No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hayward Post Acute

25919 Gading Road, Hayward, CA 94544 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (510) 782-8424 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (510) 782-8424 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
1644 Cheney Lane
Pharmacy
Oportun0.3 mi
199 Harder Rd · (510) 256-6111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
426 W Harder Rd · (510) 723-3336 · Call to confirm hours
Park
26119 Evergreen St · (510) 881-6700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.1%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.2%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.352.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.711.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.65U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.8%CMS range 37.9–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.7–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 2.6–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 88.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-11)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident 1 when their nasogastric tube (NGT is a soft tube inserted through the nose, throat and into the stomach to provide nutrition, hydration, and medications when a person can't eat by mouth ) dislodged three times within a 17-day period. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for aspiration, interruption of nutrition and hydration, missing medication doses, and repeated exposures to X-rays.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) printed on 5/13/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke (brain suddenly stops getting enough blood) and dysphagia (have trouble swallowing).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool to direct residents' care) dated 12/30/25 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system to identify memory, orientation, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2) received the necessary care and services according to their clinical needs related to diabetes (a chronic disease in which the body has elevated blood sugar, also call blood glucose) monitoring, ileostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdominal wall, bring the end of the small intestines to the surface to allow waste to exit the body directly into external pouch call ileostomy bag, bypassing the colon and rectum.) care, medication management, and indwelling urinary catheter (also called Foley catheter, a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder and left in place to continuously drain urine) care when1. Resident 2 was receiving insulin (a medication that lowers blood glucose), yet the facility did not document their blood glucose levels.2. Resident 2 received laxative (medication or substance to lose stools and increase bowel movements) while having large, watery stools,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and implement appropriate interventions for Resident 1 when Resident 1's nasogastric tube (NGT is a soft tube inserted through the nose, throat and into the stomach to provide nutrition, hydration, and medications when a person can't eat by mouth) dislodged three times within a 17-day period. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for aspiration, interruption of nutrition and hydration, missing medication doses, and repeated exposures to X-rays.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) printed on 5/13/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke (brain suddenly stops getting enough blood) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool to direct residents' care) dated 12/30/26 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system to identify memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on Resident 1's grievance.This failure led to Resident 1 feeling angry and sad. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 9/10/25, it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder.During an interview on 9/10/25 at 11:50 a.m., with Resident 1, the resident stated Resident 2 resided in the room across Resident 1's room and he could hear him yelling and screaming at the staff. Also stated Resident 2 had a behavior of pounding on and off on overbed table. Further stated that Resident 2's behavior made him angry and sad. Stated he had brought his concern to the staff on multiple occasions, but nothing was done about it.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 6/25/25, it indicated he had a brief interview for mental status or BIMS of 15 (score of 15 indicates a cognitively intact status, meaning the resident shows no significant or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for safety when: 1. The kitchen refrigerator had packages of uncooked meat stored directly above fruit.2. Diet Aide (DA) 1 had uncovered facial hair while they prepared resident food. These failures had the potential for contamination of food resulting in food borne illness for the 88 residents who lived at the facility.During an observation on 12/8/25 at 9:30 a.m., in the kitchen, the refrigerator had uncooked turkey and beef stored directly over cantaloupes. During an observation on 12/8/25 at 12:53 p.m., in the kitchen, DA 1 had uncovered facial hair while DA 1 prepared resident sandwiches. During an interview on 12/11/25 at 2:21 p.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated uncooked meat should not have been stored over fruit and it was important to avoid cross contamination. RD stated DA 1 should have covered their facial hair when they prepared resident food and it was important to avoid food contamination. According to the 2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow one out of 22 Residents (Resident 11) to exercise their right to self-determination when they were not provided nutrition in accordance with their preferences. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 11 feeling upset and disrespected. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, printed 12/9/25, the record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with a diagnosis of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. During a review of Resident 11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.), dated 2/3/25, the record indicated Resident 11's BIMS score was 14. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/8/25, at 12:43 p.m., with Resident 11, Resident 11's lunch tray was observed with mixed vegetables that included cauliflower. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop new interventions to address the prevention of displacement and clogging of one of one sampled resident's (Resident 1) nasogastric tube (NGT, a tube that is inserted through the nose going down into the stomach) when Resident 1's NGT was displaced or clogged five times between January to July 2024. This deficient practice resulted in five transfers to the acute care hospital emergency department for NGT reinsertion for Resident 1. This also had the potential of making Resident 1 feel discomfort and develop infections. Findings: Review of the admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease (an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of your body). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 7/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a safe and sanitary manner when: 1. Corn was rinsed in the handwashing sink, during food preparation, 2. Meat was thawed in still water, 3. There was no air gap (a gap of air between the floor and a drainpipe to prevent backflow of sewage into the equipment) for the 3-part compartment sink, 4. Hand Hygiene protocol was not followed during food preparation, and 5. Hand Hygiene protocol was not followed during tray line. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illnesses for 81 residents who received food from the kitchen for a facility census of 88. Findings: 1. During an observation in the kitchen, on 6/25/24, at 9:15 a.m., [NAME] 1 washed corn in the sink labeled and used for handwashing. During an interview, on 6/26/24, at 2:22 p.m., with Registered Dietician (RD) 2, RD 2 stated food should not be rinsed in the handwashing sink because it can cause bacterial or chemical cross contamination. During an interview on 6/27/24, at 9:10 a.m., with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sample selected residents (Resident 193 and Resident 43) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene, when Resident 193 and 43's shower schedules were not followed as scheduled. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 193 and 43 not receiving showers and were unhappy about their hygiene. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). A review of Resident 193's admission Record indicated Resident 193 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including C-Diff (a bacterium that can infect the bowel and cause diarrhea) and Osteomyelitis (bone infection). A review of Resident Shower and CNA lunch schedule, dated 3/5/24, indicated Resident 193 and 43 were supposed to have showers during the P.M. shift, Resident 43 every Monday and Thursday, and Resident 193 every Tuesday and Friday. A review of Resident 193…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 70) investigated for resident assessment, the facility failed to electronically transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) Discharge assessment within the required 14 days. This failure had the potential to result in the lack of specific information for quality measure purposes. Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility for idiopathic aseptic necrosis (A condition in which there is a loss of blood flow to bone tissue, which causes the bone to die) of right femur. During a concurrent joint interview and record review on 6/26/24 at 12:15 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, MDSC stated Resident 70's discharge assessment, dated 2/6/24, was completed on 2/16/24 but was transmitted late on 6/24/24, well beyond the required 14 days after completion date. MDSC stated there was an error in their computer system where some MDS assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 35) when Resident 35's PASRR assessment did not indicate diagnoses of Schizophrenia (A mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior), and Depression (mental condition where the affected feels negative emotions more strongly than ever). This failure placed Resident 35 at risk to not receive care and services appropriate to his needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, printed on 6/25/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 had medical diagnoses of Schizophrenia and Depression. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 6/26/24, at 11:30 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 35's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening, submitted on 2/27/24 was reviewed. LVN 1 confirmed Resident 35's PASRR Question 10. Does the individual have serious diagnosed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of three (Resident 33) sampled residents investigated for limited range of motion (the extent or limit to which a part of the body can be moved around a joint or a fixed point), the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan that addressed Resident 33's limited range of motion was revised. This failure had the potential to result in the lack of coordination of care for Resident 33. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 had diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing) affecting the right dominant side, weakness, and cognitive communication deficit (person has difficulty communicating both verbal and non-verbal). During an observation on 6/24/24, at 10:36 a.m., Resident 33 was sitting at the edge of the bed, wearing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of four (Resident 33) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living care (ADL care), the facility failed to ensure Resident 33 received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health when podiatry (branch of medicine devoted to the study, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders of the foot, ankle and lower limb) services were not provided. This failure had the potential to result in foot pain and loss of toenails for Resident 33. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (long-term [chronic] disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood) and cognitive communication deficit (person has difficulty communicating both verbal and non-verbal). During an observation, on 6/24/24, at 10:36 a.m., Resident 33 had thickened, curly and yellowish gray toenails on both feet. During a review of Resident 33's Order Summary Report, dated 6/25/24, the Order Summary Report indicated a physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective storage of non-controlled medications when medications for disposal were not securely stored and rendered irretrievable. This failure had the potential for misuse of the medications. Findings: During an observation on 6/26/24, at 9:30 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 dispensed, crushed and placed four medications in separate 30 milliliters (ml) transparent plastic cup for a resident. However, LVN 2 was unable to administer and held these medications. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/26/24, at 9:40 a.m., with LVN 2, in room [ROOM NUMBER], LVN 2 discarded held medications in the trash bin attached to the right external side of the medication cart. Medication cart trash bin was left open. LVN 2 stated, non-controlled medications can be discarded in a regular trash bin or flushed in the toilet. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/26/24, at 10:45 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sample selected residents (Resident 1) stays free from accidents, when Resident 1 fell from the bed while Certified Nurse Assistance (CNA) 1 provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL, those activities needed for self-care and mobility and include activities such as bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, ambulation, toileting, eating, transferring, and communicating). This failure in practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a skin laceration and transported to the emergency department. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, undated, the Face Sheet indicated Patient 1 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with multiple diagnoses including stroke (a loss of blood flow to part of the brain, which damages brain tissue) and paralytic syndrome (a medical condition characterized by neuromuscular weakness that can progress to paralysis in severe cases) due to stroke. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident's privacy for one of three residents (Resident 1) when the privacy curtain was not fully drawn, exposing resident's body, brief (diaper), and legs during provision of care for activities of daily living (ADLs, are those needed for self-care and mobility and include activities such as bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, ambulation, toileting, eating, transferring, and communicating). This deficient practice had the potential to result in public exposure of Resident 1's body during provision of care and cause emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 3/21/24, indicated Resident 1 was totally dependent on the assistance of two staff for ADLs. During an observation on 6/6/24 at 11:15 am, Resident 1 was in an occupied 2-bed room with Resident 1's bed on the side of the room near the window. Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN) 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain bathing, personal hygiene, turning & repositioning for one of three resident samples (Resident 1), when one staff instead of two staff provided care for activities of daily living (ADLs, are those needed for self-care and mobility and include activities such as bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, ambulation, toileting, eating, transferring, and communicating) for Resident 1. This failure caused undue pain and distress for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses that included diabetes, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hypertensin, and depression. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 3/21/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was totally dependent on the assistance of two staff for ADLs, Helper does ALL the effort. Resident does none of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Representative (RR) was notified of changes in condition and treatment of one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents, when: 1. Resident 1 developed an unstageable pressure injury and the wound progressed to a Stage 4 pressure injury and received wound debridement (process of removal of dead (necrotic) or infected skin tissue to help a wound heal) multiple times as part of the treatment plan. 2. Resident 1 ' s Physician was not notified and updated on the progress of wound from skin shear to Stage IV pressure injury (a pressure injury develops when one or more layers of skin and tissue are damaged from continuous pressure to the area. The depth of skin and tissue damage determines the stage of the pressure ulcer, which is on a scale of stage I to stage IV, stage IV the deepest ulcer, including damaged skin and muscle down to the level of bone). This deficient practice prevented Resident 1 ' s RR from exercising his rights to participate in her plan of care. This failure also caused Resident 1 ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment consistent with professional standards to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when: 1. Resident 1 did not have a physician ' s order for wound treatment and no wound treatments were documented on treatment administration record from 1/25/24 to 2/22/24. 2. Resident 1 ' s weekly skin assessment was not completed and accurately documented for multiple months. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening existing pressure ulcer and slow healing of a stage IV pressure injury (a localized damage to the skin and/ or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony area, or related to a medical or other device). Findings: 1.During a record review of admission Record, printed on 4/12/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2023. The admission Record indicated that Resident 1 has medical diagnoses to include hemiplegia (loss of muscle function on one side of body) affecting left dominant side, weakness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to ensure accurate procedure for administering medications to meet the needs of each resident when non-crushable medications were crushed and administered without consultation with the prescribing physician. This failure had the potential to result in rendering the medications ineffective while increasing their side effects. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 3/27/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with essential hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and sepsis with pneumonia (life-threatening complication of an infection, pneumonia, an infection in the lung). During a review of Resident 1's Skilled Nursing Facility Orders, printed 3/1/24, the Skilled Nursing Facility Orders indicated for Resident 1 to receive pureed diet and for Pneumonia Prevention,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care for oral care was developed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with Resident 1 ' s current assessed needs. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not to meet Resident ' s current physical needs. Findings: During a review of Resident1 ' s face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted in November 2022, with diagnoses that included stroke, diabetes, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident1 ' s Medication Review Report, dated 12/1/23, the Medication Review Report indicated an order for Peridex solution (Chlorhexidine Gluconate) Apply to mouth topically every day and evening shift for Pneumonia Prevention Protocol Supervise or assist oral care twice daily with soft brush and then Peridex oral solution 15ml-Swish and spit twice per day. During a telephone interview on 1/10/24 at 4:35 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 1 would sometimes refuse oral care and would want family to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who required assistance from staff for grooming and personal hygiene, the facility failed to provide assistance with urinary and bowel incontinence to ensure good personal hygiene. This failure resulted in Resident 1's poor personal hygiene and grooming. Resident 1's bedside and bed linens reeked of strong urine-like smell. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included functional urinary incontinence, bladder cancer, and unspecified complication of genitourinary prosthetic device (device that are implanted to restore function of the genitourinary system, organs of the reproductive and urinary system), implant and graft, initial encounter. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care), dated 12/14/23, the MDS indicated a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents received a copy of requested medical records in a timely manner. This failure resulted in a delay of 29 days before release of copies of Resident 1's requested medical records. Findings: During an interview on 4/12/22 at 10:35 a.m., with Medical Records Director (MRD), MRD stated she received a request for copies of Resident 1's medical records on 2/23/22. MRD stated the request was forwarded to the corporate office for approval per facility policy. MRD stated after the corporate office approved release of requested medical records, which could take anywhere from a couple days to one week, MRD would send the requested records to the requestor. MRD stated she was the only employee able to provide copies of medical records, and she was not available from 2/25/22 until 3/4/22. MRD stated she thought she had 30 days to complete the request because the resident no longer resided in the facility. During a record review of emails dated from 2/23/22 to 3/24/22, emails indicated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for eight of 13 residents (Resident 3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 24) reviewed for resident assessments, the facility failed to assess residents using the quarterly review instrument as required. This failure had the potential to result in the delay of assessment of the residents' needs and goals of care and inability to monitor each residents' decline and progress over time. Findings: During a telephone interview and concurrent record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 2/17/22 at 1:08 p.m., MDSC stated all Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) assessments should be completed timely based on the requirement in Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a system for evaluation and documentation in long-term care) manual. MDSC stated the facility records of MDS assessments indicated the following: - Resident 3's combined quarterly and discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed 2/15/22 (53 days after the Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in sanitary conditions when several food items in the kitchen refrigerator were either unlabeled or stored beyond their use-by dates. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation and concurrent interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 2/14/22 at 10:25 a.m., the following were observed: -Refrigerator # 2's external thermometer indicated a temperature of 45 degrees Fahrenheit (deg. F). There was no internal thermometer to measure the temperature inside the refrigerator that contained multiple food items. CDM stated the internal thermometer was taken out Friday, 2/11/22 because it was broken. CDM stated he did not know how to ensure the temperature inside the refrigerator stays below 41 deg. F as required. -Inside refrigerator #1, there was a small container of applesauce with a use-by date of 2/12/22, a pitcher of unlabeled orange-colored liquid with a use-by date of 2/9/22, and a gallon container, a quarter amount full of red-colored,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection prevention and control program policies and procedures (P&P) designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the spread of disease and infections when: 1. Improper signage on two of two resident room doors (Residents 79 and 85) with confirmed COVID-19 (a mild to severe lung illness). 2. Disposal of used isolation gown outside of resident room (Resident 85) with known COVID-19. 3. No surveillance vital signs (temperature, pulse, respiratory rate and blood pressure) for multiple days for five of five sampled residents. 4. Eye drop vials used for a resident, fell on the floor and was returned in the medication cart without being disinfected. 5. Nurse had long acrylic nails. These failures had the potential to spread disease and infection among facility residents and staff, including COVID-19, resulting in mild to severe illness and potential death. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/14/22, at 11:58 a.m., of Station 1 hallway, two confirmed COVID-19 positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify one (Resident 235) sampled residents' physician and representative or family member of a significant weight loss of 20 pounds in a month. This deficient practice had the potential to deny Resident 235's necessary treatment options and his representative the right to be informed. Findings: Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care) dated 12/25/21 indicated, Resident 235 was admitted on [DATE] and required set up help with eating. Resident 235 had no weight loss in the last month. Resident 235's diagnoses included anemia (a condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells) and chronic pain. Review of the weights summary indicated on 12/22/21, Resident 235 weighed 209 pounds. On 1/23/22, Resident 235 weighed 189 pounds. This was a significant weight loss of 20 pounds in a month. Review of Resident 235's medication review report dated 12/21/21 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for two of 13 residents (Resident 2 and 10), the facility failed to conduct an annual/comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) assessment in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in the lack of assessment of residents' needs, strengths, and goals of care. Findings: During a telephone interview and concurrent record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 2/17/22 at 1:08 p.m., MDSC stated all Minimum Data Set assessments should be completed timely based on the requirement in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a system for evaluation and documentation in long-term care) manual. MDSC stated the facility records of Residents 2 and 10's MDS assessments indicated the following: - Resident 2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed 2/15/22 (63 days after the Assessment Reference Date [ARD, the last day of the observation period that the assessment covers for the resident], the ARD is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to initiate a person centered care plan and or evaluate care for three sampled residents (Residents 29, 73, 86) when, 1. The facility did not initiate a care plan when Resident 29 had repeated episodes of vaginal bleeding. 2. Resident 86 was not evaluated for pain relief after the administration of narcotic pain medication. 3. Resident 73 had a wound on the right great toe and did not identify a developing wound of the right second toe. These deficient practices resulted in the decline in physical condition and delayed treatment. Resident 86 had the inability to perform daily tasks and tolerate treatment. For Resident 73, no treatment was provided for wounds on the right toes. Findings: 1. During an interview on 2/14/22 at 10:29 a.m., Resident 29 stated she had vaginal bleeding. Review of the change in condition documents indicated on 1/27/22 Resident 29 had blood tinged urine. Further review indicated on 1/29/22 and 2/13/22, Resident 29 had blood coming out of the vagina. During an interview on 2/16/22 at 11:37 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 77) was free from unnecessary drugs. Resident 77 was administered Depakote (a mood stabilizer) medication without monitoring the target behavior and adverse medication side effects. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 77 to receive unnecessary drugs and possible adverse side effects. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Resident Assessment and Care guide tool, dated 12/20/21, indicated Resident 77 had short and long term memory problems. Resident 77 had slurred speech, and mumbled words. Resident 77 rarely makes self understood or understands others and no behavioral symptoms. The diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and psychotic disorder (a mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality). Review of Resident 77's order summary dated 12/2/21 indicated the physician prescribed Depakote 250 mg (milligram) by mouth, two time a day for unspecified psychosis (see, hear or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the policy regarding food brought to residents by family and provide a safe handling and sanitary storage, including refrigeration. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness. Findings: During a joint interview with the Treatment Nurse (TN) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 on 2/17/22 at 10:57 a.m., TN and CNA 2 each stated they did not know where to store and how to go about food brought from home. TN went to find the answer from management and returned. TN stated food brought from home by family were stored inside the refrigerator in the staff break room. TN stated there were no refrigerators to store resident's food in the station's medication room. During an interview with CNA 3 who was inside the staff break room on 2/17/22 at 11:11 a.m., CNA 3 stated there was no place designated for storing food for residents that were brought from home. CNA 3 stated, usually, when family brought food for residents, the food is already warmed up and ready to eat and were only good for one-sitting.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper garbage and refuse disposal when garbage was stored in bins without lids outside the kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in an unsanitary environment and the potential to attract pests. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 2/14/22 at 10:25 a.m., outside the kitchen, there were two blue garbage containers that did not have lids and were full of garbage. CDM stated the garbage was from resident care areas and the kitchen collected from the morning hours. CDM stated the garbage would stay in those bins until the garbage truck collects them. According to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2017, under Outside Receptacles, receptacles and waste handling units for refuse with materials containing food residue and used outside the food establishment shall be designed to have tight-fitting lids or covers.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WINDSOR — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WINDSOR HAYSAC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2010
ANTELOPE HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
WINDSOR OXFORD HOLDING COMPANY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
ROBIN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
TRESS, AVROHOMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
NEWGEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
ABUDAYEH, NABILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
PRESTON-FOO, CARMENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
SHAW, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
ANTELOPE REALTY HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$173K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 7%Other / private 19%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $173K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$428per resident / day
operating cost
$13,014per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$398per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555398. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next