No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edenbrook of Oshkosh

1850 Bowen St, Oshkosh, WI 54901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (920) 233-4011 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (920) 233-4011 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Jul 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
414 Doctors Ct · (920) 303-5100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
414 Doctors Ct Ste 100 · (920) 303-5006 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
525 E Murdock Ave
Park
551 Pratt Trl · (920) 236-5082 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1100 E Murdock Ave · (920) 235-6616

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.9%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.3%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.8%18.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%16.9%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.3%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.1%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.2%82.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%23.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%15.5%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.8%CMS range 33.1–54.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 8.6–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.4–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
59.8%
Total nursing turnover
47.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 65.6 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-05)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 residents (R) (R1, R18, R53, and R41) of 4 sampled residents received the necessary care and services to prevent pressuries injuries from developing or worsening and/or promote healing.R1 was admitted to the facility with stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. During wound care, Registered Nurse (RN)-H applied ointment to the wound bed of R1's stage 4 left buttock pressure injury with a soiled glove.R18's specialty air mattress was not turned on during an observation on 5/3/26. In addition, R18 did not have an order for the mattress and the setting wasn't indicated in R18's medical record. R53 and R41's specialty air mattresses were not set correctly.Finding include: The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention and Wound Care Management policy and procedure, revised 8/25/25, indicates: .A resident who has a pressure injury will receive care and services to promote healing and prevent additional ulcers .Air mattress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen was accurately completed and a Level II Screen was completed for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 7 sampled residents.R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder and was prescribed antianxiety medication. The facility did not correctly identify R8's mental illness diagnoses or medication on a PASRR Level I Screen and did not submit for a Level II Screen.Findings include:From 5/3/26 to 5/5/26, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/16/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 which indicated R8 had moderate cognitive impairment. R8 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) to assist with healthcare decisions.R8's PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their bowel protocol was followed or daily weights were obtained for 2 residents (R) (R30 and R15) of 2 sampled residents.R30 went 4 days without a bowel movement. R30 was not offered medication to help promote a bowel movement on day 3 per facility protocol. R15 was not weighed daily in accordance with a physician's order.Findings include: The facility's standing orders include: ~ Milk of Magnesia (MOM) 30 milliliters (ml) by mouth as needed (PRN) on third day without bowel movement (BM) except in renal failure or with glomerula filtration rate (GFR) of less than 45 ~ Senna-docusate sodium tablet 8.6-50 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for constipation and/or if no bowel movement in 3 days ~ Fleet enema as needed for constipation if no results from the suppository ~ Maalox 15-30 ml every 2 hours as needed for gastrointestinal (GI) distress 1. Between 5/3/26 and 5/5/26, Surveyor reviewed R30's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R7 and R1) of 3 sampled residents received appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs).The facility did not ensure R7 and R1 received catheter care in a manner that decreased the risk for infection. R7's catheter bag and tubing were on the floor on multiple occasions. R1's uncovered catheter bag was also on the floor. Findings include: The facility's Policy & Procedure Catheter Care, revised 1/28/25, indicates: Staff will maintain consistent and adequate hygiene standards for residents with an indwelling catheter in order to maintain comfort, function, and prevent infection and other complications. 1. On 5/3/26, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes with other circulatory complications, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and urinary tract infection (UTI) (dated 3/24/26). R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/2/26, had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 resident (R) (R15) of 6 sampled residents. R15 did not receive gabapentin (an anticonvulsant medication often used to treat pain) in a timely manner. In addition, R15 did not receive the correct dose on 5/1/26 after the physician changed the order on 4/30/26.Findings include: The facility's Liberalized Medication Administration Policy, revised 2/12/24, indicates: Medications should be administered at appropriate times per pharmacy regulation. Medications ordered at prescribed times will be given as ordered. Between 5/3/26 and 5/5/26, Surveyor reviewed R15's medical record. R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including neuropathy, chronic pain of both knees, and status post total right knee replacement. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Food was not sealed, labeled, or dated appropriately.Food temperatures were not consistently documented prior to meal service.Kitchen cookware was not stored properly. In addition, kitchen equipment and the floor were not in clean condition. The rehab unit refrigerator was not in clean condition and contained undated and expired resident food.Staff touched ready-to-eat food with soiled gloves during lunch service.Findings include:On 11/25/25 at 8:39 AM, Surveyor completed a kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM)-C who indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code.Labeling/Dating/Storage:The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking: (A) Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure meals were served timely. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 72 residents residing in the facility.On 11/25/25, the lunch meal was served late.Findings include:The posted meal times on the meal service line for lunch were: Hall 4: 11:30 AM - start by 11:10 AM; Hall 2: 11:40 AM - start by 11:30 AM; Hall 1: 11:50 AM - start by 11:35 AM; Dining Room: 12:05 PM - start by 11:55 AM.On 11/25/25 at 11:00, Surveyor entered the kitchen to watch lunch service and noted the Hall 4 meal service started at 11:45 AM. The Hall 4 lunch service cart was completed and sent to the unit at 12:00 PM. On 11/25/25 at 12:00 PM, Surveyor heard Dietary Manager (DM)-C tell staff to move along because meal service was late. On 11/25/25 at 12:07 PM, Surveyor noted the Hall 2 meal service started but should have started at 11:40 AM. Surveyor followed the Hall 2 cart to the unit which was completed and sent to the unit at 12:30 PM.On 11/25/25 at 12:43 PM, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide meals according to prescribed diets for 3 residents (R) (R9, R10, and R11) of 3 sampled residents. R9, R10, and R11 had orders for a consistent carbohydrate diet. On 11/25/25, residents on consistent carbohydrate diets were supposed to receive a half slice of garlic toast. R9, R10, and R11 received a full slice of garlic toast.Findings include:The facility's Diet and Diet Orders policy, revised 12/11/23, indicates: .11. Residents on therapeutic or mechanically-altered diets will not receive food or fluids outside the diet order unless approved by the attending physician in conjunction with the dietitian, nursing, and/or therapy. On 11/25/25, Surveyor reviewed R9's medical record. R9 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and was prescribed a consistent carbohydrate (diabetic) diet.On 11/25/25, Surveyor reviewed R10's medical record. R10 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and was prescribed a consistent carbohydrate with no added salt diet.On 11/25/25, Surveyor reviewed R11's medical record. R11 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R2 and R9) of 3 sampled residents received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs). The facility did not initiate or transcribe an admission order to change R2's Foley catheter monthly and as needed.The facility did not initiate or transcribe a urology clinic order to change R9's Foley catheter monthly and as needed. In addition, R9 was not placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) despite having an indwelling medical device.Findings include:The facility's Physician Orders policy, revised 11/13/24, indicates orders must be recorded in the medical record and transcribed to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The facility's Foley Catheter Management policy, revised 1/28/25, indicates there will be a medical necessity/justification for the use of a urinary catheter which will be identified by the physician order.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R2) of 1 sampled resident received timely laboratory services. The facility did not complete physician orders for R2 to prevent potential cancellation or delay of a medical procedure. Findings include: The facility's Physician Orders policy, revised 11/13/24, indicates the purpose of the policy is to ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards. The policy also indicates orders must be recorded in the medical record and transcribed to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR). On 7/29/25, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, traumatic ischemia/rhabdomyolysis, history of falls, and sick sinus syndrome. R2 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) who assisted with medical decisions. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of neglect was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 15 sampled residents. R2 alleged that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-H left R2 naked and without a gown on the 6/18/25 night shift. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of neglect.Findings include: The facility's Policy & Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention, revised 3/25/25, indicates: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse and timely and thoroughly investigate allegations .residents and staff will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility. There is zero tolerance for abuse or harm of any type .The facility will strive to educate all participants in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe manner. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 71 residents residing in the facility. Holding temperatures were not completed for all items served. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour on 3/24/25 at 9:08 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-I indicated the facility follows the State of Wisconsin Food Code. The facility's Hospitality and Dining Services (Accuracy and Quality of Food Service 1-8) policy, dated 1/1/20, indicates: .Hot foods will be kept hot (>135 degrees Fahrenheit (F)) and cold foods will be kept cold (<41 degrees F) prior to and during service. Cooking of hot foods should be completed no more than 30 minutes prior to meal service. The Wisconsin State Food Code documents at 3-501.16, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding: (A) .Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained: (1) 135 degrees F or above, except that roasts cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in paragraph…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 5 residents (R) (R121, R124, R127, R58, and R19) of 6 sampled residents observed during medication administration and the provision of care. During observations of medication administration and/or care for R121, R124, R127, and R58, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D did not complete appropriate hand hygiene. Staff did not abide by enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when providing catheter care for R19. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control Program, revised 5/8/24, indicates: The infection control program exists to ensure a safe and comfortable environment for residents and personnel. It is designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection .Preventing Spread of Infections: The facility must require staff to clean their hands after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents and their representatives (R) (R1 and R6) of 20 sampled residents were informed of care conferences. R1 and R6's representatives were not informed of R1 and R6's care conferences. Findings include: The facility's Care Conference Policy, revised 6/20/23, indicates: .To provide interdisciplinary communication with the resident and/or their legal representative for purposes of the development of an individualized comprehensive plan of care .2. A calendar of resident conferences shall be distributed to the interdisciplinary team. 3. The resident and/or their responsible party will receive communication in advance of the scheduled care conference .7. The Care Conference UDA .should be completed for attendance for tracing and record of discussion. 1. From 3/24/25 to 3/26/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 received Hospice services and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure written notification for a roommate was provided for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 2 sampled residents. R6 received a roommate on 3/20/25. R6's representative was not notified prior to the move. Findings include: The facility's Room Change policy, revised 3/17/23, indicates: The facility will move the resident and their belongings safely and with the least possible confusion for the resident. The resident's preferences should be considered when making a room or roommate change. Whenever a resident is transferred from one room to another within the facility, a written notice of transfer must be given to the resident and/or family prior to the move according to state law .1. If a resident is moving at the request of staff, a written explanation of why the move is necessary needs to be provided to both residents/families/representatives as one is getting a room change and the other is getting a new roommate. 2. Obtain the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a clean or home-like environment for 1 resident (R) (R41) of 20 sampled residents. R41's bedside tray table was not in a clean condition. Findings include: The facility did not have a policy regarding a clean, comfortable, and home-like environment. The facility provided an untitled and undated cleaning list that indicated: Resident Room Over-Bed Tables, scrub all areas of table (legs, base, stand, table top and table bottom). Polish if necessary. From 3/24/25 to 3/26/25, Surveyor reviewed R41's medical record. R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, muscle weakness, lymphedema, and pain in right and left knee. R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/15/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 which indicated R41 had moderately impaired cognition. R41 had a corporate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were updated for 3 residents (R) (R41, R10, and R37). R41 had an order to float heels. R41's care plan was not updated with the order and R41's heels were not floated. R10 and R37 had a known conflict with each other. R10's and R37's care plans did not reflect the conflict and did not contain interventions for redirection or how to avoid altercations. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan-Baseline and Comprehensive policy, dated 6/20/23, indicates: .12. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 1. From 3/24/25 to 3/26/25, Surveyor reviewed R41's medical record. R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dementia, patients non-compliance with medical treatment and regimen, muscle weakness, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, peripheral vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure range of motion exercises were completed in accordance with a range of motion program for 1 resident (R41) of 20 sampled residents. Documentation for R41's range of motion (ROM) program was not completed accurately and/or was not completed. Findings include: From 3/24/25 to 3/26/25, Surveyor reviewed R41's medical record. R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dementia, patients non-compliance with medical treatment and regimen, muscle weakness, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and pain in right and left knee. R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/15/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 which indicated R41 had moderately impaired cognition. R41 had a corporate Guardian for decision making. A care plan (revised 12/19/24) indicated R41 had limited physical mobility related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R56) of 5 sampled residents received influenza and COVID-19 vaccines as indicated. Upon admission to the facility, R56's Power of Attorney for Health Care (POAHC) signed a consent form for R56 to receive influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. The vaccines were not administered. Findings include: The facility's Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Policy, revised 9/19/24, indicates: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and recommendations are followed for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza .6. For residents and/or legal representatives consenting to receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine, the facility shall obtain a physician's order for the administration of the vaccine .8. Administration of the vaccine will be done upon a signed consent and valid physician's order and shall be recorded in the medical record. The facility's COVID-19 Vaccine Policy, revised 9/19/24, indicates: The CDC recommends…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents on 3 of 3 units. Utility rooms on all 3 units contained dust, debris, stains, and an odor of bodily waste, In addition, Surveyor observed risks of cross-contamination. Findings include: On 8/21/24, Surveyor completed a tour of the facility, including the soiled utility rooms (enclosed spaces meant to remove waste generated by resident care and soiled cleaning materials). On 8/21/24 at 11:31 AM, Surveyor toured the soiled utility room on unit 2. Upon opening the door, Surveyor noted an odor of human waste. Surveyor observed two uncovered trash containers that contained garbage bags with resident waste. Surveyor also observed dust, debris, and stains on the floor, stains on the walls, and several small garbage cans stacked to the side with an empty soda bottle. On 8/21/24 at 11:38 AM, Surveyor toured the soiled utility room on unit 4. Upon opening the door, Surveyor noted an odor of human waste. Surveyor observed two brooms with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R14 and R18) of 7 residents observed during medication pass were assessed as able to safely and accurately self-administer medication. On 8/21/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E left medication at R14 and R18's bedsides for R14 and R18 to self-administer. R14 and R18 did not have physician orders, self-administration of medication assessments, or care plans that indicated R14 and R18 could safely and accurately self-administer medication. Findings include: The facility's Medication Self Administration policy, dated 2/12/24, indicates: Purpose: To provide guidelines for the Interdisciplinary Team to determine that the practice of self-administration of medications is safe .1. The resident shall have a screen completed by a licensed nurse to determine factors that may impact the safe administration of medication .3. Residents who have been deemed appropriate to self-administer medication independently or with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 of 8 staff reviewed for background checks. The facility did not ensure a thorough and timely caregiver background check was completed for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F. Findings include: The facility's Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention policy, with a revision date of 10/4/23, indicates: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or exploitation .Screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment .This includes attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers, and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries .A criminal background check will be conducted on all prospective employees as provided by the facility's policy on criminal background checks, using the state specified criminal background check system . On 8/21/24, Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 8 sampled residents. On 2/24/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C gave R2 another resident's medication. Following the medication error, the facility did not ensure blood pressures were taken per the physician's order and provide education to LPN-C. Findings include: The facility's Medication Error and Drug Interactions policy, with a revision date of 2/12/24, indicates: .2. A detailed account of the error will be recorded in the resident's medical record. Such documentation must include, but is not limited to: .f. Date and time the physician was notified and what instructions were given. On 8/21/24, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/26/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations for 3 Residents (R) (R12, R17, and R18) of 7 residents observed during medication pass. On 8/21/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-D left a medication cup that contained eleven medications on R12's bedside table while RN-D left the room to attend to another resident. During observations of medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E administered open and undated medication to R17 and R18. Findings include: The facility's Labeling Medication policy, dated 1/22/24, indicates: Purpose: To ensure all medications maintained in the facility are properly labeled in accordance with current state and federal regulations .Procedure: .7. Medication vials/bottles will be labeled with the date they were opened (seal broken) to ensure proper tracking for expiration purposes . 1. On 8/21/24, Surveyor reviewed R12's medical record. R12 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 Residents (R) (R12 and R13) of 7 residents observed during the administration of medication. On 8/21/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-D did not complete proper hand hygiene during medication administration for R12. In addition, RN-D did not wear gloves as ordered during the administration of methimazole (used to treat hyperthyroidism). On 8/21/24, RN-D did not complete proper hand hygiene during medication administration for R13. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 5/8/24/24, indicates: Purpose: To provide guidelines to staff for proper and appropriate hand washing and hygiene techniques that will aid in the preventions of the transmission of infections .Using Alcohol-Based Hand Gel: .c. Before preparing or handling medications . 1. On 8/21/24 at 8:38 AM, Surveyor observed RN-D prepare medication for R12. Following medication preparation, RN-D did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure menu serving sizes were followed for protein, vegetable, and starch servings for mechanically altered (minced and moist) and regular consistency diets. This practice had the potential to affect 67 of 70 residents residing in the facility. During the lunch meal on 2/4/24, the facility served smaller serving portions than the lunch menu and diet tray cards indicated for 6 residents who received mechanically altered diets and 61 residents who received regular consistency diets. Findings include: During a continuous kitchen observation of lunch service beginning at 11:14 AM on 2/4/24, Surveyor noted diet tray cards for the lunch meal indicated: One pork rib, 4 oz. (ounce) serving of green beans, 4 oz. serving of roasted potatoes for regular consistency diets and 4 oz. serving of mashed potatoes (substitute for roasted potatoes) for mechanically altered diets (minced and moist). Surveyor observed Dietary Manager (DM)-D load the steam table with one container of roasted potatoes, one container of pork…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, home-like environment for 4 Residents (R) (R40, R46, R34, and R10) of 20 sampled residents with the potential to affect other residents who use common areas in the facility. During an observation of R40's room, Surveyor noted garbage, dried spills, and a urine odor. During an observation of R46's room, Surveyor noted dirt and debris on the floor. During an observation of R34's room, Surveyor noted debris on the floor. During an observation of R10's room, Surveyor noted food and debris on the floor and a urine odor. During an observation of the 100 wing activity room, Surveyor noted food, garbage, debris, and peeled wallpaper. During an observation of the 100 wing dining room, Surveyor noted garbage, debris, and structural damage to the walls and floors. During an observation of the 400 wing hallway and nursing station, Surveyor noted garbage, structural damage, and dried spills. Finding include: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure proper methods to rapidly cool or document cooling temperatures of time/temperature control for safety food not held hot or not for consumption within 4 hours. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour that began at 9:04 AM on 2/4/24, Dietary Manager (DM)-D indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. The facility's Cooling Temperature Log policy and procedure, dated 6/19/23, indicates: Purpose: To monitor cooling temperatures in order to ensure that all food is cooled within specified guidelines for the prevention of foodborne illness. Procedure: 1. Cooked foods shall be cooled under refrigeration within two hours from 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or greater to 70 degrees F and within a total of six hours from 135 degrees F to 41 degrees F or less. Temperatures of food placed in the cooler shall be recorded by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not provide appropriate care services for 1 Resident (R) (R48) of 2 sampled residents with an indwelling catheter. R48's uncovered catheter drainage bag was observed in direct contact with the floor. Findings include: On 2/6/24 at 1:10 PM, Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy and procedure for catheter care, dated 2/27/18. The policy did not address positioning/placement of tubing or catheter drainage bags. On 2/6/24, Surveyor reviewed R48's medical record. R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and epilepsy. R48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/3/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated R48 was not cognitively impaired. R48 had a legal Guardian. On 2/6/24 at 8:19 AM, Surveyor observed R48 lying in bed and noted R48's uncovered Foley catheter drainage bag was in direct contact with the floor and visible from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate and safe administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R49) of 20 sampled residents. On 2/4/24, Surveyor observed medication left at R49's bedside. R49 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician's order to self-administer medication. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications policy, revised on 1/22/24, indicates: Only licensed staff, or permitted by the State may prepare, administer, or record the administration of medication .Medications may be self-administered by residents who have been assessed and determined to be safe, and must have a physician's order. On 2/5/24, Surveyor reviewed R49's medical record. R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension. R49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FEINSTEIN, DANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 09/01/2017
LIFSICS, CHANNIEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL9%since 09/01/2017
POLSTEIN, MORDECHAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER16%since 09/01/2017
STESEL, MAXIMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST45%since 09/01/2017
WENDLING, CARRIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2017
MAUER, DOVIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2017
RICE, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 5%Other / private 18%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$304per resident / day
operating cost
$9,254per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525299. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next