Edenbrook Of Edina

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement a fall management program which included development and implementation of care plans, comprehensive fall analysis for root causes, and implementation of appropriate fall interventions to prevent and/or reduce the likelihood of future falls for 5 of 5 residents (R1 had one unwitnessed fall with major injury, R6 who had four unwitnessed falls one with major injury, R2 had 8 unwitnessed falls, R3 had 4 unwitnessed falls, and R4 had 10 unwitnessed falls) who had an identified risk for falls. This resulted in actual harm for R6 who suffered a left tibial fracture and hospitalization and actual harm for R1 when she sustained a spinal fracture and hospitalization. Findings include R6 R6's face sheet dated 1/7/26, identified diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right side, epilepsy (brain disorder causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess for safe self-administration and storage of medications and failed to obtain a physician order for 2 of 3 residents (R24 and R50) reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include:R24's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R24 was cognitively intact. R24's diagnoses included respiratory failure, chronic obstructive respiratory failure (a progressive lung disease that damages airways resulting to shortness of breath, mucus production, wheezing and chest tightness).R24's Order Summary Report dated 1/21/26, included an order for an albuterol sulfate inhaler (Ventolin HFA Inhalation Aerosol Solution) with instructions to take 2 puffs every 4 hours as needed.R24's self-administration assessment dated [DATE], included the selection of Not Applicable for the question regarding the resident's ability to store medications securely in his room. The results of the assessment included resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the skilled nursing facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-10055) was provided to 1 or 3 residents (R59) reviewed for Beneficiary notifications. Findings include:R59's Perspective payment system Part A Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R59 was admitted on [DATE] and Medicare Part A discharge date of 8/13/25.R59's Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN), informed R59 services would end on 8/14/25. However, this notice was given outside of the 48 hours prior to services ending requirement and was provided on 9/22/25.On 1/22/26 at 1:14 p.m. the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) stated the facility had struggled to identify the correct payer source for the resident and once they did, they had R59 sign an SNFABN, however they were unable to locate the form and had R59 sign a new SNFABN on 9/22/25. The MDSC confirmed it was outside the required 48 hours prior to the end of services.On 1/22/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were limited to a 14-day time period for 1 or 5 residents (R34) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:R34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R34 was admitted on [DATE], was severely cognitively impaired and had the following diagnoses: hypertension, renal insufficiency, hyperlipidemia, dementia, anxiety, and depression. R34's order summary report dated 1/22/26, indicated R34 was currently prescribed Lorazepam 0.5mg (milligrams) orally every 1-hour PRN with a start date of 12/17/25. The order lacked an end date. R34's medical record lacked evidence of rationale to continue past the required 14-day timeframe for psychotropic medications.On 1/22/26 at 1:15 p.m. the director of nursing confirmed they were aware of the 14-day time frame for psychotropic medications and stated they missed it with R34 and were currently working on a new process to ensure it does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 2 residents (R3) reviewed for nutrition.Findings include:R3's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R3 was severely cognitively impaired. R3 had diagnoses of diabetes, hyponatremia (happens when excessive water accumulates relative to sodium), and hypertension (high blood pressure).R3's physician order summary report dated 1/22/26, included an order for daily weights due to heart failure with instruction to update the provider with a weight gain of 3 pounds (lbs) or greater in 24 hours or 5 pounds in one week unless otherwise directed by a provider. Order was started on 10/25/25.R3's weights outside of these parameters were as follows:10/28/25: 218.0 lbs10/29/25: 228.4 lbs11/18/25: 212.2 lbs11/19/25: 221.1 lbs11/28/25: 204.9 lbs11/30/25: 213.8 lbs12/7/25: 201.0 lbs12/8/25: 208.6 lbs12/10/25: 206.0 lbs12/12/25: 214.1 lbs12/24/25: 200.2 lbs12/26/25: 245.6 lbs1/20/26: 187.5 lbs1/21/26: 203.0 lbs Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee identified, investigated, analyzed, and responded to increase in resident falls by developing and implementing action plans for process improvement. This had the potential to affect all 60 residents that resident in the facility. Findings include:Based on review of facility records, Quality Review minutes, QAPI documentation, incident reports, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement its QAPI program in accordance with its written plan, including failure to identify falls as a high-risk and problem-prone area, failure to initiate and sustain Performance Improvement Projects, failure to conduct comprehensive root cause analysis, and failure to develop, implement, and monitor effective corrective actions to prevent recurrence. Findings include The facility's QAPI Plan states that Edenbrook of Edina will conduct Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) that are designed to take a systematic approach to revise and improve care or services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to timely report to State Agency (SA) falls with serious injury for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R6) who had falls without implementation of appropriate fall interventions to prevent/mitigate risk of recurrent falls. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 12/31/25, identified diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a progressive nervous system disorder affecting movement that caused tremors, stiffness, slow movement, and balance issues) with dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic muscle movements), congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), atrial flutter (a fast heart rhythm), and diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects how the body uses sugar as fuel). R1's Morse fall scale (fall risk assessment) dated 12/5/25, indicated R1 had not fallen in the past 3 months, had more than one diagnosis, normal gait, and overestimated or forgets her limits. R1 was at moderate risk for falling. R1's admission Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 of 5 residents (R4.R6) who were reviewed for accidents/falls.Findings include:R4's face sheet dated 12/31/25, indicated R4 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, seizures, mechanical complications of indwelling urethral catheter, insomnia, bipolar disorder, obstructive and reflux uropathy, presence of right artificial knee joint, heart failure, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, myalgia (muscle pain), psychoactive substance abuse and reduced mobility. R4 fall focus care plan dated 11/3/25, identified R4 was high-risk for falls related to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, sepsis, seizures, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, history of pulmonary embolism, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. R4's goal was for her injury related to falls will heal without complication by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 3 residents assessed (R1 and R3). R1's room was observed having the bed made over a urine-soiled facility bath blanket. R3's room was cluttered with facility supplies covering up furniture and clean supplies found on the floor. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMs) score of 10 indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1 required maximum assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene and transferring. R1's pertinent diagnoses were left femur (hip) fracture, chronic respiratory failure, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. R1 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's care plan revision dated 11/13/24 indicated R1 had functional bladder incontinence. Her interventions were to clean peri-area with each incontinent episode. Monitor for signs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed to implement cares and services for a leg prosthetic for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed. R3's care plan did not have any person-centered details for R3's prosthetic placement or use. In addition, R3's comprehensive assessment did not indicate R3 had a leg prosthetic. Findings include: R3's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated R3 had a BIMs score of 15 indicating R3 had no cognitive impairment. R3's behavior status indicated he rejected cares 1-3 days out of 7. R3 was totally dependent upon staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showering, lower body dressing, personal hygiene and transferring. R3 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R3 was not on a bowel toileting program. R3's pertinent diagnoses were chronic congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure, acute pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs), type II Diabetes, morbid obesity, absence of left foot, contracture (shortening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet a resident needs and choices to perform activities of daily living of toileting for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed when R3 wore an incontinent brief for toileting. R3 had a below the knee leg prosthesis and was unable to use his preferred method of toileting due to staff not able to apply the prosthesis in a timely manner to transfer R3 to the toilet or commode chair (a portable toilet chair) as indicated on R3's care plan. Findings include: R3's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated R3 had a BIMs score of 15 indicating R3 had no cognitive impairment. R3's behavior status indicated he rejected cares 1-3 days out of 7. R3 was totally dependent upon staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showering, lower body dressing, personal hygiene and transferring. R3 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R3 was not on a bowel toileting program. R3's pertinent diagnoses were chronic congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure, acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $577K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN