Edenbrook Sheboygan

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 60.6 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-07-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide basic life support to a resident in accordance with physician orders and an advance directive for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 6 sampled residents.R2 was enrolled in Hospice services and was discovered pulseless and nonbreathing on [DATE]. At the time of the incident, R2 was a full code. Staff failed to check R2's code status, provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and basic life support, or call 911. The facility's failure to provide CPR/basic life support and call 911 for a full code status resident created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A was notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 10:30 AM. The immediate jeopardy was removed and corrected on [DATE] and is being cited at past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's Code Status policy, revised [DATE], indicates the purpose of the policy is to ensure advance directives for residents are individualized by/for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement.R1's care plan upon admission on [DATE] indicated R1 was at risk for wandering/elopement. A WanderGuard (a security device that triggers an alarm if the wearer exits the facility) was placed on R1's right ankle. On 11/27/25, R1 attempted to exit the unit multiple times and was redirected by staff. The facility did not implement increased supervision for R1. On 11/27/25 at 5:15 PM, the police department notified the facility that R1 was found 0.6 miles from the facility in a hospital parking lot. Staff were unaware R1 had left the facility. An investigation indicated R1 exited through a second-floor stairwell door with a functioning alarm. Another resident's family member silenced the alarm and informed staff, who were busy with other residents. Staff did not follow the facility's procedure to conduct a head count when notified of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the appropriate care and services to prevent pressure injuries from developing and/or promote healing for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 5 sampled residents. On 12/19/24, R1 developed what was initially classified as an arterial wound on the left foot (hallux) by former Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-C, who is not wound care certified. Pressure relieving interventions for R1's feet were not implemented, and the wound was not formally assessed until 1/2/25. R1 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 1/13/25 for pneumonia and a urinary tract infection (UTI). On 1/13/25 at the hospital, R1's left foot wound was classified as an unstageable deep tissue injury. Pressure-relieving interventions (heel boots) for R1's feet were not implemented or added to R1's plan of care until 1/23/25. On 1/29/25, R1's wound was classified as a stage 4 pressure injury and the treatment order was changed. Staff did not transcribe the new treatment order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for suicidal ideation. On 6/12/24, R1 went to the Emergency Department (ED) for suicidal ideation. An ED note instructed the facility to continue 1:1 supervision for R1, however, R1 returned to the facility without adequate supervision in place and no documented 1:1 supervision. On 6/13/24 at approximately 6:30 AM, R1 ran into the dining room and sat down near Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G who left the dining room a short time later to assist other residents. R1 crawled out an open second story window without a screen, walked along a narrow ledge that was approximately 18 inches wide to a roof landing, and stood on the far ledge of the landing with R1's arms outstretched. R1 stated that R1 wanted to die. Registered Nurse (RN)-I went out the window, pulled R1 away from the ledge of the landing, walked R1 back along the same narrow ledge, and assisted R1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to prevent and/or promote healing for 2 Residents (R) (R32 and R18) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R32 had an area of moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) that was identified on 12/18/23. R32 did not have a documented treatment for the area until 1/13/24 and did not see a wound doctor until 1/24/24. The area deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury that became infected. The facility did not contact R32's physician when the wound deteriorated and R32's care plan was not updated until 1/24/24. In addition, on 2/28/24, Surveyor observed R32 sitting on a sling in R32's wheelchair. R18 was admitted to the facility with pressure injuries on the left buttock and left heel. R18's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated R18's treatments were not consistently completed. In addition, R18's skin integrity care plan contained an intervention that was not implemented. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents were provided for 4 residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, and R5) of 4 sampled residents. R1 fell on 1/10/26. R1's post-fall assessments did not start until 1/12/26. In addition, three of 8 post-fall assessments did not include an updated set of vital signs (VS). In addition, an intervention for gripper socks was not added to R1's care plan.R2 fell on [DATE], 12/2/25, and 12/10/25. Ten of 31 documented post-fall assessments did not include an updated set of VS. R3 fell twice on 11/27/25 while reaching for items. Three of 10 documented post-fall assessments did not include an updated set of VS. In addition, R3 did not have grabbers within reach on 2/4/26 in accordance with R3's care plan.R5 fell on [DATE]. Three of 10 documented post-fall assessments for R5 did not include an updated set of VS. In addition, a call for assisstance reminder sign was not posted in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the right to participate or designate others to participate in the care planning process for 3 residents (R) (R2, R3, and R5) of 5 sampled residents.Quarterly care conferences were not offered for R2, R3, and R5 in the last year.Findings include:The facility's Care Conference policy, revised 6/20/23, indicates the purpose is to provide interdisciplinary communication with the resident and/or legal representative for purposes of the development of an individualized plan of care. It also indicates the resident and/or their responsible party will receive communication in advance of the scheduled care conference .The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) shall consist of, but is not limited to: Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator, nursing representative, therapy representative, activity representative, social services representative, and dietary representative. The IDT will review some of the following in preparation for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. Food temperatures logs were incomplete for items served to residents.Beverage temperatures were greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) prior to serving residents on the third floor.Findings include:The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding: (A) .Time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained: (1) 135 degrees F or above, except that roasts cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in paragraph 3-401.11 (B) or reheated as specified in paragraph 3-403.11 (E) may be held at a temperature of 130 degrees F or above; or (2) At 41 degrees F or less.On 12/8/25 and 12/9/25, Surveyor observed the second and third floor November and December 2025 food temperature logs in the second and third floor dining rooms. The logs were undated and contained missing documentation. Surveyor noted the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not notify a Guardian of a change in condition or a need to alter treatment for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident.R1 eloped from the facility on 11/27/25. R1's Guardian was not notified of the elopement until 12/1/25.R1 fell on [DATE] at 11:20 AM and 7:28 PM. R1's Guardian was not notified of the second fall.Findings include:The facility's Elopement Risk and Prevention policy, dated 6/2/22, indicates: .Procedure for Missing Residents and/or Elopements: .3. Contact the resident's family or responsible party .The facility's Acute Care Transfer policy, dated 9/15/21, indicates: .4. Notification shall be made to the durable power of attorney/responsible party for any change in condition, including those requiring transfer to an acute care facility .On 12/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, post-traumatic stress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents was assessed following a fall with injury prior to being transferred from the floor into bed.R1 sustained a fall with injury on 12/1/25 at 11:20 AM. An X-ray was ordered and pending review. R1 sustained a second fall with reported pain on 12/1/25 at 7:28 PM. R1 was transferred from the floor into bed with the use of Hoyer slings without a physical assessment to ensure R1 was medically safe to be transferred. Findings include:The facility's Post Fall policy, dated 10/13/23, indicates: .Evaluation: Before moving the resident, ask the resident what they believe caused the fall and assess any associated symptoms. Then conduct a comprehensive evaluation .Be aware of the following warning signs: numbness or tingling in the extremities, back pain, rib pain, or an externally rotated or shortened leg. These symptoms suggest spinal cord injury, leg or pelvic fracture, or head injury. If symptoms are noted,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents was free from a chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The facility did not implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering antipsychotic medication to decrease R2's behaviors. Findings Include:The facility's Policy & Procedure Psychotropic Medication, dated 5/1/25, indicates: Purpose: To provide guidance for the psychopharmacologic drug treatment for a resident with a specific condition, including but not limited to dementia and other cognitive disorders, and/or behaviors as documented in the resident's clinical record .1. An assessment must be conducted to identify specific behaviors/symptoms, potential causative factors, and recommendations for managing identified behavior. 2. The medical record documentation must reflect the specific behaviors/symptoms and the resident's response to non-pharmacological interventions to manage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 residents (R) (R1, R2, R7, and R10) of 5 sampled residents who required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided care in a timely manner.R1 expressed concerns about long call light response times. On 7/9/25, R1 indicated R1 was incontinent and requested to be changed but was told R1 would have to wait until after lunch.R2 and R2's Guardian expressed concerns about call light response times and that R2 was not changed timely. R7 expressed concerns about long call light response times. R7 filed a grievance related to the concerns but continued to experience long call light response times.R10 expressed concerns about long call light response times which resulted in R10 having to wait for R10's needs to be met.Findings include:The facility's Activities of Daily Living policy, revised 2/25/25, indicates: Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 58 of 59 residents residing in the facility. One resident received nutrition via tube feeding. The facility's dishwasher did not reach the minimum wash temperature to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during two meal service observations. Findings include: On 4/28/25 at 8:58 AM, Surveyor interviewed Dietary Manager (DM)-J who stated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. Dishwasher Temperatures: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 4-204.113 Warewashing Machine, Data Plate Operating Specifications: A warewashing machine shall be provided with an easily accessible and readable data plate affixed to the machine by the manufacturer that indicates the machine(s) design and operating specifications including the: (A) Temperatures required for washing, rinsing, and sanitizing. The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 4-501.110 Mechanical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R47) of 2 sampled residents with a Guardian had protective placement in the facility. R47 had a legal Guardian at the time of admission on [DATE]. The facility did not have evidence of court-ordered protective placement (required when nursing home residency exceeds 90 days). Findings include: State Statute Chapter 55.03(4) indicates court-ordered protective placement is required for any resident admitted to a nursing home who has a legal Guardian and whose nursing home stay exceeds 90 days. Protective placement is reviewed annually (State Statute Chapter 55.18) to determine if placement continues to be the least restrictive and in the best interest of the resident. On 4/28/25, Surveyor reviewed R47's medical record. R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, restlessness and agitation, anxiety, and mood disorder. R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/12/25, had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when 2 residents (R) (R17 and R46) of 6 sampled residents were transferred to the hospital. R17 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility did not notify the Ombudsman of R17's hospital transfer. R46 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) on 3/19/25 and 3/28/25. The facility did not notify the Ombudsman of R46's ED transfers. Findings include The facility's Admission, Readmission, Bed Hold and Transfer/Discharge Policy, dated 10/12/21, indicates a copy of the transfer/discharge notice must be sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman .The facility must update the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of any unplanned or emergency transfers or discharges. 1. From 4/28/25 to 4/30/25, Surveyor reviewed R17's medical record. R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/24/24, R17 had a change in condition and was transferred to the hospital.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$345,576 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $142,630 — penalty dated 2025-12-17
• $161,788 — penalty dated 2025-02-26
• $14,053 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
• $27,105 — penalty dated 2024-02-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $945K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI