No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edenbrook Of Yeadon

Lansdowne And Lincoln Ave, Yeadon, PA 19050 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 190 certified beds · (610) 626-7700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$34,298 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Jul 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,298 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1501 Lansdowne Avenue, Medical Office Bldg, Suite 305 · (610) 237-2514 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
119 E Baltimore Ave · (610) 622-8191 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
300 E Baltimore Ave · (610) 623-9223 · Call to confirm hours
Park
400 S Union Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
71 S Union Ave · (610) 394-9080

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.0%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.0%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.1%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.4%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.311.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.831.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.8%CMS range 29.7–53.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.0–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 5.6–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
41.0%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 142.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure water temperatures in the central shower room and resident bathroom sinks were maintained at a safe temperature for one of four nursing units observed (TCU Nursing Unit). This failure placed residents on the TCU Nursing Unit at risk for serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Water Temps - Bathing dated February 1, 2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe and comfortable temperature for residents during bathing and procedures to protect them from avoidable injury whenever possible. The facility will monitor domestic hot water temperatures prior to bathing/showering residents and testing will be conducted on a routine basis by the Maintenance Department. Domestic hot water ideally will be maintained at 105 degrees to 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Acceptable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policies, interview with staff and resident, it was determined the facility failed provide tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident observed. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R130 who was decannulated, experienced respiratory and emotional distress and potential death. (Resident R130) Findings include: Review facility, policy title Tracheostomy dated April 1, 2022, revealed that under section Policy Statement it was stated that it was the policy of the corporation to establish standards for the care and maintenance of tracheostomy tubes. Following these standards will assist in maintaining a patent airway, reduce the risk of this for nosocomial infection, and help to prevent excoriation, breakdown, and infection of surrounding skin. Under section Procedure Trach care is performed every shift (TID-three times a day) and as needed. Partial trach care does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R1 was free from abuse. Resident R1 was included in a social media post in which he was photographed from behind, partially exposing his buttocks and without a shirt. The image also contained profanity. A reasonable person in Resident R1's position would likely feel humiliated by having such a photograph taken and posted on social media without consent. Posting this image of a cognitively impaired Resident R1 caused harm. This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention revised 03/25/2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Further, it is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect during provision of care for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R1). This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1, who sustained a fall resulting in actual harm, transfer to the hospital and was diagnosed with a left femur fracture. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse revised October 24, 2022, revealed that abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychological well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accident hazards for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R1) who sustained a fall resulting in actual harm, transfer to the hospital and diagnosed with a left femur fracture. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, including Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), Post-Traumatic Hydrocephalus (a serious complication that follows a traumatic brain injury), History of Falling, and Idiopathic Neuropathy (Nerve damage interferes with the functioning of the peripheral nervous system; when the cause cannot be determined, it is called idiopathic neuropathy). A review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set ( MDS-a periodic review of a resident's assessment and care needs), dated September 3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observations, review of clinical record, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure dignity and privacy was maintained for one resident who had an audiology consult in a public activities area for one of 36 residents (Resident R13). Findings include:Review of Resident R13's April 2026 physician orders included the following diagnosis: diabetes (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar/glucose; depression; chronic kidney disease ( a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and gradually lose their ability to function properly over time), and hypertension (high blood pressure).During an observation on April 22, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. the resident was observed sitting in the activity office on the 2nd floor. The resident was observed sitting in the room receiving an audiology assessment. The audiologist was also sitting next to the resident with her computer on the desk. Observed in the room with the resident and audiologist were two barbers/beauticians were talking and transporting residents in and out of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical record, review of facility documents, facility investigations, facility policy and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were free from misappropriation of resident property related to narcotic diversion for one of 36 residents (Resident R14). This deficiency was identified as Past Non-compliance.Findings include:Review of facility policy on Controlled Substance Management with most recent revision date of August 7 2024, revealed that under section Policy: to provide guidance for record keeping receipt handling storing and disposal of control substances in accordance with federal state DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) and board of pharmacy regulations under section Storage and Inventory, #1 store medications listed in schedules II, III, IV and V under double lock separate from other medications. #2 when a controlled medication is administered, the details of the administration should be documented on the accountability record.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure was properly assessed after a 27.4-pound weight gain in a two-month time period, for one out of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R3).Findings include:Review of the facility's Resident Height and Weight policy with a revision date of January 7, 2025 indicated that all residents will be weighed upon admission and subsequently as the policy directs to provide a baseline and ongoing record for monitoring stability of weight as an indicator of nutritional status and medical condition over a period of time. The policy also stated that any weight change of 5lbs or more will be retaken and if a reweight verifies a significant, unplanned weight change, this is communicated to the resident's physician, power of attorney, dietician, and any others deemed necessary by the disciplinary team. Continued review of the policy indicated that the weight change will be assessed and reviewed by the dietician in cooperation with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents receiving a tube feeding was placed in proper position to avoid aspiration for one resident (Resident R2).Review facility policy on two feeding Revealed that under section purpose to provide guidelines to ensure safe and effective administration of medications administered via Interlube under section procedure number 5 ensure head of bed is elevated unless contraindicated.Review of resident R2S clinical record revealed that resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of but not limited to Dysphagia and get stressed and Gastrostomy Status.Review of Resident R2's MDS minimum data set significant change assessment dated [DATE], section K0520. Nutritional Approaches revealed that Resident R2 was on Feeding tube (PEG percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy- A flexible tube Inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews with staff, and review of clinical records, facility documentation, and policy it was determined that the facility did not implement an effective infection control program related to use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and wound care for two of thirty-six residents observed (Resident R2 and Resident R5).Findings include: Review facility policy on Isolation Precaution with a most recent revision date of May 8, 2024, revealed that under section Purpose: To establish transmission-based precaution for residents who are suspected or confirmed to have communicable diseases/infections that can be transmitted to others. Under section Procedure: #1 Transmission based precaution will be used when transmission cannot reasonably be prevented by standard precaution alone. Under section Contact Precaution: #1 Implemented for residents suspected of or confirmed to be infected with a communicable disease that can be transmitted by direct contact with a resident or indirect contact with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were free from neglect one of 5 residents reviewed. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. (Resident R3)Clinical record review revealed that Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic condition in which the immune system attacks the lining of joints, causing pain, inflammation, stiffness, and potential deformity), and Huntington's Disease (an inherited, fatal disorder that causes progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain).Review of facility incident report revealed that during continence care on January 9, 2026, Resident R3 was repositioned by nurse aide, Employee E3, who then slid with her pillow to the floor. Continued review of the report revealed that the identified probable cause of the fall was that the plan of care was not followed (requires 2 person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary, and comfortable environment on one of two nursing floors observed. (1st Floor) Findings include:Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of but not limited to Schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by loss of reality). Review of Resident R1's MDS section C0500 BIMS (brief interview of mental status) revealed a score of 11 suggesting that Resident R1 had moderately impaired cognition. Observation of the first-floor unit conducted on August 6, 2025, at 9:10 AM reveled that the ice machine located between the nurse's station and room [ROOM NUMBER] had water leaking on the floor. Further, a white towel and a blue gown was on the floor in front of the ice machine. Further observation revealed that parts of the flooring in front of the ice machine had been peeled off with the understructure exposed. Observation of the back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, obsesrvations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain, follow, and clarify physician orders related to medications and skin checks for two of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R84 and R64). Findings Include: Review of facility document titled Administering Medications revised January 22, 2024, revealed medications shall be administered per providers written or verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, root, time and positive verification of resident's identity. Medications may only be administered to the individual in which the medication was prescribed. Review of facility policy titled Physician Orders last revised November 13,2024, revealed the policy is to provide guidance to ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards. Clear and complete orders will be transcribed to the appropriate administration record medication administration record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure professional practice standards related to pain management for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R260). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Pain Management and Assessment dated revised April 27, 2022, revealed that the purpose of the policy is to develop a standardized method for assessing, monitoring, evaluating, managing and documenting pain. Continued review revealed that staff should, Assess and document pain including onset and duration, location, severity, alleviating and aggravating factors, possible causes, and accompanying signs and symptoms. Further review revealed, Non-pharmacological interventions will be attempted prior to use of PRN [as needed] analgesics whenever appropriate. Use of interventions and effectiveness will be documented. Interview on April 28, 2025, at 12:44 p.m. Resident R260 stated that she frequently has pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain effective communication with a dialysis provider for two of two resident reviewed. (Residents R138, and R38) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care of Hemodialysis Resident revised January 28, 2025, revealed the facility will provide an ongoing assessment of residents' condition and will monitor for complication before and after each dialysis treatment. Continued review of this policy revealed that the facility will have an ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. Review of Resident R138's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool) dated February 1, 2025, revealed that the resident reentered the facility on January 28, 2025, and had diagnoses' including kidney disease (nephropathy-the kidneys are damaged and cant filter waste, fluids, and toxins from the body), diabetes(chronic disease characterized by abnormal high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of arbitration agreements for five of six arbitration agreements reviewed (Residents R37, R122, R48, R136 and R410). Findings include: Binding Arbitration Agreements are agreements by which the parties agree to submit to arbitration (private process where disputing parties agree that another individual can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) to resolve disputes between them within a defined legal relationship. The decision is final and can be enforced by court. Review of facility documentation dated March 20, 2025, revealed a list of Residents who are currently residing in the facility that have entered into a binding arbitration agreement on or after 9/16/2019: Residents R150, R37, R122, R48, R136 and R410 were selected for review from the list. On May 1, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. arbitration agreements for Residents R150, R37, R122 and R410 were provided for review. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident representatives had the opportunity to participate in the care planning process for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R31). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Care Conference revised June 20, 2023, revealed the purpose of the policy is to provide interdisciplinary communication with the resident and/or legal representative for purposes of the development of an individualized comprehensive plan of care. The resident and/or their representative will receive communication in advance of the scheduled care conference. Review of Resident R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated January 15, 2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses of dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities), anxiety (intense, excessive, persistent worry or fear), and depression (mood disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in resident care areas and dining experience for one of four nursing units observed (Main Unit). Findings Include: Observations on April 28, 2025, at 11:08 a.m. revealed Resident R95's breakfast tray, with leftover food on the tray, was left on the windowsill in the dining room on the Main Unit. Continued observations in the dining room on the Main Unit revealed the railing on the wall was broken. Further observations on April 28, 2025, at 12:35 p.m. as resident's gathered in the dining room to have lunch on the Main Unit revealed Resident R95's breakfast tray was still left on the windowsill. Observations were confirmed by Registered Nurse, Employee E6. Observations on April 28, 2025, at 12:45 p.m. revealed broken floor tiles in the shower room on the Main Unit. Observations on April 28, 2025, at 12:49 p.m. in Resident R16's room revealed the wallpaper behind the bed was peeling, the privacy curtain was stained, and there was a brown substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from verbal abuse, for two of four residents reviewed for abuse (Residents R135 and R361). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention dated revised February 25, 2025, revealed that abuse includes, Conduct which is not an accident or therapeutic conduct as defined in this section, which produces or could reasonably be expected to produce physical pain or injury or emotional distress including, but not limited to, the following . use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or gestured language toward a vulnerable adult or the treatment of a vulnerable adult which would be considered by a reasonable person to be disparaging, use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or derogatory, humiliating, harassing, or threatening language. Review of Resident R135's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraint for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R310). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Physical Restraints revealed physical restraints are only used when they are used appropriately to treat the resident's medical symptoms and to promote an optimal level of function for the resident. A restraint may never be used for the purpose of discipline or staff convenience. Per the facility policy, a physical restraint includes all devices and practices that restrict freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Review of Resident R310's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated March 2, 2025, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, had impairment in functional limitation in range of motion to the upper and lower extremities, and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated transfers to the hospital and that a resident's representative was made aware of a facility-initiated transfer in writing, for two of two clinical records reviewed. Resident R37 and Resident R119. Findings Include: Interview with Facility Administrator Employee E1 conducted on May 1, 2025 at 2:24pm revealed that the facility does not have a policy on discharge notification. Review of Resident R119's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Cerebral Atherosclerosis, Poly-osteoarthritis. Further review of Resident R119's clinical record revealed that Resident R119 was transferred to a local hospital on February 9, 2025, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R37's clinical record revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan related to behaviors for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R135). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Plan - Baseline and Comprehensive dated revised June 20, 203, revealed that care plans will be developed to ensure that each resident receives care individualized to him or herself and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties including caregivers, the resident, and the resident's representative. Review of Resident R135's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool) dated October 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures) and encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely provide feeding assistance for a dependent resident for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R78). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revealed the facility will provide care and services for eating, assistance with feeding or preparation of meals. Based on the assessments, a personalized care plan is created and outlines the level of assistance needed for activities of daily living. Review of Resident R78's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated March 7, 2025, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximal (helper does more than half the effort) assistance with eating (the ability to bring food to mouth). Review of Resident R78's comprehensive care plan revised May 1, 2025, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to contractures to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement both group and individual activities to meet the needs of each resident for 15 of 39 residents on the Main Nursing Unit (Resident R31, R78, R51, R71, R21, R142, R88, R4, R111, R133, R125, R131, R117, R64, and R150). Findings Include: Review of the April 2025 Activities Calendar revealed on April 29, 2025, Coffee & Chat was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. and Fun & Fit Exercise was scheduled for 11:15 a.m. on the Main Nursing Unit. Observations on April 29, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. revealed Resident R21, R88, R125, R64, and R131 were sitting in the dining room with no music and no television. These residents were observed to be sitting quietly with no stimulation. Follow up observations on April 29, 2025, at 11:45 a.m. revealed Residents R51, R71, R21, R142, R88, R4, R111, R133, R125, R131, R117, R64, and R150 were sitting in the dining room with only the television on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received treatment and services to maintain or improve range of motion/mobility for one of one resident reviewed with limited range of motion (Resident R101). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Specialized Rehabilitative and Restorative Services, dated April 1, 2022 indicated that the facility will provide restorative services, such as, but no limited to walking, transfer training, bowel and/or bladder training, bed mobility, range of motion, splint and brace, eating and/or swallowing, amputation/prostheses care and communication, when necessary, as indicted by the assessment of the interdisciplinary team. Review of Resident R101's clinical record revealed that Resident R101 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R101's current diagnoses were but not limited to Rheumatoid arthritis, COPD,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain orders for oxygen for one of three residents reviewed who was receiving oxygen therary (Resident R410). Findings include: Review of Resident R410 clinical record revealed that Resident R410 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Pleural Effusion Further review of Resident R410's clinical record revealed that Resident R410 was transferred to a local hospital on April 14, 2025, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R410's physician order revealed an order for Oxygen humidification: O2 (oxygen) liters via trach collar at 4LPM (liters per minute) every shift related to Trachesotomy status. Order Date-03/18/2025 . Further, there was no order for O2(Oxygen) upon return on April 23, 2025. Review of Resident R410's April 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that resident was on Oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for two of five newly hired personnel files reviewed (Employees E16 and E17). Findings include: Review of the facility's job description for nurse aides, dated May 5, 2015, revealed that nurse aides provide care to residents including: bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting, feeding, incontinence care, transferring, ambulation, range of motion, turning, repositioning, obtaining vital signs, weights, applying creams and collecting specimens. Review of facility documentation revealed that Employees E16 and E17 were hired by the facility as nurse aides on March 25, 2025. Personnel files, including documentation of skills competencies evaluations, for Employees E16 and E17, nurse aides, were requested on April 29 and 30, 2025. Personnel files were provided for review on May 1, 2025. There was no evidence of any skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that trash was properly disposed of in the receiving and dumpster area. Findings Include: A tour of the main kitchen was conducted on April 28, 2025, at 9:32 a.m. with the Food Service Director, Employee E13. The tour included observations of the outside area where food deliveries are accepted and where the dumpsters are stored. Observations in the receiving area outside revealed trash, food, and debris on the ground surrounding the dumpsters. On one dumpster, the door on the back was open, and trash was exposed. 28 PA Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff were qualified to provide feeding assistance for one of one employee reviewed (Employee E27). Findings Include: Review of Resident R124's comprehensive care plan revised December 30, 2024, revealed the resident exhibited dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) when consuming foods by mouth putting the resident at risk for aspiration (inhaling food or saliva into the airway or lungs) and weight loss. Continued review of Resident R124's comprehensive care plan revised June 30, 2023, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit and required supervision assistance with eating. Review of Resident R125's comprehensive care plan revised April 10, 2025, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit and required set-up/assistance with eating. Review of Resident R125's physician order summary revealed a diet order dated April 24, 2025, that the resident required a mechanically altered diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for one of five residents on enhance barrier precaution observed (Residents R410). Findings Include: Review of facility Policy on Enhanced Barrier Precaution with an issue date of March 26, 2024 revealed that under section Policy, It is the Policy of this facility that Enhanced barrier Precautions, in addition to Standard and Contact Precautions will be implemented during high0contact resident activities when caring for residents that have an increased risk for acquiring a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) such as residents with Chronic wounds requiring a dressing, indwelling medical device or residents with infection or colonization with an MDRO. Under section Definition, Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) refer to an infect ion control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organism that employs targeted gown and glove use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the physical environment, interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: Review of Resident R37's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to cardiovascular disease, and gastrostomy status. Observation conducted on April 28, 2025, at 11:13 a.m. during the tour of the first-floor unit revealed that Resident R37 was in bed asleep. Further observation revealed that Resident R37 was on tube feeding with feeding bag of Jevity 100 cc hanging on a pole, the tubing was primed (feeding formula was in the tubing) but not connected to the pump. Further observation revealed a fly on Resident R'37's sheet. Further, three other flies were observed flying about Resident R37. Further observation of Resident R37's bedroom revealed that the screen on one of the windows in her room had a hole. Interview with unit manager Employee E5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate treatment administration for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of CL1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, and a chest surgical incision related to severe aortic valve stenosis; Resident CL1 underwent arctic valve replacement and CABG (Coronary Artery Bipass Surgery). Review of Resident CL1's physician orders revealed an order dates January 22, 2025, which indicated, Wash all incisions with mild soap as Dove or Ivory. No lotions, ointments, creams, gel, colognes or powder at the sites. DO NOT emerge incision into water; every day and evening shift for 4 Weeks. Review of the Treatment administration record revealed that incision care was completed on January 23, 2025, through January 31, 2025. Further review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for three of three residents with sacral wounds observed (Residents R1, R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated March 6, 2024, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that Enhanced Barrier Precautions, in addition to Standard and Contact Precautions will be implemented during high-contact resident care activities when caring for residents that have an increased risk for acquiring a multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) such as a resident with chronic wounds requiring a dressing, indwelling medical devices or residents with 'infection or colonization with an MDRO'. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment related to water temperatures for two of four nursing units observed (First and Second Floor Nursing Units). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Water Temps - Bathing dated February 1, 2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe and comfortable temperature for residents during bathing and procedures to protect them from avoidable injury whenever possible. The facility will monitor domestic hot water temperatures prior to bathing/showering residents and testing will be conducted on a routine basis by the Maintenance Department. Domestic hot water ideally will be maintained at 105 degrees to 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Acceptable range is 100-110 degrees. Interview on March 5, 2025, at 10:22 a.m. Resident R13 stated that there was no hot water in her bathroom sink. Observation on March 5, 2025, at 10:24 a.m. in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records, job description, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure that water temperatures in the central shower room and resident bathroom sinks were maintained at a safe temperature for one of four nursing units observed (TCU Nursing Unit). This failure placed residents on the TCU Nursing Unit at risk for serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description of the nursing home administrator indicated that the Nursing Home Administrator manages all business-related activity to achieve the faciltiy's vision and supporting strategies and assures that the company image as an ethical and high quality provider of health services is maintained. Safety and Sanitation included to follow established safety policies and procedures. Ensures potential safety/health hazards are eliminated. Under Administrator Provision of Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to obtaining medical records in a timely manner for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the resident's August 2024 indicated that the resident was admitted into the facility on April 23 2023, with the diagnose of viral hepatitis; psychoactive substance dependence, depression and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the resident's clinical notes indicated that in March 2023, the resident fell six stories from a window and sustained multiple injuries and fractures as a result and was transferred to the facility for rehabilitation services. Review of an orthopedic consultation visit dated June 3, 2024 where the resident was seen for follow up for ankle and foot treatment/care related to his fall from March 2023. Review of the consultation from the resident's current orthopedic physician who treated the resident's on June 3, 2024, documented that the medical records were needed from a 1st named local hospital/physician prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, reviews of hospital records and facility policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to permit one of three residents reviewed to return to the facility after they were hospitalized . (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled Bed Hold and readmission Policy revealed that for those residents that are transferred with an expectation of returning to the facility, the facility must comply with the requirements related to discharge. Clinical record review for Resident R1 revealed that this resident was admitted from the hospital on July 12, 2024, with diagnoses to include adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (a stressor-induced disorder that creates personal distress through symptoms of both anxiety and depression). The nursing note dated July 14, 2024, written by the nursing supervisor, Employee E11, indicated, Myself, nurse and CNA went into resident's room to give care. During incontinent care, resident hit CNA in her stomach. Md made aware, new order to send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that personal privacy was maintained related to patient care and tracheostomy care for one of 35 residents observed. (Resident R130) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Dignity dated April 1, 2022, reveal that under section Policy: each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation #11. Staff shall promote, maintain, and protect residents' privacy, including bodily privacy, during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. Observation of tracheostomy care conducted on June 25, 2024, at 12:36 p.m. with Licensed nurse, Employee E14 and Unit Manager, Employee E15 and in the presence of Resident R130's husband revealed that Resident R130's bed was located close to the door and her roommate's bed was located closest to the window. Further observation revealed that Resident R130's privacy curtain on the side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments were completed in a timely manner for one of three discharged records reviewed (Residents R77). Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion revealed that, According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) specified by the State. Clinical record review for Resident R77 revealed a nursing note written on April 2, 2024, indicating that the resident was discharged in stable condition ambulating independently with daughter, with all belongings, scripts, paperwork and medications. Further review of the clinical record for Resident R77 revealed an April 2, 2024, MDS (Minimum Data Set, comprehensive assessment of resident) that indicated the discharge status as 04 - Short-Term General Hospital. Interview on June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was revealed that the facility failed to revise a resident's PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) with mental health diagnosis for one of 35 resident's records reviewed (Resident R77). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, PASARR date on April 1, 2022, stated the facility will coordinate assessment with the pre-admission screening and resident (PASARR) program. Referring all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II residents review upon a significant change in status assessment. Review of the clinical record on June 25, 2024 for Resident R77 revealed diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (schizoaffective -a mental disorder condition mix schizophrenia symptoms by delusions, hallucinations and mood disorder); major depressive disorder (depression-a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest); anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a resident's care plan related to oxygen therapy for one of 35 clinical records reviewed. (Resident R112). Findings include: Observation on June 24, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. revealed Resident R112 in bed receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula. Observation of the oxygen concentrator revealed that it was set at 2 liters per minute. Review of Resident R112's current care plan revealed that there was no care developed for oxygen therapy. Interview on June 25, 2024 at 2:20 p.m. with Licensed nurse, Employee E19 confirmed that Resident R112's care plan was not updated to include oxygen administration. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews with staff and resident, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician order was obtained realated to oxygen therapy for one of 35 clinical records reviewed. (Resident R112). Findings include: Observation on June 24, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. revealed Resident R112 was in bed and receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula. Review of Resident R112's clinical record did not reveal oxygen therapy was included with physician orders. Interview on June 25, 2024 at 2:20 p.m. with Employee E19 confirmed that Resident R112 was receiving oxygen therapy without a physician order. 28 Pa Code 211.3(b) Oral and telephone orders 28 Pa Code 211.5(f)(i) Clinical records

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide sufficient services to restore bladder function for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R61) Findings include: Review of Residents R61's clinical record revealed a medical history of calculus of ureter (kidney stones), benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, presence of urogenital implants, urinary tract infections, colostomy status. During observations of wound care treatment on June 25, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., Resident R61 had bloody urine in the suprapubic catheter. Interview conducted with Licensed nurse, Employee 12 was assigned to care for Resident R61 stated that it's always been like that . Review of R61's nursing notes, dated June 6, 2024, at 3:17 p.m. and June 3, 2024 at 8:33 a.m. indicate that some sm (small) blood strands noted in urine; unit mgr (manager) aware-will obtain C&S (culture and sensitivity). Already on abt. (antibiotic). Review of R61's care plan included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of professional literature, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a PICC line in accordance with professional practice standards for two of four residents with peripheral central cathether lines (Resident R179). Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, Documentation Guidelines for Infusion Therapy revealed that Midline Catheters and PICCs (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line) documentation at established intervals, including the external length of the catheter and the original length of the catheter inserted, and arm circumference to check for edema and rule out deep vein thrombosis. According to the standards of nursing practice guidelines in the Journal of the American Nurse's Association, dated November 2013, complications of a PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line, type of IV used for long term use) includes, but is not limited to catheter-tip migration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The Policy: Food Storage, which was dated January 17, 2019, states, All foods should be covered, labeled and dated and Frozen food must be maintained at a temperature to keep the food frozen solid. An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on June 24, 2024, at 9:45 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director (FSD), which revealed the following: Observation in the walk-in refrigerator revealed an open box of hot dogs with the inner plastic lining open to the air and no date when product was open. Observation in the walk-in freezer revealed an internal thermometer reading 17 degrees above zero and there were several food items not frozen solid including donut holes, sausage links and tater tots. Interview with the FSD on June 24, 2024, at 9:55 a.m. confirmed that these food items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures during tracheostomy care for one of one resident observed with a tracheostomy. The facility failed to ensure the proper processing of lines and accessibility to hand washing station in the laundry. (Resident R130) Findings include: Review of Facility Policy on Infection Control Program Overview dated October 24, 2022, revealed that under section Purpose: The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Under section Goals: The goal of the infection control program are to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment, prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, ensure compliance with state and federal regulations relating to infection control. Under sections Scope of the infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe sanitary and functional environment for 6 residents and 15 residents rooms of two floors (Resident R1, R2, R3, R10, R14, R15; First, A, B, C and Second floor nursing units). Finding Include: Interview with Resident R1 on March 15, 2024, at 10:41 a.m. observations were made a dirty left over breakfast and of a take out order of scrambled eggs, steak and pasta . Resident R1 reported that it has been on her bedside dresser for two days and it's still here. Observations of Resident R1's restroom revealed a takeout container with dirty water being soaked on the top the toilet lid. Resident R1 reported that that container belonged to her roommate, Resident R2 who was interviewed at this time and reported that she does not desire to keep that container and is unsure why it's on the toilet. The restroom also had two basins on the floor. Interview and observations were completed on March 15, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to establish grievance policies and procedures that include the right to file a grievance for 2 of 13 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Grievance Policy revealed each resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal . Interview with Resident R2 on March 15, 2024, at 10:41 a.m. revealed that call bell response being a problem, last weekend it took two hours to get a response. Resident R2 did notify administration and he reported that I'll take care of it. Interview with Resident R1 on March 15, 2024, at 10:43 a.m. revealed that call bell response being a problem and last weekend it took couple of hours for her call bell to be answered. The call bell response is the worse during the shift form 3PM-11PM, 11PM-7AM and weekends. Resident R1 also complained about food taste being horrible and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice, including reason for the change, prior to moving a resident to another room, for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident R40). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Room change/Roommate Assignment dated April 1, 2022, revealed, Prior to changing a room or roommate assignment all parties involved in the change/assignment will be given advance notice of such change. Continued review revealed, The notice of a change in room or roommate assignment may be oral or in writing, or both, and will include the reason(s) for such change. Further review revealed, Information regarding transfers will be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident R40's care plan revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that he had impaired visual function, hearing deficits and ambulation deficits. Continued review of Resident R40's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record reviews of newly hired employees, interviews with staff and reviews of facility policies and procedures, it was determined that for one of five employee records reviewed that the facility failed to initiate and complete a federal criminal back ground check. Finding include: A review of the policy titled abuse revealed that it was the facility's responsibility to ensure that each resident was free from abuse. The policy also indicated that the residents will be protected from abuse, neglect and harm by the facility's implementation of abuse and neglect detection and prevention by prescreening of newly hired employees. The procedure for employee screening included a criminal background check for prospective employee in accordance with State and Federal Regulations. A review of the employee E7's personnel file revealed that this employee was hired on August 16, 2023, as a licensed practical nurse. The file indicated that Employee E7 had lived out of Pennsylvania during the prior two years before employement at the facility. There was no documented federal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and the review of clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and through investigation for an injury of unknown origin for 1 out of 39 residents reviewed (Resident R17). Findings include: Review of the facility's abuse policy with a revision date of October 24, 2022, indicated that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated. Review of the September 2023 physician orders for Resident R17 included the following diagnosis: chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function occurs over a period); diabetes (a chronic health condition that is characterized by sustained high blood sugar levels); dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning); osteoarthritis and osteopenia (an individual's bones are weaker than normal, but not so far gone that they break easily). Review of the resident's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of a resident's needs) dated, April 26, 2023 indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans related to caregiver preferences, and substance use disorder for two of 38 residents reviewed (Residents R9 and R183). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Baseline Care Plan, Comprehensive Care Plan and Ongoing Care Plan Updates dated April 1, 2022, revealed, The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, an mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident R9's care plan, dated last revised May 3, 2023, revealed that the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to a right leg amputation (surgical removal or part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders related to blood sugar monitoring (Resident R9) and failed to follow physician orders related to weights (Resident R22) for two of 38 residents reviewed. Findings include: Observation of morning medication pass, on September 12, 2023, at 10:04 a.m. revealed Employee E13, licensed nurse, obtained Resident R9's blood sugar. Review of Resident R9's active physician orders on September 12, 2023, at 12:22 p.m. revealed that the resident was not prescribed any blood sugar checks. Review of progress notes for Resident R9 revealed a nurse practitioner note, dated September 11, 2023, at 2:29 p.m. which indicated that the resident had a diagnoses of diabetes (ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose), was prescribed diabetes medications including Januvia, metformin and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Basedoninterviewswithresidentsandstaffandreviewofclinicalrecords itwasdeterminedthatthefacilityfailedtoensurethatoneresidentparticipatedintherestorativecarenursingprogramtomaintain improve orpreventavoidabledeclineinrangeofmotionandmobilityfor2 outof38 reviewed(ResidentR6 andR61). Findingsinclude Reviewofthefacilitypolicy SpecializedRehabilitativeandRestorativeServices datedApril1, 2022 indicatedthatthefacilitywillproviderestorativeservices suchas butnolimitedtowalking transfertraining bowelandorbladdertraining bedmobility rangeofmotion splintandbrace eatingandorswallowing amputationprosthesescareandcommunication whennecessary asindictedbytheassessmentoftheinterdisciplinaryteam ReviewoftheSeptember2023 physicianordersforResidentR61 includedthefollowingdiagnosis hypertension(highbloodpressure; seizures(asudden uncontrolledburstofelectricalactivityinthebrainthatcancausechangesinbehavior movements feelingsandlevelsofconsciousness; schizophrenia(amentaldisordercharacterizedbyfalsebeliefs sensingsomethingthatisnotreallypresent disorganizedthoughts speechandbehavior;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview with staff and residents, and review of clinical record, it was determined that the facility did not provide a safe environment related to possession of disposable razors for one of 38 residents (Resident R133). Findings include: An observation on September 13, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. revealed a disposable razor on top of a dresser in Resident R133's room. Interview on September 13, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. with Resident R133 revealed, That is my razor. I shaved myself today. Nobody is going to put a razor to my face except me. Review of Resident R133's clinical health record revealed Resident R133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: arthritis due to bacteria right knee; chronic pain syndrome; type 2 diabetes mellitus; major depressive disorder, recurrent; post-traumatic stress disorder; other psychoactive substance dependence; gastro-esophageal reflux disease; nicotine dependence, cigarettes; unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility; nontraumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and residents and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for body weight and laboratory values for two of eight residents reviewed. (Residents R96 and R97) Findings include: A review of the undated policy titled nutritional assessment revealed that the registered dietitian was responsible for documentation of the assessment of each resident's nutritional status upon admission and during the resident's stay. The registered dietitian was also responsible for the implementation of nutrition interventions, monitoring and evaluations to ensure that the optimal, resident centered care was provided for each resident. Clinical record review for Resident R96 revealed a quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] that indicated this resident was cognitively impaired This assessment also indicated that Resident R96 was not on a physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication administration, review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 6.45 percent based on observation of 31 medication administration opportunities with two medication errors observed. Review of facility policy, Administering Medications dated April 1, 2022, revealed, The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method of administration before giving the medication. Observation of the morning medication pass on September 12, 2023, at 9:26 a.m. revealed Employee E12, licensed nurse, prepared one tablet of enteric coated aspirin (a medication to prevent and to treat heart attacks, to prevent strokes, and to treat inflammation) 81 mg (milligrams) and one tablet of omeprazole (medication used to treat acid reflux) delayed release 20 mg for Resident R18. Employee E12,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policies, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored and labeled in two of five medication carts reviewed (Second floor B and C Wing medication carts). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Storage dated September 6, 2019, revealed, All medications will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel. Review of facility policy, Administering Medications dated April 1, 2022, revealed, When opening a multi-dose container, place the date on the container. Review of facility policy, Insulin (injectable medication used to lower blood sugar levels) vials - Expiration Dates After Opening dated July 6, 2023, revealed: Vials of Lantus insulin expire 28 days after opened; Vials of Novolog insulin expire 28 days after opened; Vials of Humalog insulin expire 28 days after opened; Vials of Humulin 70/30 insulin expire 31 days after opened; Vials of Lispro insulin expire 28 days after opened. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations of the food and nutrition department, reviews of food committee meeting minutes and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diets that met their daily nutritional and special dietary needs for 2 of four nursing units observed (first floor nursing and second floor nursing unit ). Findings include: Interview on September 11, 2023, at 11:13 a.m. Resident R164 stated that the food was not good, juice and condiments were not served at meals and that milk products served were not consistent. Interview on September 11, 2023, at 12:24 p.m. Resident R61 stated that the food was terrible, that meals were often served late, that milk and other meal items were often missing and that foods served do not match the menus. Observation of the second floor unit B wing hallway revealed that the food truck of lunch trays arrived at 12:11 p.m. Staff began distributing the trays to residents at 12:18 p.m., seven minutes after the trays had arrived.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with staff and review of facility policy and procedures revealed that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices related to hand hygiene for one of 38 residents (Resident R285). Findings include: Review of Hand Hygiene Policy dated April 1, 2022 revealed, It is the policy of the facility that handwashing/hand hygiene be regarded as the single most important means of preventing the spread of infections. All employees will wash their hands and any other skin with antimicrobial soap and, or flush mucous membranes immediately or as soon as feasible following contact of such body areas with blood or other potentially infectious materials. Purpose: To prevent and to control the spread of infectious disease. To provide guidelines to staff for proper and appropriate handwashing and hygiene techniques that will aid in the prevention of the transmission of infections. When: 1. Employees must perform at least appropriate twenty second hand washing procedures using antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial soap and water under the following conditions:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, review of facility polices and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide annual abuse training for two of four employees reviewed for abuse training (Employee E11 and E16). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse dated October 24, 2022, revealed, A yearly in-service on the Abuse Policy and on Resident Rights is mandatory for all employees. Review of Employee E11, registered nurse, personnel file revealed that the employee received abuse training on May 13, 2021. Review of Employee E16, nurse aide, personnel file revealed that the employee received abuse training on May 13, 2021. Continued review of Employee E11 and E16 personnel files revealed that there were no additional training records related to abuse training available for review at the time of the survey. Interview, on September 13, 2023, at 3:41 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Employees E11 and E16 had not received abuse training since 2021. The Nursing Home Administrator stated that he in-serviced those two employees on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,298 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $10,631 — penalty dated 2025-03-05
  • $8,469 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $7,599 — penalty dated 2023-09-14
  • $7,599 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LIFSICS, CHANNIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
MAUER, DOVIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
POLSTEIN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
STESEL, MAXIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
ZARKH, GLEBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
YEADON SNF REALTY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
HARTIGAN, KATYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
MICHEL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 3%Other / private 5%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$281per resident / day
operating cost
$8,534per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395374. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next