No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Baldwin Gardens Nursing Center

10786 Live Oak Avenue, Temple City, CA 91780 · Government - Federal · 59 certified beds · (626) 447-3553 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 447-3553 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
601 Las Tunas Dr · (626) 462-0000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9952 Las Tunas Dr · (626) 614-1500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Ralphs0.8 mi
9470 Las Tunas Dr · (626) 286-0898 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10144 Bogue St · (626) 579-0461 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.1%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.5%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.3%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.6%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.762.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.031.571.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.67U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.0%CMS range 25.9–44.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.8–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge81.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.7–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.611.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
24.3%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.84 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan (a document that outlines a person's health needs and the care they require) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Facility did not ensure a care plan was developed for Resident 1's diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis ([rhabdo] a life-threatening medical condition involving the rapid breakdown of damaged skeletal muscle). This deficient practice negatively affected Resident 1's care and created an immediate risk to Resident 1's health, safety, and quality of life. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis and encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure causing a declining ability to reason and concentrate, memory loss, personality change, seizures, and twitching). During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served to meet individualized needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) when: 1. Dietary cook (DC) failed to honor Residents 3's food dislikes and served Resident 3 turkey for lunch. 2. Licensed nurses did not verify Resident 3's food was correct prior to serving food to Resident 3. These deficient practices did not meet Residents 3's individual needs. It had the potential to impact Resident 3's nutritional intake. It made Resident 3 feel unsatisfied with the meal and caused Resident 3 not to want to eat the meal. During an observation on 6/23/2026 at 12:38 p.m., in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was sitting at bedside staring at food tray. Food was untouched. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide a working call light to one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay or the inability in obtaining necessary care and services for Resident 3. During an observation on 6/23/2026 at 12:42 p.m., in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 pushed call light and call light outside of room did not light up and there was no audible sound. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration, and the ability to carry out day-to-day tasks) and left artificial knee joint (replaces a missing or damaged natural joint). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical Examination (H&P, physician clinical evaluation and examination of the resident), dated 6/2/2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) for one of one facility kitchen, as evidenced by:1.Ground turkey meat bag dated 5/15/25 was placed on top of an ice bag inside the kitchen freezer. 2.Ten (10) fruit cups inside the kitchen refrigerator were expired, dated 1/26/26.3. Fourteen (14) red pudding cups inside the kitchen refrigerator were expired, dated 1/26/26.4. [NAME] rice and [NAME] rice inside plastic containers had a best by date of 1/6/26 in the dry storage room. 5. Test strips to measure the concentration of the sanitizer solution inside the Red bucket had an expiration date of 11/1/24. These deficient practices had the potential for food borne illnesses.Findings: During initial kitchen observation and interview with the Director of Nutrition (DN) on 1/27/26 at 8:12 AM, a bag of ground turkey meat dated 5/15/25 was placed on top of an ice bag inside the kitchen freezer. The DN stated the ice machine inside the kitchen broke the night before so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention procedures to prevent the transmission of infectious organisms for four of eight sampled residents (Residents 1, 27, 43, and 61) by failing to: a. Cover the [NAME] Valve's (a device that controlled fluid flow in medical tubing) port, which had dry brown crust inside on Resident 1's gastrostomy tube (G-tube [GT], a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings/medications to be administered directly to the stomach) and ensure Resident 1's abdominal binder (a wrap that kept the belly secure to stop G-tube pulling) did not have brown stains. b. Ensure the incentive spirometer (IS, a tool that helps lungs breathe better) mouthpiece was not placed on the flat top surface of the nightstand for Resident 27. c. Date the nasal cannula (NC, a small plastic tube that fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) storage bag for Resident 43. d. Keep the Foley catheter (FC, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a signed Informed Consent (IC-ethical and legal process where a resident voluntarily confirms willingness for a procedure after being informed of relevant risks, benefits, and alternatives) from the resident's responsible party (RP) prior to the administration of Mirtazapine (medication used to treat depression [mood disorder causing persistent sadness]) 7.5 milligram (mg- unit of measurement), for one of one sampled resident (Resident 59). This deficient practice violated Resident 59 and the RP's right and had the potential for Resident 59 to receive medication against Resident 59 or Resident 59's RP's will. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung diseases that block airflow) and depression. During a review of Resident 59's History & Physical (H&P) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the notice of discharge to the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes) in a timely manner for one of one sampled resident (Resident 57). This deficient practice increased the risks of unsafe discharge and violation of Resident 57's rights.Findings: During a review of Resident 57's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 57 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain problem caused by body chemistry) and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 12/24/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 57 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand). The MDS indicated Resident 57 was dependent (helper did all the effort) on staff with eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene, toileting hygiene, showering/ bathing, and transferring. During a review of Resident 57's Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change - Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) assessment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 51). The resident was readmitted from the hospital with an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that's put into your bladder to drain urine into an external bag).This failure had the potential to affect the accuracy of the resident's assessment, care planning, and monitoring of the resident's needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 51's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 66's diagnoses included but are not limited to polyneuropathy, urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), depression (a serious mood disorder that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening too) reflected the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter for one of one sampled resident (Resident 51).This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's care planning and clinical decision-making.Findings:During a review of Resident 51's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 66's diagnoses included but are not limited to polyneuropathy, urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), depression (a serious mood disorder that causes persistent sadness and loss of interest in daily activities, affecting how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, and can lead to physical problems), obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order regarding the use of incentive spirometer (IS, a tool that helped lungs breathe better) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 27). This violation had the potential to compromise Resident 27's health and safety.Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain problem caused by body chemistry, often linked to respiratory infection [an illness affecting breathing]) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/4/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 27 could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/6/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 27 had severely impaired cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), the facility failed to:a. Ensure the low air loss mattress (LALM - a specialty bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure ulcers (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) was set accurately for Resident 3.b. Obtain a physician order for the use of LALM for Resident 3. These failures had the potential to impede healing and worsen Resident 3's wounds and cause further skin injuries. Findings:a. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/28/2025, the H&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to report an injury of unknown origin (IUO- injury in which the cause cannot be determined due to lack of witnesses and resident injured unable to express how the injury occurred) to officials including the State Survey Agency (SSA) and adult protective services (APS), immediately, but no later than 24 hours, and according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for IUO to occur to other residents without appropriate reporting and investigation. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 1 on 3/7/2024 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified intellectual disabilities (a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled bathrooms (Bathroom Room [BR] 1) had a functioning call light. This failure had the potential to result in residents being unable to notify staff for assistance. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/2024 at 12:07 PM with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) in BR 1, the call light button was observed to not stay on (pushed down) when pressed. CNA 1 stated the call light does not stay on and stated the risk of not having a working call light button was that the staff would not know if the resident would need help in the bathroom. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 12:15 PM with the Maintenance Worker (MW), the MW stated the call light button was not staying in place when pushed down and stated if the call light does not work then the resident would not be able to call staff for assistance. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 11:05 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the call light button in the bathroom should stay on (down) when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for four of four sampled residents (Residents 7, 9,12 and 23). These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 7, 9,12 and 23 not to receive necessary care or receive delayed services, placing the residents at risk for falls or injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (type of ischemic [deficient supply of blood] stroke [sudden death of brain cells in a localized area due to inadequate blood flow] resulting from a blockage in the blood vessels supplying blood to the brain) affecting left non-dominant side and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information regarding Advance Directive (AD, a written preferences regarding treatment options, a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents when individuals are not able to make their own healthcare decisions) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 11 and 25) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Advance Directives. This failure had the potential for the facility staff to provide services and treatment against the residents' choices. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 11 on 10/9/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on supplemental oxygen and gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support) status. During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents' (Residents 16 and 55) Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) reflected an accurate assessment, by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 16's discharge destination was coded correctly. Resident 16 was discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF - care provided by trained registered nurses in a medical setting under a doctor's supervision) and was coded in the MDS assessment as being discharged to home or community. b. Ensure Resident 55's diagnosis was coded accurately. These deficient practices resulted in an inaccurate reporting to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) Services agency and had the potential for Residents 16 and 55 not to receive interventions to address their specific care concerns. Findings: a.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had an environment free from accident hazards(risks) for two of five sampled residents (Residents 7 and 53) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 7's bilateral 1/4 siderails were padded as ordered by the physician. b. Ensure Resident 53's floor mat (used to reduce fall related trauma if a patient gets up from bed, loses balance, and falls to the floor) was close to the bed and the resident's bed lowered at the lowest position. These failures had the potential to result in accidents and hazards for Residents 7 and 53. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 7's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intervertebral disc disorder with myelopathy (a condition where the spinal cord is compressed), spondylosis (age-related wear and tear of the spinal disks), and epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) site as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the plan of care for three of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 26 and 36). These failures had the potential for complications related to tube feedings for Residents 1, 26 and 36. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings/medication to be administered directly to the stomach), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1's untitled Care Plan (CP), dated 8/1/2022, the CP indicated Resident 1 had the potential for skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt the use of appropriate alternatives to siderails before its installation for two of two sampled residents (Residents 9 and 39 ). These failures placed Residents 9 and 39 at risk for entrapment and injury from the use of siderails. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 39's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time) and compression fracture (occurs when one or more bones in the spine weaken and crumple) of first lumbar vertebrae. During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/30/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 39 had intact cognition (ability to understand) and required partial/moderate assistance (helper did less than half the effort) with oral hygiene, upper body dressing and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss (LAL) mattress (Alternating Pressure Mattress which provides alternating pressure and is designed to be used in the prevention, treatment and management of pressure injury [PI- a localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence]) was set up accurately based on the resident's weight for one of two sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure had the potential risk for Resident 10 to develop PI. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control). During a review of Resident 10's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 11/1/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 10 had an order for LAL mattress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for a resident with Foley catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on catheter care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 9). This failure had the potential to result in catheter-related complications for Resident 9. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection of the bladder/urinary tract) and chronic kidney disease (characterized by progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys). During a review of Resident 9's untitled Care Plan (CP) dated 11/20/2023, the CP indicated, Resident 9 had an indwelling catheter. The CP interventions included to check the tubing for kinks each shift. During a review of Resident 9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date the intravenous (IV, administered into a vein) site consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 157). This deficient practice had the potential to result in infection to Resident 157. Findings: During a review of Resident 157's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone and bone marrow due to infection) and left foot amputation (a surgical procedure that removes a limb or other body part). During a review of Resident 157's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 11/13/2024, Resident 157 had an order of Ceftriaxone (Antibiotic-medication to treat infection) 2 grams (gm, a unit of measurement) IV, once a day for osteomyelitis to left foot amputation. During a review of Resident 157's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 11/17/2024, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to label the nasal cannula (NC- tube which on one end splits into two prongs which are placed in the nostrils to deliver oxygen) tubing for one of two sampled residents (Resident 41). This failure had the potential to result in infection to Resident 41. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on supplemental oxygen and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/31/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 41 had no speech, rarely/never understood others, and rarely/never made self-understood. Resident 41 was dependent (helper does all of the effort) for personal hygiene and chair/bed-chair transfer. During a review of Resident 41's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 11/1/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 41 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on the pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication.) recommendations of the physician evaluating the use of Cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant medicine) in the elderly for one of five sampled residents (Resident 10). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident receiving unnecessary medications and not maintaining the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and not preventing or minimizing adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccine that protects against serious and potentially fatal pneumococcal disease that is caused by bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus)] based on the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s recommended schedule guidelines for one of five sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure had the potential to result in leaving residents at risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services by failing to: a. Assess one of one sampled resident (Resident 17) who developed edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues) of the left lower leg. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed care and services to address Resident 17's edema. b. Complete a Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR-a written communication tool that helps provide essential, concise information during crucial situations) report for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7), when Resident 7 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) for a medical emergency. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 7's health information not communicated between healthcare providers affecting the quality of care for Resident 7. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened food items had use by date for one of one dry storage area in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an observation of the dry food storage area in the Kitchen on 12/1/23 at 5:18 pm, the following items were opened and did not have use-by-date label: One plastic storage container of breadcrumbs that was opened on 9/14/23. One plastic storage container of sweetened coconut flakes that was opened on 9/7/23. One bottle of onion powder that was opened on 12/16/22 and will expire on 8/15/25. One bottle of curry powder that was opened on 8/10/23 and will expire on 7/31/24. One bottle of black pepper that was opened on 9/24/23 and will expire on 4/24/25. One bottle of chili powder that was opened on 11/20/23 and will expire on 4/4/24. During an interview on 12/1/23 at 5:40 pm, the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) stated the kitchen staff needed to abide by the expiration date of the food item such as the expiration date of the breadcrumbs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure titled Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy by ensuring the resident's identifiable, personal, and medical information were not exposed on the computer screen unattended and in view of unauthorized persons for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 47). This deficient practice resulted in Residents 1 and 47's violation of resident's right for privacy to keep their personal and medical records confidential and not readily observable and accessible by others. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 10/30/2023 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, anemia (lack of red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to the body's tissues), and hypertension (increase blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical assessment dated [DATE], the assessment indicated Resident 1 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 46) who was at risk for fall, by failing to ensure the resident's call light was within reach as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Answering the Call Light and the resident's plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 46 not to receive or received delayed care to meet the necessary services that could potentially result in falls and/or accidents. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 46 on 8/8/2021 with diagnoses that included epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain) and peripheral vascular disease ( a condition in which there is a build-up of fat and narrowing of arteries in the limbs, reducing blood flow). During a review of Resident 46's History…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan of care (details why a person received care, assessed health or care needs, medical history, personal details, expected and aimed outcomes, and what care and support will be delivered, how, when and by whom) with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the residents' needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 36) who had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and was on Humulin R (type of insulin [a hormone that works by lowering levels of sugar in the blood]) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 36 to not receive the necessary care, treatment and/or services. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission record, the record indicated the facility admitted Resident 36 on 7/15/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 50). This deficient practice had the potential to not support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of Resident 50. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/11/23 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (build-up of toxins causing brain dysfunction,) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 11/6/23, the MDS indicated Resident 50 was rarely/never able to express ideas and wants and rarely/never understands verbal content. The MDS indicated Resident 50 was dependent in all activities of daily living. During an interview on 12/2/23 at 5:24 pm, the Activities Director (AD) stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the presence of white sediments (visible particles in the urine that may contain red or white blood cells, casts or bacteria that could indicate infection) in the urine for one of four sampled residents (Resident 36) with suprapubic catheter (a hollow flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder through a cut in the abdomen used to drain urine from the bladder) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Suprapubic Catheter Care and the resident's plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 36 not to receive care or delayed care and treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI, condition in which bacteria invade and grow in any part the urinary system), hospitalization or sepsis (severe infection). Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission record, the admission record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 36 on 10/27/23 with diagnoses that included dementia (long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the head of bed was kept elevated to 30 to 45 degrees for one of two sampled residents (Resident 16) with ongoing G-tube (a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) feeding. This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications from aspiration (food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and lungs by accident). Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pneumonia (respiratory infection), metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long-term medical condition resulting in unusual blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/10/2023, indicated Resident 16 had clear speech, sometimes understood others, and sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe administration of medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) during medication pass administration. Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) crushed Alfuzosin (medication used to treat symptoms of an enlarged prostate in men, including difficulty urinating) Hydrochloride (HCL) Extended Release (ER-medications that slowly released over a period of time, that do not immediately release the active ingredients of the medication into the body, through the use of enteric coating which should not be crushed) and administered the medication to Resident 7 through the G-tube (external opening into the stomach for medication/nutritional support). This deficient practice had the potential to result in rapid absorption of a large dose of the drug that was intended to be released slowly over many hours which can cause harm to Resident 7. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nectar-thickened fluid (liquid having the same thickness as vegetable juices and milkshakes) was provided to one of one sampled resident (Resident 21) in accordance with the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for aspiration (accidentally swallowing food or liquid into the lungs) for Resident 21. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/1/2022 with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 10/18/23, the MDS indicated Resident 21 rarely/never able to express ideas and wants and rarely/never understands verbal content. The MDS indicated Resident 21 was totally dependent with all activities of daily living. During an observation on 12/3/23 at 9:50 am, Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) delivered a pitcher of water to Resident 21's bedside table. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary supplement was served as ordered for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's dietary intake which could result in inadequate nutrition or further weight loss of Resident 22. Findings: During a review of the facility's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 22's care plan for nutritional and dehydration risk, initiated 4/13/2023, the care plan interventions included for staff to provide Ensure Clear twice a day with lunch and dinner. During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 11/6/2023, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula tubing (a device used to deliver oxygen to a resident) did not touch the floor for one of six sampled residents (Resident 58) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of infection to Resident 58. Findings: During a review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 58 on 10/5/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood) with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues), dependence on supplemental (treatment that provides with extra oxygen to breathe) oxygen and congestive heart failure (CHF, heart disease that affects the pumping action of the heart muscle). During a review of Resident 58's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/5/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 58's had the capacity to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-11-22 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include the census information on the daily shift staffing posting for three of three recertifications days inspected (11/19/2024, 11/20/2024, and 11/21/2024). This deficient practice of posting incomplete daily shift staffing information could mislead the residents and visitors and potentially affect the quality of nursing care provided to the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's daily shift staffing posting dated 11/19/2024, 11/20/2024, and 11/21/2024, the daily shift staffing posting information included the name of the facility, the date for which the information was posted, type and category of nursing staff working during the shift, the projected and actual hours worked during the shift for each category and the nursing staff. During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 11:02 am with the Lobby Receptionist (LR), LR stated she was responsible for completing and posting the daily shift staffing. LR stated the daily shift staffing posting should include the census information at the beginning of the shift to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEHMANN, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF24%since 03/13/2020
BAK, ABRAHAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2020
GASTWIRTH, MENACHEMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2020
GEWIRTZ, CHONOCHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2020
HOROWICZ, AVIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/21/2025
SHAH, JAYKUMARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2020
ABAK CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
BASTOMSKI LIVING TRUST DATED APRIL 18, 1997OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007
LIVE OAK TC 1, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007
LIVE OAK TC 2, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007
MAYER 2005 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007
MGAZ CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
BASTOMSKI, ISRAELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007
MAYER, HELENEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007
MAYER, RONALDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$440K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 32%Other / private 1%

This home reported $440K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$475per resident / day
operating cost
$14,444per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$472per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555055. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next