No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beachside Post Acute

22520 Maple Avenue, Torrance, CA 90505 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (310) 326-9131 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (310) 326-9131 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3220 Sepulveda Blvd · (310) 326-8625 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2976 Sepulveda Blvd · (310) 534-0078 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3030 Sepulveda Blvd · (310) 539-8899 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.0%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.1%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.102.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.111.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 162 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.5%CMS range 27.5–39.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 9.1–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge80.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.2–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.411.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.52
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.61
RN hoursweekends
31.8%
Total nursing turnover
26.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 104.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-19)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen dishwasher temperature gauge was functioning properly. This failure had the potential to expose residents to dishes washed at unsafe temperatures, which could promote bacterial growth and increase the risk of foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins )Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/2025 at 9:03 a.m. in the kitchen with Dietary Aide (DA 1), a low-temperature dishwasher was observed being used to wash dishes. DA 1 stated the wash temperature gauge displayed 120 degrees Fahrenheit ( F- unit of temperature). However, a photo taken of the gauge at that time showed the temperature reading was 95 F. During an interview on 12/17/2025 at 1:16 p.m. in the kitchen with Dietary Aide (DA 2), DA 2 ran a dishwasher cycle and stated the temperature gauge displayed 110 F. DA 2 further stated that the temperature gauge had not been working since 12/15/2025. During an interview on 12/19/2025 at 11:25 a.m. with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor range of motion (ROM-the full movement potential of a joint) for four of nine sampled residents (Residents 58, 15, 38, and 52) who had or were at risk for limited ROM and mobility. The facility failed to:1.Ensure Resident 58 received two quarterly Joint Mobility Screens (JMS-a brief assessment of ROM in both arms and legs) in 5/2025 and 8/2025.2.Ensure Resident 15 received a quarterly JMS in 7/ 2025.3.Ensure Resident 38 received a quarterly JMS in 7/2025.4.Ensure Resident 52 received a quarterly JMS in 5/2025.These failures had the potential for Residents 58, 15, 38, and 52 to develop further ROM limitations in the arms and legs due to the lack of monitoring.1. During a review of Resident 58's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 58 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body) and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 113) was assessed, and that the physician was notified when Resident 113 experienced a significant change of condition (COC- a decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff) of low blood pressure. This failure resulted in Resident 113's low blood pressure going unnoticed by licensed staff, placing the resident at risk for adverse outcomes.Findings:During a review of Resident 113's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 113 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), heart failure (heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 18) by not addressing Resident 18's toenail fungus (a fungal infection below the surface of the nail) in the care plan.This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 18.Findings:During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 11/6/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 18's cognition (ability to think, learn, and remember) was severely impaired and Resident 18 required maximum (helper does more than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a change of condition ([COC] a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) process for one of four sampled residents (Resident 106), when Resident 106 reported pain in his left shoulder.This failure had the potential for Resident 106's pain to remain uncontrolled, affecting comfort and quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 106's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 106's History & Physical (H&P) dated 8/22/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 106 was alert and oriented.During a review of Resident 106's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 84 and 113) were free from significant medication errors. The facility failed to:1.Ensure Resident 84's lidocaine patch (a medication used for localized pain relief) was removed at the scheduled time.This failure had the potential to expose Resident 84 to prolonged medication absorption and increase the risk of adverse reactions, which could lead to a decline in the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living.2.Ensure Resident 113 did not receive medication for heart failure when the resident's systolic blood pressure was less than 110 millimeters per mercury (mmHg-unit of pressure), as required by the physician's order to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was below 110 mmHg.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 113 to experience adverse effects such as weakness, dizziness, fainting, lightheadedness, blurred vision, nausea, and difficulty concentrating. Findings: During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the two dryers' gas hoses connected to the gas line were intact and free from leaks.This failure had the potential to increase the risk of fire or carbon monoxide exposure to residents which could result in injury or harm. Findings:a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/2025 at 10:45 a.m. with Laundry Aid (LA) 1 in the laundry room, the laundry room had a strong pungent distinct odor. LA 1 stated she did not smell any odor that was different from any other chemicals used for laundering. LA 1 stated if a gas leak was suspected, she would stop the dryers, turn off the gas supply and report it to the maintenance supervisor.During an interview on 12/17/2025 at 10:45 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM)in the laundry room, the ADM stated she smelled a slight odor like gas in the laundry room.During an interview on 12/17/2025 at 12:20 p.m. with the ADM, the ADM stated the gas company was contacted and found minimal leaks in three different areas of the hoses connected to the dryers prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy when they did not report an unusual occurrence of an acute new distal femur fracture (a break in the lower part of the thighbone, near the knee joint) of unknown cause to the State Survey Agency (California Department of Public Health - CDPH) within 24 hours of the occurrence, for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for resident harm and/or death, due to CDPH ' s inability to promptly investigate the possibility of resident abuse in the facility. This delayed CDPH response to ensure Resident 1 was safe and free from possible abuse and/or mistreatment in the facility and had the potential for other unusual occurrences to go unreported. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), dated 5/19/2025, the admission Record indicated, the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 2/28/2024, then re-admitted Resident 1 on 5/8/2025, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff including the dietary supervisor assistant (DSA) and dietary aide (DA 1) were competent regarding their food thawing policies. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure and placed 99 out of 106 total residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps (a type of abdominal pain that feel like contractions and can vary in intensity, nausea (a feeling of sickness or discomfort in the stomach that may come with an urge to vomit), vomiting (stomach pain with urge to expel contents through the mouth) , diarrhea (Loose, watery stools that occur more frequently than usual), and fever (elevated body temperature indicating illness) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During an observation on 10/30/2024 at 11:02 a.m., there was a box of frozen chicken sitting by the food preparation sink in the kitchen, the chicken appeared to have soft pliable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope [a scientific magnifying device]) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated [something that has been made impure or unfit for use by contact with something harmful] food for 99 out 106 total residents in the facility by not ensuring: a.Cottage cheese in the reach-in refrigerator was not past the use by date. b.The temperature log for the walk-in refrigerator was filled out twice daily c. Food such as raw chicken and frozen waffles were not thawed and then returned to the freezer. d.Proper thawing techniques by not having running water over thawing chicken in the sink. e.The facility ice machine was maintained in a clean and sanitary way. f. There was a cleaning log kept for the upper portion of the ice machine. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (an organism that can cause illness)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were complete and accurately documented by: a. failing to ensure the documentation for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 84) related to Resident 84's intravenous (IV, administered into a vein) access and IV fluids (liquids that are injected into a vein to prevent or treat dehydration [occurs when the body loses more fluids than it takes in]) was accurate. This deficient practice had the potential to reflect inaccurate hydration for Resident 84 b.failing to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 49) with limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and mobility (ability to move) concerns had complete clinical records for the provision of Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services. This failure resulted in Resident 49's records being incomplete regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures by failing to: A. Ensure Resident 260's visitor was wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 and LVN 3 were doffing (removing PPE in a way that avoids self-contamination) PPE properly without self-contamination after caring for Resident 260 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms). B. Ensure LVN 1, LVN 4, and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 were wearing proper PPE during the care of Resident 8 who was on EBP. C. Ensure the duct tape (a water resistant tape that is not waterproof and will eventually break down and allow water to pass) placed on 4 out of 22 sampled resident's (Resident 16, Resident 54, Resident 59, and Resident 84) beds' padded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light device was within reach for one of five sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 8 from receiving the necessary care and services timely. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 8 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the last readmission was on 9/20/2024 with diagnoses including left leg above knee amputation (surgical removal of the portion of the left leg above the knee joint), muscle weakness, dependence on supplemental oxygen (a colorless, odorless gas element that sustains life), and pressure ulcer/injury (damage to skin and tissue underneath the skin caused by unrelieved pressure) stage 3 (Full-thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) of sacral region (the portion of the spine between lower back and tailbone). During a review of Resident 8's History and Physical (H&P),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) in both legs for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 49) with limited range of motion and mobility (ability to move) by failing to perform an annual Joint Mobility Screen ([JMS] brief assessment of a resident's range of motion in both arms and both legs) on 4/18/2024 in accordance with the facility's policy titled, Resident Mobility and Range of Motion. This failure had the potential for Resident 49 to develop further ROM limitations in both legs due to the lack of monitoring for potentially 21 months from Resident 49's Physical Therapy ([PT] profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) discharge on [DATE] to 4/2025 (next annual JMS). Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 49 on 12/11/2019 and re-admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide prompt dental services after dentures were lost on 9/10/24 and provide documentation of what they did to ensure resident could still eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services for one of two sample residents (Resident 30). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 30 not being able to eat the mechanical soft diet without the dentures until replacement was delivered on 10/31/24. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility under Hospice (that provides medical, emotional, and spiritual support for people who are terminally ill and nearing the end of their life) on 8/2/2024 with diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), anxiety disorder (a group of mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 30) received food according to her preferences. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 30 not eating her preferred diet potentially resulting in decrease meal intake, weight loss, and malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not eating enough). Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility under a Hospice (an agency that provides medical, emotional, and spiritual support for people who are terminally ill and nearing the end of their life) agency on 8/2/2024 with diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 sustained a moderately displaced (a break in the bone where the bones does not always crack all the way through) fracture (a break in the bone) of the distal (farther end) diaphysis (shaft; or a long tubular structure of the bone) of the femur (thigh bone). This deficient practice resulted in the inability of CDPH to investigate Resident 1 ' s injury of femur fracture in a timely manner and had the potential for facts related to the injury to be forgotten by staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face sheet), the Face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain leading to the person to be confused), dementia (a condition of loss of cognitive functioning such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was investigated for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 sustained a moderately displaced (a break in the bone where the bones does not always crack all the way through) fracture (a break in the bone) of the distal (farther end) diaphysis (shaft; or a long tubular structure of the bone) of the femur (thigh bone) and the cause of the fracture was unknown to the resident and staff. This deficient practice resulted in the inability of the facility to determine what might have been the cause of Resident 1 ' s injury and had the potential to recur. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face sheet), the Face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain leading to the person to be confused), dementia (a condition of loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and document belongings brought by the family on the inventory list for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, 4, 5). This failure resulted in residents losing items due to not having them written down on the inventory list. Findings: a. During a record review of Resident 1 Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypertensive heart (chronic blood pressure elevation) and chronic kidney disease (CKD: gradual loss of the kidney function), history of falling, and dementia (impaired ability to think, make decisions) with other behavioral disturbance (verbal and physical aggression, wandering). During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized assessment and care screening tool], dated 1/10/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive skills (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to handle and store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food) for 99 out of 99 total residents in the facility by failure to: 1. Ensure enriched Farina hot wheat cereal have a received date label. 2 Ensure Dietary Aide (DA) 1, DA 2, DA 3, DA 4 and [NAME] 2 did hand hygiene (hand washing ) and don gloves when handling food during the tray line (a process of preparing and setting food for the residents in the facility). 3 Ensure ice machine maker door lining was kept clean. 4 Ensure freezer thermometer was calibrated and in working condition. These failures had the potential for growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a dignity or privacy bag (a urinary drainage bag holder that restores the dignity of catheterized [insertion of a tube into the bladder to allow urine to drain for collection] residents by covering urinary drainage bags from the public view) for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 307) indwelling catheter (a tube that drains urine from the body into a bag outside the body). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 307's low self-esteem and privacy being violated. Findings: During a review of Resident 307's admission Record (Face Sheet ), indicated Resident 307 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including acute kidney failure (a medical condition in which the kidneys can no longer adequately filter waste products from the blood), urine retention (the inability to completely empty the bladder), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (a noncancerous increase in size of the prostate gland (a gland of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled resident (Resident 256) responsible party (RP) was notified when the hemoglobin (a red protein responsible for transporting oxygen in the blood) dropped significantly to 7.3 grams/deciliter (g/dcl-normal levels 11.6-15) This failure violated the Resident 256's rights of notification of responsible parties of the care services provided and had the potential to result in a lack of proper care and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 256's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 256 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including iron deficiency anemia (a condition in which blood lacks adequate healthy red blood cells), falls, and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). During a review of Resident 256's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 11/19/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 256 was severely cognitively impaired (a person who has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (a resident-specific plan with defined clinical goals and interventions used to manage identified medical issues or other areas of concern) regarding the use of Depakote (a medication used to treat mood problems) to treat a behavioral problem of sudden outbursts of anger in one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 74.) This failure to develop and implement a care plan with measurable objectives for the use of Depakote may result in not meeting Resident 74's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs to maintain or attain Resident 74's highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the facility originally on 7/1/23 with diagnosis including unspecified dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities) with other behavioral disturbance. During a review of Resident 74's Order Summary Report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident received radiation treatments (cancer treatment that uses radiation (usually high-powered X-rays) to kill cancer cells.) for basal cell carcinoma (type of skin cancer) of the left eye for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 48) by: 1.Failing to send Resident 48 to the correct outpatient department for a scheduled radiation treatment on 11/22/2023. 2.Failing to provide transportation for an outpatient scheduled radiation treatment on 11/27/2023. These failures resulted in a delay of services/treatments and the potential for Resident 48 to be exposed to radiotoxicity for back-to-back radiation treatments. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), basal cell carcinoma of the skin, and impaired vision of the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on one recommendation from the consultant pharmacist (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) from 10/5/23 regarding lowering of the dose of esomeprazole (a medication used to treat stomach acid problems) from twice daily to once daily in one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 74.) This failure of failing to respond to recommendations from the consultant pharmacist could have resulted in Resident 74 receiving a higher than necessary dose of esomeprazole possibly resulting in medication side effects (a secondary, typically undesirable effect of a drug or medical treatment). Findings: During a review of Medication Regimen Review (MRR - a monthly evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication), dated 10/5/23, the review indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one expired fluticasone/salmeterol (a medication used to treat breathing problems) inhaler for Resident 22, was removed from the medication cart in one of two inspected medication carts (Medication Cart 2.) This failure could have resulted in Resident 22 experiencing preventable episodes of shortness of breath and troubled breathing possibly leading to hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung disease that causes restricted airflow from the lungs and breathing problems). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/23 at 1:42 p.m. of Medication Cart 2 with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, the following medication was found expired: 1.One opened fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler device for Resident 22, with opened date of 10/25/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor food preference of one of two sampled residents (Resident 356) by ensuring vegetables are not overcooked. This failure had the potential for Resident 356 to not receive their nutritional needs and food preferences. Findings: During a review of Resident 356's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 356 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular and often rapid heartbeat that can cause poor blood flow), difficulty in walking, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) and diabetes (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly). During a review of Resident 356's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/20/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 356 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures on two of six sampled residents (Resident 27 and Resident 43) when Certified Nursing Assistant 3 placed a plastic bag with soiled linens on the fall mat (cushioning pad placed on the floor along the side of the bed that can reduce injury due to fall) of Resident 43 while providing care to the residents. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and place residents at risk for infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated the Resident 27 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning which can affect and interfere with daily life and activities), and unspecified osteoarthritis (wearing down of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program (measures used by the facility to ensure antibiotics [drug to treat infection] are used only when necessary and appropriate) on one of two sampled residents (Resident 26) by prescribing an antibiotic without meeting the criteria of their protocol (checklist or guide to initiate antibiotic) for urinary tract infection([UTI] infection in the urine). This failure had the potential to put Resident 26 at risk for antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) and inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia ( mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves), transient ischemic attack(occurs when the blood supply to a part of the brain is briefly interrupted), benign prostatic hyperplasia ([BPH] enlarged prostate) and acute kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when in need) was answered in a timely manner and helped in toileting by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's physical comfort and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis ( a joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), heart failure (is a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), and edema (swelling caused by fluid trapped in your body's tissues). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 11/3/23, indicated Resident 1 had ability to makes self-understood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Polymerase Chain Reaction ([PCR] a test used to detect the smallest amount of COVID-19 (a potentially severe respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus and characterized by fever, coughing, and shortness of breath [SOB]) test was conducted to confirm negative COVID-19 test results obtained via a Point of Care Antigen test ([Antigen] a rapid test that quickly detects the presence or absence of an antigen [a foreign substance] but is less accurate than a PCR test) test, when one out of two sampled residents (Residents 1) continued to exhibit signs and symptoms (s/s) of COVID-19, after his Antigen COVID-19 test results were negative. As a result of this deficient practice Resident 1 tested positive 10 days after his initial (9/1/2023) Antigen test result was negative and continued to exhibit s/s of COVID-19 the entire 10 days prior to being positive for COVID-19, potentially spreading the COVID-19 virus throughout the facility and placing other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.5+2.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEHMANN, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF32%since 04/09/2019
BAK, ABRAHAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2019
GASTWIRTH, MENACHEMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2019
MUTTALIB, AZHARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
PANGILINAN, VIOLETAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
ABAK CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
CREST-VEST CORPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/11/2019
MGAZ CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
GEWIRTZ, CHONOCHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 25%Other / private 3%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$392per resident / day
operating cost
$11,918per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$440per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055531. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next