No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Imperial Healthcare Center

11926 La Mirada Blvd, La Mirada, CA 90638 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (562) 943-7156 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 943-7156 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
15082 Imperial Hwy · (562) 789-5484 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
14865 Telegraph Rd · (562) 567-6498 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14928 Leffingwell Rd · (562) 903-1221 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(805) 968-2017 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11818 La Mirada Blvd · (562) 943-7255

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.5%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.922.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.401.571.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 224 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 155 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.0%CMS range 36.9–51.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.7–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.5%CMS range 6.6–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
24.2%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan to address one of one sampled residents' (Resident 2) refusal to use the call light prior to toileting.This failure resulted in Resident 2 using the bathroom unassisted and sustaining a fall.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included ataxia (poor muscle control) following cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), generalized muscle weakness, and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/12/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 2's cognitive skills for daily decision making (process of thinking) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 2 required partial assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting, bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the primary physician of Resident 2's fall in the bathroom.This failure had the potential to result in missed or delayed diagnosis and interventions for serious injuries.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/8/2026 with diagnoses including ataxia (poor muscle control) following cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), generalized muscle weakness, and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/12/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 2's cognitive skills for daily decision making (process of thinking) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 2 required partial assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting, bathing, upper/lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 2 had prior falls. During a review of Resident 2's Progress Note, dated 6/9/2026, the Progress Note indicated Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report one of one sampled resident's (Resident 1) abuse allegation to the State Agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]), the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and local law enforcement when Resident 1 alleged he was grabbed by his right arm without his consent.This failure resulted in a delay of an onsite investigation and had the potential to result in further potential abuse to Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by intense, excessive, and persistent worry or fear about everyday situations), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility did not:1. Obtain vital signs and conduct 72-hour monitoring after Resident 2 sustained a fall in the restroom on 6/9/2026.2. Conduct 72-hour psychosocial monitoring after Resident 1 alleged his arm was grabbed without his consent on 5/28/2026.These failures had the potential for undetected changes in Resident 2's physical or neurological (how the brain, spinal cord, and nerves work) status and Resident 1's psychosocial condition.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included ataxia (poor muscle control) following cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), generalized muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely physician notification for a significant change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to delay physician evaluation, timely medical intervention, and result in the deterioration of Resident 1's condition.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 12/19/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which the lungs are unable to provide enough oxygen to the body or remove carbon dioxide, occurring suddenly and/or over a long period of time), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), congestive heart failure (CHF- a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), acute pulmonary edema (a sudden buildup of fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the outside patio was safe and in functional condition when a nail stuck out from the water drain securement clip and the plastic tabletop was cracked and missing pieces. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to sustain injuries from the exposed nail and from the cracked plastic tabletop. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), and transient cerebral ischemic attack (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain). During a review of Resident 32's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/26/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 32 had the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent for psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) was obtained in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4). This deficient practice placed Resident 4 at risk for experiencing unexpected and/or unwanted adverse effects or complications of the medication, including increased cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgment, and make decisions), over sedation (excessive drowsiness, loss of response to verbal command, inappropriate movement, hearing abnormalities, visual disturbances, sweating, or nausea), and tardive dyskinesia (a chronic movement disorder that causes involuntary, repetitive movements in the body). Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within reach for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 75). This deficient practice removed Resident 33's and 75's ability to exercise their right to request assistance from staff and created the potential for accidents and/or delays in care. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/20/2025 at 8:43 a.m., in Resident 33's doorway, Resident 33 was observed sitting up in a wheelchair in her room, at the foot of her bed. Resident 33's call light was in her bed and not within her reach. During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 33's admitting diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and history of falling. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 5/4/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 33 had severe cognitive impairments (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information related to Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, a document that informs Medicare beneficiaries when their covered services are ending) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN, a document that informs beneficiaries about potential non-coverage for specific items or services and informs beneficiaries they may have to pay for the service out-of-pocket), to one of three sampled residents (Resident 98), who was self-responsible and had the capacity to understand and make decisions. This deficient practice removed Resident 98's right to file an appeal if he disagreed with the discontinued coverage, including rehabilitation services (i.e., physical therapy [the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods rather than by drugs or surgery]). Findings: During a review of Resident 98's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 98 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 98's admitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan (document that helps nurses and other team care members organize aspects of resident care) with interventions (actions a nurse takes to implement a care plan, intend to improve the resident's comfort and health) for two of two sampled residents' (Resident 10 and 68) use of side rails (short rails on one or both sides of the bed that can be used to assist in bed mobility). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 10 and 68 not receiving the necessary care to safely utilize the side rails. Cross Reference F700. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury ([TBI], a disruption in the normal function of the brain that can be caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head) and functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an interdisciplinary team (IDT) conference (a meeting to discuss the resident's plan of care, involving the IDT [physician, registered nurse, certified nursing assistant, dietary staff, the resident, and other pertinent staff]), and develop a care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 26) following a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 11/17/2024. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 26 to be involved in another resident-to-resident altercation. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 26 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 26's admitting diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), restlessness, agitation, Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and a personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of five sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 72) were provided with communication tools. This deficient practice placed Residents 11 and 72 at risk of not having their needs met and potentially negatively affecting their psychosocial needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 11's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 11 's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 11 could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 3/21/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents' (Resident 21) low air loss mattress ([LALM], a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a broad surface area to help prevent skin breakdown) was accurately set to Resident 21's weight. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the avoidable development of pressure ulcers ([PU], localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and the complications associated with impaired skin integrity. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition and could cause confusion and memory loss), cerebral infarction (a type of stroke that occurs when part of the brain does not get enough blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a hazard-free environment for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 87) by failing to ensure: 1. Staff responded timely to Resident 4's bed alarm. 2. Resident 4, who had a Wander Guard alarm (a security system designed to prevent residents from wandering outside of designated areas) did not exit the building unsupervised. 3. Resident 87 had a functioning bed alarm. These deficient practices placed Resident 4 and Resident 87 at risk for injuries related to unsafe wandering and/or falls. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 4's admitting diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and abnormalities of gait (walking pattern) and mobility. During a review of Resident 4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of side rails (short rails on one or both sides of the bed that can be used to assist in bed mobility) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 10 and 68) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 10 had grab bars (short side rails used to assist in bed mobility), instead of half side rails (longer side rails attached to the side of the bed, covering about half the length of the bed), were installed onto the bed. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 10 unable to optimally utilize the half side rails in turning and repositioning in bed. 2. Ensure Resident 68 had an order for grab bars. 3. Obtain informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) from Responsible Party (RP) 1, for Resident 68's grab bars, immediately upon Resident 68's readmission to the facility. These deficient practices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than five percent (%), when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 failed to administer two of five randomly selected residents' (Residents 28 and 66) medications in accordance with the physicians' orders. The outcome was two medication errors out of 30 opportunities for errors, which resulted in a Medication Administration Error Rate of 6.67%, based on the following: 1. LVN 3 did not administer Resident 28's metoprolol (medication to treat high blood pressure) with food. 2. LVN 3 did not administer Resident 66's aspirin (an antiplatelet medication used to prevent blood clots from forming) with food. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Residents 28 and 66 to experience stomach pain and discomfort. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 28 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 72) did not store medications at the bedside when: 1. Resident 72 had a medication bottle of Adderall (a stimulant that helps improve focus, attention, and impulse control in people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD, chronic condition including attention difficulty, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness]) at the bedside. 2. Resident 72 had a medication bottle of Atarax (medication for anxiety [a feeling of worriedness, dread, and uneasiness]) at the bedside. 3. Resident 72 had a medication bottle of Diovan (medication for high blood pressure [the force of blood pushing against the walls of the arteries is consistently too high]) at the bedside. These deficient practices placed Resident 72 at risk for potential medication error and potential adverse effects due to overdosing of medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record, the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food to meet individual needs for one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 19) by: 1. Not ensuring Resident 19 received a regular diet during mealtime. This deficient practice did not meet Residents 19's individual needs and placed resident 19 to feel unsatisfied with the meal. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 19's diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease (caused by persistently high blood pressure, causes chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, swelling in the legs or ankles, and palpitations) and malignant neoplasm (abnormal growth of cells that can spread to other parts of the body and cause harm) of the colon (longest part of the large intestine). During a review of Resident 19's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/25/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement (an agreement between the facility and the resident where they would resolve any disputes through a neutral person rather than going to court) was provided to and signed by an individual with decision making capacity for two of three sampled residents (Resident 104 and 105). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 104 and 105 being unaware that their right to resolve a dispute in court was waived after entering into the binding arbitration agreement. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 104's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place one of five sampled residents (Resident 253) on enhanced barrier precaution ([EBP], infection control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDRO] from staff to patient). This deficient practice had the potential to result in staff members, who provided direct care to Resident 253, transmitting MDRO and other bacteria to Resident 253 and other residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 253's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 253 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included infection of right lower extremity amputation stump (residual limb leftover after the removal of the body part) and dehiscence of closure of surgical wound (a surgical incision that opens after it has been closed, usually due to a problem with healing). During a review of Resident 253's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool), dated 5/3/2025, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure safe smoking practices were maintained for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 79). This deficient practice placed Resident 79 at risk for burn injuries and accidents related to unsupervised cigarette smoking, and placed all facility residents at risk due to the fire hazard associated with unsafe smoking practices. Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 79 was originally admitted on [DATE] and was most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 79's admitting diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, epilepsy (a brain condition characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness]), and tobacco use. During a review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/21/2025, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services for and monitor a resident with a pacemaker (a device that delivers electrical impulses to control the rhythm of the heart) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's pacemaker information (insertion date, paced rate, type of pacemaker, the name of the cardiologist, type of leads [an insulated wire that is connected to the pulse generator in the heart], manufacturer and model, and serial number) was obtained upon admission, as indicated in the facility's policy, Resident 1's pacemaker care plan, and physician orders. 2. Ensure effective and timely management of Resident 1's pacemaker and blood pressure medications were assessed and monitored when the facility could not obtain any information regarding Resident 1's assigned cardiologist and pacemaker details before and after Resident 1's two hospitalizations due to syncope (a brief loss of consciousness that occurs due to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not sleep at the nurses' station, use a cellular device while working, and ensure call lights were answered promptly for two out of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). These failures had the potential to make the residents feel less dignified and uncared for. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), and myasthenia gravis (a condition that causes weakness of the skeletal muscles). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/27/2024, the MDS indicated that Resident 2 ' s cognitive skills (mental action or process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Notify both designated emergency contacts listed on a resident ' s admission Record for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 suffered a fall, and was sent to the General Acute Gare Hospital (GACH). These findings resulted in Responsible Party (RP) 1 becoming upset that she was not notified and was unaware that her father fell, and was transported to the hospital. Findings: During an interview, 11/21/2024, at 10:52 a.m., RP 1 stated that she was informed that her father (Resident 1) had arrived back to the facility after being transported to the GACH. RP 1 stated that she was never informed that her father had fallen around 2:00 a.m. (on 11/21/2024) and was never informed that he was sent to the GACH. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, fracture of orbital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective infection prevention measures during a Coronavirus Disease outbreak ([COVID-19], an infectious disease that affects a person's organs and tissues that aid in breathing) in the facility. The facility failed to: 1. Minimize Resident 1's exposure to COVID-19. 2. Stock face shields in eight of eight isolation carts (storage unit for personal protective equipment [PPE, protective clothing or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from infection, such as a gown, gloves, mask, and face shield]) designated for the COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 exposed rooms. 3. Ensure face shields were used by staff members prior to entering Residents 2 and 3 rooms, who were COVID-19 positive. 4. Ensure Activities Assistant (AA) 1 doffed (took off) and disposed of the used PPE, inside Resident 3's room, who was COVID-19 positive. These failures resulted in Resident 1 being unnecessarily exposed and eventually contracted COVID-19 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete set of vital signs (a group of the four to six most crucial medical signs that indicate the status of the body's vital functions) were taken, documented, and monitored as ordered by the physician for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the care provided to Resident 1, who exhibited an acute episode of desaturation (respiratory distress) and tachycardia (fast heart rate). Resident 1 was sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) on 5/20/2024, and diagnosed with acute renal failure (occurs when your kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), hyperkalemia (elevated potassium [an electrolyte] in the blood) , and sepsis (an infection in the blood). Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered plan of care with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the residents' needs for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 74 and 78) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 74 was consistently turned and repositioned (during the month of March [2024]) as indicated on a pressure ulcer ([PU]-injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) care plan to prevent the development of an unstageable (full thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer. b. Develop and implement a care plan for Resident 78's multiple and consecutive RNA refusals. These deficient practices led to the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer on Resident 74's right medial lower leg and had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Residents 74 and 78. Findings: a. A review of Resident 74's admission Record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (meeting with a group of healthcare professionals with various areas of expertise who work together towards the goals of the residents) records were completed, organized, and readily accessible for three of three sampled residents (Resident 64, 78, and 194). These deficient practices resulted in staff being unaware where Resident 64, 78, and 194's medical records were located and had the potential to delay and negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: a. A review of Resident 194's admission Record (Face Sheet), Resident 194 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between brain and the surrounding membrane), end stage renal disease ([ESRD], a stage where the kidneys can no longer support the body's needs for waste removal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control procedures for one of six sampled residents (Resident 36) when the Restorative Nursing Aide 1 (RNA 1) did not clean and disinfect shared resident equipment, a front wheeled walker ([FWW] mobility device with two wheels in the front used for support when standing or walking), after resident use and before placing the FWW into the Utility Room with other clean equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of infection to facility staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: A review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted the resident on 12/10/2023 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, acquired absence of the left leg above the knee (amputation of the leg above the level of the knee), and ischemic heart disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels). During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0907 — pattern
    Provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the therapy mat (an adjustable padded surface used for therapy treatment) in the rehabilitation room was clear of miscellaneous items including a black bag, office supplies, a large black mat, a large therapy ball (large inflatable ball used for exercise), a graded rainbow arc (device used in therapy to assist with arm exercises), two bins containing multiple balls, a foam roller, a backpack, two large cardboard boxes, and four plastic bins containing various items to ensure adequate space was available for resident use during therapy treatments. This deficient practice had the potential to minimize equipment use and usable treatment space for residents during therapy. Findings: During an observation in the rehabilitation gym on 5/14/2024 at 12:49 p.m. during the recertification survey, a black bag, office supplies, a large black mat, a large therapy ball, a graded rainbow arc, two bins containing multiple balls, a foam roller, a backpack, two large cardboard boxes, and four plastic bins containing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to administration of psychotropics (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for three out of five residents (Resident 3, 48, and 149) by failing to: 1. Ensure an informed consent was obtained and signed by the responsible party (RP) of Resident 3 who could not make medical decisions for treatment with psychotropics. 2. Ensure Resident 48's verification signature was included on the informed consent for treatment with psychotropics. 3. Ensure Resident 149 had an informed consent for treatment with psychotropics. These failures placed Residents 3, 48, and 149 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects (a harmful and undesired effect resulting from a medication or intervention) related to psychotropic medication use and removed the Residents' rights to make decisions about the care and treatments they received in the facility. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 3's admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of three sampled residents (Resident 86) when the privacy curtain was left open while Resident 86 was left exposed (without any clothes on) in only their diaper. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 86 having a decreased feelings of self-worth and self-confidence and the potential for feelings of humiliation. Findings: A review of Resident 86's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but not limited to anoxic (a total depletion in the level of oxygen) brain damage, major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and benign prostatic hyperplasia ([BPH] age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty). A review of Resident 86's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable pressure ulcer (localized skin and soft tissue injuries that form as a result of prolonged pressure and shear, usually exerted over bony prominences) for one out of three residents (Resident 30). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 3 having a stage II pressure ulcer (an open wound with partial thickness loss where the top layer of the skin has been damaged). A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 30 on 3/12/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia (an infection of the lungs), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder where the pancreas cannot produce enough insulin to digest sugars properly, causing high blood sugar that damages organs over time if not controlled), sepsis (infection of the blood) due to streptococcus pneumoniae (a bacteria often the cause of pneumonia), and asthma (a respiratory condition marked by spasms in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall measures were implemented to prevent the occurrence of further falls and injuries for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 64 and Resident 194) who sustained major injuries after a fall within the facility when the facility staff failed to: 1. Ensure bilateral fall mats were in place for Resident 64. 2. Ensure a falling star sticker was placed to the name plates of Resident 64 and Resident 194. These failures had the potential for Resident 64, who had fallen on 4/10/2024, sustained a broken left hip and underwent an open reduction internal fixation ([ORIF]- surgery to repair the hip) of the left hip (because of the fall), to endure another fall. These failures also had the potential for Resident 194, who sustained a traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between brain and the surrounding membrane) due to a fall within the facility, to sustain further bodily injury from another fall. Findings: a. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services according to professional standards for Resident 30 by failing to: 1. Change Resident 30's oxygen tubing and humidifier (a device used to keep oxygen delivery moist to prevent irritation to the airway) within one (1) week according to facility policy and procedure. 2. Providing care/treatment/services to strengthen lungs due to history of recurring pneumonia (infection of the lungs). As a result of these deficient practices, Resident 30 had the potential to have a relapse in pneumonia. A review of Resident 30's admission Record, indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 30 on 3/12/2023 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 30's admitting diagnoses included but were not limited to: pneumonia (an infection of the lungs), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder where the pancreas cannot produce enough insulin to digest sugars properly, causing high blood sugar that damages organs over time if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure doors remained closed to residents' rooms that tested positive for COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory disease) for five of five sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, and Resident 10). This deficient practice had the potential to expose all residents, staff, and visitors to COVID-19. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, dated 4/2/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included COVID-19, muscle weakness, acute kidney failure (the sudden and rapid loss of kidney's ability to filter waste and balance fluid in blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus ( when your sugar is too high in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), and epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered care plan (document helps nurses and other team care members organize aspect of resident care) for three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 4, 5, and 7) by failing to: 1. Develop a care plan for Resident 4 who had a temperature of 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F, scale for measuring temperature, typical body temperature is between 97 degrees Fahrenheit to 99 degrees Fahrenheit), congestion (a buildup of mucus in the lungs and lower breathing tubes), body weakness, and was prescribed Levaquin (an antibiotic, which is a medication to treat bacterial infection) as treatment. 2. Develop a care plan for Resident 5 who had a temperature of 101.2 degrees F, a productive cough (a cough that produces mucus) and was prescribed Tamiflu (an antiviral, which is medication used to treat and prevent influenza [infection caused by a virus that affects the nose, throat, and lungs] and other viruses) as treatment. 3. Develop a care plan for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective infection prevention measures for four of 10 sampled residents (Resident 6, 7, 9, and 10) when the facility failed to: 1. Drape the privacy curtain between Resident 6 and Resident 9, and drape the privacy curtain between Resident 7 and Resident 10, who were all on droplet precautions (used to prevent the spread of pathogens that are passed through respiratory secretions). 2. Ensure the Activities Assistant (AA) 1 performed hand hygiene (a way of cleaning one ' s hands that substantially reduces the potential germs on the hands) prior to entering and upon exiting a droplet precaution room. These failures had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for the residents. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 6 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals with various areas of expertise who work together towards the goals of the residents) met for an IDT meeting (meeting to coordinate care and document communication between all members of the team related to residents ' plan of care and treatment goal) after a physical altercation took place between two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the provision of care and services for Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to Parkinson ' s disease (progressive neurological disease characterized by a fixed inexpressive face, tremor at rest, slowing of voluntary movements), type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for one of three sample residents (Resident 1) by failing to 1.Develop an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for Resident 1 with extensive assistance daily care. 2. Develop an intervention in a mobility care plan. This deficient practice had a potential to result in inconsistent implementation of the care plan that may lead to a delay in or lack of delivery of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included muscle weakness (full effort doesn't produce a normal muscle contraction or movement), difficult walking (problems with the joints, bones, circulation, or even pain can make it difficult to walk properly), Osteoporosis without current pathological fractures (a condition of reduced bone mass, with decreased cortical thickness and a decrease in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's staff failed to adhere to resident's plan of care to notify the physician when the resident's abnormal heart rate and blood pressure for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 23). Resident 23's heart rate and blood pressure were low with 66 episodes of low blood pressure (hypotension) and 26 episodes of low heart rate (bradycardia) for 60 days and there were no documented evidence the physician was notified of the resident's change of condition (COC). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 23 experiencing a COC and required the physician to be notified and medications reevaluated and had the potential for the resident to experience dizziness, weakness, tiredness, fainting and shortness of breath which could have rsulted in an emergency situation. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was implemented to ensure resident's needs could be met and the call light was accesible for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 80). Resident 80's left arm was impaired, and the call light was observed dangling from the left side of the bed and was not accessible to her. This deficient practice create a safety concern and had the potential to result in a delay in care or inability for the resident to obtain the necessary care and services timely. Findings: During an observation on 3/14/2022, at 10:26 a.m., while in the resident's room, Resident 80 was observed on her back in bed with the head of bed elevated at 45 degrees. Resident 80 had an arm sling (a device to limit movement of the shoulder, arm, or elbow while it heals) to the left upper extremity. The call light was dangling off the bed out of reach of the resident. Resident 80 was unable to grab the call light due to left arm restrictions. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a black box medication warning (strictest warning put in the labeling of prescription drugs or drug products by the Food and Drug Administration [FDA, a government agency responsible for protecting the public health]) when there is reasonable evidence of an association of a serious hazard with the drug) care plan for Resident 23 that met professional standards of care for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 23). Residents 23 did not have a care plan for Amiodarone (medication used for irregular heart rhythms [antiarrhythmic]), a black box warning medication for over 180 days. This deficient practice had the potential for the staff to be unaware of Resident 23's side effects of Amiodarone, such as life-threatening arrhythmias (an irregular heartbeat), painful breathing, cough, dizziness, lightheadedness, fainting and or fever which could have required an emergency evaluation and treatments. Findings: During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's staff failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services as per the care plan for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 23). Resident 23's plan of care stipulated the resident's blood pressure and/or heart would be monitored and any abnormal results would be reported to the physician, but nurses failed to notify the physician for 60 days. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 23 experiencing 66 episodes of hypotension (low blood pressure) and 26 episodes of bradycardia (low heart rate) for 60 days, which had the potential for Resident 23 to experience dizziness, weakness, tiredness, fainting and shortness of breath. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 23's diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease (heart conditions caused by high blood pressure), cardiomyopathy (heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 10) room was free from cluttered to prevent accidents. Resident 10, who uses devices for mobility, room was cluttered with many items which included personal items on the bed and surrounding space. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an accident with injuries that could negatively impact the resident's safety and wellbeing. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility on 3/14/2022 at 9:30 a.m., while in , Resident 10's room, the resident was seated in her wheelchair with a movable side table in front of her. The room was clutter with things such as a front wheel walker was behind her stacked with towels and gowns, a large pile of personal belongings were scattered on the resident's bed which included incontinence pads, electronic items, books/reading materials, large amount of clothing and cloth hangers, a large pink case, plastic bags of unidentified items and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents with urinary catheters (a flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder into a drainage bag) receive the necessary care and services for two of 11 residents (Residents 81 and 239). The staff failed to adhere to the resident's plan of care and facility's policy and procedure to prevent kinking and dislodgement (to remove or force out from a position or dwelling previously occupied) by not using catheter straps. This deficient practice had the potential to cause pain, urinary blockage, bleeding and impede progress of the residents wellness. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/16/2022 at 8:30 a.m. with a registered nurse (RN 1) while in Resident 81's room, Resident 81 was sitting in a wheelchair wearing short pants and the urinary catheter strap was visible on the right thigh and the catheter tubing was free hanging on the left thigh. The urinary catheter tubing was not secured in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to observe infection control measures by failing to: 1. Ensure certified nurse assistant (CNA 3) performed hand hygiene before and after resident care for one of 19 sampled residents. 2. Ensure the housekeeping staff (HK 1) donned (put on) a gown while cleaning a contact precaution (measures that are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agent which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment) isolation room for one of one sampled room. These deficient practices were a safety concern and had the potential to result in transmission of infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of exposure to infection for the residents and staff. Findings: a. During an observation on 3/14/2022, at 10:02 a.m., certified nurse assistant (CNA 3) assist Resident 78 by removing her pants. Resident 78 's roommate, Resident 65, was calling out for help. CNA 3 removed her gloves and donned (put on) new gloves, no hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 10) room was free from cluttered and was a safe environment. Resident 10, who uses devices for mobility, room was cluttered with many items which included personal items on the bed and surrounding space (crossed reference to F689). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 10's room being an unsafe, uncomfortable and dysfunctional area and had the potential to result in an accident. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility on 3/14/2022 at 9:30 a.m., while in , Resident 10's room, the resident was seated in her wheelchair with a movable side table in front of her. The room was clutter with things such as a front wheel walker was behind her stacked with towels and gowns, a large pile of personal belongings were scattered on the resident's bed which included incontinence pads, electronic items, books/reading materials, large amount of clothing and cloth hangers, a large pink case,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEHMANN, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST31%since 01/01/2022
BAK, ABRAHAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/17/2014
GASTWIRTH, MENACHEMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/17/2014
ABAK CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/27/2021
MGAZ CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/27/2021
CURIEL, YAMILETTEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
MAYER, HELENEIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
COATS, MELVINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 27%Other / private 7%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$386per resident / day
operating cost
$11,726per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$449per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next