No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

EDEN SENIOR CARE

Ownership rollup across 21 nursing homes in 3 states: Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.6 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 0.4 stars below the ~3.0 average of the 3 states it operates in. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It is improving: across the same 21 homes rated throughout, the average rose 0.62 stars between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

21
Homes in this chain
2,039
Certified beds97 per home on average
70%
Occupied1,422 residents a day across 2,039 beds
+0.62
Star changeacross the 21 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
3
States covered
2.6
Average CMS rating~3.0 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.5 of 521 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing3.1 of 521 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures3.3 of 521 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

8 with immediate-jeopardy citations1 Special-Focus candidates2 with an abuse flag10 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$18.0M
Related-party expensesummed across 21 homes · FY2023–2024 cost reports
10%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 21 homes reporting both figures
-2.6%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 21 homes with a cost report
$1.1M
Total federal fines10 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 74%Medicare 6%Other / private 20%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 21 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Edenbrook On Second AveKingston, PA 1 of 5
Edenbrook LakesideMilwaukee, WI 1 of 53 immediate-jeopardy $138,434 fined
Edenbrook SheboyganSheboygan, WI 1 of 53 immediate-jeopardy $345,576 fined
Evansville Manor Nursing And Rehab, LLCEvansville, WI 1 of 54 immediate-jeopardy SFF candidate Abuse flag $182,024 fined
Edenbrook Of RochesterRochester, MN 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $53,260 fined
Edenbrook Rochester WestRochester, MN 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $14,518 fined
Fair Oaks LodgeWadena, MN 2 of 5$27,047 fined
Edenbrook NorthWilliamsport, PA 2 of 5$305,250 fined
Edenbrook Of YeadonYeadon, PA 2 of 52 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $34,298 fined
Edenbrook of Appleton NorthAppleton, WI 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
Edenbrook Of EdinaMinneapolis, MN 3 of 5
Edenbrook Of St CloudSaint Cloud, MN 3 of 5
Edenbrook At HamptonWilkes Barre, PA 3 of 5
Edenbrook of Green BayGreen Bay, WI 3 of 5
Edenbrook of OshkoshOshkosh, WI 3 of 5
Whispering Pines Nursing and Rehab, LLCRipon, WI 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $12,649 fined
Edenbrook OmroOmro, WI 4 of 5
Edenbrook of Fond Du LacFond du Lac, WI 4 of 5$9,113 fined
Edenbrook of PlattevillePlatteville, WI 4 of 5
Edenbrook of Wisconsin RapidsWisconsin Rapids, WI 4 of 5
Friendly Village Nursing And Rehab CenterRhinelander, WI 5 of 5
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.