Edenbrook Lakeside
2115 E Woodstock Pl, Milwaukee, WI 53202 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (414) 271-1020 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $138,434 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-10)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.4% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.1% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.7% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.4% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.0% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.2% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 15.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 1.66 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.85 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.6%CMS range 21.6–48.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.3–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.5–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 7 of 8 residents (R2, R11, R15, R47, R74, R85, and R105) reviewed for pressure injuries. *R2 was admitted to the facility without any pressure injuries (PIs) and was assessed to be at risk for PIs. R2 developed an unstageable PI to the sacrum. The facility failed to implement an air mattress and implement a turning and repositing program prior to sacrum pressure injury development. The sacrum PI became infected requiring intravenous antibiotics and a 2-week hospitalization. The sacrum PI is currently a stage 4. *R11 was admitted to the facility with no documentation of pressure injuries and was assessed to be at risk for PI development. R11 developed an unstageable left heel PI and a right DTI (deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for abuse was free from sexual abuse. The facility did not ensure R16 was free from sexual abuse by another resident (R17.) On 12/01/23, R17 was found in R16's room by a CNA. R17 was on top of R16; R16's gown was pulled up over her abdomen, R16's brief was torn, and R17's hand was observed moving back and forth on R16's vagina. R17 had also engaged in fondling R16's breasts and sucking on her nipples. R16 had activated her call light and shouted for assistance 16 minutes prior to staff responding and removing R17 from R16's room. The facility's failure to keep R16 safe from sexual abuse created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 12/1/23. Surveyor notified NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) A of the immediate jeopardy on 12/6/23 at 1:24 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/2/23, however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity of F (potential for harm/widespread) while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide basic life support, including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to a resident who required emergency care for 1 (R6) of 3 residents reviewed for CPR. The facility currently has 73 out of 98 residents who desire CPR (Full Code). R6 was a full code (wanted CPR) and was found pulseless and nonbreathing on [DATE]. An LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) failed to initiate CPR when R6 was found to be pulseless and not breathing. The LPN checked the resident's code status (which was full code,) then called the on-call nurse, contacted the physician, contacted the Power of Attorney, went up 1 floor to get a nurse, returned to the 1st floor, called 911, and then after approximately 15 minutes of R6 first being found unresponsive, facility staff moved her to her room and CPR was initiated. Facility failure to immediately call a code for R6 to alert staff to the need for assistance, the failure to call 911 immediately, and the failure to not start CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure they provided an environment free from accident hazards for 2 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for accidents and supervision (R59 and R110.) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E rolled R59 away from them while providing care in bed and R59 rolled out of bed on to the floor. The facility's investigation into the fall identified R59's specialty air mattress was not appropriately attached to the bedframe allowing the mattress to flip upright when R59 was rolled onto their right side causing R59 to fall. R59 suffered a L2 lumbar fracture as a result of the fall from the bed to the floor. R110 has been assessed to need the assistance of 1 staff member and a gait belt for safety for transfers. Surveyor observed R110 being transferred by 1 staff member without the use of a gait belt for safety. Evidenced by: 1.) R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing. -R3 developed a facility-acquired, unstageable pressure injury to the sacrum on 10/28/23. The facility's wound Registered Nurse (RN)-D measured the wound but did not include a thorough initial assessment of the wound bed upon discovery. The facility's documentation of the Braden's score for predicting pressure injuries was inconsistent in the weeks preceding the development of the sacral pressure injury and continued to be inconsistent after the development of the pressure injury. The Braden score ranged from 8 to 15. The lowest score of 8 indicating a very high risk for pressure injury and the highest score 15 indicating a mild risk for pressure injury development. On 12/19/23, R3's sacral wound had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 1 of 1 resident (R) on enhanced barrier precautions (R110.)On 6/2/26, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F and CNA-G did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment when providing morning cares and toileting with R110 who is on enhanced barrier precautions.Findings include:The facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions and dated 3/26/24 documents under policy: It is the policy of this facility that Enhanced Barrier Precautions, in addition to Standard and Contact Precautions will be implemented during high-contact resident care activities when caring for residents that have an increased risk for acquiring a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) such as a resident with chronic wounds requiring a dressing, indwelling medical devices or residents with infection or colonization with an MDRO. Overview documents:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure proper inspection of resident's beds for 2 (R110 & R59) of 5 beds. *A gap of approximately five inches was observed between R110's air mattress and foot board on 6/1/256 & 6/2/26. *On 4/17/26, staff reported R59's bed suddenly lifted on the window side causing R59 to fall on the floor. Post-incident inspections identified a broken clip securing the air mattress strap to R59's bed frame. There is no evidence that R59's bed was inspected after the air mattress was placed. On 6/1/26, surveyors observed approximately five inches of R59's mattress was not supported by the bed frame on the left side. Findings include: R110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include polyneuropathy (simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves in the body), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces within the spine which puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves), peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition which narrows…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility did not designate a licensed nurse to serve as a charge nurse on each tour of duty. * The facility did not designate a charge nurse for each tour of duty on each daily nursing schedule.* The facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for the months of October through December in 2025.This deficient practice has the potential to affect 98 of 98 residents in the Facility.Findings include: 1.) Surveyor reviewed 30 days of nursing staff schedules. Surveyor noted that the facility's nursing staff schedules did not designate who the charge nurse was for each tour of duty.On 03/26/2026, at 12:02 PM, Surveyor interviewed Staff Development Director-M regarding how a charge nurse is designated for each tour of duty. Staff Development Director-M replied that during the day the Director of Nursing (DON) or Assistant DONs or infection preventionist are in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and did not ensure expired medications were removed from 2 of 3 medication carts.*An expired stock bottle of Acetaminophen 325 mg (milligrams) was observed in the first-floor south medication cart.*R95's Lispro insulin pen was not dated when opened & used.*2 blister packs of Hydralazine 100 mg (milligrams) containing 30 tablets each for R45 were expired on 8/31/25 and 9/30/25.*R59's Cyclobenzaprine 10 mg blister pack containing 22 tablets was expired on 2/28/26.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Medication Storage and last revised 2/12/24 documents under the Purpose section: To ensure that medications and biological are stored in a safe, secure storage and safe handling. Under the general guidelines section it documents: 4. Expired medications are to be removed from areas medication carts prior to or at the time of expiration. Under Stock Medications it documents: 1. Medications will be stored in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0826 — patternProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that residents received specialized respiratory therapy provided by and performed by qualified personnel for no less than three residents while Respiratory Therapist (RT)-L was employed at the facility.*Respiratory Therapist (RT)-L was hired [DATE]. RT-L's RT license expired on [DATE]. RT-L worked in the facility from [DATE] until [DATE] with an expired license.Findings include:The facility does not have a policy for the credentialing respiratory therapists.The facility's assessment last reviewed and updated [DATE] documents the facility has special treatments consisting of tracheostomy care with 10-18 average residents receiving tracheostomy care. Specific practices consist of respiratory therapy that is provided to residents. Surveyor reviewed RT-L's employee file. RT-L was hired on [DATE]. RT-L's RT license expired on [DATE]. RT-L was no longer employed at the facility effective [DATE]. RT-L worked in the facility from [DATE] until [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 4 (R11, R15, R3, & R46) of 4 residents reviewed. *Appropriate hand hygiene was not observed during incontinent cares for R11.*Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-Y did not wear appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while providing incontinence cares for R15 who is on enhanced barrier precautions.*Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-T touched R3's medication with her bare hands.*During G (gastrointestinal)-tube medication administration the syringe was observed to fall on the floor. Registered Nurse (RN)-U rinsed the syringe off and proceed to use the syringe to administer R46's medication.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene and last revised 5/8/24 under documents: To provide guidelines to staff for proper and appropriate hand washing and hygiene techniques that will aid in the prevention of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with dignity and respect that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. This occurred for 2 (R77 & R105) of 22 residents reviewed for dignity.*R77 was observed to be in a gown during the survey process. R77 would prefer to wear clothes.*R105 was in the same soiled clothes during the survey process. R105 preferred to wear clean clothes.Findings include:The facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated as revised 10/24/23 documents:Policy: The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the residents.Procedure:1.The resident has the right to exercise his or her rights to all residents of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States.2.Federal and state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide the opportunity for 2 (R77 and R105) of 2 residents reviewed to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care by not facilitating the inclusion of R105 and R77 in the care planning process. *R77 was admitted on [DATE], and there is no documentation in R77's electronic medical record that R77 and/or representative participated in the development and implementation of R77's person-centered plan of care.*R105 was admitted on [DATE], and there is no documentation in R105's electronic medical record that R105 and/or representative participated in the development and implementation of R105's person-centered plan of care.Findings include:The facility's policy titled Care Plan-Baseline and Comprehensive policy dated as revised 7/18/24 documents:Purpose: To ensure that each resident receives care individualized to him or herself and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R70) of 1 residents reviewed was clinically appropriate to self-administer medications.* R70 was observed with approximately 11 medication pills in a medication cup on the over bed table next to R70. R70 did not have a self administration assessment of medication completed.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Medication Self Administration, last revised 2/12/2024, documents: 1. The resident shall have an screen completed by a licensed nurse to determine factors that may impact the safe administration of medications.R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included heart failure.R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition for R70. The MDS documents that R70 was assessed to have no behaviors and documented that R70 received scheduled pain medication during the MDS assessment period. R70's self-administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 (R77) of 22 residents reviewed were provided with reasonable accommodations for resident needs and preferences. *R77 was provided an over toilet riser with bilateral handles by therapy, and the over toilet riser was removed without a medical or safety reason. Findings include:The facility's policy titled Accommodation of Needs dated 4/10/25 documents:Policy Statement: The facility is committed to providing care and services that accommodate the individual needs, preferences, and rights of each resident in accordance with federal and state regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and CMS Requirements of Participation under 42 CFR 483. The facility will make reasonable accommodations to ensure residents attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Purpose: To ensure all residents receive individualized care and services that reflect their unique needs, choices, cultural…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement policy and procedures related to screening employees for a prior history of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 employees reviewed. The facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented when one employee's (Housekeeper-V) Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) background check was not obtained before the employee started working at the facility. Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention last revised 3/25/25 documents::Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment t that is free from harm.1. Screening and Training of New Employees and Volunteers:A. Employees:i. Screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. That includes . checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries.iv. A criminal background check will be conducted on all prospective employees as provided by the facility's policy on criminal background checks, using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for 3 (R11, R77 & R85) of 22 residents reviewed. *R11 did not have an oxygen care plan. *R77 did not have a care plan for tubi grips. *R85 did not have a dehydration care plan. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Care Plan – Baseline and Comprehensive and last revised 7/18/24 documents: To ensure that each resident care individualized to him or herself and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties including caregivers, the resident, and the resident's representative. Under the Policy section it documents: The Interdisciplinary Team will develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident based on their medical condition, medical history, assessments from different members of the interdisciplinary team, lifestyle, and current resident goals. 1.) R11's diagnoses include acute respiratory failure (lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not update the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (R10) of 22 residents to meet a resident's medical, nursing and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment.R10's care plan was not updated after R10 was removed from hospice services.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plan-Baseline and Comprehensive last revised 7/18/24, documents: Purpose- To ensure that each resident receives care individualized to him or herself and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties including caregivers, the resident, and the resident's representative. Policy: The Interdisciplinary Team will develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident based on their medical condition, medical history, assessments from different members of the interdisciplinary team, lifestyle, and current resident goals.Procedure:7. Throughout the course of rehabilitation and the resident's stay…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R105) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance received the necessary services to maintain ability to practice good grooming and personal hygiene.*R105, whom requires assistance from facility staff, did not receive any showers in the last 30 days and was observed in the same clothes during survey. Findings include:The facility policy entitled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), last revised 2/25/2025 documents: 1. A resident will be given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living.2. The facility will provide care and services for the following activities of daily living:Bathing and hygiene: Assistance with bathing or showering and maintaining personal hygiene.Dressing: Helping residents put on or remove clothing.Based on the assessments, a personalized care plan is created. It outlines the level of assistance needed for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 (R5, R47 and R105) of 4 residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene.*R5, who is dependent on staff, only received 1 shower in 30 days, with no documented refusals. R5, who is also dependent on staff for toileting, was not checked or changed for incontinence and was observed with a saturated brief.*R47, who is dependent on staff, did not receive any showers in the last 30 days, with no documented refusals. R47, who is totally dependent on staff, was not checked or changed for incontinence per R47's care plan.Findings include:The facility policy entitled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), last revised 2/25/2025 documents: 1. A resident will be given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living.2. The facility will provide care and services for the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received necessary care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R77) of 22 residents reviewed for quality of care.*R77's physician orders document that R77 is to wear bilateral tubi-grips during the day and off at night. Surveyor observed R77 not wearing bilateral tubi-grips during the survey process.Findings include:R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Peripheral Vascular Disease(circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to limbs), Cellulitis(bacterial skin infection affecting deep dermis and subcutaneous tissue) of Right Lower Limb, Essential Hypertension(chronic condition of persistently high blood pressure), Hypothyroidism(underactive thyroid), and Hyperlipidemia(high levels of fat particles in blood).R77's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 2/16/26 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score to be 14,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R74 & R2) of 6 residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. *R74 was observed not wearing the right palm guard and left-hand carrot during the survey. *R2 was observed not wearing bilateral palm guards during the survey. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Orthotics and dated 12/8/25 documents under purpose To ensure safe, clinically appropriate, person-centered use of hand splints and braces that support function, prevent/mitigate contracture or deformity, protect healing tissues, and reduce pain while maintaining resident rights, dignity, and freedom from unnecessary restraint. 1.) R74 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (a life threatening type of stroke caused by a ruptured blood vessel), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards with smoking materials for 1 (R82) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking and that residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 (R22 and R106) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. * R82 was seen vaping in R82's room for the duration of the survey. * R22 was observed not to have fall interventions in place the duration of the survey. R22 also had multiple falls that were not thoroughly investigated. * R106 had multiple falls that were not thoroughly investigated. Findings Include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Smoking and E-Cigarettes revised on [DATE] documents: When the resident requests to smoke (includes smoking of any material, including but not limited to tobacco, marijuana, saliva (sage), etc). Smoking will only be allowed in designated outdoor area(s) in the facility that are not near flammable substances or where oxygen is in use. - Smoking -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R4) of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition received therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem and the health care provider orders a therapeutic diet.* R4 was not provided with a meal supplement per R4's plan of care.Findings include:R4 was admitted the facility on 12/18/24 with diagnoses of Unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (A deficiency of protein and calories leading to weakened immunity), Gastroparesis (chronic digestive disorder causing delayed stomach emptying causing nausea and vomiting), and Dependence on Renal Dialysis (the person requires dialysis to remove toxins from the body due to the kidneys not functioning properly).R4's nutritional care plan initiated 12/18/24 and revised on 2/26/26 documents under the Interventions section:- Provide supplements with Med pass as ordered: Nepro BID (2 times a day) daily. Document and monitor acceptance. Initiated 11/25/2025, revised 2/8/26- Honor resident's food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R5) of 1 residents reviewed with a gastronomy tube (G-tube) received appropriate treatment and services. *R5 has a physician order to measure R5's G-tube to check for placement, indicating R5's tube length should be 16 inches plus or minus 1. This order was not transcribed into the R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR)/ Treatment Administration Record (TAR) so that nursing staff could accurately monitor placement of R5's G-tube. Findings include:The facility's policy titled: Verifying Placement of Feeding Tubes, last revised 9/8/2023, documents: 1. Gastrostomy tube will be marked with a permanent marker at the exit sit of tube. 2. Upon admission or with placement of new tube, the length is measured from exit site to end of tube and documented in clinical record. 3. Tube length will be visually inspected by checking initial mark on tube prior to accessing tube. 4, If external tube length has changed or mark on tube is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (R11) of 1 resident receiving oxygen therapy.R11's oxygen concentrator did not have a humidification bottle according to physician orders.Findings include:R11's diagnoses include acute respiratory failure (lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide) with hypoxia (low level of oxygen), congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and hypoxemia (abnormally low level of oxygen in the blood), and hypertension (high blood pressure).R11's physician order dated 10/24/25 documents: Change oxygen humidifier bottle weekly and prn (as needed).On 3/23/26, at 9:52 a.m., Surveyor observed R11 in bed on his back with the head of the bed elevated. Surveyor observed R11 is receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 1.5 liters per minute. Surveyor observe R11's oxygen concentrator did not have a humidifier bottle.On 3/23/26, from 10:59 a.m. to 11:21 a.m., Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-Y and CNA-Z…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide all the required transfer notice information for a resident transfer out of the facility. This was observed with 1 (R6) of 1 resident transfer reviews. * R6 was transferred to the hospital from the facility. There is not documentation they were provided the required transfer notice information. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Admission, Readmission, Bed Hold, and Transfer/Discharge dated 10/12/21, documents . Transfer/discharge: Before the facility transfer or discharges a resident, the facility must - * Notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand.; Include in the notice - * The reason for transfer or discharge. * The location to which the resident is transferred or discharged . * A statement of the resident's right to appeal including the name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not permit a resident to be readmitted to the facility immediately following hospitalization. This was observed with 1 (R6) of 1 resident reviewed for readmission. * R6 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. On 12/13/24 R6 was transferred from the hospital back to the facility however the facility denied readmission. R6 was sent back to the hospital. R6 did not have a change in their clinical status to be denied readmission to the facility. R6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Admission, Readmission, Bed Hold, and Transfer/Discharge dated 10/12/21 documents .readmission: * A resident whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan, will be re-admitted to the facility to their previous room (if available) or to the first available bed in a semi-private room if the resident; - Requires the services provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R82 and R31) of 18 residents reviewed had an individualized comprehensive plan of care. * R82 did not have a comprehensive care plan for R82's foley catheter that was inserted on 9/23/2024. * R31 was assessed to be incontinent of bowel and bladder and did not have a care plan in place with relevant interventions. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Care Plan- Baseline and Comprehensive revised on 6/20/2023 documents, Purpose: To ensure that each resident receives care individualized to him or herself and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties including caregivers, the resident, and the resident's representative. Policy: The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident based on their medical condition, medical history, assessments from different members of the IDT, lifestyle, and current resident goals. Procedure: 1. The care plan is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R55) of 1 residents receiving medications through G (Gastronomy Tube ) tube received the care necessary to meet professional standards. * On 10/24/24, Surveyor observed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-C administer medications to R55 via G tube. LPN-C did not check G tube placement prior to instilling medication. Findings include: The facility's Tube Feeding: Administering Medications Policy and Procedure with revision date of 9/8/23 documents: 9. Verify placement of feeding tube: Verifying Placement of Feeding Tube Policy The facility's Verifying Placement of Feeding Tubes Policy and Procedure with revision date of 9/8/23 indicate . 1. Gastronomy Tube will be marked with a permanent marker at the exit site of tube. 2. Upon admission or with placement of new tube, the length is measured from exit site to end of tube and documented in clinical record. 3. Tube length will be visually inspected by checking initial mark on tube prior to accessing tube. 4. If external tube length has changed or mark on tube is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received post fall assessments as indicated in the Facility policy in order to guarantee a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R56) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. R56 did not have post fall assessments completed per policy of once per shift for 3 days for falls that occurred on June 6/29/24 and 8/30/2024. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Post Fall Policy revised 10/13/23, documents (in part): Monitoring and Re-evaluation -Document on resident's condition at a minimum of every shift for 72 hours. -Staff should document relevant post-fall clinical findings, such as vital signs, pain, swelling, bruising and changes in function or cognitive status. -Staff will have increased awareness that the resident has recently fallen and report any changes in function, increased pain, and changes in cognition to the nurse for further evaluation. -Monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, including the ongoing communication with the dialysis center before and after dialysis treatments for 1 (R43) of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. R43 has a physician order for dialysis at Fresenius on Capitol on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Communication between the Facility and the dialysis center was not being shared with each visit. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Care of Hemodialysis Resident last revised on 6/28/2021 documents (in part): Procedure . -Facility will have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility . Post Dialysis -Review communication documents for any pertinent information . 1.) R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that includes sepsis, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. R43's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure its medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater. The facility medication error rate was 41.67%. On 10/24/24, R55 was administered medications via G (gastronomy) tube. LPN-C did not flush the G tube with water before or/and after instilling medications. R55 received 15 medications via G tube. Due to LPN-C not flushing with water after instilling medications, all 15 medications are medication errors which resulted in medication error rate of 41.67%. Findings include: The facility's Tube Feeding: Administering Medications Policy and Procedure with revision date of 9/8/23. 10. Insert syringe (without plunger) and flush tube with 30 ml (milliliters) water or as ordered; do not use cold water which may induce abdominal cramping. R55 physician order dated 11/27/23 documents May combine medications to give all at once during G tube administration with flushes as ordered. On 10/24/24 at 7:59 a.m., Surveyor observed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-C prepare and administer R55 medications via G tube. R55 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R)2) out of five reviewed for medications received ordered medications upon admission. This had the potential for the resident to have unmet care and health needs. Findings include: Review of the Census tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:45 PM. Review of the Diagnosis tab located in the EMR revealed diagnoses of presence of right artificial knee joint, end stage renal disease, and kidney transplant status. Review of R2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2023 with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the following physician ordered medications were not given as ordered the evening of 12/21/23 or 12/22/23 due to not being available and there was no evidence the physician was notified the medications were not available: 1. Belsomra Oral tablet 10 MG [milligrams] 1 tablet at bedtime for insomnia to be given at 8:00 PM. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer one (Resident (R) 1) out of five residents insulin in a timely manner, in accordance with the physician's order. This had the potential for the resident to have unmet health care needs. Findings include: Review of R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) located in the Orders tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an order for insulin Regular Human Injection solution Pen-injector 100 UNITS/ML. Inject as per sliding scale. The order included how much insulin she should receive depending on the results of her finger stick [blood sugar]. According to MAR at 7:30 AM the resident's blood sugar was 215 and she received three units of the insulin and at 11:30 AM her blood sugar was 234 and she received three units of insulin. During an interview on 03/25/24 with R1 at 12:30 PM revealed her lunch tray was on the overbed table. Some of her food was gone and she stated she had finished eating. During the interview she was asked if she received her medications in a timely manner and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure the physician wrote, signed, and dated progress notes at each visit for 4 (R1, R2, R3 and R4) of 4 residents reviewed for MD visit notes. Resident visit notes were not available in Electronic Medical Records (EMR) for R1, R2, R3 and R4 and when requested by Surveyor, were reviewed and signed by the Medical Director on the day requested instead of the visit day. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Medical Director Policy & Procedure with a revision date of 3/26/20. Documented was: Policy The facility must designate a physician to serve as medical director. The medical director is responsible for: - Implementation of resident care policies. - Coordination of medical care in the facility. Support services include: 1. Assisting in development of staff education programs. 2. Communicating to the medical staff additions and revisions to policies, rules, and regulations. 3. Conducting periodic reviews of resident medical records and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 1 of 3 (R19) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Findings include: R19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple pressure injuries including a stage 4 pressure injury to the right hip and a deep tissue injuries (DTI) to his right proximal medial and right distal medial foot. R19's diagnosis include Autistic Disorder, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, pneumonia, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, dysphagia, Myocardial Infarction, UTI (urinary tract infection), contractures, and anemia. R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents Functional Limitation Range of Motion: Impairment both sides upper and lower extremities. Ability to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances or recommendations from resident council meetings were investigated, considered and/or provide follow up for 4 (R70, R93, R88, R63) of 4 Resident in attendance for Resident Council. The facility did not investigate, consider suggestions and/or provide follow up to resident council participants' (R70, R93, R88, R63) grievances and/or concerns that staff were not wearing name tags, staff using personal cell phone in resident care areas, ramp to go outside is hard to get up and door to outside closes too quickly. These concerns were documented several months in a row in the Resident Council Meeting minutes without documented follow up. The grievance documents do not identify how the grievances were investigated, if interviews with staff/residents were completed, or the outcome of the investigation. Resident Council Minutes did not include actions taken regarding the concerns voiced by residents. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Resident Council, dated 2/26/20, states: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 4 (R206, R13, R451 and R452) of 7 Residents reviewed for falls received treatment and care based upon assessment of individual needs. * R206 had a fall on 4/16/23 and post fall monitoring which included vital signs each shift for 72 hours was not always completed. * R13 had a falls on 2/28/23 and 5/9/2. Post fall monitoring which included a Registered Nurse assessment and/or vital signs each shift for 72 hours was not always completed. * R451 had a fall on 7/19/23 and post fall monitoring which included vital signs each shift for 72 hours was not always completed. A Registered Nurse assessment was not completed immediately after the fall. * R452 had a falls on 2/7/23, 2/17/23, 4/6/23, 4/7/23, 4/17/23, 4/23/23 and 4/26/23. Post fall monitoring which included a Registered Nurse assessment and/or vital signs each shift for 72 hours was not always completed. Findings include: On 9/18/23 Surveyor reviewed the facilities policy titled Post Fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not store drugs and biologicals in locked compartments affecting three of three floors of the facility potentially affecting mobile residents. Observations on the first, second, and third floor during the survey process showed medication carts to be unlocked and unsupervised with other unauthorized staff and residents in the vicinity of the carts. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Medication Storage dated 9/21/2019 states: General Guidelines: . 7. Compartments containing medications should be locked when not in use. Trays or carts used to transport such items should not [sic] left unattended. (Note: Compartments include, but are not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes.) . 11. All controlled drugs are stored under double lock and key. On 9/14/2023 at 8:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-Q was observed passing medications on the third floor. LPN-Q gathered the medications for a resident, pushed in the locking mechanism of the cart without engaging the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for 1 (R13) of 1 residents reviewed for elopement and the use of a wanderguard. The facility did not develop a plan of care related for elopement precautions and monitoring related to the use of a wanderguard for R13. Findings Include: The facility policy, entitled Elopement Risk and Prevention, dated 6/2022 states: It is the policy of this facility that all residents are afforded adequate supervision to provide the safest environment possible. All residents will be assessed for behaviors or conditions that put them at risk for wandering/elopement. All residents so identified will have these issues addressed in their individual care plan. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes, altered mental status, chronic kidney disease stage 3, unsteady on feet, repeated falls, cognitive communication deficit and encephalopathy. R13's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1(15) of 7 residents with pressure injuries received the necessary services for healing. R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with six pressure injuries. Four of the pressure injuries were assessed to be unstageable and the other 2 pressure injuries were assessed to be stage 4. The medical record indicates on 1/31/23 R15's pressure injuries were assessed by Wound Physician-M who wrote treatment orders for daily dressing changes. The medical record reveals the treatment orders were transcribed and completed on 2/2/23. R15 did not have treatments completed on 2/1/23. There is no evidence the pressure injuries worsened. Findings include: R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia, schizophrenia and pressure injuries. On 9/19/23, at 8:04 a.m. Surveyor observed pressure injury treatment being completed on R15. Wound Physician-M, Director of Nursing (DON)-B and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-L took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure the physician acted upon recommendations by the pharmacist for 2 (R40, R38) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. *On 7/19/23, Pharmacy recommendations were given for R40 and not followed up upon. *On 8/28/23, Pharmacy recommendations were given for R38 and not followed up upon in a timely fashion. Findings include: 1. R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R40's diagnoses include Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia and venous insufficiency. Surveyor requested to review R40's Pharmacist MRR (Medication Regimen Reviews) from March 2023-August 2023. Pharmacy recommendations were noted for R40 to receive lab work including a Hemoglobin A1C level and Lipid panel for next scheduled lab day on 7/19/22. Surveyor reviewed R40's medical record and noted lab testing has not yet been completed. On 9/19/23 at 2:00 PM, Surveyor conducted interview with NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A. Surveyor asked NHA-A when a physician should be made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$138,434 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $59,813 — penalty dated 2024-01-10
- $78,621 — penalty dated 2023-12-06
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-23 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEINSTEIN, DAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2018 |
| LIFSICS, CHANNIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 9% | since 08/01/2018 |
| POLSTEIN, MORDECHAI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 16% | since 08/01/2018 |
| STESEL, MAXIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45% | since 08/01/2018 |
| REYNOLDS, SANDRA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| RICE, PAMELA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| MAUER, DOVIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525319. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.