No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunset Park Healthcare

2250 29th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90405 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 44 certified beds · (310) 450-7694 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (310) 450-7694 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2701 Ocean Park Blvd · (310) 452-3206 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2731 Ocean Park Blvd · (310) 452-5705 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2627 Lincoln Blvd · (310) 581-6450 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1810 Stewart St · (310) 458-8300 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.8%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.5%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table40.4%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication16.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.9%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.142.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.041.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.3%CMS range 28.6–55.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.2–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.0–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.281.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
30.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 41.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-25)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided 1:1 monitoring and supervision to prevent repeated falls for Resident 1 in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedures titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated, 3/2018. The facility identified Resident 1 as a high risk for falls. As a result, on 10/1/2023-Resident 1 fell out of his wheelchair (WC) while sitting in the lobby of the facility and suffered a laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) and bleeding above the right eyebrow. Resident 1 was transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) and treatment provided for the laceration. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission records (facesheet) indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-ongoing inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the rights of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to be free from financial abuse according to facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Gifts, Gratuities, and Payments, reviewed 3/2025, when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 over the course of three days, made several purchases including reserving a hotel room for LVN 1 and charged Resident 1's credit card during the month of 2/2026. Resident 1 did not authorize the purchases. As a result, Resident 1 was upset because LVN 1 charged $1213.02 to Resident 1's credit card without the resident's permission.Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/3/2025, with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots and increases the risk of stroke and other heart complications) and Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free of accident hazards by failing to:Ensure Resident 1 was assisted with at least two-person assist during mobility and transfer according to Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool).Ensure Resident 1 was evaluated and assessed by a licensed nurse after Resident 1 slipped on the floor while giving shower according to facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, , Falls - Clinical Protocol, and Falls and Fall Risk, Managing.This deficiency resulted in Resident 1's fall and had the potential to place the resident at risk for recurrent falls. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle), muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have call device (a mechanism used by residents to promptly communicate with staff) within reach for three of five sampled residents (Resident 2, 3 and 4). This failure had the potential to result in an accident and/or injury, and/or delay resident care.During a review Resident 2's admission Record dated 9/29/25 indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia (decline in abilities to remember, make judgments, think, or make decisions), abnormalities of gait and mobility, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities)During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/4/25 indicated Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit residents to receive visitors according to the facility ' s policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Visitation and Resident Rights, for one of four sampled residents, Resident 1. This deficient practice violated residents ' rights regarding visitation. Cross Reference F656. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including respiratory tuberculosis (a contagious bacterial infection that involves the lungs), pneumonia (lung infection that inflames air sacs with fluid or pus) and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – resident assessment tool) dated 3/23/2025, indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decisions were severely impaired. The MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CP) that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), regarding visitation rights and conflicts between Resident 1 ' s Family Member 1 and Resident 1 ' s Family Member 2 (FM 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on residents ' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including respiratory tuberculosis (a contagious bacterial infection that involves the lungs), pneumonia (lung infection that inflames air sacs with fluid or pus) and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – resident assessment tool) dated 3/23/2025, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 38) risk of entrapment. 2. Developed a CP for two of six sampled residents (Resident 36 and Resident 43)'s behavior. These deficient practices had the potential to result negative impact on residents' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: A. During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral infection or toxins in the blood), muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle) and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-25 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the resident's hearing at the highest attainable level and obtain the hearing aids timely for one of one sampled residents (Resident 15). This failure resulted in Resident 15 getting angry, not able to watch television (TV) every day, and having a hard time communicating with facility staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record indicated Resident 15, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (a condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin, or the cells don't respond properly to the insulin that is produced, leading to high blood sugar levels, hypertensive heart disease (the heart is damaged or not working properly due to long-term, uncontrolled high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 15's Order Summary Report dated 9/30/2024, indicated Resident 15 may have audiology (the branch of science and medicine concerned with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident receive appropriate treatment and services to increase, prevent, or maintain the range of motion (ROM- the extent of movement of a joint) and mobility for three of four sampled resident (Resident 11, Resident 43, Resident 37) according to the facility policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Resident Mobility and Range of Motion. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for further ROM decline and contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: A. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (loss of the ability to move in one side of the body) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space below one of the thin layers that cover and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and concurrent record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 25) in need of dental service. This failure had the potential to cause the Resident pain, discomfort, weight loss, and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing foods or liquids) and essential hypertension (a type of high blood pressure where the underlying cause is not clear or identifiable). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 3/4/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 25's cognitive (mental process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought and understanding) skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 25 was totally dependent on facility staff for activities of daily living (ADLs-basic self-care tasks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure [NAME] 2 followed its Recipe for Parika Beef for week 4 Saturday, when [NAME] 2 scooped Knorr Beef Bouillon with a spoon without ensuring the proper measurement. This deficient practice had the potential to result in ineffective nutritional value and elevated salt intake which could result in elevated blood pressure. Findings: During an observation in the kitchen and interview on 5/24/25 at 9:33 a.m., [NAME] 2 was observed preparing lunch, using a spoon to stir meat (beef). [NAME] 2 was then observed using the same spoon to scoop out powdered beef flavored bouillon from a container without measuring how much powder was in the spoon. [NAME] 2 then added the powdered bouillon to the meat and stirred the powder into the meat. [NAME] 2 confirmed by stating she did not follow a recipe and was supposed to follow the facility recipes and use measuring cups/spoons to put the beef broth into the meat. [NAME] 2 stated she had only been employed by the facility for 2 weeks and could not remember an in-service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure leftover tuna was stored in the refrigerator 2. Ensure staff personal bottle of water was not stored in the residents kitchen refrigerator 3. Ensure multiple food items with expiration dates were disposed 4. Ensure multiple food items were labeled with expiration dates or used by dates 5. Ensure debris did not collect on paper towel dispenser 6. Handwashing/eye washing station sink was clean 7. Six cutting knives were clean 8.Ensure eight of 17 resident trays were not cracked and chipped. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (a transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another or one object to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses and other toxins) medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour observation and concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed guidelines on wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses, PPE may include respirators, gloves, overalls, boots, disposable gowns, and goggles) when providing care to three of five sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 37, Resident 43) who were on enhanced barrier precautions (utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms) room. This deficient practice placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for acquiring and transmitting infections and diseases. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength leading to paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Repair leaking pipe under the kitchen sink. 2. Maintain maintenance repair logs and schedules. These failures had the potential to cause mold (a soft, green or gray growth that develops on old food or on objects that have been left for too long in warm, wet air) to grow that can cause the residents to become ill. Findings: During the initial tour observation of the kitchen and concurrent interview on 5/23/25 at 5:33 p.m., with Dietary [NAME] 1, there was a leaking pipe under a sink and a green bucket was under the sink to catching the water leaking from the pipe. Dietary [NAME] 1 stated the water under the sink has been leaking for about 1 (one) week. Dietary [NAME] 1 stated he notified the maintenance supervisor last week that the pipe under the kitchen was leaking. During an interview on 5/24/24 at 12:49 p.m., the Maintenance Supervisor stated he was notified on 5/23/25 at 5:45 p.m., that there was a leaking pipe under the sink in the kitchen. Maintenance Supervisor stated if there is a leaking pipe in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure nine of nine Resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, and 12) met the 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) requirement per resident according to federal regulation by 2. Ensure a bariatric bed (a heavy-duty, typically wider bed designed to accommodate individuals who are significantly overweight) did not impede the free movement of staff and one of three resident (Resident 148). This deficient practice resulted in impeding the free movement of Resident 148 and had the potential to impede the free movement of staff and guests. Findings: a. During a review of the facility Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 5/23/2025, submitted by the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated there are 11 rooms that did not meet the 80 sq. ft. requirement per resident according to federal regulation. The letter indicated that the room sizes would not interfere with the daily nursing care or safety of the residents. The letter also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party (RP) was informed and consented in advance, of the risks and benefits of psychotherapeutic medications (used to treat a variety of mental health conditions by affecting brain chemistry and behavior) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 35) reviewed for psychotropic medications (a medication which are available on prescription to treat a certain type of mental health problems). This deficient practice violated resident/RP's right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychotropic medications. Findings: During a record review, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bariatric bed (a heavy-duty, typically wider bed designed to accommodate individuals who are significantly overweight) did not impede the free movement of staff and one of three resident (Resident 148). This deficient practice resulted in impeding the free movement of Resident 148 and had the potential to impede the free movement of staff and guests. Cross Reference F912 Findings: During a record review Resident 148's admission indicated, Resident 148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (a chronic (long-lasting) disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body, as well as fatigue and trouble sleeping), muscle weakness, rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic, autoimmune disease that causes inflammation in the joints, leading to pain, stiffness, and swelling), hypertension (high blood pressure) and spondylosis (the degeneration of the spine, particularly the intervertebral discs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve the resident ' s grievance concerning missing/lost personal belongings of property by failing to list belongings inventory upon admission for one of two sampled residents (Resident 37). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 37's missing clothes and personal belongings. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 37 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral infection or toxins in the blood), aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak) and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 3/5/2025, indicated Resident 37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free of unnecessary physical restraint, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 38) when: 1. Resident 38's middle bed frame was low with a sagging mattress that restricted Resident 38 from getting out of bed. 2. Resident 38 was observed with a bedside table parked alongside Resident 38 while he was in bed that restricted the resident's movement. This deficient practice resulted in unnecessary restraint and placed the resident at risk of entrapment. Cross Reference F656 Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral infection or toxins in the blood), muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle) and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a background checks and screening on applicants for positions with direct access to residents was completed for two of 12 sampled employees reviewed according to facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P) titled, Background Screening Investigation. This deficient practice placed all 41 residents in the facility at risk of violence, theft and other safety issues. Findings: During a record review, Registered Nurse (RN) 2 employee file on 5/25/2025 at 2:14 p.m., indicated that RN 2 was hired on 12/18/2022. RN 2's employee file indicated there were no background checks and screening completed during or after her (RN 2) hired date. During a record review, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 employee file on 5/25/2025 at 2:25 p.m., indicated that LVN 1 was hired on 6/4/2024. LVN 1's employee file indicated there were no background checks and screening completed during or after her (LVN 1) hired date. During a concurrent interview and record review with Director of Staff and Development (DSD) 1 on 5/25/2025 at 3:33 p.m., DSD 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain a safe and functional environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 38) by ensuring that there are no items that may cause him an injury according to Resident 38's behavior of putting objects on his mouth. 2. Properly evaluate one of six sampled residents (Resident 36)'s elopement (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) risk assessment (a numerical score used to determine the likelihood of a person, often a patient in a care setting, leaving a facility without authorization or staff knowledge) These deficient findings had the potential to place the residents at increased risk for injuries and accidents. Cross Reference F656 Findings: A. During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff labeled an open date (indicates how long a medication is safe to use once the container has been opened) of ipratropium-albuterol (used to prevent and treat difficulty breathing, wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness) inhalation solution and Atrovent sulfate (medication used to help with difficulty breathing in people) inhalation solution for two of six sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the effectiveness of the medications, leading to potential complications related to the management of medications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and chronic respiratory failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: A. Ensure one of five sampled residents, (Resident 38)'s diclofenac cream medication (used to treat pain and other symptoms of arthritis of the joints such as inflammation, swelling, stiffness, and joint pain) was properly stored and secured per the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Medication Labeling and Storage reviewed by the facility on 4/2025. B. Ensure pill cutters assigned one of to two medication Carts (Medication Cart 1 ) was maintained clean and sanitized. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to medication under and/or overdosing which could result in serious injury, harm, and death and had the potential to compromise the safety and effectiveness of medications. These deficient practices also had the potential to spread infection and/or diseases. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable and of nutritive value for two of 38 residents (Residents 14 and 25) This deficient practice had the potential for residents to have poor meal intake and could lead to weight loss. Findings: During a lunch test tray with the Dietary Supervisor and two Surveyors on 5/25/2025 at 1:15 p.m., the test tray consisted of pork chop, baked potato, mixed vegetables, dinner roll, and slice of cake, milk, and juice. The pork chop was over cooked, hard around the edges and without flavor. The baked potato was over cooked and hard near the edges, mixed vegetables were not palatable. The dinner roll was hard and over cooked. During an interview on 5/25/25 at 2:10 p.m., Resident 14 stated the facility food was not palatable, the pork chops were too hard to eat. Resident 14 stated she had to request a sandwich as an alternative. Stated the food in the facility is not good and it makes her mad that she has to eat a lot of sandwiches just to get full. During an interview on 5/25/25 at 2:36 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to ensure facility did not leave a breakfast tray within reach of one out of two Residents (Resident 28) who was at risk for aspiration (food, liquid, or other foreign material enters the airway and lungs instead of the stomach), requiring 100% feeding assistance from facility staff. This deficient practice potential to result in choking, aspiration pneumonia (lung infection resulting from foreign material entering the airways), resulting in serious injury or death. Findings: During a record review Resident 28's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by underlying systemic conditions that disrupt the body's chemical processes), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), obesity (abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health), hearing loss right and left ear,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview facility failed to ensure 1 out of 2 interviewed Residents (Resident1) was provided a fortified CCHO diet (Consistent carbohydrate diet: meals contain carbohydrate-rich foods in fairly equal amounts which help maintain stable blood sugar levels) regular texture, Regular liquid consistency, double portion protein for breakfast and dinner for weight and nutritional management as per physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) due to lack of food, malnutrition, organ failure, and death. Findings: During a review, Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin [hormone that regulates sugar in the blood], or the cells don't respond to insulin properly), anemia (a condition that develops when your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights timely for two of two sample residents (Residents 148 and 25) when needing assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) from facility staff. This failure resulted in the residents getting angry. Findings: a. During a record review, Resident 148's admission Record indicated Resident 148, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (a condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin, or the cells don't respond properly to the insulin that is produced, leading to high blood sugar levels, essential hypertension (a chronic condition of persistently high blood pressure with no identifiable cause), generalized muscle weakness (a widespread loss of muscle strength that isn't limited to a specific muscle or region). During a record review, Resident 148's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 5/22/2025, indicated Resident 148's cognitive (mental process of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, Facility failed to provide a sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to ensure waste equipment was not overflowing with waste in the waste disposal area. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the rapid growth and infestation of disease-causing organisms such as bacteria, insects, vermin, respiratory diseases, infections and air pollution. Findings: During a facility tour on 5/25/2025 at 11:03am, facility waste equipment was observed to be overflowing and disposed waste was spilling over to the ground of the waste dumping area. During an observation on 5/25/2025 at 11:35am, Maintenance (MTD) was observed standing on top of the overflowing trash bin attempting to press down the garbage into the trash can. During an interview on 5/25/2025 at 6:51PM, MTD stated trash waste was not supposed to overflow out of the trash cans and the trash lids had to be kept shut to prevent exposure of waste in the trash bins. MTD stated overflowing waste could attract and expose residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures titled Requesting, Refusing and/or Discontinuing Care and Treatment, reviewed March 2025, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). By failing to notify Resident 1 ' s physician of the resident ' s refusal to take prescribed tuberculosis (TB, a contagious disease caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which typically affects the lungs) medications: 1. Isoniazid (used to treat TB and/or prevent its return) 300 milligrams (mg, metric unit of measure) refused on 4/9/25, 4/12/25, 4/13/25, 4/25/25, and 5/2/25. 2. Pyridoxine 50 mg (treats vitamin B6 deficiency) refused on 4/9/25, 4/12/25, 4/13/25, 4/25/25, and 5/2/25. 3. Rifampin (antimicrobial medication used to kill TB bacteria in the body) 300 mg refused on 4/20/25, 4/25/25, and 5/2/25. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 becoming reinfected with active TB, a delay in care and treatment, or cause a decline on overall medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their own Policy and Procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), physician had educated Resident 1 or her Responsible Party (RP) about the risks and benefits of taking mirtazapine (an antidepressant used to treat major depressive disorder). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 in receiving a medication that she (Resident 1) was not well informed about. Findings: During a review of the admission record for Resident 1 indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) , and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of the facility document titled INFORMED CONSENT- INFORMED CONSENT FOR USE OF PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION, for Resident 1 indicated, mirtazapine 7.5 milligram (mg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding reporting of a resident-to-resident altercation and to submit a conclusion report of investigation within five days or in accordance with state or federal law for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of abuse was investigated which can also lead to a delay in prevention of further abuse for Resident 1 and Resident 2. Cross Reference F610. Findings: A. During a review of the Resident 1 ' s admission Record, it indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and peripheral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedure by failing to investigate a resident-to-resident altercation between two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility and failure to protect residents from abuse. Cross Reference F609. Findings: A. During a review of the Resident 1 ' s admission Record, it indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – resident assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one out of four residents (Resident 3), the facility failed to ensure the enteral feeding (liquid nutrition -a medical procedure that delivers nutrients, medications, and or fluids directly into the gastrointestinal [GI] tract) bottle/container was: 1. Labeled time when the feeding was hung up. 2. The enteral feeding was disposed/discarded after 48 hours as per facility's policy and procedures and the manufacturer's guidelines to prevent the growth of microorganisms that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food), as well as toxins. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to Resident 3 and placed the resident at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of four residents received the correct therapeutic dose (of oxygen (a colorless, odorless gas that is essential for life and the proper functioning of the body) as ordered by the physician This deficient practice placed Resident 4 at risk of oxygen poisoning (lung damage that happens from breathing in too much extra (supplemental) oxygen.) and had the potential to negatively impact the Resident 4 ' s health and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, encephalopathy (a change in your brain function due to injury or disease), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression (a depressed mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease marked by permanent damage to tissues in the lungs) During a review of Resident 4s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe its infection control policy for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure the licensed nurse did not administer Resident 1 a pill/medication that had fallen onto the floor. This deficient practice resulted in the contamination of Residents 1's medication and had the potential to cause gastrointestinal illnesses and possibly hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease in which your body does not produce enough insulin needed to control sugar levels in the blood), hypertension (HTN -elevated blood pressure), and generalized muscle weakness (lack of physical or muscle strength). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 6/11/2024, indicated Resident 1 had moderately intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) and from verbal abuse (the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents; including harassing, mocking, yelling, cussing, or threatening) by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN2) did not engage in a verbal altercation with Resident 1 and cuss at Resident 1. As a result, Resident 1 was exposed to verbal abuse from LVN2, placing the Resident 1 at risk for psychosocial harm, mental anguish (suffering) and emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/16/2024, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disorder of the brain caused by disease, injury, drugs, or chemicals), psychosis (a mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to recognize reality or relate to others), depression and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized data collection tool used to assess cognitive brain's ability to think, read, learn,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to inform one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) and Resident 1's representative/family/responsible party that Resident 1 would be discharged from Skilled Nursing Facility 1 (SNF1) to SNF2 before 5/16/2024. This deficient practice resulted in SNF1 transferring Resident 1 to SNF2 on 5/16/2024. Resident 1 became aggressive towards staff and difficult to manage at SNF2. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/16/2024, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disorder of the brain caused by disease, injury, drugs, or chemicals), psychosis (a mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to recognize reality or relate to others), depression and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized data collection tool used to assess cognitive brain's ability to think, read, learn, remember, reason, express thoughts, and make decisions] and functional status, and care needs) dated 5/16/2024, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and food handling practices in the kitchen by failing to ensure one of three staff (Cook 1) wore a hairnet and gloves while working in the kitchen area while preparing food. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of bacteria from one object to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in all 41 medically compromised facility residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an initial brief tour observation of the kitchen on 5/25/2024 at 7:21 a.m., [NAME] 1 was observed not wearing a hairnet while working in the kitchen and handling food which was to be served directly to residents. [NAME] 1 was also observed not wearing gloves while handling food to be served directly to residents. During an interview on 5/25/2024 at 7:24 a.m. with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 stated she should have worn a hairnet and gloves while working in the kitchen area and handling food to be served to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to ensure an accurate post-fall assessment was performed. 2. Failing to perform an assessment and interdisciplinary team meeting after Resident 1 was found on the floor. This deficient practice had the potential to result in miscommunication among staff about Resident 1 ' s fall risk. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical, dated 9/21/2023, indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool), dated 9/25/2023, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure physician ' s order for Ativan (psychotropic medication [any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior] to treat anxiety) to be administered as necessary (PRN), did not exceed 14 days for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures titled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 12/2016. As a result, Resident 1 received PRN Ativan for 22 days for the month of 9/2023, with the potential to result in the use of unnecessary psychotropic medication, undesired side effects and adverse consequences including a decline in quality of life and functional capacity for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission records (facesheet) indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- ongoing inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that reflected the assessment and immediate needs including interventionst that addressed fall risk for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 3 to not receive appropriate care and treatments specific to his needs including interventions to prevent falling. Findings: A review of the admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), muscle weakness, and abnormalities in gait and mobility. A review of the fall risk assessment, dated 8/28/2023, indicated Resident 3 was a high risk for fall secondary to his intermittent confusion, history of 1-2 falls in the past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure four of four sample residents (Resident 9, Resident 18, Resident 131 and Resident 134) were fed in a dignified manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During an observation on 01/24/22 at 12:48 PM, certified nursing assistant (CNA) 2 was observed feeding Resident 131, while standing over the resident. During an observation on 01/24/22 at 12:50 PM restorative nursing assistant (RNA) 1 was observed feeding Resident 18, while standing over the resident. During an observation on 01/24/22 at 12:55 PM RNA 2 was observed feeding Resident 9, while standing over the resident. During an observation on 01/25/22 at 12:34 PM CNA 3 was observed feeding Resident 134, while standing over the resident. During an observation with concurrent interview with CNA 2 on 01/25/22 at 12:45 PM, CNA 2 was observed seated and feeding Resident 131 and RNA 2 was observed seated feeding Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device used by a resident to signal for assistance from the facility's staff) was within reach for four out of four residents (Residents 7, 330, 331, and 326). This deficient practice had the potential for delay in responding to the necessary care and services by facility staff , increasing residents' risk for skin breakdown, skin irritation, and falls. Findings: A review of Resident 7's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 7's diagnoses included spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces within the spine, which can put pressure on the nerves that travel through the spine), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure) and glaucoma (eye condition that may cause blindness). A review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 10/21/21, indicated the resident was cognitively (the mental action or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a dedicated director of nursing (DON) and registered nurse (RN) supervisor whose hours were not shared with a second facility. This failure had the potential to affect resident care, clinical outcomes, and assessment. Findings: A review of the facility's Registered Nurse - Supervisor job description with release date of May 2017 indicated, The Supervisor is an RN who is responsible for the overall supervision of nursing care in the facility during their shift. Responsible for the provision of direct, age specific, resident care to those assigned to his/her care for each established shift. A review of the facility's Director of Nursing job description with release date of May 2017 indicated, The Director of Nursing has 24-hour accountability and is responsible for the delivery of high-quality and cost-effective health care while achieving positive clinical outcomes, and patient/family and employee satisfaction. During a concurrent interview and record review of the facility's staff schedules for January of 2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services when Dietary Aide 1 failed to describe how to manually wash dishes correctly. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary food preparation and production, and a potential for food-borne illness affecting all residents who received foods from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/24/2022, at 9:39 AM, with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1), he stated he is one of the dishwashers, and he would wash, sanitize, then rinse dishes at the three-compartment sink for manual dishwashing. For the required sanitizing contact time (contact time is how long a disinfectant needs to stay wet on a surface in order to be effective) during manual dishwashing, the DA 1 stated that the sanitizing process would need about 10 to 20 seconds. A review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, 3 Compartment Procedure for Manual Dish Washing, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) follow portion size as written on the menu for residents on mechanical soft and regular diet. Residents on mechanical soft and regular diet received inaccurate portion. 2) follow instructions as written on the tray card for residents on NAS (no added salt) diet. With two trays marked NAS on the tray card, each had a salt packet. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive wrong protein and caloric intake when not following the menu, which could result in undernutrition or overnutrition and further compromise their medical status. Findings: 1) A review of the facility's document titled, Cooks Spreadsheet Winter Menus, dated 12/27/21, 01/24/22, and 02/21/22, indicated food portioning as follows: a) regular portion for regular black beans should be served with a #12 scoop providing a 1/3 cup; b) regular portion for mechanical soft beef enchilada was not indicated; c) regular portion for pureed beef enchilada should be served with a #8 scoop providing a 1/2 cup. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at appetizing temperatures and as recommended per its policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in decreased food intake and affect the nutrition needs for the residents who ate at the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/24/22, at 12:49 PM, with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the conference room, the DS confirmed and acknowledged multiple food items served on the test tray did not meet the recommended temperature indicated on the facility's policy as follows: a) Regular black bean: 117°F. b) Rice: 110°F. c) Custard: 54.7°F. d) Milk: 49.5°F. A review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Meal Service, dated 2020, indicated recommended temperature at delivery to resident as follows: a) Hot Entrée: greater than or equal to 120°F; b) Fruit or Cold Dessert: less than or equal to 50°F; c) Milk/Cold Beverage: less than or equal to 45°F. A review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Meal Service, dated 2020, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program was maintained, as evidenced by: 1) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) did not perform hand hygiene when indicated. 2) Housekeeping staff (HKS 1) did not properly take off personal protective equipment (PPE - personal protective equipment, including isolation gown, gloves, face mask, face shield, and goggles) before exiting Resident 331's red zone room (an area/room of the facility where COVID-19 positive residents are placed during quarantine to control the spread of infection). These deficient practices had the potential for cross-contamination, resulting in spreading infections to the residents and staff in the facility. Findings: 1) During an observation on 01/24/22 at 12:30 PM, CNA 1 delivered a lunch tray to Resident 333 and did not perform hand hygiene before or after getting Resident 333's lunch tray from the tray cart and entering or exiting Resident 333's room. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two out of two residents (Resident 329 and 331), as evidenced by: 1) Resident 329 did not have adequate space for personal belongings 2) Resident 331's room furniture was in poor condition These deficient practices had the potential to negatively impact the comfort level and quality of life of the residents. Findings: 1) A review of Resident 329's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the facility admitted Resident 329 on 01/12/22, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, muscle weakness (lack of strength in the muscles), major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities), and seizures (abnormal brain activity). During an observation on 01/24/22 at 10:28 AM, Resident 329's had personal belongings at his bedside. During a concurrent interview, Resident 329 stated he did not have space to place his personal belongings. Resident 329 further stated his closet had clothes belonging to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sample residents (Resident 133) was free from physical restraints. This failure resulted in a violation of the Resident 133's right to be free from restraints. Findings: During an observation on 01/24/22 at 11:31 AM, Resident 133's bed was observed being pushed against the wall. During an observation on 01/24/22 at 12:35 PM, Resident 133's bed was observed staying pushed against the wall. During an interview on 01/25/22 at 02:47 PM with infection preventionist (IPN), the IPN stated resident's bed should not be pushed up against the wall, unless there is an order, and bed up against the wall is care planned as a resident's preference, otherwise it can be considered a restraint. The IPN further stated they do not use restraints at this facility, and in resident's 133 case, the bed up against the wall was the resident's personal preference. A review of Resident 133's admission Record, dated 01/25/22, indicated, Resident 133…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for 1) Restraints or personal preference of resident bed against the wall for one of two sample residents (Resident 133). 2) Psychotropic medication (a drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) for two of four sample residents (Resident 12 and Resident 133). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in monitoring the restraints or personal preferences and a delay in recognizing signs and symptoms of side effects associated with psychotropic medication use. Findings: 1). During an observation on 01/24/22 at 11:31 AM, Resident 133's bed was observed being pushed against the wall. During an observation on 01/24/22 at 12:35 PM, Resident 133's bed was observed staying pushed against the wall. During an interview on 01/25/22 at 02:47 PM with infection preventionist (IPN), the IPN stated resident's bed should not be pushed up against the wall, unless there is an order, and bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss (LAL) mattress (mattress designed for pressure reducing which is used to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was set up correctly for one of two sampled residents (Resident 18). This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to the worsening of pressure wound and/or delay wound healing. Findings: During an observation on 01/24/22 at 10:36 AM, Resident 18's LAL mattress machine/pump setting was set to 5, 210 lb (pound). During an interview with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 2 on 01/24/22 at 11:55 AM, CNA 2 stated she did not touch the air mattress pump settings, nor did she know what the appropriate setting for the resident should be. During a concurrent observation and interview with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1 on 01/24/22 at 12:30 PM, LVN 1 stated she did not know the exact setting for the air mattress pump, but she knew there must have been an order for it. After checking physician orders in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 8) received the accurate flow rate of oxygen according to physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 8's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), emphysema (lung condition that causes shortness of breath) and heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 01/07/22, indicated that Resident 8 was moderately cognitively (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident rooms did not accommodate no more than four residents per room for two of eight Resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health caregivers. Findings: During a review of the facility Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 5/23/2025, submitted by the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated there are rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had six beds per room. The letter indicated that the room sizes would not interfere with the daily nursing care or safety of the residents. The letter also indicated there would be enough space to provide for each resident's care, dignity and privacy in those rooms which are in accordance with the special needs of the residents. The letter indicated the spaces would not have an adverse effect on the residents' health and safety or impede the ability of any resident in the rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-27 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 13 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) accommodated no more than four residents in each room. Both rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had six residents in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the delivery of care and safety of the residents especially during an emergency. Findings: On 5/26/23 at 9:40 a.m., 11 a.m. and at 11:08 a.m., during a concurrent interview and observation of Resident 10 and Resident 33 respectively, residents verbalized the rooms afforded them adequate space. Residents were observed to ambulate and move freely in the rooms, accommodate their needs and staff were able to provide care safely and without restrictions. During an interview on 5/26/2024 at 1:46 p.m with Resident 10 and 33 both of whom stay in rooms with more than four residents per room, the residents stated they did not have any problems with their assigned rooms. A review of room waiver request letter dated 5/26/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-27 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for ten out of the 13 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12). Of the ten Resident rooms, nine rooms consisted of three beds each and two rooms consisted of six beds in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health caregivers. Findings: A review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 5/26/2024, submitted by the Administrator, indicated there are ten rooms not meeting the 80 square feet requirement per resident according to federal regulation. The letter indicated that the room sizes would not interfere with the daily nursing care or safety of the residents. The letter also indicated there would be enough space to provide for each resident's care, dignity and privacy in those rooms which are in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the requirement for no more than four residents per room for two of 13 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 12). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide sufficient nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: A review of the Client Accommodation Analysis form completed by the facility indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] and 12 housed six beds per room. On 01/24/22, the Administrator (ADM) submitted a letter requesting for a waiver for room with more than four residents per room for the following rooms: - room [ROOM NUMBER]- with six resident capacity = 466 floor area square feet - room [ROOM NUMBER]- with six resident capacity = 475 floor area square feet During the recertification survey on 01/24/22, it was observed that the residents residing in the rooms with an application for variance had sufficient amount of space for residents to move freely inside the rooms. There were adequate spaces for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that ten of 13 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to have inadequate space for resident care and mobility. Findings: On 01/24/22, the Administrator (ADM) submitted the application for the Room Variance Waiver for ten rooms. The room variance letter indicated that these rooms did not meet the 80 square feet per resident requirement. The room waiver request showed the following: Room # Square Number of Square Feet Footage Beds per Resident 1 226 3 75.3 2 226 3 75.3 3 226 3 75.3 4 226 3 75.3 5 226 3 75.3 6 226 3 75.3 8 226 3 75.3 9 226 3 75.3 11 465.3 6 77.55 12 475 6 79.16 The minimum requirement for a three bedroom should be at least 240 square feet. The minimum requirement for a six bedroom should be at least 480 square feet. During the recertification survey at the facility from 01/24/22 to 01/27/22, it was observed that the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AM HOLDCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 05/01/2023
LEHMANN, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 03/01/2021
MOAS, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST14%since 05/01/2021
OSCHEROWITZ, AVISHAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 05/01/2023
ABE AND RACHEL BAK FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2021
BAK, RACHELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2021
GASTWIRTH, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
BAK, ABRAHAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
MONTAG, MEMPHISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
RUTHERFORD, KEINOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
ABAK CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
MGAZ CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
GEWIRTZ, CHONOCHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 29%Other / private 0%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$439per resident / day
operating cost
$13,354per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$432per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055748. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next