No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edenbrook On Second Ave

200 Second Avenue, Kingston, PA 18704 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (570) 288-9315 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 288-9315 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Geisinger0.2 mi
480 Pierce St · (570) 714-3911 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
435 Pierce St · (570) 288-4519 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
481 Pierce St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
139 3rd Ave · (570) 283-1961

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.6%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.2%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.9%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.4%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.1%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.5%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.381.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.151.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.6%CMS range 33.2–48.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.7–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened17.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.0–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
65.6%
Total nursing turnover
68.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 114.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-08)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents on four out of 5 nursing units (B Hall, C Hall, D Hall, and TCU).Findings include: An observation on June 25, 2026, at 8:20 AM in the B Hall resident lounge revealed cobwebs in the courtyard-side window, debris, food crumbs, and wrappers along the edge of the floor on the hallway-side wall, peeling and torn wallpaper on three walls, brown liquid stains on walls, and orange food debris near the lounge entrance. An observation on June 25, 2026, at 8:27 AM in the D Hall resident lounge revealed brown and black food debris and yellow food pieces on the floor, torn and peeling wallpaper on three walls, and brown liquid stains on the courtyard-side wall. An observation on June 25, 2026, at 8:32 AM in the resident's main dining room revealed red and yellow food pieces and a smear near the center of the room and a small orange pill with 013 embossed on it. on the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Statement of Deficiencies from the survey ending May 8, 2026, the facility's Plan of Correction, revisit survey findings, and staff interview, it was determined the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee failed to implement and maintain an effective corrective action plan to prevent the recurrence of deficiencies related to providing residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.Findings include: During the survey ending May 8, 2026, the facility was cited for failing to provide and maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents.In response, the facility submitted a Plan of Correction that included immediate cleaning of identified resident rooms, shower rooms, and common areas. Shower rooms located on A Hall, B Hall, and C Hall were deep cleaned. Black buildup was removed from the grout (the material that fills the spaces between floor tiles), damaged grout was repaired, chipped floor tiles were replaced, and ceiling vents were cleaned to remove accumulated dust.The Plan of Correction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide and maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents on two of three nursing units.Findings include: Observation of Station B on May 5, 2026, at 11:38 AM revealed the floor surface in resident room D2, Bed A, was sticky to the touch. Observation of Station B on May 5, 2026, at 11:40 AM revealed the floor surface in resident room D5, Bed B, was sticky to the touch. Observation of Station A on May 5, 2026, at 8:30 AM revealed the floor surface in resident room B5, Bed B, was sticky to the touch. A review of Resident 108's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 10, 2026, revealed that Resident 108 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, select facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently ensure the provision of respiratory care and supplemental oxygen in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for three residents out of 28 residents reviewed. (Residents 3, 4, and 128).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration and Storage last reviewed by the facility on April 9, 2026, revealed that oxygen is to be administered at the prescribed amount. During an initial facility tour of the facility on April 5, 2026, at 11:10 AM, and again at 11:35 AM, Resident 3 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the dining room with an oxygen tank attached to the back of the wheelchair. The oxygen tank gauge indicated the tank was empty. This observation was confirmed by Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse). Clinical record review revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility planned menus, select facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to honor resident food preferences and ensure residents received meal items and condiments as identified on meal tray tickets, to the extent possible, for 2 of 28 residents reviewed for food services (Residents 10 and 55), and residents participating in a Resident Council group interview (Residents 5, 112, 46, 88, 51, 13, 10, 83, 8, 12, 120, 108, and 92).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Food and Meal Preferences, last reviewed by the facility on April 9, 2026, revealed the facility will make reasonable efforts to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets nutritional and special dietary needs while considering resident preferences and input from residents and resident groups. During an interview conducted on April 5, 2026, at 12:12 PM, Resident 55 stated she does not always receive the food items identified on her meal tray ticket or foods she requested.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Statement of Deficiencies from the survey ending May 8, 2026, the facility's Plan of Correction, revisit survey findings, and staff interview, it was determined the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee failed to implement and maintain an effective corrective action plan to prevent the recurrence of deficiencies related to providing residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.Findings include: During the survey ending May 8, 2026, the facility was cited for failing to provide and maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents.In response, the facility submitted a Plan of Correction that included immediate cleaning of identified resident rooms, shower rooms, and common areas. Shower rooms located on A Hall, B Hall, and C Hall were deep cleaned. Black buildup was removed from the grout (the material that fills the spaces between floor tiles), damaged grout was repaired, chipped floor tiles were replaced, and ceiling vents were cleaned to remove accumulated dust.The Plan of Correction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address aggressive behavior interventions and the care, monitoring, and maintenance needs associated with a central line for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 58).Findings include: A review of the policy titled Care Plans, Baseline, and Comprehensive, last reviewed by the facility on April 9, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that each resident receives care individualized to the resident and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties, including caregivers, the resident, and the resident's representative. The interdisciplinary team will develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident based on their medical condition, medical history, assessments from different members of the interdisciplinary team, lifestyle, and current resident goals.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered plan to provide trauma-informed care for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 5) with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Trauma-Informed Care, last reviewed by the facility on April 9, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents who are trauma (deeply distressing or disturbing experience)survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Residents will be screened and assessed upon admission in order to identify any history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The interdisciplinary team will ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and incident investigation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a fully functional call light system for one semi-private room, affecting two of 28 sampled residents (Residents 74 and 127).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition affecting blood sugar regulation) and kidney failure (loss of kidney function). A review of Resident 74's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 21, 2026, revealed that Resident 74 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information a score of 13-15 indicates intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, employee personnel records, clinical records, facility-provided investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement its established abuse prevention and response policies following an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident 1) out of 9 residents reviewed and failed to follow required employee screening procedures for one of three employees reviewed (Employee 1) Findings include:A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Prevention Policy defined serious bodily injury to include sexual acts involving a resident who is unable to consent or understand the nature of the act. The policy directed that in the event of suspected maltreatment (abuse, neglect, or exploitation), the resident must be assessed for injuries and trauma. The policy also directed staff to preserve evidence by not bathing or cleaning the resident, not washing or discarding clothing or linens, and not destroying documentation. The policy further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and three of five resident pantry areas (Nursing Units Medbridge Hall, A Hall, and B Hall). Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean, and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness, according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observations on September 25, 2025, at 8:28 AM revealed the kitchen floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean and homelike environment for four out of five nursing units (Units Medbridge Hall, A Hall, B Hall, and D Hall), including experiences reported by two out of three residents interviewed (Residents 1 and 2). Findings include:A review of resident council meeting minutes dated August 4, 2025, revealed residents in attendance expressed concerns regarding the housekeeping services. Residents reported that only garbage is emptied, and floors are occasionally mopped. Additional concerns included housekeepers using dirty water to mop floors, particularly in hallways and dining areas; lack of top dusting; dusty surfaces; spider webs; over-bed tables not being cleaned; and bathroom floors uncleaned. Observations on September 25, 2025, at 8:26 AM revealed a black mat with multiple pieces of white debris, a wet paper towel, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by three residents out of 29 residents sampled (Residents 2, 3, and 5) and four out of five residents interviewed during a resident group interview (Residents 4, 61, 77, and 112). Findings include: During a resident council meeting on June 4, 2025, at 10:00 AM, Residents 4, 61, 77, and 112 voiced concerns about the timeliness of staff response to activated call bell lights. Resident 112 stated he rang his call bell for assistance the night before but did not receive help for over one hour. He needed assistance with toileting. He reported that he has waited at least 30 minutes anytime he utilized the call bell. Resident 4 stated that he frequently waited over an hour for staff to answer his call bell. He stated that staff often enter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to thoroughly assess, obtain physician orders, and develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan in accordance with standards of practice, for one residents out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 3) and failed to provide nursing care consistent with professional standards of practice in accordance with physician orders for one resident out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 93). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to properly store resident personal care equipment on one of five nursing units (A wing) and failed to store a urinary catheter drainage bag in a manner to limit the potential for infection for one of three sampled residents (Resident 29). Findings include: A review of the facility Infection Control Program Policy last reviewed May 5, 2025, indicated the infection control program exists to assure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and personnel. It is designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. An observation on June 3, 2025, at 11:58 AM in the bathroom of resident room A 05 revealed a grey bedpan on the floor under the sink, wedged between the garbage can and the wall. The bedpan was not enclosed in a plastic bag and was in direct contact with the floor, wall, and garbage can. A pink wash basin was also observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a care plan conference and failed to ensure that the resident was invited to participate in the care planning process for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 112). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include a below the knee amputation of the left lower extremity (leg), and end stage renal disease (final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where the kidneys can no longer function on their own). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated May 12, 2025, revealed that Resident 112 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement a planned intervention to prevent intrusive wandering by a cognitively impaired resident (Resident 103) which resulted in a resident-to-resident altercation for two of 29 sampled residents (Residents 91 and 103). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces) and hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 4, 2025, revealed that Resident 91 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy and clinical record, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary and functional condition for one resident (Resident 40) out of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration and Storage last reviewed on May 5,2025, revealed a nebulizer mouthpiece (a piece of medical equipment that a person with asthma or other respiratory conditions use to administer medication directly and quickly to the lungs) and tubing should be labeled with the date and changed weekly. A review of Resident 40's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD a disease that restricts airflow to the lungs and causes breathing problems). A review of the Resident 40's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated May 5,2025, for Ipratropium 0.5mg- Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, payor source data, resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure timely and necessary dental services for one resident who is a Medicaid recipient (Resident 110) out of 29 residents reviewed. Findings included: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities). Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to identify specific resident care needs) dated May 5, 2025, revealed Resident 110 was cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 7 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, which assesses cognition, a tool to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information, a score of 0-7 equates to being severely cognitively impaired). The resident's care plan, initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, documentation provided by the facility, and staff and resident family interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to personal privacy for one resident out of eight sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Photographing, Video and Audio Recording, and Other Imaging of Residents, Visitors, and Associates, dated April 1, 2022, revealed it is the facility's policy to take reasonable steps to protect residents, visitors, and associates from unauthorized photography, video or audio recordings, or other images. The policy indicates photography and audio recording of residents within the facility by associates for personal use is prohibited. A clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include down syndrome (a genetic condition that causes physical and intellectual disabilities) and dementia (a condition characterized by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0560 — isolated
    Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's room change was not completed for the purpose of staff convenience for one resident out of 8 sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes (disease that occurs when your body doesn't produce enough insulin or doesn't use it properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels). Further review of the resident's clinical revealed the resident resided in Room A6 from June 2, 2024, until December 24, 2024, when he was moved to room B 11. A social service progress note dated December 24, 2024, at 12:00 PM indicated that staff attempted to notify Resident 1 of the room change by calling his phone three times while the resident was at the hospital. Messages were left on his voicemail. A subsequent progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigative reports, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records, according to professional standards of practice for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. According to the Title 49,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to reasonably accommodate a request and need for more frequent bed linen changes for one resident out of eight residents sampled (Resident 2). Findings incudes: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include morbid obesity (complex chronic disease in which a person has a body mass index of 40 or higher) and lymphedema (chronic condition that causes tissue swelling usually in the arms or legs in which accumulated fluid could break the skin resulting in leakage). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated August 31, 2024, revealed the resident had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status- tool to screen and identify the cognitive condition of long-term care residents) score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record and facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that in preparation for a room change each resident/resident representative received written notice, including the reason for the change before the resident's room was changed for two of 15 room changes completed by the facility from October 30, 2024, through November 4, 2024 (Resident 1 and Resident 2). Findings include: Federal regulatory guidance under §483.10(e)(6) notes that moving to a new room or changing roommates is challenging for residents. A resident's preferences should be taken into account when considering such changes. When a resident is being moved at the request of facility staff, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must receive an explanation in writing of why the move is required. The resident should be provided the opportunity to see the new location, meet the new roommate, and ask questions about the move. A review of the facility Room Change/Roommate Assignment Policy, last reviewed July 2024, indicated that changes in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by seven residents out of the 29 residents sampled (Residents 3, 34, 85, 66, 57, 6, and 38). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated August 5, 2024 revealed that Resident 3 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13-15 indicates cognition is intact). A clinical record review revealed Resident 34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment in two resident rooms and the A unit. (Resident 68 and Resident 39) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Shower/Bath last reviewed by the facility on July 18, 2024, indicated that staff will change a resident's bed linens on shower days or when visible soilage is observed. An observation on August 20, 2024, at 11:44 AM , in resident room A06, bed A, revealed soiled bed linens on Resident 68's bed. The resident's pillowcase contained multiple reddish-brown stains, the fitted sheet had a large yellow stain in the middle of the mattress, and there were multiple light brown stains at the foot of the bed. Interview with Resident 68, a cognitively intact resident with a BIMS score of 15 (BIMS-brief interview to assess cognitive status. A score of 13-15 indicates intact cognitive responses), indicated he has not had his sheets changed in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a functional and sanitary manner for three residents out of 29 sampled (Residents 9, 22, and 135). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration last reviewed by the facility on July 18, 2024, revealed when oxygen is not in use, the oxygen tubing, nasal cannula (flexible plastic tubing with small prongs inserted into the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen) or mask is to be stored separately in a labeled plastic bag. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), and atherosclerotic heart disease (build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls which causes obstruction of blood flow). The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure acceptable storage for medications on one of two nursing units observed. (Medication Storage Room B). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Disposition of Discontinued Medications, last reviewed by the facility on July 18, 2024, revealed the facility will destroy or return medication in accordance with the facility policy. The discontinued medication procedure includes four steps: 1. Obtain order for discontinued medications 2. Timely remove medication from medication cart 3. Follow pharmacy/facility policy specific to a. controlled substances b. fentanyl patches c. medication returns 4. Medication awaiting final disposition will be locked in the medication room once removed from the medication cart. A review of facility policy titled 3.0 Returned Medications to the Pharmacy & Credits last reviewed by the facility on July 18, 2024, revealed the procedure of returning medication from the facility to the pharmacy indicated, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse policy, clinical records, facility investigations, information submitted by the facility to the state agency, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to timely report an alleged violation of misappropriation of resident property for one resident out of 26 reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Policy reviewed by the facility July 18, 2024, indicated the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property (deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent) and exploitation. It is the policy of the facility that abuse allegations (abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) are reported per Federal and State Law. The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan to meet the specific needs of two residents out of 29 sampled (Residents 63 and 87). Findings including: A clinical record review revealed Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and cerebral infarction (brain damage that results from a lack of blood). A review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated July 4, 2024, revealed that Resident 63 is severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 03 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 01-07 indicates severe cognitive impairment). A care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents were provided with the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, by failing to provide showers/bed bath as scheduled and personal grooming for two of 26 residents sampled (Residents 42 and 138). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to end stage renal disease with hemodialysis (a treatment that filters waste, salts, and fluids form the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to do so) and a right femur (thigh bone) fracture. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated August 4, 2024, indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (brief interview for mental status, a tool to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered quality care by failing to follow physician orders for NPO (nothing by mouth) in preparation for an abdominal ultrasound for one resident (Resident 133) and failed to follow physician orders for the consistent application of a prescribed therapeutic measure, ace wraps, for one resident of 29 sampled (Resident 87). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hepatic encephalopathy (loss of brain function when a damaged liver does not remove toxins from the blood), dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining). A review of a physician's order dated August 20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered intravenous (IV- medication is administered through needle or tube inserted into a vein) medications, an antibiotic, were administered as prescribed for one resident out of 26 sampled (Resident 67). Findings include: Review of the facility Medication Administration Policy last reviewed by the facility on July 18, 2024, indicated medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications must be administered in accordance with orders, including any required time frame. Review of Resident 67 clinical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on July 30, 2024, with a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter- thin flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and guided into a large vein above the right side of the heart and used to administer fluid and medications) and diagnoses to include osteomyelitis (bone infection that causes inflammation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records of treatment administration to one resident of 29 sampled (Resident 87). Findings included: A review of the clinical records revealed Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), and fracture of the neck of the left femur (hip fracture). A physician's order dated June 17, 2024, revealed an order for ace wraps to his bilateral legs, on in the AM and off at HS (hours of sleep). Two times a day check skin integrity with application and removal. Observation of Resident 87 sitting in his Broda chair (specialty chair used for positioning and pressure reducing) in the B Hall dining room on August 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was not wearing ace wraps on his bilateral lower extremities (legs) as ordered. However, a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records, CDC infection control guidance, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to implement transmission-based precaution control practices to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infections in the facility for four out of five residents sampled for transmission-based precautions (Residents 2, 63, 66, and 121) and failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one out of 29 residents sampled (Resident 49). Findings include: A review of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infection Agents in Healthcare Settings, last updated July 2023, Section II.E. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Healthcare Personnel, revealed that designated containers for used disposable or reusable PPE should be placed in a location that is convenient to the site of removal to facilitate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident room is designed and equipped to assure full visual privacy for one out of the 29 residents sampled (Resident 107). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include acute kidney failure (a sudden loss of kidney function) and intellectual disabilities (significant deficits in general cognitive abilities such as reasoning, planning, and problem solving). A review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated June 22, 2024, revealed that Resident 107 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records, and select investigative reports and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of 10 sampled was free from verbal abuse (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse policy last reviewed by the facility on March 2024, indicated that the objective of the abuse policy is to comply with the seven-step approach to abuse and neglect detention and prevention. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included dementia. Review of Resident 2's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy and staff witness statements, and staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident abuse and prevent the potential for further abuse during the course of the investigation for one resident out of 10 resident sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse prohibition policy last reviewed by the facility on March 2024, indicated that the objective of the abuse policy is to comply with the seven-step approach to abuse and neglect detention and prevention. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated. The designated facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision and effective safety measures to prevent an elopement by one resident (Resident 1) out of 10 sampled residents Findings include: A review of a select facility policy for Leave of Absence (LOA), reviewed April 1, 2024 revealed It is the policy of the facility to coordinate, when appropriate, the preparation for nd return from a leave of absence but not limited to physical, medical and medication needs. The purpose of the policy is to ensure resident's are met during their absence from the facility and to ensure sfety of the wheelchair user and other individuals while out in the community. Procedures to include: - the licensed nurse will ensure that there is a physician's order and perform any needed education. -having a personal cell phone to use during LOA is recommended -when the resident is ready to leave the facility, the nurse will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure acceptable storage and use by dates for multi-dose medications on two of four medication carts observed (B hall and C hall). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility November 2023, revealed the procedure for staff to check the expiration date on the medication label. When opening a multi-dose container, place the date on the container. Observation of the B Hall medication cart on May 15, 2024, at 9:40 AM in the presence of Employee 1 (licensed practical nurse), revealed a vial of Lantus injectable 100 ml (a medication used to treat diabetes), a vial of Novolog injectable 100 ml (a medication used to treat diabetes), and a vial of Levemir injectable (a medication used to treat diabetes) opened and used, but not dated when initially opened. Observation of the C Hall medication cart on May 15, 2024, at 9:55 AM in the presence of Employee 2 (licensed practical nurse),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, select facility policy and incident report reviews and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide individualized services necessary to maintain continence and prevent continued decline and assure the resident received the necessary staff assistance to meet the resident's toileting needs in an attempt to decrease incontinency for one resident out of 25 sampled (Resident 27). Findings included: A review of the current facility policy for urinary and bowel incontinence revealed, it is the policy of the facility to identify, assess and provide the appropriate treatment and service to achieve or maintain as much normal urinary and bowel function as possible. Residents shall have their continence status assessed upon admission, re-admission and after identified decline/change in condition. Once an incontinent resident is identified, the staff will develop a plan of care to manage issues with incontinence, allowing them to reach their highest level of function. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for diabetes management for one resident (Resident 7) out of 25 sampled. Findings included: A clinical records review revealed that Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood glucose levels). A physician order initially dated March 10, 2023, indicated that staff were to administer HumaLOG Solution 100 units/milliliter (Insulin) with instructions for the dose to be based on a sliding scale depending on the resident's blood sugar reading; inject as per the sliding scale: if the resident's blood sugar was between 151-200, administer 2 units; if 201-250, administer 4 units; if 251-300 administer 6 units; if 301-350 administer 8 units; if 351-400, administer 10 units; if 401-999, administer 12 units. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-08 · tag F0627 — widespread
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement discharge planning consistent with a resident's expressed discharge goals and demonstrated self-care abilities for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 7).Findings included: A review of in-service documentation provided by the facility, dated December 2, 2025, revealed that discharge planning is a process that generally begins on admission and involves identifying each resident's discharge goals and needs, developing and implementing interventions to address them, and continuously evaluating them throughout the resident's stay to ensure a successful discharge. If discharge to the community is determined to not be feasible, the facility must document who made the determination and why. Clinical record review revealed Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes (a chronic disease affecting the body's ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-08 · tag F0628 — widespread
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility initiated transfer notices, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide copies of written notice of facility initiated hospital transfers of residents to a representative of the Office of the State Ombudsman for four out of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 14, and 118).Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on January 16, 2026, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was transferred to the hospital on February 18, 2026, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 14 was transferred to the hospital on August 6, 2025, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 14 was also transferred to the hospital on September 27, 2025, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 14 was also transferred to the hospital on January 29, 2026, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LIFSICS, CHANNIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
MAUER, DOVIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
POLSTEIN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
STESEL, MAXIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
ZARKH, GLEBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
KINGSTON SNF REALTY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
ALMEKY, IBRAHIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
CUNDEY, CHELSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-37.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$634K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 4%Other / private 4%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $634K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,431per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$250per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395397. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next