Evansville Manor Nursing And Rehab, LLC
470 Garfield Ave, Evansville, WI 53536 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 71 certified beds · (608) 882-5700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $182,024 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.9% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.6% | 5.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.2% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.4% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.6% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.2% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.7% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 15.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.02 | 1.66 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 2.29 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.3%CMS range 29.9–48.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.5–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.2–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 57.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (R1). R2 has a history of making inappropriate comments and inappropriately touching female residents and staff. R2 is care planned to be kept out of arms reach of female residents and to be monitored when out in common areas. On 2/27/26, R2 was left unsupervised and inappropriately touched R1.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and protect residents from sexual abuse created a reasonable likelihood for serious psychosocial harm, thus resulting in a finding of immediate jeopardy (IJ) that began on 2/27/26. Surveyor notified NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) of the immediate jeopardy on 3/12/26 at 12:00 PM. The immediacy was removed and corrected on 2/28/26. The deficient practice is being cited as past noncompliance. Evidenced by:The facility policy, Vulnerable Adult, Abuse and Neglect Prevention, dated 3/25/25, states: .It is the policy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 61 residents. Kitchen staff were not testing the parts per million (PPM) of the chemical sanitizing solution in the low temperature dishwasher during a Norovirus (a contagious virus which causes nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) outbreak.In addition, on 2/4/26 DA I (Dietary Aide) was out with GI (gastrointestinal) illness symptoms. According to CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) DA I should have been removed from work until 48 hours after DA I's last symptom/episode. DA I was allowed to return to work too early after the onset of GI symptoms and prepare food. Failure to ensure a system was in place to test ensure dishes were properly sanitized, and that staff with GI symptoms remained off of work for the appropriate amount of time created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The immediate jeopardy began on 2/6/26. Surveyor notified NHA A (Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This has the potential to affect all 61 residents.The facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice and procedures.The facility failed to maintain accurate and up to date outbreak line listings for staff and residents. Staff were allowed to return to work early after the onset of GI (Gastrointestinal Illness) symptoms.The facility failed to ensure residents experiencing GI symptoms were put into precautions timely. Observations were made of staff inappropriately handling soiled linens.Observation were made of staff failing to wear PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) as required.These failures resulted in 17 residents and 13 staff either testing positive for norovirus or exhibiting symptoms of GI illness during a Norovirus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (R56) reviewed for wandering and elopement potential. R56 has dementia and mild intellectual disabilities and has an Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care (APOAHC). R56 eloped from the facility on 8/5/24. The facility did not have adequate supervision to ensure they were aware of R56's whereabouts and did not have security measures and monitoring in place to ensure R56 could not access various locations in the building. R56 exited a door at the rear of the facility; the door alarm was disengaged allowing R56 to exit a door into a fenced-in courtyard and out through a gate without sounding an alarm and alerting staff R56 had exited the facility. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision for R56 and to ensure R56 did not have a means of exiting the facility created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 8/5/24. NHA A (Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each staff implemented proper safety interventions as directed by a resident's plan of care and did not ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. On [DATE], a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) attempted to provide care to R1 without maintaining the proper safety interventions as directed in R1's care plan. R1 rolled off the bed, falling approximately 2 feet and hitting his head. Facility staff picked up R1 off the floor and placed him in bed before the Registered Nurse (RN) could arrive on the scene to assess R1 for possible injuries. R1 was sent to the hospital where he was found to have suffered a fractured neck, resulting in his death. This created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. The facility's failure to ensure staff follow proper safety interventions to prevent accidents created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified INHA C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1). On 1/9/26, R1 voiced having increased abdomen and low back pain and was crying while voicing pain rated 10 out of 10. There is no documentation of a RN (Registered Nurse) assessment being completed. There is no documentation of nursing staff continuing to monitor R1's change in condition. R1 was sent to the emergency room on 1/10/26 and diagnosed with pneumonia, acute on chronic respiratory failure, sepsis (life-threatening condition due to the bodies response to an infection) with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (life-threatening condition characterized by severely low blood oxygen levels without an carbon dioxide level elevation, caused by lung injury or impaired oxygen exchange) and septic shock (most sever stage of sepsis occurring when an infection leads to low blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for medication errors.R2 received the wrong dose of a medication, and the facility failed to increase registered nurse (RN) assessments and update the provider timely when R2 had a change in condition.Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Change in Condition last revised on 11/13/24, states in part .Procedure: 1. The physician and Durable Power of Attorney/responsible party will be notified when there has been a change that is sudden in onset, change that is a marked difference in usual sign/symptoms and/or the signs/symptoms are unrelieved by measures already prescribed: 2. Specific information that requires prompt notification include, but is not limited to: a. Significant change or instability of vital signs; .g. Change in level of consciousness; .k. A medication error or adverse reaction to medication; l. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 2 of 3 residents (R6 and R15) reviewed for falls and 4 of 5 residents (R12, R18, R19, and R20) reviewed for Hoyer transfers. R6 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R15, R12, R18, R19, and R20 are being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). R6 was left in her bed with the bed in the high position. R6 fell out of bed landing face down resulting in a nasal fracture and lacerations to her forehead and lip that required sutures. R12, R18, R19, and R20 were being transferred with a Hoyer lift and only one staff present, resulting in R12 sustaining a skin tear to his toe. R15's care planned interventions were not being followed, resulting in a possible hand fracture. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Fall Reduction Policy dated 8/1/15 with last revision date of 10/13/23, states in part: Purpose: To provide an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents admitted without a pressure injury (PI) did not develop pressure injuries unless clinically unavoidable and did not ensure residents are provided cares and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of PI for 1 of 5 residents (R14) reviewed for pressure injuries. R14 developed a stage 3 PI behind his left ear. The facility failed to implement pressure relieving interventions prior to R14 developing a PI. Evidenced by: The AMDA (American Medical Directors Association) clinical practice guideline entitled, 'Pressure Ulcers and Other Wounds,' dated 2017, states in part: .A pressure ulcer (Injury) is localized damage to the skin or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The ulcer may present as intact skin or as an open ulcer and may be painful. The ulcer occurs as a result of intense or prolonged pressure or pressure in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical needs for 1 of 3 (R3) sampled residents. R3 had a diagnosis of CHF (Congestive Heart Failure). The facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments for R3 including daily weights and monitoring edema, resulting in repeated hospitalizations. Evidenced by: According to an article from The National Library of Medicine titled Congestive Heart Failure (Nursing) last updated 11/5/23, .Monitoring: Patients with HF require frequent monitoring of vital signs, including oxygen saturation .Frequent assessment and monitoring for symptoms is also indicated. All patients with HF require daily weight monitoring . Congestive Heart Failure (Nursing) - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov) According to the article by Harvard Medical School, Fluid buildup indicates worsening heart failure .The buildup of excess fluid in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse were properly disposed of in outside garbage storage receptacles. This practice has the potential to affect all 61 residents. Surveyor observed the facility's outside garbage receptacle to be full to the top and the lid wide open. Evidenced by:On 2/22/26 at approximately 9:30 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with LC AA (Lead Cook), Surveyor observed the outside garbage storage receptables. One of the receptacles had the cover wide open and there were garbage bags up to and over the top of the sides. Surveyor asked LC AA about the lid. LC AA stated, that shouldn't be open, it could cause problems.On 2/24/26 at 2:53 PM, Surveyor interviewed DM BB (Dietary Manager) who stated the lid should be closed for pest control.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
:Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance committee failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct deficient practices related to food safety requirements and infection control. This has the potential to affect all 61 residents.The facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice and proper sanitation of dishware during a Gastrointestinal illness outbreak. Evidenced by: The facility's Quality Assurance/Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan policy, dated 9/4/24, states, in part: Purpose: The QAPI Program is to utilize an on-going, data driven, pro-active approach to advance to the quality of life and quality of care for all residents at the facility. QAPI principles will drive our facilities decision making to promote excellence in all resident and staff related areas. All facility staff, families, and residents will be encouraged to be involved in identifying opportunities for improvement. Feedback, Data Systems, and Monitoring: The facility will monitor multiple data sources and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for daily living for 3 of 61 Residents (R3, R21, and R34). R3's room was not clean.R21's room was not clean.R34's room was not clean.R21 and R34 share a bathroom. The shared bathroom was not clean.This is evidenced by:The facility's Cleaning Checklist for Elderly Home, undated, includes: Introduction Maintaining a clean and sanitary environment is essential in elderly care facilities to ensure the health and well-being of residents, staff, and visitors. This checklist provides guidance for cleaning areas where residents are present. Resident Rooms (Occupied) *Dust surfaces gently, avoiding disturbance to residents *Disinfect frequently touched surfaces: bed rails, tables, door handles, light switches *Sweep and mop floors, taking care around personal belongings *Clean bathroom area (if en-suite): toilet, sink, mirrors, grab bars.The facility utilizes a Daily Cleaning Checklist. There is a place for the housekeeper's signature and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 61Number of residents cited: 5Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident (R) for 5 of 61 residents reviewed (R1, R3, R19, R21, R34). R3 stated she has to wait up to 45 minutes for her call light to be answered and staff leave her room without meeting her needs. R21 states she does not get the care she is supposed to get per her care plan because the staff do not have enough time to complete the task because of lack of staffing. R21 states staff will turn off her call light and leave the room without meeting her needs. R34 did not get repositioned per her care plan because the CNAs stated they were too busy and do not have enough staff. Observation of long call light wait times. R1 does not receive care per her care plan. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Sufficient Staffing, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 2Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for grievances (R2 and R40). R2 voiced a grievance to the facility. Staff did not write their concerns up as a grievance, complete an investigation, or follow-up with the complainant. R40's APOA (Activated Power of Attorney) voiced a grievance to the facility. Staff did not write their concerns up as a grievance, complete an investigation, or follow-up with the complainant. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Grievance/Concerns last revised on 10/29/24 states in part .Procedure: 1. Facility will make prompt efforts to resolve all grievances.4. Residents have the right to file grievances orally or in writing; and they have the right to file grievances anonymously. 5. At any time, comments, suggestions, or complaints by the residents and/or their representatives are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure to develop and implement written policies and procedures that: S483.12(b)(1) Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 3 of 8 staff reviewed for background checks. RN LL (Registered Nurse) did not have a background check completed every 4 years.LPN MM (Licensed Practical Nurse) did not have a background check completed every 4 years.CNA X (Certified Nursing Assistant) did not have a universal background check completed despite indicating that she lived out of state last year. This is evidenced by:The facility policy, Policy and Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention, dated 11/17/17 with last revision date of 2/25/25, states, in part: Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Resident Protection Program Policy and Procedure: The seven elements of the prevention and investigation include: Screening. 1. Screening and Training of New Employees and Volunteers: a. Employees: i. Screen potential employees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 3 sampled Residents (R40).R40's APOA (Activated Power of Attorney) reported that R40 was not being changed into their pajamas at night,Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living with a revision date of 2/25/25 states in part Policy: Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that such diminution was unavoidable.R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, chronic pain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and other symptoms and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 2Number of residents cited: 2Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries (PI) for 2 of 2 Residents (R8 and R34) reviewed for pressure injuries. R34 has a PI and was not repositioned per her care plan. R8 has a stage 4 pressure injury and was observed lying in bed without prevlon boots on. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Pressure Injury Prevention and Wound Care Management, dated 8/25/25, includes: The purpose of the policy is to provide healthcare staff with the standards of care, and processes to be followed for all residents: *To identify factors that places the residents at risk for the development of pressure injuries and to implement appropriate interventions to prevent the development of clinically avoidable wounds. *To promote a systemic approach and monitoring process for the care of residents with existing wounds and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents with limited range of motion, received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion/mobility and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion/mobility for 1 of 2 residents (R21) reviewed for range of motion (ROM).R21 did not receive active assisted range of motion to her bilateral lower extremities (BLE) per R21's provider orders and comprehensive care plan.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 2/25/25, includes: Policy: Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. A resident will be given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 residents (R34) reviewed for medications.R34 had a medication error due to not receiving her medications timely. This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Administering Medications, dated 1/22/24, includes: Purpose: To ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and state/federal regulations. 4. Medications shall be administered per provider's (MD (Medical Doctor), NP (Nurse Practitioner), PA (Physician Assistant)) written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are identified, and the medication is labeled according to accepted standards. 7. Medications should be administered within one (1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (R1). R1 takes a medication used for anxiety PRN (as needed). The facility failed to recognize that all PRN psychotropic medications or medications used off-label as psychotropic medications should be limited to 14 days unless deemed appropriate by the provider. Evidenced by:The facility policy, Psychotropic Medication, dated 8/1/15 with a last revision date of 5/1/25, states, in part: . Procedure: . 11. PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: bipolar disorder (mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a CNA (certified nursing assistant) for 1 of 3 Residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. R1 and CNA C (certified nursing assistant) had a verbal altercation. The facility did not implement appropriate actions to protect R1. CNA C continued to provide direct care to residents. The facility did not educate all staff on abuse during the abuse investigation. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Policy & Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention, dated 3/25/25, states, in part: . Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. The guidelines include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Facility became aware of an abuse allegation on 9/26/25 at 10:15 PM and did not report to the State Agency until 9/27/25 at 12:12 PM. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Policy & Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention, dated 3/25/25, states, in part: . Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse and timely and thorough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated, and that steps were taken to prevent further abuse for 1 or 3 residents reviewed (R1). On 9/27/25, the facility became aware of an abuse allegation regarding R1. The facility failed to provide evidence to prevent further abuse to R1 and other residents. The facility allowed the staff member identified in the abuse allegation to continue working with residents. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Policy & Procedure Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention, dated 3/25/25, states, in part: . Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (R5) reviewed for medications.R5 has medications that should not be crushed prior to administration. R5 received those medications crushed. R5 received an enteric coated medication when the medication should have been in a chewable form. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Medication Error, dated 5/14/21, includes: All medication errors and drug reactions will be reported promptly to the licensed nurse, the attending physician, and will be documented according to established procedures. Medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of medications or biological that is not in accordance with the prescriber's orders, manufacturer specifications regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological and/or accepted professional standards for medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents (R) receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice or the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed. R3 voiced concern that her bottom was getting sore from sitting on the Hoyer sling. The Registered Nurse (RN) did not complete an assessment and delayed in notifying the provider of R3's potential skin breakdown. R3 has a diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) that was not being adequately monitored. The facility did not follow physician's orders for bi-weekly weights and did not notify the provider when there were weight fluctuations. Findings include: Example 1: Facility policy entitled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Wound Care Management, dated 8/26/18 with last revision date of 3/4/24, states, in part: Purpose: The purpose of the policy is to provide healthcare staff with the standards of care, and processes to be followed for all residents .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received food that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 test tray on the 100 hallway affecting 9 out of 10 residents and 1 of 4 residents (R16) interviewed on food. R16 voiced concerns regarding cold food. Surveyor received a test tray, and the food was cool and not palatable. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Food Temperature Record, dated 6/28/22, states, in part: .Policy: To ensure that foods and beverages are held and served at temperatures which comply with State and Federal Regulations. F804: Each resident receives, and the facility provides food that is palatable and at the proper temperature . Procedure: . 2. TCF (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food) foods such as meat, poultry, fish and eggs should be cooked to the minimum internal temperature specified below: Pork, Beef, or Veal (Steaks or Chops)- 145* F for 15 seconds (Roasts)- 145* F for 4 minutes Poultry- 165* F for 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the administrator and other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 9 residents (R8 and R9) reviewed for abuse. A friend of MR O (Medical Records) observed DA P (Dietary Aide) post a photo of R8 and R9 on her personal Snapchat account with text indicating Hanging with my homies. The friend of MR O forwarded the photo to MR O, who is employed at the facility. MR O did not immediately report this allegation of abuse to the facility. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention Policy and Procedure, revised 3/25/25, documents in part: .It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse .Additionally, residents and staff will be protected from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the administrator and other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 9 residents (R8 and R9) reviewed for abuse. A friend of MR O (Medical Records) observed DA P (Dietary Aide) post a photo of R8 and R9 on her personal Snapchat account with text indicating Hanging with my homies. The friend of MR O forwarded the photo to MR O, who is employed at the facility. The facility did not interview other residents to determine the scope of the concern or educate staff regarding timely reporting. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention Policy and Procedure, revised 3/25/25, documents in part: .It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate monitoring for medications for 1 of 4 Residents (R3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R3 was receiving Metoprolol (blood pressure medication) without evidence of R3's blood pressure being monitored per physician orders. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Administering Medications, dated 1/22/24, states, in part: . Purpose: To ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and state/federal regulations. Procedure: . 4. Medications shall be administered per provider's (Medical Doctor, Nurse Practitioner. Physician Assistant) written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time . R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4/30/25. R3 has diagnoses that include hypertension (high blood pressure, a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored or labeled in accordance with professional standards. This has the potential to affect the census of 59 residents. Multiple food and beverage items for resident consumption stored in the facility's kitchen refrigerator and dry storage room were not labeled with open or expiration dates and/or were beyond the labeled discard date. Dish washing was completed without testing the dishwasher temperature and concentration of the sanitizer. Sanitizer buckets were utilized without testing for temperature and concentration of sanitizer. Findings include: Facility policy entitled Sanitation and Cleaning Schedule, dated revised on 8/15/23, states, in part: Procedure .5. Sink Sanitizer Log must be completed per policy for both three and four compartment manual ware washing sink and buckets or spray bottles filled with quat sanitizer and reviewed daily.Storage (Dry) .5. All food items must be dated upon receiving and dated and sealed when opened.Storage (Refrigerated) . 3. All refrigerated and prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 5 R7's shower day is Friday. R7 did not receive a shower three times from August 1, 2024, through September 26, 2024. R7 did not have showers on 8/9/24, 8/30/24, and 9/13/24. R7's shower documentation for the dates of missed showers, documents: 8, 8 NA which indicates 8- Activity itself did not occur or family and/or non-facility staff provided care 100% of the time for that activity, Not Applicable. Of note, these dates were not noted to be resident refusals. Example 6 R27's shower day is Thursday. R27 did not receive a shower in August at all and had not received a shower in September as of September 26, 2024. R27 did not have showers on 8/1/24, 8/8/24, 8/15/24, 8/22/24, 8/29/24, 9/5/24, 9/12/24, and 9/19/24. R27's shower documentation for the dates of missed showers, documents: 8, 8 NA which indicates 8- Activity itself did not occur or family and/or non-facility staff provided care 100% of the time for that activity, Not Applicable. Of note, these dates were not noted to be resident refusals. Example…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure drugs and biological's are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 Medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The 300 Hall medication cart had an undated open insulin pen for R26, R512, and R33. The 200 Hall medication cart had an undated open insulin pen for R40. RN R (Registered Nurse) repackaged Aspirin 81 milligrams for her residents at the beginning of her shift and stored them in a medication cup in the top drawer of the medication cart. As evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Medication Storage, dated 2/12/24 states in part, Purpose: To ensure that medications and biologicals [sic] are stored in a safe, secure storage and safe handling. Procedure: General Guidelines . 3. No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications should be available for use in the facility. All such medications are destroyed per policy. 4. Expired medications are to be removed from areas medication carts prior to or at the time of expiration . Multi-Dose vials: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature, for 4 of 4 hallways and one of one dining room This has the potential to affect the total census of 59 residents (4 of 4 hallways, 1 of 1 dining room, and 1 of 1 test tray). Residents voiced concerns with receiving hot foods cold. Test tray was observed to have hot foods served cold and beverages served warm. R2 indicated that hot food is not served hot. R38 and R31 indicated hot food is served cold and cold foods are served warm often. R38 and R31 indicated this has been discussed previously at monthly Resident Council meetings. R17 & R9 voiced concerns with receiving cold food. Findings include: Facility policy entitled Food Temperature Record, dated 6/28/22, states, in part: Policy: To ensure that foods and beverages are held and served at temperatures which comply with State and Federal Regulations. Example 1 On 9/24/24 at 8:19 AM, Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (R32) of 28 residents reviewed. Surveyor observed R32's room to smell like urine, a brown substance on floor, garbage can full of garbage, and white debris under R32's bed and on floor on 9/23/24 and 9/24/24. Evidence by The facility policy, Cleaning Resident Room, revision date 5/8/24, states, in part; .To ensure appropriate cleaning procedures using an EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)- approved cleaning agent for disinfection of room surfaces and equipment .10. Thoroughly mop entire floor with approved cleaning solution (under furniture, behind doors, along baseboards. Mop your way out the door and place wet floor sign in doorway. 11. Discard all disposable items . On 9/23/24 at 10:20 AM, Surveyor observed resident bedroom to smell like urine, a brown substance on floor, garbage can full of garbage, and white debris under resident bed and on floor. On 9/24/24 at 3:17 PM, Surveyor observed R32's room to still have brown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from misappropriation for 1 of 8 abuse investigations reviewed (R24). On 9/22/24, R24 filled out a grievance indicating he gave a Norro foot massager to RN L (Registered Nurse) to borrow and did not see it again. R24 further documents, he asked RN L for it back on 9/21/24, and was ignored. R24 threatened to call the police on RN L before RN L provided R24 with his belonging. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure, Abuse and Neglect Prevention, revised, 10/4/23, documents in part, the following: Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. All residents are susceptible to maltreatment and exploitation due to their need for nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility did not ensure alleged violations involving misappropriation were reported to the State Agency immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, for 1 of 8 (R24) allegations reviewed. On 9/22/24 R24 filled out a grievance/allegation indicating he gave a Norro foot massager to RN L (Registered Nurse) to borrow and did not see it again. R24's grievance (an allegation of misappropriation) was forwarded to BOM M (Business Officer Manager), who is the Manger on Duty. BOM M did not read the allegation in its entirety nor did she report this allegation of abuse to DON B (Director of Nursing) or NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator). BOM M left the grievance (allegation of abuse) for SW C (Social Worker) to receive the following day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation for 1 of 8 abuse allegations (R24). On 9/22/24 R24 filled out a grievance indicating he gave a Norro foot massager to RN L (Registered Nurse) to borrow and did not see it again. DON B (Director of Nursing) and NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) have not investigated this allegation of misappropriation. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure, Abuse and Neglect Prevention, revised, 10/4/23, documents in part, the following: Purpose: To provide residents a safe environment that is free from harm. Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation. The facility will follow the federal guidelines dedicated to the prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. The guidelines include compliance with the seven (7) federal components of prevention and investigation. All residents are susceptible to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 29 sampled residents (R32) to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs that are identified. R32's Comprehensive Care Plan does not reflect person-centered interventions to best support R32. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Care Plan- Baseline and Comprehensive, dated 6/20/23, states, in part; .Purpose: To ensure that each resident receives care individualized to him or herself and that goals and approaches for care are communicated to all parties including caregivers, the resident, and the resident's representative .Policy: The Interdisciplinary Team will develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident based on their medical condition, medical history, assessments from different members of the interdisciplinary team, lifestyle, and current resident goals R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change of condition (R56). R56 has congestive heart failure and did not have his weight monitored and reported to the physician in accordance with orders and standards of practice. Findings include The AHA (American Heart Association) states that daily weights is one of the most important symptoms to track for those with heart failure. The AHA notes, Many people are first alerted to worsening heart failure when they notice a weight gain of more than two or three pounds in a 24-hour period or more than five pounds in a week. This weight gain may be due to retaining fluids since the heart is not functioning properly. It's a good idea to track your weight and check in with your health care professional if you notice sudden changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 1 resident (R39) reviewed for hydration. R39 had an order for a fluid restriction that was not monitored by staff, as well as a significant weight gain that was not reported to R39's medical provider. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Hydration revised on 2/4/24 states in part .3. Fluid breakdown for residents on fluid restrictions will be placed on the MAR (Medication Administration Record), on the POC (Point of Care) task list, and in the resident care plan .14. Intake and Output monitoring will be assessed by licensed nursing staff at least weekly, and physicians will be contacted regarding continuous monitoring as needed . The facility's policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff did not adequately assess and treat pain and provide necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for pain (R45). The facility failed to provide R45 with his ordered PRN pain medication when reporting 8 out of 10 pain, in consecutive shift assessments. The facility also failed to reassess the resident's pain after non-pharmacologic interventions had been administered. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Pain Management and Assessment, dated 4/27/22 states, in part: . Procedure: 1. Nursing staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain .7. Non-pharmacological interventions (i.e. repositioning resident, turning lights off, warm cloth, etc.) will be attempted prior to the use of PRN (as needed) analgesics whenever appropriate. Use of interventions and effectiveness will be documented. 8. Evaluation of the effectiveness of analgesic pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 8 errors out of 27 opportunities that affected 1 of 1 sampled residents (R43) and 2 of 9 supplemental residents (R513 & R15) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 29.63%. The facility's medication error rate was 29.63% with medication errors observed for R513, R43, and R15. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, Administering Medications, dated 8/1/2015, states in part, as follows: Purpose: To ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and state/federal regulations. Medications shall be administered per provider's (MD, NP, PA) written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are identified, and the medication is labeled according to accepted standards. Medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 total sampled residents (R513). Surveyor observed R513's medication pass on 9/23/24. RN R (Registered Nurse) stated, R513's Entresto (combination medication to treat heart failure) is not available. R513's order for Entresto for high blood pressure is dated 8/30/24. R513 has not received Entresto since it was ordered. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, Administering Medications, dated 8/1/2015, states in part, as follows: Purpose: To ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and state/federal regulations. Medications shall be administered per provider's (MD, NP, PA) written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are identified, and the medication is labeled according to accepted standards. Medications should be administered within one (1) hour of the prescribed times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that an allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment was reported immediately, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1). Findings include The facility's abuse policy states the following: *All residents are susceptible to male treatment and exploitation due to their need for nursing home care. *Serious bodily injury means an injury involving extreme physical pain; involving substantial risk of death; Involving protected loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation; Or an injury resulting from criminal sexual abuse . *Accident means a sudden, unforeseen, and unexpected occurrence or event which: (a) is not likely to occur and which could not have been prevented by exercise of due care; and (b) if occurring while a vulnerable adult is receiving services from a facility, happens when the facility and the employee or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident and did not take action to prevent further potential abuse for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1). Incident occurred with a CNA where R1 fell out of bed and sustained an injury. This incident was not investigated and the results of the investigation were not reported. Findings include The facility's abuse policy states the following: *Upon receiving a complaint of alleged maltreatment the administrator must be notified immediately and they, the director of nursing, or assigned designee, will coordinate an investigation, which will include completion of witness statements. All parties involved including two of the following-staff, residents or visitors, who were potentially involved, or observed the alleged incident are to be interviewed by the DON, director of social services or their designees. R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include. Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, aphasia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs; CNA N and CNA O) of 5 CNA's employed by the facility received 12 hours per year of in-service training. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents in the facility. CNA N was hired on 9/13/22 and did not have 12 hours of in-service training during the most recent anniversary of hire year. CNA O was hired on 12/22/22 and did not have 12 hours of in-service training during the most recent anniversary of hire year. Evidenced by: The Facility Assessment with a date completed/updated of 1/23/24, indicates, in part: .Yearly education requirements are managed by Relias. Annual education includes training in dementia, depression, PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), schizophrenia, adjustment disorder and anxiety. This training will include basic information in de-escalation techniques, appropriate verbal and non-verbal communication and safety awareness including but not limited to the listed diagnosis .Education/Inservices .Resident's rights and facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 5 R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], has diagnoses that include hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body due to brain or spinal cord damage), R25 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 00 indicating a severe cognitive impairment. R25's Care Plan, revised on 3/16/23, with a target date of 6/22/23, states: Weigh at the same time of day and record: Monthly. Report significant changes to MD (Doctor). On 1/4/23, at 5:18 PM, a progress note was entered into R25's eMAR by Diet. P (Dietician) that states in part: R25 has experienced a significant weight loss of 9.5 lbs./5.8% in less than 90 days. Current weight is 153.5 lbs.Will continue current plan and monitor for further weight loss. On 2/27/23, at 12:27 PM, a progress note was entered into R25's eMAR by Diet. P that states in part: .Will continue to monitor weights . On 2/27/23, an order for R25 was given for the facility to provide weekly weights r/t (related to) tube feeding one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents (R) receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 5 of 5 Residents reviewed for Pressure Injuries out of a total sample of 22 Residents (R361, R43, R23, R28, & R25). R361 was admitted to the facility with a pressure injury to her bottom, that was not assessed or measured until several days after her admission. R43 developed a pressure injury (PI) to left heel on 6/13/23 there was no Registered Nurse (RN) assessment, Braden tool was not re-done, and Provider (Physician or Nurse Practitioner) was not updated. The facility did not follow R23's physician orders for wound care treatment. The facility did not follow R28's physician orders for wound care treatment. Surveyor observed the settings for R25's air mattress outside the range of care planned settings. This is evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Pressure Injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 19 residents (R35). R35's bed linens were not replaced, nor was her bed made after having been incontinent. Findings include: On 6/26/23 at 10:33 AM, Surveyor observed R35 sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R35 stated to Surveyor that she had just been assisted out of bed just before 10:30 AM. R35 stated that staff are slow to get beds changed. R35 stated that she understands and that she was recently a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) at a nearby facility before she had a stroke. Surveyor noted R35's bed was not made. At 3:20 PM, Surveyor again observed R35 sitting in her room in her wheelchair. Her bed was not made; covers untucked and rolled all the way to the foot of the bed with a bed pad visible on top of the sheets. R35 stated to Surveyor that she had not been back in bed since 10:00 AM. R35 stated that she had been incontinent twice between 6:30 AM and when she was first assisted out of bed and into the bathroom at 10:00 AM and had told this to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder were followed through with for 1 of 5 residents (R26) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R26 did not have a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) II completed. This is evidenced by: R26 admitted to the facility in 2019 with the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder- recurrent severe without psychotic features, chronic PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), and personality disorder. At the time of admission, the facility completed a PASRR I with a 30-day exemption (meaning they thought he would be discharged back into the community within 30 days). The facility's Policy and Procedure entitled admission Criteria dated 2/25/22, documents in part: .8. Nursing and medical needs of individuals with mental disorders or intellectual disabilities will be determined by coordination with the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review program (PASARR) to the extent practicable. 8. Potential residents with mental disorders or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 19 sampled residents (R22 and R25) that were reviewed for ADLs. R22 voiced of not receiving a shower for 22 days. R25 nails were observed to be dirty and extending past fingertips. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 3/15/21, states in part: . 2. The facility will provide care and services for the following activities of daily living: Hygiene- bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care . Elimination- toileting . 4. Resident's abilities to perform ADLs will be monitored for evidence of any decline and appropriate interventions put in place as applicable . 7. If a resident refuses care, this shall be reported to the nurse and the resident reapproached. Documentation of refusal shall be completed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 out of 18 residents (R22 & R32). R22 did not receive his ordered Carbidopa-Levodopa in the correct time parameters of the medication order 42 times out of 360 opportunities. R32 did not receive her ordered Lantus in the correct time parameters as ordered 9 times out of 59 opportunities. R32 did not receive her ordered Novolog Insulin in the correct time parameters as ordered 24 times out of 177 opportunities. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Administering Medications, dated 8/15/22, states, in part: . Purpose: To ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and state/federal regulations. Procedure: . 3. Medications shall be administered in physician's written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time, and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that before offering the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations, each resident or the resident's representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization, and the resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations; and that the resident either received the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations or did not receive the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations due to medical contraindications or refusal. This affected 2 of 5 residents (R26 and R34) reviewed for immunizations. R26 did not have a consent or declination in his medical record for the influenza vaccine for 2022. R34 consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccine and did not get it. This is evidenced by: The facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Seasonal Influenza Vaccine dated 6/28/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that before offering COVID-19 vaccine, each resident or the resident representative receives education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, and the resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: that the resident or resident representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine; and if the resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical contraindications or refusal. This affected 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (R52). R52 was not offered the COVID-19 vaccine(s). This is evidenced by: The facilities Policy and Procedure entitled COVID-19 Vaccine dated 5/3/23 documents in part: .2. COVID-19 vaccine will be offered, and education provided to all residents of the facility unless medically contraindicated. a. The resident's medical record will include documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: i. That the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$182,024 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $60,528 — penalty dated 2025-09-17
- $69,720 — penalty dated 2025-05-15
- $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
- $16,068 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-02-05
- $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-02-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-15 for 20 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EDEN SENIOR CARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFSICS, CHANNIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9% | since 10/01/2018 |
| POLSTEIN, MORDECHAI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 19% | since 10/01/2018 |
| STESEL, MAXIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 53% | since 10/01/2018 |
| PLYMALE, MONICA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| RICE, PAMELA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| MAUER, DOVIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $844K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.