, MR stated the previous IP's last day worked was on 2/6/2025. During a record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to State Survey Agency (SA, where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities), ombudsman (OMB) (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes and assisted living facilities) and local law enforcement within the two (2) hour time frame and thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse (intentional act causing injury or trauma to another person or animal by way of bodily contact) of one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) that happened on 2/17/2025 [NAME] accordance with the facility policy. This failure may result in psychosocial harm (pertaining to the influence of social factors on an individual's mind or behavior, and to the interrelation of behavioral and social factors) to Resident 1 such as experiencing fear retaliation (an unpleasant emotion or thought that you have when you are frightened or worried by something dangerous, painful, or bad that is happening) and/ or anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse (any act of sexual contact that a person suffers, submits to, participates in, or performs as a result of force or violence, threats, fear, or deception or without having legally consented to the act) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) within 2-hour timeframe to the State Survey Agency (SA, where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) and the state ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes and assisted living facilities), in accordance with the facility's abuse policy. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise or impede the protection of Resident 1 from further abuse, which could result in emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylosis (gradual breakdown of the spine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the food preferences for one (1) of two (2) sampled resident's (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Food Preferences and as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 1 to feel disrespected and to feel stomach discomfort. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylosis (gradual breakdown of the spine and related structures), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), depression (a common mental health condition characterized by a persistent low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in activities, and other symptoms that can significantly interfere with daily life) and borderline personality disorder (a personality disorder characterized by severe mood swings,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance to prevent accidents for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident 1). On 4/24/2024, Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) assisted Resident 1 back to bed from the resident's wheelchair without assistance of another facility staff. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having an assisted fall with CNA 2 and placed resident at risk of injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerotic (a buildup of fats, cholesterol [waxy, fat-like substance found in the blood and cells] and other substances in and on the artery [a blood vessel that carries blood away from the heart and to the body's tissue and organs] walls) heart disease (a group of conditions that affect the heart and blood vessels) and intracranial injury (also known as traumatic brain injury [TBI] is a brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 2) received food that accommodated resident intolerances and preferences. This failure placed Resident 2 at risk for experiencing feelings of sadness and distress and had the potential to result in Resident 2 having decreased meal intake which would lead to weight loss and malnutrition (a state of nutritional deficiency or imbalance that occurs when the body does not receive or absorb sufficient nutrients [calories, protein, vitamins, minerals] to maintain health and function properly). Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of spondylosis (a condition in which there is abnormal wear on the cartilage [a touch, flexible tissue that lines joints and gives structure to parts of the body] and bones of the neck [cervical vertebrae]) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) were not used unnecessarily for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) by failing to: 1. Document specific indications for Resident 1's targeted behavior of kicking the bed and pulling the gastrostomy tube (g-tube- a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feeding to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) for the use of quetiapine (Seroquel-an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness and social interactions] and lorazepam (Ativan-an anti-anxiety [characterized by feelings of worry, apprehension, or nervousness, often accompanied by physical symptoms like increased heart rate or sweating] medication) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an accident by failing to monitor one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) for constant kicking of leg when severely anxious or agitated in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for fracture on the foot and had the potential to result in reoccurring foot injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a document that compiles a resident's information, including name, address, date of birth , insurance details, and emergency contacts as well as medical history, allergies and current medications), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture (break in the bone) of metatarsal bones (one or more of the five long bones that connect the ankle to the toes) left foot, Alzheimer's disease unspecified (a disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the facility's consultant pharmacist's recommendation for the use of lorazepam (Ativan-an anti-anxiety [characterized by feelings of worry, apprehension, or nervousness, often accompanied by physical symptoms like increased heart rate or sweating] medication) and quetiapine (Seroquel-a psychoactive medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness and social interactions], bipolar disorder [a mental health condition characterized by extreme shifts in mood ranging from intense highs to periods of intense lows], and depression [low mood, fatigue, and hopelessness]) in the Drug Regimen Review (DRR- a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing consequences and potential risks associated with medication) was communicated to the physician for one of two sampled residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) management for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3), by failing to ensure the Low Air Loss mattresses (LAL- a type of mattress used for residents who are at risk of developing pressure sores or already have pressure sores) were at the correct weight settings for the residents. This failure resulted in inadequate therapy from the LAL mattresses, with the potential to worsen Resident 2 and 3's current pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. During a review Resident 2's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of sacral region (the area of the lower back, specifically encompassing the sacrum [triangular bone formed at the base of the spine]), unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of one resident (Resident 1), who was observed with unexplained swelling (a raised/ enlarged, curved shape on the surface of your body which appears as a result of an injury or an illness) on the resident's right hand on 1/26/2025. This failure compromised Resident 1's safety and well-being by delaying appropriate medical evaluation and intervention. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow imprecise movement), and ataxia (a neurological condition that affects coordination, balance, and movement. It is caused by damage to the cerebellum, the part of the brain that controls these functions). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and update the Care Plan (CP- a tool that helps nurses and other care team members organize aspects of patient care according to a timeline, and allows them to think critically and holistically in a way that supports the patient's physical, psychological, social, and spiritual care) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1), who had a fall incident on 2/11/2025. This failure resulted in a lack of new fall prevention interventions, placing Resident 1 at risk for another fall incident and/ or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow imprecise movement), and ataxia (a neurological condition that affects coordination, balance, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice (guidelines that outline the expectations and requirements for professionals) to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being (highest possible level of functioning and well- being) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Notify and coordinate with Resident 1's primary physician regarding Resident 1's neurologist ([NAME] -a medical doctor who is an expert in diagnosing and treating diseases and conditions of the brain, spinal cord, and nerves) order to continue Resident 1's lacosamide medication (Vimpat - a medication used to manage and control partial seizures [brief episodes of abnormal brain activity that can cause involuntary movements, loss of consciousness, or other symptoms]) on 11/5/2024. The facility did not notify [NAME] about Resident 1's lacosamide was stopped on 11/2/2024. 2. Notify and coordinate with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the menu and did not meet nutritional needs for 63 of 67 sampled residents on regular (diet with no restriction) and therapeutic diets (diet that controls certain food and nutrients) when [NAME] 1 did not follow the recipe for sauce and Cajun country rice. This failure had the potential to result in decrease food and nutrient intake resulting in unintended (not done on purpose) weight loss and increase blood pressure. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s recipe titled Recipe: Cajun Country Rice, dated 10/25/2024, the recipe indicated, Ingredients: margarine, onions, celery, green or red pepper, thyme and cayenne. During a review of the facility ' s recipe titled Recipe: Fish with Tarragon Sauce dated 10/25/2024, the recipe indicated, Sauce ingredients: margarine, onions, tarragon, salt, low sodium chicken broth, corn starch in water. During a review of the facility ' s daily cook ' s spreadsheet (a list containing types and amount of foods of what each diet type would receive) titled Winter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved flavor and appearance for breakfast when: Cook 1 did not follow the recipes for a. for tarragon sauce resulting to salty food product. b. Cajun rice affecting the flavors. These failures had a potential to result in 63 of 67 (including Resident 1 and Resident 2) unplanned weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 6/12/2023 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (when space inside the backbone is too small), muscle wasting (thinning) and atrophy (loss of muscles) and chronic kidney disease (when the kidney becomes damaged overtime) During a review of Resident 2 ' s Physician Order Sheet, dated 6/12/2023, the Physician Order Sheet indicated a physician ' s order for regular diet (a diet with no restriction). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1. Refrigerator racks had chips. 2. Three (3) plain Greek yogurts, two (2) low fat yogurts, 2 cottage cheeses, and 3 low fat cottage cheese passed their expiration date in the walk-in refrigerator. 3. Four (4) dented (a hollow made by a blow or by pressure) cans were stored along with non-dented cans. 4. [NAME] 1 did not wash his hands after wiping the food preparation sink and then immediately returned to work and touched the scoops for lunch trayline ' s (an area where foods were assembled on the trays), use. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacterial growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or chemicals) in 63 of 67 medically compromised residents who received food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for two (2) out of the four (4) sampled residents (Resident 1 and 4) by: 1. Failing to monitor Resident 1 at least every two (2) hours and as needed in accordance with the resident's care plan for Resident noted of picking up things quickly and hides it. On 1/3/2025, Resident 1 was observed with a ring (not the resident's ring) on the resident's left hand's middle finger. This deficient practice has resulted in Resident 1 's left hand middle finger to get swollen and appeared to have pus (a thick, usually yellowish-white, fluid matter that is formed as part of an inflammatory response typically associated with an infection) due to the ring that does not fit the resident and staff was not able to remove. Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on 1/3/2025 and received intravenous (IV- way of giving the drug or substance through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) antibiotics (medicine that fight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call pad/ call light (a device used by residents to call staff) was within reach for four of 17 sampled residents (Residents 6, 20, 171, and 34) in accordance with the facility policy. This failure had the potential for Residents 6, 20, 171, and 34 not to be able to call for help or assistance which could result to delay in the delivery of care and services, especially during an emergency, which could lead to illness and harm to the residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 on 11/13/2023 with diagnoses which included hyperlipidemia (an excess of lipids or fats in your blood), anemia (when you have low levels of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout your body), muscle atrophy (wasting or thinning of muscle mass). During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post precautionary and safety sign indicating use of oxygen (therapy a treatment that provides extra oxygen for people to breathe in) for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 120 and 121) as indicated in the facility's oxygen administration policy. This deficient practice could potentially place Residents 120 and 121 at risk for injury and serious harm. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 120's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy (brain activity that cause sudden uncontrollable electrical disturbance in the brain and sometimes loss of awareness) and asthma ( a chronic lung disease caused by narrowing and swelling of the airways in the lungs that makes it difficult to breathe). During a review of Resident 120's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. Food containers were completely sealed and intact. 2. A can opener was clean and free of gunk (unpleasantly sticky or messy substance) and rust (a reddish-brown substance that forms on the surface of iron and steel as a result of reacting with air and water) 3. Resident 16's breakfast tray was replaced with a clean tray and plate prior to being delivered back to the resident. 4. The kitchen trashcan was not overflowing and was not touching the rack of clean plate cover. 5. The dietary aid (DA1) did not use a dirty potholder while preparing food on 10/30/2024. These deficient practices have the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures as indicated on the facility policy and procedure (P&P) when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) and LVN 3 donned (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) prior to entering Resident 26's room, which was an enhanced barrier precautions room (EBP; gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents who are at increased risk of multidrug-resistant organism [MDRO; a microorganism that is resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and antifungals] acquisition or who are known to be colonized [when one has the germs on or in their body but does not have symptoms of an infection] or infected with an MDRO). 2. Ensure CNA 2 wore gloves when handling a plastic bag full of dirty linen after changing Resident 26. 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect for one (1) of one sampled resident (Resident 20). The facility staff was observed standing over the resident while assisting the resident during a meal. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 20's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 20 on 8/10/2024 with the diagnoses that included lack of coordination, hyperlipidemia (excess of lipids or fats in your blood), chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should). During a review of Resident 20's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 8/23/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 20 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/7/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 20 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Advance Health Care Directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them) was readily retrievable by any facility staff for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 53). This failure had the potential to result in nursing staff not knowing if Residents 53 had specific resident wishes to follow in case of an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 53 on 10/22/2023 with diagnoses which include hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), Parkinson (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance), dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary muscle movements ranging from shakes, tics, and tremors to full-body movements) During a review of Resident 53's History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse (a range of words or behaviors use to manipulate, intimidate, and maintain power and control over someone) by staff for one (1) of 17 sampled residents (Resident 123) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) used inappropriate language with Resident 123. This failure resulted in Resident 123 experiencing feelings of disappointment in the facility staff caring for her and had the potential to result in mental and emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 123's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of spondylosis (a condition in which there is abnormal wear on the cartilage [a touch, flexible tissue that lines joints and gives structure to parts of the body] and bones of the neck [cervical vertebrae]) and anxiety disorder (a condition that causes excessive feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 12) was provided assistance while eating as indicated in the care plan and facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential for decline and not to maximize Resident 12's functional ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL, basic tasks that people need to do to live independently) which can affect the resident's physical and mental wellbeing. This failure also had the potential not to meet Resident 12's nutritional needs which could lead to further malnutrition (a condition that occurs when a person's body doesn't get the right amount of nutrients it needs to function properly) and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild protein calorie malnutrition and adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) regarding respiratory infection control for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident 220) by not ensuring Resident 220's nebulizer (an electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it could be breathed directly into the lungs through a face mask) tubing was stored in a plastic bag with a label indicating the date the tubing was changed and name of the resident. This failure had the potential to put Resident 220 at risk for infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 220's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that occurs when the upper chambers of the heart, called the atria, beat rapidly and out of sync) and pleural effusion (a condition where fluid builds up in the pleural space, the thin cavity between the lung and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to one of two sampled residents (Resident 172) who is on hemodialysis (dialysis, a process of filtering the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally) by failing to ensure: 1. A dialysis emergency kit (dialysis e-kit, kit that contains emergency supplies that will be needed in case dialysis site got dislodged and/ or is bleeding) accessible at Resident 172 bedside. 2. A warning signage visible to warn facility staff not to use Resident 172's left arm for blood pressure (BP, pressure of blood on the wall your arteries as your heart pumps blood around your body) check, laboratory test/ blood draw, and no finger stick (pricking the skin of a finger to obtain blood usually done during blood sugar check). This failure may result in the inability to manage/ control the bleeding from hemodialysis access site and increases the risk of accidental use of Resident 172's left arm that can cause bleeding and damage to Resident 172's arteriovenous shunt (AV, a connection that's made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest (a general term for organisms which may cause illnesses) control program in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure the facility was free from ants. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to get sick if the residents consume food that were contaminated by ants. Findings: During an observation on 10/29/2024 at 11:43 AM, more than 10 black ants were crawling along the door frames of Resident 3 and Resident 18. During an observation on 10/29/2024 at 4:10 PM, more than 10 black ants were crawling on Resident 3 and Resident 18 door frame. During observation on 10/30/2024 at 9:31 AM, two black ants were crawling along the door frame of Resident 3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/31/2024 at 4:24 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3), CNA 3 stated there were three (3) ants crawling along Resident 28's doorway. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/31/2024 at 4:30 PM, with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician visited residents at least once every thirty days for the first ninety days after admission, and at least once every sixty days thereafter for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 & 4). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the residents' quality of care and delay of treatment. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle shrinking), polyneuropathy (damage or disease affecting multiple nerves of the body, causing weakness, numbness, and burning pain), and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 8/5/2024, the record indicated Resident 1's cognitive (mental action or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments and services to minimize decline in mobility and joint range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had limited range of motion and functional mobility when the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's Restorative nursing aide (RNA) program (nursing aide program to help residents maintain their function and joint mobility) treatments were not delayed after the discontinuation of physical therapy services (PT, a rehabilitation profession that restores, maintains, and promotes optimal physical function). This failure had the potential to cause further decline in Resident 1's range of motion, functional mobility, and ability to participate in activities of daily living. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet dated 9/25/24, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including, but not limited to lumbago (back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control when facility failed to ensure they have process in place and followed by facility staff on how to properly disinfect cloth gait belts (safety device worn around the waist that can be used help safely transfer a person from one surface to another) after each resident use. This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infections among residents and staff. Findings: During an observation on 9/25/24 at 11:32 AM, Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA 1) was walking with a resident down the hallway with a walker. The resident had a cloth gait belt around the waist. During an interview on 9/25/24 at 12:05 PM, the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) stated, all therapy and RNA staff used cloth gait belts when working with residents. DOR stated staff used disinfectant wipes to wipe the cloth gait belts after each resident use. DOR stated cloth gait belts were a porous surface. DOR stated staff did not launder the cloth gait belts in between resident use and used the cloth gait…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate an individualized resident-centered care plan (a care plan that prioritizes the unique health needs and desired outcomes of the resident)for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Residents 1) to address the resident's need to have abduction pillow (stabilizes the legs and helps maintain proper leg positioning while recovering after surgery) in between his bilateral legs to prevent hip dislocation (medical emergency that occurs when the head of the thighbone separates from the hip socket) after a surgery. Resident 1 was observed not wearing the abduction pillow in between his bilateral legs on 9/23/2024. This deficient practice has the potential to result to Resident 1's delay in recovery and/ or having complication after a surgery. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the use of an abduction pillow (stabilizes the legs and helps maintain proper leg positioning while recovering after surgery) for one of two residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 underwent a right hip hemiarthroplasty on 9/1/2024 (a surgical procedure that replaces the femoral head of the hip with a prosthetic component) due to a left hip fracture (a partial or complete break in the upper part of the thigh bone [femur] where it meets the pelvic bone) This deficient practice had the potential to result in right hip dislocation (an injury in which the hipbone is moved out of place) to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included a right hip hemiarthroplasty (a surgical procedure that replaces the femoral head of the hip with a prosthetic component),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document monitoring for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1), for 72 hours after an alleged abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for unmonitored mental, emotional changes that could negatively impact Resident 1 ' s well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily functioning/life), muscle wasting (deterioration of muscle tissue) and atrophy (decrease in size of an organ or tissue) and major depressive disorder (MDD - a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) with psychotic features (delusions and hallucinations) . During a review of Resident 1 ' s History & Physical (H&P), dated 1/26/2024, the H&P indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (one of the major communication technologies that link nursing home staff to the needs of residents) was accessible and addressed in a timely manner for four of six residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in care and services for Resident 2,3,4 and 5. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 3/24/2024 with diagnosis which include muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 2 ' s care plan for at risk for an unavoidable fall, future fall, or injury, dated 3/24/2024 indicated interventions that included call light or alternative call light within resident reach (close enough to be touched). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 6/19/2024, indicated Resident 2 had severely impaired with cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents 1) was provided privacy during perineal care (the practice of washing the genital and rectal areas of the body). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 ' s feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: Druing a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/5/2024 with diagnosis which include dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), history of falling. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 7/11/2024, indicated Resident 1 ' s cognition was intact (processes of thinking and reasoning skills) for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was partial /moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) on oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 - a highly contagious infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]) infection control according to the facility ' s policy and procedure. 1. The facility failed to ensure a COVID-19 designated room had appropriate signage indicating droplet isolation (measures to prevent transmission when infection can be spread to others by speaking, sneezing, or coughing) 2. Facility staff did not wear all required personal protective equipment (PPE - worn to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) while assisting Resident 2 who was COVID-19 positive. 3. There were no face shields (aims to protect the wearer's entire face) readily available in Resident 2 ' s isolation cart (store and transport your facility's personal protective equipment). 4. Ensure Resident 2 ' s door remained closed according to the facility ' s policy and procedure. These failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the diet order for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) in accordance with their policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 not to receive his nutritional requirements which can lead to medical complications. Findings: A review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) and hyperlipidemia (an elevated level of lipids - like cholesterol and triglycerides- in the blood). A review of Resident 2's History and Physical, dated 7/13/2024, indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a standardized care screening and assessment tool), dated 7/8/2024, indicated the resident is independent in cognitive (the functions your brain uses to think,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with its policy and procedure by: 1. Failed to ensure Resident 1's corn bread muffin was free from non-edible item such as wire (unknown what type of wire) on 5/16/2024. 2. Failed to ensure Resident 1's cup, bowls, and forks were free from residue. These deficient practices had the potential to result in residents developing foodborne illness and injury which can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) disorder and spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of the back). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a standardized care screening and assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) indwelling urinary catheter (tube that drains urine from the bladder into a drainage bag) was changed monthly as indicated in the physician's order. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 experiencing extreme pain when the indwelling catheter was changed on 3/15/24, five and half months after an order to change monthly was placed. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty) with lower urinary tract symptoms (include voiding obstructive symptoms such as hesitance, poor and/or intermittent stream, straining, feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, dribbling, and storage or irritative symptoms such as frequency, urgency, urge incontinence [inability to control], and nocturia [waking up at night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the medical doctor (MD) per physician ' s order after a change in condition for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1): 1 Licensed nurses did not notify the MD regarding Resident 1 ' s blood sugar (sugar located in the blood) below 120. 2. Licensed nurses did not notify the MD regarding Resident 1 not requiring medication administration of Humalog insulin (a medication that regulates the amount of sugar in the blood) for blood sugar below 120. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s MD not being notified of Resident 1 ' s blood sugar below 120 and not requiring insulin, which had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1 ' s treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2 - condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), multiple sclerosis (MS – disease of the brain and spinal cord…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to withhold Humalog insulin (a medication that regulates the amount of sugar in the blood) doses as indicated on the physician ' s order for blood sugar levels (amount of sugar in the blood) less than 120 for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to become hypoglycemic (abnormally low levels of sugar in the blood) possibly leading to loss of consciousness (state of being awake, aware of and responding to one's surroundings) and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2 - condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), multiple sclerosis (MS – disease of the brain and spinal cord that causes the nerves to deteriorate or become permanently damaged, characterized by generalized muscle weakness and muscle wasting), bacteremia (the presence of bacteria…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) recommendation to obtain a PASRR level II evaluation (a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate state-designated authority and determines whether the individual has mental illness, intellectual disability, or a related condition, determines the appropriate setting for the individual and recommends what, if any, specialized services and/or rehabilitative services the individual needs) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 22). This failure had the potential to result in Residents 1 and 22 not receiving the appropriate care, treatment, and services for their needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident 57's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/18/2023 with diagnoses that included fracture (break in the bone) of left femur (uppermost part of thighbone) and atherosclerosis of aorta (fat and calcium has built up in the inside wall of a large blood vessel). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 8/22/2023, indicate Resident 57 had moderate cognitive impairment (ability to think and reason). A review of the undated History and Physical Examination indicated Resident 57 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A record review of Physician Order Sheet for October 2023, indicated Resident 57 was ordered oxygen (O2) at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for hypoxemia (low oxygen that need supplemental oxygen administered). During an observation on 10/23/2023 at 9:37 AM in Resident 57's room, Resident 57 was lying in bed with the head of bed slightly elevated. Resident 57 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement treatment for the prevention of pressure ulcer (painful wound caused as a result of pressure or friction) for three (3) of three sampled Residents (Resident 25, 27 and 22) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. and 2. The low air loss mattress (LAL, mattress used for residents who are at risk for developing sores or already have pressure ulcer designed to circulate a constant flow of air for the management of pressure sores) was on the correct settings for Residents 25 and 27. 3. Heel protectors were applied to Resident 22's bilateral heels as indicated on the Physician orders. These deficient practices have the potential to place the residents at risk for skin integrity complications and pressure injury. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE]. with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental, or extra oxygen) and necessary respiratory care services for four (4) of 4 sampled residents (Resident 5, 7, 30, and 48) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Resident 5's oxygen tubing (a tubing that connects to the oxygen source used to deliver oxygen) connected to the oxygen humidifier (a device designed to increase the moisture in the air) was kinked from the top of the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that gives extra oxygen by taking and filtering air from the surroundings) and the end of nasal cannula tubing was disconnected from the oxygen humidifier. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) which could lead to serious injury or death. 2. Resident 30's oxygen humidifier jar was empty and did not have sterile water (water that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe provision of pharmaceutical services by failing to store received medications in the medication room as indicated on the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse reaction if these improper stored medications were administered to the residents. Findings: During an observation in Medication Storage Room on 10/25/2023 at 4:12 PM, with Licensed Vocational (LVN)7, the following were observed: 1. There were two medications: Humulin R (used to help manage blood sugar levels on adults with diabetes [high blood sugar level]) 100 units (unit of measure) vial delivered on 10/25/2023, and Latanoprost (treats high pressure inside the eye) 0.005% eye drops delivered on 10/24/2023, were placed inside a plastic bag with a melted, room temperature ice pack that was placed inside the medication box with other medications inside the bubble packs placed on top of the counter. 2. Medication Refrigerator have an ice built up in the freezer. During an interview with LVN 7 on 10/25/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Properly label foods and remove expired food items in the resident refrigerator, kitchen refrigerator, kitchen freezer and dry goods storage 2. Record refrigerator temperatures for the resident's communal refrigerator These failures had the potential to expose the residents to a food borne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation in the kitchen and interview on 10/23/23 at 8:43 AM with Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), DSS stated a carton of soy milk in the refrigerator did not have a label indicating the opened date. DSS stated that it needed to be labeled with the date when it was opened because if the residents drink old milk, they can get sick. During a concurrent observation in the kitchen walk-in freezer and interview on 10/23/23 at 8:56 AM with DSS, a full tray of bacon was inside a partially uncovered metal container. DSS stated that it was supposed to be covered and that if it is left uncovered it could potentially contaminate other foods. During an observation in the dry goods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the lids to the trash dumpster were fully closed and trash was disposed of properly. This failure had the potential to lead to an infestation (the presence of an unusually large number of insects or animals) that could enter the facility and spread diseases to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 10/25/23 at 12:17 PM at the back of the facility grounds, there were two trash dumpster bins partially open with many bags of trash visible underneath the lids. Two lids were observed on one dumpster container. There was a bag of garbage resting in between both lids obstructing any possibility of closing. Small pieces of garbage were also seen on the floor near the dumpster bins. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23 at 12:18 PM near the trash dumpster area, housekeeper (HK) was observed placing a clear bag of garbage next to the dumpster bin on the ground. HK stated that they did not place it in the bin because it was already full. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 2:20 PM with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in the healthcare setting) were followed in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Resident 5's oxygen humidifier (a device designed to increase the moisture in the air) was found sitting on the floor. 2. The facility staff failed to wear gloves while handling soiled re-usable gowns. 3. The facility failed to restock Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, is specialized clothing or equipment worn by an employee for protection against infectious materials, such as gowns, gloves, masks, and goggles) Cart of two Enhanced Standard Precaution (infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO, bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic] in nursing homes which involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 22 sampled residents (Resident 3 and 30) were informed of the risks and benefits of psychoactive medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior). 1. Resident 30 was not provided a psychoactive medication consent form for the use of Lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety). 2. Resident 3 was not provided a psychoactive medication consent form for the use of Lorazepam, divalproex (a medication used to treat bipolar disorder), and Quetiapine (a medication used to treat bipolar disorder). These deficient practices resulted in Resident 30 and Resident 3 not being informed of their care and making an uninformed decision regarding the use of psychoactive medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a significant weight loss (loss of more than five [5] percent of usual body weight over six [6] to 12 months) for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 366). This failure had the potential to result in the decline of the resident's health due to delays in interventions to prevent further weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 366's admission Record Face Sheet dated 10/9/2023, the admission Record Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - a digestive disease in which stomach acid or contents irritates the food pipe lining), and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decision that interferes with doing everyday activities). During a review of Resident 366's History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/3/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 366 does not have the mental capacity to make medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for two (2) of 22 sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 167). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 35's admission Record indicated the Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and trigeminal neuralgia (a type of nerve pain that affects the facial area). A review of the History and Physical Examination dated 9/23/2022, indicated Resident 35 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/2023, indicated Resident 35 usually made self-understood and understood others, and had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to make daily decision). The MDS indicated Resident 35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision while ambulating to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 24) based on the resident's care plans. This deficient practice has resulted to Resident 24 had an assisted fall (suddenly go down onto the ground or towards the ground unintentionally or accidentally) incident on 10/23/2023 which may lead to serious injury to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 24's admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted at the facility on 1/26/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) , lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal in your lower back that may cause pain or numbness in your legs) and osteoarthritis (a type of arthritis [inflammation or swelling of one or more joints] that only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 Residents (Resident 366) maintained ideal body weight by failing to inform the doctor of resident's change of condition resulting in significant weight loss (loss of more than 5 percent of usual body weight over 6 to 12 months). This failure has the potential to result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 366's physician progress note (from the hospital prior to admission) dated 10/2/2023, the Physician Progress Note indicated Resident 366's appetite ranged from poor to fair and refers to Resident 366 having anorexia (eating disorder that causes people to weigh less than considered healthy for their age and height, usually by excessive weight loss) due to not liking the food. A review of Resident 366's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and signed the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment - medical order form that informs medical staff what to do during a medical emergency and Resident is unable to speak for themselves) for one of one resident (Resident 366). This failure has the potential to result in psychological and physical harm if the resident's wishes during a medical emergency were not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 366's admission Record Face Sheet, the admission Record Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - a digestive disease in which stomach acid or contents irritates the food pipe lining), and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decision that interferes with doing everyday activities). During a review of Resident 366's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/3/23, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of residents as indicated on the facility policy by failing to: a. Ensure the Change of Shift Narcotics (drug that produces analgesia [pain relief], narcosis [state of stupor or sleep], and addiction [physical dependence on the drug]) Reconciliation Records contained two Licensed Nurses' signatures for one (1) of two (2) carts. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to the resident due to an inaccurate record of narcotic medication use, and the loss of accountability, which could affect the controls against drug loss, diversion (abuse of prescription drugs), or theft. b. Clean and dry affected area as instructed by the manufacture's instruction, prior to applying lidocaine patch (a medication used to treat pain) to Resident's breast for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to decreased absorption of medication, which could result to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor adverse side effects for one of five sampled residents (Resident 30) who was taking Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) 1 milligram (mg) and verify the order with the physician as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 30 to experience adverse side effects without adequate monitoring. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 30's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 30 had moderately impaired cognitive skills. The MDS also indicated Resident 30 required extensive assistance in bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. A review of Resident 30's Physician Order Sheet dated October 2023, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light (used in healthcare facilities as an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) was within reach for two out of 22 sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 7) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. These deficient practices had the potential not to meet the residents' needs and preference. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 29's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated, Resident 2's with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a condition that happens when your blood sugar [glucose] is too high), left hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) A review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 29 has moderately impaired cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent a fall (to move unintentionally or unexpectedly onto or toward the ground from a higher place) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and 7) by failing to ensure the residents' bed was kept in low bed position (bed closer to the ground). These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 suffering a fall on 9/29/23 and was transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH). It also placed Resident 7 at risk of falling from the bed on 10/3/23. Findings: A review of the facility's face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] at 4:30 p.m. to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), unspecified dementia (symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), Coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19, an infectious respiratory disease that is very contagious). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to comply with the resident's request to not interact with one of the facility staff. This deficient practice had resulted in Resident 1 feeling disrespected and angry, which had the potential to affect Resident 1's psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included Colon Cancer (a cancer of the large intestine, which may affect the colon or rectum), diabetes mellitus (a condition that happens when your blood sugar [glucose] is too high) and hypertension (high blood pressure) A review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/1/2023, indicated Resident 1 has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 7/19/2023, indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's staffing information was posted and placed in a visible and prominent area on 9/27/2025, 9/28/2025, and 9/29/2025 in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential for the residents and not to be informed of the actual number of nurses providing direct care to the residents. Findings: During an observation, on 9/29/2025 at 8:24 AM, staffing information, dated 9/26/2025, was posted in the hallway near the nursing station. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/2025 at 9:35 AM with Registered Nurse Supervisor 1 (RNS 1), the posted staffing information dated 9/26/2025 was reviewed. RNS 1 verified that the staffing information that was currently posted was dated 9/26/2025. RNS 1 stated the staffing information over the weekend and for today, 9/29/2025 were not posted. RNS 1 stated the staffing information that includes number of scheduled staff should be posted every day. During an interview on 10/1/2025 at 9:30 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-19 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 11 of 31 resident rooms (rooms 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 & 26) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a multiple resident room. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' personal space, decrease freedom of mobility and could compromise the provision of care.During the initial observation on 9/29/2025 from 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM, rooms 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate and/or move around in their wheelchairs freely. Nursing staff were observed to have enough space to provide safe quality care and there was enough space for beds, side tables, dressers and other medical equipment. During a review of the facility's Room Waiver, dated 9/29/2025, the facility's Room Waiver indicated the rooms with 3 beds are in accordance with the needs of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Staffing Report (Nurse Staffing Information) posted on 10/29/2024, 10/30/2024, and 11/1/2024 was accurate in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to reflect the correct total number and actual hours of unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care. This deficient practice had the potential to inaccurately reflect the actual nurses providing direct care to the residents. Findings: During a review of the Daily Staffing Report (Nurse Staffing Information), the Daily Staffing Report posted for 10/29/2024 indicated a census of 62 and a total number of 10 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for day shift, and five (5) CNAs for evening shift. The Daily Staffing Report also indicated three (3) Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNAs) for day shift. During a review of the Facility Staffing Assignment for 10/29/2024, the Facility Staffing Assignment indicated the facility had a total of nine (9) CNAs (as opposed to 10 CNAs listed on the Daily Staffing Report) for day shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,808 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,808 — penalty dated 2025-05-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEHMANN, KENNETH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 08/01/2025 |
| AHM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| AMC FAMILY HOLDING LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| AMM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| ASM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| ATR FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| ZM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| LEVINE, YCHAIL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| MAYER, AKIVA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| BAK, ABRAHAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| MONTAG, MEMPHIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| WYNSTOCK, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| MAYER, HELENE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2026 |
| MAYER, RONALD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2026 |
| ABAK CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| ABE AND RACHEL BAK FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| AM HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| FAIR OAKS PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| LIGHTHOUSE UNITED PARTNERS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| MAYER 2012 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| MAYER FAMILY 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| MCP 1 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| MFT 2020 TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 12, 2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
| MGAZ CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| BAK, RACHEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| GASTWIRTH, MENACHEM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| YUZ, ALEXANDER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055341. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.