Country Drive Post Acute
2500 Country Drive, Fremont, CA 94536 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 126 certified beds · (510) 792-4242 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 34.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.4% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.85 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.4%CMS range 35.2–55.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 9.7–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 6.1–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 112.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), monitoring and interventions were in place to prevent development of pressure ulcer (skin and soft tissue injuries that develop due to prolonged pressure exerted over specific areas of the body). Resident 1 developed a pressure ulcer on posterior of the right lower leg where an immobilizer (a device used to support and stabilize the leg and knee) was applied. These failures resulted in a facility acquired, unstageable pressure ulcer (pressure ulcer known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by moist dead tissue and/or crusty, dry, and dead tissue), on the right lower leg that caused pain and extended Resident 1 ' s stay at the facility. Findings: During a review of facility ' s admission Record (AR) printed on [DATE], the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Periprosthetic Fracture Around Internal Prosthetic Right Hip Joint, (A broken bone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice of rights and services prior to or upon admission for four of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4), when admission agreements were either delayed or not provided at all.This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary emotional stress, diminished autonomy in making healthcare choices and violation of resident rights.During an interview on 2/23/26 at 11:41 a.m. with Admissions Director (AD), AD stated the admission agreement is very important as it covers information about resident rights, advanced directives, facility and Ombudsman information, arbitration agreement and details on what residents should expect. AD stated the resident or the resident's decision-maker should sign the admission agreement within 72 hours of admission.1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 2/20/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The AR also indicated Resident Representative (RR) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) received advance notice of a roommate change, when Resident 6 was moved into Resident 2's room. This failure had the potential to result in avoidable psychosocial distress.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR) dated 2/23/26, the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included encounter for removal of internal fixation device (a medical procedure involving the removal of hardware, such as screws, plates, or rods, that were previously implanted to stabilize a bone or joint), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive worry, nervousness, or fear that can interfere with daily activities), and depression (a mood disorder marked by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities).During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) had their personal funds safeguarded when Resident 5's wallet containing $140, which had been entrusted to the facility's Social Services Director (SSD), was not secured in accordance with facility procedures. This failure resulted in Resident 5's $140 going missing, which had the potential for psychosocial outcomes including anxiety, distress, and reduced trust in the facility's ability to safeguard belongings.During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR) dated 2/23/26, the AR indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition characterized by high levels of sugar in the blood due to the body's inability to produce or use insulin effectively), benign prostatic hyperplasia (a non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland that can cause urinary problems in men), and chronic gout (a long-term form of arthritis caused by the buildup of uric acid crystals in the joints, leading to pain and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) received a summary of the baseline care plan, when neither Resident 3 nor Resident 3's Representative (RR 3) were provided with the required summary.This failure had the potential to place Resident 3 at risk for unmet needs, inconsistent care and adverse health outcomes.During a review of Resident 3's AR dated 2/20/26, the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fractured left pubis (a break in the left side of the pubic bone, which is part of the pelvis), sacrum (the triangular bone at the base of the spine), and upper end of left humerus (a break near the top of the left upper arm bone), dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, often involving memory loss and impaired judgment), difficulty in walking, and delirium (a sudden and severe confusion due to rapid changes in brain function, often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure consistent implementation and proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when staff members were not wearing the N95 respirator (respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles), or N95 respirator was worn improperly. Visitors were not aware of the recommendation to use face mask when visiting their family members. These failures had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents and visitors due to exposure to respiratory illness.During an observation on 08/08/25 at 2:30 p.m., in the facility's reception area, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and Housekeeper (HS) 1 were not wearing face masks. Receptionist 1 was in the reception area, and her face mask was pulled down and tucked under her chin.During an interview on 08/08/25 at 2:35 p.m., with the Administrator (ADM), ADM stated the Infection Preventionist (IP) was out on leave, and the Assistant Director of Nursing was covering. ADM stated before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a minimum of 3.5 Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - refers to the minimum number of direct care service hours a facility is required to provide to each resident per day) and a minimuim of 2.4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) DHPPD on ten weekend days. This failure had the potential to result insufficient nursing staff and inadequate nursing care for the facility residents. Findings: During an interview on 4/23/25, at 9:53 a.m., with Staff Developer Assistant (SDA), SDA stated they completed the daily staffing schedule and were required to staff for a minimum of 3.5 DHPPD and 2.4 CNA DHPPD. During an interview on 4/23/25, at 10:28 a.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated staffing effected patient care, and patient care was a top priority. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/25, at 11:11 a.m. with Payroll Coordinator (PC), the Facility's Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) reports between 5/1/24 through 6/30/24 were reviewed. PC stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that prescription medications were properly labeled and stored as evidenced by: 1. This failure was identified during the inspection of one of three medication carts and had the potential to result in medication errors, including the risk of incorrect administration, diversion, or harm to residents receiving medications from that cart when multiple medications were found without a prescription label. 2. The facility stored multiple medications in a medication refrigerator that was operating at a temperature of 14°F, significantly below the required refrigeration range of 36°F to 46°F. This deficiency created the potential for insulin degradation, rendering the medication ineffective or unsafe for resident use. The failure to maintain proper storage conditions compromised the integrity of medications administered to multiple residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/21/25, at approximately 2:00 PM, it was observed alongside Registered Nurse (RN 1). During the inspection, it was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities for one resident of 23 sampled residents (Resident 266) based on assessment and care plan, preferences, and in a manner designed to meet the resident's needs. This failure placed Resident 266 at risk for isolation and boredom and may negatively impact his psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 266's admission record indicated Resident 266 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, weakness, and difficulty in walking. During an observation on the intial tour, on 4/21/25 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 266 was lying in bed, awake, alert. Resident 266 had in his hands a plastic syringe used for his Gastrostomy tube (G Tube- A medical device inserted into the stomach to deliver food and liquids) and played with it. Resident 266 unable to talk when spoken to. No TV or music was playing in the room.When alerted, CNA 1 entered Resident 266's room and took the syringe from Resident 266 and placed it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 220), an ongoing and consistent collaboration with dialysis center for Resident 220 was established. Resident 220's dialysis communication binder did not contain the current physicians orders, no follow up for recommended medication to be discontinued, and facility staff was noting inconsistent assessment on the dialysis access site. These failures had the potential to affect Resident 220's health and safety due to lack of coordination with dialysis center. Findings: During a review of facility's admission Record indicated Resident 220 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included severe kidney disease and hypertensive emergency. Resident 220's physician orders indicated Clonidine (medication used to treat high blood pressure) transdermal patch weekly 0.3 milligram (mg)/24 hour. Apply two patches transdermally one time a day every seven days related to essential hypertension.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate medication administration for 2 of 25 medications observed during a medication pass, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%, which exceeds the acceptable federal threshold of 5%. This failure created the potential for subtherapeutic treatment, adverse side effects, and inadequate symptom control for Resident 38. Findings: On 4/2/125, at approximately 1:16 PM, the surveyor conducted a medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. During this observation, RN 1 administered Lantus Insulin, 17 units subcutaneously (SC), and Novolog Insulin, 4 units SC, to Resident 38. During the administration of Novolog Insulin, the surveyor observed that RN 1 failed to follow proper technique by not holding the insulin pen in place for the full manufacturer-recommended time following injection. The needle was held in place for approximately 2 to 3 seconds before being withdrawn. According to manufacturer package insert, insulin pens must be held in place for at least 5 to 10 seconds to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary services followed proper sanitation for food service safety when: the three compartment sink was not maintained clean. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination and an outbreak of food borne illness to 98 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, in the initial tour of the kitchen, on 5/15/23, at 10:03 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), observed the three compartment sink right counter with a green worn out sponge and a silvery mesh, a red bucket, an open box of traditional bakery cornbread mix, and surface of the counter was wet and dirty with brownish black and white food particles. The DS stated, they used the compartment sink for manual washing of dishes and pans and were currently using the dish machine. During a concurent observation and interview in a follow-up tour of the kitchen, on 5/17/23, at 10:17 a.m., there was a white residue on the side of the middle sink of the three compartment sink and vegetable food particles in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (a treatment to remove extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys cannot) communication records were completed for three residents (Resident 201, Resident 54, and Resident 56) out of 5 sampled residents. This failure has the potential to miss signs of illness such as fever or bleeding, which could lead to hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 201's admission record indicated admission date of 5/14/23 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (the last stage of long-term kidney disease where the kidneys no longer work), with a dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident 54's admission record indicated an admission date of 04/08/23 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease with a dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident 56's admission record indicated an admission date of 08/26/22 with a diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. During a record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate of less than 5% when three errors were observed in 36 medication pass opportunities which resulted in 8.33 % medication error rate. The errors as follows: Dorzolamide HCl solution 2%, (used to lower high eye pressure), Fish Oil capsule (Omega -3 Fatty acids- supplements) and Multivitamin with minerals medications were omitted for Resident 43, during medication pass observation on 5/16/23. This failure had the potential to put resident (Resident 43) at risk for harm and/or adverse consequences. Findings: During medication pass observation and concurrent interview with LVN 1 on 5/16/23, at the beginning of 8:50 AM, at the doorway of Resident 43's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was preparing Resident 43's medications with gloves on. LN 1 was observed administering the following medications via G-tube (Gastrostomy tube- a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach) to Resident 43: Amiodarone HCL (anti arrhythmic-a type of drug that is used to help…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of six residents (Resident 351) within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This failure ha the potential to not providing an effective, person-centered and quality resident care. Findings: Resident 351 is a [AGE] year old, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure), difficulty in walking and hyperlipidemia (cholesterol in the blood), Hemodialysis(treatment of filtering waste and water from your Blood). During the initial facility tour on 5/15/23 at 10:30 am, observed Resident 351 in bed with Oxygen at 2L/min, lying on a low air loss bed, turned to her left side facing the glass sliding door. A follow up visit with Resident 351, on 5/17/23, at 10:05 am, observed resident in bed turned to left side facing the glass sliding door. Resident 351 said ouch when surveyor introduced self to resident. Did not verbalize any words or response to questions asked by surveyor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise a comprehensive plan of care for one of six residents, (Resident 27), when her wounds were healed and wanted to get out of bed and do more things outside the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 27 to cause further decline of mobility and psychosocial issues. Findings: Resident 27 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted in December 2021 with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition; type 2 diabetes mellitus (blood sugar disorder) and contracture (shortening or stiffening) of muscles. The minimum data set (MDS- assessment tool), brief interview for mental status (BIMS), dated 12/14/22, score 13, indicating intact cognition. During the initial tour of the facility, on 5/15/23 at 10:38 am, observed Resident 27 lying in bed. A follow up visit with Resident 27 on 5/17/23, at 11 am, observed Resident 27 is still in bed. When asked if she had been getting up, she stated ,I do not get up at all . I had a lot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 251), had clean and groomed fingernails. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 251 pain, injury, and infection. Finding: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/23, at 10:04 a.m., Resident 251's fingernails were long, and dirty with black matter inside the nails. Resident stated,, they told staff about it and staff didn't do anything about it. Resident 251 stated it was upsetting. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/17/23, at 1:02 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 251's fingernails were observed. DON stated Resident's 251's fingernails were long and dirty. During an interview on 5/17/23, at 1:25 p.m., with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 stated Resident 251's long and dirty fingernails should have been identified on admission and were a risk for infection. During an interview on 5/18/23, at 11:01 a.m., with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated, they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen administration for one of four sampled residents (Resident 150). This failure had the potential to place Resident 150 at risk for incorrect oxygen treatments and jeopardize Resident 150's health and wellbeing. Findings: Resident 150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses that included weakness and lack of coordination. During an observation on 5/15/23, at 11 am, Resident 150 was observed sitting in a chair by her bedside, with oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula (a two-pronged plastic tubing used to deliver oxygen therapy through the nose), attached through the long tubing to the oxygen concentrator ((a medical device for oxygen therapy, it takes in air from the room and filter out nitrogen). Resident 150's O2 was observed at 2 Liters per minute (L/min). During an observation on 5/17/23, at 11:05 am, Resident 150 was observed sitting in her wheelchair. Resident was waiting for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 15), the facility failed to document an adequate indication and diagnosis for the use of Seroquel (a medication used to treat certain mental/mood condition). This failure placed Resident at unnecessary risk for adverse consequences related to the use of Seroquel. Findings: During a review of Resident's 15 face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 15 was admitted on [DATE] (originally admitted on [DATE]), with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease [a degenerative disease and is the most common cause of dementia (gradual loss of memory and decision-making capacity)]. During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to direct resident care dated 4/20/23 indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS, a brief scanner to help detect cognitive impairment) indicated score of 01 indicating Resident 15 had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of the physician order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 43) was free of significant medication errors when the Amiodarone HCL ( anti arrhythmic-a type of drug that is used to help the heart stay in a normal rhythm) and Keppra (antiepileptics- a type of drug that is used to prevent or treat seizures) medications for Resident 43 were not entirely administered via gastrostomy tube (G-tube- a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach). This failure resulted for Resident 43 not to receive an accurate dosage and full therapeutic effect of the medications which could potentially lead to more serious medical complications. Findings: A Review of Resident 43's Order Summary Report active orders as of 5/16/23, indicated an order on 2/6/23 for Amiodarone HCL 50 milligram (mg- a measure of weight) once a day for Cardiac Arrythmia (irregular heartbeat) and Keppra tablet 500 mg twice a day to be administered via G-tube for Epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes seizure). During the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 4 of 46 sampled residents (Resident 76, 82, 112, and 105), facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when: 1. Facility staff assisted Residents 76, 105 and 112 with their meals while standing. 2. Facility staff who assisted Resident 82 with meals stood up two times, interrupting the resident's meal. This failure had the potential to result in undignified treatment. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 on 3/18/19 at 8:55 a.m., LVN 7 was in Resident 105's room. LVN 7 stood by Resident 105's left side as Resident 105 was sitting up in bed and being assisted by LVN 7. LVN 7 stated she made sure to stand up while assisting Resident 105 with her meals because LVN 7 had already sat down doing paperwork. During an observation and concurrent interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/19/19 at 8:36 a.m., Residents 112 and Resident 76 were assisted by two facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for pain for one of 46 sampled residents (Resident 74), which had the potential to cause Resident 74 to have unmet pain relief needs. Findings: Review of the admission record for Resident 74 indicated that he was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including chronic pain. During an interview with Resident 74 on 3/18/19 at 10:51 a.m., he stated he was in a lot of pain most of the time. He stated he can get pain medication every six hours, but it was not enough. He stated he could also have Tylenol as needed, but that did not help. During an interview and concurrent record review with Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/21/19 at 10:05 a.m. of Resident 74's care plan, she stated there was no care plan for pain. She stated Resident 74 should have a care plan for pain since he was on pain medications and was assessed for pain. The facility policy and procedure titled,Care Plan, Baseline and Comprehensive, revised 11/2017, indicated, A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for two of two (Residents 37 and 76) sampled residents who were dependent on dialysis (a treatment where a machine cleans and filters the blood of toxins when the kidneys are not healthy enough to do it adequately, will be used interchangeably with hemodialysis), the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional practice and comprehensive person-centered plan of care when phosphate binders (medications that binds with dietary phosphorus in the gastrointestinal tract) were not administered as ordered by the physician. This failure had resulted in increased phosphorus level in Resident 37 and had potential to result in increased phosphorus level for Resident 76. Findings: 1. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (abnormal levels of blood sugar) and end stage kidney failure and required hemodialysis. The Order Summary Report as of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff to aid 11 of 11 sampled residents who needed feeding assistance during lunch time. This deficient practice does not promote residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation on 3/18/19 at 12:10 p.m. in the dining room, eleven of eleven dependent dining residents had their meals placed in front of them and were waiting to be assisted by staff. There were two licensed vocational nurses (LVN 7 and 8) in the dining room assisting dependent residents with eating. During an observation on 3/18/19 at 12:32 p.m. in the dining room, six of eleven dependent dining residents (Residents 13, 22, 48, 105, 112, and 117) were still waiting for assistance with eating their lunch. Resident 22 attempted to drink his chocolate milk without assistance and started choking. He continued to cough for approximately three minutes. During an interview with LVN 7 on 3/18/19 at 12:39 p.m. in the dining room, she stated residents should not be waiting for assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional principles when: 1. multiple medications were expired and were not labeled; 2. controlled substance drugs were not accounted; 3. a medication cart was left unsecured and unattended. These failures had the potential to result in decreased medication efficacy, risk of unauthorized access, use and abuse of controlled substances. Findings: 1. During a medication room inspection on [DATE] at 10:21 a.m., the following medications and biologicals were observed: a. a bottle of Ativan (also know as Lorazepam, a sedative controlled substance used to treat seizure disorders, epilepsy and to relieve anxiety) with an expiration date of [DATE] was stored with the currently used medications in the medication refrigerator; b. a bottle of Ativan with unreadable expiration date was stored with the currently used medications in the refrigerator; c. a bottle containing 100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for two of two (Residents 37 and 76) sampled residents who were dependent on dialysis, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist identified and reported irregularities in medication regimen when missed doses of phosphate binders (medications that binds with dietary phosphorus in the gastrointestinal tract) were not identified and evaluated. This failure had resulted in multiple missed doses of phosphate binders that were not addressed in a timely manner. Findings: 1. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (abnormal levels of blood sugar) and end stage kidney failure and required hemodialysis. The Order Summary Report as of 3/1/19 indicated an order dated 12/23/18 for Resident 37 to receive sevelamer carbonate 800 mg (a phosphate binder) one tablet by mouth with meals three times daily. During an interview and concurrent review of Resident 37's Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility's medication pass observation on 3/18/19 resulted in three errors out of 27 opportunities indicating a medication error rate of 11.11%. These failures placed both Resident 36 and 83 at risk for not getting the full therapeutic effect of their prescribed medications and could result in undesired health care outcomes. Findings: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident 35 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnosis which included diabetes (high blood sugar). During a med pass observation on 3/18/19 at 12:30 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN2) drew up 10 milliliters (ml) of 100 unit/ml Admelog solution (a short-acting insulin indicated to improve control in blood sugar levels) that had an opened date of 2/9/19. RN2 entered Resident 36's room and was about to give the medication. In an interview on 3/18/19 at 12:35 p.m, RN2 stated that she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven (Resident 115, 83, 44, 104, 73, 64, 56) out of 113 residents received food that was at an appetizing temperature. This failure had the potential to affect all the residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: In an interview on 3/18/19 at 9:20 a.m., Resident 115 stated, Food is cold and I do not like that. During resident council meeting on 3/19/19 at 10:56 a.m., Resident 83, 44, 104, 73, 64 and 56 stated food was served cold at the facility. During observation and concurrent interview on 3/19/19 at 12:58 p.m., a Test Tray was prepared for Regular and Puree consistency meal. While accompanied by facility's Dietary Supervisor (DM), the following observations were made: a. A Regular tray contained Chicken, Red Pinto Beans, [NAME] Beans and Orange Juice. Chicken- lukewarm, at 138 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) Red Pinto Beans- lukewarm, at 131 °F Green Beans- cold, at 116 °F Orange Juice- at 50 °F b. A Puree tray contained Chicken, Red Pinto Beans, and Spinach. Chicken- lukewarm, at 132 °F…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer therapeutic bedtime snacks to six (Residents 44, 56, 64, 73, 83 and 104) of 46 sampled residents. This failure had resulted in Residents 44, 56, 64, 73, 83 and 104 feeling very hungry due to long periods of time in between an early dinner and having late breakfast the following day. Additionally, for Resident 44 and 83, who had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, this failure placed them at risk for Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar level which could result in a potentially dangerous health outcome up to and including death). Findings: In a resident group interview on 3/19/19 at 10:00 a.m., Residents 44, 56, 64, 73, 83 and 104 stated they were not offered snacks at night. Residents 44, 56, 64, 73, 83 and 104 added that dinner was served daily around 5:00 p.m. and breakfast was served past 7:30 a.m. the following day. Resident 73 and 104 stated that sometimes breakfast was served late and they felt very hungry not having had anything since 5:00 p.m. the previous evening. Residents 44, 56, 64, 73, 83 and 104…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. A bag of frozen diced egg in walk in refrigerator was open, not dated and not labeled. 2. Six out of Six chopping boards were worn out with deep cuts and brown colored stains. 3. Employees personal belongings were stored in emergency food storage area inside the Kitchen. 4. Three compartment sink did not have an air gap. 5. Dietary Aide (DA 1) did not cover beard in the food service area. 6. Nursing Station 2 Refrigerator (Ref 1) had residents' food that was open, but not dated and not labeled. discharged residents' food was kept in Ref 1. 7. Nursing Station 1 Refrigerator (Ref 2)'s thermometer was broken, frozen food was not frozen solid. discharged residents' food was kept in Ref 2. This failure placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During an initial tour of the Kitchen accompanied by Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of admission Record dated 3/20/19 showed Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Diabetic foot ulcer and Acquired absence of Right toe(s). Review of Resident 14's Physician Order Summary Report dated 3/20/19 showed an order stating Right 3rd toe amputation site wound: Clean with normal saline, pat dry, Apply Santyl to wound bed, pack with hydrogel impregnated 1/4 packing strip every day shift. During an observation on 3/19/19 at 9:24 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) was observed during wound treatment for Resident 14's Right 3rd toe amputation site wound. LVN 2 prepared the wound treatment supplies at Resident 14's bedside. While wearing Right hand glove, one glove fell on the floor at Resident 14's bedside. LVN 2 put on another glove on right hand and picked up the glove from the floor. LVN 2 removed the right hand glove and without washing her hand she put on another glove. LVN 2 then pulled the privacy curtain and without washing hands and without changing gloves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of two dryers were in safe operating condition when the lint screens were observed full of lint. This deficient practice has the potential to cause overheating of the dryer and fire related consequences. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/20/19 at 8:30 a.m. in the laundry room, the lint screens on both dryers were observed full of lint with excess lint in the bottom compartments of the dryers. The housekeeping supervisor (HS) stated the lint screens should be cleaned every two hours and documented on the lint clean out log. The housekeeping aide (HA) stated she did not clean the lint screens on her shift and did not document on the lint clean out log. Review of the Dryer Lint Clean Out Schedule, revised 10/7/16, indicated no initials for cleaning lint screens on 3/20/19 at 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. The facility policy and procedure titled, Description of Steps in the Laundry Process dated 10/7/16, indicated, These lint screens must be brushed and cleaned after every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for three of three residents (Residents 36, 98 and 172) who received Medicare benefits, the facility failed to inform residents of charges for services that would not be covered under Medicare or the facility's per diem rates should residents opted to stay in the facility after Medicare services were discontinued when: 1. For Resident 36, Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) Form issued was not completely filled out. 2. For Resident 98, SNFABN form did not have the resident or resident representative's signature. 3. For Resident 172, SNFABN form was not completely filled out and did not have resident's or resident representative's signature. This failure had the potential to result in uninformed healthcare decisions. Findings: 1. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (abnormal levels of blood sugar) and left leg amputation. The Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Range Of Motion (ROM) exercises to three (Resident 69, 75 and 13) of 33 sampled residents for limited ROM in extremities. This failure had the potential for Resident 69, 75 and 13 to suffer from worsening of limitation in ROM in extremities. Findings: 1. Review of admission Record dated 3/21/19 showed Resident 69 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an observation on 3/19/19 at 7:51 a.m., Resident 69 was lying in bed with left arm and left leg covered under the bed sheet. When asked if she was able to move left arm and left leg, Resident 69 nodded her head as no. Review of Initial History and Physical dated 1/22/19 showed Resident 69 had an active diagnosis of left hemiplegia (paralysis of left side). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/21/19 at 9:29 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN 2) confirmed Resident 69 did not receive ROM exercises for left side weakness. During a concurrent interview and record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to manage pain for two (Resident 120 and 26) of 46 sampled residents, when: 1. Resident 120 did not receive pain medication as desired prior to therapy session. 2. Resident 26 did not receive scheduled pain medication in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for Resident 120 and 26 to suffer from complications of pain such as limited mobility, and decreased participation in therapy. Findings: 1. Review of admission Record showed Resident 120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnosis of fracture of neck of Right femur (hip bone) and fracture of left acetabulum (socket of hip bone). Review of Resident 120's Physicians Order Summary Report dated 3/18/19 showed Resident 120 to receive: Morphine Sulphate Solution 20 mg/ml Give 10 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain. During an observation and interview with Resident 120 on 3/18/19 at 9:20 a.m., Resident 120 was lying in bed. Resident 120 stated severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services as determined by the acuity and diagnoses of resident population in accordance with the facility assessment when three of three licensed staff did not have skills competency skills check. This failure had the potential to result in poorly trained and incompetent staff providing substandard care to residents. Findings: During an interview and concurrent review of the employee files with Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 3/21/19 at 11:55 a.m., DSD stated RN 2 did not have skills check for infection control, RN 6 (hired in 2017) and LVN 4 (hired in 2016) both did not have any skills performance checklist. All three licensed staff did not have annual performance evaluations done. Review of the Facility Assessment provided by the facility at time of survey indicated facility admits and provide care that may present common diseases that included renal failure, end stage kidney disease, and infectious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WINDSOR — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANTELOPE HOLDINGS I, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/30/2023 |
| ANTELOPE REALTY HOLDINGS I, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/08/2024 |
| WINDSOR NORCAL 13 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2007 |
| ROBIN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 06/30/2023 |
| TRESS, AVROHOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 06/30/2023 |
| COUTO, DOROTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2024 |
| SHAW, PAMELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2023 |
| WIN, HTAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| NEWGEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $247K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055885. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.