No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

WINDSOR

Ownership rollup across 22 nursing homes in 1 state: California. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.4 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 0.7 stars below the ~3.2 average of its state. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It has been broadly flat, moving +0.00 stars across the same 22 homes rated throughout between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

22
Homes in this chain
2,725
Certified beds124 per home on average
91%
Occupied2,360 residents a day across 2,597 beds · 21 of 22 homes
+0.00
Star changeacross the 22 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
1
State covered
2.4
Average CMS rating~3.2 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.0 of 522 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing3.0 of 522 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures4.1 of 521 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

2 with immediate-jeopardy citations6 with an abuse flag11 with federal fines
Ownership

1 of this chain’s 22 home is tied to private-equity ownership in CMS ownership records. Private-equity and REIT operators are the focus of most research into how money is moved out of nursing homes — often through the related-party payments shown below. CMS under-reports these ties, so read this as a floor.

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$9.9M
Related-party expensesummed across 22 homes · FY2023 cost reports
3%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 22 homes reporting both figures
-7.5%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 22 homes with a cost report
$485K
Total federal fines11 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 74%Medicare 8%Other / private 18%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the 21 of 22 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Delta Oaks Post AcuteStockton, CA 1 of 5Abuse flag
Hampton Post AcuteStockton, CA 1 of 5Abuse flag $21,548 fined
North Long Beach Post AcuteLong Beach, CA 1 of 5$69,421 fined
Oak Grove Post AcuteStockton, CA 1 of 5Abuse flag $40,283 fined PE-backed
River City Post AcuteCarmichael, CA 1 of 5Abuse flag
Terrace Post AcuteVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5$94,094 fined
Windsor Gardens Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5$37,882 fined
Cheviot Hills Post AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $51,613 fined
Park View Nursing And SubacuteReseda, CA 2 of 5
Solano Post AcuteVallejo, CA 2 of 5$73,177 fined
South Coast Post AcuteSanta Ana, CA 2 of 5Abuse flag
Windsor Care Center Of SacramentoSacramento, CA 2 of 5
Alta Gardens Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 3 of 5$8,278 fined
Citrus Grove Post AcuteRiverside, CA 3 of 5
Country Drive Post AcuteFremont, CA 3 of 5
Elk Grove Post AcuteElk Grove, CA 3 of 5Abuse flag $8,824 fined
National City Post AcuteNational City, CA 3 of 5$15,652 fined
Coastal Post AcuteSalinas, CA 4 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $63,850 fined
Hayward Post AcuteHayward, CA 4 of 5
Monterey Post AcuteMonterey, CA 4 of 5
Rosewood Post AcutePleasant Hill, CA 4 of 5
Windsor The Ridge Rehabilitation CenterSalinas, CA 5 of 5
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.