No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edenbrook At Hampton

1548 Sans Souci Parkway, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (570) 825-8725 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 825-8725 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0744)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
111 W End Rd Ste 101 · (570) 208-4035 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs0.8 mi
1 Great Valley Blvd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1265 Sans Souci Pkwy · (570) 822-9743 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Main Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.4%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.7%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.221.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.991.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.3%CMS range 25.8–46.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.1–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.3–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
58.3%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 83.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-10)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with the resident, resident representative, and facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to honor the resident's preferences and failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the room change, prior to a facility-initiated room change for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 17).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Room Change last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2026, indicated that the residents' preferences should be considered when making a room or roommate change. Whenever a resident is transferred from one room to another within the facility, a written notice of transfer must be provided to the resident and/or family prior to the move, according to state law. The resident should be provided with a tour of the new location, a chance to meet his/her new roommate and express any concern about the move. The notice is given in advance, except in situations outside the facility's control such as change in level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to establish mechanisms for documenting and communicating a resident's refusal of ordered laboratory monitoring to the interdisciplinary team (group of professionals from two or more disciplines who collaborate to plan and evaluate care) and failed to ensure staff followed facility policy regarding refusal of treatment for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 12).Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy, nonintractable, without status epilepticus (a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain). A review of Resident 12's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 5, 2026 revealed that Resident 12 was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality, in accordance with Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to ensure that only qualified staff performed and documented the administration of intravenous therapy via a central venous catheter and failed to ensure accurate and consistent documentation of medication administration for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 86).Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) requires the following: The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication according to physician-ordered parameters for one of 22 residents reviewed. (Resident 9)Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed on January 16, 20026, revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and applicable state and federal regulations. The policy required medications to be administered in accordance with the provider's written or verbal orders after verification of the right medication, right dose, right route, right time, and confirmation of the resident's identity, and only when no contraindications (a clinical reason a medication should not be given because it may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for one resident (Resident 7) out of 22 residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Pain Management and Assessment last reviewed on January 16, 2026, indicated the facility established a standardized method for assessing, monitoring, evaluating, managing and documenting pain in both cognitively intact and cognitively impaired residents. The policy directed staff to assess and document pain using a consistent and standardized pain assessment method appropriate to the resident's cognitive level. The policy required staff to assess and document pain including onset and duration, location, severity, alleviating, and aggravating factors, possible causes and accompanying sign and symptoms. Clinical record review revealed Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic medical condition in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency dialysis supplies for one of three residents reviewed who received hemodialysis (Resident 11).Findings include:According to clinical standards referenced by the National Kidney Foundation and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), residents receiving hemodialysis (a life-sustaining treatment used when the kidneys are no longer able to adequately remove waste and excess fluid from the blood) are at risk for serious complications, including hemorrhage (severe bleeding) and bloodstream infection. Hemodialysis requires access to the bloodstream through either a central venous catheter (a tube inserted into a large vein to allow blood to circulate through the dialysis machine) or an arteriovenous fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein, typically located in the arm, that provides reliable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: A review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety, and uncontrollable thoughts about the event). A review of Resident 3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated February 20, 2026, revealed Resident 3 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 (Brief Interview for Mental Status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the timely acquisition and availability of prescribed medications for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 29).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2026, indicated that medications and related products are received from the provider pharmacy on a timely basis. The nursing care center maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and anxiety. Review of a physician's order dated November 20, 2025, revealed an order for Levothyroxine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, select facility policy, and interviews with resident, family and staff, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to implement Transmission-Based Precautions in accordance with facility policy to reduce the potential spread of infection for one resident of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 86).Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Isolation Precautions last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2026, indicated that Transmission- Based Precautions (TBP) will be initiated when a resident is suspected or confirmed to have a communicable disease/infection that can be transmitted to another. Transmission-Based Precautions are additional infection control practices used along with Standard Precautions (routine infection prevention practices applied to all residents, such as hand hygiene and use of protective equipment when exposure to body fluids is anticipated) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, internal investigative documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Residents 27 and 31) out of a sample of 21 residents were free from abuse from a resident with a known history of physical aggression (Resident 82). Findings including: A review of the current facility policy entitled Policy and Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Prevention, last reviewed by the facility March 1, 2025, revealed it was the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation and to enhance the life of all residents through strong programming and appropriate care and treatment. There is a zero tolerance for abuse or harm of any type. Residents and staff will be monitored for protection. The facility's policy defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to promote the mental and psychosocial well-being of one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident 31). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder (a mood disorder characterized by persistent low mood and anxiety (feelings of worry and unease). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process completed at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 14, 2025, indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 15 (brief interview for mental status, a tool to assess the residents attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information, a score of 13-15 equates to being cognitively intact). Further review of the clinical record revealed a progress note dated June 7, 2025, at 6:33 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of two medication carts observed (C Hall). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed by the facility March 1,2025, indicated that multi-use medication vials/bottles that have been opened or accessed (e.g. seal broken) are to be labeled with the date they were opened to ensure proper tracking for expiration purposes. An observation of the medication cart located on C Hall unit on June 11, 2025, at 8:22 AM, in the presence of Employee 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse ) of the medication stored in the medication cart, revealed one (1) multi-dose insulin pen of Insulin Lispro (a fast acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) and two (2) multi-dose pens of Insulin Glargine (a long acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) that had been opened and available for use, but not dated when initially opened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council Meeting minutes and maintenance work orders, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all residents had access to a resident-only telephone for one of 20 residents sampled (Resident 1) and failed to provide privacy for residents when having telephone calls on three out of three clinical nursing units. Findings include: Interview with Resident 1 on January 29, 2025, at 11:40 AM revealed that the resident-only telephone, located in the B-Wing Resident Lounge, was non-operational. Resident 1 stated that for three months, the facility had informed him that the guy isn't available to fix it. He reported the issue during the January 22, 2025, Resident Council Meeting, but the facility had not addressed his concern. Observation of the B-Wing Resident Lounge on January 29, 2025, at 12:06 PM revealed a landline telephone on a countertop without a dial tone. Further observation showed the phone jack pulled out from the wall with exposed phone cable wires. Interview with Employee 2 (licensed practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, review of facility grievances, Resident Council Meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staff, providing direct services to residents, who possess the necessary competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as evidenced the facility's inability to appropriately manage and supervise the wandering and aggressive behaviors of two residents (Residents 4 and 20) out of 20 sampled. Findings include: Review of clinical record of Resident 4 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia with other behavioral disturbances (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review of a facility policy entitled Cleaning Dishes: Manual Dishwashing last reviewed by the facility on April 17, 2024, indicated that sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the attending physician failed to act upon pharmacist identified irregularities in the medication regimen of four of 20 residents sampled (Resident 12, 47, 86, and 46). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings, a mood disorder that causes radical emotional changes and mood swings, from manic, restless highs to depressive, listless lows. Most bipolar individuals experience alternating episodes of mania and depression). A review of an April 2024 Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber revealed the consultant pharmacist indicted the resident was recently admitted with an order for Quetiapine Fumarate (antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 25mg three times a day related to bipolar disorder and the medication needed to be evaluated for the effectiveness and if a GDR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, a review of facility pest service records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program throughout multiple areas of the facility. Findings include: An observation of the A hall nursing unit medication room on August 22, 2024, at approximately 9:05 AM revealed a strong mildew and sewage smell throughout the room. A flying bug was seen in the med room. An observation of the A hall nursing unit shower room on August 22, 2024, at approximately 9:15 AM revealed a large amount of sewer flies in the shower room. These flies were noted to be covering the walls of the shower room. They were noted by the tub and in both shower stalls. There was multiple dead flies noted on the floor, in the tub, or flattened on the wall. An interview with Employee 1 LPN (license practical nurse) on August 22, 2024, at approximately 9:25 AM revealed the employee stated the bugs have been an ongoing issue in the facility. She stated that they have been a problem for at least four months and have become worse over the summer. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment. Findings include: An observation on August 20, 2024, at approximately 1:30 PM revealed in Room B14 Resident 25's tube feeding pump and pole were soiled with dried tube feeding solution dried to the pump and pole. In addition there were dried spots of tube feeding solution on the floor. An observation of the A hall nursing unit medication room on August 22, 2024, at approximately 9:05 AM revealed there was dirt and debris on the floor. A strong mildew and sewage smell was noted throughout the room. A flying bug was observed flying around in this medication room. An observation of the A hall nursing unit shower room on August 22, 2024, at approximately 9:15 AM revealed a large amount of sewer flies in the shower room. These flies were noted to be covering the walls of the shower room. They were observed by the tub and in both shower stalls. There were multiple dead flies noted on the floor, in the tub, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans that include individual medication therapy for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 12). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of a physician order, initially dated April 30, 2024 revealed the resident was receiving Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 MG (anticoagulant medication-commonly known as a blood thinner, chemical substance that prevents or reduces the coagulation of blood, prolonging the clotting time) give twice a day for history of pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lung). A review of the current resident's plan of care revealed the resident's care plan failed to identify the resident's anticoagulant therapy and interventions to monitor for bleeding. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure physician ordered medication, an antibiotic, and additive were timely obtained and administered to treat a urinary tract infection for one resident (Resident 93) out of 20 sampled residents. Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: • Assessments • Clinical problems • Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient • Communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement individualized approaches for inontinence to provide maintenance care to the extent possible for one out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 25). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Urinary and Bowel Incontinence Evaluation and Management last reviewed April 17, 2024, indicated if a resident is not a candidate for a schedule, they will be placed on Incontinence Care and Comfort (checked and changed every two to three hours). A review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in cognitive abilities that can affect a person's ability to perform everyday activities) and muscle wasting. A review of the resident's bladder and bowel evaluation dated July 21, 2024, revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, has poor a potential for a toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policies and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently and accurately monitor resident weights to timely identify changes in nutritional parameters for two of 20 sampled residents (Residents 40 and 91). Findings include: The facility policy Weight Policy dated as revised June 2024, indicated that any resident with weight changes of five or more pounds will be re-weighed within 72 hours post the original weight by the assigned CNA/designee and nurse. The Dietician will review the medical record of residents with significant weight changes (greater than or equal to 5% in 1 month, greater than or equal to 7.5% in 3 months, and greater than or equal to 10% in 6 months). Interventions will be recommended, as needed. Interventions that are initiated in response to a weight change will be reflected in the care plan. Residents with significant weight loss/gain will be further reviewed by the IDCPT (interdisciplinary care plan team)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an effective individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 86). Findings include: A review of Resident 86's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (a progressive brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior) A review of Resident 29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated May 13, 2024, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of progress notes in the resident's clinical record dated from February 01, 2024 to August 24, 2024, revealed the resident exhibited behaviors of intrusive wandering, striking out, screaming, and agitation. The resident's current care plan in effect at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, and orderly environment in one of the three resident units (C Hall). Findings include: An observation on, July 2, 2024, at 8:22 AM of the wall at the C Hall nursing station revealed an area of missing floor strip molding that created a hole measuring 3 inches x 24 inches. An accummulation of rocks, dirt, metal, and other debris were observed on the floor near this hole. An ethernet outlet cover was detached from the wall, exposing the interior wiring. A small cut was observed the protective plastic exterior of a black phone wire, and an unused white phone wire was hanging from the wall. An observation on July 2, 2024, at 8:27 AM revealed dead bugs and debris inside the ceiling light fixture in the C Hall resident shower room. A thick layer of brown and gray dust was observed covering the ceiling vent and internal fan blades. An observation on July 2, 2024, at 8:32 AM in resident room C-16 revealed the floor molding was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and resident staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living consistently were provided showers as planned to maintain good personal hygiene for five of 10 residents sampled (Resident B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5). Findings include: A review of Resident B1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include diabetes, and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease that occurs when tissues that cushion the ends of bones within the joints break down), A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) of Resident B1 dated May 2, 2024, indicated that the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for showering/bathing. The resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (brief interview for mental status, a tool to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of 15 sampled was free from verbal and mental abuse (Resident A1). Findings include: A facility policy titled Abuse, dated as reviewed by the facility April 17, 2024, revealed that that it is the facility policy that each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include verbal and mental abuse. The facility policy defines verbal abuse as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to: threats of harm; saying things to frighten a resident, such as telling a resident that he will never be able to see his family again. Mental abuse was defined as the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, facility investigation reports, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to timely report the witnessed abuse of one resident out of 15 sampled (Resident A1) to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: A facility policy titled Abuse, dated as reviewed by the facility on April 17, 2024, indicated that abuse allegations are reported per federal and state law. The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency. Employees must always report any abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to the administrator. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility incident reports and the facility's abuse prohibition policy and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown source to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment for one of 15 residents sampled (Resident CR1) and failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation into the witnessed abuse perpetrated by Employee 3, and failed to protect residents from the potential for further abuse during the course of the investigation into the abuse of one resident (Resident A1) out of the 15 sampled residents. The findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy last reviewed April 17, 2024, indicated that the objective of the abuse policy is to comply with the seven-step approach to abuse and neglect detention and prevention. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select reports and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to a resident following an incident of verbal and mental abuse perpetrated by staff for one resident out of 15 sampled (Resident A1). Findings included: According to regulatory requirements under 42 CFR Part 483 Subpart B, the intent of §483.40(d) is to assure that sufficient and appropriate social services are provided to meet the resident's needs. Situations in which the facility should provide social services or obtain needed services from outside entities include, but are not limited to the following: o Expressions or indications of distress that affect the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being, resulting from depression, chronic diseases (e.g., Alzheimer's disease and other dementia related diseases, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis), difficulty with personal interaction and socialization skills, and resident to resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential resident care equipment, a sit-to-stand lift, was in safe operating condition. Findings Include: Observation of the second floor B wing residents lounge area on July 2, 2024, at 10:35 AM, in the presence of the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed one out of the three facility sit-to-stand lifts was not operating properly. Observation revealed that the adjustable leg base of the sit-to-stand lift is designed to extend open to accommodate positioning around a toilet, recliner chair, wheelchairs and obstacles, and to provide a wider base of support when transferring a resident from one location to another. Observation revealed that the left leg of the base would not move when activated by the electronic controller. Interview with the DON on July 2, 2024, during the time of the observation, revealed that the facility failed to maintain essential resident equipment in a safe operating condition. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(2.1) Management

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly act upon known risk factors, including immobility, for pressure sore development and timely implement individualized measures to prevent pressure sore development and promote healing for one of six residents sampled with pressure sores (Resident 1). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address areas of risk. ACP (The American College of Physicians is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medication as prescribed by the physician and attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for one of six residents reviewed (Resident D2). Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Pain Management Program dated October 24, 2022, indicated that the facility shall provide adequate management of pain to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Residents will be evaluated for pain upon admission, during periodic scheduled assessments, and with change in condition or status (e.g., after a fall, with change in behavior or mental status). If the resident's pain is not controlled by the current treatment regimen, the practitioner should be notified. The interdisciplinary team and the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility polity, the minutes from Resident Council Meetings and grievance logs and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate prompt action to resolve resident grievances raised at resident group meetings and keep the residents apprised of the status of the facility's decisions and efforts toward grievance resolution. Findings include: A review of the minutes from the Resident Council Meeting held during August 2023, revealed that 23 residents attended the meeting. During that meeting, the residents voiced concerns about nurse aides coming into their rooms and shutting off their call bells without meeting the needs of the residents for assistance. There was no documented evidence that the facility had addressed this concern. A review of the minutes from the Resident Council Meeting held during September 2023, revealed that 21 residents attended the meeting. During that meeting, the residents voiced the same concerns about the timeliness of assistance provided after ringing their call bells. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on three of three resident units (A hall, B hall, and C hall Nursing Units) Findings include: Observations on November 16, 2023, at 9:30 AM of the C hall Nursing Unit revealed the following: In resident Room C17 the molding was peeling off from the wall. There was a hole in the wall in the bathroom. Feces was observed on the toilet. The floor next to the toilet was wet and had a black substance around the toilet. A strong odor of urine was present. The bathroom floor was sticky. Observation in the central shower room revealed a hole in the wall outside the door that was attempted to be patched but the patch was also damaged. There were holes in the wall in the shower room along with sticky drips running down the wall with hair stuck to the wall. There were missing heat lamp lights in the shower room. The tile in the bathroom was cracked and broken. There was hair in the shower drain. [NAME] spots and a black substance were observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include the resident's preferences for showers/bathing on the comprehensive care plan of one resident out of five reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility July 14, 2023, with diagnoses to include heart disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated August 3, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, with a BIMS score (Brief Interview for Mental Status - a tool to assess cognitive function) of 15 and required extensive assist with ADLs including bathing. During an interview with Resident 1 on November 16, 2023, at approximately 9:20 a.m., the resident stated she had never been asked her preference for shower times and days to be showered. A review of Resident 1's comprehensive care plan, conducted on November 16, 2023, revealed that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-23 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of written facility initiated transfer notices and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficiently detailed written notices of facility initiated transfers to the hospital to the resident and the residents' representative for seven out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 32, 87, 91, 46, 66, 31, and 40). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 32 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on April 8, 2024, and returned to the facility on April 10, 2024. A review of the clinical record of Resident 87 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on May 8, 2024, and returned to the facility on May 14, 2024. A review of the clinical record of Resident 91 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on May 10, 2024, and returned to the facility on May 20, 2024. A review of the clinical record of Resident 46 revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on May 30, 2024, and returned to the facility on June 2, 2024. A review of the clinical record of Resident 66…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PA 6 INVESTORS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/01/2025
POLSTEIN, MORDECHAIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
STESEL, MAXIMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
HAMPTON SNF REALTY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
BYRON, ELLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
MITTAL, BASANTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
LIFSICS, CHANNIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
MAUER, DOVIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
ZARKH, GLEBIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$557K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 5%Other / private 11%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $557K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,520per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$274per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395249. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next